RBIND/R/2017/51418

Online RTI Application 24 April 2017

Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services, New Delhi.

Re:- Seeking information under the RTI act

1. Information of the time limit within which a bank/financial

institution (e.g. insurance company that sanctions housing loan to
its employees)is expected to return the original property
documents of borrower once the instalment of the loan are
stopped by the lender bank/financial institutions.
2. Information of the rules/regulations in terms of which a
borrowers legal rights,who has paid all the remaining loan
amount or whose outstanding amount is recovered, yet whose
property documents are occupied by the bank/financial
institutions, are protected.
3. Information of the authority expected to take action in the event
of impunity in the bank/financial institutions that do not return
the property documents to borrower.

(applicant), ShriGopal Soni,

C231, Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004 https://twitter.com/revribhav
revribhav@gmail.com 91-9414982395 Enclosed: annexure**
 2

Please note the RTI fee is paid online .

Annexure:- applicant himself is victim in the matter as his
original property documents are kept by the following:-
Name of the involved Institutions:- The New India Assurance Co.
Ltd, registered office, 87,M. G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001.
Decision of the above instiutions:- On March 8,2010 a letter
CORP. HRM\CL. III & IV CELL\RG\2010 was issued by a Chief
Manager,namely Atul Sahai to their Regional Office Jaipur advising
total recovery of Rs. 346,057 including housing loan recovery from
Provident Fund of the applicant.

.
A culture of impunity is created when people in power break the law, escape
social or legal punishment, and then continue breaking the law. Impunity allows
the powerful to get away with it to break existing laws but also to exploit legal
loopholes... During 2010-2013 the Rich and Powerful in the Public Sector
Undertaking (PSU) New india Assurance company head office mumbai
deliberately misread the notice(s) of the Central Information Commission (with
copy to appellants ,e.g. the complainant) to attend video conference. The
complainant witnessed systematic loss of public money of approx. Rs. 10000/- to
25000/- per person to claim habitual ,uncalled for Delhi tour to embezzle public
money ..e.g. Delhi Tour on 20.05.2013 of a Dy GM consist of Flight expenses of
Rs. 20929/- Halting Ts. 1200/-Conveyance Rs.581/-

Ironical is that he was called upon by CIC (Central Information Commission) to

attend Video conference from Mumbai as First appellate authority of NIACL.