Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
MANILA

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for Department Heads

Major Wt Rating Scale

Key Result Performance
Final Objectives per
Area (KRA) Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
Outcomes KRA
1. Ensured 100% of
supervision of teachers
Basic Monitoring and instruction and 25% 100% of teachers were
90 99% of 80 89% of 70 79% of 69% and
Education Evaluation of provided technical were supervised E supervised
teachers teachers teachers below
Services School assistance to and provided and provided
Curriculum and teachers as technical technical
Instruction evidenced by: assistance with assistance
(40%) a. Supervisory excellent Q Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Plan performance
b. Form 178 / within the rating
STAR period
Observation
Tool
c. Pre and/or Post
June to June to June to June to
Conference T June to March
August October December January
d. Anecdotal
Report
e. Scheduled
intra-visitation
within the rating
period.
2. Ensured the 100% of teachers 100% of 69% and
E 90 99% 80 89% 70 79%
monitoring of were monitoring teachers below
learners 10% the learners Five Four Three
Two indicators One indicator
performance performance Q indicators indicators indicators
satisfied satisfied
through the satisfying the satisfied satisfied satisfied
following: following T At the end of 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks More than 3
a. Quarterly indicators: every quarter delayed delayed delayed weeks
Exams results a. Accuracy delayed
b. Performance b. Updated
 Tasks results c. Orderliness
c. Written Work d. Completeness
results e. Compliant to
at the end of every DepEd Order
quarter. No. 8 s. 2015
at the end of every
quarter.
3. Ensured on time 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators 1 indicator
E
checking and were checked were checked were checked were checked was checked
submission of the 5% 100% of the With no With 1-2 With 3-4 With 5-6 With 7 or
following: indicators were Q errors / errors / errors / errors / more errors /
a. Lesson Plan checked with no revisions revisions revisions revisions revisions
b. Teachers errors / revisions
attendance and submitted on
(Form 48) time
c. Assessment More than
Submitted on One day Two days Three days
Tools T four days
time delayed delayed delayed
d. School Forms delayed
e. Intervention
Scheme

1. Intensified support E 100% of the

80 99% 60 79% 40 59% Below 40%
and technical 15% 100% of the teachers
Human assistance to teachers teachers were Q All indicators 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
Resource through: provided with the were satisfied were satisfied were satisfied were satisfied
Development a. LAC sessions following: T Always Oftentimes Sometimes Seldom Never
(20%) b. Training / a. LAC (100% of the (80 99%) (60 79%) (40 59%) (Below 40%)
seminars in sessions time)
different levels b. Training /
c. SBIM / Monthly seminars in
Professional different
Meeting levels
d. Promotion c. SBIM /
e. Continuing Monthly
education Professional
(Graduate Meeting
Program and d. Promotion
short-term e. Continuing
courses) education
f. Scholarship (Graduate
programs Program)
g. Coaching and f. Scholarship
 Mentoring programs
program g. Coaching
within the rating and
period. Mentoring
program
within the rating
period.
Prepared but
2. Established 5% Prepared and Prepared and not
Almost On-going conceptualize
development plan for submitted one E submitted to submitted
completed preparation d
teachers. comprehensive school head yet to school
development plan head
for teachers to the With more
With no With 1-2 With 3-4 With 5-6
school head before than 7
Q errors / errors / errors / errors /
the start of the errors /
revisions revisions revisions revisions
school year. revisions
More than
Submitted on One week Two weeks Three weeks
T one month
time delayed delayed delayed
delayed
1.Ensured utilization 100% of the
School of learning materials 100% of the E learners and 80 99% 60 79% 40 59% Below 40%
Resource such as: 8% learning materials teachers
Management Students Learning were utilized such With 5 With 4 With 3 With 2 With 1
(15%) Materials as: Q indicators indicators indicators indicators indicator
Teachers Guide Students satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied
Reference Learning T Always Oftentimes Sometimes Seldom Never
Materials Materials (100% of the (80 99%) (60 79%) (40 59%) (Below 40%)
Instructional Teachers Guide time)
Materials Reference
within the rating Materials
period. Instructional
Materials
satisfying the
following
indicators:
a. Adequate
b. Availability
c. Beneficial
d. Relevance
e. Updated
within the rating
 period.
2. Ensured the 100% of the 100% of the
utilization of the 7% learners and E learners and 80 99% 60 79% 40 59% Below 40%
department facilities teachers utilized teachers
and supply materials the department Five Four Three Two indicators One indicator
within the rating facilities and Q indicators indicators indicators were satisfied was satisfied
period. supply materials were satisfied were satisfied were satisfied
satisfying the
following
indicators:
a. Functional
b. Sufficiency Always
Oftentimes Sometimes Seldom Never
c. Availability T (100% of the
(80 99%) (60 79%) (40 59%) (Below 40%)
d. Well- time)
maintained
e. Updated
within the rating
period.
1. Strengthened 5 evidences 4 evidences 3 evidences 2 evidences 1 evidence
E
Professional participation in 5% 5 evidences were were satisfied were satisfied were satisfied were satisfied was satisfied
Growth and seminars, satisfied with Very Needs
Q Outstanding Satisfactory Fair
Development workshops, outstanding rating Satisfactory Improvement
(15%) conferences and/or within the school
trainings within year.
the school year
(school, district,
division, regional,
national and/or
international) as
evidenced by:
a. Resource T Always Oftentimes Sometimes Seldom Never
speakership /
Paper
Presentation
b. Committee
chairmanship
c. Facilitation
d. TWG
membership
e. Being a Trainer
2. Upgraded E Completed Completed Completed 21 units MA 18 units MA
 Professional 5% Completed the academic
Education through Graduate Program the program requirement academic
the Graduate with superior MA / EdD / with requirement and / or above
Program General Weighted PhD comprehensi MA
Average. ve exam MA
Superior Above Poor
Average Below Average
(GWA) Average 2.01 below
Q 1.51 1.75 1.76 2.00
1.0 1.25 1.26 1.50 80 below
86 90 81 85
96 100 91 95
3. Enhanced Completed at Completed at
With 1 on- Discontinued
Professional 5% Completed at least E least 2 least 1 Not at all
going program program
Education through 2 programs within programs program
any of the the rating period.
following:
a. Short-term
courses / tech-
voc
b. Special 4 school
Within the 1 school year 2 school years 3 school years
trainings T years after
rating period after after after
c. Seminars (at and above
least 10 days)
d. TESDA courses
related to the
field of
specialization
1.Ensured Prepared SIP /
School-Based participation in the 5% Submitted SIP / AIP Submitted AIP but not Almost On-going conceptualize
E
Management development of SIP / with no errors / SIP / AIP submitted completed preparation d
Plan AIP within the given revision within the yet
(5%) time. given time. With more
With 1-2 With 3-4 With 5-6
No errors / than 7
Q errors / errors / errors /
revision errors /
revisions revisions revisions
revisions
Within the 1-2 days 3-4 days 5-6 days 7 days or
T
given time delayed delayed delayed more delayed
1. Developed two of E Two tasks One task One task Two tasks One task was
Special Tasks the following: 5% 100% completion were completed completed were developed
and Other a. action plan and completed and and developed but but not
Assignments b. action research implementation of and implemented implemented not implemented
c. training matrix
(5%) two of the implemented and one on- implemented
d. Assessment
following: going
 tool a. action plan
e. Programs / b. action research
activities c. training matrix
aligned to d. Assessment
SBM / SIP / AIP tool
f. Other tasks in e. Programs /
exigency of activities
service aligned to
SBM / SIP / AIP Very Needs
within the rating Q Outstanding Satisfactory Fair
action plan Satisfactory Improvement
period.
f. Other tasks in
exigency of
service
were attained with
an outstanding
evaluation within
the rating period.

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

Name of Principal Name of Head Teacher Name of ASDS In-Charge

Asst. Schools Division
Principal Head Teacher III/VI Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority