0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
27 Ansichten6 Seiten
1. The document discusses three constructs of trust in society: trust as an important factor in complex transactions due to risk, the relationship between ethical climates and trust with character as an important element, and trust as a multifaceted concept involving cognition, affection and behavior.
2. It presents two research questions about consumer trust in direct selling and how trust affects consumer-salesperson relationships.
3. Tables are included measuring the constructs of ability, benevolence, integrity and trust using a five point Likert scale in the context of an internet service provider.
1. The document discusses three constructs of trust in society: trust as an important factor in complex transactions due to risk, the relationship between ethical climates and trust with character as an important element, and trust as a multifaceted concept involving cognition, affection and behavior.
2. It presents two research questions about consumer trust in direct selling and how trust affects consumer-salesperson relationships.
3. Tables are included measuring the constructs of ability, benevolence, integrity and trust using a five point Likert scale in the context of an internet service provider.
1. The document discusses three constructs of trust in society: trust as an important factor in complex transactions due to risk, the relationship between ethical climates and trust with character as an important element, and trust as a multifaceted concept involving cognition, affection and behavior.
2. It presents two research questions about consumer trust in direct selling and how trust affects consumer-salesperson relationships.
3. Tables are included measuring the constructs of ability, benevolence, integrity and trust using a five point Likert scale in the context of an internet service provider.
1. Trust in Society 1. Andaleeb and Anwar (1996) propose that trust is important because the the study investigates consumers attitude transaction toward direct selling and the extent to which trust in Xprocess is complex as it the salesperson exists, and in involves substantial doing so addresses two research questions: information exchange and a. RQ1. What is the consumers trust in the bargaining. salesperson in a direct selling context as Consumers are likely to measured by different measures of trust? perceive a higher degree of b. RQ2. How does trust affect the consumer- risk in the direct selling salesperson relationship in a direct selling purchasing situation as it relates to intention to repurchase? process (Peterson et al., 1989; Yeung et al., 1993). 2. DeConinck (2011) and Mulki et al. (2006) assert that ethical climates are very much related to trust. One rationale behind both those studies assertion was that Choose one of two choices related by trust: 1. a. Egoistic-local climates are negatively related to character is an important and essential trust in supervisor. b. Egoistic-local climates are negatively related to element to form trust. And, trust in organization. ethical climates provide a 2. a. Benevolent-local climates are positively related to good trust in supervisor. guide and tool for b. Benevolent-local climates are positively related sensemaking, in terms of to trust in organizations. what the character of ones 3. a. Principled-local climates are positively related to supervisor trust in supervisor. and organization is. This is b. Principled-local climates are positively related to especially true because trust in organization. ethical climates play a very instrumental role in organizational members ethical decision making (Schwepker, 2001 3. Trust is a multifaceted and five point Likert-scale multidisciplinary issue that (1=strongly disagree; has been widely studied 2=disagree; 3=neither agree nor disagree; (Popola, 4=agree; 5=strongly 2013; Blanchard et al., agree) 2011; Cho et al., 2007 and ability Thaw et al., 2009). It 1. My Internet Service Provider is very capable of involves several performing its function. theoretical approaches, 2. My Internet Service Provider appears to be definitions, factors and successful at the services they offer. models (Rousseau et al., 3. I feel very comfortable about my Internet Service 1998). In the Providers skills. field of psychology, trust is benevolence examined in terms of 1. My Internet Service Provider is concerned about my cognition, affection and welfare. behavior. A 2. My needs and desires are very important to my willingness to be vulnerable Internet Service Provider. is still emphasized as the 3. My Internet Service Provider really looks out for key element what is important to me. integrity 1. My Internet Service Provider has a strong sense of justice. 2. I will never have to wonder whether my Internet Service Provider will stick to his/her word in terms of service delivery and my security. 3. My Internet Service Providers actions and behaviors are not very consistent. trust 1. If I had my way, I wouldnt let my Internet Service Provider have anyinfluence over issues that are important to me. 2. In dealing with my Internet Service Provider, I am cautious until they have provided proof that they are trustworthy. 3. I am cautious about my Internet Service Provider or else they could takeadvantage of me. Trust in Society Choose one of two choices related by trust: 1. a. Egoistic-local climates are negatively related to trust in supervisor. b. Egoistic-local climates are negatively related to trust in organization. 2. a. Benevolent-local climates are positively related to trust in supervisor. b. Benevolent-local climates are positively related to trust in organizations. 3. a. Principled-local climates are positively related to trust in supervisor. b. Principled-local climates are positively related to trust in organization.
five point Likert-scale
(1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=neither agree nor disagree; 4=agree; 5=strongly agree) ability 1. My Internet Service Provider is very capable of performing its function. 2. My Internet Service Provider appears to be successful at the services they offer. 3. I feel very comfortable about my Internet Service Providers skills. benevolence 1. My Internet Service Provider is concerned about my welfare. 2. My needs and desires are very important to my Internet Service Provider. 3. My Internet Service Provider really looks out for what is important to me. integrity 1. My Internet Service Provider has a strong sense of justice. 2. I will never have to wonder whether my Internet Service Provider will stick to his/her word in terms of service delivery and my security. 3. My Internet Service Providers actions and behaviors are not very consistent. trust 1. If I had my way, I wouldnt let my Internet Service Provider have anyinfluence over issues that are important to me. 2. In dealing with my Internet Service Provider, I am cautious until they have provided proof that they are trustworthy. 3. I am cautious about my Internet Service Provider or else they could takeadvantage of me. 2. Individuals Various questions are posed including: Responsibilities . What are the monitory consequences of the breakdown 1. In essence, a maintenance for production (not concept can be defined as a including the cost of repair)? set of various maintenance . What are the consequences of the breakdown for health interventions and the and safety? general structure in which . What are the consequences of the breakdown in terms of these interventions are monetary value, both foreseen man hours and materials costs (not including loss to (Waeyenbergh and Pintelon, production)? 2002, 2004). To develop a . What are the serial consequences for other processes? maintenance concept, the . How complex is the system and how difficult is the company must first review system to repair? its operation (Marquez and . What are the effects of the breakdown for the surrounding Gupta, 2006) environment? . What are the consequences of a breakdown in terms of shareholder confidence? 2. Many European Pick one of seven levels of education based on your countries have come to education: recognize non-formal _ ISCED level 0: pre-primary education defined as the learning as a tool to be used initial stage of organized instruction; it in the context is school- or centre-based and is designed for children aged of lifelong learning in order at least three years; to respond to the flexibility _ ISCED level 1: primary education begins between five requirements of the labor and seven years of age, is market; hence it is viewed compulsory in all countries and generally lasts from four to as being consistent with the six years; logic of individualization _ ISCED level 2: lower secondary education continues (Mehaut and Lecourt, the basic programs of the primary 2009). In reality, lifelong level, although teaching is typically more subject-focussed; usually, the end of this level coincides with the end of compulsory education; _ ISCED level 3: upper secondary education generally begins at the end of compulsory education; the entrance age is typically 15 or 16 years and entrance qualifications and other minimum entry requirements are usually needed; learning is the outcome of instruction is often more subject oriented and social and typical duration varies from two to five years; educational public policies _ISCED level 4: post-secondary non-tertiary education that intend not only to straddles the boundary between relieve some of the distress upper secondary and tertiary education; typical examples provoked are programs designed to prepare by flexible labor market pupils for studies at level 5 or programs designed to conditions, but also to prepare pupils for direct labor market entry; provide people with more _ ISCED level 5: tertiary education (first stage) entry options as normally requires the successful regards personal completion of level 3 or 4; includes tertiary programs with development (OECD, 2005) academic orientation which are largely theoretically based and occupation orientation which are typically shorter and geared for entry into the labor market; _ ISCED level 6: tertiary education (second stage) leads to an advanced research qualification (PhD or doctorate).
3. While the link between five point Likert-scale
corporate social (1=strongly disagree; responsibility (CSR) and 2=disagree; 3=neither agree nor disagree; financial performance has 4=agree; 5=strongly been extensively agree) investigated[1], the 1. CSR is associated with lower risk. association between CSR 2. CSR is associated with higher risk. and firm risk remains much 3. The relation between CSR and risk differs with the less understood. Orlitzky individual dimension of social performance being and Benjamin (2001) considered. review the empirical 4. CSR concerns impact risk more than CSR strengths. evidence and underline the differences in methodologies and inconsistencies across studies. Nonetheless, a weak negative relationship seems to exist between CSR and risk, which supports the idea that CSR activities can help firms to mitigate the fallout from negative events. For instance, CSR may reduce the likelihood of lawsuits due to accidental pollution and may generate goodwill that insulates firms against a public backlash. Individuals Responsibilities . What are the monitory consequences of the breakdown for production (not including the cost of repair)? . What are the consequences of the breakdown for health and safety? . What are the consequences of the breakdown in terms of monetary value, both man hours and materials costs (not including loss to production)? . What are the serial consequences for other processes? . How complex is the system and how difficult is the system to repair? . What are the effects of the breakdown for the surrounding environment? . What are the consequences of a breakdown in terms of shareholder confidence? Pick one of seven levels of education based on your education: _ ISCED level 0: pre-primary education defined as the initial stage of organized instruction; it is school- or centre-based and is designed for children aged at least three years; _ ISCED level 1: primary education begins between five and seven years of age, is compulsory in all countries and generally lasts from four to six years; _ ISCED level 2: lower secondary education continues the basic programs of the primary level, although teaching is typically more subject- focussed; usually, the end of this level coincides with the end of compulsory education; _ ISCED level 3: upper secondary education generally begins at the end of compulsory education; the entrance age is typically 15 or 16 years and entrance qualifications and other minimum entry requirements are usually needed; instruction is often more subject oriented and typical duration varies from two to five years; _ISCED level 4: post-secondary non-tertiary education straddles the boundary between upper secondary and tertiary education; typical examples are programs designed to prepare pupils for studies at level 5 or programs designed to prepare pupils for direct labor market entry; _ ISCED level 5: tertiary education (first stage) entry normally requires the successful completion of level 3 or 4; includes tertiary programs with academic orientation which are largely theoretically based and occupation orientation which are typically shorter and geared for entry into the labor market; _ ISCED level 6: tertiary education (second stage) leads to an advanced research qualification (PhD or doctorate).