Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Cory Kim
Dr. Worth
AP Literature
24 April 2017
In Franz Kafkas novella The Metamorphosis the protagonist, Gregor, has transformed
into a giant cockroach. Later in the novella, there is a scene where his father throws small red
apples to the point where one is [driven] into Gregors back really hard (Kafka, 52). While
this scene is comical in context, it is far more interesting in the realm of physics and
mathematics. How fast did Gregors father need to throw that apple to have it embedded into a
This whole scenario is unconventional in many ways and has several variables that need
to be assumed if we want to start making calculations. The first assumption is that we will need
to assume that the special apple thrown is indestructible. If the apple had exploded instead, the
scene would have been far more boring. The second assumption that is necessary is that there is
no acceleration along the x-axis (). If there were acceleration on the x-axis, many more variables
would need accounting for, such as air-resistance, launch angle, etc. The third assumption is that
this apple is average and nearly spherical. It is assumed to be average so that a value for mass
can be easily obtained; the average apple weighs nearly 1 N, or 0.100 kg (Zitzewitz, Neff, 94).
The near-spherical assumption will become much more understood later in the paper. While
there will be many smaller assumptions made in the calculations to come, it is important to note
Kim 2
that without such assumptions, finding the exact velocity of the apple would be impossible (for
With our assumptions made, the next step is to figure out in what way(s) can we
approach this problem. So far all we have is the mass of the apple, ma; we are trying to find va,
the velocity of the apple. So far it doesnt look too good, but we can at least develop strategies
by understanding the scenario from a physics standpoint. Gregors father throws an apple at
Gregor, which is launched with a velocity of va. With our second assumption made earlier, we
know that since there is no acceleration, the velocity will be the same the instance before impact.
The next instance later, the apple is embedded a distance s into the giant cockroachs back over a
time interval t. Having introduced these two variables instantly opens up the ability to use two
Since we know the mass of the apple, and we are looking for the velocity at which it was
p = ma v a
Momentum is defined as the product of a projectiles mass an acceleration. The SI unit for
momentum is kg (m/s). Knowing that the apples final momentum is zero, since its final velocity
is zero (apple is stopped completely when embedded), we can use the Impulse-Momentum
Theorem, which relates the change in momentum with an objects impulse. To relate impulse
with change in momentum, we need to start with Newtons Second Law (Newton, Book 3):
F = ma
Kim 3
While we did assume acceleration would be zero earlier, we are able to leave it alone as we have
not yet applied this expression to the scenario. Since we want to relate change in velocity to this
a = dv/dt F = m(dv/dt)
Acceleration is defined as the change in velocity over time. Knowing this we can change the
expression for acceleration in terms of velocity and time, and replace it in our original expression
for force. To get closer to having it in terms of velocity, we will need to separate our variables
F dt = mdv
We want this to be a definite integral so no constants will need to be solved for. Note that force
F is the force, in Newtons, the apple needs to overcome to penetrate the cockroachs outer shell.
Since the penetrative force and the apples dont change, we can pull both out of our integrand:
t 0
F p dt = ma dv
0 va
The upper bound of the integral in terms of time is just t, since the initial time will just be zero,
which goes in the lower bound. The upper bound of the integral in terms of velocity is zero,
since the final velocity of the apple is zero. The lower bound of this integral is va, the velocity of
the apple, since this is the initial velocity. After evaluating the integral, we get (Newton, Book
3):
F p (t 0) = ma (0 v a ) F p t = ma v a
Note that the expression on the right lacks a negative symbol. The negative symbol may be
ignored in this case, as it is only meant to denote direction. We are just looking for magnitudes.
Kim 4
Now that we have utilized the Impulse-Momentum Theorem, we are given an expression in
terms of Fp, t, ma, and va. Using some algebra we can just rearrange the expression to get a
v a (t) = (F p t) / ma
With this function, an input value for the time-of-impact will produce the velocity required to
Another way to approach this problem is recognizing the fact that a certain amount of
work is needed for the apple to travel distance s into Gregors back. We know that the general
expression for work is the cross product of a constant force and the distance it is applied over.
However, since we are working along a single axis, it is just the product of force and distance:
W = Fs
Using reason, we can conclude that a projectiles change in kinetic energy will be equal to the
work needed for the apple to penetrate into the cockroachs back. There is a mathematical proof,
but it would be redundant as it simply verifies the energy transfer between a moving object and
the work required to stop it. This is called the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem (Kobes):
W = K = (1/2)m(v f2 v2i )
With this relationship, we can set the kinetic energy expression equal to the original expression
for work. The initial velocity in this case is still va, and the final velocity is still zero.
Rearranging and simplifying the expression yields a function for velocity va in terms of how deep
(1/2)ma (0 v 2a ) = F p s
v a (s) = (2F p s) / ma
Kim 5
Now that we have two functions for velocity in terms of time and distance, one major
problem area remains. In both functions, mass is a value we already have (assumed to be 0.100
kg). Both variables s and t arent needed as graphs for both functions will be produced later.
However penetrative force Fp remains unknown, and is a constant needed if there is to be any
graphing. Using a study published by students attending the College of Charleston Department
of Biology, the penetrative force can be derived. The study ultimately repeatedly experimented
on cockroaches to find the biomechanical properties of the compounds that make up their bodies.
Through heavy experimentation, the study found the strength of the cockroachs outer shell to be
around 3.64 mPa (Clark, Triblehorn). Given that the study provided a value for pressure, the
penetrative force may be derived from the general expression for pressure:
= 3.64(10002 ) P a = F p /A F p = A
To find A, the area over which the force is exerted, the third assumption needs to be used. Given
that the apple is nearly spherical, it can be further assumed that the area of the apple in contact
with the cockroach shell is nearly circular as well. Knowing that, area can be found by simply
using the area formula for a circle. The radius of this circle is assumed to be 0.02 m, or 2 cm,
A = r2
F p = 4732 N
Using the now-known penetrative force, it can be used as a constant for both functions of
By simply substituting the numerical value into both functions, the next step can be
va(s):
(x: time in seconds, y: velocity in meters per second)
Kim 7
As seen by both functions, the speed necessary to throw an apple fast enough to embed it into a
giant cockroach is absurd. If the apples time of impact was 0.002 seconds (typical time of
impact between a baseball and a baseball bat), the speed would be close to 95 m/s, which is
about 212.5 mph. If the apple penetrated just 0.04 m, or 4 cm, into Gregors back, the apple
would need a speed of around 61 m/s, or 136.5 mph. Although these derivations and
calculations are rough, we can at least conclude that a normal person would not be able to throw
Works Cited
Clark, Andrew J., and Jeffrey D. Triblehorn. Mechanical properties of the cuticles of three
cockroach species that differ in their wind-evoked escape behavior. PubMed Central.
Kafka, Franz, and Stanley Corngold. The Metamorphosis. Toronto: Bantam Books, 1981. Print.
Kobes, Randy. "Kinetic Energy and Work Energy Theorem." Randy Kobe, University of
Zitzewitz, Paul W. Robert F. Neff. Physics: Principles and Problems. New York: Glencoe, 1995.