0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
89 Ansichten2 Seiten
The Supreme Court ruled that the proper venue for perjury charges against Desi Tomas related to a false certification against forum shopping was the Makati court, not the Pasay court. Venue is determined by where the essential elements of the crime took place. For perjury under Article 183 of the RPC, the crime is committed when the affiant subscribes and swears to a false affidavit before an authorized person. Since Tomas notarized the false certification in Makati, the Makati court had proper jurisdiction and venue to try the case, as that is where the constitutive act occurred.
The Supreme Court ruled that the proper venue for perjury charges against Desi Tomas related to a false certification against forum shopping was the Makati court, not the Pasay court. Venue …