Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Optical THE
TRANSMODE
WAY
Introduction
transmode introduction 3
Packet-Optical the Transmode Way, has been written The term P-OTS is widely used within the industry
by Transmode to help customers, prospects, partners and has been recycled from an earlier definition (Plain
or anyone else who needs to have a better under- Old Telephone Service) to cover a range of solutions
standing of the packet-optical world. It is intended and networks with varying degrees of capabilities
to accompany WDM the Transmode Way, which covers and functionality. Transmode defines P-OTS devices
all aspects of Layer 1 optical networking. This book and networks using the classifications developed by
focuses on the integration of higher layer function- Infonetics Research. We have therefore asked Andrew
ality into optical systems to create Packet-Optical Schmitt, Principal Analyst at Infonetics Research, to
Transport Systems (P-OTS) i.e. packet-optical net- give us a short introduction to packet-optical techno-
works. logy and the specific definitions they use in Chapter 2.
Optical fiber provides almost loss-less transmission Packet-optical integration has some great advan-
of signals at an ultra-wide range of frequencies. Packet tages in terms of cost and service differentiation.
switching, implemented according to the Ethernet Transmodes Native Packet Optical 2.0 architecture
family of protocols, offers one of the most efficient takes this one step further and its benefits in terms of
ways for sorting and directing streams of digital data. reduced equipment and operational cost, key capabili-
With packet-optical networking these two outstand- ties such as latency and sync and simplified opera-
ing technologies are positioned to dominate the next tions are outlined in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 then
generation of transport networks.
4 introduction transmode
takes the reader further on into how these values details of the TM-Series, the multi-layer management
are leveraged by various applications, such as Business suite Enlighten, or other parts of Transmodes
Ethernet, Mobile Backhaul and CableTV Backhaul. product portfolio are available at:
www.transmode.com
For those wanting a better understanding of the various
Layer 2 Ethernet technologies, Chapter 5 includes a Unique features of Transmodes packet-optical
description of how these function and how they are solutions are highlighted with this marker throughout
leveraged in wide area networks. the text.
Packet-Optical the Transmode Way has been written The information included is subject to change with-
to enable readers to use the book as needed to out further notice. All statements, information and
research a particular subject or to read the complete recommendations are believed to be accurate but
volume from end to end. Either way, we hope you find are presented without warranty of any kind.
the book informative and useful.
transmode introduction 5
Content Introduction 3
6 transmode
3. Applications of packet- 3.5.2 Transmodes solution for switched 4.5.1 Carrier Ethernet: Ethernet
optical networking 45 video transport 54 as a transport service 68
3.1 Chapter summary 46 3.6 Data center interconnect 4.5.2 The Carrier Ethernet architecture
3.2 Ethernet services for enterprises and cloud computing 55 and terminology 70
Business Ethernet 46 4.5.3 Carrier Ethernet 2.0 Services 71
4. Ethernet and Layer 2
3.2.1 Serving enterprise customers 46 technologies 57 4.5.4 Carrier Ethernet Service Attributes 72
3.2.2 A network for Business Ethernet 47 4.1 Chapter summary 58 4.6 Carrier Ethernet traffic
3.3 Aggregation of IP traffic management 73
4.2 Ethernet basics 58
IP backhaul 49 4.6.1 Bandwidth profiles 73
4.2.1 Ethernet mode of operation 58
3.3.1 IP based services over a common 4.6.2 Class of Service (CoS) and Service
infrastructure 49 4.2.2 Virtual LANs 60 Level Agreements (SLA) 75
3.3.2 A lean and transport centric 4.2.3 Ethernet physical media (PHY) 61 4.6.3 Traffic shaping 76
aggregation network 49 4.3 Synchronization and circuit 4.7 Carrier Ethernet Operations,
3.3.3 The flexible optical network brings emulation services over Ethernet 62 Administration and Maintenance
scalability 50 4.3.1 Synchronous and asynchronous (Ethernet OAM) 76
3.4 Mobile backhaul 51 transport 62 4.7.1 The management framework 76
3.4.1 3G and 4G/LTE place new requirements 4.3.2 Synchronization standards 64 4.7.2 Standards for Ethernet OAM 77
on mobile backhaul 51 4.4 Ethernet protection 66 4.7.3 The service lifecycle 78
3.4.2 A backhaul network optimized 4.4.1 Link aggregation (LAG) 66 4.7.4 Ethernet Service OAM Performance
for 3G and 4G/LTE 52 4.4.2 Ethernet ring protection switching and fault management 78
3.5 Switched video transport 53 (ERPS) 66 Summary 82
3.5.1 Streaming 3D and HD video 4.5 Carrier Ethernet architecture
to the home 53 and services 68 index 83
transmode 7
1. An overview
of the packet-
optical market
by Andrew Schmitt,
Infonetics Research
Optical technology has surged forward in recent years with the move to functionality, which will be explained in full later in this book, includes a
higher speed coherent optics, more optical flexibility with the wide-scale minimal level functionality that must be supported to be classified within
adoption of ROADM technology and the integration of Ethernet func- the metro-edge P-OTS category. This functionality includes provision-
tionality from higher layers in the OSI stack into the optical layer, what ing, managing, verifying and protecting Layer 2 Ethernet services using a
we refer to as Packet-Optical integration. Of these, the move to packet- defined group of standardized protocols and procedures. Of course, many
optical solutions is perhaps the most confusing, as the phrase means systems in the market will support a much wider level of functionality
different things to different parties, be they vendors, operators, analysts than this minimum requirement. There are also some systems that do not
or the media. The variation stems from individual experiences with the meet the required level, but still are marketed as packet-optical systems.
wide range of solutions on the market.
Metro-core P-OTS are similar systems that support all the functionality
Infonetics formed its definition of packet-optical largely through dialogue required in a metro-edge P-OTS system but also support applications
with service providers from many regions and markets. In a nutshell, within the core of a network. As such, they are typically physically larger
packet-optical integration encompasses a range of systems that supports systems that support a larger capacity but must also support switching
a combination of optical and packet/Ethernet technology. After many across the whole chassis or node from any port to any other port, rather
years of tracking this evolving market, and asking carriers specifically how than just within ports on a single plug-in unit that is common in metro-
they define packet-optical, we recently modified and updated our defini- edge P-OTS platforms. These metro-core P-OTS platforms must therefore
tions of the P-OTS market to match the latest trends in the industry, and support centralized switching fabrics for Ethernet traffic and a centralized
we split the industry into two distinct sub-segments: metro-edge P-OTS SDH/SONET and/or OTN switch. They must also support fully integrated
and metro-core P-OTS. ROADM-based optical switching and a single control plane.
Metro-edge P-OTS are systems aimed at applications toward the edge These definitions allow us to track the progress of the industry with a
of an optical network. These systems are WDM-based optical network- clear demarcation between the different systems that are closer to the
ing platforms with integrated Ethernet switching. They have varying edge of the network and those deeper in the network and closer to the
degrees of support for Layer 1 technologies such as SDH/SONET and core. Those at the edge often have features that are very application
OTN, but must also support Layer 2 Ethernet functionality. This Ethernet specific, such as Ethernet synchronization schemes for mobile backhaul
Andrew Schmitt
Principal Analyst, Optical
Figure 1. The future of transport and switching. Source: Infonetics Research. Infonetics Research
The scalability and cost effectiveness of Ethernet has made it the 2.2 The principles of packet-optical
unifying service protocol for modern wide area networking. Increasingly integration
the consolidation of the optical and Ethernet/IP transport infrastructure
within the same network elements has become the means to drive down
2.2.1 Why aggregate traffic at Layer 2?
both network investment costs and the associated operational costs. The
The introduction of Layer 2, i.e. Ethernet, aggregation brings several
additional support of label switching mechanisms (MPLS-TP1) is an extra
benefits to network operators. Traditionally, metro aggregation networks
tool kit to complement Ethernet and to enhance the transport capabili-
were implemented by WDM equipment attached to other equipment
ties and scalability of the network. Supervised by a multi-layer manage-
such as DSLAMs and mobile base stations or to enterprise networks.
ment system, integrating the handling of OSI Layer 1 optical channels
The traffic from these was transported to an IP core network directly, i.e.
and Layer2 Ethernet services, a flexible, cost efficient and future proof
at Layer 1, using fibers in ring or star topologies. As the number of end
telecommunications infrastructure is here and ready to be deployed.
points grew, the central IP core network had to be extended, requiring
more IP routers at more sites and with more ports, as indicated on the
left side of Figure 2.
Figure 4. Layer 1 transport: Ethernet traffic is carried transparently at Layer 1 Figure 5. Layer 2 transport: Ethernet traffic is transported via a Service VLAN
over a WDM wavelength. in a Carrier Ethernet Network extending between operator sites.
A plain Layer 1 transport solution cannot concentrate the Ethernet Since a Layer 2 network can use policing to separate the effective data
traffic being aggregated, which may result in low utilization of the WDM rate offered to a subscriber from the actual line rate available on the
wavelengths. For example, a Layer 1 network collecting Gigabit Ethernet access line, a Layer 2 network can offer a more flexible and granular set
signals that are utilized to a very low extent, will still carry them as if they of transport services than a Layer 1 network. While a Layer 1 network
were 100% loaded. This may lead to unnecessary investment in Layer 1 typically only provides services at the standard Ethernet line rates, such
equipment for additional wavelengths in the transport network. as 100 Mbit/s or 1 Gbit/s, a Layer 2 network may offer much more flexi-
bility, such as 25 Mbit/s, 200 Mbit/s or 400 Mbit/s transport services
In the Layer 2 transport solution the incoming customer Ethernet frames over a physical 1 Gbit/s port.
are analyzed and acted upon by the equipment located at the ingress
point of the Carrier Ethernet Network, before being forwarded. It is pos- The Layer 2 network is intrinsically less deterministic than a Layer 1 trans-
sible to concentrate the incoming flow of Ethernet frames by statistical port solution. The throughput of a Layer 2 network may suddenly change
multiplexing and applying shaping and policing to the Ethernet traffic. due to introduction of a new service or due to changed traffic situations.
The Layer 2 solution can be made fully Ethernet service aware and However, the Layer 2 network can be made to behave in a deterministic way
analyze and act upon Layer 2 traffic. by use of predefined capacity reservations, i.e. by use of traffic engineering.
Unaware (transparent) of Ethernet service information and can only manipulate Ethernet service aware. May analyze and act on Layer 2 control
traffic at Layer 1 information, i.e. can be used to create Ethernet transport services with different
characteristics and QoS.
Lowest delay, jitter and packet loss. Statistical multiplexing implies a risk for delay, jitter and lost packets.
Layer 1 Performance Management based on bit errors (CRC). Layer 2 Performance Management based on VLANs and Ethernet Virtual
Connections, latency, jitter, frame loss etc.
Embedded management channels via overhead bytes in line signal wrapper. Embedded management channels via separate management VLAN at Layer 2.
The Transmode packet-optical offering provides the user of the TM-Series VLANs on a Gigabit Ethernet client port. This enables direct remote
with three principal alternatives for transport of Ethernet traffic: management of Layer 2 devices via the same DCN4 solution as for the
yyPlain Layer 1 transport, i.e. transponders and muxponders optical transport equipment.
that provide 100% transparent Ethernet transport at OSI Layer 1. yyFull Layer 2 transport according to the Carrier Ethernet specifica-
yyEthernet-aware Layer 1 transport, i.e. muxponders that provide tions by Metro Ethernet Forum (CE 2.0 from MEF), i.e. equipment
100% transparent transport but have Layer 2 features, such as providing providing aggregation and concentration of Ethernet and other traffic
information on to what extent a Gigabit Ethernet connection is with a selected set of Layer 2 functions that support the transport
utilized. This enables the network operator to analyze the wavelength task. Such functions are for example IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation,
utilization and avoid unnecessary investment in transponders/ Traffic Shaping and Policing and Bandwidth Profiles with guaranteed
muxponders to launch additional wavelengths. Another unique 4
ata Communications Network used for management and control
D
Transmode feature is the ability to inject/extract management of the network equipment.
The Transmode Native Packet Optical 2.0 architecture supports two types
of encapsulation of the Carrier Ethernet traffic for WDM transport:
yyNative Ethernet framing: The frames of the Carrier Ethernet
Network are transported as is, i.e. using the same framing as on an Figure 7. ODU2e and native Ethernet framing. The two-colored bars symbolize Ethernet
ordinary LAN, when forwarded over the WDM wavelength. This is frames with the control information in red.
Figure 8. Service aware transport enables a differentiated service offering with multiple Figure 9. The OTN signal structure and terminology. The Carrier Ethernet frame
classes of services having different characteristics. is carried as the payload of an Optical Channel Payload Unit (OPU).
Figure 10. Some characteristics of native Ethernet framing and ODU2e framing.
O
5
DU2e is an OTN Optical Channel Data Unit specifically designed for transport
of 10 Gigabit Ethernet and Fiber Channel 10 GFC signals at a data rate of 10.4 Gbit/s.
A Label Switched Path (LSP) is defined between nodes were traffic enters
and leaves the MPLS-TP network. Using MPLS-TP terminology, the entry
and exit nodes are referred to as MPLS-TP Provider Edge (PE) nodes and any
intermediate nodes being passed by the LSP are referred to as MPLS-TP
Provider (P). Often the physical node performing the PE function is called
a Label Edge Router6 (LER) and the intermediate transit node is called
Figure 11. Using MPLS-TP to define label switched paths within the Carrier Ethernet a Label Switching Router (LSR). Transmodes Ethernet Muxponders can
Network.
act as both an LER and an LSR, and also combine these roles.
Principles of MPLS-TP
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is a technique that forwards
packets based on labels as opposed to a standard Carrier Ethernet
network where the frames are switched based on their SVLAN tags
and MAC addresses.
Note that the use of the term router is historic and neither requires
6
An MPLS-TP tunnel is a pre-defined MPLS-TP transport path from the A pseudowire is an emulation of a Layer 2, point-to-point, connection-
source LER to the destination LER. The MPLS-TP tunnel always has an oriented service over a packet-switching network (PSN), from Attachment
active LSP that defines the primary and working path. It may also have Circuit (AC) to AC. The pseudowire used in MPLS-TP is a connection estab-
a protect LSP which define a recovery path. lished between two MPLS-TP Label Edge Routers (LER) across the MPLS-TP
tunnel/LSP with the Attachment Circuit frames encapsulated
Both the tunnel and the LSP can be envisaged as pre-defined circuits for as MPLS data.
information to follow through the network, and consequently tunnels
and LSPs are configured in advance from the network management
system. A key feature of MPLS-TP, which distinguishes it from classic IP
MPLS, is in fact that management and protection are designed to operate
without a dynamic control plane, i.e. similar to a traditional SDH/SONET
network, where circuits are set up by the management system.
The actual data traffic is carried by a pseudowire (PW) inside the LSP/
tunnel. One MPLS-TP LSP may carry one or more pseudowires, i.e. the
pseudowires offer a means for multiplexing of traffic.
A Layer 2 transport service is established between two Attachment Both Ethernet SVLAN and MPLS-TP forwarding techniques have their own
Circuits and the service is carried by a pseudowire. The pseudowire travels benefits and it is often advantageous to be able to offer services based
through the network in an MPLS-TP tunnel. The MPLS-TP tunnel is in its on both technologies. For example multicast services are generally more
turn mapped to at least one LSP, the active LSP. suited for deployment directly over SVLANs on Ethernet, whereas point-
to-point trunks requiring protection benefits more from the MPLS-TP
features.
Figure 18. Key features of Transmodes Native Packet Optical 2.0 architecture.
Furthermore, together with the management suite Enlighten, the Native For example, the optical channel quality information detected at Layer1
Packet-Optical 2.0 architecture provides multi-layer traffic and service may be used for automated decisions on how a particular SVLAN or
management. Depending on traffic load or link degradation, the packet- MPLS-TP tunnel is set up and handled at Layer 2.
optical network can switch between different transport alternatives,
ensuring the highest possible quality of service for the subscribers. Native Packet Optical is implemented through the family of optimized
The tight integration between Layer 2 and Layer 1 functionality in the Ethernet Muxponders (EMXP) within the widely deployed TM-Series
architecture also opens up for advanced management of the traffic. networking platform.
The aggregation and the metro core networks are interconnected via a 2.4.4 The multi-layer service management system
packet-optical platform that can provide switching at OSI Layers 1, and 2. The chosen network architecture has a profound influence on the degree
In the metro core, Ethernet SVLANs and MPLS-TP enables detailed handling of operational simplicity that is possible to achieve when it comes to
of the Layer 2 services while WDM keeps legacy transport services at network management. The real benefits of packet-optical networking
Layer 1. A ROADM7 enabled Layer 1 provides flexible wavelength switching can only be realized with a truly integrated Layer 1 and Layer 2 transport
capabilities, while a unified control plane provides management capabilities platform and a unified Layer 1 and Layer 2 management system.
across the aggregation and metro core networks.
8
MPLS used in conjunction with IP and its routing protocols.
9
For a description of how the optical elements work and are used in a flexible optical
Reconfigurable Optical Add/Drop Multiplexor.
7
network, refer to the book WDM the Transmode Way from Transmode.
2.5.1 Benefits of the packet-optical approach Full service awareness enables the operator to differentiate and market
Implementing a packet-optical network helps the operator attain several higher value services with specific SLAs, increasing the service revenues.
types of valuable advantages:
Figure 28. Using SyncE as a reference for SDH/SONET differential clock recovery.
Synchronization
Network synchronization is the cornerstone of the SDH/SONET network.
Here the quality of the underlying Ethernet network can be critical. Protection
Transmodes Native Packet Optical 2.0 architecture provides excellent To maintain the SDH/SONET protection, the existing ASON and SNCP
Synchronous Ethernet (SyncE) performance due to patented innovations protection schemes are replaced by MPLS-TP and Ethernet protection
in circuit design. options. Protection is supported with MPLS-TP for topologies such as ring,
mesh and partial mesh. Also Ethernet protection is supported with ring
In Transmodes iSFP solution SDH/SONET sync transport is provided (ERPS) and point to point (LAG) options, as described in chapter 4.4.
with the Differential Clock Recovery (DCR) mechanism transferring the
SDH/SONET clock to the transparent emulated service with SyncE as These mechanisms provide comparable protection with equivalent,
a reference in both ends. DCR transfers the synchronization clock to if not better, switching speed performance than traditional SDH/SONET
the emulated service and extracts it again at the far end of the service. protection schemes.
The Enlighten multi-layer management suite provides support TNM provides a centralized system for operations, administration and
for processes in the Operations area of the process map in Figure 30 management of the entire packet-optical network and hides the com-
and comprises the following entities: plexity of the underlying equipment to higher order business support
yyThe Transmode Network Design Tool (TNDT) systems. Its integrated management capabilities also provide the founda-
tion for service management of individual end-to-end connections. TNM
yyThe Transmode Planning Tool (TPT)
increases the visibility of the network and simplifies many repetitive tasks
yyThe Transmode Network Manager (TNM) which increase the performance of the network while lowering opera-
yyThe Embedded Node Manager (ENM) tional expenses.
yyThe Enlighten Ecosystem
yyThe Enlighten Portal
A central element in the Enlighten management suite is the Transmode
Network Manager (TNM), a cost-effective and scalable carrier class,
service, network and element management system based on the ITU-T
recommendation M.3010.
The assurance module discovers and tracks the operational state of the
Layer 2 services and the underlying Layer 1 paths supporting the services.
Fault information is indicated not only on the map but also graphically
for individual paths, links and ports. If the origin of a networking problem
resides on Layer 1, the user can turn to the features in the Layer 1 assurance
module to quickly resolve the problem without having to change system
or interface. The module also presents G.826 performance statistics
for Layer 1.
Figure 34. Software defined networking. Control of the network is separated from the
network equipment and placed in an SDN controller.
The PCE model enables network operators to customize the actual path
computation algorithms that are currently integrated in, for example, rout-
er operating systems. The traditional path computation architecture gives
Figure 35. Network virtualization allows two service providers to see different virtual
networks based on the same physical infrastructure. operators little, or no, scope to radically change or to routinely increment,
path computation. PCE server products provide open software APIs, to
allow operators to customize or replace path algorithms. These interfaces
allow the OSS to influence network behavior via the PCE server, instead of
using direct communications with every network element. The increased
flexibility and openness for customization enables operators to address
the rapid change of pace set by todays applications and traffic flows.
As ICT managers look for solutions, Ethernet services such as the MEF
defined Carrier Ethernet services have emerged as an attractive alterna-
tive to provide businesses with a best of breed, cost-effective, wide area
networking solution for enterprise ICT applications. Ethernet standards
from the MEF, ITU and IEEE have now added features and functionalities
that make Ethernet a WAN capable technology. And the potential of
Ethernet services has already been discovered by industries such as
finance, healthcare, education, government, IT, retail, real estate, legal,
media and more.
13
Time Division Multiplexing.
Figure 37. Forecasted revenues from Ethernet services purchased by enterprises. Figure 38. Transmodes offering for operators providing Ethernet services to enterprises.
Figure 39. Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC) uses a common transport infrastructure
for IP traffic from mobile users and users in the home and enterprise.
There is no need for advanced routing and filtering functions in the aggre- yyPredictable performance, making it easy to maintain and troubleshoot
gation network. Instead a carefully chosen combination of Ethernet yyLow power consumption
switching and optical functions should make the aggregation network
act as a bundle of wires carrying the traffic. Handling of the IP protocol,
including IP/MPLS, should be restricted to as few nodes as possible, i.e. to 3.3.3 The flexible optical network brings scalability
the core nodes and as needed in the access nodes. Such a consolidation Given the rapid demand for more bandwidth from consumers and enter-
of IP/MPLS reduces both cost and operational complexity. Furthermore, prises, the aggregation network requires flexibility to accommodate
the simpler processing of Ethernet frames compared to IP packets in the future growth. Transmodes Native Packet Optical 2.0 architecture
nodes of the aggregation network reduces delay and jitter, while making integrates the capacity of the optical WDM network seamlessly with
all traffic flows more predictable than in an IP network. the Layer 2 switching functions of a Carrier Ethernet network. It is easy
to upgrade the capacity of the transmission links between the nodes and
the switching capacity as needed following a pay-as-you-grow model.
Figure 42. The evolution of mobile devices places new requirements on the backhaul
networks.
Figure 46. Interconnection of distributed data centers via a wide area packet-optical
network. The packet-optical network combines ultra-high capacity, transparent, trans-
port of Ethernet and SAN traffic at Layer 1 with the transport of other Ethernet traffic
at Layer 2.
4.2 Ethernet basics Figure 47. The basic Ethernet frame (FCS: Frame Check Sequence used for error
Ethernet is a family of protocols and networking technologies originally control).17.
designed for local area networks (LANs) in the 1980s but now also widely
used for other topologies and distances. Standardized by IEEE16 in the IEEE 16
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
802.n family of standards, Ethernet has largely replaced competing wired
LAN technologies and is today the dominating link layer protocol in data For Gigabit Ethernet some vendors provide equipment that support a jumbo frame
17
networks. option, where frames can have a data payload of up to 9 000 bytes.
18
Media Access Control.
Today practically all LAN and every WAN Ethernet are based on switched
Ethernet. In switched Ethernet all Ethernet stations have their own, indi-
vidual, full duplex, connection to a central switch (sometimes called multi-
port bridge). The switch has a forwarding table which matches Ethernet
stations MAC addresses with a corresponding switch port, and sends the
frame to the correct destination.
19
he number 2 refers to the second layer in the standardized ISO Open Systems
T
Interconnection (OSI) reference model for data communications.
20
I n CSMA/CD, the devices (called stations) can broadcast data over the medium
whenever it is idle. If more than one station transmit at the same time and signals
collide, the transmission is stopped by the involved stations, which will then wait
for some random time and then restart transmission. Figure 48. A meshed and switched Ethernet.
Figure 49. Three virtual LANs (green, blue and red) each with their own individual
4.2.2 Virtual LANs broadcast domains and interconnected by a router.
The task of the Ethernet switch is to move the frame from one LAN
segment to another based on the destination MAC address. If the address All Ethernet frames in a VLAN have a distinct identifier, called the VLAN
is unknown the frame is flooded to all the switch ports except the identifier (VID), located in a designated VLAN tag field, specified by the
incoming one. This creates one single broadcast domain per switched IEEE 802.1Q/p standard and inserted in the frame by the Ethernet switch.
network, which is a potential problem in larger networks since broadcast The full VLAN tag field is 4 bytes long and contains a Tag Protocol Identi-
frames are propagated and replicated throughout the entire network. fier (TPID) and a Priority Code Point (PCP), which indicates the frame
The problem of large broadcast domains as well as the security problem priority level.12 bits of the VLAN tag are available for VLAN identification,
of having all traffic available at every Ethernet station is overcome by the but two values are reserved, making a maximum of 4094 VLANs possible
introduction of virtual LANs. in one single switched network using the basic standard.
Figure 53. Emulation of a TDM circuit over a packet mode network. The Interworking
Functions provide the traffic interfaces for the TDM circuits.
The Transmode EMXP based nodes can also support multiple rings, so
that several Ethernet protection switching rings may be joined at one
physical location. This makes the EMXP extremely useful for aggregation
Figure 56. Ethernet ring protection switching (ERPS) way of working. The solid line of traffic coming from multiple rings covering many sites, for example
between nodes C and D represents a Ring Protection Link (RPL). in a mobile backhaul network.
The association between two or more UNI:s via the Carrier Ethernet
Network is referred to as an Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC). In the
Carrier Ethernet world, this association is the equivalent of a circuit
and it is the Ethernet Virtual Connection that is assigned the various
characteristics attributes that a customer subscribes to.
Figure 58. Carrier Ethernet attributes as defined by Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF).
The UNI functions are divided between the Customer Equipment (CE) The Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC), i.e. the association between
and the provider edge equipment as the function sets UNI-C and UNI-N, two or more UNIs, performs two basic functions:
respectively. Sometimes the customer equipment does not support all yyConnects two or more subscriber sites (UNIs), enabling the transfer
the UNI-C functions; in such cases a Network Interface Device (NID) or of Ethernet service frames between them.
an Ethernet Demarcation Unit (EDU) belonging to the Carrier Ethernet
Figure 60. Ethernet Virtual Connection types. E-Access Access EPL Access EVPL
(Point-to-Point EVC)
4.5.3 Carrier Ethernet 2.0 Services Figure 61. Ethernet Services in MEF Carrier Ethernet 2.0 and their relation to Ethernet
Virtual Connections.
In the Carrier Ethernet Network, data is transported across point-to-
point, point-to-multipoint and multipoint-to-multipoint EVCs according
to the attributes and definitions of a set of well-defined Ethernet service The four Carrier Ethernet 2.0 service types E-Line, E-LAN, E-Tree and
types which provide transparent data transport between the UNIs. The E-Access target different applications as indicated in Figure 62. E-Line
four MEF-defined service types are E-Line, E-LAN, E-Tree and E-Access. services are typically used to replace private TDM-lines and frame relay
VPNs as well as for Internet access. The other three service types are
A MEF Ethernet Service consists of an Ethernet service type associated used in more specialized applications such as mobile backhaul and where
with one or more bandwidth profiles and supporting one or more Classes several Carrier Ethernet service providers cooperate.
of Service (CoS). A service also defines the transparency to Layer 2 control
protocols and how they should be handled.
Figure 62. Carrier Ethernet 2.0 service types. Source: Metro Ethernet Forum.
The TM-Series Ethernet products are fully MEF and CE2.0 certified and
have the functionality needed to implement all of the four service types
above in a packet-optical network.
Implementing the CE2.0 services gives the network operator a whole new
range of services to offer on top of the legacy layer-1 transport service,
thereby adding new revenue streams to an existing network investment.
Furthermore, implementing Ethernet services, rather than IP/MPLS based
services with similar characteristics, can make the necessary investments
significantly lower, especially if the Ethernet services can be implemented Figure 63. Each subscribed to Ethernet service type has an associated set of attribu-
on the already deployed WDM platform. tes and parameters defining its behavior in detail.
3. Per UNI service attributes such as: Carrier Ethernet defines several traffic management mechanisms,
yyUNI ID and physical interface capabilities: Data rate, frame format which are described below.
MEF 10.2 specifies three levels of bandwidth profile compliance for each
individual service frame26:
yyGreen: The service frame is subject to Service Level Agreement (SLA)
performance guarantees.
yyYellow: The service Frame is not subject to SLA performance guaran-
tees, but will be forwarded on a best effort basis. These frames
have lower priority and are discard-eligible in the event of network Figure 64. Conceptual example with three EVCs sharing the same UNI. The three CIRs
congestion. can always be met, the three EIR:s cannot always be met simultaneously.
yyRed: The service frame is to be discarded at the UNI by the traffic policer.
Ingress bandwidth profiles can be applied per UNI (all traffic regardless
Bandwidth profiles can be defined per Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC) of VLAN tag or EVC ID) or more granular on an EVC basis or even based on
and per Class of Service (see below for definition) and are governed by a Class of Service marking such as a customer applied VLAN priority tag.
a set of parameters, the most important being:
yyCommitted Information Rate (CIR) which defines the assured band-
width expressed as bits per second.
yyExcess Information Rate (EIR) which defines temporary extra band-
width that may be temporarily used expressed as bits per second.
yyCommitted Burst Size (CBS) and Excess Burst Size (EBS) which define
temporary bursts of information that can be handled.
26
service frame is a subscriber Ethernet frame to be forwarded by a service in the
A
Figure 65. Three types of bandwidth profiles are defined in MEF 10.1.
Carrier Ethernet.
Figure 66. Examples of Service Level Agreements for different applications. Source: Metro Ethernet Forum.
Traffic shaping is done by imposing additional delay on some packets such Furthermore, an end-to-end wide area Ethernet service, i.e. an Ethernet
that the traffic conforms to a given bandwidth profile. Traffic shaping Virtual Connection (EVC), often involves one or more carriers/network
provides a means to control the volume of traffic being sent out on an operators providing the underlying transmission capacity in addition to
interface in a specified period (bandwidth throttling), and the maximum the Ethernet service provider. Carrier Ethernet OAM requires coordination
rate at which the traffic is sent (rate limiting). of OAM performed by a number of administrative entities and by differ-
ent technical systems.
A drawback with traffic shaping is increased latency and jitter for the
Ethernet Virtual Connection but the gain can be better throughout, since
the overall flow of frames may be improved: Instead of dropping traffic 4.7.1 The management framework
in a policer, it may be better to shape the traffic to make sure no frames Ethernet OAM builds on an established management framework and
are lost (or at least as few as possible), avoiding retransmissions at higher terminology using the concept of a data model, the Management Infor-
protocol layers. mation Base (MIB), describing the status of the individual elements in the
managed network.
Figure 68. The Ethernet OAM framework and terminology. Figure 69. Standards for Carrier Ethernet OAM.
Figure 70. The life cycle of an Ethernet Service according to Metro Ethernet Forum.
Some of the involved standards have been indicated.
The concepts of the SOAM reference model are summarized by Figure 72,
indicating the six default MEG levels considered by MEF.
82 Summary transmode
index
1 E G
10-Gigabit Ethernet (10GbE) 62 E-Access 71 G.8032 66
egress bandwidth profile 73 G.805 38
A
E-LAN 71 G.809 38
active LSP 23
E-Line 71 G.8262 64
aggregation network 28
Enlighten 33, 36 Generic Framing Procedure (GFP) 19
applications 46
Ethernet 58 Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) 61
asynchronous transport 62
Ethernet Demarcation Unit (EDU) 28, 70
Attachment Circuit (AC) 23 I
Ethernet frame 58
Automatic Protection Switching (APS) 66 IEEE 1588v2 64, 65
Ethernet MAC (ETH) layer 69
IEEE 802.1ag 78
B Ethernet mode of operation 58
IEEE 802.3ad 66
bandwidth profile 71, 73 Ethernet Muxponder (EMXP) 27, 29
IEEE 802.3ah 77
Business Ethernet 46 Ethernet physical media 61
ingress bandwidth profile 73
Business Process Framework (eTOM) 36 Ethernet protection 66
Intelligent SFP (iSFP) 34
Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (ERPS) 60, 66
C interworking function (IWF) 63
Ethernet service attribute 72
Carrier Ethernet 68, 69, 70 IP backhaul 49
Ethernet service attribute parameter 72
Carrier Ethernet Network 70
Ethernet Synchronization Messaging Channel J
Carrier Ethernet Services 71
(ESMC) 65 jitter 32
Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision
Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC) 70
Detection (CSMA/CD) 59 L
eTOM 37
circuit emulation service 64 Label Edge Router (LER) 22
E-Tree 71
Class of Service (CoS) 74, 75 Label Switching Router (LSR) 22
Excess Burst Size (EBS) 74
cloud computing 55 latency 32
Excess Information Rate (EIR) 74
Committed Burst Size (CBS) 74 Layer 1 transport 16
External Network to Network Interface (ENNI) 70
Committed Information Rate (CIR) 74 Layer 2 58
control plane 41 F Layer 2 (Ethernet) transport. 16
convergence time 65 Fast Ethernet (FE) 61 Link Aggregation Group (LAG) 66
Customer Equipment (CE) 70 FCAPS suite 38 link layer 59
Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC) 49 Local Area Network (LAN) 58
D
Forward Error Correction (FEC) 19
data center 55 M
Frameworx 38
data plane 41 MAC address 59
full duplex operation 59
Differential Clock Recovery (DCR) 35 MAC address based VLAN 60
differential timing 64, 65 MAC control protocol 59
digital wrapper 16 Maintenance Entity (ME) 79
84 index transmode
Maintenance Entity Group (MEG) 79 Optical Channel Transport Unit (OTU) 20 Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) 60, 66
Management Information Base (MIB) 77 Optical Transport Network (OTN) 20 statistical multiplexing 15
management protocol 77 switched Ethernet 59
P
MEG End Point (MEP) 79 switched video transport 53
packet-optical networking 14
meshed Ethernet 60 synchronization 32, 62
Packet-Optical Transport Systems (P-OTS) 4
Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) 68 Synchronization Status Messages (SSM) 65
Path Computation Element (PCE) 42
Metro-core P-OTS 10 Synchronous Ethernet (SyncE) 64
path-finding 42
Metro-edge P-OTS 10
point-to-point EVC 71 T
mobile backhaul 51
port-based UNI 71 Tag Protocol Identifier (TPID) 60
MPLS-TP 22
power consumption 33 Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) 62
MPLS-TP Provider (P) 22
Precision Time Protocol (PTP) 65, 66 TMF608 39
MPLS-TP Provider Edge (PE) 22
primary reference clock (PRC) 64 traffic management 73
MPLS-TP tunnel 23
Priority Code Point (PCP) 60 traffic shaping 76
MTOSI 2.0 38
protect LSP 23 Transmode Network Manager (TNM) 30, 37
multi-layer traffic management 27
pseudowire (PW) 23, 63 Two Rate Three Color Marker (TrTCM) 75
multipoint-to-multipoint EVC 71
multi-port bridge 59 Q U
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) 22 Quality of Service (QoS) 16, 73 unified information model 39
User Network Interface (UNI) 70
N R
Native Ethernet framing 19, 20 Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) 60, 66 V,W
Native Packet Optical 2.0 architecture 26 rate limiting 76 virtual LAN (VLAN) 60
Network Interface Card (NIC) 59 Ring Protection Link (RPL) 67 virtual network 41
Network Interface Device (NID) 28, 70 ROADM 29 virtual private network (VPN) 60
network management 36 routed multipoint EVC 71 VLAN identifier (VID) 60
network virtualization 41 VLAN tag field 60
S
non-blocking 59 VLAN-based UNI 72
SDN controller 41
O service frame 74 Y
OAM domain 79 Service Level Agreement (SLA) 28, 75 Y.1362 64
ODU2e framing 19 service lifecycle 78 Y.1564 78
OpenFlow 42 Service VLAN (SVLAN) 16 Y.1731 77
Operations, Administration and Maintenance shared Ethernet 59 Y.3011 41
(OAM) 76 SOAM reference model 81
Optical Channel Data Unit (ODU) 20 Software Defined Networking (SDN) 41
transmode index 85
Transmode is a global provider of packet-optical networking solutions
that enable fixed line and mobile network operators to cost effectively
address the capacity needs created by the rapid growth in video and
data traffic. These solutions are important building blocks in next-
generation high-speed optical networks that support services such as
broadband backhaul, mobile data backhaul, video delivery services and
cloud computing. Transmodes solutions are designed to increase the
capacity, flexibility and functionality of metro and regional networks
and are based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) and tran-
sport technologies such as Ethernet. Transmodes Native Packet Optical
2.0 architecture gives customers key advantages such as cost efficient
Ethernet services, ultra-low latency, low power consumption and future
proof network design.
NOV 2013