Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
Learning to read is easily developed by many children during their early years. This
complex process occurs when optimal learning conditions are present. These conditions include
strong language skills. However, it can become an overwhelming process for some young
children, especially those who are identified with special needs such as deaf or hard-of-hearing
(DHH) students (Narr & Cawthon, 2011). Students enter school with various levels of pre-
reading skills; therefore, it is often challenging for teachers as they struggle to meet the needs of
their diverse learners (Cihon, Gardner, Morrison, & Paul, 2008). For beginning readers, students
must understand the alphabetic principle in which sounds are represented of letters from the
alphabet and that letters are used to represent these sounds. Letter sound knowledge is the ability
to produce the sound(s) associated with a particular letter. It is the nearest relationship used in
order to decode, or sound out words (Huang, Tortorelli, & Invernizzi, 2014).
The intent of this study was to examine the effectiveness of implementing visual phonics
on student knowledge of letter- sound relation of kindergarten students. Based on the literature
that was reviewed, there were a number of literacy areas that could be impacted from the use of
visual phonics with kindergarten students. The literature in this review was divided into three
sections, including (a) impact of visual phonics instruction on letter-sound recognition, (b) letter-
sound recognition in students writing development, and (c) parental perspectives and
involvement of childrens education. Each of these sections was focused in this literature
review. After reviewing the literature, I believe that further investigation of the impact of visual
phonics instruction on student letter-sound relations would be beneficial. Much of the research
found the effects of using visual phonics with deaf or hard of hearing students, however, there
Narr and Cawthon (2011) found through a national survey of 200 teacher participants that
using visual phonics as a reading instructional tool increased phonemic awareness, decoding
skills, vocabulary, and reading comprehension for students with or without special needs. The
purpose of this study was to investigate the teachers perspectives of using visual phonics with
their reading curriculum through the completion of a mixed-methods survey. The survey was
composed of checklists, multiple choice, Likert scale, and open-ended questions designed for
participants who had completed the visual phonics training. The results of the study found that
the majority of teachers used visual phonics with elementary-aged students who were DHH or
had other disabilities, but was not limited to this population. Nearly fifty-seven percent of the
participants were teachers of deaf or hard of hearing students, twenty-two percent were special
education teachers and thirteen percent were elementary general education teachers all varying in
the years of experience using visual phonics. Overall, participants agreed strongly or somewhat
that visual phonics improved phonemic awareness, decoding skills, vocabulary, and
comprehension skills. Outcomes from this study suggested that teachers tend to have a difficult
time knowing when best to implement visual phonics into their everyday reading instruction.
Also, teachers at times struggled with learning the system and found they would benefit from
Visual phonics instruction was used with a wide variety of diverse students. In 2008,
Cihon, Gardner, Morrison, and Paul found that the use of See the Sound/Visual Phonics
(STS/VP) intervention in the general education kindergarten classroom could be successful for
hearing students who were at-risk for reading difficulties and were falling behind. The purpose
of this preliminary study investigated the effectiveness of STS/VP with these students. This
study consisted of twelve teacher recommend participants. From those twelve, the lowest five
participants from the DIBELS, 6th edition assessment, of initial sound fluency, letter naming
fluency, phoneme segmentation fluency, nonsense word fluency, and word use fluency were
selected for the intervention. The intervention took place from late March to mid-May. During
the intervention, students were shown the hand sign to teach each letter sound that the majority
of participants were unable to produce. Students were also taught the written symbol for each
letter sound that was representative of the hand sign. The small group intervention that consisted
of two to four students was fast paced and met at least three times per week for the duration of
the study. During the intervention, revisions were made as participant data displayed low levels
of retention. The results from this study indicated that visual phonics was an appropriate
intervention to use with children who were falling behind with the general education curriculum.
At the time of this study it was suggested that STS/VP should be further investigated and that it
This study built on the previous findings from Cihon and colleagues (2008). In 2013,
Gardner, Cihon, Morrison, and Paul researched an additional study that found the use of visual
phonics instruction to be beneficial to hearing kindergarten students who were deemed at- risk of
reading failure. The study took place in a general kindergarten classroom that consisted of
eleven participants. Prior to the implementation of the study, students were assessed using the
DIBELS 6th edition, on letter-sound fluency and letter identification fluency. Additionally,
students were assessed after learning each letter-sound in the general education classroom.
Students who were unable to correctly identify given letter-sounds entered Tier 2 intervention for
additional instruction. Over the course of the study, there were five students who consistently
remained in intervention. During the intervention, students received instruction through the
STS/VP reading instructional tool. Students watched and listened as the researcher said the letter
sound and demonstrated the hand sign. The written symbol of the hand sign was also drawn
under each letter to help students remember what sound the letter made. The results from this
five month study indicated that visual phonics was beneficial to at-risk kindergarten students
While the focus of Chion and colleagues (2008, 2013) investigations were dedicated on
the effects of visual phonics with hearing kindergarten students, Smith and Wang (2010) studied
the impact of visual phonics on the phonological awareness and speech production of a deaf four
year old preschool student who had a cochlear implant. This study focused on using visual
phonics together with a modified version of the Fountas and Pinnell phonics curriculum. During
the intervention, visual phonics hand cues were used to represent beginning and medial sounds
whenever a target sound or word was meant to be heard or said. Modified Fountas and Pinnell
Kindergarten Phonics curriculum mini lessons were also used. The beginning weeks of
intervention focused on naming the letter and sound of beginning consonants. As the intervention
progressed through the fourth, fifth, and sixth weeks, the focus was on learning medial vowel
sounds and eleven new words. The findings indicated that that when visual phonics was used
increased.
A similar study researched by Wang, Spychala, Harris, and Oetting (2013) looked at the
effectiveness of using a phonics-based intervention in part with visual phonics for deaf or hard of
hearing preschool students. Many of these studies presented similar findings for the use of visual
phonics with deaf or hard of hearing students to increase phonemic awareness skills needed for
reading. This study focused on three preschool students who were deaf or hard of hearing. The
intervention consisted of individual or small groups that used the reading program Reading
Mastery 1, Smart Board technology that used starfall.com and visual phonics. Early intervention
lessons consisted of instruction on individual sounds. As lessons progressed, they became more
difficult. Students were expected to orally, or use the visual phonics hand signs, to say the sound
of letters to blend a given word. Through repetition and mastery of the visual phonics hand
signs, students blended and segmented words quickly. At the completion of this 40-week
intervention (50-week in one case), all participants phonemic awareness and phonics skills had
Unlike the previous studies that involved preschool or kindergarten participants, this
next study used visual phonics for ten deaf or hard of hearing kindergarten through third-grade
students. The purpose of Narrs (2008) study was to examine the relationship between
and length of time in literacy instruction with visual phonics (p. 405). The intervention
consisted of students using visual phonics to learn phonemic awareness and phonics skills to
support reading development. Students were made aware of the visual hand sign for the letter
sounds and the symbol that represented these sounds. Visual phonics was used in many of the
literacy activities throughout the day. While students were writing, the researcher would use the
visual hand signs to provide support to students as they worked on sounding out and writing
words. The results from this study found that using visual phonics as an additional instructional
tool supported students phonological awareness and decoding skills. It was also found that
there was no correlation between the length of instructional time using visual phonics with
students performances on various reading skills such as rhyming, decoding, and reading
abilities.
The research reviewed supported the importance of developing strong phonemic
awareness skills at an early age through the use of STS/VP to acquire reading skills. Valbuena
(2014) studied the visual phonics program called Tucker Signing strategies to develop phonemic
awareness skills for twenty-five Spanish speaking first grade students to learn English in Bogota,
Colombia. Tucker Signing strategies were very similar to STS/VP in which students were taught
hand signs for all letter sounds. Tucker signing strategies were implemented for one hour to the
whole class as their reading program three times a week for six months. During the process,
students learned the hand sign for each letter sound. They looked at a word, performed the hand
sign, and made the sound. After viewing the pre-diagnostic and post-diagnostic test results, the
findings indicated that the use of Tucker Signing strategies helped students to develop phonemic
After reviewing these studies, it was evident that students needed strong phonological
awareness skills including letter-sound correspondence to become successful readers and writers.
These phonological awareness skills developed with the use of visual phonics as part of everyday
reading instruction. When visual phonics is used, it is developing phonemic awareness skills for
Writing Development
knowledge can be learned through various home or school literacy experiences. Effective
classroom literacy instruction includes learning the names of sounds of alphabet letters and
developing phonemic awareness skills such rhyming, blending, and decoding of words. Writing
and spelling of words involves students to use this phonological knowledge to match each sound
to its corresponding letter or letters (Ritchey, 2008). Ritchey (2008) examined the development
of beginning writing skills in sixty kindergarten students. The relationship between writing and
reading was also studied. The study took place during the second half of kindergarten with the
majority of data collected in the months of April and May. The study included writing, reading,
and phonological awareness measures. The writing measures included: letter writing, sound
spelling, real word spelling, and nonsense word spelling. Students also completed four reading
measures that included: letter name fluency, letter sound fluency, phoneme segmentation
fluency, and early reading abilities assessment (alphabetics, conventions, and meaning). The
phonological awareness assessment focused on the identification of initial and final sounds in
spoken words and word blending. The results from this study found that early reading skills
From the previous study it was found that early reading skills supported writing
development. Diamond, Gerde, and Powell (2008) found in their study that the more letters,
sounds, and print concepts a student knows or is exposed to, the more sophisticated writing will
follow. Two hundred thirty six low income Head Start preschool students participated in this
study to examine early writing knowledge. Researchers Diamond, Gerde, and Powell (2008)
examined two components of childrens writing: written forms and writing processes. Student
writing data was collected at the beginning, middle, and end of the academic school year. During
the study students completed a number of assessments including name writing, letter naming,
initial sound, and concepts about print to collect and analyze data. It was found that students
made growth in all literacy areas assessed over the school year. An important component of
writing is the understanding of letters and letter sounds. Researchers found that the students who
wrote more letters in their name also knew more letters and were able to pick up on learning
letters faster compared to their peers who were not writing letters.
As I began to imagine how this study would take place in my own classroom, I kept
thinking to myself what impact it would have on my students writing. Because the study
occurred during the fall, I focused my writing instruction on teaching students how to write their
first names. In the previous study, Diamond and colleagues (2008) found that low income Head
Start preschool students who wrote more letters in their name were able to know and recognize
letters faster than peers who did not write letters. Recently in another study, Diamond and
Baroody (2013) suggested that prekindergarten students who were able to write their first name
had a better understanding of letters and letter sounds. This study was done with a larger
participant group of 502 at-risk prekindergarten students and was focused only on writing of
letters in students names and not on conventions. Students were observed from the fall of
prekindergarten to the spring of kindergarten. The following emergent literacy assessments were
conducted throughout the study and were followed-up in the spring of kindergarten: Name
writing, letter knowledge, and letter-sound knowledge (word decoding). On the name writing
assessment, students only completed this during prekindergarten because the majority of students
knew how to write their names already by the spring of kindergarten. Researchers coded
students writing to view the sophistication of skills being used. The letter knowledge
assessment had students identify uppercase letters. Again, most students were able to identify all
the letter names by the spring of kindergarten, so this assessment was only used in
prekindergarten. The last assessment was the letter-sound knowledge assessment. Students were
shown standard English letter combinations and had to read the word by sounding them out
phonetically. This was used in prekindergarten and kindergarten. The results confirmed that
early writing is a predictor of emergent literacy skills. The correlation between these studies was
was apparent throughout a number of research studies. As part of my study, I collected students
writing samples during writers workshop to observe students writing abilities with the use of
visual phonics. The research conducted by Snyders (2014) explored the development of writing
for kindergarten students during writers workshop. Three participants were randomly chosen
for this study and attended an all-day kindergarten program three days per week. Over the 10-
week qualitative study, the researcher collected student writing samples, videotaped student-
teacher conferences, and held participant interviews. Towards the beginning of the study,
students were asked to draw a picture of a writer and then share with the researcher about their
writing. Students were asked interview questions to tell their perceptions about writers and
writing. Students and the researcher continued to confer with each other for five minutes, once
every three days, throughout the study. Student writing samples were used as part of the data
analysis and were collected each week. The results from this study found that the writers
experience, students writing stamina continually increased as they viewed themselves more
confidently as writers.
After reviewing these studies, it was evident the connection between writing development
and knowledge of letter-sounds relations for beginning writers. Early writing was a predictor of
early reading skills. With strong phonological awareness skills and letter-sound correspondence,
Jane Dee Hull, the first female governor of Arizona, once stated At the end of the day,
the most overwhelming key to a childs success is the positive involvement of parents.
Effective teaching begins with building a strong relationship with students parents. In a study
conducted by Rodriguez, Blatz, and Elbaum (2014), ninety-six parents of students with
disabilities were interviewed to discuss their views of the schools efforts to involve and engage
them in their childs education. Focus group sessions took place either in the morning or
afternoon at the school. To remain confidential, no school personnel were present. A total of
seventeen focus group sessions and one individual interview session were held at eighteen
different school locations. The number of participants ranged from one to twenty-one and lasted
approximately ninety minutes. During the sessions, parents filled out a parent survey of twenty-
five questions that would guide the group discussion. All focus sessions had a moderator and
were audio-recorded for transcription. The results found eight prominent themes. The most
prominent theme noted was the extent to which schools collaborated with parents in their
childrens education (Rodriguez et al., 2014, p. 85). Parents who spoke positively of this theme
stated that teachers were accessible, accommodating to parents for Individualized Education
Program (IEP) meetings, and were knowledgeable in answering questions. Parents who spoke
unfavorably about this theme reported having a difficult time getting services for their child.
As found in the last study, parent and school collaboration plays an important role in a
childs education. Sukhram and Hsu (2012) conducted a study that reflected an overview of the
Reading Together Program. This program was designed for parents and children, ages six
months to thirty-six months, to learn basic literacy skills together to help set the child up for
school and life reading success. The results from this study found that parents appreciated the
program and that it helped them to understand the value of these early literacy skills. The
program was for six weeks and met weekly for forty-five minutes, fifteen parents and fifteen
children participated. Prior to the start of the program, parents filled out a pre survey to help
decide the topics that would be presented in each session based on parent concerns or specific
needs. During each of the sessions, facilitators modeled the strategies to be learned for the day.
Parents then individually read with their child while practicing the strategies as facilitators went
around offering guidance and support. At the end of each session, children, with the help of
parents, were able to pick a free book to take home to continue reading and implementing the
learned strategies. Parents also received a handout from the days session recapping the learned
strategies. At the final session, parents were given a survey to tell what they liked best or least
about the program, what they learned from the program, and how the program influenced the
reading partnership with their child. The results from the study found that parents appreciated
the program and were very positive about the support and guidance received.
Keeping parents informed of what their school-aged child was learning while in school
was important to my study so parents were aware of the research that took place. ad and
Gurbuzturk (2013) investigated the involvement of parents in their childs education. The study
involved 1,252 parent participants whose children were between first-grade and fifth-grade in
Malatya province, Turkey. Parent participants were given a thirty-nine question, Likert-type
involvement tasks. The results found that parent involvement was high on communication with
child, enabling home setting, supporting personality development, and helping with homework as
parents answered always. Parent involvement was low for volunteering in curricular or
extracurricular activities, as seldom was the highest response. This study supported the previous
literature reviews that parental involvement was important to parents in their childs education.
One of the last studies viewed was research done by Garbacz, McDowall, Schaughency,
Sheridan, and Welch (2015). In this study, researchers wanted to clarify and test the direct
effects of school year, parent education, family structure, and child gender on parent
involvement in elementary school (Garbacz et al., 2015, p. 384). Participants for this study
included 421 primary caregivers of elementary school aged children in New Zealand.
in their childs education. A demographic questionnaire was completed by all participants. Data
collected from this survey found that there was no significant correlation between the childs
year in school and parental involvement. Findings revealed a positive relation between parental
school involvement and parent education, which suggested that parents who had a higher level of
education were more likely to be involved. It was also found that parents with two or more adults
at home were more engaged with school involvement; however, it did not impact home
involvement or the communication between school and home. The final finding from this study
suggest a trend toward greater home-school communication reported by parents of boys than
Conclusion
From the reviews of literature, several connections were made. The majority of the
studies took place with students who were deemed at-risk of reading failure and who were deaf
or hard of hearing. There had not yet been much researched on the effects of visual phonics with
hearing students. It was evident that students need strong phonological awareness skills
including letter-sound correspondence to become successful readers and writers. These
phonological awareness skills took place with the use of visual phonics as part of everyday
reading instruction. The literature I reviewed found that when visual phonics was used,
phonemic awareness skills developed for students who were at-risk for reading failure. Those
early reading skills also supported the development of beginning writers. The studies supported
the implementation of visual phonics in my own kindergarten classroom. Overall, the reviews
Cabell, S. Q., Tortorelli, L. S., & Gerde, H. K. (2013). How do I write...? Scaffolding
Cihon, T. M., Gardner III, R., Morrison, D., & Paul, P. V. (2008). Using visual phonics as a
for reading failure. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 5(3), 138-155.
Diamond, K. E., & Baroody, A. E. (2013). Associations among name writing and alphabetic
Diamond, K. E., Gerde, H. K., & Powell, D. R. (2008). Development in early literacy skills
during the pre-kindergarten year in head start: Relations between growth in children's
writing and understanding of letters. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 467-
478. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.05.002
Garbacz, S. A., McDowall, P. S., Schaughency, E., Sheridan, S. M., & Welch, G. W. (2015). A
Gardner, R., Cihon, T. M., Morrison, D., & Paul, P. (2013). Implementing visual phonics with
hearing kindergarteners at risk for reading failure. Preventing School Failure, 57(1), 30-
42. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2011.654365
Huang, F. L., Tortorelli, L. S., & Invernizzi, M. A. (2014). An investigation of factors associated
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/janedhull224522.html
Montgomery, J. (2008). Dave krupke: What exactly is visual phonics? Communication Disorders
Narr, R. F., & Cawthon, S. W. (2011). The wh questions of visual phonics: What, who, where,
when, and why. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 16(1), 66-78.
doi:10.1093/deafed/enq038
who use visual phonics. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(3), 405-416.
Ritchey, K. D. (2008). The building blocks of writing: Learning to write letters and spell words.
Rodriguez, R. J., Blatz, E. T., & Elbaum, B. (2014). Parents views of schools involvement
ad, S. N., & Gurbuzturk, O. (2013). Primary school students' parents' level of involvement into
their children's education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1006-1011.
Skibbe, L. E., Hindman, A. H., Connor, C. M., Housey, M., & Morrison, F. J. (2013). Relative
doi:10.1080/10409289.2012.712888
Smith, A., & Wang, Y. (2010). The impact of visual phonics on the phonological awareness and
speech production of a student who is deaf: A case study. American Annals of the Deaf,
155(2), 124-130.
Snyders, C.S. (2014). 'I wish we could make books all day!' An observational study of
Sukhram, D., & Hsu, A. (2012). Developing reading partnerships between parents and children:
awareness in children. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, (8), 66-82.
Wang, Y., Spychala, H., Harris, R. S., & Oetting, T. L. (2013). The effectiveness of a phonics-
based early intervention for deaf and hard of hearing preschool children and its possible
impact on reading skills in elementary school: A case study. American Annals of the