Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Edwards
English 2
16 March, 2017
William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar is filled with dramatic text. Marc Antonys,
and Brutuss speeches are distinctly filled with Pathos, Ethos, and Logos driven
statements. Both speeches use many forms of persuasive techniques to attract the
plebeians to their sides effectively. Antony, however, is able to influence the crowd
significantly more, because of his use of persuasive techniques. While both Brutus and
Antonys speeches use Pathos, Ethos, Logos persuasive techniques, they differ by the
amount they use of each. Brutus comes off more logically to the crowd. While Antony
triggers an emotional response by using more pathos and ethos forms of persuasion.
Antony was more effective because he persuaded the mob by using a majority of
pathos and ethos persuasive techniques, along with logos. Antony was able to get the
mob on his side by being dramatic and showing his emotions. He tells the crowd My
heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me(
3.2.116-117). This appeals to the mobs emotional side and makes him more likeable.
Along with Antony speaking with pathos, he uses Caesar's body to prove his point even
more. Before revealing Caesar's dead body to the plebeians he tells them O, now you
weep, and I perceive you feel the dint of pity (3.2.205-206). He talks to the crowd about
how they are feeling and shows them Caesars body to elicit a bigger response. This
was an example of elevated language because he is using formal words. Antony's
speech also had a large amount of ethos in it. Antony uses ethos when he tells the
plebeians multiple times that Brutus says he (Caesar) was ambitious, and Brutus is an
mentions things Caesar has done that dont fit with the theme of being ambitious. Such
as refusing the crown three times. Antony includes logos when he tells the crowd
Caesar is marred as you see with traitors(3.2.209). He tells them that Caesars body
was spoiled by the traitors. The traitors being the conspirators. Then after the crowd
responds he tells them they are wise and honorable (3.2.226). Once again meaning
the conspirators. This is an example of logos because he called the conspirators traitors
and later calls them honorable. This is loaded language because he does not really
mean they are honorable. By pointing out that the conspirators have marred Caesar,
the mob knows that when Antony calls them honorable he is being sarcastic. Antony's
use of ethos, pathos, and logos in the end make his speech more effective.
rhetorical questions and repetition to get his point across. Brutus asks the mob had you
rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves?(3.2.24-25). This rhetorical question
was used so he could show the logic behind killing Caesar. However, while Brutus uses
plenty of logos, he uses very little ethos and pathos. He does not show a lot of emotion,
which would be catering to pathos. Brutus also does not include much about ethos, or
proving his credibility. Brutus speech is significantly shorter than Antonys. A very large
portion of his speech is solely based on bringing logic into his actions, with the use of
repetition and rhetorical questions. He focuses more on logos which is why his speech
Brutus and Antonys speeches are similar because they both are able to sway
the mobs opinions. Their speeches each are different lengths. Brutus takes less time to
persuade the crowd to support him. Antony takes a longer time, but has a more drastic
effect. At the end of Brutus speech the plebeians cheer for him to receive a statue and
even be crowned like they planned Caesar to be. At the end of Antonys speech the
mob is in much more of a riot. They plan to with the brands fire the traitors
houses(3.2.269). Antony stirs them so much they decide to take pieces of burning
wood and burn down the conspirators houses. Including Brutus, who they just cheered
for a few minutes ago. The mob planning to attack Brutus, and the rest of the
conspirators, shows that Antony was able to persuade them more than Brutus.
Brutus and Antony are both able to move the mob by their use of
pathos,ethos,and logos. However Antony is able to stir them more by using a larger
amount of each. By showing emotion, proving his credibility, and using loaded language
Antony is able to move the plebeians to rise against the conspirators, and fight against
them.