Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • 10-07-22 10-07-22 Galdjie V Darwish (B179667) - California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - Pretense Appeal #2 S

    Hochgeladen von

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    54 Ansichten10 Seiten
    10-07-22 Galdjie v Darwish (B179667) – pretense Appeal at the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District – records from the online public access system. TOC Executive Summary of Complaint filed with US Attorney Office. 1. Case Summary 2. Trial Court 3. Parties and Attorneys 4. Docket (Register of Actions) 5. Schedule 6. Briefs 7. Disposition Executive Summary Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights. Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal. Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”. Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding Comments 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…” 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing Receiver. The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third - voluntarily dismissed. California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order. Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed: a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002. b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all. c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District Appeal # “Judgment Date” * Notice of Appeal Trial Court Judge California Court of Appeal Justices Disposition 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, DanielVogel, Charles (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinalSigned Published113 Cal.App.4th 1331 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, DanielEpstein, Norman (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in f

    Originaltitel

    10-07-22 10-07-22 Galdjie v Darwish (B179667) - California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - Pretense Appeal #2 s

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    10-07-22 Galdjie v Darwish (B179667) – pretense Appeal at the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District – records from the online public access system. TOC Executive Summary of Complaint filed with US Attorney Office. 1. Case Summary 2. Trial Court 3. Parties and Attorneys 4. Docket (Register of Actions) 5. Schedule 6. Briefs 7. Disposition Executive Summary Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights. Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal. Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”. Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding Comments 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…” 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing Receiver. The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third - voluntarily dismissed. California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order. Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed: a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002. b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all. c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District Appeal # “Judgment Date” * Notice of Appeal Trial Court Judge California Court of Appeal Justices Disposition 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, DanielVogel, Charles (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinalSigned Published113 Cal.App.4th 1331 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, DanielEpstein, Norman (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in f

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    54 Ansichten10 Seiten

    10-07-22 10-07-22 Galdjie V Darwish (B179667) - California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - Pretense Appeal #2 S

    Hochgeladen von

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    10-07-22 Galdjie v Darwish (B179667) – pretense Appeal at the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District – records from the online public access system. TOC Executive Summary of Complaint filed with US Attorney Office. 1. Case Summary 2. Trial Court 3. Parties and Attorneys 4. Docket (Register of Actions) 5. Schedule 6. Briefs 7. Disposition Executive Summary Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights. Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal. Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”. Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding Comments 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…” 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing Receiver. The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third - voluntarily dismissed. California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order. Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed: a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002. b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all. c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District Appeal # “Judgment Date” * Notice of Appeal Trial Court Judge California Court of Appeal Justices Disposition 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, DanielVogel, Charles (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinalSigned Published113 Cal.App.4th 1331 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, DanielEpstein, Norman (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in f

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 10

    Digitally signed

    by Joseph Zernik
    Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
    Zernik, o, ou,
    PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
    Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
    Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2010.07.22
    15:11:23 +03'00'
    Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

    10-07-22 Galdjie v Darwish (B179667) – pretense Appeal at the California Court of


    Appeals, 2nd District – records from the online public access system.

    TOC
    Executive Summary of Complaint filed with US Attorney Office.
    1. Case Summary
    2. Trial Court
    3. Parties and Attorneys
    4. Docket (Register of Actions)
    5. Schedule
    6. Briefs
    7. Disposition
    Executive Summary 1
    Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert
    (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging
    public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish
    (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and
    racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court.
    Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of
    Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer
    Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public
    corruption and deprivation of rights.
    Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk
    colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and
    racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on
    the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge”
    conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a
    declaration that it was Judge John Segal.
    Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner
    required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”.
    Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los
    Angeles Superior Court
    Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Comments
    Proceeding
    1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment.
    “As to the first cause of action, the court
    enters judgment in favor of defendants and
    against plaintiff…”
    2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing
    Receiver.

    1
    For ease of access to the hyperlinks provided in instant complaint, an online copy was also posted online at:
    z Page 2/2 July 22, 2010 TOC

    The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third
    - voluntarily dismissed.
    California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when
    Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order.
    Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed:
    a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither
    proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as
    December 19, 2002.
    b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all.
    c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or
    filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow”
    nd
    Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2
    District
    Appeal # “Judgment Notice of Trial Court California Court of Appeal Disposition
    Date” * Appeal Judge Justices
    1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, Daniel Affirmed in full
    Vogel, Charles (Concur) Final
    Hastings, J. (Concur) Signed Published
    113 Cal.App.4th 1331
    2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, Daniel Affirmed in full
    Epstein, Norman (Concur) Final
    Hastings, J. (Concur)
    3 B191327 04/26/06 05/18/06 Segal, John None Listed Voluntary dismissal
    Final
    * The public access system of the California Court of Appeal does not list any Dates of Entry of Judgments
    The complaint alleged that the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, in the conducted such pretense appeals committed
    numerous serious violations of the law.
    The complaint further alleged that the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, through a series of decisions over more
    than a decade colluded with the Los Angeles Superior Court in ambiguation of both entry of judgment and notice of entry
    of judgment.
    The complaint further alleged that in such pretense appeals, the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, joined forces with
    the Los Angeles Superior Court in efforts to establish “oral modifications of real estate contracts” as permitted by law.
    Los Angeles County was distinguished already in the early 2000s in FBI reports as “ the epicenter of the epidemic of real
    estate and mortgage fraud”. The complaint alleged that the courts themselves were central in propelling the County to
    such distinction.
    The complaint further noted that the online public access system of the California Courts of Appeals failed to include any
    registration of the Dates of Entry of Judgments. Therefore, the online public access system was alleged as the enabling
    tool for racketeering by collusion of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District.
    The complaint against the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, was copied to the United Nations and the US State
    Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses
    by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and
    report are scheduled for November 2010.
    Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the
    justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special
    emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of
    integrity of the justice system in the United States.
    _______________
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Disposition
    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B179667
    Description: Affirmed in full
    Date: 11/09/2005
    Status: Final
    Publication Status: Signed Unpublished
    Author: Curry, Daniel
    Participants: Epstein, Norman (Concur)
    Hastings, J. (Concur)
    Case Citation:

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/disposition.cf… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Future Scheduled Actions


    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B179667

    No information found.

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/…/scheduledActions.cfm?di… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Briefs
    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B179667
    Due Date Party and
    Brief Notes
    Date Filed Attorney
    Appellant's appendix 05/04/2005 Plaintiff and Appellant: Attorney: Ezer,
    and opening brief filed. Galdjie, Manouchehr Mitchel 1 VOL.
    Party: Galdjie,
    Attorney: Mitchel J. Manouchehr
    Ezer
    Respondent's brief. 06/29/2005 Defendant and Attorney:
    Respondent: Darwish, Green, G.
    Barbara Party:
    Darwish,
    Attorney: G. Richard Barbara
    Green
    Appellant's reply brief. 07/11/2005 Plaintiff and Appellant: Attorney: Ezer,
    Galdjie, Manouchehr Mitchel
    Party: Galdjie,
    Attorney: Mitchel J. Manouchehr
    Ezer

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/briefing.cfm?d… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Docket (Register of Actions)


    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B179667
    Date Description Notes
    12/07/2004 Notice of appeal N/A 11/24/04 Galdjie
    lodged/received.
    12/10/2004 Petition for writ of temporary stay requested. (1 volume of
    supersedeas filed. exhibits filed in support of
    the petition).
    12/14/2004 Civil case information
    statement filed.
    12/15/2004 Petition summarily denied by
    order.
    01/15/2005 Notice per rule 5.1 - with
    reporter's transcript.
    04/15/2005 Record on appeal filed. R-1 (15 pages) rule 5.1 (n/a 11/24/04)
    05/04/2005 Appellant's appendix and Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel 1 VOL.
    opening brief filed. Party: Galdjie, Manouchehr
    06/07/2005 Respondent notified pursuant All resps.
    to rule 17(a)(2).
    06/21/2005 Returned document for non- Rb of resp. Darwish pursuant to no
    conformance. original signature on signature
    page, word cert. and proof of service.
    06/23/2005 No brief filed by respondent Respondent Pasternak
    after 17(a)(2) notice.
    06/29/2005 Respondent's brief. Attorney: Green, G.
    Party: Darwish, Barbara
    07/11/2005 Appellant's reply brief. Attorney: Ezer, Mitchel
    Party: Galdjie, Manouchehr
    07/11/2005 Case fully briefed.
    08/05/2005 Calendar notice sent. 9-15-05, at 9 a.m.
    Calendar date:
    09/15/2005 Argument waived, cause
    submitted.
    11/09/2005 Opinion filed.

    …ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?d… 1/2
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…
    01/11/2006 Remittitur issued.
    01/11/2006 Case complete.

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?d… 2/2
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Parties and Attorneys


    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B179667
    Party Attorney
    Galdjie, Manouchehr : Plaintiff and Mitchel J. Ezer
    Appellant Ezer Williamson & Brown, LLP
    1888 Century Park East
    Suite 1550
    Los Angeles, CA 90067-1720

    Darwish, Barbara : Defendant and G. Richard Green


    Respondent Green & Marker
    1925 Century Park East
    Suite 1750
    Los Angeles, CA 90067

    Pasternak, David J. : Defendant and David J. Pasternak


    Respondent Pasternak, Pasternak & Paton
    1875 Century Park East
    Suite 2200
    Los Angeles, CA 90067-2523

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/…/partiesAndAttorneys.cfm… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Trial Court
    Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Division 4
    Case Number B179667
    Trial Court Name: Los Angeles County Superior Court
    County: Los Angeles
    Trial Court Case Number: SC052737
    Trial Court Judge: Segal, John
    Trial Court Judgment Date:

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/search/case/trialCourt.cfm?… 1/1
    2/17/2009 California Courts - Appellate Court C…

    2nd Appellate District Change court

    Court data last updated: 02/17/2009 12:05 PM

    Case Summary Docket Scheduled Actions Briefs


    Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

    Case Summary
    Trial Court Case: SC052737
    Court of Appeal Case: B179667
    Division: 4
    Case Caption: Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    Case Type:
    Filing Date: 11/24/2004
    Oral Argument Date/Time: 09/15/2005 09:00 AM

    Cross Referenced Cases


    B163970 Galdjie v. Darwish et al.
    B191327 Galdjie v. Darwish et al.

    Click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case.

    …ca.gov/…/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dis… 1/1

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen