Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Part A:

Please report and interpret the correlations among personality 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Correlation:

Correlations
Active strong determined scared
active Pearson Correlation 1 .723** .584** .327**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 238 238 238 238
strong Pearson Correlation .723** 1 .632** .277**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 238 238 238 238
** **
determined Pearson Correlation .584 .632 1 .113
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .083
N 238 238 238 238
** **
scared Pearson Correlation .327 .277 .113 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .083
N 238 238 238 238
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

1)
Null Hypothesis: there is no correlation between Personality 1 (Active) and Personality 2
(Strong) with regards to satisfaction level.
Alternative Hypothesis: Personality 1 (Active) and Personality 2 (Strong) are correlated to each
other with regards to satisfaction level.

Data Analysis:
A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the two
personalities. There was a positive and statistically significant correlation between the two
Personalities (Pearson correlation r = 0.72, p< 0.01).
So we Reject the Null Hypothesis and Accept the Alternative Hypothesis and Conclude that there
was a strong, positive correlation between the two personalities. Increases in Satisfaction level of
Personality 1 (Active) was correlated with increases in Personality 2 (Strong).
2)
Null Hypothesis: there is no correlation between Personality 1 (Active) and Personality 3
(Determined) with regards to satisfaction level.
Alternative Hypothesis: Personality 1 (Active) and Personality 3 (Determined) are correlated to
each other with regards to satisfaction level.
Data Analysis:
A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the two
personalities. There was a positive and statistically significant correlation between the two
Personalities (Pearson correlation r = 0.58, p< 0.01).
So we Reject the Null Hypothesis and Accept the Alternative Hypothesis and Conclude that there
was a strong, positive correlation between the two personalities. Increases in Satisfaction level of
Personality 1 (Active) was correlated with increases in Personality 3 (Determined).

3)
Null Hypothesis: there is no correlation between Personality 1 (Active) and Personality 4
(Scared) with regards to satisfaction level.
Alternative Hypothesis: Personality 1 (Active) and Personality 4 (Scared) are correlated to each
other with regards to satisfaction level.
Data Analysis:
A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the two
personalities. There was a positive and statistically significant correlation between the two
Personalities (Pearson correlation r = 0.33, p< 0.01).
So we Reject the Null Hypothesis and Accept the Alternative Hypothesis and Conclude that ,
there was a Medium, positive correlation between the two personalities. Increases in Satisfaction
level of Personality1 (Active) was correlated with increases in Personality 4 (Scared).

4)
Null Hypothesis: there is no correlation between Personality 2 (Strong) and Personality 3
(Determined) with regards to satisfaction level.
Alternative Hypothesis: Personality 2 (Strong) and Personality 3 (Determined) are correlated to
each other with regards to satisfaction level

Data Analysis:
A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the two
personalities. There was a positive and statistically significant correlation between the two
Personalities (Pearson correlation r = 0.62, p< 0.01).
So we Reject the Null Hypothesis and Accept the Alternative Hypothesis and Conclude that there
was a strong, positive correlation between the two personalities. Increases in Satisfaction level of
Personality 2 (Strong) was correlated with increases in Personality 3 (Determined).

5)
Null Hypothesis: there is no correlation between Personality 2 (Strong) and Personality 4
(Scared) with regards to satisfaction level.
Alternative Hypothesis: Personality 2 (Strong) and Personality 4 (Scared) are correlated to each
other with regards to satisfaction level.
Data Analysis:
A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the two
personalities. There was a positive and statistically significant correlation between the two
Personalities (Pearson correlation r = 0.28, p< 0.01).
So we Reject the Null Hypothesis and Accept the Alternative Hypothesis and Conclude that there
was a Light, positive correlation between the two personalities. Increases in Satisfaction level of
personality (Active) was correlated with increases in personality 2 (Strong).

6)
Null Hypothesis: there is no correlation between Personality 3 (Determined) and Personality 3
(Scared) with regards to satisfaction level.
Alternative Hypothesis: Personality 3 (Determined) and Personality 4 (Scared) are correlated to
each other with regards to satisfaction level.
Data Analysis:
A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the two
personalities. There was a positive and statistically marginally significant correlation between the
two Personalities (Pearson correlation r = 0.11, p< 0.10).
So we Reject the Null Hypothesis and Accept the Alternative Hypothesis and Conclude that there
was a Light, Positive correlation between the two personalities. Increases in Satisfaction level of
Personality 3 (Determined) was correlated with increases in Personality 4 (Scared).

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen