Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Rhetorical Knowledge:
Rhetorical knowledge is when the writer has the ability to analyze and act on how the
audiences will respond, the purposes, and contexts in creating and comprehending texts. This
first example is from a section in my thesis paper. I believe this is a good example because in the
beginning of this paragraph I provide the reader with the definition of what the superior temporal
gyrus is and I go on to explain how it connections with the information I provided. After I give
the facts, I give my opinion on the topic which connects the information back to the readers. The
readers have real opinions as well so by providing my opinion, I responded to the audience. The
whole real purpose of this section is so that it allows my readers to connect with by writing so
This next example is from my inquiry proposal. I added this as an example because in
this certain excerpt I gave the reader some background information about my topic. Some of it
was fact based and some of it was opinion based. By incorporating both aspects into this section
I was able to connect with my readers more than if I just presented facts. This also shows the
purpose aspect of rhetorical knowledge because its towards the beginning of my proposal. The
specific placement of this section introduces the purpose of my proposal and later my thesis to
2. Critical Reading:
This excerpt was from a homework assignment we were assigned to complete back early
in the semester on January 17th. In this reading it was an article about how a writing class should
go. I depicted the writing as the author wanted the readers to know that there should be more to a
writing class than just lessons on how to write. The author was trying to reach out to the public
and tell them that yes there should be skill work but there should also be lessons on becoming
better leaders. By reading this passage, I was able to decipher the implied impression that she
wanted students to get more from writing classes than what is provided now.
Sydney Oyler
This is an example from a homework we were also assigned early into the semester on
January 19th. It was a passage in our course pack titled Memorial of the 5 Paragraph Essay:
Kevin Snodgrass. The passage talked about how the author was taught at a very young age to
write an essay using the five paragraph essay format. The way he wrote the passage though was
kind of confusing because he personified the five paragraph format and explained it to the reader
as if it were his friend. I had to critically read this passage to even understand the meaning in the
slightest because if I hadnt analyzed the passage, I never wouldve understood that the author
was trying to get the reader to understand that the five paragraph form is engraved in our brains.
Yes, it works in the beginning but as we grow older, we learn that there are other ways to write.
Sydney Oyler
3. Knowledge of Conventions:
In class, we learned how important it was for us to know how to construct a well written
sentence. By doing so, we learned that run-on sentences were never good to include in your
writing. The example I have above is from my inquiry proposal showing how I used a semi-
colon. Semi-colons are used to breakup two complete thoughts that could be separate but make
demonstrate in text citations. The highlighted portion about is a question from my third annotated
bibliography. In MLA format, you must state the authors last name and the page number in
which you found the information on if it is available. In this case though, I had stated that the
Sydney Oyler
author had said this quote in his book so there was no need for me to state his name in the
citation.
This last example of my knowledge of conventions is a small part of my works cited from
my final thesis project. The sole purpose of this example is to demonstrate that I was able to
learn how to correctly order my citations and how to get all the correct information to cite my
sources. A big part of this class was learning how to search for your sources to get enough
information to have a lot of content in the assignments. We were also assigned the task to make
sure all of our sources were creditable. In our annotated bibliographies we had to present the
4. Composing Processes:
This particular example is from the first draft of my thesis paper. During out conferences,
our peers added comments on what they thought we should add or approve upon on our papers.
The suggestion given here was that I should add more of my own voice by incorporating some of
the They Say, I Say templates. After this suggestion was given, in my second draft I went back
and added more of my own voice by agreeing with what the facts said. I do think this helped me
improve my paper because it allowed the reader to hear from me more than my original draft.
Sydney Oyler
This next example is also from the first draft of my thesis paper. Since this was only my
first draft, I hadnt added all of my information to the paper yet and that was very noticeable,
especially to my professor. She commented on a specific section of my paper saying that she
would like to hear more about that topic. When writing my second draft, I took her suggestion
seriously and went back to my annotated bibliographies and analyzed my information. Once I
did that, I was able to add plenty of more information into the sections that were lacking. Once I
added the new information, I had a nice meaty paragraph that had a good balance of facts and
opinion.
Sydney Oyler
This screenshot is a picture of my conclusion for my thesis paper. During the first stages
of editing, I had asked my peers to give me some ideas on how to sum up all the information I
had in my paper. Once they gave me a few points I was able to write this. When the second
round of peer editing came, they helped edit all the grammatical problems out and I had this final
finished product.
5. Critical Reflection:
Sydney Oyler
The above reflections are from my final thesis that was the last big assignment we had to
complete this semester. In the first reflection, it was written before any of my peers had read my
first draft of the paper. I was mainly concerned about my citations, if the whole paper flowed
well together, and if I concluded the whole assignment well. I pointed those specific things out in
my first reflection because I really wanted my peers to look for those certain mistakes as they
were reading my paper. The second reflection came after I received feedback from the first draft
and after I made the correct changes as well as adding more information. When they edited the
second time, they were just as helpful as the first time if not more. This time of editing mainly
focused on the small grammatical errors. I believe reflecting on a paper that was as large as this
one was extremely helpful because it allowed me to see what I fixed in each step of the revising
process.
Sydney Oyler
This reflection was from the inquire proposal assignment. This proposal was supposed to
be the introduction to our final thesis paper so we wrote it before we even started the other paper.
I reflected on how I found this paper difficult to complete because I wasnt that clear on the
instructions. It was the fact that we had to pick our own topic and how we had to make it broad
enough for us to later write at least seven to eight pages on the topic. I did state the fact that once
I finally picked my topic, I started my research and it helped that I actually enjoyed what I was