Rubric Portfolio Evaluation ‘The criteria in evaluating portfolio such as content (50%), formav/style (15%), originality (15%), reflection (10% }< and punetuality (10%) are evaluated throu gh Rubric Criteria 5 a 3 z 1 Outstanding | Very Good Good Fair Poor Content | Wellarganized | Organized Explained the | Fairly Poor (509% eaplanationof | explanation of | contents explanation of | explanation of contents contents contents contents Format/style | Correct Correct Correct Incorrect incorrect (ase format/style | format/style | format/style | format/style | format/style andorderty | andnot but dirty but neat and dirty orderly ‘Gréginality | Noveland | Creative Not new Notnew and | Copled (15%) creative has duplicate Reflection | Well explained 2domainsare | Only cognitive | No reflection 3 domains of (10%) 3.domains of reflected isroflected | of the3 behavior behavior domains cognitive, (cognitive, psychomoor, psychomocr, andaffectivey and affective) Punctuality | Five days “Two days Submissionon | Two days Five days (10%) submission | submission | deadline submission | submission before the | before the after the after the deadline deadline deadline deadlinePortfolio Rubric with Emphasis on Critical Thinking Critical Thinking Beginning Developing ‘Competent ‘Accomplished Indicators Trnalysis of data, ‘Ambiguous ‘Acceptable Char Exact ideas or concepts | Relevant data, deas or | Relevant data, ideas | Relevantdata, ideas | Relevant data, ideas or concepts presented with | orconcepte | or concepts presented | concepts presented inaccuracies, omssions | presented with in cormect and ‘and interpreted ‘and in part ‘minimal iscouracies | appropriate format precily and ‘ang omissions refering to thoroughly within new ‘appropriate contexts | and appropriate ‘contexts ‘Application Incongruous Suitable Pertinent Perceptive concepts related | Application of concepts | Application of Applicaton of | Application of concepts torelevant | (formulas, procedures, | concepts formulas. | conoapts formulas, | (formulas, procedures, formulas, | tc) incorect unsuitable | procedures, etc) | procedures, eto)in’ | at} done in precise procedures, — | oromited al ogether | used appropriately corres and manner using creative principles, themes with few mistakes | appropriate format ‘thought and ‘or theories refering to ‘explanation appropriate contexts Presentation of Limited ‘Simplistic Detailed ‘Comprehensive findings (such as | Focuses on asingle | Solutions, postions, | Explans and ‘Several solutions, a variety of soluton, positon. or | orperspectives are | elaborates on wor | positions. and ‘solutions, perspective wih explained ina mare possible perspectives are positions, or | inaccuracies. cr mitted | simplistic manner | solutions, postions, or | explained in detail wth Perspectives) | arelevant solution, | with few inaccuracies | perspectives correct | supporting information positon, or perspective considering various points of view Wenlification of | Unsubstantiated Realistic Coherent Articulate wellthought out | Conclusion(s) co not | — Conctusion or | Conclusion or solution | Conclusion is conclusions with | correlate with supporting | solution is explained | islogicaland | expressed clearly with supporting | information or evidence. | with asimple consisint wth | wel-thought out details information | “Omitad conciusion or | connection ts | evidence gathered | and explanation solution. supporting ands presented in a | supported by evidence informaton or | mannerthatereates a | gatheredin a evidence wih few | oradible whole ‘comprehensive and inacouracies original manner ‘Synthesis of Unsystematic ‘Systematic Consistent Integrated ‘conclusions, | Conclusions, soltions, | Conclusions. Conctsions, | ‘Conclusions, solutions solutions, or | orideas are presented in | solutions, orideas | solutions, orideas are | orideas are presented fdeas in logical | aconfused manner | are presented in connected and | inan integrated, clear ‘manner appropriate order | consistent with and logical manner ‘evidence gathered ‘and presented in _approprate order Professional ‘Unprofessional ‘Amateur Virtuoso Professional Presentation of | Binder, fie, orperfolo | Binder. fle. or | Binder. ie. or portfolio | Binder, fle, or portfolio Work ‘omitted; Title pape or | portfoio used in | iswel-organized and | is polished and cover page uncuisble or | simple way: Tie presented in Presented in missing altogether, | page presented; | businessike manner, | professional manner, unlabeled sections of | minimal sections | Tile pageorganized. | Tile page organized porto; More than five ‘grammatical rors included in pontolio; few grammatical errors in portfolio information organized into appropriate ‘sections: Evidence of proofreading and attention to deta land makes strong frst impression: Organized sections and logical presentation of information; Eror-fee