What you have understood?

(CB) I’ve understood from this approach is that some ss know english with that
knowledge.They taught them with content language.Ex:It’s used for this
lesson.The ss has a level and with this level we learn how to teach
English.Ex:We teach english by using another lesson such as
biology,chemistry,geography.It’s used for general purposes.Also all 4 skills are
used integratively.The last thing I want to tell about if there is no motivation it
means there is no learning.Action of schemata: means your prior knowledge and
mediation : helping ss while they’re in learning ,they’ve got any problem or not.

(TB) I’ve understood that ss learn everything in a natural context, in the real
situation.For to solve problem.ex: a man has lost in the Germany? What would
he do? How to ask? By using this actions, situations, they teach english.Both T
and ss are interaction with each other .Also we learnt 3 types of activity as ingo
gap, opinion gap, reasoning gap.Info gap activity the one has an info but the
other hasn’t.They have to complete the situation.An opinion activity is you are
about to answer according to yourself & your life experiences.A Reasoning
activity which is used to solve situation with your logic.You have to discover.

(PA)I’ve understood from this approach.It’s related to social interaction.In this

approach ss are learning english at the same time via their real life,real problems
and solutions.A thinker says that “what you learn with your real experince wiil
be residual.”

What you have diffuculty in understanding?

(CB)I had diffuculty in process & product oriented writing.But know I

understood.
Process oriented writing: You give topic but trying to know whether your ss
know about that topic if not do brainstorming etc…
Product oriented writing: Just give an idea to ss to write them an essay or article.

(TB)Here I don’t have anything to difficulty in.It’s challenging but can be

achievable.

(PA)I don’t have difficulty in understanding but if a ss dosen’t have any

problem with the problem which is spoken in the classroom.What will he do?

What you need to study again?

(CB) I guess I need to study observation and principles of this approach.Because

most of main reasons are mentioned there.
(TB) I think I have to study on procedural, notional and task based
teaching.What are they used for? I have to study again this.

(PA)I have to study on experience part.Because all of the lesson, their

procedures, positive and negative sdies are mentioned there.

How can you imply?

(CB)For me I can just say that it’s a good way to teach both English and other
courses.I’ve also learnt like that.Math, geography, chemistry, biologyand
others.It taught me many terms still I can use them while teaching other courses.

(TB)I can say that for this question.Most of parts you can use it.It’s good for
using authentic.Also ss are interaction with each other.They can make peer
evaluation and peer learning.

(PA)This approach is really useful for learning English. Because ss attend to

speak or they want to express themselve in a clear way. We can use by giving a
problem solve to ss to solve the problem in a proper way.

Activity
A1:
The differences between these approaches.
We observe that in CLT they’ve got some life experiences and you have to use
in with spesific situation.For ex: ordering a pizza.What would you order? Your
tone? You’re linguistic words.
On the other hand in this approach.By using your languageand your life
experiences you can solve problems, learn a languge and it’s general.
B4:
In the classroom we can use these techniques.
Information gap: Ss A Monday
Wednesday
Friday
Ss B Tuesday
Thursday
(They have to complete the table)
Opinion gap: What is your favourite singer?
What is your favourite meal?
What is your favourite author?
Reasoning gap: How can we go to Beşevler?
What do you think about this book?