0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
30 Ansichten3 Seiten
The document discusses the tax benefit rule and provides an example of its application. The tax benefit rule states that if a taxpayer previously received a tax deduction for a bad debt but later collects on that debt, the amount collected must be included in taxable income up to the amount of the previous tax benefit. Similarly, if a taxpayer previously deducted taxes but later receives a tax refund, the refund amount must be included in taxable income up to the previous tax benefit. The example illustrates a company deducting a bad debt, receiving a tax benefit, and then later collecting on that debt such that the collection amount is taxable income.
The document discusses the tax benefit rule and provides an example of its application. The tax benefit rule states that if a taxpayer previously received a tax deduction for a bad debt but later collects on that debt, the amount collected must be included in taxable income up to the amount of the previous tax benefit. Similarly, if a taxpayer previously deducted taxes but later receives a tax refund, the refund amount must be included in taxable income up to the previous tax benefit. The example illustrates a company deducting a bad debt, receiving a tax benefit, and then later collecting on that debt such that the collection amount is taxable income.
The document discusses the tax benefit rule and provides an example of its application. The tax benefit rule states that if a taxpayer previously received a tax deduction for a bad debt but later collects on that debt, the amount collected must be included in taxable income up to the amount of the previous tax benefit. Similarly, if a taxpayer previously deducted taxes but later receives a tax refund, the refund amount must be included in taxable income up to the previous tax benefit. The example illustrates a company deducting a bad debt, receiving a tax benefit, and then later collecting on that debt such that the collection amount is taxable income.
obliged to declare as taxable income subsequent recovery of bad debts in the year they were collected to the extent of the tax benefit enjoyed by the taxpayer when the bad debts were written-off and claimed as a deduction from income. It also applies to taxes previously deducted from gross income but which were subsequently refunded or credited. The taxpayer is also required to report as taxable income the subsequent tax refund or tax credit granted to the extent of the tax benefit the taxpayer enjoyed when such taxes were previously claimed as deduction from income.
(b) Give an illustration of the application of the tax
benefit rule. 15 of 73 SUGGESTED ANSWER: (b) X Company has a business connected receivable amounting to P100,000.00 from Y who was declared bankrupt by a competent court. Despite earnest efforts to collect the same, Y was not able to pay, prompting X Company to write-off the entire liability. During the year of write-off, the entire amount was claimed as a deduction for income tax purposes reducing the taxable net income of X Company to only P1,000,000.00. Three years later, Y
Answers to the BAR: Taxation 1994-2006 (Arranged by Topics)
voluntarily paid his obligation previously written-off to X Company. In the year of recovery, the entire amount constitutes part of gross income of X Company because it was able to get full tax benefit three years earlier. Basic; Basis of Income Tax (1996) X is employed as a driver of a corporate lawyer and receives a monthly salary of P5,000.00 with free board and lodging with an equivalent value of P1,500.00. 1 What will be the basis of X's income tax? Why 2 Will your answer in question (a) be the same if X's employer is an obstetrician? Why? SUGGESTED ANSWERS: 1) The basis of Xs income tax would depend on whether his employer is an employee or a practicing corporate lawyer. If his employer is an employee, the basis of X's income tax is P6,500.00 equivalent to the total of the basic salary and the value of the board and lodging. This is so because the employer/corporate lawyer has no place of business where the free board and lodging may be given. On the other hand, if the corporate lawyer is a "practicing lawyer (self-employed), X should be taxed only on P5,000.00 provided that the free board and lodging is given in the business premises of the lawyer and for his convenience and that the free lodging was given to X as a condition for employment. 2) If the employer is an obstetrician who is self-employed, the basis of X's income will only be P5,000.00 if it is proven that the free board and lodging is given within the business premises of said employer for his convenience and that the free lodging is required to be accepted by X as condition for employment. Otherwise, X would be taxed on P6,500.00. Basic; Gross Income: Define (1995) What is "gross Income" for purposes of the Income tax? SUGGESTED ANSWER: GROSS INCOME means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) compensation for services, including fees, commissions, and similar items; gross income from business; gains derived from dealings in property; interest; rents; royalties; dividends; annuities; prizes and winnings; pensions; and partner's distributive share of the gross income of general professional partnership (Sec. 28, NIRC). ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: a) Gross income means all wealth which flows into the taxpayer other than as a mere return of capital. It includes the forms of income specifically described as gains and profits including gains derived from the sale or other disposition of capital. b) Gross income means income (in the broad sense) less income which is, by statutory provision or otherwise, exempt from the tax imposed by law (Sec. 36, Rev. Reg. No. 2). Gross income from business means total sales, less cost of goods sold, plus any income from investments sirdondee@gmail.com and from incidental or outside operations or sources (Sec. 43, Rev. Reg. No. 2). Basic; Income vs. Capital (1995) How does "Income" differ from "capital"? Explain. SUGGESTED ANSWER: Income differs from capital in that INCOME is any wealth which flows into the taxpayer other than a return of capital while capital constitutes the investment which is the source of income. Therefore, capital is fund while income is the flow. Capital is wealth, while income is the service of wealth. Capital is the tree while income is the fruit (Vicente Madrigal et al v. James Rqfferty, 38 Phil. 414). Basic; Schedular Treatment vs. Global Treatment (1994) Distinguish "schedular treatment" from "global treatment" as used in income taxation. SUGGESTED ANSWER: 16 of 73 Under a SCHEDULER SYSTEM, the various types/items of income (compensation; business/professional income) are classified accordingly and are accorded different tax treatments, in accordance with schedules characterized by graduated tax rates. Since these types of income are treated separately, the allowable deductions shall likewise vary for each type of income. Under the GLOBAL SYSTEM, all income received by the taxpayer are grouped together, without any distinction as to the type or nature of the income, and after deducting therefrom expenses and other allowable deductions, are subjected to tax at a fixed rate. Compensation; Income Tax: Due to Profitable Business Deal (1995) Mr. Osorio, a bank executive, while playing golf with Mr. Perez, a manufacturing firm executive, mentioned to the latter that his (Osorio) bank had just opened a business relationship with a big foreign importer of goods which Perez' company manufactures. Perez requested Osorio to introduce him to this foreign importer and put in a good word for him (Perez), which Osorio did. As a result, Perez was able to make a profitable business deal with the foreign Importer. In gratitude, Perez, in behalf of his manufacturing firm, sent Osorio an expensive car as a gift. Osorio called Perez and told him that there was really no obligation on the part of Perez or his company to give such an expensive gift. But Perez insisted that Osorio keep the car. The company of Perez deducted the cost of the car as a business expense. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue included the fair market value of the car as Income of Osorio who protested that the car was a gift and therefore excluded from income. Who is correct, the Commissioner or Osorio? Explain. SUGGESTED ANSWER: The Commissioner is correct. The car having been given to Mr. Osorio in consideration of having introduced Mr. Perez to a foreign Importer which resulted to a profitable business deal is considered to be a compensation for Answers to the BAR: Taxation 1994-2006 (Arranged by Topics) services rendered. The transfer is not a gift because it is not made out of a detached or disinterested generosity but for a benefit accruing to Mr. Perez. The fact that the company of Mr. Perez takes a business deduction for the payment indicates that it was considered as a pay rather than a gift. Hence, the fair market value of the car is includable in the gross income pursuant to Section 28(a)(l) of the Tax Code (See 1974 Federal Tax Handbook, p. 145). A payment though voluntary, if it is in return for services rendered, or proceeds from the constraining force of any moral or legal duty or a benefit to the payer is anticipated, is a taxable income to the payee even if characterized as a 'gift' by the payor (Commissioner vs. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278).