Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASSESMENT
DR MASUMA ABBAS
MONITORING DURING LABOUR
Do not offer cardiotocography to women at low risk of complications in established labour.
Offer intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate to women at low risk of complications in established first stage
of labor:
Use either a Pinard stethoscope or doppler ultrasound.
Carry out intermittent auscultation immediately after a contraction for at least 1 minute, at least every 15 minutes,
and record it as a single rate.
Record accelerations and decelerations if heard.
Palpate the maternal pulse hourly, or more often if there are any concerns, to differentiate between the maternal and
fetal heartbeats.
If there is a rising baseline fetal heart rate or decelerations are suspected on intermittent auscultation,
actions should include:
carrying out intermittent auscultation more frequently, for example after 3 consecutive contractions
initially
thinking about the whole clinical picture, including the woman's position and hydration, the strength and
frequency of contractions and maternal observations.
If a rising baseline or decelerations are confirmed, further actions should include:
summoning help
advising continuous cardiotocography, and explaining to the woman and her birth
companion(s) why it is needed
transferring the woman to obstetric-led care, provided that it is safe and appropriate to do so.
Do not offer continuous cardiotocography to women who have non-significant meconium if
there are no other risk factors.
Do not regard amniotomy alone for suspected delay in the established first stage of labour as
an indication to start continuous cardiotocography.
Address any concerns that the woman has about continuous cardiotocography, and give her and her birth
companion(s) the following information:
Explain that continuous cardiotocography is used to monitor the baby's heartbeat and the labour contractions.
Give details of the types of findings that may occur. Explain that a normal trace indicates that the baby is coping well
with labour.
Explain that changes to the baby's heart rate pattern during labour are common and do not necessarily cause
concern.
Explain that if the trace is not normal, there will be less certainty about the condition of the baby and so continuous
monitoring will be advised.
Explain that decisions about her care during labour and birth will be based on an assessment of several factors,
including her preferences, her condition and that of her baby, as well as the findings from cardiotocography.
If continuous cardiotocography has been started because of concerns arising from intermittent
auscultation, but the trace is normal after 20 minutes, return to intermittent auscultation
unless the woman asks to stay on continuous cardiotocography.
A DVISE CONT INUO US CA R DI O T OCO GRAPH Y I F A NY O F T H E FO L LO W ING R I SK FA CT O R S
A R E P R ESENT AT I NI T I A L A SSESSM ENT (SEE SECT I O N 1 . 4) O R A R I SE DUR I NG L A B O UR :
pain reported by the woman that differs from the pain normally associated with contractions
severe hypertension: a single reading of either systolic blood pressure of 160 mmHg or more or diastolic
blood pressure of 110 mmHg or more, measured between contractions
hypertension: either systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or more or diastolic blood pressure of 90
mmHg or more on 2 consecutive readings taken 30 minutes apart, measured between contractions
a reading of 2+ of protein on urinalysis and a single reading of either raised systolic blood pressure (140
mmHg or more) or raised diastolic blood pressure (90 mmHg or more)
contractions that last longer than 60 seconds (hypertonus), or more than 5 contractions in 10 minutes
(tachysystole)
oxytocin use.
INTERPRETATION OF
CARDIOTOCOGRAPH TRACES
Principles for intrapartum CTG trace interpretation
When reviewing the CTG trace, assess and document contractions and all 4 features of fetal
heart rate: baseline rate; baseline variability; presence or absence of decelerations (and
concerning characteristics of variable decelerations* if present); presence of accelerations.
If there is a stable baseline fetal heart rate between 110 and 160 beats/minute and normal
variability, continue usual care as the risk of fetal acidosis is low. If it is difficult to categorise or
interpret a CTG trace, obtain a review by a senior midwife or a senior obstetrician.
Accelerations
The presence of fetal heart rate accelerations, even with reduced baseline variability, is
generally a sign that the baby is healthy.
Do not use maternal facial oxygen therapy for intrauterine fetal resuscitation, because it may harm the baby
(but it can be used where it is administered for maternal indications such as hypoxia or as part of
preoxygenation before a potential anaesthetic).
Do not offer amnioinfusion for intrauterine fetal resuscitation.
If the cardiotocograph trace is pathological, offer digital fetal scalp stimulation. If this leads to an acceleration
in fetal heart rate, only continue with fetal blood sampling if the cardiotocograph trace is still pathological.
If digital fetal scalp stimulation (during vaginal examination) leads to an acceleration in fetal heart rate, regard
this as a sign that the baby is healthy. Take this into account when reviewing the whole clinical picture.
PHYSIOLOGY OF FETAL HEART RATE
DECELERATIONS
KEY LEARNING POINTS
It is important to remember the following learning points regarding EFM:
it is used to identify intrapartum hypoxia a significant cause of fetal death and disability; fetal hypoxia can lead on to fetal
asphyxia and death
it should not be used unless indicated as it increases the rates of caesarean section and instrumental delivery in low-risk
women
it has become an integral component of labour management in high-risk women.
Fetal hypoxia is a major cause for perinatal death, neonatal morbidity and neurodevelopmental disability. Hypoxic brain
injury or death of the fetus accounts for nearly 38% of claims handled by the Medical Defense Union and Medical
Protection Society in the UK. The effect of hypoxia on the fetal brain is reflected on the changes in fetal heart rate
patterns.
Limitations imposed by the use of continuous EFM:
reduced mobility
possibility that woman will not be the centre of care in labour
increased intervention
variation in interpretation of CTG trace
chorioamnionitis could make interpretation unreliable
litigation; therefore, good record-keeping is crucial.
Remember...
From 26 weeks onwards, decelerations of the fetal heart should be regarded as abnormal.
Intrauterine infection leads to a rise in perinatal morbidity and mortality and, in this context, the CTG is less sensitive
at detecting hypoxia.
No CTG should be interpreted without a full understanding of the clinical picture.
When hypoxia develops gradually, the first features to be noted are the absence of accelerations, increase in baseline
rate and reduction in baseline variability. The worsening situation may be reflected by the deceleration getting deeper
and wider.
In a non-reactive trace, when the baseline variability is less than 5 beats/minute, shallow decelerations of less than 15
beats may indicate an ominous pattern.
Head compression and true cord compressions are associated with activation of the parasympathetic nervous system
and, hence, result in early and variable decelerations, respectively, both of which are short-lasting.
CTG INTERPRETATION AND FURTHER
MANAGEMENT
If CTG is normal: continue CTG or if it was started because of concerns arising from intermittent auscultation,
remove CTG after 20 minutes if there are no non-reassuring/abnormal features and no ongoing risk factors.
Describe decelerations as 'early', 'variable' or 'late'. Do not use the terms 'typical' and 'atypical' because they can
cause confusion.
If non-reassuring: commence conservative measures left lateral position, oral/intravenous fluids, stop
oxytocin, consider tocolysis.
If the CTG is abnormal: Offer to take fetal blood sample (FBS; for lactate or pH) after implementing
conservative measures, or expedite birth if an FBS cannot be obtained and no accelerations are seen as a result of
scalp stimulation.
Inform the consultant obstetrician if any FBS result is abnormal/FBS cannot be obtained or a third FBS is thought
to be needed.
CTG INTERPRETATION AND FURTHER
MANAGEMENT
Lactate (mmol/l) pH Interpretation
A 25-year-old is at 39+ weeks of gestation and been induced for pre-eclampsia. The woman is
now 3 cm dilated after prostaglandin gel six hours ago, and has just undergone an ARM and was
very bloodstained.
You are asked to assess the CTG. Determine the mnemonic (DR C BRAVADO) for this trace:
ANSWER
Where there is clear evidence of acute fetal compromise (for example, a prolonged
deceleration for more than 3 minutes), FBS should not be undertaken and urgent preparations
to expedite birth should be made.
FBS equipment varies from hospital to hospital, and you should familiarize yourself with the
available kit before proceeding.
INDICATIONS FOR FBS
explain the procedure to the woman and obtain her verbal consent
confirm the position and dilatation of the cervix (>3 cm), as well as the station of the
presenting part
ensure that the instruments are to hand and that the pH analyser is functioning
ensure there are no contraindications for the procedure.
FBS PROCEDURE
Place the woman either in a lithotomy or left lateral position with her right leg supported and abducted. Then drape the
area around the perineum to provide a sterile field.
Introduce the largest-diameter, lubricated amnioscope that the cervix can accommodate. Direct the amnioscope
posteriorly and sweep it anteriorly to catch the anterior lip of the cervix.
Remove the amnioscopes obturator and attach your light source. Ideally, the cervix should not be visible. Try to visualise
the fetal scalp clearly.
Clean the fetal scalp with a cottonwool ball dipped in sterile water and spray the scalp with ethyl chloride to produce a
reactive hyperaemia.
Apply a thin film of Vaseline with a dental roll to increase surface tension on the fetal scalp; this encourages the
formation of sizeable droplets of blood.
Insert a guarded blade into the scalp to the full depth of the guard. Do not stroke the blade across the scalp as this may
produce a lesion that is too large.
Collect the blood droplet into your capillary tube. At least two samples should be obtained. The second may be taken
while the first is being analysed by an assistant.
Apply pressure to the fetal scalp with cottonwool at the end of the procedure if any bleeding is evident.
Reposition the mother comfortably and explain the results to her with your action plan.
FBS PROCEDURE - VIDEO
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
FBS result (pH) Interpretation
7.25 Normal FBS result. Repeat after 1 hour if CTG
remains the same
7.217.24 Borderline FBS result. Repeat after 30 minutes
7.20 Abnormal FBS result. Consider delivery
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
These results should be interpreted taking into account the previous pH measurement, the rate of
progress in labour and the clinical features of the woman and baby.
if the FBS result is normal, offer repeat sampling no more than 1 hour later if this is still indicated by
the cardiotocograph trace, or sooner if additional non-reassuring or abnormal features are seen
if the FBS result is borderline, offer repeat sampling no more than 30 minutes later if this is still
indicated by the cardiotocograph trace, or sooner if additional non-reassuring or abnormal features are
seen
the time needed to take a FBS should be taken into account when planning repeat sampling
if the cardiotocograph trace remains unchanged and the FBS result is stable (that is pH is unchanged)
after a second test, further samples may be deferred unless additional non-reassuring or abnormal
features are seen
if a FBS is indicated but a sample cannot be obtained and there is no improvement in the
cardiotocograph trace, advise the woman that the birth should be expedited.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Contraindications include:
maternal infection (e.g. HIV, hepatitis viruses and herpes simplex virus)
fetal bleeding disorders (e.g. haemophilia)
prematurity (birth at less than 34 weeks of gestation)
acute fetal compromise (e.g. prolonged fetal bradycardia of >3 minutes).
QUESTIONS:
You are managing a woman who is 5 cm dilated and showing atypical variable
decelerations on an intrapartum fetal CTG.
A fetal blood sample has a pH of 7.20. The mother now has a thick meconium and the
baby's head is at the perineum.
The partograph should be commenced following accurate diagnosis of established labour. The
expected progress in labour is 1 cm/hr although in primigravid women there are fewer
interventions if it is accepted that progress can be 0.5 cm/hr.
An action line of 4 hours should be used, as earlier action lines increase interventions. If
progress is to the right of the action line, then it is considered to be prolonged and action
should be taken. The NICE guidance on caesarean section states that a 4-hour action line
reduces the rate of caesarean sections.
The WHO partograph begins only in the active phase of labour, when the cervix is 4 cm or more dilated (see
below). However, it is a tool which is only as good as the health-care professional who is using it. The
observations that are recorded will document the following:
O Maternal well-being: record pulse rate every 30 minutes, blood pressure and temperature 4-hourly, urine
output and dipstick testing for protein, ketones (if available) and glucose after voiding, and record all fluids and
drugs administered. If the findings become abnormal, increased frequency of observation and testing will be
required, and intervention may be implemented.
O Fetal well-being: record fetal heart rate for 1 minute every 1530 minutes after a contraction in the first
stage, and every 5 minutes in the second stage. If abnormalities are noted, urgent delivery can be considered.
O Liquor: clear, meconium stained (thick or thin), bloody or absent. Thick meconium suggests fetal distress, and
closer monitoring of the fetus is indicated. Check every 30 minutes.
O Frequency, duration and strength of uterine contractions (assessed by palpation): record every 30 minutes.
O Cervical dilatation: assess at each VE and mark with a cross . Begin at 4 cm.
O Alert line: starting at 4 cm of cervical dilatation, up to the point of expected full dilatation at the
rate of 1 cm per hour.
O Action line: parallel and 4 hours to the right of the alert line.
O Descent assessed by abdominal palpation: this refers to the part of the head (which is divided
into five parts) palpable above the symphysis pubis; recorded as a circle (O) at every vaginal
examination. At 0/5, the sinciput (S) is at the level of the symphysis pubis.
O Hours: this refers to the time elapsed since the onset of the active phase of labour (observed or
extrapolated).
O Time: record the actual time at 30-minute intervals.
O Contractions: chart every 30 minutes; palpate the number of contractions in 10 minutes and their duration
in seconds (< 20 seconds, 2040 seconds, > 40 seconds).
O Oxytocin: record the amount (in units) of oxytocin per volume of IV fluids, and the number of drops per
minute, every 30 minutes when used.
O Pulse: record every 30 minutes and mark with a dot (). O Blood pressure: record every 4 hours and mark
with arrows, unless the patient has a hypertensive disorder or pre-eclampsia, in which case record every 30
minutes.
O Urine, ketones and volume: ideally record every time urine is passed.
DEGREES OF MOULDING OF THE BONES OF
THE FETAL SKULL.
Ideally, the degree of moulding should be assessed across two separate suture lines and scores are added producing a score out of six.
Effacement
Dilatation
Pelvic anatomy.
Clinical pelvimetry is a means of assessing pelvic capacity through a vaginal examination.
Unfavourable factors that may be detected include prominence of the ischial spines
(interspinous width) or prominence of the ischial tuberosity (intratuberous width), narrow
subpubic angle (if this is less than 90 degrees the diameter of the outlet may be reduced),
proximity of the sacrum to the pubis symphysis (can you reach the sacrum with ease). Clinical
pelvimetry is subjective and results must be interpreted with caution.
PARTOGRAPH ASSESSMENT 1
2) What does the shape of the line tell you about the progression of labour?
Answer: You need to manage this delay in labour in order to increase uterine contractions. You
could give intravenous oxytocin (Syntocinon), but this needs to be used with caution in a
multiparous woman because of the risk of uterine rupture.
The partogram below shows the effect of giving Syntocinon. With increased frequency and strength
of contractions, progress is normal and a vaginal delivery resulted.
What would you do now?
Following administration of intravenous Syntocinon there was no increase in cervical
dilatation. What would you do now?
the fetal head is in an occipitoposterior position with the presenting part at the ischial spines
there is no evidence of obstruction (caput or moulding)
there is one-fifth of fetal head palpable per abdomen
the woman is contracting well and the decision is made to repeat the vaginal examination to assess
for progress in two hours' time.
Critically appraise this woman's management.
Answer:
The management could be justified as she has made good progress so far
Some clinicians would advocate the use of a oxytocin infusion to augment uterine contractions
in a primigravid woman with an OP position
It perhaps would be better to reassess the woman in one hour if there is no progress, then
oxytocin can be commenced.
The woman is reassessed two hours later and the clinical findings are essentially unchanged apart
from the presence of some caput and moulding.
The presenting part is now at 0+1 and there is no head palpable per abdomen. The degree of caput
and moulding is greater.
She is taken to the delivery theatre where she is delivered by Kielland's rotational mid-cavity
forceps by an experienced doctor.
DELAY IN THE FIRST STAGE OF
LABOUR
A 36-year-old para 1 presents to the maternity unit in
spontaneous labour at term. In her previous pregnancy, she had
a ventouse (vacuum) delivery of a 3.32 kg baby.
Answer:
If the woman was a primigravida, you would want to commence an intravenous infusion of oxytocin
(bearing in mind that incoordinate uterine activity is common in the primigravid labour)
Most clinicians would be reluctant to employ oxytocin in parous women who show signs of
obstruction especially if they are considered to be contracting well
The findings are suggestive of cephalopelvic disproportion and the woman is delivered by
caesarean section she has a male infant, born in good condition and weighing 4.7 kg.
THE DIAGNOSIS OF LABOUR
A 17-year-old primigravida presents to the maternity unit at 39
weeks of gestation with painful uterine activity. Her cervix is 3
cm dilated. She believes she is in labour, is distressed and
requests an epidural. The epidural is sited.
Four hours later, her cervix is still 4 cm dilated and the fetal
head is said to be 'poorly applied'. She is tired, upset and
frustrated. She demands a caesarean section and this is
performed.
Would you manage her 'labour' differently, and if so, how?
A 36-year-old para 3 attends your clinic for postnatal review. She gave birth 6 weeks ago and has a number of
concerns about the delivery.
She had presented to the maternity unit at 39 weeks of gestation reporting increasingly regular uterine contractions.
It was noted that she had two normal vaginal deliveries in the past. On examination, uterine activity was palpated ('2 in
10') and the fetal head was 3/5 palpable per abdomen. The cervix was effaced and 3 cm dilated. An admission CTG was
reported as reactive.
She was admitted to the labour ward, confined to a bed and continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring was
commenced. Her husband had to go home to arrange childcare for their other children. She was reassessed 1 hour
later and her cervix was unchanged. An artificial rupture of the fetal membranes was performed and she was
commenced on an intravenous infusion of synthetic oxytocin (Syntocinon).
She subsequently developed decelerations on the CTG tracing and 1 hour later was reassessed again, with a view to
performing fetal scalp blood samples (FBS). On examination, her cervix was 9 cm dilated with the fetal head at station
01, in an occipital-transverse position. The FBS results were pH 7.19 and 7.20.
By the end of the procedure, her cervix was fully dilated and she had a ventouse delivery, without analgesia, of a live
male infant. Her husband returned from arranging childcare, just after the baby was born.
Review this womans intrapartum care and critically appraise each intervention. What could have been done
differently?
An admission CTG should not have been performed (see the NICE guideline on Intrapartum Care) as she was a low-risk pregnancy.
Admission CTGs have been associated with increased likelihood of epidurals, continuous CTG and FBS.
This woman did not need to be admitted to labour ward, as by definition she was not yet in active labour (not yet 4 cm dilated). If she
was too sore or too far from home, she could have been offered admission to an antenatal ward for analgesia, with a plan to reassess at
a set time if no signs of established labour, or as required.
When she was admitted to labour ward she was confined to a bed. The woman should have been encouraged to take up whatever
position she found most comfortable in the first stage of labour. There is evidence that walking and upright positions in the first stage
reduce the length of labour and do not seem to be associated with increased intervention or negative effects on maternal and fetal
wellbeing (Lawrence et al 2009).
Following admission to the labour ward, the woman was commenced on continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM).
Continuous EFM compared with intermittent fetal heart rate auscultation during labour is associated with a reduction in neonatal
seizures, but no significant differences in cerebral palsy, infant mortality or other standard measures of neonatal wellbeing.
However, continuous EFM was associated with an increase in caesarean sections and instrumental vaginal births. The woman should
have been allowed to make an informed choice regarding the method of fetal monitoring to be used during labour (Alfirevic et al 2006).
If she had been admitted to the antenatal ward as opposed to labour ward, she could have been left to establish in labour, as opposed
to the intervention that followed. Subsequently, this may have given her husband adequate time to arrange childcare and then be
present thereafter to offer support when she established in labour. Studies have shown that continuous intrapartum support was
associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff, when it began early in labour, and in settings
in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available. These women were likely to have a slightly shorter labour, have a spontaneous
vaginal birth and less likely to have intrapartum analgesia or to report dissatisfaction with their childbirth experiences (Hodnett et al
2009).
In the absence of concerns regarding maternal or fetal wellbeing, she should not have been reassessed after only 1 hour. The World Health
Organization's Principles of Perinatal Care (Chalmers et al 2001) recommend that four-hourly vaginal examinations during normal labour are
adequate.
This woman had an ARM peformed at 3 cm dilatation. She was probably not in labour and the ARM was therefore not indicated. Further, a
Cochrane review recommends that ARM should not be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care (Smyth et al 2007).
The use of an infusion of oxytocin immediately after ARM in parous women is controversial. When employed, it should be used cautiously in
women who are already contracting, as overzealous use may lead to hyperstimulation and subsequent fetal distress, or even uterine rupture.
The decelerations on the CTG may well have been due to hyperstimulation caused by the oxytocin. If this were the case, the oxytocin infusion
should have been stopped and this may have rectified the problem. She had progressed very rapidly in labour (from 3 cm to 9 cm in 1 hour), and
it is likely that even if the oxytocin was stopped, she would have progressed to full dilatation quickly.
The FBS samples were abnormal, necessitating delivery, therefore the use of ventouse was not unreasonable to expedite delivery, assuming all
preconditions for an assisted vaginal delivery have been met (see the StratOG tutorial on Sequelae of hypoxia).
If a ventouse has to be performed expeditiously (because of concerns surrounding fetal wellbeing), no additional analgesia may be required,
although an attempt could be made to infiltrate the perineum with local anaesthetic for comfort (see the StratOG tutorial on Sequelae of
hypoxia). For forceps delivery, ideally a pudendal block should be given.
Appropriate debriefing of the couple after the birth should have taken place, to answer any immediate questions or concerns.