Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
020
Dr. Kay Byun
Madison Bolton
Michal Hicks
Yansy Perez
Esmeralda Reyes
Table of Contents
Executive Summary2
Purpose and Background2
Survey Research Design2
Sample Description3
Variable Measurement and Description4
Data analysis and Results 10
Managerial Implications13
Conclusion14
Reflection14
References15
Appendix: Survey Questionnaires15
1
Executive Summary
The purpose of this survey was to investigate the consumer decision-making
process when choosing a restaurant. It investigates consumer psychology
and behavior related to restaurant experiences. The survey also explores
which factors consumers enjoy or dislike when attending a restaurant. An
exploratory research design using convenience sampling was utilized to
complete the survey. Key findings in the results suggest both male and
female consumers rely on word-of-mouth restaurant reviews before dining
out, male consumers value entertainment as part of their experience more
than women, and women are more susceptible to writing a positive review.
These results can help managers in their marketing techniques by targeting
the most appropriate consumers for their restaurants. Nonetheless, for all
consumers the most important aspect they looked for in the restaurant
experience was good food and service.
2
3
Sample Description
We had a total sample size of 155. However, after filtering out incomplete
responses the total usable sample size was reduced to 116. The sample size
was compromised o 85 females (73%) and 31 (27%) males as shown in
Figure 1.
Gender
27% Male
Female
73%
Figure 1.
The largest age group from the sample size was 18-24 followed by 25-35.
The two groups together accounted for more than half of the total sample
size as shown in Figure 2.
Age
under 18
18-24
25-34
3% 1% 1%
9% 35-44
35% 45-54
19% 55-64
65-74
9% 75-84
23% 85 or older
Figure 2.
4
In order to assess the essentiality of responses, we asked the filter question
How often do you eat out (during a one month period)? The results are
shown in Figure 3. Each category was almost evenly divided by the three
answer choices.
Figure 3.
5
Apply the appropriate percentages to the following factors depending 1 0 100 19.1 14.793
on importance (totaling to 1...-Price 1 2
5
How likely are you to return to a restaurant if..-You had bad service 1 1 5 2.65 1.081
1
How likely are you to return to a restaurant if..-You didn't like the food 1 1 5 1.68 .974
1
How likely are you to return to a restaurant if..-Staff made you feel 1 1 5 1.97 .950
uncomfortable 1
How likely are you to return to a restaurant if..-You found something 1 1 5 1.83 .989
in your food (hair, plastic, etc...) 1
How likely are you to return to a restaurant if..-The restaurant looked 1 1 5 1.41 .895
dirty or you got sick 1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Texas 1 1 5 1.78 1.231
Roadhouse 1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Texas 7 1 1 1.00 .000
Roadhouse-Food 9
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Texas 2 1 1 1.00 .000
Roadhouse-Customer Service 8
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Texas 2 1 1 1.00 .000
Roadhouse-Ambience 1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Texas 1 1 1 1.00 .000
Roadhouse-Location 3
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Olive Garden 1 1 5 1.91 1.063
1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Olive Garden- 8 1 1 1.00 .000
Food 0
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Olive Garden- 3 1 1 1.00 .000
Customer Service 0
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Olive Garden- 2 1 1 1.00 .000
Ambience 0
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Olive Garden- 1 1 1 1.00 .000
Location 1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-On The Border 1 1 5 2.47 1.247
1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-On The Border- 6 1 1 1.00 .000
Food 6
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-On The Border- 1 1 1 1.00 .000
Customer Service 6
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-On The Border- 1 1 1 1.00 .000
Ambience 3
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-On The Border- 2 1 1 1.00 .000
Location 0
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Other 1 1 5 1.65 1.174
1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Other-Food 7 1 1 1.00 .000
4
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Other- 3 1 1 1.00 .000
Customer Service 3
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Other- 2 1 1 1.00 .000
Ambience 1
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-Other-Location 2 1 1 1.00 .000
8
How likely are you to look at online reviews when choosing a 1 1 5 3.77 1.240
restaurant? 1
If online reviews were good but a friend told you the restaurant was 1 1 5 3.22 .800
not good, would you still go? 1
6
What percentage of good vs bad review online will convince you to go 1 10 100 71.9 15.323
to a restaurant?-Good Reviews 1 2
6
What percentage of good vs bad review online will convince you to go 1 0 90 28.0 15.323
to a restaurant?-Bad Reviews 1 8
6
How likely would you write an online review if you...-Had Bad Service 1 1 5 2.95 1.264
1
How likely would you write an online review if you...-Had Bad Food 1 1 5 3.09 1.402
1
How likely would you write an online review if you...-Food made you 1 1 5 3.39 1.479
sick 1
How likely would you write an online review if you...-Restaurant was 1 1 5 3.39 1.508
unsanitary 1
6
How likely would you write an online review if you...-You Really liked 1 1 5 3.35 1.410
the Food 1
How likely would you write an online review if you...-Had really Good 1 1 5 3.21 1.417
Service 1
7
How likely are you to eat at the following restaurants?-
Texas Roadhouse-Location
8
How likely would you write an online review if you...-Had
Bad Food
9
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Service
When it comes to service, most
consumers chose friendliness as the
most important quality they look for
in a server. This quality was selected
as the first (out of 6) most important
aspect 43.1% of the time. We can
see from Figure 6. that the data is
skewed right, suggesting that
friendliness, although was not chosen first all the time, it was considered as
one of the top qualities.
Another interesting trend came when participants were asked about the
importance of eye contact. This quality was selected as one of the least
important qualities of a waiter, with 54.3% of the consumers selecting it as
the least important. In contrast to friendliness, shown in Figure 7, the graph
of this data is skewed left.
Figure 6. Figure 7.
It appears as though all consumers male and female agree on what the top
qualities are in a server, except when it comes to how often a waiter checks
the table. The cross tabulation chi-square test results (see Figure 8) shows
there is a significant difference in how male and female consumers ranked
this quality (2=14.16, p = .015 < .05). The graph (see Figure 9) for the
female responses show a bell curve relation between the ratings centered at
3. This suggest that this quality was ranked third more than it was ranked in
10
any other position. However, the graph for the men was more uniform, but
the men ranked it in fifth more frequently. This shows that women value how
often a waiter visits the table more than men.
Figure 8. Figure 9.
Online Reviews
The data implies that the female consumers are more likely to write online
reviews. However, most of this data only shows a marginal difference
between men and women, with the exception being when it comes to good
reviews. Data suggest that women are more likely to write a good review
compared to men.
When asked how likely there were to write a review if they liked the food, the
t-test results show there was a significant difference between men and
women with the means measured on the 5-point Likert scale (p = .003;
Mean_male = 2.71; Mean_female = 3.59). Similarly, when asked how likely
there were to write a review if they had good service, the t-test showed there
was a significant difference between men and women (p = .003; Mean_male
= 2.55; Mean_female = 3.45).
11
marginal difference of how women ranked service versus how men ranked
service. (p = .083; Mean_male=14.35, Mean_female=17.58)
When participants were asked how likely they would go back to the
restaurant if the service was bad, the mean of the responses on the 5-point
Likert scale was 2.65, which is the highest compared to the other question of
the same type. This means that consumers are more likely to return to a
restaurant if they had bad service than if they didnt like the food.
Managerial Implications
This research can help managers improve their restaurant by showing them
key factors their target market enjoys. By enhancing or adding a specific
quality, managers can attract their target market and thus increase their
revenue. We also researched what consumers liked about the service and
what the restaurant must do to get a good review. Specific suggestions were
concluded for our findings.
12
qualities are deemed good then servers can be trained uniformly. This can
apply to currently employed and newly hired servers.
Conclusion
The purpose of this research survey was to identify which factors bring
consumers into a restaurant. We specifically looked at the difference
between the males and females, but our results indicated there is no
significant difference in the opinions of the males vs. females when choosing
a restaurant. But there were still key findings which included: both male and
female consumers rely on word-of-mouth restaurant reviews before dining
out, male consumers value entertainment as part of their experience more
than women, and women are more susceptible to writing a positive review.
From these results, specific managerial implications were suggested to
enhance restaurant potential.
Reflections
Madison: Through this survey project I have learned how to turn my survey
results into data that I can use to make changes to something specific (like a
restaurant) or make something better. It helped me understand how useful
this will be for companies that are consumer based.
Michael: From this project, I was able to understand just how important and
useful gathering data and information about a subject is. Running and
operating a business involves much more than what is seen on the surface.
By using surveys in the form of Qualtrics one is able to ascertain this
information in a much more timely and coherent manner. All the while
figuring out what works and what doesn't work for your business.
Yansy: This survey project has taught me how to use Qualtrics to create a
survey and analyze the results. I have also learned how to interpret the data
13
and make conclusions based on the data. I have also, specifically, learned
from this survey project that women are more likely to leave online reviews,
and I found that interesting.
Esmeralda: From this project, I have learned how to create a survey using
Qualtrics and how to analyze and interpret the data. I also learned not to
make conclusions before interpreting the data. Some of the differences
between male and female turned out opposite as to what I initially thought to
be.
References
No references were used in the completion of this survey. Data was collected
first-hand and conclusions were derived from it.
0 (1)
1-3 (2)
4-5 (3)
6 or more (4)
Condition: 0 Is Selected. Skip To: End of Survey.
What is your gender?
Male (1)
Female (2)
What is your age?
14
under 18 (1)
18 - 24 (2)
25 - 34 (3)
35 - 44 (4)
45 - 54 (5)
55 - 64 (6)
65 - 74 (7)
75 - 84 (8)
85 or older (9)
15
Extremely Somewhat Neither likely Somewhat Extremely
likely (5) likely (4) nor unlikely unlikely (2) unlikely (1)
(3)
You had bad
service (Bad
Service)
You didn't
like the food
(Didn't like
food)
Staff made
you feel
uncomfortabl
e (Staff
made you
feel
uncomfortabl
e)
You found
something in
your food
(hair, plastic,
etc...) (You
found
something in
your food)
The
restaurant
looked dirty
or you got
sick
(Restaurant
looked dirty)
16
Rank the service qualities from most important to least important
True (1)
False (2)
If online reviews were good but a friend told you the restaurant was not good, would
you still go?
17
How likely would you write an online review if you...
18