Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER 6
6.1 INTRODUCTION
The relation between the discharge and the upstream water level de-
pends primarily on the shape and dimensions of the structure, and only
slightly on the geometry of the upstream channel or pipe. The relation
can be set up from a theoretical approach which is to be supported by
a calibration, mostly carried out by a hydraulic model study.
During the past centuries numerous types of flow measurement struc-
tures have been designed whose characteristics meet modern demands
of water resources development, particularly in irrigation schemes and
hydrological studies.
b
h
b 11 b
2 5 3 4
c
f
6
1 land slope tertiary unit
f
10
8 9 d
7
e 12
4 g
Figure 6.3. Layout of an The following water courses and structures are identified (in brackets the
irrigation scheme. synonymous names are given):
Water courses
a. Source of supply: river or reservoir
b. Main canal (primary canal)
feeder canals
c. Secondary canals (laterals)
d. Tertiary canals (sublateral, delivery canals)
e. Farm ditches
f. Secondary drain
g. Main drain
Structures
1. Diversion dam with spillway
2. Headwork (head regulator and intake work)
3. Cross regulator (control structure)
4. Tail structure (escape)
5. Secondary offtake (offtake structure)
6. Division structure
7. Check structure
8. Farm outlet (turnout, offtake). Individual delivery block
9. Tertiary offtake (tertiary inlet). Group of farmers intakes
10. Small farm intakes
11. Culvert (inverted syphon)
12. Drop structure (chute structure)
The headworks (head regulator) serves to regulate the flow into the
irrigation main canal. On small installations a simple slide gate may be
sufficient.
For large canals flow can be controlled by one of the following struc-
tures:
stop logs
adjustable undershot gates
adjustable overflow weirs
To avoid sedimentation in the irrigation system, a sand trap can be
designed in the upper part of the main canal.
gate or stoplogs
fixed weir
gate or
stoplogs Gated horse shoe weir Gated weir
Figure 6.4. Cross regula- Different types of structures can be applied as cross regulator or
tors consisting of a fixed check:
weir and an adjustable
section.
overflow structures with a fixed crest
overflow structures with an adjustable crest (need of skilled person-
nel)
overflow structures with shuttergates (stepwise regulation)
overflow with stoplogs (stepwise, but difficult to operate)
adjustable undershot gates (need frequent adjustment)
automatic adjustable gates (a more or less constant upstream or
downstream water level is maintained by float control)
Generally overflow structures are designed in the case of moderate flow
variations while undershot gates are applied for large flow variations. In
many situations a combination of a horse shoe weir and an adjustable
structure gives a rather flexible solution:
the horse shoe controls short term fluctuations
the adjustable part -stoplogs or gates- regulates different flow de-
mands.
y
P side
weir
b
Figure 6.5. Side weir (after:
Bos, 1989). Cross section
control structure
(cross regulator)
offtake
structure
Offtake structures
Hobrad weir Purpose: control of flow into secondary and tertiary canals.
Essentially secondary offtakes do not differ from tertiary offtakes.
The dimensions depend on the maximum discharge. For tertiary
offtakes the discharge ranges from Q = 20 /s to Q = 150 /s. For sec-
ondary offtakes the design discharge is an multiple of this.
Various types of structures are applied as offtake:
flumes ensure a proportional distribution. Discharges depend on the
Butcher weir water level in the feeder canal, and are not adjustable. Flumes are
Figure 6.7. Adjust- suitable in canals carrying a high amount of silt.
able overflow struc- Examples of adjustable overflow structures are:
tures (after: Bos,
1989).
Romijn weir (Indonesia)
Round nose horizontal broad crested weir (Hobrad weir)
This structure is an improvement of the Romijn weir. Mechanically
the structures operate in the same way.
Butchers weir (Sudan)
Shutter gates (stepwise adjustable)
Stoplogs (stepwise adjustable)
Examples of undershot gates which need small head losses are:
Neyrpic modules with one or more openings of different width. The
Radial gate
structure gives a nearly constant discharge, independent of the up-
stream water level. Discharges are stepwise adjustable by closing one
or more openings.
adjustable orifices with concrete blocks (India, Pakistan)
Crump-de Gruyter adjustable streamlined gate (Indonesia)
radial or tainter gates
Constant head orifice
Constant Head Orifices (USA), which are hard to operate
Figure 6.8. Ad-
justable orifices
Examples of pipe flow are:
(after: Bos, Metergate USA (adjustable)
1989). pipe outlets (not adjustable)
5
8
3
8
Q Dividers
Q
A B
1. Division structures:
proportional divisors as overflow structure with a fixed crest. The
division ratio is constant:
adjustable divisors using shutter gates, sliding gates or automatic
gates. The division ratio may be varied.
2. Division boxes are applied where small channels (offtakes) are
branching off from larger ones.
In many cases water distribution especially for the tertiary units takes
place by the use of division boxes, which are alternative solutions
for the combination of two or more tertiary offtakes and a check
structure (Figure 6.10).
Flow distribution in boxes can be realized in different ways:
proportional division by flumes or fixed weirs
adjustable division by undershot gates
adjustable division by stoplogs or adjustable overflow structures
Figure 6.10. Tertiary boxes. Example of a tertiary or quarternary box Example of a tertiary or quarternary box
Drop structures
The main purpose is to avoid canal erosion in steep sloping canals. Es-
pecially natural drains need to be protected against a continuous degra-
dation of their bed.
Two different types are feasible:
1. straight drop structures. They consist of a weir with vertical back
face and stilling basin to dissipate the energy.
Examples are:
weir sill
several short crested weirs with fixed crest and flap gates.
Hydrometry
overflow a1 works Q = QFS check Q < Q < QFS emergency offtakes offtakes farm structures structures
underflow a2 structures check structures structures intakes
modular b1
submerged b2
Adjustable overflow weirs a1 b1 x x
Stoplogs a1 b1 x x x
Adjustable undershot gates a2 b2 x x x x x
Overflow weirs with fixed crest a1 b1 x x x
Horse shoe/duck bill/Giraudet a1 b1 x x x
Flash board checks a1 b1 x
Combination horse shoe + gate a1,2 x
b1,2
Shutter gates a1 b1 x x x
Automatic gates a1,2 b1 x x
Syphon spillways a2 b1 x
Side weirs a1 b1 x
Romijn and Butcher weir a1 b1 x x
Constant Head Orifice a2 b2 x x
Crump-de Gruyter adj. orifice a2 b1 x x x
Crump overflow weir a1 b1 x x
Parshall flume a1 b1 x x
Metergates a2 b2 x x x
Sharp-crested weirs a1 b1 x x x
Flumes in proportional divisors a1 b1 x x x
Neyrpic Modules a2 b1 x x
Pipe outlets a2 b1,2 x x
Syphons and small pipes a2 b1,2 x x
Adjustable divisors a1 b1 x
A C Top of sidewalls
B
B
A C
Plan view Section A-A Section B-B Section C-C
Figure 6.13. Inclined Essentially spillways in reservoir dams are chutes with very high
drop structure. drop heights.
level level
control control
offtake offtake
Figure 6.14. Downstream and
upstream control using cross
regulators. downstream control upstream control
flow. A possible penalty for using upstream control for a whole irriga-
tion system is that irrigated lands in the most remote part of the system
may frequently not receive any water then the farmers will abandon
those lands. A combination which has often been used is to have an
upstream control system for the main and branch canals, and a down-
stream control system for the other, smaller canals.
v12 /2g H
vc2 /2g
v 22 /2g
H1 h1
Q Hc
y1 yc H2
h2
y2
p1
section
control
p2
La Lb L Ld Le
converging
tail water
channel
length
a b
upper slide two frame grooves
flow supporting plate
guide wall
L+r
L
movable weir
or > 0,15m
>0,5 H1max
r
c
seal supporting plate
p
bottom gate supporting plate
seal
Figure 6.16. Hobrad weir passing the weir, and the streamlines above the crest are strongly
(horizontal, broad- curved. In the air-filled area below the underside of the outflowing jet
crested, adjustable) (after:
ISO).
atmospheric pressure should prevail. Among the most used thin-plate
weirs are:
the horizontal sharp-crested weir (Rehbock, Figure 6.17)
the rectangular sharp-crested weir (with side contraction)
the V-shaped sharp-crested weir (Thomson)
the trapezoidal sharp-crested weir (Cipoletti)
the circular sharp-crested weir
the proportional weir (Sutro weir).
1 to 2mm
2
v1 /2g
energy level
upstream face
of weir plate
h1
h2
p1
H1
Q
1:5
1:2
r
1
WES-standard spillways
cylindrical crested weir (Figure 6.19)
the streamlined triangular profile weirs
Figure 6.19. Cylindrical flap gates
crested weir. the Rossum weir
6.4.5 Flumes
Critical depth flumes and broad-crested weirs have some resemblance.
Flumes are less restricted in crest height and the downstream section is
gradually divergent to regain energy. Distinction is made between long-
throated flumes and short-throated flumes. Long-throated flumes are
similar to broad-crested weirs (parallel streamlines). Short-throated
flumes behave like short-crested weirs (curved streamlines).
bc
h1 1
yc h2
m
p1
A A
plan
B trapezoidal flume
6.4.6 Gates
Each opening in a plate or a wall, the top of which is placed at a suffi-
cient distance below the upstream water level, is a gate or an orifice.
Water flows through the opening, which is called gate flow, orifice-
flow, underflow or undershot flow. Flow may either be free or sub-
merged. Distinction is made between sharp-edged orifices in thin plates
and a variety of gates:
sharp-edged orifices (rectangular, circular and other shapes)
constant-head orifice
radial gate (tainter gate, Figure 6.23)
Crump-de Gruyter adjustable gate
vertical gates (sluice gate, section 6.7, Figure 6.29)
Neyrpic modules
various valves
culverts (measurement of peak flows).
the Romijn gate
syphons
y1
a
y2
w y=w
y1
a
w y
p1 p2
vertical
Figure 6.23. Flow below a
L
radial or tainter gate (after:
Bos, 1989). gate with raised sill
X = main function
0 = additional function
The reader may observe that the majority of the irrigation structures
have the combined function of flow regulation and flow measurement.
(See also Section 6.3)
Where water flows through circular canals with a free water level (no
pressure conduits) several types of flumes may be applied such as
Venturis and Palmer Bowlus flumes.
The same structures are used to measure waste water discharge in
industrial plants.
interception
vegetation
surface retention
surface runoff
evapotranspiration
pumping station unsaturated zone
precipitation brook phreatic table
percolation
irrigation river phreatic aquifer
phreatic groundwater flow
All different types of weirs, flumes and gates are applied in hydrological
networks. Sometimes compound weirs are designed. These structures
normally consist of a number of overflow structures with different crest-
levels and separated by piers.
The reason for the high accuracy of sharp-crested weirs is the well de-
fined flow pattern and the thorough calibration in several hydraulic labo-
ratories.
2 to 3 H1 max
2
v1 /2g
H1 h1
v1 h2 H2
r 1
p 1 v2
p2
Figure 6.27. Definition sketch
of weir flow (after: Bos,
1989).
where
Q = discharge (m3/s)
g = acceleration of gravity g = 9.81 m/s2
b = width of the weir (m)
CD = characteristic discharge coefficient ()
CV = coefficient for the approach velocity ()
h1 = upstream head over the weir (m)
The general equation reads Q = C h1u where u varies from 0.5 to 2.5
depending on the type and shape of the structure.
The relevant equations for flow measurement structures are given in
handbooks, International Standards and other references.
Section 6.7 gives these equations for a restricted number of well-
known cross sections.
rectangular Q= (6.2)
V-shaped Q= (6.3)
trapezoidal Q= (6.4)
Rectangular 1.5
Parabolic (circular) 2.0
V-shaped 2.5
V-shaped more than full 1.5 < u < 2.5
coefficient of
approach velocity C v
1.20
triangular control u=2.5
parabolic control u=2.0
rectangular control u=1.5
1.15
1.10
1.05
y = h1; A1 equals the wetted area at the head measurement station and
CD is the discharge coefficient.
Gates
Flow through gates is also called underflow and in some cases sluice
gate flow (Figure 6.29).
free flow
Q = C1 b a (6.7)
rectangular Q= (6.8)
h1 h1
h2
a h2 a
Figure 6.29. Flow under a
sluice gate. a. free flow b. submerged flow
where
a = gate opening (m)
C1 = characteristic discharge coefficient for free flow ()
C1 is a function of the parameter h1/a and the bottom shape of
the gate
submerged flow
Q = C2 b a (6.10)
where
h2 = downstream head
C2 = coefficient for submerged flow
C2 depends on the parameter h2/h1 and the bottom shape of the
gate
6.8.1 Characteristics
The characteristics of the numerous different structures are expressed in
a number of properties:
loss of head required by the measuring device
Structures with a high discharge capacity are characterized by a high
discharge coefficient. For example, the short-crested weir with cylin-
drical crest CD = 1.48 needs considerably less head than the broad-
crested rectangular profile weir CD = 0.85. On the other hand, the
necessary loss of head is decreasing with a higher modular limit,
consecutively for sharp-crested weirs (a low value) and flumes (a
high value).
measuring range
The shape and the width of the crest both determine the minimum
discharge, assuming a minimum head h1 = 0.05 m. The measuring
range is defined as = Qmax/Qmin.
Structures with a triangular cross-section allow larger ranges than
structures with a rectangular cross-section.
ability to transport solid materials
The passage of sediment across the bottom of the approach channel
will be facilitated by a low crest height and a streamlined inflow
(flumes). Gates and overflow structures with low sills (or even with-
out a sill) are the most favourable structures with respect to sediment
transport capability. Transport of floating materials needs a stream-
lined structure, including the crest shape: sharp-crested devices will
for this reason not be selected as discharge measuring structures in
water in which there is floating debris.
sensitivity
The overall error in flow measurements with structures depends
strongly on the sensitivity S, which is expressed as the variation of
the discharge caused by a relative change in the upstream water level.
S = u h/h1 (6.11)
where
h/h1 = is the relative change in upstream water level
u = the power in the equation Q = C h1u
Gates are by far least sensible to water level changes, whereas over-
flow structures are three to five times more sensitive.
accuracy
The accuracy of the structure depends on the number and the reliabil-
ity of the calibrations and whether the measurements can be repro-
duced within a limited percentage. Sharp-crested weirs are famous for
their high accuracy.
off-take canal
Qo
F= (6.12)
With the general rating for a structure Q = C h1u, the flexibility can
be rewritten as:
F = uo hs / us ho (6.13)
where:
uo = u-power of the structure in the off-take canal
us = u-power of the structure in the continuing supply canal
ho = upstream head over the structure in the off-take canal
hs = upstream head over the structure in the continuing supply canal
There are three possibilities with respect to the flexibility of the bi-
furcated offtake (assume free flow at both structures):
1. F = 1
This holds when both structures are of the same type uo = us and
when they have the same crest level or sill level. Distribution is
proportional and not depending on upstream changes.
2. F < 1
This happens for instance when the offtake structure is an under-
shot gate, uo = 0.5 and the continuing canal has a horizontal over-
flow structure, us = 1.5.
F = 0.5 hs / 1.5 ho
provided hs < 3ho, then F < 1.
With this design the variation in the offtake is less than in the
continuing canal, which is an advantage for tail-end users of irri-
gation water in the offtake canal.
3. F > 1
Now assume the offtake structure is a horizontal overflow struc-
ture, uo = 1.5 and the continuing canal has an undershot gate
us = 0.5.
F = 1.5 hs / 0.5 ho
provided ho < 3hs, then F > 1.
This may occur when the offtake structure acts as a spillway, to
prevent the supply canal from overload.
accuracy
Field structures will measure discharges generally with an error XQ
5%. The accuracy in the evaluation of discharges is dealt with in
Section 6.11.
non-technical demands such as:
the availability of construction materials
familiarity with a certain type of structure
importance of standardization.
It is generally recommended that the number of different types of
structures in an area be restricted. When new types are introduced,
technicians and farmers need to be familiarized. Standardization
leads also to a reduction in costs.
at many places structures are exposed to alterations by unautho-
rized people. Such alterations can be avoided by building the
structures sturdily and by locking movable parts.
The most suitable structure can only be selected after performing an in-
depth study into the integration of all field-boundary conditions and
human requirements.
Human requirements
no need to regulate flow or water levels fixed crest
desired measuring range 1 m3/s < Q < 15 m3/s
desired accuracy: XQ 7,5% for the complete range
non technical demands: a standardized structure
discharge equation Q =
with CD = f(H1/L)
Stilling well
>Hmax
2 to 3 Ho Alternative geometries
Flow Hmax riz of downstream face of weir
on
tal
cre
st
h
p b
L > 1.75H max
range of discharge:
= 8 for broad-crested flow
= Qmax/Qmin
= 45 including short-crested flow
required fall:
S1 = 67% for H1/L 0.40
the modular limit
S1 < 67% for H1/L > 0.40 (Table 6.7)
application:
weirs with fixed crest: in natural streams
adjustable weirs: in irrigation canals as offtake structure
supporting plate
supporting plate bottom gate
guide wall
a) with fixed crest b) movable with one vertical slot c) movable with two slots
Figure 6.33. Three meth- Traditionally the round nose horizontal broad-crested weirs have been
ods of using the weir. designed and constructed as concrete weirs with a fixed crest.
Nowadays, many engineers select the weir as a measurement and
regulating structure, made of steel or aluminium and movable in vertical
slots. Such a structure is very versatile for use in relatively flat areas
where the water demand and the water level may vary during the sea-
son.
Figure 6.33 shows three methods of application.
upper slide
L+r
L
movable weir
bottom gate
upper slide
1.10
1.05
C
D
1.00
recommended value for broad-crested
and short-crested flow
0.1 < H1/ L < 1.2
0.95
0.90
In the referred study (Boiten, 1987) the head range has been extended
to h1/L = 1.20 so including short-crested flow.
For weirs made of stainless steel, aluminium or painted metal the rough-
ness of the crest will not affect the discharge coefficient.
Figure 6.35 gives CD as a function of H1/L.
Limits of application:
Table 6.7. Modular limit as a function of H1/L for weirs with a vertical backface.
H1/L Modular limit Sl
0.33 67%
0.40 60%
0.50 50%
0.57 < 40%
h1 = 0.98 m
h 2 = 0.39 m
r
r Y = 2.02m
L p
Figure 6.36. Determination
apex height P.
Q=
Q=
A = (h1 + 1.63) {10.00 + 2(h1 + 1.63)}
The relation between the upstream head h1 and the discharge Q for this
weir can easily be presented by:
Q=
Q = 1 m3/s h1 = 0.165 m
Q = 15 m3/s h1 = 0.991 m
3.00
Y1 vs Q required
head loss
Y2 max vs Q
2.00
water depth Y (m)
actual Y2 vs Q
head loss
1.00
0
Figure 6.37. Relationship y vs 0 5 10 15
3
Q. flow rate Q (m /s)
The required head loss to prevent submerged flow has been calcu-
lated in Table 6.11.
Sl values have been interpolated from Table 6.7
h2 max = h1 Sl
y2 max = h2 max + p
y1 = h 1 + p
y2 values have been interpolated from Table 6.8
y1 y2 max is the required head loss
1. Model scales n
3. Scaling effects
where
Fr = Froude number ()
v = velocity (m/s)
g = gravitational acceleration (m/s)
R = hydraulic radius R = A/b (m)
A = cross-sectional area ()
b = width (m)
Re = (6.18)
where
Re = Reynolds number ()
v = velocity above the crest (m/s)
L = crest length (m)
= kinematic viscosity (m2/s)
To prevent scaling effects in the above example two models are
needed:
n = 1 0.05 m < h1 < 0.30 m model 0.05 < hmod < 0.30 m
n = 5 0.25 m < h1 < 1.50 m model 0.05 < hmod < 0.30 m
In recent years, local and national water authorities are attempting to re-
establish fish migration in their rivers.
The main purpose of all these fishways is fish passage. Nevertheless, for
all of them head-discharge relations can be determined.
The availability of a rating curve for the fishway is important in
those situations where a fishway has been constructed in a bypass paral-
lel to a flow-measurement structure in the main course, because most of
the discharge during dry periods may pass through the fishway.
In some cases a rating curve of a fishway can be derived from its
design rules. The best accuracy will be achieved by a calibration of the
fishway using a scale model.
XQ = (6.19)
gates u = 0.5
sutro weir u = 1.0
rectangular cross section u = 1.5
parabolic cross section u = 2.0
V-shaped cross-section u = 2.5
XQ error in discharge (%)
XC error in CD, generally 2% < XC < 5%
XB error in width, can be corrected (%)
Xh error in head measurement Xh = 100(h/h1) (%) (6.20)
h absolute error in head measurement, normally 0.002 m < h <
0.005 m.
End depth methods Rectangular channels with a free overfall ISO 3847-1977
Non-rectangular channels with a free overfall ISO 4371-1984
All types Guide-lines for the selection of flow gauging structures ISO 8368-1985
Compound gauging structures ISO 14139-2000