Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Emily Rosa
Mrs. Gardner
English 10H/Period 4
9 May 2017
Have you ever considered the life long changes wild animals experience when they are
placed in captive environments in zoos across the world? Zoos worldwide capture wild animals
in hopes of educating the public, and force animals to perform tricks for entertainment. The issue
with zoos is that they have the ability of doing two things; they can distort our perspective of
what is right and wrong with animal treatment, or they can possibly change our perspective of
endangered species, educating those who are interested in wild animals around the globe. There
are little to no laws active today protecting the rights of animals and determining the difference
between abuse and entertainment. A few basic laws are from the Endangered Species Act,
(ESA), Animal Welfare Act, (AWA) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act, (MMPA), which
state the right to capture animals for entertainment purposes as well as the regulation of housing,
licensing, and transporting wild animals for zoos (Captive Animals and The Law). None of the
laws address living conditions or the trauma animals are put through while living in zoos. While
they can have educational and entertainment purposes, zoos have abusive effects on animals
because they use them for public amusement, rid them of survival skills, and place them in
substandard conditions.
Rosa 2
Initially, many would perceive zoos as an opportunity to serve for educational purposes.
For instance, blogger James Borrell in 8 Reasons Zoos are Critically Important reasoned,
Zoos are a living museum. What we learn about wild animals in captivity can help us manage
and conserve them in the wild. From animal behaviour, to reproductive rates to dietary
requirements. Also, in The Moral Case for Captive Animals reporter Robin Ganzert for
Deseret News writes, 61 percent of zoo- and aquarium-goers could discuss what they learned
from the experience, and 35 percent said the visit reinforced their belief in the importance of
animals and wildlife conservation. In addition, Toronto Zoos curator of animals Marie Frank
Chris Selley). Ultimately, many people believe that zoos have strong educational benefits as well
as the ability to make conservation awareness for wild animals. Yes, zoos have the power of
educating the public and all ages. However, zoos should reevaluate the way they treat wildlife
because they distort the difference between amusement and instinctive wild behavior.
Undoubtedly, zoos have the ability to entertain an audience and leave the visitors with a
better understanding of how certain animals thrive. However, when one considers the inhumane
treatment that the animals receive, amusement should not be associated with the behavior
towards wild species. For example, stated in 10 Things You Didnt Know About Seaworld,
orcas that perform at Seaworld have little to no shade in their enclosed tanks, resulting in
sunburns that are later concealed with black zinc oxide. Also, Jaimi Dolmage, blogger for One
Green Planet, narrates, Tigers food and water are withheld unless the tiger performs the task
the trainer wants it to, basically forcing the tiger who would otherwise be hunting its own food in
Rosa 3
the wild, to beg. To add to the dangers of animal entertainment, The growing popularity of
dolphin encounters, beluga interactions, and killer whales performing aerial acrobatics, observes
writer Shari Plummer from National Geographic, has fueled the market for trade in these wild
species. Based on these reports, animal performances result in mainly neglect towards the wild
animals along with little to no educational value to the public. In summary, if animal treatment
does not improve, why should zoos be able to train wild animals for public entertainment and
profit?
Furthermore, zoos continue to rid wild animals of their survival skills that they would
normally use in their natural habitat. By doing this, wild animals are not able to be released back
into the wild because their natural instincts have been stripped away. Animals in captivity would
not be able to live normally again after being hand fed by humans and in unnatural
environments. The article Pitiful Prisons from PETA describes, Animals are often prevented
from doing most of the things that are natural and important to them, like running, roaming,
flying, climbing, foraging, choosing a partner, and being with others of their own kind. In
addition, Aly Baker, Professor from Missouri University remarks, Although I am sure some
zoos and aquariums treat animals well, the animals do not experience life the same way they
would had they lived in their natural habitat, she continues, This poses an issue because if
these captive animals are ever released, they must relearn skills they lost in order to survive in
the wild again. Obviously, holding wild animals captive results in the animals no longer being
wild but more domesticated. Why should animals be rid of their natural instincts? Is it worth it
Essentially, wild animals should not be forced to live in an unknown, unsafe, and
unethical living environment. Similarly, animals are often forced in a smaller, uncomfortable
area that replicates their once known habitat. Furthermore, animals in captivity acquire a
mental disorder called Zoochosis. Blogger Jessica Ramos in Pitiful Prisons writes, For the
most part, animals live in the present. If their present is a small caged enclosure, then that is a
stressful existence from which they cannot escape. Relating to how the environments are
unsafe, reporter for the Virginian Pilot, Debbie Messina, proclaims the traumatizing results of
zoo captivity:
At the Virginia Zoo, 10 prairie dogs died when their tunnel collapsed, a rhinoceros
drowned in the moat of her exhibit, and a zebra narrowly escaped death after jumping
into the lion exhibit, while another lost her life when she bolted from a holding pen,
Capturing wild animals and placing them in a new home with new surroundings, new routines,
and new expectations can ultimately destroy their natural life. From research, it can be
understood that a wild animal is completely uneasy and frantic when placed in an unfamiliar
environment. Therefore, wildlife should be left to thrive in the wild where they belong; all living
things deserve to live without unnatural expectations, without neglect, and without being taken
advantage of.
Although zoos are often a place to learn about wildlife that humans do not normally have
the chance to see, they have the unfortunate ability to neglect animals in various ways without
considering their actions. Zoos have the power to distort morals regarding animal treatment.
Rosa 5
Being forced into a new life can have a dramatic effect on a creature: imagine what it could do to
Works Cited
Baker, Aly. "Animals are Not Meant for our Entertainment." University Wire, 17 Jan,
Borrell, James. 8 Reasons that Zoos are Critically Important for Conservation 2014.
https://jamesborrell.com.
http://aldf.org/resources/advocating-for-animals/captive-animals-and-the-law/
Dolmage, Jaimi. Exposed! Six Flags Discovery Kingdom Theme Park: Cruelty Isnt
Ganzert, Robin. "The Moral Case for Captive Animals." Deseret News, 03
Plummer, Shari. Free Ride: The Case Against Whale and Dolphin Shows National
http://www.care2.com/causes/zoochosis-the-disturbing-thing-that-happens-to-animals-in-
captivity.html
Selley, Chris. "Honey, I Shrunk the Zoo." National Post, 14 Jan, 2017, pp.
www.peta.org/issues/animals-in-entertainment/animals-used-entertainment-factsheets/zo
os-pitiful-prisons/
10 Things You Didnt Know About Seaworld Sea World of Hurt, 2017.
http://www.seaworldofhurt.com.