Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
by
Marc J. Summa
This applied dissertation is submitted by Marc J. Summa under the direction of the
persons listed below. It is submitted to the Fischler School of Education and Human
Services and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
_______________________________________ ____________________
_______________________________________ ____________________
_______________________________________ ____________________
ii
Acknowledgments
Looking back on the journey I have taken in this doctoral process, there are so
I would like to especially thank my wife, Amanda. You are my heart and my
soul. You fuel my passion to always work hard and are the inspiration behind my love
for life. To my parents, Daniel and Frances, who have given me not only the gift of life,
but instilled in me the determination necessary to achieve my goals. You never accepted
anything but my very best, set the highest of expectations and truly believed in me.
I have always felt that the only way to succeed in life is to surround oneself with
the greatest of friends, colleagues and environment possible to become worldly in ones
doctoral journey thank you Six Appeal. My professors had the highest respect for my
openness, creativity and opinions, and provided me with the most thought-provoking
insight into the educational profession. Of course none of this could have happened
without the guidance of my advisor, Phyllis Tucker-Wicks, EdD. Your wisdom and drive
Finally, I want to thank my children, Madelyn and Daniel, for whom this
doctorate is dedicated because you are the reason I pushed myself to the limit, spent
weekends away from home, and worked intensely on my assignments. I hope that
someday, when you read this dissertation, you feel pride in knowing that your father
became a doctor for the betterment of the education profession and to make a difference
iii
Abstract
An Evaluation of the Preparing New Educators (PNE) Program. Summa, Marc 2007:
Applied Dissertation. Nova Southeastern University, Fischler School of Education and
Human Services. Beginning Teachers/Mentoring/High School Teachers
This applied dissertation was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Preparing New
Educators (PNE) program at the researchers worksite and to provide recommendations
for an induction program designed for new members of the teaching profession. This
study evaluated the researchers school districts PNE program and its effectiveness for
new teachers at the researchers worksite. This study also provided insight into the
programs available within the researchers school district that can assist in the induction
of new teachers as well as the progression of new teachers throughout the first years of
the profession.
The PNE program was a collegial-coaching and induction program designed to help
educators new to the researchers school district. The primary purpose of the program
was to ensure that teachers had the opportunity and support necessary to develop into
highly effective educators. The problem was that the PNE program was designed to assist
new teachers with preparing lessons and acclimating to the classroom environment, but
the program was not achieving its goals. The program also was intended to provide each
new teacher with an experienced teacher for support with guidance, procedural
information, and teaching skills. The criteria and benchmarks used in this program came
from the heavily researched Florida Performance Measurement System (FPMS) and the
Florida Department of Educations Accomplished Practices for Educators of the Twenty-
First Century. The program was flexible so that the varying developmental needs of new
educators would be accommodated. All educators new to the district entered into the PNE
program.
Teachers in the PNE program had to successfully complete six observations; each
observation was measured by a performance instrument. These performance instruments
consisted of six domains, considered by the researchers school district to be a
measurement of a qualified, professional educator. Additionally, each new teacher was
assigned a PNE team, consisting of an administrator and two certified faculty members.
These team members were resources for new teachers throughout their participation in
the PNE program.
This project evaluation enabled the researcher to provide guidelines for a more effective
PNE program for the researchers worksite. It was the intent of this evaluation to increase
the effectiveness of the PNE program, using resources already available at the
researchers school district.
iv
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2
Organizational Setting .................................................................................................... 2
Statement of the Problem ............................................................................................... 2
Purpose of the Study ...................................................................................................... 3
Background and Significance of the Problem ................................................................ 4
Research Questions ........................................................................................................ 4
Definition of Terms ........................................................................................................ 7
Chapter 2: Review of the Related Literature ..................................................................... 10
Literature Review Summary ........................................................................................ 10
Chapter 3: Methodology.................................................................................................... 17
Research Design ........................................................................................................... 17
Participants ................................................................................................................... 17
Instruments ................................................................................................................... 18
Procedures .................................................................................................................... 18
Treatment Program ....................................................................................................... 19
Chapter 4: Results ............................................................................................................. 21
Introduction .................................................................................................................. 21
Analysisof Data ............................................................................................................ 25
Chapter 5: Discussion........................................................................................................ 27
Introduction to Dissertation .......................................................................................... 27
Implications of Findings............................................................................................... 28
Limitations ................................................................................................................... 30
Outcomes ...................................................................................................................... 31
Summary ...................................................................................................................... 32
Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 32
References ......................................................................................................................... 33
Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 36
A Program Theory Diagram ..................................................................................... 37
B Data Collection Instrument ................................................................................... 39
C Teambuilding Workshop Agenda (Sample) ......................................................... 43
D Teambuilding Evaluation Form (Sample) ............................................................ 45
E Collegial Buzz Group Topics ............................................................................... 49
F LEADSPNE Survey .............................................................................................. 53
G LEADSPNE Administrators Guide .................................................................... 66
H LEADSPNE Scoring Key .................................................................................... 70
I LEADSPNE Calculation Worksheet ..................................................................... 83
J LEADSPNE Feedback Summary Sheet ................................................................ 93
K References: LEADSPNE Reading List ................................................................ 95
Tables ................................................................................................................................ 98
1 Teacher Number and Percentage of the Rate of Participation in the LEADSPNE
Survey Process .............................................................................................................. 99
2 Participants Responses to the Individual Professional Development Plan Survey
..................................................................................................................................... 101
3 Participants Responses to New Teacher Induction Program Teambuilding
Workshop .................................................................................................................... 103
v
4 Results of the LEADSPNE Survey Using the LEADSPNE Feedback Summary
Worksheet.................................................................................................................... 105
vi
2
Chapter 1: Introduction
Organizational Setting
As the ninth largest school district in the nation, the researchers school district
prided itself on the belief that it would provide the best education in the nation. The
expanding learning community in the southeast section of the school district. Most of the
science, social studies, English, and foreign languages offered at the school. According to
researchers worksite was one of only three A graded high schools in the school
district.
additional teachers, many of whom were new to the teaching profession or lacked the
requisite formal teacher education. The increased student population and influx of
The researchers role at the worksite was as a social studies teacher and an
The problem existing in the researchers school district was that the induction
process for new teachers had not been successful, despite district administrators
3
7 out of 12 new teachers (58.4%) did not complete the PNE program. There was only a
slight improvement during the 2004-2005 school year, when 14 out of 25 (56%) of the
program until they completed all PNE components and domains. Administrators at the
researchers worksite expected PNE participants to complete the program within two
Participants in this study included new teachers at the researchers worksite for
the following school years: (1) 2004-2005, (2) 2005-2006, and (3) 2006-2007.
Participants in this study were asked to complete surveys that allowed them to reflect on
their experiences and make recommendations for the PNE program. The researcher
tabulated, analyzed, and used the statistical data from several instruments (see
The data collected over the three school years showed that 80% of new teachers
completing the survey felt they were not adequately supported, and 75% felt that they
needed more assistance in planning. Also, 35% of the surveyed new teachers felt that
morale was low amongst new teachers at the researchers worksite. Given these data, the
researcher identified a strong need to evaluate the effectiveness of the PNE program at
the worksite.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the PNE program.
For over 10 years the PNE program had been used in the researchers school district, but
4
no formal program evaluation had been conducted. The domains which new educators
had to pass included the following: (1) presentation of subject matter; (2) management
(verbal and nonverbal); (5) instructional planning; and (6) testing (student preparation,
administration, and feedback). Each domain had specific subcategories that were
The primary purpose of the PNE program was to ensure that new teachers had the
opportunity and support necessary to develop into highly effective educators. PNE was
designed to assist new teachers in preparing lessons and acclimating to the classroom
environment. The program was also intended to provide each new teacher with an
experienced teacher to support the novice with guidance, procedural information, and
program.
The criteria and benchmarks in the program came from the state governments
heavily researched Florida Performance Measurement System (FPMS) and the guidance
of the Twenty-First Century. The PNE program was intended to be flexible so that
Instrument. All PNE participants were assigned to a support team and, more important,
an experienced teacher early in the year. The mentors role was to coach, support,
encourage, and guide the new teacher through a successful experience during the new
5
teachers first year or for the length of the new teachers participation in the PNE
program.
Research had shown that peer teachers acting as mentors had an impact on new
teachers in ways that were superior to training alone. The real-life classroom presented
questions that only real-life experiences could answer. Mentors helped provide those
answers by (1) giving practical, concrete advice; (2) posing important questions to
prompt reflection; (3) modeling teaching techniques in the classroom; (4) observing and
with their day-to-day responsibilities (Moir, 2003). The amount of time that each PNE
teaching proficiency. At the end of the school year, trained auditors visited each of the
Research Questions
The following research questions formed the structure of this research study:
that will lead to a change in the way the researchers worksite and the district
3. What are the major concerns of teachers and staff regarding the PNE
program?
5. How should the PNE program be customized to better meet the needs of each
Definition of Terms
504 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is a federal statute requiring that
students with disabilities have access to public education programs. Students who are
eligible include those served in Special Education programs under the Individuals With
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and those with other disabilities substantially limiting
education services and programs for disabled or gifted students. All students may need
assistance with instruction and assessment from time to time. Accommodations are
simply adjustments in the way students are taught or the way they are expected to
more deliberate. Students with disabilities require accommodations that will help those
students to work around the limitations resulting from the disabilities. Without the
accommodations, students with disabilities may not be able to learn important concepts
and skills (Accommodations and Modifications for Students With Disabilities Project,
2004).
Learners (ELLs) in grades K-12. Title III, a federally funded program, provides eligible
Local Education Agencies (LEAs) sub grants to provide supplemental services for ELLs.
Both ESOL and Title III hold students accountable for progress in English language
proficiency and require evidence of attainment to the exit level. The ESOL program is
will use English to communicate and demonstrate academic, social, and cultural
ESOL and general-education classes, accommodate the needs of the linguistically- and
appropriate to use the language spoken in the students homes as a means of facilitating
instruction for English language learners and communication with their parents (Barker,
2005).
concern for educators in the Florida Public School System. The FPMS is also used by
IEP, or the Individual Education Plan, is set by the Admissions, Review, and
Dismissal (ARD) Committee, which sets short- and long-term goals. As with all
educational goals, they must be measurable, observable, and obtainable within the
needs of the new educator, thus providing feedback to the administrators of the PNE
program.
Mentoring occurs anytime someone seeks to learn from someone else who had
experience in the topic for learning. Preservice, novice, or experienced teachers can have
mentors.
9
PD refers to professional development for teachers to help them learn new roles
and teaching strategies that will improve student achievement. Educators have access to
an expanding body of knowledge about their content area, teaching techniques, and
with the current focus on educational standards that emphasize in-depth learning
PNE is a program designed to assist new teachers with preparing lessons and
acclimating to the classroom environment. The program was also intended to provide
each new teacher with a mentor to support new teachers with guidance, procedural
information, and technical teaching skills. The primary purpose of the program is to
ensure that teachers have the opportunity and support necessary to develop into highly
effective educators.
10
The PNE program attempted to provide an outline for school districts to use in
order to prepare all new educators to meet the challenges of the teaching profession. A
study conducted by Andrew in 1990 found that graduates of 5-year (teacher) programs
had higher entry and retention rates than graduates of 4-year programs. Graduates of the
5-year program were more likely to enter and stay in teaching and to take on leadership
mentors had keen observational skills, excellent communication skills, and of course,
patience, enthusiasm, and a love of all kinds of learning (Moir 2003). They also mastered
their content area and spent time in preparing for any assessments.
be taken on the education system. New teachers must constantly be recruited in order to
fill in the gaps when teachers leave the system, exacting a financial burden. But far worse
is the educational cost of teacher attrition. Every teacher who leaves after only a few
years takes vital classroom experience. With each departing teacher was a missed
opportunity to establish lasting relationships between teachers and students, teachers and
mentoring programs will be in our schools. Key to ensuring that teachers, principals, and
11
other educators have the knowledge and skills to meet the challenges of todays
who fanned the flames of their students educational passion. Excellent teachers also
credited their mentors who encouraged them to continue in the profession. Excellent
teachers allow their passion to shape them in their profession (Zarra, 2003).
nevertheless find it challenging to translate their education courses into effective teaching
appears that teacher-education students may learn to think differently about the subject
matter they teach as a result of participating in teacher education programs (Floden and
Wilson, 2003).
According to the Vermont Early Childhood Work Group (2001), the quality of
childrens experiences depends largely on the knowledge, experience, and skills of the
people who work with them. Everyone who works with young children and their
knowledge and skills. To provide children with the best, it is important that we strive for
According to Adela Solis, PhD (2004), a severe and persistent national shortage
of teachers has greatly compromised the quality of teaching in todays schools. This
shortage has become especially troublesome at a time when students face an ever-
12
growing demand to master challenging standards. Many students are being taught by
teachers who have not been certified or who are teaching subjects outside their expertise.
As a result, we are seeing the federal government and professional organizations address
The most relevant source for a definition of teacher quality comes from federal
law, which focused on credentials and content expertise. The No Child Left Behind Act
required a highly qualified teacher in every school classroom by the end of 2005. The
Act authorized a number of programs to recruit, certify, and place teachers in high-
2004).
In an attempt to comply with the law and obtain quality versus quantity, how are
potential college students and education majors, reacting to the recruitment effort? What
is being done to entice college-aged students or even professionals in other fields to the
education profession? Additionally, how is the federal government going to ensure that
There is no doubt that high-quality teaching has been influenced by the lack of
teachers and by the presence of teachers who are teaching outside their field. In all
difficult for students to receive sound instruction. An additional threat to quality is the
inability to retain new teachers once they are recruited, trained, and placed in schools.
Solis (2004) found that the increasing numbers of teachers who came into the field
does the federal government propose to integrate a successful recruitment and training
program into the education profession? What alternative resources can be tapped to
13
several alternative certification projects that are funded by the Transition to Teaching
program of the U.S. Department of Education. The mentoring of and support for teacher
candidates of the IDRA projects supplements the new teacher services already provided
by the school district. The districts new teacher support and mentoring program is
coordinated through the professional development department. Its services are geared
toward all first-year teachers, whether they are certified through a traditional certification
Key features of this program include the following: pairing of a novice teacher
with a veteran teacher, having a teacher buddy, creating a new teacher support group,
and building a grade-level or content-area team (Solis, 2004). This support system is
crucial to the success of the new teacher and the development of excellence in quality.
It should be used at all levels, in all school districts, throughout the nation. This IDRA
project serves as a model for educational effectiveness and should be embraced and
Mentors prepare new teachers in ways that no amount of training can. The real-
life classroom presents questions that only real-life experiences can answer. Mentors help
provide those answers by giving practical, concrete advice; posing important questions to
prompt reflection; modeling teaching techniques in the classroom; observing and offering
feedback; and suggesting another point of view at a time when it is easy to lose all
perspective. Moir found (2003) that mentors help novice teachers balance professional
A successful induction and mentoring program can help ensure that after the first
year, a novice teacher has acquired requisite skills, confidence, and motivation. A new
teacher observed:
Understanding the changes and transitions in adults lives enables adult educators to
anticipate learning needs that arise at various life points, understand how life events
facilitate or inhibit learning in a particular situation, prepare adults for life changes,
that are more meaningful (Knowles, Holton & Swanson, 2005). A new teachers
experiences in and out of the classroom, with the assistance of an effective mentor, will
Research reaffirmed that another way in which the PNE program could be an
effective tool for developing excellent teachers was by using reflective practice, which
encouraged teachers to learn from experiences and collaborate more efficiently with
beginning teachers so they are prepared for the complexities of everyday teaching and
decision making. Collaborative reflection can positively affect professional growth and
reaffirmed that by becoming independent and reflective thinkers, beginning teachers were
The role of the mentor during reflective dialogue is not only to provide answers
but to help beginning teachers develop their own answers and pose questions. Mentors
can use many strategies to help beginning teachers organize their thoughts and make
sense of classroom events. Reflection on teaching often starts in the university and ends
The literature repeatedly stated that with encouragement, beginning teachers can
incorporate what they learned in their teacher-preparation programs into the real-world
experiences of their classroom. A beginning teacher can share verbal reflections with a
mentor whose experience and support can help during the first year. By engaging in
reflective practice, beginning teachers can reflect not only on technical aspects but also
Research and practice reaffirmed that supporting new teachers in their first years
of teaching was where the focus should be if we want teaching quality and retention.
Studies showed that well-designed mentoring programs lowered the attrition rates of new
teachers. Experience with mentoring in the classroom demonstrated that this type of new
teacher support can promote quality in the new teachers instruction: New teachers were
Mentoring in teaching was especially important for new teachers during their
the first year of teaching). According to Barry Sweeney (2001), Mentoring during
induction is a complex and developmental process which mentors use to support and
guide their protg through the necessary early career transitions which are part of
16
2004).
After reviewing the literature, the researcher identified that the PNE program
could be improved in order to make the program more effective. The researcher identified
that there was no clear explanation of what the purpose for the PNE program was or how
the program was designed to assist in new teachers professional growth and
following program criteria must be articulated. (1) purpose, (2) benefits, and (3)
drawbacks. Once these criteria are established, identifying how shall we get there
becomes extremely important. Only then can the organization determine whether the
Chapter 3: Methodology
Research Design
the researchers worksite, there are several steps that are taken. First, the formative
teachers (one from each department) and one administrator. The formative committee
met prior to the evaluation process to discuss the plan of how to conduct the evaluation
and to suggest any changes or additions to the timeline. The summative evaluation
committee consisted of the researcher, several teachers not participating in the formative
committee (one from each department), and one administrator. The summative
committee met to discuss which of the measurement tools would be used in the
evaluation of the program. Additionally, the summative committee met at the conclusion
of the evaluation and used the LEADSPNE data collection instruments, as well as a
FPMS form to provide statistical evidence for the researchers final recommendations.
developed and submitted for approval by the administration at the researchers worksite.
Participants
randomization of the treatment group and control group due to the fact that the specific
guidelines of the Preparing New Educators program prohibit any new educators from
being excluded from the program. However, the researchers worksite had a system
already in place of after-school committees that each faculty member are a part of and are
18
an active participant. One such committee is specifically designed for new teachers
called collegial buzz group and this was the foundation for the treatment group. Once
members among the forty new teachers at the researchers worksite and are randomly
selected alphabetically by last name, selecting the first person to be assigned to the
treatment group and the second person to be assigned to the control group, and so on after
to ensure an even numerical distribution. The remaining twenty new teachers formed
Instruments
researcher used mean scores, standard deviation, standard error, t-scores and z-scores to
determine confidence level, validity and reliability of the treatment provided to research
participants in Table 3 of this applied dissertation. Additionally, the statistical data are
collected by using the surveys and evaluations provided in the appendices section of this
dissertation.
Procedures
amount of time, prior to the scheduled pre-planning dates, where the New Educators
Induction program took place. They are introduced to their PNE team members, the
Program Evaluation Committee, and the administrative staff at the researchers worksite.
After their orientation to the building and questions are answered, the two groups are
formed, without prior knowledge of the participants. When pre-planning began, the
19
collegial buzz treatment group met several times throughout the pre-planning schedule to
discuss the PNE program in detail, including the evaluation process and the specifics of
the domains that determined successful completion of the program. Additionally, an in-
depth question and answer session concluded each meeting. The Wolves 101 control
group met only once during pre-planning to receive a brief overview of the program and
its evaluation process. On the first day of school, the collegial buzz treatment group met
to discuss any problems or concerns participants had with the first day of school and any
Treatment Program
The outline for each collegial buzz group meetings can be found in Appendix E
and addressed fifteen areas which research shows are the most important areas for new
teachers to focus their attention to meet the requirements of the PNE program as well as
become highly qualified professional educators. Several of the topics of the collegial
and ethical development, diversity training and integrating technology into the classroom.
Throughout the school year, the collegial buzz treatment group met twice a
month, set for a specific day such that all members are available to meet, for after-school
in-service trainings on each of the domains of the PNE program provided by veteran
teachers or staff development personnel from the researchers school district. At the end
of each nine week session, the PNE team and administrative staff met with each collegial
classroom management techniques. The Wolves 101 group met once a month on un-
specified days for limited PNE discussion groups. Throughout the school year, the
20
standard Preparing New Educators domains are used to observe and evaluate all of the
new teachers performance. At the end of the school year, the Program Evaluation
unofficial FPMS evaluation to test the results of the intervention programs effectiveness.
21
Chapter 4: Results
Introduction
program that will lead to a change in the way the school and the
3. What are the major concerns of teachers and staff regarding the PNE
program?
4. What other PNE programs currently exist in the high school setting?
5. How should the PNE program fit the needs of the school?
The purpose of the research study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Preparing
New Educators program. This type of research study could uncover much of which had
been the questioning behind the education profession are teachers being successfully
prepared for the rigors of teaching and are they being monitored for their progress (or
high school teachers in a paper form, specifically designed to examine the Preparing New
Educators program. The data collected are analyzed by the Individualized Professional
and is followed by statistical data relating to the research questions. The research study
consisted of 40 new high school teachers at a site-based school in a large school district
in the southeast. For the purpose of this applied dissertation study, participants are
teachers, 20 are randomly selected to participate in the Collegial Buzz Group treatment
group. Table 1 on page 93 of this applied dissertation presents the teacher number (for
anonymity purposes) and response rate of surveys provided to new teachers who
Once the statistics are gathered, the summative committee used each of the
instruments and provided the results which are defined throughout this chapter.
Meanwhile, the formative committee discussed the various research questions originally
formulated at the beginning of the study and assessed the state of the program after the
study is conducted. Additionally, the formative committee reviewed how the evaluation
is conducted and suggested that the timeline to conduct the study is effective. The data
are measured by determining the mean, standard deviation, standard error, z-score and t-
Research question 1 is: How can the PNE program be effectively evaluated? In
order to effectively evaluate the PNE program, the researcher used the Individual
participants in the study. Table 2 on page 95 of this applied dissertation presents the
equaled three quality points, Yes, But Needs Work equaled two quality points, and
characterized their needs to be in the areas of professional development, but not limited
to; understanding educational and performance goals, current skill knowledge of school
school/district policies and procedures, time allocation and financial stipends for training,
alternative to the program that will lead to a change in the way the school and the county
presents this program? The answer to this question in chapter 5 and can be found, in part,
researcher to evaluate Appendix C and the results of the evaluation are found in Table 3
on page 97 which concluded that there is a 99 percent confidence level of the results of
the evaluation. The t-score is calculated by using the formula t = 10z + 50, where as the
variable z is obtained by taking the participants score (X) and subtracting the mean score
Workshop had commented that prior to the workshop their understanding of the domains
of the PNE program is not explained in the detail that the researcher provided.
Additionally, the participants stated that they are thankful that the researcher provided an
opportunity to learn the process involved in the completion of the PNE program.
Research question 3 is: What are the major concerns of teachers and staff
regarding the PNE program? Compiled statistical data using Appendix H as a scoring
24
key and is reflected in the calculation worksheet (Appendix I). As a result of the survey,
the participants identified several areas/behaviors that the leader(s) of the PNE program
are incomplete in providing and the area/behavior in parentheses include, but are not
limited to; mentioned that corrective and effective feedback are important (curriculum
development), told everyone that a syllabus was required, but should be completed during
pre-planning time (time management), stated that providing a safe, caring and nurturing
environment was the goal of the school district (classroom management), expressed the
importance of having morals and values as an educator (moral and ethical development),
necessary (parent communication), stated that there are times when the school practices
specific drills to familiarize yourself (the teacher) with the plans (general policies and
procedures), stated that the 21st century will need to include advanced technology in the
classrooms (integrating technology), and briefly stated that there are six (6) domains in
the PNE program (PNE domains introduction). All of these areas/behaviors had an
average response of less that 2.50 from participants and are specifically identified by
Research question 4 is: What other PNE programs currently exist in the high
school setting? After much observation of the participants in the PNE program within
their individual classrooms and during collegial buzz group meetings, as well as the
existed in the high school setting to prepare new educators for the rigors of the education
effectively prepare new educators for the fifteen identified areas of needs of teachers for
25
growth within the profession. Appendix E provides an outline of the fifteen identified
areas. Appendix K provides a reading resource list for the identified areas of need.
Finally, research question 5 is: How should the PNE program fit the needs of the
(Appendix F), the several areas of need as expressed in Table 4 on page 99 of this applied
dissertation which are defined previously in this chapter. Statistically, the treatment
group responded to the surveys, provided in Appendices B and F, with the subsequent
results, identified previously in this chapter, which are tallied using the overall averages
for the responses to Appendix B and the LEADSPNE Administrators Guide (Appendix
G), the LEADSPNE Scoring Key (Appendix H), the LEADSPNE Calculation Worksheet
Analysis of Data
direction and guidance throughout their Preparing New Educators experience. As a result
of the average score being 2.83, whereas the LEADSPNE development team anticipated
the outcome to be closer to the average of 3.13. The statistical evidence concluded that
there are several areas that the researcher believed were cause for concern; therefore the
researcher will provide recommendations in chapter 5 of the changes needed to the PNE
program. This determination can be proven in the statistical and verbal evidence
with the overall PNE process, including the lack of any induction process to the PNE
26
in regards to the PNE program in the comment section of the collegial buzz treatment
group evaluation form, Appendix D, and was described previously in this chapter.
27
Chapter 5: Discussion
Introduction to Dissertation
The purpose of the applied dissertation was to evaluate the Preparing New
Educators program and determine if, in its current state, it was effective in truly preparing
a new teacher for all aspects of the education profession. After surveying prior and
current PNE participants and determining that 80% of new teachers felt they were non-
supported, 75% of new teachers felt that more assistance was needed in instructional
planning, and 35% of new teachers felt that morale was low; the writer was able to focus
on these specific areas to assist in the evaluation of the PNE program. This evaluation
process provided the writer with a great deal of insight into the overall effectiveness of
the program, as well as a strong understanding of the specific needs of the participants in
the program.
The subjects for this study were 40 new teachers from an upper-middle class
neighborhood high school in a large school district in the southeast. Subjects for the
study were selected from a convenience sample and the 20 participants in the treatment
There were three instruments used in the research project. The Individual
Professional Development Plan survey form was used to compile data on the needs of the
participants in the study. Secondly, the New Teacher Induction Program Workshop
promote teamwork amongst members of the PNE program teams. Finally, the
LEADSPNE survey was administered to the study participants to measure the specific
28
needs in the fifteen areas identified by the researcher as statistically significant for
Implications of Findings
According to Neville and Robinson (2003), the key to ensuring that teachers,
principals, and other educators have the knowledge and skills they need to meet the
challenges of todays classrooms is ensuring that they have access to sustained, intensive
professional educator, there must be a system in place that will organize the Preparing
New Educators program into a well-defined, relevant, applicable and effective process.
After careful observation, experimentation and evaluation, it had been determined that
the deficiencies of the PNE program include; a lack of an induction process that
introduces the PNE program for the new teachers entering the profession, inconsistency
in providing training opportunities for the new teachers throughout the process,
and feedback forum provided for new teachers to correct their deficiencies to improve in
Additionally, the following conclusions materialized from the results of the study.
The PNE program can be effectively evaluated using statistical data compiled by the
researcher using mean scores which indicated the average level of responses of the
participants and compared those scores with anticipated outcomes; standard deviation
of values used as a measure of the spread of its values; standard error which is defined as
the standard deviation of the difference between the measured or estimated values and the
29
true values; t-scores (or standardized scores) measured the conversion (transformation) of
raw individual scores into a standard form, where the conversion was made without
knowledge of the population's mean and standard deviation; and the z-scores determined
are several interventions that can be offered as an alternative to the current program that
exists in the school and district that can change the effectiveness of the program. One of
the suggested changes, entitled the New PNE Program, can be found in Appendix E of
this applied dissertation which defines the fifteen areas of need for new teachers.
development training program. The writer recommends that these programs be used
throughout the PNE program process as a major tool for the progression of participants in
As defined in chapter 4, the major concerns of the PNE participants, as well as the
teachers and staff who have completed the PNE program include, but are not limited to;
the belief that the teachers involved in the program are not receiving the guidance,
mentorship, or training needed to grow professionally in education, the time that was
involved in preparing for classes versus the time involved for professional growth was
lacking throughout the school year, and that there was a lack of an induction process that
defines and exemplifies the fifteen areas identified by the writer. Currently there are no
programs that exist in the high school setting that can assist teachers in their professional
develop one-time new teachers into long-term educational professionals through the
effective usage of the PNE program. The PNE program should not be streamlined
30
throughout the writers school district. Each school should have the ability to tailor the
design of the PNE program to fit the needs of the school. It is recommended that through
surveying the new teachers on their professional development needs, as well as utilizing
the districts office of staff development to provide specific trainings, the effectiveness of
the PNE program would be reflected in the results of the teachers ability to provide a
Limitations
This program evaluation and intervention set an attrition rate of 25% percent.
Provided that this rate is not exceeded, the results of the evaluation and subsequent
outcomes in this evaluation process. The first variable is the inability to control the
number of participants in the study that are of the same race, color, creed, ethnicity,
or level of the students in which the new teachers are assigned to teach cannot be
controlled due to the types of courses offered at the researchers worksite. For example,
a senior English teacher may have been assigned only twenty students to his/her honors
class, while a freshmen American Government teacher may have had as many as thirty-
five regular level students. Thirdly, the level of education that each new teacher had will
vary between required bachelors degrees and masters degrees, as well as concentration
areas. Also, because of the extreme teacher shortage in the state, many new teachers had
alternative certification in areas that are not related to education, yet are still allowed to
teach regular education students provided they agree to take part in both the PNE
program and the researchers school districts Alternative Certification Program. There
31
are equal numbers in each group. Limitations also altered the results of the evaluation.
One such limitation is the amount of available time and space for collegial buzz group
and Wolves 101 meetings. Additionally, availability of the support personnel for
collegial buzz group meetings is limited due to inability to require teachers to remain
Outcomes
positive and successful induction process for new teachers entering the profession. The
accomplishments of our education system and the students, parents, stakeholders and
tremendous pressure to get everything going at once! Remember that running all of your
number of different preparations, demands familiarity with the content and management
of each program, the development and preparation of materials and the establishment of
the learning skills necessary to function successfully in each class. All of these take time.
Ask more experienced teachers for reality checks or suggestions for pacing, prioritizing
and implementing that will work for you (Bluestein, 2007). Dr. Bluestein provided
tremendous advice to those just entering the education profession look for guidance
from those who have been there before. Build a support system by identifying one or
several members of your staff with whom you feel capable of developing a close working
32
relationship. Approach people with a blend of confidence and openness. You may be new
and willing to grow, but you are also a very capable person and you belong there as much
as anyone (2007).
Summary
The writer believes that all new educators to the school district, through proper
training and education, will embrace the envisioned PNE program wholeheartedly due to
intrinsic qualities that are correlated to the desire to attain employment in the education
profession. Additionally, the writer knows that there have been no recent efforts made to
examine the PNE program and assess its effectiveness. Therefore, any members of the
school district willing to take on this daunting task are supported by all levels of the
school district staff. Finally, any person who enters education and believes that there is
no room for improvement is not an experienced educator. In other words, teachers do not
enter into the education field for money, fame, or power. Teachers go into the education
profession to watch children grow into responsible young men and women and for that
Recommendations
various site-based schools in the writers school district with a larger heterogeneous
possibly alter the current Preparing New Educators program. A more comprehensive
study without time constraints or limitations as to participants within the study should
mentoring practices for new teachers being conducted nationwide and the implementation
33
of such practices to be included in the various Preparing New Educators programs, or the
like, in school districts throughout the country. It is the responsibility of the school
resources to improve the teaching profession. By doing so, the general public will view
the teaching profession as one in which the level of respect, as well as the level of
References
Bluestein, J. (2007). Great Expectations: Good News for Beginning Teachers. Retrieved
on May 22, 2007 from http://www.janebluestein.com/articles/great_exps.html
Floden, R.E., & Wilson, S.M. (2003). Creating Effective Teachers: Concise Answers for
Hard Questions. An Addendum to the Report Teacher Preparation Research:
Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations. Michigan: Education
Commission of States, American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education,
& ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED476366)
Joe E. Newsome High School Advisory Council (2004). School Improvement Goals for
2004 - 2005. Retrieved October 31, 2005 from
http://apps.sdhc.k12.fl.us/sdhc2/schoolsite/SIPPLANS/3171.pdf
Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2005). The adult learner (6th ed.). Houston:
Gulf Publishing.
Moir, E. (2003). Launching the Next Generation of Teachers through Quality Induction.
California: National Commission on Teaching and Americas Future. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED479764)
Pedro, J. (2006). Taking Reflection in the Real World of Teaching. Indianapolis, IN:
Kappa Delta Pi Record. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ738071).
Solis, A. (2004). The Role of mentoring in Teacher Quality and Retention. San Antonio,
TX: Intercultural Development Research Association. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED484937).
Vermont Early Childhood Work Group (2001). Planning Your Professional Growth:
Creating an Individualized Professional Development Plan for Early Care and
Education. Vermont: Professional Preparation and Development Committee of
the Vermont Early Childhood Work Group. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. 455970).
Appendices
37
Appendix A
The Problem(s)
- Lack of Induction Program for New Educators
- Lack of Mentoring/Coaching Support Staff for New Educators
- Lack of Formal Pre-Service Training for New Educators
Appendix B
Professional Development
Where Are You Now?
Scoring Guide:
a. Yes b. Yes, But Needs Work c. No
a b c Statements About Our School
10. Our school leadership and staff understand the underlying causes of gaps between
student performance and goals.
11. Our school leadership understands what teacher skills, knowledge, and
competencies/behaviors are needed to close gaps between student goals and actual
performance.
12. Our school leadership understands the actual current skill, knowledge, and
competency level of staff.
Development below)
Share the PD Plan with School Community
29. Our schools parents, neighbors, and other stakeholders are informed about our PD
efforts.
30. We use a variety of media to inform stakeholders about PD efforts.
31. We share the results of PD efforts with our school community.
Appendix C
Appendix D
3 4
teaching profession prior to the workshop?
3 4
subject or discipline you are designated to
teach?
3 4
peers for help prior to the workshop?
3 4
workshop presented by the leader?
5
47
3 4
the PNE program prior to the workshop.
3 4
the PNE program after the workshop.
3 4
peer for help after participating in the
workshop?
3 4
of the leader of the workshop?
3 4
the classroom now that the workshop
isover?
3 4
effectiveness of the workshop?
48
A dditional C omments:
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
____
Appendix E
Interactive Notebook
Appendix F
LEADSPNE Survey
LEAD
Leadership Survey for Preparing New Educators
A paper and pencil 360-degree measurement tool for assessing
leadership of the preparing new educators program
Introduction
Thank you for participating in this survey/assessment of the preparing new educators
program. This survey/assessment will provide valuable information to the leadership
within the School District of Hillsborough County. Your answers provided will assist in
the development, instructional leadership and overall effectiveness of the preparing new
educators program. The primary goal of this program is to improve the instructional
personnel within the School District of Hillsborough County by focusing on the needs of
the new educator, therefore providing feedback to the leadership of the program.
County. A 360-degree measurement tool allows the evaluator to look at three dimensions
(a survey across, up, and down), providing a statistically significant amount of
information which simplistic forms of surveys cannot attain. Unlike other measurement
instruments, this LEADSPNE is completely anonymous therefore you should answer
the survey as honest as possible. The survey/assessment is completely objective and
user-friendly. Additionally, there are no written responses on the survey/assessment. It
is noted by the author of the survey/assessment that written comments can distract the
respondent from answering the questions openly and freely.
INSTRUCTIONS
1. For each scale, circle the bullet that best reflects the School District of Hillsborough
Countys Preparing New Educators program leadership components.
Example:
The leader in the PNE program
In this instance, the evaluator decided that the information that is being provided by the
leadership in the Preparing New Educators program is slightly more directive than
suggestive as far as self-conceptualization. If the evaluator felt that the information is
provided by the leadership had both directive and suggestive, then the evaluator would
have circled the middle bullet. It is important for the evaluator to answer each with a
first impression approach, rather than contemplate over the correct answer or the
answer that the person wants to hear.
When you have completed the survey, please place it in a sealed envelope and place it in
my mailbox at the school. If you are providing answers to the survey outside of the
school, please place it in a sealed envelope and give it to your schools administrator of
curriculum and it will be picked up by an authorized person.
Marc J. Summa
Nova Southeastern University
Joe E. Newsome High School
55
LEADSP
*Please note: In ALL of the questions, the following statement precedes each item:
The leader in the PNE program
Curriculum
Development
Provided several . . . . . Spoke briefly on questioning
ways to ask strategies
effective questions
Mentioned that . . . . . Described how to provide
corrective and corrective and effective
effective feedback feedback
are important
Talked about . . . . . Gave examples and details
engaging students on how to engage students in
in class discussions the curriculum using
relevant materials
Practiced situations . . . . . Spoke about activities that
thorough role play / can be used in the classroom
interactions with
PNE program
participants
Time
Management,
Multitasking, and
Syllabus
Development
Described time . . . . . Provided specific examples
management as of time management skills
something you and techniques
should have as a
professional
56
educator
Exemplified . . . . . Stated that there are times
multitasking when multitasking
through extended isnecessary during the school
discussion on day
continuity and
withitness
Reminded the . . . . . Provided detailed examples
participants that and non-examples of
they should have a effective and informative
syllabus for the syllabi
students on the first
day
Told everyone that . . . . . Allowed for PNE program
a syllabus participants to practice
isrequired, but writing syllabi for their
should be courses
completed during
pre-planning time
Classroom
Management and
Discipline
Provided useful and . . . . . Explained that it is necessary
relevant classroom to control the students in the
management classroom in order to teach
strategies
Used examples and . . . . . Stated that the instructional
non-examples of personnel handbook had
when to discipline information about when a
students according student should be disciplined
to district
guidelines
Used examples and . . . . . Showed the PNE program
non-examples of participants what a referral
how to discipline sheet looks like and referred
students according to the instructional personnel
to district handbook for additional
guidelines information
Stated that . . . . . Practiced/shared examples of
providing a safe, how to create an
caring and environment conducive to
nurturing learning
environment is the
goal of the school
district
University to
Professional
57
Transition
Examined, in detail, . . . . . Provided a list of names of
the various theories the different theorists and
and their what they believed
applications to the
teaching process
Briefly explained . . . . . Allowed PNE program
that there are four participants to use the
components of knowledge gained from the
developmental theories to develop their own
theories; personal understanding of
intelligence, the connection between
language, intelligence, language,
personality, and personality, and socialization
socialization
Provided a forum . . . . . Explained that these theories
for PNE program are useful, but are not a
participants to necessary part of the every
synthesize the day activities during school
information on hours
developmental
theories and discuss
them with other
educators
Stated that these . . . . . Asked probing questions on
theories have a how the PNE program
correlation to the participants plan on using
decision-making these theories to enhance
process and can be their decision-making and
applied to apply the theories to
instructional knowledge and instruction
techniques
Moral and Ethical
Development
Expressed the . . . . . Discussed the details of the
importance of need for awareness and
having morals and understanding of the morals
values as an and values expected of a
educator professional educator
Discussed the . . . . . Stated that the state of
details of the Code Florida had a Code of Ethics
of Ethics and and Principles of
Principles of Professional Standards to
Professional follow as an educator
Standards in the
state of Florida
58
organizational skills
Introduced the . . . . . Expressed that an Interactive
Interactive Notebook allows students to
Notebook as a great get organized
organizational tool
and why all
educators can use it
as an easy and
functional form of
organization
Showed examples . . . . . Passed around an example of
of the Interactive an exemplary Interactive
Notebook, its many Notebook
uses, and how to
get students to set-
theirs-up, as well
as a how to for
teacher
organization using
the notebook
Allowed for each . . . . . Stated that the PNE program
PNE program participants can use this
participant and Interactive Notebook to
opportunity to organize their information
create their own from the LEADSPNE
Interactive program
Notebook using the
information from
the LEADSPNE
program
General Policies
and Procedures
(school and
district)
Passed out the . . . . . Distributed the school
school district district policy and procedure
policies and guidebook and went in-depth
procedures into several areas of great
guidebook and importance for new
recommended that educators to understand,
it be read at the highlight and tab
PNE program
participants leisure
Distributed the site- . . . . . Passed out the site-based
based schools schools policies and
policy and procedures guidebook and
procedure recommended that it be read
61
Appendix G
LEAD
Leadership Survey for Preparing New Educators
A paper and pencil 360-degree measurement tool for assessing
leadership of the preparing new educators program
An Administrators
Introduction
Thank you for participating as an administrative leader for the LEADSPNE program. By
being the administrative leader, you are providing valuable feedback to the School
District of Hillsborough County in the further development, instructional leadership and
overall effectiveness of the preparing new educators program. Your assistance is greatly
appreciated.
2. Select evaluators.
LEADSPNE will attain evaluators from each site-based school and monitor their role
through a secondary source unknown to the evaluator. The site-based evaluator must
agree to the provisions and procedures of the LEADSPNE program.
The distribution of the survey will be done by each site-based evaluator and their role
will to distribute, monitor the completion of, and collect the survey/assessment via sealed
envelope and/or personal collection. Any tampering to the materials will invalidate the
responses of the participants at the site-based school. The evaluator must provide the
participants an opportunity to turn-in their surveys anonymously in order to maintain
confidentiality of the assessment tool.
4. Compile statistics.
Using Appendix H, I, and J (in the proceeding sections), it is the role of the evaluator to
compile all of the data and create a measurement summary based on the answers
provided by the LEADSPNE participants.
LEADSPNE wants to provide all participants with statistical feedback on the survey they
participated in and believes that numerical information provides the best source for
69
LEADSPNE program would like to encourage the evaluator to provide an opportunity for
each participant to discuss the results of the survey/assessment if necessary.
Appointments can be made with the evaluator at the evaluators/participants
convenience.
Review Appendices I and J with the participant. The evaluator will allow the
participant enough time to consider the results and to ask questions. Note:
Evaluator may give the participant Appendices I and J to keep if they so
choose.
Marc J. Summa
Nova Southeastern University
Joe E. Newsome High School
70
Appendix H
APPENDIX H
LEADSPNE
Curriculum
Development
Provided several Spoke briefly on questioning
5 4 3 2 1
ways to ask strategies
effective questions
Mentioned that 1 2 3 4 5 Described how to provide
corrective and corrective and effective
effective feedback feedback
are important
Talked about 1 2 3 4 5 Gave examples and details
engaging students on how to engage students in
in class discussions the curriculum using
relevant materials
Practiced situations 5 4 3 2 1 Spoke about activities that
thorough role play can be used in the classroom
/ interactions with
PNE program
participants
Time
Management,
Multitasking, and
Syllabus
Development
Described time 1 2 3 4 5 Provided specific examples
management as of time management skills
something you and techniques
should have as a
professional
educator
Exemplified 5 4 3 2 1 Stated that there are times
multitasking when multitasking is
through extended necessary during the school
72
discussion on day
continuity and
withitness
Reminded the 1 2 3 4 5 Provided detailed examples
participants that and non-examples of
they should have a effective and informative
syllabus for the syllabi
students on the first
day
Told everyone that 1 2 3 4 5 Allowed for PNE program
a syllabus is participants to practice
required, but writing syllabi for their
should be courses
completed during
pre-planning time
Classroom
Management and
Discipline
Provided useful 5 4 3 2 1 Explained that it is necessary
and relevant to control the students in the
classroom classroom in order to teach
management
strategies
Used examples and 5 4 3 2 1 Stated that the instructional
non-examples of personnel handbook had
when to discipline information about when a
students according student should be disciplined
to district
guidelines
Used examples and 5 4 3 2 1 Showed the PNE program
non-examples of participants what a referral
how to discipline sheet looks like and referred
students according to the instructional personnel
to district handbook for additional
guidelines information
Stated that 1 2 3 4 5 Practiced/shared examples of
providing a safe, how to create an
caring and environment conducive to
nurturing learning
environment is the
goal of the school
district
University to
Professional
Transition
Examined, in 5 4 3 2 1 Provided a list of names of
detail, the various the different theorists and
73
play using
hypothetical
situations
regarding moral
and ethical
decision-making
and discuss their
feelings on the
situation
Described the 5 4 3 2 1 Expressed that as educators
details of the we will face consequences
consequences that for our actions
an educator can
face if they are
questioned on their
moral and ethical
beliefs during
interactions with
students,
colleagues, or
community
members
Parent Contact
and
Communication
Described the 5 4 3 2 1 Stated that parent
various ways in communication is important
which educators
communicate with
parents at the site-
based school and at
the district level
Exemplified the 5 4 3 2 1 Expressed that it is a good
use of positive idea to contact parents for
phone calls, e- good and bad behavior
mails, notes home,
etc. to stimulate
student
achievement within
a classroom
Explained that an 1 2 3 4 5 Discussed effective parent-
educator should teacher conferences using
expect to have role play and hypothetical
parent-teacher situations with PNE program
conferences when participants
necessary
75
organizational skills
Introduced the 5 4 3 2 1 Expressed that an Interactive
Interactive Notebook allows students to
Notebook as a get organized
great
organizational tool
and why all
educators can use it
as an easy and
functional form of
organization
Showed examples 5 4 3 2 1 Passed around an example of
of the Interactive an exemplary Interactive
Notebook, its many Notebook
uses, and how to
get students to
set-theirs-up, as
well as a how to
for teacher
organization using
the notebook
Allowed for each 5 4 3 2 1 Stated that the PNE program
PNE program participants can use this
participant and Interactive Notebook to
opportunity to organize their information
create their own from the LEADSPNE
Interactive program
Notebook using the
information from
the LEADSPNE
program
General Policies
and Procedures
(school and
district)
Passed out the 1 2 3 4 5 Distributed the school
school district district policy and procedure
policies and guidebook and went in-depth
procedures into several areas of great
guidebook and importance for new
recommended that educators to understand,
it be read at the highlight and tab
PNE program
participants
leisure
Distributed the 5 4 3 2 1 Passed out the site-based
site-based schools schools policies and
77
(i.e. Elementary,
Middle or High
School)
Introduced the 5 4 3 2 1 Stated that Linda Alberts
PNE program Cooperative Discipline is
participants to the an excellent book and should
work of Linda be read by all new educators
Alberts in the profession
Cooperative
Discipline and
discussed excerpts
from the book that
are applicable to
the specific
educational setting
(i.e. Elementary,
Middle or High
School
Allowed for PNE 5 4 3 2 1 Showed an example of one
program of Harry Wongs techniques
participants to role for professional educators
play using
hypothetical
situations using
Harry Wongs
The First Day of
School
Showed an 1 2 3 4 5 Allowed for PNE program
example of one of participants to role play
Linda Alberts using hypothetical situations
beliefs for using Linda Alberts
professional Cooperative Discipline
educators
Integrating
Technology into
the Curriculum
Stated that the 21st 1 2 3 4 5 Detailed the statistical
Century will need evidence showing the need
to include to integrate technology into
advanced the curriculum at all levels of
technology in the education
classrooms
Provided detailed 5 4 3 2 1 Expressed how important
examples of the using differentiated forms of
various formats technology in the classroom
that material can be is important to student
introduced to achievement
79
students using
several different
technological
resources
Provided hands-on 5 4 3 2 1 Gave handouts to the PNE
training using the program participants listing
various forms of the various forms of
technology technology available for
amongst the classroom use
participants of the
PNE program
Provided a CD- 1 2 3 4 5 Allowed for PNE program
Rom that could be participants to use advanced
used by PNE technology to create
program programs, databases,
participants to presentations, etc. to be used
practice using for classroom instruction
technology at their
own leisure
School
Involvement,
Coaching, and
Club Sponsorship
Described the 5 4 3 2 1 Stated that the school is
details of how a always looking for people to
new teacher can join committees and
become involved in volunteer
the school through
committee
membership and
volunteering
Gave advanced 5 4 3 2 1 Reinforced that coaching is a
information and good way to get involved
examples of with the school
paperwork
involved in
coaching, along
with rules and
regulations of
coaching athletics
in the school
district
Provided an outline 5 4 3 2 1 Explained the need for clubs
for all of the club and student organizations in
sponsorship order to keep students
opportunities as interested in school outside
well as the of the academia
80
requirements for
clubs to maintain
their active status
at the school
Reminded the PNE 1 2 3 4 5 Gave specific details on how
program to collect money, maintain
participants that records, order
they will have a lot equipment/materials, and
of things to keep budget for
track of if they are awards/projects/banquets/etc.
involved in for clubs and organizations
coaching and/or
club sponsorship
ESE/IEPs/504
Plans/ESOL
Provided detailed 5 4 3 2 1 States that at some point in
information an educators career that an
regarding the IEP will be needed to be
essentials of the completed and submitted to
IEP process, the ESE department
documentation and
completion of the
IEP for ESE
students
Showed the PNE 1 2 3 4 5 Allowed PNE program
program participants to work together
participants what to complete a detailed IEP
an IEP form looks form on a student in a
like hypothetical situation
Discussed the 5 4 3 2 1 Stated that the district had
current school specific procedures that all
district procedures district employees must
for ESE/IEP/504 follow regarding IEP
Plans and how they students
are implemented in
the instructional
classroom
Defined ESOL. 1 2 3 4 5 Explained the needs for
Stated that ESOL ESOL students and used
is something that examples to show how to
all district work with these students
employees must be
trained on
FPMS
(Performance
Pay)/National
Board
81
Certification
Shows a Florida 1 2 3 4 5 Clearly defines and describes
Performance the six (6) domains used in
Measurement the Florida Performance
System worksheet Measurement System
to all PNE program
participants
States that the 1 2 3 4 5 Explains, in detail, the
Florida relevance and importance of
Performance the FPMS and that it is an
Measurement essential measurement tool
System scale is of overall instructional needs
used to measure
instructional
deficiencies and
successes
Explains what it 5 4 3 2 1 Talks about the existence of
means to be the National Board Certified
Nationally Board opportunity for exceptional
Certified and why teachers
it is important to
the education
system
Describes the 5 4 3 2 1 Explains that Nationally
details of how Board Certified Teachers
Nationally Board make additional money
Certified teachers beyond their yearly salary
not only make
more money, but
how their role as
being NBC effects
other teachers, the
site-based school
and the school
district as a whole
PNE Domains
Introduction
Provides specific 5 4 3 2 1 Explains that all new
details on who teachers to the district or new
participates in and to the education profession
how the PNE must complete the PNE
program prepares program
new educators
Describes the role 5 4 3 2 1 Provides the names of the
of each member of members of the PNE team
the PNE Team and
how they
82
contribute to the
program
Briefly states that 1 2 3 4 5 Defines and details each of
there are six (6) the six (6) domains of the
domains in the PNE program
PNE program
Explains the details 5 4 3 2 1 Gives dates of observations
of the procedures and assigns a mentoring
of the PNE team
program including
a timeline for the
program, how to
prepare for the
beginning of the
program, what to
expect throughout
the program, and
how to successfully
complete the
program
83
Appendix I
APPENDIX I
LEADSPNE
Area/Behavior
(Positive Behavior In Bold)
Average
Score for
Area/Behavior
(Positive Behavior In Bold)
Behavior
84
Curriculum Development
Provided several ways to ask ______ Spoke briefly on questioning
effective questions strategies
Described how to provide ______ Mentioned that corrective and
corrective and effective feedback effective feedback are important
Gave examples and details on Talked about engaging students
how to engage students in the in class discussions
curriculum using relevant ______
materials
Practiced situations thorough role Spoke about activities that can
play / interactions with PNE be used in the classroom
program participants ______
Add average scores for Divide by 4
Curriculum Development: Curriculum Development
______ Score:______
Time Management,
Multitasking, and Syllabus
Development
Described time management as ______ Provided specific examples of
something you should have as a time management skills and
professional educator techniques
Exemplified multitasking ______ Stated that there are times when
through extended discussion on multitasking is necessary
continuity and withitness during the school day
Reminded the participants that ______ Provided detailed examples and
they should have a syllabus for non-examples of effective and
the students on the first day informative syllabi
Told everyone that a syllabus is ______ Allowed for PNE program
required, but should be participants to practice writing
completed during pre-planning syllabi for their courses
time
Add average scores for Divide by 4
TM / Multitasking / Syllabus TM / Multitasking / Syllabus
Development:_________ Development
Score:__________
Classroom Management and
Discipline
Provided useful and relevant ______ Explained that it is necessary to
classroom management strategies control the students in the
classroom in order to teach
Used examples and non- ______ Stated that the instructional
examples of when to discipline personnel handbook had
students according to district information about when a
guidelines student should be disciplined
Used examples and non- ______ Showed the PNE program
examples of how to discipline participants what a referral sheet
85
Discussed the details of the Code ______ Stated that the state of Florida
of Ethics and Principles of had a Code of Ethics and
Professional Standards in the Principles of Professional
state of Florida Standards to follow as an
educator
Allowed for PNE program ______ Gave an example of how an
participants to role play using educator can be disciplined for
hypothetical situations regarding using unethical behavior
moral and ethical decision-
making and discuss their feelings
on the situation
Described the details of the ______ Expressed that as educators we
consequences that an educator will face consequences for our
can face if they are questioned on actions
their moral and ethical beliefs
during interactions with students,
colleagues, or community
members
Add average scores for Moral / Divide by 4
Ethical Development: Moral / Ethical Development
___________ Score:__________
Parent Contact and
Communication
Described the various ways in ______ Stated that parent
which educators communicate communication is important
with parents at the site-based
school and at the district level
Exemplified the use of positive ______ Expressed that it is a good idea
phone calls, e-mails, notes home, to contact parents for good and
etc. to stimulate student bad behavior
achievement within a classroom
Explained that an educator ______ Discussed effective parent-
should expect to have parent- teacher conferences using role
teacher conferences when play and hypothetical situations
necessary with PNE program participants
Eluded to the fact that an ______ Specified the policies and
educator should expect to host procedures involved in hosting
parents for conference nights and conference nights and open
open house night house for parents and the
expectations of the educator
during both
Add average scores for Parent Divide by 4
Contact and Communication: Parent Contact and
___________ Communication
Score:__________
Project CRISS Strategies
87
trained on students
Add average scores for Divide by 4
ESE/IEPs/504 Plans/ESOL: ESE/IEPs/504 Plans/ESOL
___________ Score:__________
FPMS (Performance
Pay)/National Board
Certification
Shows a Florida Performance ______ Clearly defines and describes
Measurement System worksheet the six (6) domains used in the
to all PNE program participants Florida Performance
Measurement System
States that the Florida ______ Explains, in detail, the relevance
Performance Measurement and importance of the FPMS
System scale is used to measure and that it is an essential
instructional deficiencies and measurement tool of overall
successes instructional needs
Explains what it means to be ______ Talks about the existence of the
Nationally Board Certified and National Board Certified
why it is important to the opportunity for exceptional
education system teachers
Describes the details of how ______ Explains that Nationally Board
Nationally Board Certified Certified Teachers make
teachers not only make more additional money beyond their
money, but how their role as yearly salary
being NBC effects other
teachers, the site-based school
and the school district as a whole
Add average scores for Divide by 4
FPMS/NBC: ___________ FPMS/NBC Score:__________
PNE Domains Introduction
Provides specific details on who ______ Explains that all new teachers to
participates in and how the PNE the district or new to the
program prepares new education profession must
educators complete the PNE program
Describes the role of each ______ Provides the names of the
member of the PNE Team and members of the PNE team
how they contribute to the
program
Briefly states that there are six ______ Defines and details each of the
(6) domains in the PNE program six (6) domains of the PNE
program
Explains the details of the ______ Gives dates of observations and
procedures of the PNE program assigns a mentoring team
including a timeline for the
program, how to prepare for the
beginning of the program, what
92
Appendix J
APPENDIX J
LEADSPNE
Leadership Area/Behavior Your
Score
*Anticipated Average Score
*(Based on LEADSPNE
development team
expectations)
Curriculum Development ______ 3.5
Development
Classroom Management and ______ 3.5
Discipline
University to Professional ______ 4.0
Transition
Moral and Ethical ______ 4.0
Development
Parent Contact and ______ 3.0
Communication
Project CRISS Strategies ______ 4.0
Appendix K
APPENDIX K
LEADSPNE
Leadership
Area/Behavior
Reading
No. ED476366)
Time Bethower, D. & Smalley, K. (1998). Performance-based
Management, instruction: Linking training to business results. San Francisco:
Multitasking, Jossey-Bass.
and Syllabus
Development
AND Classroom
Management
and Discipline
University to Neville, K. & Robinson, C (2003). The Delivery, Financing,
Professional and Assessment Professional Development in Education: Pre-
Transition Service Preparation and In-Service Training. Washington D.C.:
Institute of Education Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED482979).
Moral and Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2005). The adult
Ethical learner (6th ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Development
AND
Parent Contact
and
Communication
Project CRISS Joe E. Newsome High School Advisory Council (2004).
Strategies School Improvement Goals for 2004 - 2005.
AND Retrieved October 31, 2005 from
Interactive http://apps.sdhc.k12.fl.us/sdhc2/schoolsite/SIPPLANS/3171.pdf
Notebook
AND
General Policies
and Procedures
(school and
district)
AND
First Day of
School/Semester
Procedures
AND
Integrating
Technology into
the Curriculum
School Moir, E. (2003). Launching the Next Generation of Teachers
Involvement, through Quality Induction. California: National Commission on
Coaching, and Teaching and Americas Future. (ERIC Document
Club Reproduction Service No. ED479764)
Sponsorship
ESE/IEPs/504 Vermont Early Childhood Work Group (2001). Planning Your
Plans/ESOL Professional Growth: Creating an Individualized Professional
Development Plan for Early Care and Education. Vermont:
97
Tables
99
Table 1
Teacher Number and Percentage of the Rate of Participation in the LEADSPNE Survey
Process
Table 1
Teacher Number and Percentage of the Rate of Participation in the LEADSPNE Survey
Process
IPDP 20 85
LEADSPNE 20 85
Table 2
Table 2
Table 3
Table 3
Question Average T- Z-
Number Score Score Score
1 3.15 -25.40 -7.54
+1.96 error)
+2.58 error)
105
Table 4
Table 4