Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Professor Karen Busby
1994-95
Outline by Casey Chisick
I. COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS
14.02 Proceedings shall be by action, unless otherwise required by statute or the rules.
Generally, when facts are not known or are likely to be contested.
Proceed by discovery process - resolution not likely in less than two years
14.05(2) Cases in which proceeding may be commenced by application (formerly originating notice of
motion).
14.05(2)(c) Specific types of relief for which applications may commence proceedings
Applications are also appropriate when facts are not in dispute
Proceed by affidavit evidence - resolution within weeks or months
Affidavit - written statement of enumerated evidence - carefully drawn to present ones case in the
most positive light possible, so not great evidence.
JURISDICTION:
Superior courts: general and inherent jurisdiction (e.g., Manitoba Q.B.)
Federal Court: limited and specific jurisdiction
TYPES OF PLEADINGS
Statement of claim
Statement of defence
Statement of defence and counter-claim
Statement of defence and third party claim
Cross-claim - one defendant sues a co-defendant
An advocate is not merely a mouthpiece - doesnt necessarily take any position the client wants, but
rather advises the client as to the best possible route.
FEES
excessive fees = professional misconduct
Duty to client:
minimum fees possible
status reports
breakdown of fees
lawyer is responsible for paying any charges incurred on the clients behalf (RETAINER!)
formal relationship cannot be terminated without clients consent or court order, but client can fire
lawyer at any time, except at the eleventh hour.
inform client about availability of Legal Aid
NEGOTIATION
duty to be accurate and fair, and not to mislead other counsel regarding your clients wishes
unethical to settle based on false information, even if information changed after settlement was
already reached
DISCLOSURE
full disclosure is the rule - must even disclose the existence of those documents which you say the
opposition cant see.
full disclosure must be certified by client
duty to correct answers in examination for discovery if facts subsequently change
AT TRIAL
If client suddenly begins to present evidence contrary to what was previously said, lawyer must
request adjournment - cant assist in deceiving court.
The word of the lawyer, as an officer of the court, is automatically accepted as fact unless challenged
by the other lawyer. Therefore, pre-trial agreement on facts saves time at trial.
EVIDENCE
Preparation of witness to testify is both ethical and advisable - evidence can be packaged, but not
tailored - cant coach witness in terms of what substantially to say.
Once client has begun to testify, cant discuss with him anything that has already been dealt with, only
with items yet to come.
During cross-examination, cant talk to client about the case at all, in case re-examination is
necessary
If opposition overlooks a relevant case, your duty as an officer of the court is to disclose it, even if it
may hurt your case - you can attempt to distinguish it before the judge discovers it.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
your firm cannot also represent the opposing party
shouldnt answer questions from media unless certain that its in the clients best interests
Civil Procedure 3
III. DISCOVERY
ask other side to admit that certain facts and documents are true
deemed to have admitted them unless specifically denied (or if no response)