September 23 2008 Frank Gallagher

34 Riverglen Drive
Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Keswick, On.
L4P 2P8
Canada Post: Bag Service 1722
905-476-8959
Ottawa, Ontario frank@cdf.name
K1P 0B3
Fax-613-952-8045 Manager
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317

Re: Request Review of my Complaint

RCMP refuse to investigate
Government corruption and conspiracy

Dear Commission Representative

I have received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by Superintendent
Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area and he informs if I wish to exercise my right to a
review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by contacting the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP at Canada Post: Bag Service 1722, Fax-613-952-8045, and
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca

I do wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint. I have had some
difficulties communicating with Andree Leduc, Enquiries and Complaints Analyst at the 7337 137 Street,
Suite 102, Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4 office so I am submitting this Request for Review of my
Complaint by both Fax-613-952-8045 and your on line form at www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca.

Andree Leduc will get the whole document by e-mail along with the rest on the AAAAALIST

All pertinent evidence regarding this Request for Review of my Complaint is published or referenced on
the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition
affiliate web site of the Charter Democracy Force
All evidence published on this site is pertinent including correspondence with Andree Leduc of your
Surrey, British Columbia Office.

The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 implicates Inspector Robert Davis to be in
on the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the details are explained in
document “Request Review of Complaint September 23 2008” published on the aforementioned web site
of which this is the first page.

1
The links to the evidence originally published on the sites referenced in my original complaint to your office
November 8 2007 were corrupted so I opened a new site CDF Documents and transferred pertinent evidence there
informing Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam and everyone else published on the AAAAALIST
of the original Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force The
CDF Documents web site can be accessed from this site. .

It would be prudent to mention that I have been providing the irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime
of corruption and conspiracy to Sergeant Michael Thomson of the Milton RCMP office since January 18 2006 when
he responded to the evidence I originally left with Inspector Peter Goulet of the Newmarket detachment dated
November 15 2005.
On January 3 2006 Inspector P. Goulet wrote to inform the evidence was originally reviewed by members of the
Federal Enforcement Section and it was learned I was concerned about possible offences under the Canada Business
Act.
The Act falls under the investigative mandate of the RCMP Commercial Crime Section also located in Newmarket
and was being forwarded on to them for review.
I had indeed originally requested the RCMP address the relative issues regarding my former tenant Don Wilson
president and director of Bio Safe under the Canada Business Corporations Act, Part XIX Paragraph 229 (1)
having already attempted to get the York Regional Police to deal with Don Wilson under the Criminal Code and
Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but they declined to do so.

By the time I went to the RCMP with the November 15 2005 cover letter and evidence I had already tried several
government departments to address the issues that occurred June 30 2005 at the ORHT but to no avail, so that is the
reason I presented the issues in different manner under the Canada Business Act to try my luck that way.
This is all documented on the Golden Rule for Society …Gold for Law Society web site
http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-
society-
under the heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police Compiled A – C documents now available on the
“RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site along with other pertinent evidence.

You must remember I was just a victim experienced in another field of endeavour with no experience in how the
police carried on business at the time and simply provided the evidence that crimes had been committed by my
former tenant and president of a company that I had invested in and thought they would be dealt with by
professional people in these matters not realizing I had to dot (t) s and cross (i) s and follow procedures I was not
aware of or experienced in.
I was under the opinion at the time that the people financed all government personnel involved in the administration
and enforcement of the law to be proficient competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction
to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter of equal protection and benefits
consistent with the Constitution and the Police Services Act.
My opinion has never wavered.

Police Services Act

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles

1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they
serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

2
It is all about common sense and the law, not aware at the time the absence of it throughout the personnel
of the system but with further thought and reason determined it was too consistent to be incompetence and
eventually proved it was deliberate organized crime of corruption and conspiracy by members of the Law
Societies beginning in the very first line of the Charter, all documented on the web sites.

The Sergeant Michael Thomson e-mail dated January 18 2006 specifically states that I proposed an
investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the Canada Business Act and as such investigated the
evidence

This information is all published on my web sites that RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam investigated
and states in his interim report dated May 20 2008 that he felt he should be thorough and thoughtful when
forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence.

Since Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area does not comprehend the
need to be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction for the safety and
wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor is he
competent to command a police force consistent with the Police Services Act I will just address the issues
he stated in his September 3 2008 Final Letter of Disposition, which is self-evident

In such serious matters of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy well documented and
filed with you on November 8 2007 and studied by Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam in a manner he felt was
thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence as he states in his
interim report dated May 20 2008, and finally completed on July 11 2008 as stated in the letter from the
Professional Standards Unit signed by Sergeant Karen Delorey, after 8 months of studying the prodigious
amount of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy published on
my web sites that had been provided to Inspector Brian Verheul, Milton detachment via e-mail addressed
to Sergeant Michael Thomson since January 18 2006 it is incomprehensible that the final 2 page report
dated September 3 2008 by Superintendent Robert Davis only contained a little more than one page of
relative text, especially since he states Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam was a veteran investigator.

It states in the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP pamphlet Andree Leduc mailed me
when confirming my complaint that if the CPC carries out a further investigation an investigator will
gather all the information relevant to the complaint and will conduct interviews with me, the RCMP
members(s) involved, and any witnesses.

The pertinent evidence is published on my Charter Democracy Force web sites aforementioned and the
report by Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is now pertinent evidence having spent 8 months studying the
evidence thorough and thoughtful and of course he is a pertinent witness to attest that the report the RCMP
present at the review is in fact the report that he prepared for the investigation of the complaint.
Superintendent Robert Davis is also a pertinent witness to attest that the final report he sent me after 1 ¾
months reviewing Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report is indeed the report he prepared.

I ask that you immediately request a copy of Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report to ensure no
time is allowed for a fixed new replacement report.
A copy of Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is enclosed.

It is within your competence to determine if they are consistent with each other.

Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008

3
 False statements are underlined
Paragraphs

1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to understand
the circumstances surrounding my complaint
That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report
3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s report and wishes to share with me the results.
4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint, the
RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.

He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided to
Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is irrefutable to
the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he refused to take the
evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that I had been sending to
Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address and I could continue to send evidence via the same
method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint with the commission
November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we met on October 7 2007,
(Correction-October 18 2007 not October 7 2007) perhaps a note on the file. As far
as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul
instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence and is therefore responsible for
Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of time to confirm whether or not
the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet
to be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or… consulted with his superiors.)

It is superfluous to just stick with the complaint I filed November 8 2007 against Sergeant Roy
Steinebach and Inspector Brian Verheul. They have some splainin to do as does Superintendent
Robert Davis that will inevitably lead to their superiors.

I complained of Government corruption and conspiracy and they refused to investigate, and when
Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam investigated the evidence thorough and thoughtful when forming
conclusions based on the relevant evidence, in order to determine which was relevant he had to be
thorough and thoughtful as he stated he was.

That remains to be seen but Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is self- evident he is not.

I reiterate all police have a responsibility to be consistent with the Police Services Act and the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and
benefits and it is each person’s superior that is responsible to see that they are competent
responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual as guaranteed with
particular attention to victims, attentive to any flaws in the system that should be addressed to
prevent such reoccurrences to some other individual.

Police Services Act

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles
4
1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they
serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.
Obviously Inspector Robert Davis has insulted my intelligence and demonstrated his
incompetence for success as either the bad or good guy.

You will see in many of my writings I presumed the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot had
been consulted and it was he who actually is behind the refusal to investigate along with
Minister of Public Safety and so on right up to the DOJ and higher.

5) Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s investigation revealed when I attended the Toronto North Detachment
on October 18 2007 and met with Sergeant Steinbach, it was not to make a new complaint but
rather to provide more documents with respect to the same complaint I had previously made to the
Commercial Crime Section (CCS). I was advised in 2006 that CCS would not be investigating this
complaint and I was provided with the rationale for that decision being informed the Department of
Justice had been consulted prior to responding to me.
As previously stated only the first file I provided to Inspector Peter Goulet dated November 15
2005 made reference to the Canada Business Act issues that Sergeant Michael Thomson
addressed in his report on January 18 2006.

From then on it was all about Government Organized Crime of corruption

and conspiracy and the refusal of the YRP, OPP, RCMP and many
government departments and agencies to deal with the issues which led to
the Ontario Attorney General who advises them all and he is the “guardian
of the public interest” which he refuses to guard.
5a) Sergeant Steinbach declined to take more documents and explained the CCS Intake process to
me.
I printed out the evidence to take down to him because the RCMP web site stated they do not
take evidence by e-mail.
He refused to take the evidence stating he already had it because the evidence I had been
sending via Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address was being kept on file and he
already had a copy of the recording of the ORHT hearing that I provided with the November
15 2005 evidence I gave toInspector Peter Goulet.

5b) He did however tell me that he felt that my complaint was too vague and over reaching
and that it did not meet the CCS Investigational mandate.
He refused to look at the evidence I brought with me and the evidence on the web sites is
not vague at all.
He did not state the evidence was vague and over reaching and the evidence irrefutably
proves his opinion as to the relevancy of Government Organized Crime of corruption and
conspiracy is valueless and I suspect that he is not all that familiar with the file and was
just acting on instructions.

5
 5c). He also told me that there was already a file open regarding my allegations and went on to
explain that it did not necessarily mean that the RCMP was going to investigate the complaint.
(Sergeant Steinbach told me for certain the RCMP was not going to investigate the complaint)

6) Inspector Verheul did not deal with me directly, but he did provide direction to Sergeant
Thomson, my principle contact person, that if material being submitted continues to relate to the
issues already reviewed then nothing further should be done than to place a copy of the
correspondence on the file.
As previously mentioned Inspector Verheul is responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions and when I
brought the matter to his attention prior to filing the complaint he should have looked into it and he has
had plenty of time since as he has been provided all the evidence the same as the rest of the people
whose e-mail addresses are in the AAAAAALIST document published on the original Charter
Democracy Force web site

7) In the course of his investigation Staff Sergeant MacAdam also determined that my initial
complaint involving my investment in Mr. Wilson’s company and the Ontario Rental Housing and
Tenant’s Act dispute was reviewed and that I was advised in writing that the matter was most
appropriately handled through the civil provisions provided for in the noted statute and that no
criminal investigation would be undertaken
I presume reference is being made to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s January 18 2006 e-mail again.
He has to fill in the report somehow. Heaven knows I am not referring to reiterations being particularly
reiterative myself. I am noting the struggle to put something to paper that looks legitimately convincing.

8) When I was not satisfied with that response I wrote back the same day and Sergeant Thomson
wrote his second letter dated February 7th 2006, further explaining that if I suspect criminal
activity, the police service with primary jurisdiction would be responsible for investigating the
allegations and it seems the Ontario Provincial Police had also reviewed my complaint and had
referred me to the York Regional Police as the police services of jurisdiction. It was established
as well that I had met with the YRP previously and was told that the matter was civil and that
they would not be conducting an investigation.
I do not seem to have a copy of that letter in my computer files, perhaps in my 3’ stack of hard copy but
it is irrelative.
The police sent me in circles as to who had the authority whereas the YRP was the original police force
of jurisdiction but they have persistently refused to look into the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy, the same as the OPP and the RCMP whereas they all have been provided
the same evidence.

9) After careful consideration of the details surrounding my complaint, he finds no evidence that
indicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and furthermore he
supports Inspector Verheul’s directives, given the nature of the file and the documentation being
provided.
There you have it, after careful consideration he finds no evidence that indicates that Sergeant
Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and further more he supports Inspector Verheul’s
directives.
Was it he Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that gave the order
not to investigate? Was it an obvious decision for him? Did he need to bother consulting with his
superiors?
That is yet to be determined!!

6
 10) If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by
contacting the CPU at the Ottawa office

Of course I wish to exercise my right!!!

That is what this all about. Right?

I see Inspector Brian Verheul is retired now ( bottom of his 2nd page).
Before Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam finished the investigation he was provided a new job( See his
May 20 2008 interim report) with NCO i/c after his name as Occupational Health and Safety
Services “O” Division/ Return to Work/Medical Discharge Facilitator of Occupational Health and
Safety Services “O” Division

As predictable as the likelihood of people becoming victims with government members of the Law
Societies holding every position of authority in the legal system who are not required to give a damn
about every individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits nor is the Law
Society of Upper Canada required to examine evidence provided in support of complaints against
their members.

See the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document published on the original Charter
Democracy Force web site.

CanLaw National Lawyer Referral Service confirmed this on their web site www.canlaw.com
and I copied other evidence from their site, which they were not too happy about which you will see
published on the Charter Democracy Force web site.

All evidence referred herein is published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and was e-mailed
to everyone on the aforementioned AAAAAALIST and they were provided with the web site addresses
they would be published on.
**********************************************************************************
It is predictable you of the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP will be orchestrated by
the superiors of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as it is apparent they
already caused Andree Leduc to not cooperate with me.

You will find that information on the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site or referenced where
you will find all the evidence stated herein, and quite probably more.

The evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and with the
RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 they are securely implicated in the conspiracy.

Now it is your turn to provide us the irrefutable evidence of the Commission for Public Complaints
Against the RCMP for the public to see which you really have no choice but to cooperate with the
conspiracy or cooperate consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights.

Of course this document will be e-mailed to everyone on the AAAAALIST and many others.

I will expect acknowledgement of receipt of the first page of this document informing you where the rest
of it is published and the other pertinent evidence.
Should you have any problems with the links to the documents or web sites please do not hesitate to
contact me at frank@cdf.name
7
The same if you need any help understanding the evidence or should you require more evidence, anything
at all please do not hesitate to contact me.

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force

PS

You have more than enough to demand a Public Inquiry if you can find someone you can demand.
Perhaps you can find a way to get the information to the media.

You will read throughout the correspondence every government department and agency suggesting I get a
lawyer and deal with my personal issues, as they like to say, in civil court.

The July 26 2008 Saturday Star headlined the serious situation that the Middle Class cannot afford to
access the civil courts costing $60,000 for 3 days and the media who are on the AAAALIST have also
been provided the evidence of precisely what I informed them more than three years ago which they
attempt to orchestrate themselves out of this one.

Invariably everything they do is corrupt and they have no choice but to continue in their ways when they
are confronted but the jig is up.

There is always the option of finally doing things legal consistent with the Constitution conducive to every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
That would require restructuring and come right out and fess the truth something they are not familiar with
so it could be somewhat clumsy.

8
From : Michael Thomson <Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Sent : January 18, 2006 12:51:19 PM
To : <franklyone@hotmail.com>
CC : "Mona Eichmann" <Mona.Eichmann@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Subject : BioSafe Natural Products Inc./ Bio-Safe Natural TechnologiesInc.

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

I have reviewed the documents, forwarded to our office here, that were submitted to our
Newmarket Detachment. You have proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of
the Canada Business Corporations Act,Chapter C-44 (CBCA) and as such, this matter has been taken
by our office for review.

A review of the matter has been completed and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been
consulted in terms of prosecution under the jurisdiction of this Act.
Unfortunately, Part XIX, and Section 229(1) CBCA and thereafter of the Act is quite specific in
the terms of the investigation and enforcement of same. This is entirely a civil procedure that
requires the Court to issue an Investigation Order and thereafter appoint an Inspector. The
Inspector has specific authorization allowing entry and examination of the corporation's books
and records. These duties are outlined in Section 130(1) CBCA. Part XIX.1 outlines the
apportioning of the award of damages, and Part XX outlines remedies, offences and punishment.

Mr. Donald WILSON's assertions that a subpoena and/or a search warrant are required in order to
allow the shareholders to review the companies' books and records are erroneous, as outlined in
Section 21 (1-10) CBCA.

It is the judgment of DOJ and this office that this matter lies solely within the confines of
civil litigational procedures, and as such, DOJ will not consider prosecuting this matter and no
investigation will be undertaken by this office. An attempt has been made to verbally convey this
message via telephone, however the number provided appears to be the number of a fax machine. The
information provided will be kept on file for intelligence/ information purposes only. If you
have any further questions, these may be directed to the Writer at
the numbers listed below.

Yours truly,

M.J. Thomson, Sgt.

NCO i/c Central Intake & Admin. Support.
Greater Toronto Area - Commercial Crime Section,
Milton, Ontario
(905) 876-9656
(905) 876-9757 (Fax)
michael.thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

Sent: September 18, 2008 8:21 AM

9
To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: FW: Request Review of Complaint

September 18, 2008

Andree Leduc

I have not yet received acknowledgement of receipt of the e-mail I sent September 11 2008.
Please respond as to what actions you have taken regarding these most serious issues.

Thank you

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

Sent: September 11, 2008 3:19 PM
To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: Request Review of Complaint

September 11 2008

Commission for Public Complaints Against The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
7337 137 Street, Suite 102
Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4
Fax 604-501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca

Attention Andree Leduc

Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
Frank Gallagher
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316 Manager
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317 Charter Democracy Force

Re: Request Review of Complaint

Dear Andree Leduc

I hope you will be more cooperative than when you last wrote in December 2007 and refused to respond to my
several attempts to have you confirm that you will and make some effort to be competent when this inevitable day
arrived to request a review of my complaint against the RCMP as I am not satisfied with their deliberate
incompetence consistent with the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.

Given the evidence and particular circumstances it would ne naïve of me to believe anything other than you are
under the thumb of the major players of the conspiracy but never the less I must go through the motions following
the modus operandi of the government documenting every step of the way for both present and future use.

.You will notice how FFF, Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith I endeavour to be expecting the same in return and
of course when not, it is painfully obvious and though I would prefer appropriate action from you I have learned to
settle for more evidence as if I didn’t have enough already.

From the tone of my writing it is hoped you will comprehend that what concerns me does concern you one way or
another and all I can do is hope that you understand that I am a victim requesting justice as detailed on the Charter
Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites although in reference to the evidence originally

10
attached to the complaints you will find it on the original Charter Democracy Force site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

There is sufficient evidence there that demands the RCMP look into in the 15 Lawyer Files and the Mad, Glad
mostly Sad….Why document that asks many questions Why that need to be formally answered even though they
answer themselves.

I have made note of some very significant serious problems within the upper command of the RCMP in the
following pages, which includes a copy of their Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008.

I believe considering your admittance of incompetence that this is a case of rare circumstance and at the
discretion of the Chair of the CPC request the CPC become involved and conduct its own investigation in
the public interest or conduct a public interest hearing or both.

Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate

Thank you
Frank Gallagher
September 11 2008

Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC

11
 Golden Rule
“Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself”
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE,
RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY …finally I began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was
filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

Jesus
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Jonathan Swainger
University of British Columbia history professor

Edmund Morgan’s compelling book “Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and
America” opens with an assertion that the success of any form of government requires the acceptance of a number of
fictions. In democracies for example, it is necessary for the population to “believe” that the people have a voice or…
that the representatives of the people are the people”

Frank 1942 AD – 200_

Manager, Charter Democracy Force

When truth of a CONSISTENCY to a thing is the ultimate quest, the thing is self-evident even though supported by
only one statement is self sufficient, impervious to any number of CONSISTENCIES of truths that do not maintain a
CONSISTENCY with the thing .
When all is said and done and such inconsistency remains adverse to the CONSISTENCY of the thing deception and
prevarication is self-evident.
When persons develop prevarication to perfection they invariably deceive themselves making them inane
to any purpose vulnerable to sane purpose of humongous advantage to the Charter Democracy Force
maintaining CONSISTENCY to a thing fair and relevant to all of the moral society of the Constitution of
the democracy of Canada where eradication of amoral inclination is its purpose.

12
The painful obviousness of that which is predictable becomes pathetically more nauseating when proven true.
One charged with a crime can not be judged by the amoral and most definitely not by oneself.

CONSISTENCY to evade the purpose of truth

with irrelevant unfounded truths consistently
reveals the truth whether they are truths or lies
where Reality is the truth impervious to
perception yet precisely due to perception.

When ones mandate is to meet with a person

to pay them back $5 owed and finds them
lying in the street in pain a competent report
on the incident, no matter how thorough to
mandated purpose should include mention of
the victim, how he or she got there, and what
initiatives were taken to secure their safety
and wellbeing and was there any obvious
hazards that could be removed to ensure no
reoccurrence.

Due diligence to a purpose when the safety

and wellbeing of every individual is severely
jeopardized weighs heavy on the ability of an
authority assigned responsibility and the
report is self-evident

13
14
 Priority

Police Services Act

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles

1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they
serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

In which way does a preponderance of paper proliferated with words protect every individual as
guaranteed by the Charter?

Of what purpose are such words and those found in the Constitution if staff is without principles?

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based
on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Incompetence is a relatively simple matter to deal with when competence is the quest by all concerned

Deliberate incompetence is a simpler matter to deal with when incompetence is the quest by all concerned

When there is an obvious CONSISTENCY of incompetence it could very well be the person who
perceives the CONSISTENCY of incompetence to be obvious is personally consistently incompetent.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Considering every individual’s safety and well being is at stake consistent CONSISTENCY of those
people assigned the responsibility to protect every individual equally as guaranteed is mandatory either
stated or implied.
Similarly and most assuredly government personnel financed to administer and enforce the provisions of
the Constitution must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and
conviction meaning they must be aware of their legitimate purpose and the serious ramifications upon
society should the CONSISTENCY not be consistently monitored and maintained.

The consequences of neglect are of the most serious nature to the public interest and most assuredly the
Attorney General of Ontario is the “guardian of the public interest” as the “Roles and Responsibilities of
the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site attests.

15
CONSISTENCY is also prerequisite in the safety and wellbeing of personnel involved in the government
organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.

The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force was collected by me Frank Gallagher who
became lucidly alert on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing to the fact I had been
victimized by my former tenant DON Wilson president of a company I had invested in.

Over a period of three years I presented the irrefutable evidence of the crimes to a preponderance of
prominent government personnel, media and others whose e-mail addresses in the AAAAALIST document
are published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

The CONSISTENCY of their do not give a damn attitude about the Constitution and the individual’s equal
guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the spirit that emanates from the Law Society of Upper Canada
demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document is overwhelming and pathetically
incomprehensible in terms of incompetence and ignorance to legitimate purpose.

So overwhelming that stretches far beyond the realm that such incompetence could be achieved naturally
and already certain there was much more to this than meets the eye turned my efforts to divulge the root of
the problem that led me right back to that which was immediately apparent at the beginning that the office
of the Attorney General of Ontario was behind it all, being advisor to the Minister of Municipal Affairs
and Housing John Gerretsen who was responsible to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act,
1997 but demonstrated an irresponsible indifference to his responsibility.

This is all detailed in the 15 Lawyer Files, which we are all quite familiar with by now. Right?

Well to save me time and everyone else concerned the evidence published on the Charter Democracy
Force irrefutably proves the incompetence of the entire legal system to protect every individual equally as
guaranteed by the Charter but at the same time demonstrates an uncanny CONSISTENCY to protect every
individual involved in the conspiracy from the people adverse to the moral legitimate purpose that they
have the people “believe”

So CONSISTENT and so obvious that any sane person of moral thought and reason can discern the truth
that what we have here in Canada is government organized crime personified.

The RCMP who studied the evidence since I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the
RCMP November 8 2007 not November 7 2007 as suggested in their “Final Letter of Disposition had to
wade through the evidence which was apparently either over their heads or was simply of no concern to
them as they did their Law Society rendition of pathetic injustice oblivious to “The Spirit of the Law” and
the vital role evidence plays.

Well, the RCMP had an opportunity to show their stuff and blew it miserably incompetent to the
conspiracy and most assuredly no semblance at all to what is expected of a competent responsible
irreproachable entity of fortitude and conviction in continuity to support a moral society conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed equal Charter rights.

Such lame excuses to avoid addressing the major issues and even in what amounts to a one full page of
response maintains an inconsistency with actual fact, but then competence to any purpose is not expected
of them from their superiors so what you see is what you get and the public has no choice but to forget it
and move on to retain their sanity.
16
Perhaps all the inconsistencies are deliberately entered to draw ones attention to them and would be of no
avail to argue, petty in nature distracting from the obvious serious issues they obviously never intend to
address.
Perhaps they are intended to infuriate me so I will respond insanely providing them opportunity to divert
the issues to a mental instability.

Well, that does not work absolutely inane to competent responsible irreproachable sane moral purpose.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

The truth cannot change but perceptions are vulnerable and fickle things.
They will allow you to believe you are cunning intelligent above many, provide you confidence and
arrogance…and stuff like that.

Simple fact is it will betray you.

Do not believe?

Have a serious look at the Final Letter of Disposition from the point of view of an individual of the moral
majority who once believed their Charter rights secure and were treated fairly as if in a democracy.

The government organized crime has clearly been proven to be initiated at the top but its success is
dependent on the ignorance and cooperation of the ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE.

As the economy gets worse nature will take its course has history attests and be assured we of the Charter
Democracy Force will humongously increase our efforts to the resolve necessary to prevention of the
predictable unnecessary chaos.

One has to wonder if terrorists is just a word attached to groups who are well aware that sane peaceful
initiatives to fair sane moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason is impossible with greedy imbeciles
devoid of conscience inept to sane moral thought and reason.

It seems to me the manipulative abilities of international corporate conglomerates and the humongous
advantage the affluent and influential have illegitimately over the people of the Lower Tiers the World
Trade Center was a likely target when the people are driven insane by the insanity of it all left unchecked.

Anyway, the people have a right to know what is published on the Charter Democracy Force web site and
with phase one now complete with the irrefutable evidence the upper echelon of the RCMP are involved
we can now direct our efforts full time to spreading the truth and we thank you for that for making it so
vividly clear.

This document “ReceivedSeptember102008” will be published in its appropriate place on the “RCMP
Final Letter of Disposition” web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition

I need not mention how severely disappointed we are at but nothing we had not expected and certainly
nothing we were not prepared for.

17
We will give the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP one more opportunity to
demonstrate their incompetence to serve the people consistent with the Constitution and of course make a
formal request to the RCMP Commissioner to investigate the government organized crime as evidenced on
the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name which Robert Davis, Superintendent, District
Commander, Greater Toronto Area was kind enough to admit as did Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam that
you have possession of the evidence or access of all the evidence on the web sites but have chosen to
ignore it with blinders on and chose to emphasize your sole mandate was to determine whether or not the
members acted appropriately

This is how my first conversation with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam began when he phoned me to see if I
would come down to the Newmarket office to discuss the complaint and now 10 months later the
incompetence remains..

It was about 3 weeks after he began looking into it on a part time basis he informed and at first I agreed to
go down, but when I asked if he had looked at the evidence on the web site he said no, he was just
investing the complaint against the RCMP members.

He had not yet talked to the 2 RCMP members and not looked at the evidence and he wants me to come
down.
I questioned how could he possibly determine if they acted appropriately with out looking at the evidence
and of course the Law Society of Upper Canada is of the belief their member acted appropriately without
looking at the evidence and we see a significant CONSISTENCY throughout that evidence appears to be
irrelevant when members of the Law Societies are involved as the Attorney General who plays a major
role advising all government departments and agencies.

I told him he would first have to determine if the evidence was valid to the complaint or considered trivial,
frivolous or vexatious which I cited from the Complaints Commission brochure.

You state Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is a veteran investigator which hardly supports your intended
purpose when logically in the peoples minds evidence plays a major role in investigations and if your
veteran investigators are not aware the public are in serious trouble.

OOPS: They are in serious trouble aren’t they?

All that has been noted is the pathetic incompetence of the person assigned to the investigation and for that
he gets a promotion and I can expand that to see how you made it to District Commander.

There can be no doubt you are aware of the conspiracy because you would have to be an imbecile not to
understand what is going on if you are familiar with the evidence.

Of course that has crossed my mind in earlier writings that for the government organized crime to be
successful persons in you positions have to be selected from the incompetent or cooperative to the
conspiracy permitting its persistent existence.

You have made reference to issues being discussed with the DOJ, which is absurd as the evidence clearly
shows the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada are major players in the
conspiracy.

18
I know it appears that I am addressing these issues to you in an effort to make you people understand the
error of your ways but we know you are well aware, however it is imperative the public clearly
understands and it is to that endeavour I am most attentive.

I presume your efforts are addressed similarly and I have to inform you the intended recipients of this
information are hardly as dumb as they would have to be to comprehend any reason for you not to act on
their behalf consistent with the Constitituion.

Meanwhile I am requesting every recipient to jump in and act appropriately on behalf of the people in
legitimate support of the sanctity of the Canadian Constitution.

The inane dribble you offered as a competent responsible irreproachable response may well be what you
believe but as always evidence begets the truth and you people simply must familiarize yourselves with the
concept.

You state Sergeant Steinbach told me what my complaint was too vague which is utter nonsense but I
know after 10 months study of the evidence that is so overwhelming with nothing left to debate and out of
hundreds of pages of evidence you had to at least fill one page with something and why not utter crap that
comes so readily.

Given the most serious nature of the issues it is incomprehensible to suggest every (i) should be dotted and
(t) s crossed where if you were the competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and
conviction to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights you would have laid out the red carpet and
thanked me for all the investigative work I did to help you better serve the public interest and Attorney
General Chris Bentley “guardian of the public interest” should have been pleased if not for the fact he is
the major player along with the DOJ.

You mentioned I was provided with the rationale back in 2006, January as I recall and that was an entirely
different matter when after the York Regional Police demonstrated their incompetence to deal with the
issues as well as many other government personnel I thought I would try in addition to address the matter
under the Corporations Act….whatever they call it further demonstrating Don Wilson’s character but
Sergeant Thomson pulled one of your tricks emphasizing that he was addressing the issues that I had
presented back in November 2005 I believe it was, maybe early December under the auspices of the
Corporations Act …whatever but since then I have provided the RCMP a preponderance of irrefutable
evidence of government organized crime if you care to stay to pertinent point, and it was delivered by e-
mail via the Michael Thomson e-mail address and Sergeant Roy Steinbach acknowledged they had the
evidence on file including a disk recording of the Tribunal hearing.

That is why he refused to accept the evidence I brought down because he stated they already had it.

Everything I am stating now is just reiterating the prodigious amount of reiterations published on the web
sites and all you have demonstrated is your incoherence to the evidence and your irresponsible attitude
towards the necessity of a responsible investigation on behalf of the people.

I have no further interest in addressing the crapola contained with your Final Letter of Disposition
when the evidence published on the web sites bares the truth and your report bares the truth of the
incompetent and irresponsible ineptness of the RCMP to protect the people as guaranteed by the Charter
when you make every effort to avoid the truth that lies within the evidence you stumbled over looking for
something to put in your one page letter of content.

19
Well the evidence stands for itself, not debateable and yet fools rush in to give it a try.

Gee, that segues me to the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP who were kind enough to
explain their incompetence and were determined not to get any wiser, no matter how hard I tried.

I informed them this day would come and if they had of started getting prepared back in December 2007
they would be competently prepared so now we get to see the results.

Why would they want the public to know they are incompetent?

Don’t answer, we know don’t we?

They really are cooperative with the conspiracy but they were hired specifically for their incompetence.

Anyway I leave you all to ponder your decisions while we test the Complaints Commission.

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force

PS

I did make mention I am not satisfied with your incompetent irresponsible trivial, frivolous vexatious Final
Letter of Disposition didn’t I?

I suppose the obvious does not require the formality.

If I seem a little frustrated and perhaps a bit irate perhaps if we looked at the evidence we could determine
the cause and help me out.

OOPS, silly me, I keep forgetting you are not required to give a damn but when the opportunity arises
make a kind gesture.

One more time I state unless the evidence that had been provided to the RCMP up until October 18 2007
has been thoroughly examined as to its validity of the charges of government organized crime of
corruption and conspiracy the RCMP have demonstrated their incompetence to protect the public interest.

Obviously the District Commander provides a good example of the incompetence that must ran rampant
throughout the force.

We cannot have that can we?

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28