2010-07-25 Fine V Baca (09-A827) at The Supreme Court of The United States - Records of Denial of The Application

Digitally signed
by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2010.07.25
16:57:49 +03'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
10-07-25 Fine v Baca (09-A827) – Records of the US Supreme Court
The following Court records are attached herein:

1) Online public access system of the Court: Opening page for dockets search
2) Online public access system of the Court: Docket in Fine v Baca (09-A827)
3) Online public access system of the Court: Log - 2009 Term Court Orders
4) Online public access system of the Court: Order List - Monday, April 26, 2010.
5) Paper Court file of the Court: March 1, 2010 Application – face page, as copied on March 22, 2010.
6) Paper Court file of the Court: March 12, 2010 letter by Counsel Bickell, as copied on March 22, 2010.
Review of the records, listed above, raised the following concerns:

1) Regarding online Docket entry noting a March 12, 2010 Denial of the Application by Justice Kennedy:
a) Local Rules of the Court, Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices, states:
4. A Justice denying an application will note the denial thereon.
However, the face page of the Application, copied on March 22, 2010 failed to show any note of
the March 12, 2010 denial on the Application.
b) Local Rules of the Court, Rule 1. Clerk, states:
2. The Clerk maintains the Court’s records and will not permit any of them to
be removed from the Court building except as authorized by the Court. Any
document filed with the Clerk and made a part of the Court’s records may not
thereafter be withdrawn from the official Court files.
However, the March 12, 2010 Counsel Bickell letter was never stamped “FILED” by the Clerk.
c) Local Rules of the Court, Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices, states:
6. The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy
means, of the disposition made of an application.
However, the March 12, 2010 letter was neither by the Clerk nor by an authorized Deputy Clerk,
but by Counsel. Moreover, the letter remained unsigned.
d) Log of 2009 Term Orders failed to list the March 12, 2010 denial by Justice Kenney.
2) Regarding Docket entry noting a April 26, 2010 denial of the Application by the Court:
a) Media reported that the Court in fact decided not to review the Application, rather than deny it.
b) Order List for April 26, 2010 listed denial by the Court.
Therefore, the records as a whole were deemed vague and ambiguous.

On July 25, 2010 request was submitted to the Clerk of the Court William Suter by Human Rights Alert
(NGO) - to certify the online docket, and provide copy of the docket in the Court’s own case
management system in the case.
7/25/2010 Untitled Document
Docket
The automated docket system is the Court's case tracking system. It contains information about cases, both pending and
decided. The docket provided on this page contains information regarding the status of cases for both the current Term and
the prior Term. The Court's Term begins on the first Monday in October and ends on the preceding day the next year. The
October Term 2008 begins on October 6, 2008. Information on the docket is updated on the day after an entry is made on
the docket.
Users can search for cases by using a Supreme Court docket number, a lower court docket number, or a case name. The
format for Supreme Court docket numbers is "Term year-number" (e.g., 06-123; 07-12; 06-5001.). Word searches can also
be accomplished.
Questions Presented. Internet users can review the Questions Presented in granted and noted cases simply by clicking on
the hyperlink located within the Docket's case summary information for a particular case. For example, when a user
accesses the docket information for case number 07-330, a hyperlink will appear just beneath the decision date within the
case summary information. Once the hyperlink is clicked, the user will be linked to a .pdf file setting forth the Question(s)
Presented in the case.
Search for: Search
Recent Filings in Original Nos. 1, 2 & 3
Case Distribution Schedule
Delivery of Documents to the Clerk's Office
On-Line MERITS BRIEFS
Special Master Reports
1/1
No. 09A827
Title: Richard I. Fine, Applicant
v.
Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-56073)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mar 1 2010 Application (09A827) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Mar 12 2010 Application (09A827) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Mar 30 2010 Application (09A827) refiled and submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Apr 7 2010 Application (09A827) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 23, 2010.
Apr 7 2010 Application (09A827) referred to the Court.
Apr 26 2010 Application (09A827) denied by the Court.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~

Attorneys for Petitioner:
Richard I. Fine 1824367
Men's Central Jail
441 Bauchet Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Party name: Richard I. Fine
Attorneys for Respondents:
(818)-545-
Paul B. Beach Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi PC
1925
100 West Broadway Suite 1200
Glendale, CA 91210
Party name: Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California, et al.
1/1
2009 Term Court Orders
The vast majority of cases filed in the Supreme Court are disposed of summarily by unsigned orders. Such an order
will, for example, deny a petition for certiorari without comment. Regularly scheduled lists of orders are issued on
each Monday that the Court sits, but "miscellaneous" orders may be issued in individual cases at any time.
Scheduled order lists are posted on this Website on the day of their issuance, while miscellaneous orders are
posted on the day of issuance or the next day.
Caution: These electronic orders may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official printed
versions. Moreover, all order lists and miscellaneous orders are replaced within a few months by paginated versions
of them in a preliminary print of the United States Reports, and one year after the issuance of the preliminary print by
the final version of the orders in a U. S. Reports bound volume. In case of discrepancies between the print and
electronic versions of orders, the print version controls. In case of discrepancies between order lists or
miscellaneous orders and any later official version of them, the later version controls.
07/22/10 Miscellaneous Order

06/28/10 Order List
06/21/10 Order List
06/14/10 Order List
06/07/10 Order List
06/01/10 Order List
1/3
05/24/10 Order List
05/17/10 Order List
05/03/10 Order List
04/28/10 Rules of Appellate Procedure
04/28/10 Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
04/28/10 Rules of Civil Procedure
04/28/10 Rules of Criminal Procedure
04/28/10 Rules of Evidence
04/26/10 Order List
04/19/10 Order List
04/05/10 Order List
03/29/10 Order List
03/22/10 Order List
03/08/10 Order List
03/01/10 Order List
02/22/10 Order List
2/3
01/25/10 Order List
01/19/10 Order List
01/11/10 Order List
12/14/09 Order List
12/07/09 Order List
11/30/09 Order List
11/16/09 Order List
11/09/09 Order List
11/02/09 Order List
10/20/09 Order List
10/13/09 Order List
10/05/09 Order List
3/3
(ORDER LIST: 559 U.S.)
MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2010
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
09-724 REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA, INC. V. FEC, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The
judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further
consideration in light of Citizens United v. Federal Election
Comm’n, 558 U.S. ___ (2010), and the Solicitor General's
suggestion of mootness.
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
09A827 FINE, RICHARD I. V. BACA, SHERIFF, ET AL.

(09-1250)
The application for stay addressed to Justice Ginsburg
and referred to the Court is denied.
09M86 DOSTER, OSCAR R. V. TEXAS
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner
is granted.
09M87 TULL, ROSALINDA V. NEW YORK, NY, ET AL.
09M88 DOBY, ROBERT T. V. BURTT, WARDEN
The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions
for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.
1, ORIG. ) WISCONSIN, ET AL. V. ILLINOIS, ET AL.

)
2, ORIG. ) MICHIGAN V. ILLINOIS, ET AL.
)
)
3, ORIG. ) NEW YORK V. ILLINOIS, ET AL.
The motion of Michigan to reopen and for a supplemental
decree is denied. The alternative motion for leave to file a
bill of complaint is denied.
09-960 HOGAN, WILLIAM H., ET AL. V. KALTAG TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in
this case expressing the views of the United States.
09-9137 CALDWELL, KEITH R. V. UNITED STATES TAX COURT, ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order
denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
09-9281 SHAHIN, NINA V. DELAWARE, ET AL.
09-9283 RUBINSTEIN, ERAN, ET UX. V. HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis are denied. Petitioners are allowed until May 17,
2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule
38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of
the Rules of this Court.
CERTIORARI GRANTED
09-737 ORTIZ, MICHELLE V. JORDAN, PAULA, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
08-1448 SCHWARZENEGGER, GOV. OF CA V. ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS, ET AL.
The motion of California State Senator Leland Y. Yee, et al.
for leave to file a brief as amici curiae out of time is denied.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
CERTIORARI DENIED
08-10994 JEFFERS, KEITH R. V. WEST VIRGINIA
09-753 McGOWAN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
09-938 OGLE, D. CLARK V. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MD
09-968 CAFFEY, SHERRYL S. V. ALABAMA STATE BAR
09-997 DICKSON, AL, ET AL. V. SAN JUAN COUNTY, UT, ET AL.
09-1005 PUGLISI, LINDA, ET AL. V. PAVONE, ROBERT L., ET AL.
09-1010 COLLARD, BOBBY L. V. TEXAS
09-1032 TELECHECK SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. BEAUDRY, CHERYL
09-1037 WILSON, PATRICIA A. V. ROBERTS J. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES
09-1041 SKENDAJ, ARBEN V. HOLDER, ATT'Y GEN.
09-1046 HOOVER, COREY V. OHIO
09-1060 THANEDAR, CHANDRASHEKHAR B. V. TIME WARNER, INC., ET AL.
09-1083 HAWKINS, ELMER A. V. SHINSEKI, SEC. OF VA
09-1087 DAVID, WILLIS W. V. DAVID, JACQUELINE M.
09-1089 ALLIED HOME MORTGAGE, ET AL. V. CORRALES, LARRY
09-1135 KRIEG, HAROLD B. V. DAWSON, JUDGE, USDC NV, ET AL.
09-1136 MAGDALIN, WILLIAM V. CIR
09-1152 BRANDT, WILLIAM V. B.A. CAPITAL CO., ET AL.
09-5901 HARRISON, WILLIAM H. V. LINDSAY, WARDEN
09-7636 ORTIZ-COCA, EMILIO A. V. UNITED STATES
09-7639 AGUILAR-MENDEZ, BENITO V. UNITED STATES
09-7643 GARCIA-QUIROZ, OSCAR V. UNITED STATES
09-7644 MANCILLA-LOPEZ, CIRILO V. UNITED STATES
09-7698 FOWLER, MARK V. UNITED STATES
09-7829 BRADSHAW, VANCE V. UNITED STATES
09-7923 SCHWARTZ, STEVEN A. V. UNITED STATES
09-8090 KINCANNON, JAMES T. V. UNITED STATES
09-8653 SYLVIA, RONNIE V. MADDOX, TOMMY, ET AL.
09-8673 BEARUP, PATRICK W. V. ARIZONA
09-8754 KATES, DAVID E. V. UNITED STATES
09-8887 WILL, PAUL V. CAIN, WARDEN
09-8900 CARRINGTON, CELESTE S. V. CALIFORNIA
09-8909 TEMPLE, CHRISTOPHER L. V. WARMER, WARDEN
09-9136 SHIRLEY, DAVID I. V. INDIANA
09-9145 SHOVE, THEODORE V. WONG, WARDEN
09-9149 REID, KEITH V. FLINT CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
09-9152 SONG, YOUNG B. V. DOZIER, STEVE
09-9163 SHIELD, RYAN B. V. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ
09-9173 LANDEROS, FRANCISCO V. CALIFORNIA
09-9176 USHER, JOHNNY O. V. GEORGIA
09-9179 SPUCK, DANIEL L. V. RIDGE, FORMER GOV. OF PA, ET AL.
09-9184 STANKOWSKI, DONALD V. ABRAMSON, JERRY E., ET AL.
09-9192 SMITH, MICHAEL L. V. YATES, WARDEN, ET AL.
09-9193 SWAIN, SEAN V. WELCH, WARDEN
09-9194 ROWELL, LAMARR V. NEVADA
09-9195 RODRIGUEZ, ALEX V. WALKER, WARDEN
09-9206 BROWN, TROY A. V. JOHNSON, DIR., VA DOC
09-9215 COLLADO, MANUEL A. V. CALIFORNIA
09-9220 BARBOUR, KENNETH E. V. SCHLOBOHM, LT., ET AL.
09-9222 BROWDER, JOE A. V. VINGLEMAN, DARYLE, ET AL.
09-9226 POWERS, THOMAS V. ILLINOIS
09-9227 OSTOPOSIDES, SOCRATES V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CA, ET AL.
09-9229 WOOD, MICHAEL L. V. TEXAS
09-9230 GRANDOIT, GERARD D. V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
09-9233 GONZALEZ, LUIS, ET AL. V. RIDDLE, LYNNE, ET AL.
09-9235 WOODSON, ROY L. V. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ
09-9239 MAYS, JAMES A. V. PHELPS, WARDEN, ET AL.
09-9245 McGORE, DARRYL V. LUTZ, OFFICER, ET AL.
09-9265 KASTNER, KRISTOPHER T. V. TEXAS, ET AL.
09-9274 BARGHOUT, EIAD V. ILLINOIS
09-9285 SLAMA, ANTHONY D. V. CALIFORNIA
09-9287 ROBINSON, TYRONE L. V. COHEN, WARDEN, ET AL.
09-9290 WEBBER, LEROY V. FLORIDA
09-9293 MANNIX, SHEILA A. V. MADIGAN, LISA, ET AL.
09-9294 KRUEGER, KENT A. V. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ
09-9296 TURNER, GARRY V. ILLINOIS
09-9298 WADDELL-EL, ALTON V. VIRGINIA
09-9299 WILLINGHAM, NATHAN V. BD. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
09-9307 BEVINS, ANDREW V. OHIO
09-9309 BROWN, JEROME J. V. STATE CAPITOL OFFICE, ET AL.
09-9313 RUSSELL, ISAAC D. V. KENNEDY, TERI, ET AL.
09-9316 DiMARIA, JAMES V. ARTUS, SUPT., CLINTON
09-9326 NORTHON, LIYSA V. RULE, ANN, ET AL.
09-9331 SMITH, CARLVOSIER V. ILLINOIS
09-9353 THREATT, ANTHONY V. BIRKETT, WARDEN
09-9383 BRANT, LINWOOD V. VARANO, DAVID, ET AL.
09-9397 FLEWELLEN, MARQUISE L. V. WALLER, WARDEN, ET AL.
09-9404 MANGUM, SANDRA V. CATO CORPORATION
09-9412 WESCOTT, LAMARIS V. DELAWARE
09-9416 HAYWARD, STEVEN D. V. FLORIDA
09-9437 QUINN, SAMUEL V. ILLINOIS
09-9445 COOPER, RONALD V. MI DOC, ET AL.
09-9471 FOSTER, DAVID V. OHIO
09-9484 BROWN, JEROME J. V. McCARTHY, BRENNAN C.
09-9517 PAYNE, PAUL V. LeMASTER, WARDEN, ET AL.
09-9530 CHAMBERS, GREGORY V. OHIO
09-9535 PATTERSON, WAYMAN V. McQUIGGIN, WARDEN
09-9542 KING, ROBERT J. V. COLMER, JOHN, ET AL.
09-9555 MENTOR, RAYMOND V. NY DIV. OF PAROLE, ET AL.
09-9575 SIMMONS, ANTONIO V. THURMER, WARDEN
09-9587 JOHNSON, RONALD D. V. FLORIDA
09-9594 CASTRO, ISMAEL V. McNEIL, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.
09-9600 DAVIS, MICKEY L. V. MICHIGAN
09-9616 AGUILAR, TERESA V. SELMAN BREITZMAN, LLP, ET AL.
09-9620 AMR, SALAME M. V. VA STATE UNIV., ET AL.
09-9622 MILLER, JENNIFER L. V. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.
09-9636 WALLER, AHMAD V. HAUCK, WARDEN, ET AL.
09-9639 YOUNG, EDWARD E. V. RHODE ISLAND, ET AL.
09-9653 WARDLOW, JOHNNIE V. UNITED STATES
09-9660 SMILEY, CURTIS V. UNITED STATES
09-9691 BAUER, ADAM M. V. MICHIGAN
09-9723 RODRIGUEZ-MENA, JOSE L. V. UNITED STATES
09-9726 SMALL, CLARENCE V. BODISON, WARDEN
09-9741 LEE, KEVIN R. V. WISCONSIN
09-9771 DAVIS, ORAN T. V. UNITED STATES
09-9789 SMITH, KEVIN V. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, ET AL.
09-9796 CONNOLLY, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
09-9799 IRONS, FREDERICK L. V. UNITED STATES
09-9801 GARCIA, YURI V. UNITED STATES
09-9805 HARDEMAN, BRODERICK D. V. UNITED STATES
09-9806 GUZMAN, ALVIS V. UNITED STATES
09-9807 HARRIS, DAVID W. V. UNITED STATES
09-9809 GONZALES, ADAN V. UNITED STATES
09-9810 HUBER, JAMES V. UNITED STATES
09-9811 HORDGE, HENRY V. UNITED STATES
09-9812 GRIFFIN, WILLIE J. V. UNITED STATES
09-9814 CARLTON, MICHAEL P. V. UNITED STATES
09-9815 SUTTON, RAY H. V. UNITED STATES
09-9816 SEGURA-LOPEZ, JUAN D. V. UNITED STATES
09-9817 JIMENEZ-PEREZ, ALEJANDRO V. UNITED STATES
09-9818 HENAO-MELO, ARMANDO V. UNITED STATES
09-9823 THOMAS, ANTHONY A. V. UNITED STATES
09-9824 TORRES, ASTOLFO V. UNITED STATES
09-9825 LOPEZ, JORGE H. V. UNITED STATES
09-9826 LEE, SHAWNTRAIL J. V. UNITED STATES
09-9833 AVILA-RIVERA, SALVADOR V. UNITED STATES
09-9836 ORTIZ-ALVEAR, JUAN M. V. U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ET AL.
09-9840 DUMONT, FRANK J. V. UNITED STATES
09-9843 TSOSIE, LYDIA V. ARIZONA, ET AL.
09-9844 UPSHAW, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
09-9847 WATSON, BILL V. UNITED STATES
09-9848 NYAMAHARO, RANSOM V. UNITED STATES
09-9851 JENNINGS, KEITH V. UNITED STATES
09-9857 MOJICA, JOSHUA V. UNITED STATES
09-9858 RIVERA, ELVIS V. UNITED STATES
09-9866 CABRERA, MIGUEL V. UNITED STATES
09-9872 KING, JERMAINE V. UNITED STATES
09-9879 TRUONG, TIMOTHY V. UNITED STATES
09-9886 SOTO-MUNOZ, JUAN V. UNITED STATES
09-9895 RIVERS, VIRGIL V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
09-999 MALLERY, CLIFTON, ET AL. V. NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice
Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this
petition.
09-1007 MOUNTAIN AMERICA, LLC, ET AL. V. HUFFMAN, DONNA, ET AL.
The motion of West Virginia Manufacturers Association for
leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition
for a writ of certiorari is denied.
09-1016 SIMONELLI, ANTONIO C. V. UNIVERSITY OF CA, ET AL.
Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this
petition.
09-1054 BERGER, HOWARD B. V. SEC
petition.
09-9196 SABEDRA, RICKEY V. USCA 5
09-9266 ODOM, CHRISTOPHER A. V. MT. PLEASANT MUNICIPAL COURT
09-9280 SABEDRA, RICKEY V. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ
09-9342 CALDWELL, CRAIG V. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari
are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
09-9429 McNAMARA, MAUREEN V. KAY, CHIEF JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.
09-9712 ) COOPER, CONRAD V. UNITED STATES

)
09-9880 ) THOMAS, ENRICO V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice
Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of these
petitions.
09-9780 GENEVIER, PIERRE V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CA, ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari
is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly
abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept
any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner
unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the
petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin
v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per
curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases
cited therein.
09-9856 DEANDRADE, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES
petition.
09-9873 FRAZIER, PHELIX H. V. UNITED STATES
pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari
is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
09-1078 IN RE SUSAN ROSE
09-9255 IN RE JEROME HENDERSON
09-10019 IN RE KIM McMULLEN
09-10039 IN RE JIMMIE O. BRUNER
The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
09-10031 IN RE ELLYN J. BURNES
pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas
corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
MANDAMUS DENIED
09-8701 IN RE LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
09-9277 IN RE JEFFREY SANDERS
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
09-9174 IN RE HUBERT WARREN
pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus
is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
REHEARINGS DENIED
09-722 GREEN, HAROLD V. CLEARY WATER AND FIRE DISTRICT
09-768 STRALEY, ROBERT D. V. UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS, ET AL.
09-7887 McDUFFIE, TAVARES A. V. FLORIDA
09-7891 SCOTT, WANDA R. V. SOUTH CAROLINA
09-8139 GREER, BRUCE M. V. NELSON, WARDEN
09-8303 WOODSON, CARLOS L. V. RUNDLE-FERNANDEZ, KATHERINE
09-8304 TOMPSON, JUDITH V. SALEM, NH
09-8391 SAMPSON, JACOB V. FRANCE, ANDREA, ET AL.
09-8463 WHITE, JESSE, ET UX. V. MORT. ELEC. REG. SYS., INC.
09-8464 IN RE MITCHELL L. WALCK
09-8487 HOLLAND, WELLS V. HOLLAND, RENEE
09-8969 PISKANIN, MICHAEL J. V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for rehearing are denied.
10
Suprema Coun. u.s.

Flleo
MAR - I 2010
09fl~.27
Case No. 09- 0i'FI0E OF THe OI..ERK
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
RICHARD 1. FINE,
Petitioner,
v.
SHERIfF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
Respondent.
On Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus

to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF

SENTENCE OF "COERCIVE CONFINEMENT"
RICHARD 1. FINE
In Pro Per
Prisoner ill 1824367
c/o Men's Central Jail
441 Bauchet Street
(310) 638-2825 (messages)
(jJ
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
William K. Sutf:lI'
Clerk of the Court
(202) 479-3011
March 12, 2010
Mr. Richard L Fine

Prisoner ID 1824367
Men's Central Jail
441 Bauchet Street
Re: Richard 1. Fine

v. Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California, et al.
Application No. 09A827
Dear Mr. Fine:
The application for a stay in the above-entitled case has been

presented to Justice Kennedy, who on March 12, 2010, denied the
application.
This letter has been sent to those designated on the attached

notification list.
Sincerely,
William K. Suter, Clerk
hy
Danny Bickell
Staff Attorney
f]

2010-07-25 Fine V Baca (09-A827) at The Supreme Court of The United States - Records of Denial of The Application

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

2010-07-25 Fine V Baca (09-A827) at The Supreme Court of The United States - Records of Denial of The Application

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Digitally signed

10-07-25 Fine v Baca (09-A827) – Records of the US Supreme Court

The following Court records are attached herein:

Review of the records, listed above, raised the following concerns:

Therefore, the records as a whole were deemed vague and ambiguous.

Search for: Search

Recent Filings in Original Nos. 1, 2 & 3

Case Distribution Schedule

Delivery of Documents to the Clerk's Office

On-Line MERITS BRIEFS

Special Master Reports

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~

2009 Term Court Orders

07/22/10 Miscellaneous Order

MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2010

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

09-724 REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA, INC. V. FEC, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The

judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Citizens United v. Federal Election

Comm’n, 558 U.S. ___ (2010), and the Solicitor General's

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

09A827 FINE, RICHARD I. V. BACA, SHERIFF, ET AL.

and referred to the Court is denied.

09M86 DOSTER, OSCAR R. V. TEXAS

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner

09M87 TULL, ROSALINDA V. NEW YORK, NY, ET AL.

09M88 DOBY, ROBERT T. V. BURTT, WARDEN

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions

for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.

1, ORIG. ) WISCONSIN, ET AL. V. ILLINOIS, ET AL.

The motion of Michigan to reopen and for a supplemental

decree is denied. The alternative motion for leave to file a

bill of complaint is denied.

09-960 HOGAN, WILLIAM H., ET AL. V. KALTAG TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in

this case expressing the views of the United States.

09-9137 CALDWELL, KEITH R. V. UNITED STATES TAX COURT, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order

denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

09-9281 SHAHIN, NINA V. DELAWARE, ET AL.

09-9283 RUBINSTEIN, ERAN, ET UX. V. HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis are denied. Petitioners are allowed until May 17,

2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule

38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of

the Rules of this Court.

09-737 ORTIZ, MICHELLE V. JORDAN, PAULA, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

08-1448 SCHWARZENEGGER, GOV. OF CA V. ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS, ET AL.

The motion of California State Senator Leland Y. Yee, et al.

for leave to file a brief as amici curiae out of time is denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

08-10994 JEFFERS, KEITH R. V. WEST VIRGINIA

09-753 McGOWAN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES

09-938 OGLE, D. CLARK V. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MD

09-968 CAFFEY, SHERRYL S. V. ALABAMA STATE BAR

09-997 DICKSON, AL, ET AL. V. SAN JUAN COUNTY, UT, ET AL.

09-1005 PUGLISI, LINDA, ET AL. V. PAVONE, ROBERT L., ET AL.

09-1010 COLLARD, BOBBY L. V. TEXAS

~Date~ ~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~ Phone~