Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
is a highly
inefficient organisation. Do you agree? Substantiate and
suggest
reforms. (200 Words)
FCI was established to provide price support to farmers, distribute food grains,
provide storage facilities to ensure food security and price stability.
FCI, an inefficient Organization?
Arguments for
1. Increased food grains procurement prices.
2. Rotting of grains in unscientific FCI godowns.
3. Failure in procurement since large number of farmers uncovered.
4. Leakages in distribution system.
Against
1. Procurement prices are divided into Acquisition, responsibility of Central
and
State Governments and account for 80% of the prices and Distributive prices
(20%)
under FCI control. These distributive
prices have fallen due to the FCIs efforts.
2. State Governments increase MSPs to gain votes and these extra grains are
channelized to FCI. Moreover the decision of quantity to be stored and sold is of
the
State and Central Government.
3. FCI via PPP has constructed scientific godowns reducing the crop damage.
4. Departmental labour salaries have a huge drag on finances. The Central
Government has to solve this problem.
The FCI has shown a lot of improvement so tagging it inefficient would be
incorrect.
Reforms needed to streamline the Organization -
1. More autonomy to sell crops above the buffer stock and to refuse collection
above
these stocks.
2. PDS tracking should be computerized.
3. GPS tracking of vehicles transporting food grains.
4. More scientific godowns on PPP lines.
5. Labour reforms.
6. States well equipped to run their own PDS should be allowed and FCI should
focus
on States in East and NE.
Concerted efforts by the Government, its agencies and the private players would
be
needed to
provide food security to India which will make Indian agriculture a lucrative
market
6Q. A task force on agriculture, set up by the National
Institution for
Transforming India Aayog or NITI Aayog, has suggested a
number of
measures intended to raise agricultural productivity and make
farming
lucrative. What are these suggestions? Critically comment on
them. (200
Words)
The task force on agriculture set up by the NITI Aayog has suggested the
following to reform the agriculture
1.Careful use of GM technology to produce varieties of pulses and oil seeds.
2.Replacing MSP mechanism with a deficiency payment system.
3.Easy land leasing to allow farmer with non viable land holdings to exit the
farming
sector and consolidating these non viable land holdings to make them viable.
4.Encouraging ' contract farming'.
5.Adopting a cooperative model for fruits and vegetables similar to that adopted
in
case of milk.
6.Deregulating the urea subsidies and providing direct subsidies to the farmers.
7.Enabling farmers to frequently upgrade their seeds.
8.Judicious use of Essential Commodities Act so that investment in storage
facilities
is not deterred.
9.Making food processing industry a major export industry.
10.Encouraging agriculture research with the help of private investment.
However-
1.Reservations about the GM technology still exist and their impact on ecology
has
still not been fully brought out.
2.Deficiency Payment system may act as a disincentive for farmers to work hard
and
its impact on tribals and casual labourers will be limited.
3.Providing cash subsidies to the farmers will not be viable unless each one of
them
has a bank account.
4.Leasing land from small farmers without proper rehabilitation will make his
survival difficult as agriculture is a livelihood issue in India.
5.Contract farming may lead to exploitation of the illiterate farmers if the
contracts
are made to the disadvantage of farmers.