V.

Quasi-Judicial Powers

A. In General
Santiago vs. Bautista, 32 SCRA 188 (1970)
Lupangco vs CA, 160 SCRA 848 (1988)
Saado vs Court of Appeals, 356 SCRA 456 (2001)
.CIR vs CA, 261 SCRA 236 (1996) Bellosillo and Hermosisima

B. Incidental Powers
Sec. 13, Book VII, EO 292

Evangelista vs. Jarencio, 69 SCRA 99 (1975)

Salazar vs Achacoso, 183 SCRA 145 (1990)
Public Hearing Committee vs SM Prime Holdings, 631 SCRA 73
(2010)

C. Administrative Procedure in Adjudication of Cases

Sec. 16, Art. III, 1987 Constitution
Secs. 10-16, Book VII, EO 292
Secs. 66-70, Book IV, EO 292

1. Due Process
Art. 704, Civil Code
Secs. 50-51, Book V, EO 292

Ang Tibay vs. CIR, 69 Phil. 635 (1950)

UP Board of Regents vs. CA, 313 SCRA 404 (1999)
.Acuzar vs. Jorolan, G.R. No. 177878 (2010)
Ganappao vs. CSC, 649 SCRA 594 (2011)
.Nacion vs. COA, GR No. 204757 (2015)
.Lumiqued vs. Exenea G.R. No. 117565 (1997)
Office of the Ombudsman vs. Reyes, GR No. 170512 (2011)
Pollution Adjudication Board vs. CA, 195 SCRA 112 (1991(
American Tobacco vs. Director of Patents, 67 SCRA 287 (1975)
DOH vs. Camposano, supra
.Solid Homes vs Laserna, GR No. 166051 (2008)

2. Judgment
Realty Exchange Venture Corp vs. Sendino, 233 SCRA 665 (1994)
Marcelo vs. Bungubung, GR No. 175201 (2008)
Santos-Concio vs. DOJ, GR No. 175057 (2008)

3. Administrative Appeal and Review

Rivera vs. CSC, 240 SCRA 43 (1995)
.Solid Homes, supra
Angeles vs. Gaite, supra

VI. Judicial Review of Administrative Action

A. Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction or Preliminary/ Prior Resort
 Smart Communications, supra
Republic vs. Lacap, 517 SCRA 255 (2007)
Pimentel vs. Senate Committee, GR. No. 187714 (2011)

B. Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

Paat vs. CA, 266 SCRA 167 (1997)
Obiasca vs. Basalotte, 613 SCRA 110 (2010)
Nazareno vs. CA, 267 SCRA 589 (1996)
Pascual vs. Provincial Board, 106 Phil. 466 (1959)
Maglalang vs. PAGCOR, GR. NO. 190566 (2013)
Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC GR. No. 205728 (2015)
DComp vs Eriquez, supra

C. Question of Law and Question of Fat

Santos vs. Committee on Claims Settlement, GR. No. 1578071 (2009

D. Modes of Judicial Review

Reyna vs. COA, GR. No. 157219 (2011)
Remolona vs. CSC, GR. No. 137473 (2001)
Ombudsman vs. Reyes, supra

1. Appeals from Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of Appeals

(Rule 43)
2. Appeal by Certiorari to the Supreme Court (Rule 45)
3. Preliminary Attachment, Preliminary Injuction, Preliminary
Mandatory Injuction, Receivership, Replevin (Rules 57-60)
4. Declaratory Relief (Rule 63)
Hypermix, supra
5. Review of Judgments and Final Orders/ Resolutions of COMELEC
and COA (Rule 64)
6. Petition for Certiorari (Rule 65)
7. Petition for Prohibition (Rule 65)
8. Petition for Mandamus (Rule 65)
MMDA vs Concerned Resdents of Manila Bay, GR. Nos. 171947-48
(2008)
9. Writ of Habeas Corpus (Rule 102)
Lucien Tran Van Nghia vs. Liwag, 175 SCRA 318 (1989)
10. Writ of Amparo
Lozada vs Pres. Macapagal-Arroyo, GR. Nos. 184379-80 (2012)
11. Writ of Habeas Data
Gamboa vs. Chan, GR. No. 193636 (2012)
Vivares vs. St. Theresas College, GR. No. 202666 (2014)

VII. Judicial Enforcement of Administrative Action

GSIS vs. CSC, 202 SCRA 799 (1991)
MMDA vs. Concerned Residents, supra, and the subsequent
Resolution (2011)
Ysmael, vs Deputy Executive Secretary, 190 SCRA 673 (1990)