Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1.0 OBJECTIVE
3.0 INTRODUCTION
During the design process for beams it would not be unreasonable for one to
assume that no part of the beam should experience a stress greater than that allowable
for the working material. However, it can be found that a beam will withstand much
larger forces before collapse than simple elastic theory predict.
In the analysis, as the stress increased further the plasticity spread inwards
until anentire cross section of structure has yield point. At the yield point,
the steel attain itsmaximum possible moment capacity called the plastic moment,
M p. The development of the hinge caused a redistribution enables the structure to
carry more loads after first hingehas formed.
The second plastic hinge forms at the next most critical stage. On further
increasein stress, the bending moments at the section of the two plastic hinges remain
constant attheir plastic moments and it keep increasing until the third plastic hinges
continoues until collapse of structure. Plastic analysis considers the behavior of
structure in plastic limit before the sturcture collpase.
4.0 THEORY
PLASTIC ANALYSIS
When a beam is bent around the neutral axis, the stress through the
beam section varies with the distance from the neutral axis, form
the greatest att the extreme fibres
( y= maximum) to zero at the neutral axis ( y = 0).
y
(max)
Neutral
y
axis
y
Plastic portion
Neutral axis
y
PLASTIC ANALYSIS
Eventually the elastic portion will far enough into the beam andthe
beam will be fully plastic. It will form a plastic hinge and be
unable ti resist any further bending moment ( shown below)
y
Neutral axis y
The ratio of the fully plastic bending to the just plastic moment
is call FORM FACTOR. The form factor is entirely dependent on the
shape of the beam and not on the size, material or fixing condition.
4WL
y
bd
Yield stress .equation 1
WL
Mp
4
Maximum bending moment, ..
equation 2
M y yI y
Mp My
Experiment form factor = where the text book
value is 1.5
PLASTIC ANALYSIS
5.0 PROCEDURE
6.0 APPARATUS
PLASTIC ANALYSIS
7.0 RESULT
Deflection Force
(mm) (N)
0 0
3 218
6 264
9 295
12 326
15 359
18 371
21 394
24 403
27 407
30 412
33 418
36 418
PLASTIC ANALYSIS
Table 1 : Result for experiment ( Simply Supported
Beam)
8.0 DISCUSSION
From the graph force versus deflection, we can see the graph is
increased steadily. When the value of force increase, the value of
the deflection also increase.
When the value of the deflection is 36mm the value of the force is
418N constant from value before that which is when the deflection
is 33mm, the value of force is also 418N. According to the graph, the
maximum load is 418N when the defelction reaches at 36mm. The
beam will be achieved the collapse load if we continue to do
experiment with the high load.
2. From Table 1, note the collapse load, and using the bending
moment diagram calculate the plastic moment ( Mp).
3
91.96 10 Nmm
M P PL
M P+ =
2 4
3 M P PL
=
2 4
6 MP
P=
L
3
6 (91.96 10 )
880
collapse load
627 N )
yI
My=
y
y =325 Mpa
=325N/mm2
b d3
I=
12
8.0 mm ( 8.0 mm )
12
PLASTIC ANALYSIS
341.33 mm4
325 N
(2
)(341.33 m m4)
mm
My=
4. Calculate the form factor (Mp/My) . Compare to the text book
4
value. y
=27733.06 Nmm
=27.73Nm
MP
form factor= h
MY Y=
2
3
91.96 10 Nmm 8 mm
y=
27733.06 Nmm 2
=4mm
=3.316
b h 4 /4
S=
b h2 /6
= 1.5
The advantages of considering the extra strength when designing the structures are:
9.0 CONSLUSION
10.0 REFERENCES
Structural analysis, second edition (2009), penerbit UTHM
http://syedalirizwan.com/downloads/8.pdf
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/23795556/Plastic-Analysis-of-Beams