Arms Licence Case:

Bring it ASAP

2nd Appeal:
Leave it pending

Inquiry Forgery Case:

Immediate hearing to Re-issue Notice through Police

Mutation Case:
Illegal & conspiracy based proceedings 13.4.15 related to Proposed Partition deed
as per the ongoing forgery-related inquiry case which has been instituted
on my various complaint to the competent authority & subsequently forwarded to
this court, the patwari has made addmission under oath that In undisputed-
revenue-partition u/s 178 of CGLRC case - R.N./03/A-27/2012-13 tehsildar
Baikunthpur Korea c.g., the proceeding of the Proposed Partition deed dated
13.4.15 was physically undertaken at the suitland, in the presence of the cosharers
& the villagers & as a proof of evidance subsequently signed by the witnesses.
however, when the said evidence was presented in the relevant court, it had been
objected by the cosharers, that the Proposed Partition deed dated 13.4.15 is
prepared without issuing notice to anybody, & the cosharer had no knowledge
about the proceeding. infact, its a conspiracy based fake document prepared by
patwari & the witnesses who attested it and thus liable to be rejected. However,
the presiding offer of the court corruptly (evidence of his corruption had been
produced alongwith the related complaints & also has been a point of
consideration in the subsequent appeal) unheared the said objection dated
16.4.2015 as he himself was the part of the said conspiracy. As a result, he
corruptly paased the impunged order dated 8.6.15. Thus, offence of not only
criminal conspiracy, forgery has been committed in the said partitiion case but the
proceedings were against the relevant rules & provisions of CGLRC on the
account that not only the proceedings in the case were improperly undertaken
against the orders & provisions of CPC but at the same time none of the
mandatory requirements, as per orders/rules mentioned in section 178 CGLRC,
had been fulfilled. thus, the said order 8.6.15 has got to be rejected as order-
without-jurisdiction, null & void-ab-initio.
also, since primary evidance is available on record to prooving the
allegations, all the concerned has committed cognizable offencees under IPC and
Criminal Contempt of Court act and thus liable to be punished accordingly.

Stay order 2.7.15 communicATED to all concernd, thus

in the light of the fact that there was pending 1st appeal & the stay order
2.7.15, which was communicATED to all the concerned (the respondents, patwari,
registrar, tehsildar) and as per mandatory Restrictions imposed by section ???
 transfer of property act, all the proceedings which was initiated on 3.9.15, finally
ordered on 22.9.15 was order-without-jurisdiction, null & void-ab-initio.
Also, since Stay order 2.7.15 was communicATED to all concernd, all the
concerned knowingly conspired against the appealant to defeat the purpose of the
appeal related to the said property, thus committed offence under IPC and
Criminal Contempt of Court act and thus liable to be punished accordingly.

prohibited to execute anything related to during pending 2nd appeal suit

Demarcation Dispute:
DM SDM Reminder

Inquiry - Criminal Hostel Demolishion

DM SDM Reminder

Right to use Case:

Uptake issue in Inquiry Case

Criminal Contempt of Court:

- -

- --
/ ,
, -

,

- - ,

- , --
, -
,
, ,
- -,

, ( ) ,
, ,
, ,

,
- - -
/ , /


 , , ,
, , ,

, - ,
,

-
-193, 201,

27.07.2016
- -504, 506, 355,
352, 323, , -

,

202 Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to
inform

),

FIR Leave it pending , then File Complaint Case Additional Session Court