Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SKYROOM PLAINTIFF
VS. Case No . - -- - -
Comes now the Plaintiff, SK YROOM, by its attorneys, the Morley Law Firm, PLLC. and for
is an administrative agency of the State of Arkansas with its principal office in Little Rock. Pulaski
County, Arkansas.
2. This Petition for Judicial Review is filed pursuant to the Arkansas Administrative
Procedures Act, A.C.A. 25-\5-20 1, et. ~. and venue is proper in Pulaski County. Further,
3. On August 17, 2016, the Plai ntiff filed an application for transfer of location of Private
Club Permit #00793 for purpose of transferring said permit from 4726 Asher Avenue, Little Rock,
Pulaski County, Arkansas, to 4634 W. Dixon Road , Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. The
4. On October 14, 2016, the Director of ABC denied the Plaintiffs transfer of location
application. The Plaintiff filed a proper notice appealing the Director's decision and a hearing was
subsequently held before the ABC Board on December 14, 2016.
5. The Plaintiff appeared through its officer and managing agent. Billy Pope, who offered
testimony and exhibits all of which were entered of record at the hearing . Despite offering
Sll bstantial evidence of record through its representati ve, the ABC Board voted to deny the Plainti ff s
application for transfer of location by 3-2 vote. A copy of the ABC Board decision is attached
6. The findings of the ABC Board are arbitrary, capriciolls and wholly unsupported by
substantial evidence of record as required by A.C .A. 25-15-212 and other appl icable law.
7. The decision of the ABC to deny the Plaintiff's transfer of location was made upon
unlawful procedure and affected by errors of law and evidence in derogation of A.CA. 25-15-212
8. The Plaintiff and its members are injured in their person and property by the action of the
ABC in denying a transfer of location , the practical effect of the ABC Board decision is to adversely
effect the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff's members right offree association. Plaintiffis entitled to invoke
9. Plaintiffhas requested the Defendant, ABC, prepare a transcript of the proceedings before
the ABC Board which will be filed with the Court in accordance with law.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, SK VROOM , prays the Court enter its Order reversing the decision
of the Defendant. ABC, dated December 14,2016, as being in violation of Arkansas Administrative
Procedures Act, A.CA. 25-15-20 I et.~. and other applicable law and for all other just and proper
SKYROOM
BOARD DECISION
On the 14th day of December, 2016, the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control
Board convened at Little Rock, Arkansas for its regular monthly meeting. In
attendance were Board Members, Janet Moore Chairperson, Thomas P. Powell, Jr.,
Steven Smith, Jean Hervey, and special appointee, Eric Herget.
Billy Pope appeared at the hearing and offered testimony in support of the
application. Mr. Pope was represented by his attorney, Stephen E. Morley.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
EXHIBIT
J F1
Billy Pope testified he lives in Bryant, Arkansas. His address is within thirty
five (35) miles of the proposed location. Mr. Pope testified he has lived in Bryant for
eighteen (18) years. Mr. Pope testified that if his application is granted, he will
operate this establishment in accordance with the laws of the State of Arkansas, and
he will pay his taxes. Mr. Pope testified he has attended the ABC seminar. Mr. Pope
testified he worked for the prior owners of Visions, Sensations, and Illusions. He
testified he also had dealings with club now known as Paper Moon. Mr. Pope testified
he has years of experience working in bars. Mr. Pope testified he has never personally
been charged with violations for selling to minors or intoxicated patrons. Mr. Pope
testified in his past experiences with private clubs, he always paid his taxes and
maintained a reputation as a responsible permit holder.
Mr. Pope testified there has not been an alcoholic beverage license issued to a
gentleman's club in Pulaski County in many years. He testified people have tried tD
open "byob" establishments. Mr. Pope testified he has never tried to do that, and he
is of the opinion it is better to operate an establishment with law and structure. MI'.
Pope testified based on his experience and age, he understands the gentleman's club
business. He testified he believes there is a demand for it, and people enjoy them if
they are run correctly. Mr. Pope testified having a good management team is
important, and he has put together a good team. He testified there is more to running
a gentleman's club than just having girls around.
Mr. Pope submitted aerial maps showing the location of the proposed business.
The maps were admitted and marked collectively as Exhibit 3. The property sits at
the corner of Dixon Road and Arch Street. The intersection is controlled by a traffic
light. This is a large tract of land, and Mr. Pope does not intend to use the entire
piece of land for his business. Mr. Pope testified there is a concrete plant across the
road from the proposed location that is open almost twenty four (24) hours per day.
There are three (3) different shifts of workers each day at the plant. Mr. Pope testified
the Little Rock Police training academy is located down the road on Arch Street. A
Pulaski County Sheriffs Department substation is also located nearby on Arch
Street. Mr. Pope submitted a plot plan of the property on which he intends to build
his business. The plan was marked and received as Applicant's Exhibit 4. The
building will sit on two (2) acres; but it will not occupy the entire piece of property.
Mr. Pope submitted a series of architectural drawings depicting a general outline and
construction of the building. The drawings were admitted and marked collectively as
Applicant's Exhibit 5. Mr. Pope also submitted a photo depicting abuilding with a
fac;ade similar to his proposed building. It was admitted and marked as Applicant's
Exhibit 6. The building is to be a metal building with a stone and stucco veneer. Tl:e
building will be 8,500 sq. feet. Mr. Pope submitted a proposed floor plan. The floor
plan was admitted and marked as Applicant's Exhibit 7. Mr. Pope testified the
upstairs portion of the building will be a ''VIP'' area, and it will overlook the
downstairs area. He testified there will not be any individual rooms.
Mr. Pope submitted a proposed food menu to the Board. The menu was
admitted and marked as Applicant's Exhibit 8. He testified he plans on offering food.
He has found that there is often a lunch crowd at these establishments. The food will
be available during operating hours.
Mr. Pope submitted a map of Pulaski County showing the locations of existing
gentleman's clubs. The map was admitted and marked as Applicant's Exhibit 9. Mr.
Pope testified the existing clubs are in older buildings. His location will be new
construction. There will be parking for 150 to 200 cars. He will have extreme lighting
in the parking lot to discourage loitering. Mr. Pope testified he intends to have twelve
(12) employees and one (1) security guard for every thirty (30) people. Mr. Pope
testified his hours of operation will be from 11:00 a.m. until 5:00 a.m., seven (7) days
a week.
FINDINGS OF FACT
After a review of the evidence on file with the Alcoholic Beverage Control
Administration and the testimony offered, the Board finds as follows:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Based upon all the testimony and evidence discussed in the Findings of Fact
above, the Board concludes that Billy Pope is not a qualified applicant to operate a
private club at the proposed location and the transfer of this club is not in the public
interest as required by Ark. Code Ann. 3-9-222(f). Mr. Pope failed to disclose on his
original entertainment form that there would be female dancers performing in the
club. The Board does not find Mr. Pope's explanation that everyone knows
gentleman's clubs have female dancers to be credible 01' accurate. "Gentleman's Club"
is not defined in ABC Rules and Regulations, and it may mean different things to
different individuals based upon their experiences. The entertainment form
completed by Mr. Pope specifically refers to Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control
Rule 1.34, which states as follows: "Any permit issued by the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Division shall remain valid only for use in the business described in the
original application .... The maintenance of such business operations shall be deemed
a condition of the permittee's right to ret.ain any permit." As Mr. Pope disclosed in .s
testimony, female dancers are the main focus of clubs he calls "gentleman's clubs' ;
how ever, he failed to disclose t.hat fact anywhere on his application. By his omission
on the e ntertainment form, he was already jeopardizing 1 i right to opera te the cl ub
before it even opened for business. The Arkansas Supreme Court has said that the
burden of proof lies with the applicant to show that he is qualified to hold a perm it
and that the permit is in the public interest. See Arlwnsas ABC Bd. V. King, 275 Arh.
308, 629 S. W2d 288 (1982). The Board finds Mr. Pope concealed a material purpose
for the operation of this proposed club; therefore, he has failed to meet his burden to
show he is a qualified applicant. As authorized by ABC Rule and Regulation l.21,
the Board also considers the testimony of ABC Agent Danzy regarding the opposition
to the club expressed by area residents and Agent Heroman's testimony regarding
his concerns about the club's negative impact on a nearby neighborhood. The Board
notes that Agent Danzy did not believe the individuals she communicated with
understood the club's intent to feature female dancers. Due to Mr. Pope's
concealment of the club's intent on the entertainment form, it is impossible for the
Board to accurately ga uge the opinions of area residents, public officials, and local
law enforcement officers, beea use they were not apprised of the true intent ofthe club
during the comment period afforded to them by law.
GGJl?'YLu~
J ET MOORE, CRt\IRPERSON