510 nail

As a medical investigative reporter for 28 years, I've seen public interest in health
freedom come and go. Right now, in 2010, it is at a low point.

In the early 1990s, there was a tremendous fervor in America. Millions of people,
perceiving a threat from the federal government, realized they could be cut off from
the right to improve their health according to their own wishes, judgments, and
decisions.

In practical terms, health freedom has come to mean: the right to have access to
the widest possible range of nutritional supplements, health practitioners, and
treatments-with no government obstruction.

Back in 1993, millions of Americans believed in that principle, and sent letters to
Congress. Rallies were held. Celebrities appeared and supported traditional
American liberty.

The final blow was struck with the passage of the Dietary Supplement Health Act of
1994 (DSHEA). It appeared to promise the results citizens were looking for. The FDA
would not be permitted to limit access to the full range of nutritional supplements.

Then the furor died down and people went back to their lives. The internet grew into
a giant. Millions of pages discussing health issues appeared. More freedom. More
access.

But there has been an overall dampening of that spirit of the early 90s. Many people
believe the major battle has been won.

To examine whether this is the case, and whether the DSHEA Law is actually
keeping Americans safe, I interviewed a widely revered lawyer, Jonathan Emord.

510 nail

Emord is one of the nation's leading free speech attorneys. He has defeated the
Food and Drug Administration a remarkable seven times in federal court, more
times than any other attorney in American history, earning him the title, "FDA
Dragon Slayer."

He is the 2007 recipient of the Cancer Control Society's Humanitarian Award for
"winning and preserving our great civil rights to life, to liberty, and to health
freedoms."

Mr. Emord has practiced constitutional and administrative law in Washington, D.C.
for the past twenty-five years. He is routinely consulted by industry, Congress, and
the media on regulatory issues that affect health freedom. He is the author of four
critically acclaimed books: Freedom, Technology and the First Amendment (1991);
The Ultimate Price (2007); The Rise of Tyranny (2008); and Global Censorship of
Health Information (2010).

I hoped Mr. Emord would give us real and detailed information on substantive issues
facing Americans today. He responded in kind, and went the extra mile. He cleared
up a number of popular confusions, and offered several predictions based on his
long experience as an attorney in the field of health freedom.

One of the most critical points Mr. Emord makes: The laws Congress passes can be
twisted by the federal agencies responsible for overseeing those laws. For example,
the FDA has reinterpreted health law to suit its own slanted purposes. This is an
extreme violation of the Constitution, and it endangers the American Republic.
Federal agencies can, in effect, illegally become legislators and enforcers.

This is not a brush-off interview. Mr. Emord provides a compelling and extensive
case that should be read, studied, and acted on by other attorneys, health-freedom
advocates, nutritional-company executives, and all citizens who value their
freedom. https://www.sourcevapes.com/products/source-nail-portable-
enail-510-attachment?variant=18927883206