Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Libby Peterson
Ms. Moser
Period 7
25 April, 2017
On September 30, 1999, Thomas Simpson was found dead by the police. The police were
called by Dale Reynolds, who admitted to shooting his stepfather (Simpson), but claimed it was
in self defense. Reynolds had experienced years of abuse at the hands of his stepfather, leading
professionals to believe he suffers from battered child syndrome, a condition similar to battered
women syndrome. The State of Washington claims that Dale acted with a premeditated intent to
cause the death of his stepfather, and did cause his death. This would be a First-Degree Murder
and this claim should have been the result of the trial. However, the jury charged Reynolds with
second degree murder, claiming he did not previously plan to kill Simpson, but this is not
The first witness was Jan Martinez, a previous girlfriend of Dales. She said that in
months leading up to the murder night he had been grumpier than usual, in a darker place. Every
morning, Jan would visit Reynolds and they would go to school together. He had a loaded gun
that morning, he showed it to me. He told me he planned to kill Simpson. That statement is
plain and clear, not one that can be argued one way or the next. It can only be said that this was a
premeditated crime. Dale himself said that before that day, he had never planned to kill Simpson,
but its obvious that he gave it some thought. He may not have been planning it for years,
however this day matters more than any other. He knew the potential consequences and told his
The witness that swayed this conclusion the most was Dale Reynolds himself. Afterall, he
was the only one at the scene of his death and even though he claims the murder was in self
defense, he shows more supporting his conviction of first degree murder. He makes one
particular statement that came back multiple times throughout the trial. I drank some of his
alcohol to make him angry. Dale says. The Prosecuting Lawyer then asked, Do you feel that
without alcohol, you couldnt follow through with it? Dale told him that yes, he felt that he
needed the alcohol and his stepfathers anger. This shows that Dales full intent was to murder
Simpson, not just injure him or keep himself safe. He was looking for a reason to kill Simpson,
he knew that if he didnt make Simpson angry, he wouldnt be able to murder him.
It could be argued that due to Reynolds was simply acting in self defense. Doctor Pat
Caroll, an expert on the syndrome, says that kids who have it are able to sense when an attack is
going to happen. She claimed that the defendant was assuming the role as protector. In his mind,
it was kill or be killed. However, the prosecuting lawyer pointed out Simpson would beat Dale
and his mother and threaten to kill them for things such as not taking out the trash or completing
their chores. Having death threats was not unusual for Dale, and though he shouldnt have to
put up with this, he did on a daily basis. There is no evidence that anything out of the usual
happened this day that should cause him to be more concerned than usual. When the body was
found, there was no sign of struggle, meaning Dale made the decision to kill him, walked
through the door, and shot him. All planned with nothing to provoke Reynolds.
In conclusion, the jury has made a mistake in their conviction. This was not a crime of
passion nor an event that got out of hand. Dale didnt just want to injure his stepfather, he wanted
to be rid of him, to be rid of him abuser. He was successful. He killed Simpson just as he planned
and now he should be punished. It is a tough case, it could have easily gone either way, but one
Peterson3
conviction would have been more correct than the other, and sadly, Dale has been convicted with