Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
David Hernandez
Mr. O Grady
AP Psychology
3 February 2017
Lawrence Kohlberg is best known for his multi stage theory that aimed to describe how
our moral values and ability to reason develop over our lifespan. The theory is the most famous
and studied on the topic of moral development. While it is the most famous, like any theory it
Lawrence Kohlberg was born in Bronxville, New York on October 25, 1995. He served
in the merchant marines during WWII and later helped smuggle Jews into Palestine. After being
captured and later escaping, he lived in Palestine until he was able to return to America. He
enrolled in the University of Chicago and that is where he began to read into Piagets theory of
and at Harvard, but his teaching was cut short with his suicide by drowning in 1987.
In summary, the theory categorizes our ability to reason into three levels: the
preconventional level, the conventional level, and the postconventional level. The
preconventional level is usually in those under 6 years old (Barons). Those in it often focus on
not being punished. They are scared of their upper authorities (parents, police, etc) and focus on
their own well being. The conventional level follows and lasts from approximately 7-11 years of
age. Those in this stage are heavily influenced by their environment and act in a way to look
good to others in their society. They believe in intentions when determining whether an action
Hernandez 2
was right or wrong. The final stage is the postconventional and starts around 11 years of age and
lasts for life. People in this stage believe in personal ethics, human rights, and universal good
will (Barons). Not everyone reaches the final stage as most people actually stay in the
conventional stage.
One positive of this theory is that it fit well with Piagets theory of cognitive
development. This is due to the fact that Kohlberg was expanding on Piagets accounts on moral
development (Simply Psychology). Piagets theory in turn can be used to help reinforce
Kohlberg's and the same vice-versa. An example would be Kohlberg's pre conditional level and
Piagets preoperational stage. Both levels share very similar time lengths, with Piagets lasting
from around 2 years of age to 7 and Kohlbergs lasting up to 7 years of age. Piagets
preoperational stage is described as a child being able to symbolize objects and imagine, but still
be unable to see other peoples points of view. The child in turn doesnt really consider the
beliefs and feelings of others. Their egocentric beliefs can be seen in Kohlbergs pre conditional
level as well. In this level, the child focuses mostly on whether they will be punished or
rewarded. The child also becomes driven by self-interest and often asks what they would receive
as a reward for doing something. They only look out for themselves. Both theories are similar
Another strength of Kohlbergs theory is how he obtained the moral development of his
subjects. Kohlberg obtained his information by asking a series of dilemmas to various subjects of
different ages. One example is the Heinz dilemma, where a poor man has to choose whether or
not he should steal medicine from a local store or help his dying wife. The subjects all answered
and gave their reasoning as to whether he should or should not steal the medicine. Their
Hernandez 3
reasoning allowed Kohlberg to see how they think morally at their age (Let's Get to Know). By
using this information, Kohlberg was able to understand how someone is able to justify their
actions at certain age periods. For example, many younger children answered that they would not
steal the medicine because of the fear of getting caught and punished by the authorities (Simply
Psychology). Once the children got older, their reasons started to vary more as many more saw
that the intention outweighed the crime. This helped Kohlberg organize his three levels of moral
development as he was able to see when the children were able to see other points of views and
There are concerns however that Kohlbergs theory does not apply to all groups of
people. For example Carol Gilligan, an American psychologist who was actually Kohlbergs
research assistant at Harvard, argued that Kohlbergs theory was based on the responses of boys
and ignored how girls felt about the dilemmas. She also stated that females think differently
morally than males as females want to know more about the situation before making a moral
decision (Barons). Another argument was that Kohlbergs theory only applies to western
cultures. His theory supposedly follows cultural norms in western societies, but doesnt take into
account what the norms may be in another culture (Everyday Life). Whether Kohlberg's theory
Another concern about the theory is the effectiveness of the scenarios being given.
Kohlbergs research was conducted on various boys between the ages of 10-16, and some of the
scenarios given, like the Heinz one, didnt apply to the subjects personally. None of the subjects
had ever been married at the time on the experiment and wouldnt have any idea what it felt like
Hernandez 4
to be married and in risk of losing their spouse (Simply Psychology). It would have been more
accurate if they were given scenarios that were more realistic for their age and environment.
Kohlberg's theory remains relevant today as it gives a thorough and fairly accurate description of
how we develop morally. Every theory is going to have its critics and concerns, however that is
ok since criticism can help improve theories. After all, theories arent necessarily 100% true,
they are just our attempt to explain our world to the best of our understanding.
Hernandez 5
Works Cited
"Kohlberg." Moral Development | Simply Psychology. 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 01 Feb. 2017.
McEntarffer, Robert, and Allyson Weseley. Barron's AP Psychology. Hauppauge, NY: Barron's
"Pros & Cons of Kohlberg's Moral Development." Our Everyday Life. Web. 01 Feb. 2017.