Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
31-40
Printed in Great Britain
SUMMARY
A field experiment was carried out to compare the performance of 18 accessions of jackbean
from different origins. Plant development and phenology, final plant biomass, and seed yield
and its components were evaluated. Flowering time ranged from 56 to 109 days after sowing.
Bush and climbing types were identified and differences in seed yield were recorded, the largest
yield occurring in a mid-season flowering accession. It was concluded that more material should
be screened since germplasm introduction appears to be a promising route to larger jackbean
yields in Yucatan.
RESUMEN
Un experimento de campo fue llevado a cabo para comparar el comportamiento de 18 accesiones
de C. ensiformis provinientes de ori'genes distintos. El desarollo, la fenologi'a y la biomasa final
de las plantas, asf como el rendimiento de la semilla y los componentes del rendimiento de la
semilla fueron evaluados. El tiempo de la siembra hasta la floracion tuvo un rango de 56 a 109
dias. Se identificaron tipos arbustivos y tipos enredaderas y se registraron variaciones en el rendi-
miento de semilla, el mayor encontrandose en una accesion de floracion intermedia. Se con-
cluyo que mas material debe ser probado ya que la introduction de germoplasma parecio ser
una ruta prometadora a rendimientos mayores de la C. ensiformis en Yucatan.
INTRODUCTION
The experiment was carried out in Yucatan, Mexico, on land cleared of secon-
dary bush. The soil was red, derived from limestone, of pH 7.8-7.9 and about
40 cm deep. General site and weather conditions, crop husbandry and evalua-
tion techniques have been described in a previous paper (Kessler, 1990a). The
accessions and their origins are listed in Table 1. PI material was received from
the United States Department of Agriculture, Regional Plant Introduction
Station, Georgia, USA, and accessions will be identified in the text by their
first three digits only; H material was received from Universidad Central de
Venezuela, Maracay, Venezuela. Seeds were sown on 3 July 1985 in four
blocks. Plots were square and consisted of nine plants at a density of 2.25
plants m~2 surrounded by guard rows of the original jackbean material which
was pruned where necessary to the form of the plants in the plot.
Accessions were categorized into bush or climbing types, and according to
the time to flowering. Bush-type plants were compact, erect, self-supporting,
formed a canopy at about 80-100 cm above ground level and developed stiff
lateral branches at the lower nodes. Climbing-type plants were lax, tended to
wind their stems around supports and had internodes that were about twice the
length of those of the bush types; branches, which arose at the lower nodes,
and the main stems were often over 2 m in length. Accessions that displayed
the climbing habit were supported on an open horizontal framework of parallel
wooden bars placed at a height of 80 cm.
The height of all plants was measured 42 days after sowing (DAS), and the
number of nodes and branches counted. Three accessions were selected at
58 DAS from those which flowered first and, in each plot, three plants were
chosen at random for height measurement and a count of the number of nodes
on the main stem. At 111 DAS, the percentage ground cover of all accessions
Table 1. Jackbean accessions and countries of origin
Accession Origin Accession Origin
RESULTS
Flowering
There was a well-defined group of accessions which flowered at around 58
DAS and these, together with PI279, are classed as early flowering. PI451
followed at 84 DAS and is classed as mid-season flowering, and the rest of the
accessions, which flowered at 91-109 DAS, are classed as late flowering. Early
and mid-season flowering accessions had a much shorter flowering period than
those which flowered later. All accessions had a single flowering period, during
which flowers appeared on the different racemes in an overlapping sequence.
The last observations of flowering were made at 114 DAS when not all plants
had flowered, but all did eventually flower and set pods.
34 C. D.J.KESSLER
12
T
11 1
10
9
44
8
7
6
5
4
3
E
2
1 F
J
n=i
IE
20 0 20150 50 0 50 150150 50 0 50 150250 150 50 0 50 150
Branch length (cm)
1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 2 10 12 3
Branch number
8 " (W ft
7
6
n_
% 5[ |_
i 4 i
3 i
2 [~
1
J
30 20 10 0 20 10 0 10 20 2010 0 10 20 2010 0 10 20
Distribution of pods (%)
Fig. 1. (a) Branching patterns and (b) percentage distribution of pods in jackbean accessions. The vertical
axis represents the main stem starting at the base of the plant, J representing the juvenile leaf node. The
open and shaded histograms represent the total length of branch or the distribution of pods at each node
on the main stem or primary branches, respectively. Bars represent the number of branches in each
category. Early bush refers to PI308 and PI311, mid-season bush to PI451, late bush to the original
accession and late climber to H5, H2a, and H7. N.B. the larger scale of branch length given to the early
bush accessions.
200 cm, respectively, total branch length increased more than 10-fold and
became more concentrated at the lower nodes, and secondary branches increased
both in number and in length. The difference in the length of main stem and
branches between the bush and the climbing accessions was due to the length
of the internodes, since the number of nodes on the main stem was similar in
the two types. The forms of plants in all the early flowering accessions, includ-
ing PI308 and PI311 which were examined in more detail, were broadly similar.
Pods were normally borne singly on the peduncles and although up to three
pods were recorded on some peduncles, others carried no pods. The peduncles
arose either at nodes on the main stem or on branches, and in the later-flowering
and climbing types, pods were concentrated lower on the plants and on branches.
36 C. D.J.KESSLER
60 Early bush
50
40
30
20
g 10
to 0
1 30 Mid-season bush
| 20
Z. 10
c 0
o
3 40 Late bush
= 30
| 20
10
0
30 Late climber
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Peduncle position
Fig. 2. Percentage distribution of ripe pods on individual jackbean peduncles. The horizontal axis repre-
sents the flowering positions on the peduncle, of which Position 1 is basal or lowermost; genotype group-
ings as in Fig. 1.
The positions of pods on the peduncles are shown in Fig. 2. There was a general
trend from a concentration of pods at the lowest peduncle positions in the
early flowering types to a distribution in which the pods were more evenly
spaced along the peduncle in the late flowering climbing accessions.
Table 3. Seed yields, components of seed yield and distribution of dry matter
in plants at seed harvest in jackbean accessions
Single Total Dry matter distribution (%)
Seed Pod Seed seed plant
Access- yield number number weight biomass Harvest pod ped- main
sion (kg ha"1) plant"1 pod"1 (g) (g) index wall uncle stem branch
After the pods matured some new vegetative shoots appeared at the basal
and/or apical nodes of the main stems, especially in the early-flowering acces-
sions. However, these shoots showed limited development and although occa-
sional flowers were also produced, pod formation from them was negligible.
DISCUSSION
Yucatan because of the increased labour requirement and the rocky soil. Thus
in contrast to the unbranched crop ideotype sought in many species (Donald
and Hamblin, 1983), jackbean for Yucatan should perhaps have a branched
habit, capable of maximizing light interception even when sown at low density.
Such a plant type may have a low harvest index, though this remained remark-
ably constant in experiments with the original accession of jackbean despite
large differences in plant biomass and branching (Kessler, 1987). The harvest
index recorded in jackbean was at the low end of the range recorded in grain
legumes (Laing et al., 1984) but may respond to selection. Due to the mosaic
of rocky ridges and red-soil-filled hollows that characterizes the terrain of
Yucatan, it may be appropriate to sow a jackbean type that can respond to
high plant density on the red soil, which is more uniform and in which sowing
is easier, and to sow the more spreading type on the rocky soil where sowing is
more difficult.
The climbing habit in jackbean may be advantageous for intercropping with
maize, although the maize is more likely to be affected by a climbing than by
a bush type of jackbean; however, the late flowering associated with the climb-
ing habit, though increasing complementarity between the species, will probably
be a disadvantage in all but the longest growing seasons.
This experiment has demonstrated variation in agronomically important
characteristics such as seed yield, flowering time and growth habit among
jackbean accessions. The work should be continued in other seasons and an
attempt should be made to screen more material since the experiment shows
germplasm introduction to be a promising avenue to higher jackbean yields in
Yucatan.
Acknowledgements. This work was carried out whilst the author was a Techni-
cal Cooperation Officer of the Overseas Development Administration (UK
Government) and the field work was partially supported by the International
Foundation for Science (Sweden). The jackbean accessions were supplied by
Dr A. Escobar, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay, Venezuela (H
accessions) and by United States Department of Agriculture, Regional Plant
Introduction Station, Experiment, Georgia, USA through the good offices of
Dr G. A. White (PI accessions). Finally, I am particularly grateful to Dr C.
Marshall for help with preparation of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Adams, M. W. & Pipoly III, J. J. (1980). Biological structure, classification and distribution of economic
legumes. In Advances in Legume Science, 1-16 (Eds R. J. Summerfield and A. H. Bunting). London:
HMSO.
Adams, M. W., Coyne, D. P., Davis, J. H. C, Graham, P. H. & Francis, C. A. (1985). Common bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In Grain Legume Crops, 433-476 (Eds R. J. Summerfield and E. H. Roberts).
London: Collins.
Donald, C. M. & Hamblin, J. (1983). The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture. Ad-
vances in Agronomy 36:97-143.
40 C. D.J.KESSLER
Fischer, R. A. & Turner, N. C. (1978). Plant productivity in the arid and semiarid zones. Annual Review
of Plant Physiology 29:277-317.
Hall, A. E. & Grantz, D. A. (1981). Drought resistance of cowpea improved by selecting for early ap-
pearance of mature pods. Crop Science 21:461-464.
Hall, A. E. & Patel, P. N. (1985). Breeding for resistance to drought and heat. In Cowpea Research, Pro-
duction and Utilization, 137-151 (Eds S. R. Singh and K. O. Rachie). Chichester: Wiley-Interscience.
Hymowitz, T. & Newell, C. A. (1980). Taxonomy, speciation, domestication, dissemination, germplasm
resources and variation in the genus Glycine. In Advances in Legume Science, 251-264 (Eds R. J.
Summerfield and A. H. Bunting). London: HMSO.
Kessler, C. D. J. (1987). Agronomic studies of the tropical legume Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC. (jack-
bean) in Yucatan, Mexico. PhD thesis: University of Wales.
Kessler, C. D. J. (1990a). An agronomic evaluation of jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis) in Yucatan, Mexico.
I. Plant density. Experimental Agriculture 26:11-22.
Kessler, C. D. J. (1990b). An agronomic evaluation of jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis) in Yucatan, Mexico.
II. Defoliation and time of sowing. Experimental Agriculture 26:23-30.
Laing, D. R., Jones, P. G. & Davis, J. H. C. (1984). Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In The Physio-
logy of Tropical Field Crops, 305-351 (Eds P. R. Goldsworthy and N. M. Fisher), Chichester: Wiley-
Interscience.
NAS (National Academy of Sciences) (1979). Tropical Legumes: Resources for the Future. Washington,
D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
Ojehomon, O. O., Rathjen, A. S. & Morgan, D. G. (1968). Effects of daylength on the morphology and
flowering of five determinate varieties of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cam-
bridge 71:209-214.
Sauer.J. & Kaplan, L. (1969). Canavalia beans in American prehistory. American Antiquity 34:417-424.
Steele, W. M., Allen, D. J. & Summerfield, R. J. (1985). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). In Grain
Legume Crops, 520-583 (Eds R. J. Summerfield and E. H. Roberts). London: Collins.
Summerfield, R. J., Pate, J. S., Roberts, E. H. & Wien, H. C. (1985). The physiology of cowpeas. In Cow-
pea Research, Production and Utilization, 66-101 (Eds S. R. Singh and K. 0. Rachie). Chichester:
Wiley-Interscience.