0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
12 Ansichten4 Seiten
During the last decade citizen's access to information is opposed by the foreces of red tape in the morally corrupt institutions that are expected to be transparent and accountable, presently the empty compliance of access to information is that whatever information is disclosed is addressed to one Mrs Manjula parasher though RTI applicant's name is Shri Gopal Soni.
Originaltitel
29.05.17 DOPT Info to Cic by NIACL CPIO Instead of Applicant
During the last decade citizen's access to information is opposed by the foreces of red tape in the morally corrupt institutions that are expected to be transparent and accountable, presently the empty compliance of access to information is that whatever information is disclosed is addressed to one Mrs Manjula parasher though RTI applicant's name is Shri Gopal Soni.
During the last decade citizen's access to information is opposed by the foreces of red tape in the morally corrupt institutions that are expected to be transparent and accountable, presently the empty compliance of access to information is that whatever information is disclosed is addressed to one Mrs Manjula parasher though RTI applicant's name is Shri Gopal Soni.
Online Right to Information Application 29/05/2017
DOPT, New Delhi.
Re: Seeking information as per Right to Information Act,2005
Public Authority: Central Information Commission/DOPT
The applicant seeks information of principles/practice of RTI act, 2005
(1). Any circular/guideline issued by DOPT and/or CIC that information be
addressed by name to Central Information Commissioner and merely a copy of that be addressed to the information seeker. Please note the applicant is affected by mockery of the RTI as per details given below. 2). Information of intent of legislature ,in respect of para no.1 above Regards,
Shrigopal Soni C231,Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004 https://twitter.com/revribhav Cell No. 9414982395
6/01/2017 Central Information Commissioner hearing respondent is New
Case No. India Assurance Co. Ltd (NIACL). CIC/MP/A/2016 Date of Decision : 30 January 2017 /000371 RTI application of applicant 9/07/2015 Respondent present during hearing:- Deputy Manager, NIACL, Jaipur RO , He is not the CPIO of NIACL,CIC permits his presence. Argument for denial of information:-
30/01/2017 Order for disclosure to applicant a tiny fraction of information is
issued by Mrs. Manjula Parasher 14/02/2017 CPIO, discloses merely a copy of information supplied to the CIC (please see page no.3) to the applicant.
Relevant history to the present RTI applicantion
2006-07 Applicants article on RTI is published by NIACL Jaipur magazine 12/06/ Even before the process of domestic enquiry the applicants misconduct 2008 is spread as propaganda in the Central Information Commission by NIACL 2
12.10.1999 Ethics applicable to PSU decision makers stipulate the
following:- The Book of Dos and Donts List of Donts:-DO NOT:- Be arbitrary or capricious in your decisions, your decisions should be justifiable and based on sound reasons.
29.04.2008 CVC the nodal agency for abuse of public money/abuse of
authority issues written directions to NIACL to ensure that the applicant is not harassed in any manner.
question To Credibility of the CVO of no.1 non life insurance co
19/01 Abuse of chief vigilance officer for giving fake
/2009 information of hindi translator post; Mrs. Gopa Ray GM Chief Vigilance Officer, NIACL, writes to CVC . CVO NIACL stresses the specialized designation of applicant a Hindi Translator 3 times.
27/06/ A. R. Sekar NIACLs senior most General Managers order to
2009 applicant: RTI forwarded by National Human Rights Commission: It (seeking access to information under RTI) is a crude attempt to confuse the different authorities and an attempt to escape from the due process of law
Corruption in NIACL Jaipur News published in most of
11.02. newspapers. One employee caught taking bribe in the course 2009 of his duties of NIACL, Jaipur; enjoyed full pay during so called inquiry, he was never subjected to suspension even for one day. NIACLs Head Office Vigilance Officials RTI reply :- applicant has expressed his opinion about state of corruption in its confirmation asked information about third party, hence denied. The ethics is that even an exempted body, e.g. CBI cannot deny info of corruption of employees. RTI fee is paid online by applicant. 3 4
Alarming inequalities:- Impossible demand of
money from petitioner on behalf of NIACL:-
NIACL orders to petitioner RTI/date Amount of
reference money to pay for information Appeal No.0133/2007-08 A.R.Sekar G.M. 10.03.2008 Rs.34000/ Appeal No.0126/08 V. Jayaprakash,G.M. 3.08.2008 Rs. 13000/- CORP :HRM:SKS:2008 Atul SahaiChief Mgr 10.09.2008 Rs. 65000/- As above R.K.Uppal Chief Mgr 8.09.2008 Rs.26000/- CORP :HRM:CLASS1CELL:2008 AtulSahai 28.01.2008 Rs.15000/ ChiefMgr CORP :HRM:CLASS1CELL:2008 AtulSahai 24.01.2008 Rs.34000/ ChiefMgr
On the other hand resourceful GIPSA -NIACL officials invoke a
citizens Right to Information as corporate incarnate;. e.g. one S. S. Hira, salary No. 15287 sought information from Central Board of Direct Taxes on 13.10.2009 regarding income IT/TDS challan, trading account, Audit report etc in respect of 4 persons. On behalf of NIACL second appeal was preferred against the Central Govt. It was heard on 3.01. 2011 by Central Information Commission (Appeal No. CIC/ LS/ A/ 2010/ 001130DS) .The Chief Manager who secured iii rd party disclosure in the course of his official duty is promoted as Dy. General Manager,NIACL. .
It deters criminals from committing serious crimes. Common sense tells us that the most frightening thing for a human being is to lose their life; therefore, the death penalty is the best deterrent when it comes (1).pdf