CE 164 FOUNDATION ENGINEERING First Project

Maddhu thumaluru, Ph. D.,P.E. Cristina Lindstrom

Spring Semester 2017 11499631
Date: 4/10/2017

Shallow Foundations

Boring Information
Water
Date completed/ Boring No of Samples Depth
Boring #
Finished Depth Disturbed Undisturbed (ft)
1 3/16/2010 75' 5 13 16'
2 3/17/2010 55' 1 13 17'-6"
3 3/17/2010 55' 2 16 12'
4 3/16/2010 55' 0 10 18'
5 3/15/2010 56'-6" 0 4 15'
6 3/15/2010 75' 1 5 13'
12 3/17/2010 11'-5" 2 12 -
Table 1.

General Soil Conditions of Site

Depth Soil Classification

0'-6"-4'-0" Lean Clay (CL)
4'-6' San with Silt and Gravel (SM or SP-SM
6'-16' Gravel with Silt and Sand (GP-GM or GW-
16'-25' Clay (CL)
25'-29' Sand with Silt and Gravel (SP-SM)
30'-55' Clay (CL)
Table 2.

Groundwater Conditions

Boring # Groundwater Depth

1 16'
2 17'-6"
3 12'
4 18'
5 15'
6 13'
12 -

SBR-1 SBR-2
Unconfined Unconfined
Dry Water Dry Water
Elevation Compressive Elevation Compressive
Density Content Density Content
(ft) Strength (ft) Strength
(psf) (pcf) % (psf) (pcf) %
 Unconfined Unconfined
Dry Water Dry Water
Elevation Compressive Elevation Compressive
Density Content Density Content
(ft) Strength (ft) Strength
(psf) (pcf) % (psf) (pcf) %
140 140 4
135 3 135 2
130 2000 110 14 130 1500 105 13
125 2580 114 16 125 1750 100 12
120 2000 105 12 120 1800 100 20
115 2630 112 16 115 2340 109 15
110 110 6
105 2200 110 20 105 5370 114 14
100 2610 110 18 100 2540 97 22
95 4760 114 17 95
90 4000 115 16 90
85 85
80 80
75 75

SBR-3 SBR-4
Unconfined Unconfined
Dry Water Dry Water
Elevation Compressive Elevation Compressive
Density Content Density Content
(ft) Strength (ft) Strength
(psf) (pcf) % (psf) (pcf) %

140 8030 114 9 140 7

135 1500 105 20 135 3580 104 11
130 5280 109 19 130 2000 101 11
125 2310 107 16 125 2200 100 16
120 2500 110 13 120 105 9
115 2240 108 19 115
110 110 3000 110 4
105 1730 115 12 105
100 2040 102 14 100 4630 105 20
95 2080 105 21 95
90 90
85 85
80 80
75 75

SBR-5 SBR-6
Unconfined Unconfined
Dry Water Dry Water
Elevation Compressive Elevation Compressive
Density Content Density Content
(ft) Strength (ft) Strength
(psf) (pcf) % (psf) (pcf) %

140 940 98 19 140 103 13

135 960 97 14 135 2500 103 9
130 760 105 16 130 2330 86 10
125 4640 113 16 125 2400 90 9
120 1920 111 17 120 6350 114 11
 115 1470 106 16 115 117 9
110 4 110 1750 114 16
105 105 1800 16
100 2650 102 22 100 2310 104 15
95 3100 105 21 95 1640 113 15
90 1320 106 23 90
85 85
80 80
75 75
For SBR-12 data was not tabulated. The rest of boring logs show results more significant that are
used for calculations. Also, theres no ground water present in this layer where the boring test was
performed.

Elevation c Elevation c SBR

(ft) SBR (ft)
140 8030 SBR-3 120 2000 SBR-1
140 940 SBR-5 120 1800 SBR-2
120 2500 SBR-3
120 1920 SBR-5
Elevation c 120 6350 SBR-6
(ft) SBR
135 1500 SBR-3
135 3580 SBR-4
135 960 SBR-5 Elevation c SBR
135 2500 SBR-6 (ft)
115 2630 SBR-1
115 2340 SBR-2
Elevation c 115 2240 SBR-3
(ft) 115 1470 SBR-5
130 2000 SBR-1
130 1500 SBR-2
130 5280 SBR-3 Elevation c SBR
130 2000 SBR-4 (ft)
130 760 SBR-5 110 3000 SBR-4
130 2330 SBR-6 110 1750 SBR-6

Elevation c Elevation c SBR

(ft) (ft)
125 2580 SBR-1 105 2200 SBR-1
125 1750 SBR-2 105 5370 SBR-2
125 2310 SBR-3 105 1730 SBR-3
125 2200 SBR-4 105 1800 SBR-6
125 4640 SBR-5
125 2400 SBR-6
 Average Dry Density = 104.33 pcf

Average Unconfined Compressive Strength

_= 2,667.56 psf
st Project
na Lindstrom
1499631
4/10/2017

No. 1 Cement seal

Distance (ft)
0-75'
0-55'
0-55'
0-55'
0-56.5'
0-75'
0-11'-6"

lassification
n Clay (CL)
d Gravel (SM or SP-SM)
d Sand (GP-GM or GW-GM)
lay (CL)
and Gravel (SP-SM)
lay (CL)
 c c/2
140 4485 2242.5 105
135 2135 1067.5 102.25
130 2311.667 1155.833 102.6667
125 2736 1368 87.83333
120 2914 1457 107.5
 115 2170 1085 110.4
110 2375 1187.5 230
105 2775 1387.5
2737.708

1368.854

significant that are

the boring test was

Water Content vs. Elevation

140
135
130
125 SBR-1
120 SBR-2
SBR-3
Elevation (ft) 115
SBR-4
110
SBR-5
105
SBR-6
100
95
90
0 5 10 15 20 25

Water Content (%)

Dry Density vs. Elevation

SBR-1
Elevation (ft) SBR-2
SBR-3
SBR-4
SBR-5
SBR-6

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Dry Density (pcf)

 Unconfined Compressive Strength vs. Elevation

SBR-1
Elevation (ft) SBR-2
SBR-3
SBR-4
SBR-5
SBR-6

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Unconfined Compressive Strength (psf)

 SBR-1
SBR-2
SBR-3
SBR-4
SBR-5
SBR-6

20 25

SBR-1
SBR-2
SBR-3
SBR-4
SBR-5
SBR-6

120
ation

SBR-1
SBR-2
SBR-3
SBR-4
SBR-5
SBR-6

0 9000
 CE 164 FOUNDATION ENGINEERING Deep Foundation Design
Maddhu Thumaluru, Ph. D.,P.E. Cristina Lindstrom
Spring Semester 2017 11499631
Date: 3/3/2017

DEEP FOUNDATION DESIGN

Drilled Straight Shaft

Axial Capacity in Soil

Interior Columns
Maximum Dead plus Live Loads: Factor of Safety:
Qmax= 150 kips 150,000 lbs F.S.= 2

Ultimate Axial Capacity (Qult) of the drilled shaft:for compression and uploft loading, resp

Soil Properties:
Effective Friction Angle: Cohesion: Dry density of soil:
= 0 c'= 1333.778 psf = 104.33
Diameter= 1 ft Length= 30 ft

drys density
Elevation cohesion
of soil

135 2242.5
130 1067.5
125 1155.833
120 1368
115 1457
110 1085
105 1187.5

Side Resistance in Cohesive Soil:

= 0.55
fsi= 5.5
c= 1333.778
Sui= 1333.778
 checking <5500
733.58 5500 ok

_= 30 5 1
24

= 1 0.55 1333.77778 24

55310.59

End Bearing Capacity

QE= 0

Ultimate Capacity
_=_+ _-W
55310.59 lbs

Q allowable
_=_/(..) 55310.59
2

= 27,655 150,000

Checking that Allowable <Ultimate

 _ _

Settlement

Driven Pile
 ndation Design
na Lindstrom
1499631
3/3/2017

uploft loading, respectively:

pcf