Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Directions: Below you will find the three anchor questions for your discussions. Prepare arguments and
evidence for at least two to use to support your position and discredit counter-arguments.
1. How much of the technology from 1984 became a reality in our world today? Could what we
have be used to monitor us? To what extent should we use our technology for surveillance and
safety? At what point does it go too far and we enter the world of Big Brother?
Argument Evidence Counter-Argument Rebuttal
2. What is the nature of reality? Could any government decide what is real and what is not? Is it
possible for a governing entity to control the thoughts of its citizens so thoroughly? Is it possible to
have scientific progress with this definition of truth?
Argument Evidence Counter-Argument Rebuttal
3. What type of government works best? Is it better to have a top down monarchy government, led
by a single king or powerful leader(Big Brother)? A council (Inner Party) led country, such as an
aristocracy or oligarchy? Or a democratic/republic government, where the government is led by by the
masses? What are the downsides of each?
Argument Evidence Counter-Argument Rebuttal
Directions: Using the sentences frames given, come up with at least five furthering questions that you
can ask during the Socratic seminar.
Im confused about the different kinds of governments and the pros and cons to each
Dont you think this is similar to communist Russia and other totalitarian governments
Do you agree that if we cant prove that anything happens outside our minds that there is no such
thing as external reality
While I see what you are saying, have you considered that an oppressive government might be
good?
Do you think that people should do what theyre told or should they question everything
Do you agree/disagree that there is no evidence to support the idea of external reality
Directions: During the seminar, use this section to take notes on what others say and jot down ideas.
These can be used in your discussion or later in your paper.