Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
10
2
The gross intra-oral appearance was disfiguring The excision of this lesion was followed by
and masticatory activity and phonation were recurrence to the original size in less than six months
impaired. The clinical impression was that of a (Case 1, Table 3). For a 34 year old patient with
malignant neoplasm such as a fibrosarcoma or fibrous dysplasia, recurrence following excision of
carcinoma of the maxillary antrum. the lesion is not expected, as has always been
An occipitomental radiograph revealed complete previously reported.
opacification of the right maxillary antrum (Fig. 5),
suggestive of a space-occupying lesion in the right Discussion
maxillary sinus. Because of the similarity between fibrous
Histologically, the gross appearance of the dysplasia and ossifying fibroma at a histological
submitted specimen consisted of five irregular level, the diagnosis of each of these fibro-osseous
portions of firm, tan tissue, some of which were lesions continues to be a problem. For this reason
partially covered by mucosa. On sectioning, each one can correctly say that the X-ray studies are
revealed a firm, cream cut surface. indispensable for the interpretation of fibro-osseous
Sections showed a portion of a lesion consisting of lesions of the jaw, and more particularly in the
irregularly shaped spicules of woven bone dispersed differentiation between fibrous dysplasia and ossifying
in a background of compact, collagenous fibrous fibroma, which is virtually impossible on the basis of
tissue (Fig. 7a, b). Osteoblastic rimming of the bony histopathology alone.
spicules was not evident. Some sections were Monostotic fibrous dysplasia is characterized by a
partially covered by stratified squamous, non- swelling resulting from a poorly circumscribed area
keratinizing epithelium, which was focally ulcerated of fibro-osseous proliferation. Prior to 1970, fibrous
and associated with areas of haemorrhage and a dysplasia was used as an all-inclusive term that
heavy chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate within the encompassed both monostotic and polyostotic
subjacent fibrous stroma. The overall histologic forms of fibrous dysplasia and a variety of other
features were those of fibrous dysplasia with fibro-osseous lesions, notably ossifying fibroma,
ulceration and infection. fibrous osteoma and osteoblastoma.4 Recently, the
term fibro-osseous lesion has been frequently used There is clinical evidence which indicates that local
for disorders ranging from fibrous dysplasia to the infection or trauma may eventuate in the disease
circumscribed lesions of ossifying or cementifying under yet unrecognized conditions,1 and this may be
fibroma and cemental dysplasia. More recently, the the cause in Case 14. Despite the similarity in
WHO classification of fibro-osseous lesion has nomenclature and histologic appearance, the mono-
recognized these conditions as distinct entities. stotic fibrous dysplasia is not necessarily related to
Monostotic fibrous dysplasia starts in childhood the polyostatic form and the former does not
but typically undergoes increasing ossification and necessarily progress into the latter.
subsequent arrest in adulthood. It is clinically seen
mainly in young persons, usually in their 20s, as a Conclusion
painless, smoothly rounded swelling, usually in the The clinicopathological aspect of the 15 new cases
maxilla. In this study of 15 new cases in Jamaica, of fibrous dysplasia in this series differs from what
this was found not to be so, as the majority (10 has been previously documented. It is also very
cases) presented initially after the age of 20 years surprising to find recurrence at the age of 34 years.
and, more surprisingly, two cases presented at the For these reasons, there is a need for further study of
age of 47 years. The authors are very certain that new cases in Jamaica.
pain from a rapidly growing swelling which was not
previously present (confirmed by the referring References
dentist) was the presenting complaint of Case 14 1. Schlumberger HG. Fibrous dysplasia (ossifying fibroma) of the
who was seen in late 1994. Because of the atypical maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthodont Oral Surg 1946;32:579-87.
clinical behaviour of fibrous dysplasia in Jamaica, as 2. Neville BW, Damn DD, Allen CM, Bunquot JE. Oral and
maxillofacial pathology. 1st edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
documented by findings from this series of 15 new 1995:460-9.
cases, further study on the clinicopathologic aspect 3. Ogunsalu CO. A study of tumours of the jaw bones in Jamaica with
of the disease is necessary. special emphasis on radiology. London: University of London,
1995. MSc thesis.
The mean age of occurrence in the 69 patients 4. Lynch MA, Brightman VJ, Greenberg MS, eds. Burkets oral
reported by Zimmerman and his associates5 was 27 medicine: diagnosis and treatment. 8th edn. Philadelphia:
years, while in the 53 patients with craniofacial Lippincott, 1984:327-9.
fibrous dysplasia reported by Gardner and Halpert, 5. Zimmerman DC, Dahlin DC, Stafne EC. Fibrous dysplasia of the
mandible and maxilla. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
the mean age was 34 years,6 both of which are higher 1958;11:55-68.
than the mean age of 25.7 years for 15 patients 6. Gardner AF, Halpert L. Fibrous dysplasia of the skull with special
reported in the present study. reference to the oral regions. D Practitioner D Record
1963;13:337-40.
The aetiology of monostotic fibrous dysplasia is
unknown. Although a variety of possible factors has
been suggested, none has found general acceptance. Address for correspondence/reprints:
Mr Christopher Ogunsalu,
Cornwall Dental Centre,
The word new has been used for the 15 cases of fibrous dysplasia to 42 Market Street,
distinguish them from the two cases of recurrent fibrous dysplasia also
recorded. Montego Bay, Jamaica.