1

Right to Information Application Original 3/06/2017

CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION (CVC)

Satarkata Bhavan , A- Block. GPO Complex ,
INA. New Delhi - 110 023

Re: Seeking information as per Right to Information Act,2005

Involving :- (a). CVC (b). The New India Assurance Co. Ltd (NIACL) (c). Central
Information Commission (CIC)

1). Information of Status of OM Reference No. Conf/1463/08 /9639 issued by

CVC to NIACL dated 29/04/2008

(a). 1) stands withdrawn, consequent to reply of Mrs. Gopa Ray CVO,NIACL

dated 19 Janurary 2009 as mentioned in page No.3 ,S. No.6 of this RTI

(b). the status of above (1) remains as it is.

Regards, RTI fee is paid herewith by way of enclosed IPO by the applicant.

Shrigopal Soni (RTI applicant)

C231,Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004
https://twitter.com/revribhav Cell No. 91-9414982395

1. Central Information Commissioner (CIC) hearing respondent is

6/01/2017 New India Assurance Co. Ltd (NIACL).
Case No. Date of Decision : 30 January 2017
CIC/MP/A/2016 RTI application of applicant 9/07/2015
/000371 Respondent present during hearing:- Deputy Manager, NIACL,
Jaipur RO , He is not the CPIO of NIACL,CIC permits his presence.
Argument for denial of information:-

30/01/2017 Order for disclosure to applicant a tiny fraction of information is

issued by Mrs. Manjula Parasher on behalf of CIC

***14/02/2017 CPIO, NIACL supplies a copy of compliance to the CIC (please see
last para of page no.3) on wrong pin code to the applicant.

Relevant history to the present RTI application

2. 2006-07 Applicants article on RTI is published by NIACL Jaipur magazine
3. Even before the process of domestic enquiry the applicants
12/06/ misconduct is spread as propaganda in the C I C by NIACL ignoring the
2008 CVC directions of April 2008 as per S. No.5 of this RTI
 2

Nature of so called misconduct of the applicant:-

The act of Mr. ShriGopal Soni leaving headquarters repeatedly
without permission of comeptent authority amounts to his gross
(grave) violation of the Company rules which is not expected from a
public servant (company personnel) .
It is clear from the aforesaid that Mr. Soni did not observe honesty
& integrity to his duties and he acted against the image of a public
servant & under prejudice to the interests of the Company and thus
violated rules 3(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) & committed misonduct under Rules
4(1),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(16),(17),(20) & Rule 18(1) & Rule 19 of
General Insurance Conduct Discipline & Appeal Rules,1975.
Date:13.02.2008 Place: Jaipur (B. P. Yadav) Manager

4. Ethics applicable to NIACL officials stipulate the following:-

12.10. The Book of Dos and Donts List of Donts:-DO NOT:-
1999 Be arbitrary or capricious in your decisions, your decisions
should be justifiable and based on sound reasons.

5. CVC the appropriate nodal agency issues written directions

29.04. to NIACL to ensure that the applicant is not harassed in any
2008 manner.(OM Reference No. Conf/1463/08 /9639)

6. questions To moral Credibility of the CVO of NIACL

19.12.
2011

No existence of designation of hindi translators in the

NIACL,since 2006, reveals above RTI Information
Abuse of chief vigilance officer,inter alia, for giving
19/01
fake information ; Mrs. Gopa Ray ,GM-CVO {Chief
/2009 Vigilance Officer}, NIACL, writes to CVC .
CVO NIACL stresses the specialized status of applicant
a Hindi Translator 3 times.
 3

7.
27/06/ A R Sekar NIACLs senior most General Managers order to
applicant : applicants RTI transferred by The NHRC {National
2009
Human Rights Commission} :
It (seeking access to information under RTI) is a crude
attempt to confuse the different authorities and an
attempt to escape from the due process of law

8. Corruption in NIACL Jaipur News published in newspapers.

11.02. One employee caught taking bribe in the course of his duties
of NIACL, Jaipur; enjoyed full pay during so called inquiry, he
2009
was never subjected to suspension even for one day.
NIACLs Head Office Vigilance Officials RTI reply :-
applicant has expressed his opinion about state of
corruption in its confirmation asked information about
third party, hence denied.
The ethics is that even an exempted body, e.g. CBI cannot deny
info of corruption of employees.
Annexures:-
Page no. 4 29/04/2016 CVC to NIACL directions not to harass
applicant
Page No. 5 19/01/2016 GOPA Ray ,CVO NIACL to CVC
Page No. 6 2007-08 CVO is appreciated for her values and ethics
4
5
6