Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BY
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL
ENGINEERING
JUNE, 2010
i
FRYING MACHINE
BY
JUNE, 2010
ii
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that this project report entitled, HEAT AND MASS
TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF A GARI FRYING MACHINE is a research
work carried out by Mr. Nwankpa Godwin Uchenna, a postgraduate student
in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nigeria
Nsukka.
-------------------------------- ---------------------------
STUDENT Prof. S.O. Enibe
Nwankpa Godwin Uchenna SUPERVISOR
--------------------------------- ------------------------------
HEAD OF DEPARTMENT EXTERNAL EXAMINER
Engr. Prof. S.O. Onyegegbu
iii
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
For his advice, guidance and patience throughout the duration of the project.
Engr. B. Iteke,
For his assistance in getting the gari frying machine ready and also in seeing
that all the measuring instruments were made ready for the experiment
Awhum Monastery,
the experimentation.
Dad (Mr. N.O. Nwankpa), brothers, sisters, friends, typist and youths of
ABSTRACT
An experimental and theoretical study of the heat and mass transfer process
in the gari frying chamber of an existing gari frying machine was
undertaken. Cassava tubers were peeled, grated, fermented and dewatered to
make the dough ready for frying. During frying, the temperature readings of
the trough, walls, atmosphere, flue gas, flame from the burner and gari were
taken at different positions and time interval. Also theoretical analysis was
carried out in which the numerical solution was obtained by MATLAB
BVP4C code. The experimental results obtained were compared with the
theoretical results. The experimental results showed three noticeable stages
along the trough. The first was the cooking stage where the temperature rose
and came down sharply as a result of temperature distribution of the flame of
the burner. The second was the mass transfer stage where the temperature on
the trough remained constant. And finally the third stage where drying took
place and the temperature rose a little before dropping. For a frying rate of
54kg/hr and fuel consumption of 5 litres per hour, it was found that the
useful efficiency was about 24% while the overall efficiency of the machine
was 85%.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATION ----------------------------------------- II
DEDICATION ----------------------------------------- III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT --------------------------------------- IV
ABSTRACT ----------------------------------------- V
TABLE OF CONTENTS ---------------------------------------- VI
LIST OF FIGURES ---------------------------------------- VIII
LIST OF TABLES ---------------------------------------- XI
INTERPRETATION OF SYMBOLS ------------------------- XII
CHAPTER ONE: LITERATURE REVIEW --------------- 1
1.1 Introduction ------------------------------ 1
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Literature Review ------------------------------ 6
2.2 Mechanized Methods ------------------------------- 12
2.3 Discussion and Conclusion ------------------------ 18
2.4 Objectives -------------------------------------- 21
CHAPTER THREE: EXPERIMENTATION ---------------- 22
3.1 Preparation of Dough ------------------------- 22
3.2 Materials ---------------------------------------- 24
3.2.1 Cassava ---------------------------------------- 24
3.2.2 Fuel ---------------------------------------- 26
3.2.3 Diesel Burner -------------------------------- 27
3.2.4 Trough ---------------------------------------- 28
3.2.5 Combustion Chamber ------------------------ 28
3.2.6 Chimney --------------------------------------- 28
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
EXPERIMENT 36
FIGURE 3.11 PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN DURING FRYING OF GARI 37
FIGURE 3.12 COMBINED GRAPH OF EXPERIMENTAL FLUE GAS AND
PLATE TEMPERATURES. 41
FIGURE 3.13 THE GRAPH OF EXPERIMENTAL FLUE GAS AGAINST
MACHINE LENGTH. 42
FIGURE 3. 14 THE GRAPH OF EXPERIMENTAL PLATE TEMPERATURE
AGAINST MACHINE LENGTH. 43
FIGURE 4.1 DRAWING 1 OF THE GARI FRYING MACHINE SHOWING
THE PARTS OF THE MACHINE. 44
FIGURE 4.2 DRAWING 2 OF THE GARI FRYING MACHINE WITH BASIC
DIMENSION. 45
FIGURE 4.3 THE DRAWING OF THE FRYING TROUGH 45
FIGURE 4.4 DRAWING OF THE TROUGH SHOWING THE DOUGH INSIDE
AND THE FLUE GAS BELOW THE TROUGH 46
FIGURE 4.5 CROSS-SECTION OF THE GARI FRYING MACHINE 46
FIGURE 4.6 ENERGY BALANCE OF COMBUSTION CHAMBER AND
FRYING TROUGH. 47
FIGURE 4.7 ENERGY BALANCE OF THE FRYING TROUGH 48
FIGURE 4.8 ENERGY BALANCE OF THE FRYING TROUGH 48
FIGURE 4.9 HEAT FLUXES ON A DIFFERENTIAL ELEMENT OF THE FLUE
GAS 51
FIGURE 4.10 ENERGY BALANCE OF A DIFFERENTIAL ELEMENT OF THE
FRYING TROUGH. 53
FIGURE 4.11 MASS BALANCE FOR THE GRANULES 56
FIGURE 4.12 ENERGY BALANCE ON DIFFERENTIAL ELEMENT OF THE
DOUGH GRANULES. 57
FIGURE 5.1 GRAPHICAL SOLUTION OF THE THEORETICAL ANALYSIS 95
FIGURE 5.2 GRAPH OF THEORETICAL FLUE GAS TEMPERATURE
AGAINST MACHINE LENGTH. 96
x
LIST OF TABLES
THE TROUGH. 64
xii
NOTATIONS
Rh = Relative humidity
SO2 = Sulphur dioxide
Tad = Adiabatic temperature (oC)
Tboil = Boiling temperature of the moist in the dough (K)
Td = Dough temperature (oC)
Tf = Flue gas temperature oC
Tfg = Temperature of the flue gas (oC)
Tfg = Temperature of the flue gas (K)
Tgari = Temperature of gari (K)
Tp = Plate temperature (oC)
tp = Thickness of the plate (m)
Ttr = Temperature of trough (plate) (oC)
Uda = Heat transfer coefficient between the dough and air (W/m2K)
Ufp = Heat transfer coefficient between the flue gas and the plate (W/m2K)
Upd = Heat transfer coefficient between the plate and the dough (W/m2K)
V = Velocity (m/s)
Ya = Solution at y = O
Yb = Solution at y = 1
x = Increment in x-axis (m)
y = Increment in y-axis
1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
energy sources in the human diet in the tropics. The estimated annual
Nigeria accounting for over 70% of the output from West Africa. It is
2000. Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean accounted for 54,
28 and 19 per cent of the total world production respectively. The average
yield in 2000 was 10.2 tonnes per hectare, but this varied from 1.8 tonnes
per hectare in Sudan, to 10.6 tonnes per hectare in Nigeria, and 27.3 tonnes
making it the world's largest producer. Figure 1.1 shows young cassava
plants in a farm, while figure 1.2 shows freshly harvested cassava tubers.
Fresh cassava has a very short post-harvest storage life, and it must be
used or processed into durable forms soon after harvest (Ayernor, 1981)
Among all the above mentioned products of cassava, gari is the most
common and forms the main meal of the day for majority of people in West
fig 1.3
PEELING
WASHING
GRATING
FERMENTING
DEWATERING
SIEVING
FRYING
GARI
Figure 1.3 Flow Sheet of Gari Production Starting with Raw Cassava Root.
One major bottleneck in gari processing has been gari frying. Gari
frying involves pressing, scraping and stirring of sifted cassava mash over a
hot plate at 120 to 200oC in a repetitive manner. Heat transfer from the hot
5
plate results in the toasting of the gari particles, while starch pressed out
from the granules coats the gari particles and is partially gelatinized to form
a tin enveloping film. Odigboh (1982) has termed this process garification
to emphasize the fact that gari frying involves more than mere high
temperature drying.
Attention has been only focused on machine design, fabrication and testing
fryer. It is made of a fireplace oven with a chimney and a frying pan. The
shape with its sides inclined at 60o to the horizontal. The inclination of the
sides allows for gradual gravitation flow of gari down the sides of the fryer.
It is made from a 4 inches thick black steel sheet, which is not easily
corroded and does not turn black after heating. The frying pan has an
opening or chute on one side for discharging the finished product into a
receiving pan. The frying pan sits on a rectangular fireplace built of clay
which is 60cm high and has an opening on one side of the breath or width
from where fire wood is fed into the oven, while the other width carries the
chimney. There are two small ventilation openings on one side of the length.
The wall thickness of the fireplace is 22.5cm and the effective volume of the
source of heat. The structure is housed under a shed made of corrugated iron
sheets.
7
The fryer is operated by two people sitting on both ends of the fireplace
(1987). Fields tests amongst gari producers showed that the improved
improved fireplace.
8
c) The capacity and rate of frying were increased. (e.g. 5kg dewatered
oven. This is illustrated in figure 2.2. The frying pan is circular, made of cast
iron and is smaller than the normal traditional pan in diameter but has more
depth. The pan sits on a circular oven which has a chimney and can use
smoke and heat hazards from the operator. As a result of the elevated
fireplace, the sitting position and comfort of the operator are enhanced. The
capacity of the fryer is much higher than the usual traditional fryer.
the UI model and is rectangular in shape. The frying pan is made from cast
iron which sits on an elevated oven fireplace with a chimney. It has outlet
gates or spouts for discharging the finished products from the pan and is
The RAIDS model has been found to increase output per unit time and
eliminate smoke and heat discomfort to the operators. The model produces
and two high yield improved cultivars (TMS 30572 and NR 8082) were
used for the study. The specific heat capacity obtained ranged from 1.40
to 1.45 KJ/Kg K and for bone dry fermented ground cassava. The
Nigeria
They buy the fresh roots and hire the grater, presser and fryers necessary for
the semi-mechanized procedure. The need for a rapid turnover of capital can
high residual amounts of cyanogens in gari and hence, with dietary cyanide
exposure. The processors are liable to eat a lot of cassava products, and they
controls from the same social group the level was 506 M. These
processed cassava consumed, but the high levels seen in the children, who
also had the longest working hours, suggests that inhalation exposure may
requirements in gari frying. In their work a two-year study (1994 and 1995)
mixture of wood and palm kernel shell (wood + PKS) and charcoal) were
used, while for the 1995 study, two additional fuel sources (kerosene and
measurements. The study revealed that wood + PKS required more human
energy (7.73 and 5.77 KJ/minute in 1994 and 1995, respectively) while
wood (3.08 KJ/minute) and kerosene (1.66 KJ/minute) required the least.
Charcoal (N7.70) and gas (N15.51) fuel were the most costly in producing a
unit weight of gari in 1994 and 1995, respectively, while wood + PKS gave
the least cost (N0.87 and N1.26) in both years. Wood and gas fuel sources
produced the highest frying rate (8.69 and 8.66 kg/h) in 1994 and 1995,
respectively, while charcoal and kerosene indicated the least (6.34 and 0.95
a lethal level) in the subjects' body temperatures, heart rate and blood
pressure after frying. The studies suggest that gari frying is a light grade of
work and that fuel wood seems most appropriate in terms of cost
effectiveness.
market which have been found to be performing well as regards the quality
of gari. As a result, some new designs and improvements have been made by
jointly by the Newell Dunford Company in London and the Federal Institute
In the Newell Dunford model, the frying section gets heat from a gas
process. The fryer structure is a circular stainless steel, heated from outside
with the fryers curve linearly lined internally. The fryer containing the
sieved dewatered cassava mash is rotated in such a manner that the mash
granules agitate against the sides of the fryer and move along the paths of
the line curves. The result of this type of heat treatment is roasting. The
product obtained with this model was not very much acceptable to the
operates on a hatch process drying. Atop the plate is a large ring gear
steel paddles. A specific batch of sieved cassava mash is dropped into the
circular plate and the eccentric paddles shift the mass circularly to produce a
dry product. An automatic gate is opened at the side of the plate and the
than the Newell Dunford model and the product obtained from it is similar to
gari in Nigeria, even though it is not exactly the same. In this model, frying
was not evenly spread within a given batch and the product looked more like
semi-circular steel plate with rotating paddles. The paddles are eccentrically
located in such a manner that their motion compels the gari granules to move
from one end of the plate to the other. Drying occurs during this period. Heat
product was not cooked but looked more like roasted gari. This model has
University of Ibadan.
diesel burners.
15
shaft also mounted axially in such a way as to locate the paddles inside and
in permanent contact with the trough as shown in Figures 1.6 and 1.7. The
paddles overlap and are angled relative to the axis of the trough to act as a
sort of conveyor. They are driven by an electric motor through several speed
metered into the trough, once in a cycle of the to and fro motion. Swinging
to one direction, the paddles press the mash against the hot surface of the
trough while in the opposite direction, they scrape, stir and move it slightly
mash metered and the heating rate, the fryer operates automatically to
average through-put of 66kg of gari per hour has been reported for this
The basic differences are in the feeding device, the heat source and
and an oven on which the fryer sits . This model is still in its prototype stage
The fryer plate, like in the UNN model, is a semi-circular trough open
at the top and both ends. It is inclined at an angle of between 5 and 18o with
18
device which is one of the basic innovations in the design. The metering
device is connected to the central shaft through a belt and pulley system and
the rate of metering is very crucial to the quality of the final product.
in the UNN model, the central shaft has 28 paddles and pulverizers arranged
in such a way that they have a conveyor effect at the same time as they press
scoop and agitate (figure 2.3). The pulverizers press the sieved cassava mash
against the hot pan surface while the paddles scoop and agitate it. The oven
is built with red oven-dry bricks and has air vents at specific points and uses
according to the heat requirements. Power supply to the fryer could be either
Field tests using this model showed that the final product was
product.
understanding of the factors that affect the quality of the final product.
19
The best quality gari is obtained by the village technique but it is time
consuming, uncomfortable and lends itself to health hazard for the operator.
requirements:
moderate capacity.
Mechanized fryers are not within the reach of the rural farmers who are
developed prototypes by the universities which could have been within the
scale processing without losing sight of improving the village method. The
frying. The factors investigated were the comfort, fatigue and arm-reach of
traditional gari fryers. It was found that the sitting posture and excessive heat
were the two main factors that affected the arm-reach and comfort of the
operator, respectively. Improved designs that reduced heat and changed the
performed relatively well, the best results were obtained from the improved
status of the users. The improved village technique is recommended for the
2.4 OBJECTIVES
operation but one which requires understanding of the factors that affect the
quality of the final product. Consequently the objectives of this work are:
trough.
22
and the pulp is grated in a gari grinding machine. The grated produce is then
put into a jute sack and the sack tied. This is dewatered and left to ferment
for three to seven days depending on the type of gari being produced. This
23
Fig 3.2 Photograph Showing Stacks of Gari Sacks being Dewatered in Beach Junction Gari
processing village
While inside the sack, sacks are stacked up on each and a wooden
board placed below and above the sacks as shown in figure 3.2. The wooden
boards are tied together with the sacks full of the grated cassava in between.
24
Tension is created by tightening the rope and thus allowing water to run out
Usually, by day three, the grated cassava would have lost quite some
water and become reasonably dried. This step is also being by-passed with
the use of machines that compress and squeeze water out of the grated
cassava.
large particles and fibres and the smaller grain-like bits are collected for
further processing. At this stage, grain-like bits are now ready for frying.
3.2 MATERIALS
3.2.1 CASSAVA
products. Each component of the plant can be of value to its cultivator. The
propagation and grafting. The roots are typically processed for human
areas of Central and South America, cassava arrived on the west coast of
25
Africa at the end of the sixteenth century and then spread inland across the
continent.
It can grow on marginal lands where cereals and other crops do not
grow well.
accepted in both rural and urban areas. It can be consumed without any
groundnut, fish, meat and stew. Cassava is the main material used in
preparing gari
in 2001 in Nigeria. Ten percent was used as chips in animal feed, 5 percent
was processed into a syrup concentrate for soft drinks and less than one
percent was processed into high quality cassava flour used in biscuits and
for food consumption, and this is the main material used in preparing gari
3.2.2 FUEL
distilling over the range of 150 to 400oC (300 to 750oF). The carbon number
and flash point are directly attributable to both the carbon number and the
fuel by pump pressure only. Air supplied by the fan is split into primary and
secondary streams by the use of a swirler and a flame holder. The flame
holder is conical in shape. The burner produced heat which was channeled
3.2.4 TROUGH
circular form; heat gets to the gari through conduction from the steel trough.
It is too thin that we assumed that there is no temperature variation from the
bottom to the top. The dimension of the trough used is 360cm by 160cm,
throughout the frying process; the brick walls help in reducing heat losses
from the chamber. The burner is positioned at one end of the width of the
chamber. There exists also an opening at the opposite end of the chamber
where the flue gas leaves the chamber. The heating chamber is 360cm long,
3.2.6 CHIMNEY
The chimney is used for the exit of the hot gases from the heating
chamber. When the gases are heated, they become lighter and rise up the
chimney, drawing cold air beneath them. The higher the chimney height the
greater is the draught, if the heating chamber gases are hotter. The chimney
29
used has a height of 450cm and of 58cm square cross section. It is made up
of steel at the top and bricks one-fifth of the length from the ground.
Fig 3.4 Cassava Grinding Machine in Beach junction Gari Processing Village (Nsukka)
The grinding machine was used to grind the peeled cassava into pulp.
This sieve was used to separate the dried pulp into smaller sizes. The
larger particles are disposed of while the smaller sizes are re-introduced into
3.2.10 PADDLES
These are metals attached to a long shaft positioned at the centre along
the trough. They are used for scraping, spraying and pressing the gari on the
hot plate. They are also responsible for the motion of the dough from the
point the dough was introduced to the point of exit of the gari.
33
This is the machine that produces the motion of the shaft where the
paddles were attached. The electric motor is connected to the shaft through a
belt. The shaft rests on a ball bearing at both ends of the trough for free
movement.
34
Fig 3..9 Photograph Taken During the Connection of the Electric Motor and the Burner Switches of Power Source
Through the help of these switches, the burner and the electric motor
are put on and off as the need arises. The two have different switches, the
switch for the burner is used to turn helps to off the burner when the
temperature gets too high while the electric motor remains on.
35
The measuring tape was used to take the dimensions of the heating
chamber, chimney and frying trough, while the trough thickness was
points on the trough. They were also used to measure other parameters like
temperature and gari temperature before and after frying. The specifications
This was used in weighing the dough before and after frying. It was
also used in weighing the cassava tubers before and after peeling. The
ground cassava was also weighed with this instrument before and after
dewatering.
36
The side of the square hole where the burner supplies the flame = 0.23m
Table 3.1: Flue Gas Temperature Readings along the Length of the
Table 3.2: Plate Temperature Readings Along the Length of the Trough
in 20 Minutes Interval
GRAPHS
400
experimental flue gas and plate temperatures (oC)
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
Length of trough??
fig 3.12 Combined Graph of Experimental Flue Gas and Plate Temperatures (flue gas: yellow line
At the initial stage the temperature rose, this was as a result of much
heat required for cooking. At the middle of the graph we have almost
constant temperature this was the stage where there was vaporization of
moisture from the gari (change of state). At the end of the graph we have the
400
350
experimental flue gas temperature[0C]
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
Fig. 3.13 Graph of Experimental Flue Gas Temperature Against Machine Length
43
180
170
160
experimental plate temperature[0C]
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
Chimney
Cover
Trough
Fig 4.1 Drawing 1 of the Gari Frying Machine Showing the Parts of the Machine
45
0.77m
1.26m
3.6m
Fig 4.2 Drawing 2 of Gari Frying Machine with Dimension
Fig 4.4 Drawing of the Trough Showing the Dough Inside and the Flue Gas Below the
Trough
gasses at the adiabatic flame temperature, Tad as shown in figure 3.5. These
hot gasses then heat the frying trough, with all the other processes taking
place. We also assumed that heat loss through the walls is negligible.
Dough feeding
Combustion
Q fuel
Chamber Q flame
Q air
Frying Q gari
Q dough
Q drying
Trough
Q flue gas
Q flame
To simplify the equation, let us assume that the rate of energy storage
in the system is negligible compared with the other energy flows. In that
o
Q dough = M dough CP dough T dough (4.3)
o
Where M dough = mass of dough (kg)
o
Q flame = M fg CP flame Tad (4.4)
o
Where M fg = mass of flue gas (kg)
o
Q drying = M vap [CP dough (Tboil T dough) + hfg ] (4.5)
o
Where M Vap = mass of moisture removed from dough (kg)
o
Q flue gas = M fg CP fg Tfg (4.6)
o
M fg = mass of flue gas (kg)
o
Q gari = M gari CPgari Tgari (4.7)
o
Where M gari = mass of the gari (kg)
y y + y
The combustion gases exchange heat with the trough of width btr .
o dT fg dC P fg
M fg [CPfg x T fg x ] (4.11)
dx dx
Now for the temperature range under consideration, the specific heat may be
Thus,
o
Qfg = M fg Tfg (afg + bfg Tfg) (4.13)
o
i.e. Qfg = M fg (afg Tfg + bfg T2fg)
dQ fg
Qfg = x (4.14)
dx
dQ fg o dT fg
But M fg
dx dx
dTdy
o
M fg a fg 2b fgT fg
fg
y
htr btr Ttr T fg y (4.15)
Hence
Boundary Condition
53
fin.
below.
Qp-d
bp
Qp
Qp + Qp
y Qf-p
Flow of
flue gas
Q p d = heat transfer from the plate to the (dough) gari being fried.
Qp + Qfp = Qp + Qp + Qpd
Q fp Q p Q pd (4.18)
dTp
Qp = -kp bp tp (4.19)
dy
bp = plate width
tp = plate thickness
dQp d 2Tp
Qp = y k pbpt p y (4.20)
dy dy2
And Upd is the heat exchange coefficient between the hot plate and the gari
being fried.
Substituting equations (4.20), (4.21) and (4.22) into equation (4.18), we have
d 2Tp
Ufp bp y (Tf Tp) = kp bp tp y Upd bp y Tp Td
dy 2
d 2Tp (4.23)
k pt p 2
Upd Tp Td U fp T f Tp
dy
55
Boundary Conditions
negligible.
Hence
dTp
O @ y O (4.24)
dy
dTp
O@ y L (4.25)
dy
each section of the frying trough. As pointed out by Odigboh (1983), the
action of pressing, scraping and sifting of cassava mash over a hot plate
heat and mass transfer, as well as some biochemical changes of the cassava
constant size.
4. The granules are well mixed during processing. Thus, the dough is
Heat and mass balance on a differential element of the dough across the
o
M m (vap)
o
Md o
Md
o o o
Mm M m M m (l)
the dry cassava remains unchanged, while the moisture flow rate has
o o o
reduced to M m - M m with the evaporation of quantity M m .
o
M d CPd Td o
M d CPd Td Td
o
M m hf o o
M m M hf
o
According to Chia-Chung Chen (1990) M m can be expressed using
RH = relative humidity
T=temperature
dTd btr U pd Tp Td U da Td Ta 9.8650h fg
(4.30)
dy o
m d Cpd 0.0627 h fg
dT fg htr btr Tp TF
o
(4.31) flue gas equation
dy m fg agh 2b fg T fg
d 2Tp U pd Tp Td U fp T f Tp
2
(4.32) plate equation
dy kptp
59
dTd bp U pd Tp Td U da Td Ta 9.8650h fg
(4.33) dough equation
dy o
m d C p d 0.0627 h fg
With the following conditions
dTp
(0) O
(4.35)
dy
dTp
(1) O (4.36)
dy
Td (0) 40 o C
(4.37)
The first step in solving this set of equations is to write the second order
Tp 2 Tp 1 ..................................(3.39)
1
TP1 Tp 2 ..............................................(3.40)
1
TP2
U Pd TP1 Td U fp T f TP1 (3.41)
kptp
We now have,
60
1 U fp b p T p T f
Tf o
....................................(3.42)
m fg a fg 2b fg T fg
1
TP1 TP2 ........................................(3.43)
1
TP2
U Pd
TP1 Td U fp T f TP1 ..................................(3.44)
kptp
1
Td
b p U pd T p Td U da Td Ta 9.8650hfg. .......................(3.45)
o
m d Cp d 0.06267 hfg
Tp1 = T (2), Tp2 = T (3) and Td = T (4) we now have the follow equations.
dT(1)
U fp b p T( 2) T(1) 3.46
o
m fg a fg 2b fg T(1)
dT (3)
U T pd ( 2)
T( 4) U da T( 4) Ta 9.8650hfg
3.48
o
m d Cp d 0.06267hfg
o
dT (1) U fp b p * T( 2) T(1) / m fg * a fg 2b fg * T(1)
dT (2) T (3)
61
dT (3) U Pd * T( 2) T( 4) U fP * T(1) T( 2 ) / kp * tp
o
dT (4) b p* U pd * T( 2) T( 4 ) U da * T( 4) Ta 9.8650 * hfg / m d * Cp d 0.06267 * hfg
ya (3) 200
yb (3) 120
yb (4) 85];
it has been set to 0, we try to supply conditions we have for the equations. The
fields that must be called x and y. A guess for a mesh that reveals the behavior
of the solution is provided as the vector solinit. x. A guess for the solution at
these mesh points is provided as the array solinit. y, with each column solinit.
y (:, i) approximating the solution at the point solinit. x(i). a helper function
62
bvpinit makes it easy to form a guess structure. It creates the structure when
given the mesh and a guess for the solution in the form of a constant vector or
MATLAB will solve a family of initial value problems, searching for one for
The output of bvp4c is a structure called here sol. The mesh determined
these mesh points is returned as sol. y. As with the guess, sol. y (:, i)
THEORETICAL RESULTS
sol=bvp4c(@nwankpa,@nwankpabc,sol);
sol.x
sol.y
ans =
Columns 1 through 7
Columns 8 through 10
ans =
1.0e+003 *
Columns 1 through 7
Columns 8 through 10
Table 4.1 Theoretical Flue Gas Temperatures Along the Length of Machine
Carbon Balance
0.863
b 0.071916667
12
Hydrogen Balance
Sulphur Balance
0.009
d d 0.00028125
32
Oxygen Balance
66
0.21 2a 2b C 2d
0.2083958
a 0.4961805
0.42
1kg diesel
3.33kg 02
10.98 kg N2
3.16kg C02
1.15kg H2O
0.018 kg SO2
10.98 kg N2
In Summary
Reactants Products
10.98 kg N2
The initial temperature of the reactants is 24oC and the value of Hp is the
H PTad
H R25 H 25 H R 25 H R24 O (5.2)
H R 25
H R24 mi cpi 25 24 (5.3)
The mean temperature of the reactants over the interval is 24.5oC. At this
H R25
H R24 16.27614kJkg 1 Diesel (5.5)
But H P H P micpiTad 25
Tad 25
(5.6)
+ (10.98CpN2)] (5.7)
42800 + 16.27614 = 0
(Tad 25) [(3.16Cpcp2) + (1.15CpH20) + (0.018CpS02) + (10.98CpN2)] = 42783.72
(5.8)
There should be an initial guess for the flame temperature in other to solve
1000 25
513.5 o C 513 o C
2
C02 = 1.1544
H20 = 2.12388
S02 = 1.090744
N2 = 1.11384
Energy equation is
Tad 253.16 1.1544 1.15 2.12388 0.018 1.090744 10.98 1.11384 42783.72
69
42783.72
Tad 25 23328728
18.3395
For the second iteration, the new mean temperature of the product is
2357.8728 25
1191.4364
2
Co2 = 1.321
H20 = 2.5885
So2 = 1.2073
N2 = 1.240
Tad 253.16 1.321 1.15 2.5885 0.018 1.2073 10.98 1.240 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2058.09
20.7881
Tad 2083o C
9th Iteration,
2113 25
1069o C
2
Co2 = 1.305
H20 = 2.515
So2 = 1.194
N2 = 1.225
Energy equation,
Tad 253.16 1.305 1.15 2.515 0.018 1.194 10.98 1.225 42783.72
42783 .72
Tad 25 2088 .228831
20.488042
Tad 2113 o C
:. The Adiabatic flame temperature is 21130C
71
Heat Energy
The release of heat energy is only the first stage in the heating
process. For this heat energy to be transmitted from one region to another,
Conduction
pass their excess energy onto atoms with less energy by collisions. In other
with low temperature. Conduction occurs mainly in solid where the mobility
applied directly. The driving force is the temperature difference per unit
72
of resistance to heat flow, its reciprocal called the conductance is used. This
that is:
where dQ/dt is the rate of heat transfer, the quantity of heat energy
transferred per unit of time, A is the area of cross-section of the heat flow
temperature per unit length of path, and k is the thermal conductivity of the
The units of k, the thermal conductivity, can be found from eqn. (5.9) by
Equation (5.8) is known as the Fourier equation for heat conduction. Heat
flows from a hotter to a colder body, which is in the direction of the negative
and the minus sign is considered to be confusing rather than helpful, so it has
Convection
than on theory.
Furthermore, since the laws of molecular transport govern both heat flow
and viscosity, convection heat transfer and fluid friction are closely related
Natural Convection
surface hotter or colder than itself. As the fluid is heated or cooled it changes
its density. This difference in density causes movement in the fluid that has
colder ambient air. It occurs when food is placed inside a chiller or freezer
when material is placed in ovens without fans and afterwards when the
It has been found that natural convection rates depend upon the physical
which for gases = l/T by Charles' Law. Other factors that also affect
can then write the most general equation for natural convection:
From the Nusselt number we can find hc and so determine the rate of
equations, the values of the physical constants of the fluid are taken at the
mean temperature between the surface and the bulk fluid. The Nusselt and
Biot numbers look similar: they differ in that for Nusselt, k and h both refer
These are related to a characteristic dimension of the body (food material for
(1) Natural convection about vertical cylinders and planes, such as vertical
hc = 1.3(T/L)0.25 (5.16)
hc = 1.8(T)0.25 (5.17)
Equations (5.16) and (5.17) are dimensional equations and are in standard
(Nu) = 0.54(Pr.Gr)0.25 for laminar flow in range 103 < (Pr.Gr) <
109. (5.18)
hc = 1.3(T/D)0.25 (5.19)
hc = 1.8(T)0.33 (5.20)
cooling
the plane instead of the diameter of the cylinder whenever D occurs in (Nu)
and (Gr). In the case of horizontal planes, cooled when facing upwards, or
convection circulation, it has been found that half of the value of hc in eqns.
must be in C and lengths in m and then hc will be in J m-2 s-1 C-1. Values
78
between the surface temperature and the temperature of the bulk liquid.
Forced Convection
When a fluid is forced past a solid body and heat is transferred between the
fluid and the body, this is called forced convection heat transfer. Examples
in the food industry are in the forced-convection ovens for baking bread,
The fluid is constantly being replaced, and the rates of heat transfer are,
therefore, higher than for natural convection. Also, as might be expected, the
higher the velocity of the fluid the higher the rate of heat transfer. In the case
and are grouped to deal with various commonly met situations such as fluids
(1) Heating and cooling inside tubes, generally fluid foods being pumped
through pipes
(Nu) = 4 (5.21)
and where turbulence is developed for (Re) > 2100 and (Pr) > 0.5
(Nu)=0.023(Re)0.8(Pr)0.4 (5.22)
For more viscous liquids, such as oils and syrups, the surface heat transfer
cooled. Under these cases, the viscosity effect can be allowed, for (Re) >
In both cases, the fluid properties are those of the bulk fluid except for s,
which is the viscosity of the fluid at the temperature of the tube surface.
80
Since (Pr) varies little for gases, either between gases or with temperature, it
can be taken as 0.75 and eqn. (5.22) simplifies for gases to:
In this equation the viscosity ratio is assumed to have no effect and all
quantities are evaluated at the bulk gas temperature. For other factors
meat or ice cream or slabs of cheese. For a plane surface, the problem of
choose for the Reynolds number. It has been found, however, that
experimental data correlate quite well if the length of the plate measured in
the direction of the flow is taken for D in the Reynolds number and the
For the flow of air over flat surfaces simplified equations are:
These again are dimensional equations and they apply only to smooth plates.
processing spaghetti.
Experimental data in this case have been correlated by the usual form of
equation:
The powers n and m vary with the Reynolds number. Values for D in (Re)
are again a difficulty and the diameter of the tube, over which the flow
occurs, is used. It should be noted that in this case the same values of (Re)
whereas for liquids at low Reynolds numbers, 1 < (Re) < 200:
equations are evaluated at the mean film temperature, which is the arithmetic
82
mean temperature between the temperature of the tube walls and the
and surface structures of the materials that are emitting or absorbing heat.
The calculation of radiant heat transfer rates, for most food processing
q = AT 4 (5.31)
+ 273).
This law gives the radiation emitted by a perfect radiator (a black body as
predicted by eqn. (5.31), but it has been found that many emit a constant
fraction of it. For these real bodies, including foods and equipment surfaces,
that emit a constant fraction of the radiation from a black body, the equation
can be rewritten
q = A T 4 (5.32)
number between 0 and 1. Bodies obeying this equation are called grey
bodies.
Emissivities vary with the temperature T and with the wavelength of the
approximately 1;
These values apply at the low and moderate temperatures which are those
For heat transfer coefficient between the plate and the dough (Upd), for
=100W/m2K.
To calculate the heat transfer coefficient between the dough and the air (Uda)
at Ta = 27oC,
62.5 27
Tf 44.75 45o C 318K
2
Pr = 0.70268
g = 9.8m/s2
1
= 0.00314465 k
318
L = 0.4667m
85
Raleigh No Ra = g
Ts T L3 Pr
2
1.74008 10 5 2
7.814437814 10 2
3.027878406 10 10
2.580829 108
Ra 2.580829 108
1
0.670 Ra 4
Nu 0.68
0.492 9 6
1 49
Pr
1
Nu 0.68
0.670 2.580829 10 8 4
0.492 9 6
1 49
0.70268
8.49209043 10
0.68
1.224952824
0.68 69.325857
Nu 70.005857
hc 4.1434 N / m 2 k
To calculate the heat transfer coefficient between the flue gas and plate
we use the relation by Treybal (1981) for flow of gas parallel to a surface and
hc = (0.11Re-0.29CpG)/Pr2/3
Re = Reynold,s number
Pr=Prandtl number
Cp = specific heat(J/kgK)
5.90G 0.71
hc =
de0.71
p 0.257 kg / m 3
G 3m / s 0.257
0.771kg | m 2 .s
0.71
0.77 1 4.90524
hc = 5.90 0.29
1.867 1.198482928
2
hc 4.092877704 N/m K
88
u=
(Rate of heat absorbed by moisture evaporated + Rate of increase in internal energy of dough after frying)
(Rate of heat supply by fuel)
Qmoisture Qdough
u =
Q fuel
2
TdL Td
Qmoisture 0.098650Td 0.0006267 h fg
Tdo
2
TdL = 85oC
Tdo = 40oC
hfg = 2257kJ/kg
89
Qmoisture 0.098650 85 0.0006267
852 2257
2
0.098650 40 0.0006267
40 2
2257
2
22578.38525 2.26395375
22573.946 0.50136
13815.76564 7774.55248
Qmoisture 6041.21316kJ / kg
o o
Also, Qdough = m d TdL Tdo CP d m m C P m TdL Tdo
o o
Qdough m d CP d m m C P m TdL Tdo
Where TdL Td @ y L
Tdo Td @ y O
o
m d 54kg
CPL 1.40 KJ / kgK
o
m m 18kg
C P m 2.0267kJ / kgK
Td : 85o 358K
Tdo 40o 313K
6041.21316kJ 5043.627 kJ
:. u =
46000kJ
11084.8402 1000
46000 1000
24%
ov =
Rate of heat extraction from the flue gas
Rate of heat sup ply by fuel
Q flue
ov =
Q fuel
o
But Qflue = m flue gas C
T flue | y o CP flueT flue | y L
P flue
o
m flue gas = 31.48kg
39079.5225 100
:. ov = 84.96%
46000
91
3024kJ
o
Q flame m fg CPflameTad
CPflame 1.31688kJ / kg oC
Tad 2113o C
2113 25
1064o C
2
o
Qdough mdough CPdough Tdough
o
Tdough is the inlet temperature of the dough m dough 54kg
92
CPd = 1.40kJ/kgoC
Tdough = 40oC
= 3024kJ
o
Q flame m fg CPflameTad
Tad = 2113oC
2113 25
1064o C
2
:. Qflame = 31.48 x 1.31688 x1064
= 44108.52684kJ
o
Q drying = M vap [CP dough (Tboil T dough) ]
o
Where M Vap = mass of moisture removed from dough = 18kg
= 18 x 1.40 x 60
= 1512kJ
o
Qgari = m gari CPgariTgari
o
m gari 54hg
Tgari 85o C
Qgari 54 1.40 85
6426kJ
Gari = 13.63%
Drying = 3.21%
Flue gas = 82.91%
DOUGH
FLAME
100%
95
1200
theoretical flue gas, plate and dough temperatures[0C]
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
Fig 5.1 Grahical solution of the Theoretical Analysis (yellow: flue gas, blue: plate and black: dough)
96
1200
1000
flue gas temperature[0C]
800
600
400
200
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
Fig 5.2 Graph of Theoretical Flue Gas Temperature Against Machine Lenght
97
200
190
180
plate temperature[0C]
170
160
150
140
130
120
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
110
100
95
90
85
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
200
160
140
120
100
80
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
Fig 5.5 Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Plate Temperatures against Machine Length
(green:experimental and red :theoretical)
100
1200
800
600
400
200
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
machine length [m]
Fig 5.6 Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Flue Gas Temperatures against Machine
Length (green:experimental and red :theoretical)
initial experimental temperature values of the plate and dough. This suggests
that we should have a lower value for it to agree with the experimental
The calculated heat transfer coefficients used in this work agree with
the experimental except that of the heat transfer coefficient between the flue
efficiency very well, both indicate that the useful efficiency is very low
compared with the overall efficiency. This means that a lot of heat is lost
From fig 5.5, where we have the graph of experimental and the
graphs. We can only notice deviation at the entrance and exit end of the
outside the heating chamber contrary to what we have in practice where the
burners flame was positioned at the entrance of the heating chamber of the
102
machine. This explains why we have the deviation at the entrance end of the
machine.
Also we have deviation at the exit end where the experimental temperature
rose sharply above the theoretical before coming down below the theoretical
temperatures.
From fig 5.6, we noticed close agreement of the experimental flue gas
temperatures with theoretical flue gas temperatures at the exit end while the
entrance has a very large deviation which is also as a result of non inclusion
equations.
rate of heat transfer on the plate/dough interface and dough/air interface but
4.3 CONCLUSION
capacity processing equipment for gari processing in this country and this
The heat transfer coefficients between the flue gas and plate, the plate
There was too much heat lost from the machine that led to low
There was improper heat distribution due to the position of the burner.
REFERENCES
Duffie, J.A. and Bechman, W.A. (1980), Solar Energy Thermal Processes,
Wiley, New York, N.Y.
Holman, T.P. (1983), Heat Transfer, Mc. Graw Hill Inc, 5th Edition.
Iteke, B.A. (2005), Simulating Wood Fires in Diesel Fired Gari Troughs.
APPENDIX A
ans =
Columns 1 through 6
Columns 7 through 10
ans =
1.0e+003 *
Columns 1 through 6
Columns 7 through 10
>>
>>
109
APPENDIX B
1000 25
513.5 o C 513 o C
2
C02 = 1.1544
H20 = 2.12388
S02 = 1.090744
N2 = 1.11384
Energy equation is
Tad 253.16 1.1544 1.15 2.12388 0.018 1.090744 10.98 1.11384 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 23328728
18.3395
For the second iteration, the new mean temperature of the product is
110
2357.8728 25
1191.4364
2
Co2 = 1.321
H20 = 2.5885
So2 = 1.2073
N2 = 1.240
Tad 253.16 1.321 1.15 2.5885 0.018 1.2073 10.98 1.240 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2058.09
20.7881
Tad 2083o C
2083 25
1054 o C
2
Co2 = 1.294
111
H20 = 2.5067
S02 = 1.1917
N2 = 1.2228
Energy equation is
Tad 253.16 1.294 1.15 2.5067 0.018 1.1917 10.98 1.2228 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2095.238
20.4195
2120 25
1072.5 o C
2
C02 = 1.3054
H20 = 2.5185
S02 = 1.1941
N2 = 1.2254
Energy equation is
112
Tad 253.16 1.3054 1.15 2.5185 0.018 1.1941 10.98 1.2254 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2087.2550
20.4976
2112 25
1063.5 o C
2
Co2 = 1.304
H20 = 2.513
So2 = 1.193
N2 = 1.224
113
Tad 253.16 1.304 1.15 2.513 0.018 1.193 10.98 1.224 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2089.978093
20.470897
6th Iteration,
2115 25
1070o C
2
Co2 = 1.305
H20 = 2.517
So2 = 1.194
N2 = 1.220
Tad 253.16 1.305 1.15 2.517 0.018 1.194 10.98 1.220 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2097.709871
20.395442
7th Iteration,
2.123 25
1075o C
2
Co2 = 1.306
H20 = 2.515
So2 = 1.194
N2 = 1.226
Tad 253.16 1.306 1.15 2.515 0.018 1.194 10.98 1.226 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2086.949947
20500602
Tad 2112o C
8th Iteration,
2123 25
1074o C
2
Co2 = 1.305
115
H20 = 2.316
So2 = 1.194
N2 = 1.225
Energy equation,
Tad 253.16 1.305 1.15 2.516 0.018 1.194 10.98 1.225 42783.72
42783.72
Tad 25 2088.111625
20.489192
9th Iteration,
2113 25
1069o C
2
Co2 = 1.305
H20 = 2.515
So2 = 1.194
N2 = 1.225
Energy equation,
116
Tad 253.16 1.305 1.15 2.515 0.018 1.194 10.98 1.225 42783.72
42783 .72
Tad 25 2088 .228831
20.488042
Tad 2113 o C
:. The Adiabatic flame temperature is 2113