Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
54
MEMORY AID IN COMMERCIAL LAW
TRANSPORTATION LAWS
Parties
1. Common carrier 1. Common carrier
2. Shipper 2. Passenger
3. Consignee
Cause of liability
Delay in delivery, loss, destruction, or Death or injury to the passengers
deterioration of the goods
Duration of liability
From the time the goods are unconditionally The duty of a common carrier to provide safety
placed in the possession of, and received by the to its passengers so obligates it not only during
carrier for transportation until the same are the course of the trip, but for so long as the
delivered actually or constructively by the passengers are within its premises and where
carrier to the consignee or to the person who they ought to be in pursuance to the contract
has the right to receive them. (Art. 1736) of carriage. (LRTA v. Navidad, [2003])
It remains in full force and effect even when All persons who remain on the premises within
they are temporarily unloaded or stored in a reasonable time after leaving the conveyance
transit unless the shipper or owner has made are to be deemed passengers, and what is a
use of the right of stoppage in transitu. (Art. reasonable time or a reasonable delay within
1737) this rule is to be determined from all the
It continues to be operative even during the circumstances, and includes a reasonable time
time the goods are stored in a warehouse of the to see after his baggage and prepare for his
carrier at the place of destination until the departure. (La Mallorca v. CA, 17 SCRA 739 ;
consignee has bee advised of the arrival of the Abiotiz Shipping Corporation v. CA, 179 SCRA
goods and has had reasonable opportunity 95)
thereafter to remove them or otherwise dispose It is the duty of common carriers of
of them. (Art. 1738) passengers to stop their conveyances a
Delivery of goods to the custom authorities is reasonable length of time in order to afford
not delivery to the consignee. (Lu Do v. passengers an opportunity to enter, and they
Binamira, 101 Phil 120) are liable for injuries suffered from the sudden
starting up or jerking of their conveyances
while doing so. The duty which the carrier of
passengers owes to its patrons extends to
persons boarding the cars as well as to those
alighting therefrom (Dangwa Trans Co., Inc. vs.
CA 202 SCRA 574).
Presumption of negligence
Void stipulations
1. That the goods are transported at the risk Dispensing with or lessening the extraordinary
of the owner or shipper; responsibility of a common carrier for the
2. That carrier will not be liable for any loss, safety of passengers imposed by law by
destruction or deterioration of the goods; stipulation, by posting of notices, by
3. That the carrier need not observe any statements on tickets or otherwise. (Art. 1757)
diligence in the custody of the goods;
4. That the carrier shall exercise a degree of
diligence less than that of a good father of a
family over the movable transported;
5. That the carrier shall not be responsible for
the acts or omissions of his or its employees;
6. That the carriers liability for acts
committed by thieves or robbers who do not
act with grave or irresistible threat, violence or
force is dispensed with or diminished;
7. That the carrier is not responsible for the
loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods
on account of the defective condition of the
car, vehicle, ship or other equipment used in
the contract of carriage. (Art. 1745)
PURPOSES:
1. To secure adequate, sustained
service for the public at the least
possible cost;
2. To protect the public against
unreasonable charges and poor,
inefficient service;
3. To protect and secure investments in
An authorization An authorization meters and all expenses of
issued by the issued by the measuring investigation;
appropriate appropriate appliances; 4. Valuation of
government agency government agency 5. Issuance of properties of public
for the operation of for the operation of orders requiring utilities;
public services for public service for establishment or 5. Examination
which no franchise, which a prior maintenance of and test of
either municipal or franchise is required extension of measuring
legislative, is by law; e.g. facilities; appliances;
required by law, telephone and other 6. Revocation, or 6. Grant of special
e.g., common services. modification of CPC permits to make
carriers. or CPCN; extra or special trips
7. Suspension of in territories
CPC or CPCN, specified in the
except when it is certificate;
A CPC or a CPCN constitutes neither a
necessary to avoid 7. Uniform
franchise nor a contract, confers no property
serious and accounting system
right, and is a mere license or a privilege. The
irreparable damage and furnishing of
holder of said certificate does not acquire a
or inconvenience annual reports;
property right in the route covered thereby.
to the public or 8. Compelling
Nor does it confer upon the holder any
private interest, in compliance with the
proprietary right or interest or franchise in the
which case, a laws and
public highways. Revocation of this certificate
suspension not regulations.
deprives him of no vested right. New and
more than 30 days
additional burdens, alteration of the
may be ordered,
certificate, or even revocation or annulment
prior to the
thereof is reserved to the State. (Luque vs.
hearing. (Soriano v.
Villegas, 30 SCRA 408)
Medina, 164 SCRA
36)
It is a property and has a considerable
value and can be the subject of sale or
attachment. (Cogeo-Cubao Operators and UNLAWFUL ACTS OF PUBLIC UTILITY
Drivers Assn. vs. CA, 207 SCRA 343, COMPANIES
Raymundo vs. Luneta Motor Co.) 1. Engagement in public service business
without first securing the proper
REQUREMENTS FOR GRANTING CPC OR certificate;
CPCN 2. Providing or maintaining unsafe,
1. Applicant must be a citizen of the improper or inadequate service as
Philippines or a corporation or entity 60% determined by the proper authority;
of the capital of which is owned by such 3. Committing any act of unreasonable and
citizens; unjust preferential treatment to any
2. Applicant must prove public necessity; particular person, corporation or entity as
3. Applicant must prove that the operation determined by the proper authority;
of the public service proposed and the 4. Refusing or neglecting to carry public
authorization to do business will promote mail upon request. (Secs. 18 and 19)
the public interest on a proper and
suitable manner; ACTS REQUIRING PRIOR APPROVAL
4. Applicant must have sufficient financial 1. Establish and maintain individual or joint
capability to undertake the proposed rates;
services and meeting the responsibilities 2. Establish and operate new units;
incident to its operation. 3. Issue free tickets;
4. Issue any stock or stock certificates
representing an increase of capital;
5. Capitalize any franchise in excess of the
POWERS POWERS
amount actually paid to the Government;
REQUIRING EXERCISABLE
6. Sell, alienate, mortgage or lease
PRIOR NOTICE WITHOUT PRIOR
property, certificates or franchise.
AND HEARING NOTICE AND
HEARING
Under Sec. 20(g) of C.A. No. 146, the sale,
etc. may be negotiated and completed before
1. Issuance of 1. Investigation the approval by the proper authority. Its
CPC or CPCN; any matter approval is not a condition precedent to the
2. Fixing of rates, concerning public validity of the contract. The approval is
tolls, and charges; service; necessary only to protect public interest.
3. Setting up of 2. Requiring
standards and operators to furnish PRIOR OPERATOR/OLD OPERATOR RULE
classifications; safe, adequate, and The rule allowing an existing franchised
4. Establishment proper service; operator to invoke a preferential right within
of rules to secure 3. Requiring public the authorized territory as long as he renders
accuracy of all services to pay satisfactory and economical service.
The policy is not to issue a certificate to a inexistent under Art. 1409, Civil Code.
second operator to cover the same field and Effects:
in competition with a first operator who is 1. The transfer, sale, lease or assignment of
rendering sufficient, adequate and the privilege granted is valid between the
satisfactory service. The prior operator must contracting parties but not upon the
first be given an opportunity to improve its public or third persons. (Gelisan vs.
service, if inadequate or deficient. Alday, 154 SCRA 388)
Purpose: To prevent ruinous and wasteful 2. The registered owner is primarily liable
competition in order that the interests of the for all the consequences flowing from the
public would be conserved and preserved. operations of the carrier.
The public has the right to assume
It subordinates the prior applicant rule that the registered owner is the actual or
which gives the first applicant priority only if lawful owner thereof. It would be very
things and circumstances are equal. difficult and often impossible, as a
practical matter, for the public to enforce
Where the operator either fails or neglects their rights of action that they may have
to make the improvement or effect the for injuries inflicted by the vehicle if they
increase in services, especially when given should be required to prove who the
the opportunity, new operators should be actual owner is. (Benedicto vs. IAC, 187
given the chance to give the services needed SCRA 547)
by the public. 3. The thrust of the law in enjoining the
kabit system is to identify the person
PRIOR APPLICANT RULE upon whom responsibility may be fixed
Presupposes a situation when two interested with the end in view of protecting the
persons apply for a certificate to operate a riding public (Lim vs. CA 373 SCRA 394).
public utility in the same community over 4. The registered owner cannot recover
which no person has as yet granted any from the actual owner and the latter
certificate. If it turns out, after the hearing, cannot obtain transfer of the vehicle to
that the circumstances between the two himself, both being in pari delicto. (Teja
applicants are more or less equal, then the Marketing vs. IAC)
applicant who applied ahead of the other, will 5. For the better protection of the public,
be granted the certificate. both the registered owner and the actual
owner are jointly and severally liable with
RATE-FIXING POWER the driver. (Zamboanga Transportation
The rate to be fixed must be just, founded Co. vs. CA)
upon conditions which are fair and reasonable
to both the owner and the public.
A rate is just and reasonable if it conforms to
the following requirements:
1. One which yields to the carrier a fair
return upon the value of the property
employed in performing the service;
and
2. One which is fair to the public for the
service rendered.
KABIT SYSTEM
A system whereby a person who has been
granted a certificate of public convenience
allows other persons who own motor vehicles
to operate under such license, for a fee or
percentage of such earnings. It is void and