0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
12 Ansichten1 Seite
Linguistic determinism is the idea that language shapes human thought and cognition. It stems from the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which argues that the language we speak programs our perceptions and experiences of reality. For example, cultures with many words for rice or snow perceive finer distinctions in those domains. While language likely influences thought to some degree, the theory should not be taken to an extreme of relativism, as there are also linguistic universals and words often describe objective realities rather than constructing them.
Linguistic determinism is the idea that language shapes human thought and cognition. It stems from the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which argues that the language we speak programs our perceptions and experiences of reality. For example, cultures with many words for rice or snow perceive finer distinctions in those domains. While language likely influences thought to some degree, the theory should not be taken to an extreme of relativism, as there are also linguistic universals and words often describe objective realities rather than constructing them.
Linguistic determinism is the idea that language shapes human thought and cognition. It stems from the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which argues that the language we speak programs our perceptions and experiences of reality. For example, cultures with many words for rice or snow perceive finer distinctions in those domains. While language likely influences thought to some degree, the theory should not be taken to an extreme of relativism, as there are also linguistic universals and words often describe objective realities rather than constructing them.
Linguistic determinism is the idea that language and its structures limit and determine human
knowledge or thought, as well as thought processes such as categorization, memory, and
perception. The term implies that people of different languages have different thought processes. Linguistic determinism : Sapir-Whorf hypothesis This hypothesisa position of linguistic relativityargues that (to quote one of its authors) language is not merely a reproducing instrument for voicing ideas, but is itself a shaper of ideas, the programme and guide for the individual's meaningful activity. In short, language determines (or shapes) our perceptions of reality. The classic literary example of this is the newspeak of the totalitarian rulers of George Orwell's 1984. The most famous commonly cited examples in social science are probably those of the Hanunoo, who have 92 names for rice, each conveying a different reality, and the Eskimo, who have over a hundred words for snow. Such fine differentiation permits these cultures to see important facets of their culture more clearly.
This is an important theory and there is broad truth in the argument
that language plays a role in shaping reality. But it should not be overstated and collapse into extreme relativism: there seem also to be linguistic universals, or features common to every language; and words are often invented to reflect, rather than construct new phenomena in reality. (In the case of microwave ovens, for example, we need the word microwave to depict a real phenomenonnot to invent the ovens themselves.