Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
5
(4/30/2015) pt Line width), Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto,
0.5 pt Line width), Left: (Single solid line, Auto,
0.5 pt Line width), Right: (Single solid line,
Auto, 0.5 pt Line width)
This document outlines the issues that must be addressed in evaluating a certification
program. For a certification program to be valid, answers to all of the following
questions should be Yes:
1
d. Can the course provider demonstrate that an objective method has been
used to determine the minimum level of individual course competency
(pass/fail grades)?
e. Are there publicly available criteria with a defined review and approval
process for selection of course presenters?
12. Is there a publicly available list of certified individuals, including full name,
certification title/type, and current certification status, with sufficient contact
information to confirm/ensure their identity?
13. Is continuing education and/or retesting required to maintain the certification at
specific intervals?
14. Are recertification, continuing education requirements, related standards and
approved providers independently determined and publicly available?
15. If the certification claims to be endorsed by the US Government, or to be accredited
by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or other professionally
recognized accreditation organization, is there documentation to prove that)?
[NOTE: Formal ANSI accreditation is not the same as being an ANSI member.]