Simulation of rear

frame
Date:
19 February 2016
Designer:
Guilherme Dias
Study name: Static 1
Analysis type:
Static

Table of Contents
Description
Assumptions
Model Information
Study Properties
Units
Material Properties
Description Loads and Fixtures
FEA on Frame
Connector Definitions
Contact Information
Mesh information
Sensor Details
Resultant Forces
Beams
Study Results
Conclusion

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 1

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Assumptions

Model Information

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 2

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Model name: rear frame

Current Configuration: Valor predeterminado<Como usinado>
Beam Bodies:
Document Name and Document Path/Date
Formulation Properties
Reference Modified
Beam1(Componente
estrutural5[3]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:508.612mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.98465e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.544803kg
Weight:5.33907N

Beam2(Componente
estrutural12[1]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:175.023mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:2.40253e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.187398kg
Weight:1.8365N

Beam3(Componente
estrutural6[3]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:451.957mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.17712e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.481815kg
Weight:4.72179N

Section E:\assignment1
Beam4(Componente Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3 videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S
estrutural8) Section Area: 137.288in^2 frame.SLDPRT
Length:175mm Oct 06 17:36:26 2015

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 3

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Volume:2.40253e005m^3
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Mass:0.187398kg
Weight:1.8365N

Beam5(Componente
estrutural11[2]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:768.854mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:0.000105216m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.820684kg
Weight:8.04271N

Beam6(Componente
estrutural5[2]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:170.342mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:2.30028e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.179422kg
Weight:1.75834N

Beam7(Componente
estrutural13) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:175mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:2.40253e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.187398kg
Weight:1.8365N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 4

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Beam8(Componente
estrutural9[1]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:450mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.17794e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.481879kg
Weight:4.72242N

Beam9(Componente
estrutural5[5]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:250.016mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:3.43274e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.267753kg
Weight:2.62398N

Beam10(Componente
estrutural6[2]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:250.651mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:3.43108e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.267625kg
Weight:2.62272N

Beam11(Componente
estrutural11[1]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:287.181mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:3.91189e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.305127kg
Weight:2.99025N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 5

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Beam12(Componente
estrutural5[6]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:350.009mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:4.80432e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.374737kg
Weight:3.67242N

Beam13(Componente
estrutural14) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:482.83mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.62866e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.517035kg
Weight:5.06695N

Beam14(Componente
estrutural9[2]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:450mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.17794e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.481879kg
Weight:4.72242N

Beam15(Componente
estrutural6[1]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:451.951mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.17873e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.481941kg
Weight:4.72302N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 6

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Beam16(Componente
estrutural5[4]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:350.009mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:4.80431e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.374736kg
Weight:3.67242N

Beam17(Componente
estrutural15) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:482.83mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.62866e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.517035kg
Weight:5.06695N

Beam18(Componente
estrutural5[1]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:508.618mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:6.9847e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.544806kg
Weight:5.3391N

Beam19(Componente
estrutural12[2]) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:285.008mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:3.91357e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.305258kg
Weight:2.99153N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 7

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Beam20(Componente
estrutural7) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:175mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:2.40253e005m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.187398kg
Weight:1.8365N

Beam21(Componente
estrutural10) Section
Standardiso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area: 137.288in^2
E:\assignment1
Length:766.639mm
videos\rear
Beam Uniform C/S Volume:0.00010525m^3
frame.SLDPRT
Mass Density:7800kg/m^3
Oct 06 17:36:26 2015
Mass:0.82095kg
Weight:8.04531N

Study Properties
Study name Static 1
Analysis type Static
Mesh type Beam Mesh
Solver type Direct sparse solver
Inplane Effect: Off
Soft Spring: Off
Inertial Relief: Off
Incompatible bonding options Automatic
Large displacement Off

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 8

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Compute free body forces On

Result folder SOLIDWORKS document (E:\assignment1 videos)

Units
Unit system: SI (MKS)
Length/Displacement mm
Temperature Kelvin
Angular velocity Rad/sec
Pressure/Stress N/m^2

Material Properties
Model Reference Properties Components
SolidBody 1(Componente
Name: Plain Carbon Steel estrutural5[3])(rear frame),
Model type: Linear Elastic SolidBody 2(Componente
Isotropic estrutural12[1])(rear frame),
Default failure Max von Mises Stress SolidBody 3(Componente
criterion: estrutural6[3])(rear frame),
Yield strength: 2.20594e+008 N/m^2 SolidBody 4(Componente
Tensile strength: 3.99826e+008 N/m^2 estrutural8)(rear frame),
Elastic modulus: 2.1e+011 N/m^2 SolidBody 5(Componente
Poisson's ratio: 0.28 estrutural11[2])(rear frame),
Mass density: 7800 kg/m^3 SolidBody 6(Componente
Shear modulus: 7.9e+010 N/m^2 estrutural5[2])(rear frame),
Thermal expansion 1.3e005 /Kelvin SolidBody 7(Componente
coefficient: estrutural13)(rear frame),
SolidBody 8(Componente
estrutural9[1])(rear frame),

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 9

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

SolidBody 9(Componente
estrutural5[5])(rear frame),
SolidBody 10(Componente
estrutural6[2])(rear frame),
SolidBody 11(Componente
estrutural11[1])(rear frame),
SolidBody 12(Componente
estrutural5[6])(rear frame),
SolidBody 13(Componente
estrutural14)(rear frame),
SolidBody 14(Componente
estrutural9[2])(rear frame),
SolidBody 15(Componente
estrutural6[1])(rear frame),
SolidBody 16(Componente
estrutural5[4])(rear frame),
SolidBody 17(Componente
estrutural15)(rear frame),
SolidBody 18(Componente
estrutural5[1])(rear frame),
SolidBody 19(Componente
estrutural12[2])(rear frame),
SolidBody 20(Componente
estrutural7)(rear frame),
SolidBody 21(Componente
estrutural10)(rear frame)
Curve Data:N/A

Loads and Fixtures

Fixture name Fixture Image Fixture Details

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 10

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Entities: 4 Joint(s)
Type: Fixed Geometry

Fixed1

Load name Load Image Load Details

Entities: 1 plane(s), 1 Beam (s)

Reference: Plano direito
Type: Apply force
Values: 5000, 9000, 6000 N
Force1
Moments: , , N.m

Connector Definitions
No Data

Contact Information
No Data

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 11

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Mesh information
Mesh type Beam Mesh

Mesh information Details

Total Nodes 444
Total Elements 421
Time to complete mesh(hh;mm;ss): 00:00:02
Computer name: BST392C01

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 12

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 13

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Sensor Details
No Data

Resultant Forces

Reaction forces
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N 5584.74 8377.1 4653.95 11091.6

Reaction Moments
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N.m 2184.51 91.2923 148.79 2191.48

Beams

Beam Forces
Join Axial(N Shear1( Shear2( Moment1(N. Moment2(N. Torque(N.
Beam Name
ts ) N) N) m) m) m)
Beam1(Comp 1 1320.5 272.419 217.026 70.5033 154.914 33.0209
onente
estrutural5[3] 2 1320.5 272.421 217.026 39.8788 16.3578 33.0209
)
Beam2(Comp 1 1124.2 223.714 716.383 56.6464 109.867 25.889
onente
estrutural12[ 2 1124.2 223.715 716.383 68.7206 70.7171 25.8889
1])

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 14

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Beam3(Comp 1 2019.39 417.796 820.35 87.5706 39.8594 97.5493

onente 2 2019.39 417.796 820.35 81.6266 46.311 97.5493
estrutural6[3]
3 2019.38 382.907 281.993 42.3869 43.768 97.5492
)
Beam4(Comp 1 312.664 830.165 70.9828 12.6642 92.1414 27.5951
onente
2 312.664 830.164 70.9828 0.242165 237.42 27.5951
estrutural8)
Beam5(Comp 1 952.857 23.9132 445.785 211.946 17.863 7.18527
onente
estrutural11[ 2 954.181 16.7771 443.272 127.508 0.709142 8.29654
2])
Beam6(Comp 1 2212.13 465.741 305.546 120.704 325.433 153.732
onente
estrutural5[2] 2 10424.3 1838.85 5890.28 256.242 295.258 88.8587
)
Beam7(Comp 1 62.677 98.7316 109.475 8.39235 72.0683 4.78102
onente
2 62.6769 98.7317 109.475 10.7658 54.7903 4.78102
estrutural13)
Beam8(Comp 1 725.77 581.074 724.057 74.6038 42.6898 20.4525
onente 2 725.77 581.074 724.057 74.733 77.1566 20.4525
estrutural9[1]
3 1442.15 212.714 361.39 39.7022 44.6646 50.2645
)
Beam9(Comp 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
onente
estrutural5[5] 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
)
Beam10(Com 0.08643 0.085492
1 0.825654 0.0672149 0.00696217 0.00162677
ponente 49 7
estrutural6[2] 0.08643 0.085492
2 0.825654 0.139199 0.0144109 0.00162654
) 55 1
Beam11(Com 1 278.071 70.5929 50.3413 17.746 18.6116 37.0987
ponente
estrutural11[ 2 278.071 70.5939 50.3414 3.39638 1.51073 37.0987
1])
Beam12(Com 1 86.9891 1649.58 1127.16 104.997 436.279 17.3419
ponente 2 1004.58 1508.38 401.394 11.0421 168.055 12.1112
estrutural5[6]
3 1004.58 1508.38 401.394 59.1991 95.9025 12.1112
)
Beam13(Com 1 963.066 91.8221 186.319 49.9991 9.07177 4.87334
ponente
2 963.068 92.2763 186.083 39.9253 35.3079 4.85804
estrutural14)

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 15

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Beam14(Com 1 84.8252 134.361 22.5925 8.13746 35.2599 7.68489

ponente 2 194.3 80.195 81.0532 8.65979 6.27116 47.1054
estrutural9[2]
3 194.3 80.195 81.0532 9.57718 11.7727 47.1054
)
Beam15(Com 1 150.588 36.2699 81.346 8.18717 0.888363 51.2105
ponente 2 151.763 127.884 30.0385 1.76263 15.2446 51.6546
estrutural6[1]
3 151.687 127.974 30.0385 4.46331 11.1332 51.6523
)
Beam16(Com 1 693.161 1248.63 268.479 37.286 51.0341 15.4984
ponente 2 583.162 1277.46 74.1786 8.49835 343.998 10.1037
estrutural5[4]
3 582.531 1277.75 74.1786 4.47752 120.405 10.1002
)
Beam17(Com 1 529.613 14.2293 20.4928 5.67829 16.6859 32.1851
ponente
2 529.612 14.3946 20.3921 15.5344 9.73766 32.184
estrutural15)
Beam18(Com 1 1452.98 140.567 498.879 162.913 153.139 26.6822
ponente
estrutural5[1] 2 1452.94 140.984 498.879 90.8353 81.635 26.6591
)
Beam19(Com 1 4144.62 41.5351 108.45 48.1094 40.5265 60.8558
ponente
estrutural12[ 2 4144.62 41.5518 108.453 79.0224 28.6852 60.8555
2])
Beam20(Com 1 8418.28 6013.42 724.348 84.0518 869.06 13.5587
ponente
2 8418.27 6013.43 724.348 42.7092 183.289 13.5587
estrutural7)
Beam21(Com 1 11184.1 237.126 285.813 181.452 64.7605 16.6502
ponente
2 11186 185.609 243.877 7.92562 73.7667 15.9322
estrutural10)

Beam Stresses
Worst
Joint Axial(N/m^2 Bending Bending Torsional
Beam Name Case(N/m^2
s ) Dir1(N/m^2) Dir2(N/m^2) (N/m^2)
)
2.62467e+00 2.79732e+00
Beam1(Compone 1 9.61851e+006 1.19452e+008 2.97989e+008
8 7
nte
6.75655e+00 2.77146e+00 2.79732e+00
estrutural5[3]) 2 9.61851e+006 8.26472e+007
7 7 7

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 16

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

8.18868e+00 9.59744e+00 2.19315e+00

Beam2(Compone 1 1.86145e+008 2.17619e+008
6 7 7
nte
8.18868e+00 2.19315e+00
estrutural12[1]) 2 1.16431e+008 1.19814e+008 1.75257e+008
6 7
8.26375e+00
1 1.47092e+007 1.48368e+008 6.75326e+007 1.77724e+008
7
Beam3(Compone
1.38298e+00 7.84634e+00 8.26375e+00
nte 2 1.47092e+007 1.73715e+008
8 7 7
estrutural6[3])
1.47092e+00 7.41549e+00 8.26375e+00
3 7.1815e+007 1.17939e+008
7 7 7
1.56113e+00 2.33768e+00
1 2.27744e+006 2.14566e+007 1.59858e+008
Beam4(Compone 8 7
nte estrutural8) 4.02254e+00 2.33768e+00
2 2.27744e+006 410294 4.04532e+008
8 7
Beam5(Compone 3.59094e+00 3.02648e+00
1 6.94059e+006 6.0869e+006 3.67307e+008
nte 8 7
estrutural11[2]) 2 6.95023e+006 2.16033e+008 1.20148e+006 7.0283e+006 2.22987e+008
2.04505e+00 1.30232e+00
Beam6(Compone 1 1.61131e+007 5.51372e+008 6.04189e+008
8 8
nte
7.59307e+00 5.00247e+00 7.52755e+00
estrutural5[2]) 2 4.34145e+008 7.38297e+008
7 8 7
4.05017e+00
1 456538 1.42189e+007 1.22103e+008 1.23385e+008
Beam7(Compone 6
nte estrutural13) 1.82401e+00 4.05018e+00
2 456538 9.28297e+007 9.50613e+007
7 6
1.73261e+00
1 5.2865e+006 1.26399e+008 7.23282e+007 1.50916e+008
7
Beam8(Compone
1.26618e+00 1.30724e+00 1.73261e+00
nte 2 5.2865e+006 1.87278e+008
8 8 7
estrutural9[1])
6.72663e+00 4.25809e+00
3 1.05046e+007 7.56741e+007 1.11753e+008
7 7
Beam9(Compone 1 0 0 0 0 0
nte
2 0 0 0 0 0
estrutural5[5])
Beam10(Compon 1 629.59 113880 11795.8 1378.09 115119
ente
2 629.594 235840 24416 1377.9 237731
estrutural6[2])
2.02547e+00 3.14276e+00
Beam11(Compon 1 3.00665e+007 3.1533e+007 4.55953e+007
6 7
ente
2.02546e+00 2.55959e+00 3.14277e+00
estrutural11[1]) 2 5.7544e+006 8.32345e+006
6 6 7

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 17

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

1.77893e+00 7.39176e+00 1.46909e+00

1 633627 7.60914e+008
8 8 7
Beam12(Compon
7.31733e+00 1.87084e+00 2.84731e+00 1.02599e+00
ente 2 2.92662e+008
6 7 8 7
estrutural5[6])
7.31733e+00 1.02598e+00
3 1.00299e+008 1.62485e+008 1.98266e+008
6 7
4.12839e+00
Beam13(Compon 1 7.01495e+006 8.4712e+007 1.537e+007 9.31101e+007
6
ente
4.11542e+00
estrutural14) 2 7.01497e+006 6.76443e+007 5.98212e+007 9.73163e+007
6
6.51015e+00
1 617865 1.37871e+007 5.97399e+007 6.1928e+007
6
Beam14(Compon
3.99047e+00
ente 2 1.41528e+006 1.4672e+007 1.06251e+007 1.95305e+007
7
estrutural9[2])
1.99462e+00 3.99047e+00
3 1.41528e+006 1.62263e+007 2.7128e+007
7 7
1.50513e+00 4.33823e+00
1 1.09688e+006 1.38713e+007 1.50496e+007
6 7
Beam15(Compon
1.10544e+00 2.98637e+00 2.58285e+00 4.37585e+00
ente 2 2.7106e+007
6 6 7 7
estrutural6[1])
1.10489e+00 4.37565e+00
3 7.56207e+006 1.88627e+007 2.1427e+007
6 7
6.31726e+00 8.64656e+00 1.31292e+00
1 5.04897e+006 1.12133e+008
7 7 7
Beam16(Compon
8.55917e+00
ente 2 4.24774e+006 1.43985e+007 5.82826e+008 5.87251e+008
6
estrutural5[4])
7.58613e+00 8.55622e+00
3 4.24314e+006 2.03999e+008 2.08383e+008
6 6
3.85769e+00 2.82705e+00 2.72651e+00
Beam17(Compon 1 9.62058e+006 3.37203e+007
6 7 7
ente
3.85769e+00 1.64983e+00 2.72643e+00
estrutural15) 2 2.63195e+007 3.49206e+007
6 7 7
1.05835e+00 2.76019e+00 2.26035e+00
Beam18(Compon 1 2.59459e+008 3.89405e+008
7 8 7
ente
1.05832e+00 2.25839e+00
estrutural5[1]) 2 1.539e+008 1.38312e+008 2.17502e+008
7 7
6.86629e+00 5.15531e+00
Beam19(Compon 1 3.01893e+007 8.15103e+007 1.36766e+008
7 7
ente
4.86005e+00 5.15529e+00
estrutural12[2]) 2 3.01893e+007 1.33886e+008 1.72623e+008
7 7

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 18

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

6.13186e+00 1.42407e+00 1.47242e+00 1.14861e+00

1 1.54061e+009
Beam20(Compon 7 8 9 7
ente estrutural7) 6.13185e+00 1.14861e+00
2 7.23609e+007 3.10542e+008 3.8018e+008
7 7
8.14645e+00 3.07429e+00 1.09722e+00
Beam21(Compon 1 1.4105e+007 4.07887e+008
7 8 8
ente
8.14788e+00 1.34967e+00
estrutural10) 2 1.34282e+007 1.24981e+008 2.07179e+008
7 7

Study Results

Name Type Min Max

TXY: Shear in Y Dir. on YZ 0 N/m^2 1.54061e+009 N/m^2
Stress1
Plane Element: 155 Element: 379

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 19

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

rear frameStatic 1StressStress1

Name Type Min Max

0 mm 21.3671 mm
Displacement1 URES: Resultant Displacement
Node: 38 Node: 378

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 20

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

rear frameStatic 1DisplacementDisplacement1

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 21

 Guilherme Dias
19/02/2016

Conclusion

The rear frame model chosen follows the necessary criteria and is suitable for the suspension geometry.

It also attends the specifications and the results were satisfactory.

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of rear frame 22