Evaluation of Teachers by Students

Name of Staff Member : Dr. K. Kumara Pillai (Management Studies)

Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-Marketing - FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
No. of Students Responded : 8
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 5
Good : 2
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 15.91

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 3
Good : 4
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.17

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 4
10 to 25% : 0
More than 25% : 3
Blank : 1
Index : 3.85

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 5
Yes : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 2.75

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 5
Satisfactory : 3
Inadequate : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 8.16

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 3
Good : 5
Fair : 0
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 12.82

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 6
Sometimes : 1
No : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 5.74

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 7
Indifferent : 0
Unpleasant : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 6.07

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 7
Not Sincere : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 10.7

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 5
Good : 2
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0

Index : 10.09

Speed of presentation
Just right : 6
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 1
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 3.88

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 86.13

Name of Staff Member : Dr. K. Kumara Pillai (Management Studies)

Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-HR - FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
No. of Students Responded : 12
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 6
Good : 4
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 15.11

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 4
Good : 6
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 5.88

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 6
10 to 25% : 4
More than 25% : 0
Blank : 2
Index : 4.42

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 9
Yes : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 3.17

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 3
Satisfactory : 8
Inadequate : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 6.75

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 1
Good : 10
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 11.73

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 6
Sometimes : 4
No : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 4.86

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 8
Indifferent : 3
Unpleasant : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 5.36Har

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 9
Not Sincere : 1
Unable to judge : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 9.49

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 3
Good : 8
Fair : 0
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 9

Speed of presentation
Just right : 6
Too fast : 2
Too slow : 3
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 3.01

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 78.77

Unable to judge : 0
Index : 3.88

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 86.13

Name of Staff Member : Dr. K. Kumara Pillai (Management Studies)

Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-HR - FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
No. of Students Responded : 12
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 6
Good : 4
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 15.11

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 4
Good : 6
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 5.88

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 6
10 to 25% : 4
More than 25% : 0
Blank : 2
Index : 4.42
Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation
No : 9
Yes : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 3.17

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 3
Satisfactory : 8
Inadequate : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 6.75

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 1
Good : 10
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 11.73

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 6
Sometimes : 4
No : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 4.86

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 8
Indifferent : 3
Unpleasant : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 5.36

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 9
Not Sincere : 1
Unable to judge : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 9.49

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 3
Good : 8
Fair : 0
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 9

Speed of presentation
Just right : 6
Too fast : 2
Too slow : 3
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 3.01

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 78.77

Evaluation of Teachers by Students

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Reji John (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(IR) - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
AND LABOUR LAWS
No. of Students Responded : 11
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 7
Good : 3
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 16.08

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 6
Good : 4
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.54

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 7
10 to 25% : 1
More than 25% : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 4.58

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 7
Yes : 4
Blank : 0Evaluation of Teachers by Students
Name of Staff Member : Mr. Reji John (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(IR) - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
AND LABOUR LAWS
No. of Students Responded : 11
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 7
Good : 3
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 16.08

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 6
Good : 4
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.54

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 7
10 to 25% : 1
More than 25% : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 4.58

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 7
Yes : 4
Blank : 0
Index : 2.79

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 7
Satisfactory : 4
Inadequate : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 8.19

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 8
Good : 2
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 13.43

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 9
Sometimes : 2
No : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.33

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 5
Indifferent : 4
Unpleasant : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 4.37
Sincerity of the teacher
Sincere : 10
Not Sincere : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 10.91

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 7
Good : 3
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 10.21

Speed of presentation
Just right : 10
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 4.44

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 87.88

Index : 2.79

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 7
Satisfactory : 4
Inadequate : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 8.19

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 8
Good : 2
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 13.43

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 9
Sometimes : 2
No : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.33

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 5
Indifferent : 4
Unpleasant : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 4.37

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 10
Not Sincere : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 10.91

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 7
Good : 3
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 10.21

Speed of presentation
Just right : 10
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 4.44

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 87.88

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Reji John (Management Studies)

Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-HR - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND
LABOUR LAWS
No. of Students Responded : 12
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 7
Good : 4
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 15.92

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 5
Good : 6
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.32
Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher
Less than 10% : 7
10 to 25% : 3
More than 25% : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 4.62

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 11
Yes : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 3.8

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 5
Satisfactory : 5
Inadequate : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 6.91

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 5
Good : 5
Fair : 2
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 12.32

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 8
Sometimes : 4
No : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.88

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 9
Indifferent : 3
Unpleasant : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.76

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 8
Not Sincere : 1
Unable to judge : 2
Blank : 1
Index : 8.96

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 3
Good : 8
Fair : 0
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 9

Speed of presentation
Just right : 10
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 4.19

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 83.67achers willingness to help

Excellent : 5
Good : 6
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.32

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 7
10 to 25% : 3
More than 25% : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 4.62

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 11
Yes : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 3.8

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 5
Satisfactory : 5
Inadequate : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 6.91

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 5
Good : 5
Fair : 2
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 12.32

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 8
Sometimes : 4
No : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.88

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 9
Indifferent : 3
Unpleasant : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.76

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 8
Not Sincere : 1
Unable to judge : 2
Blank : 1
Index : 8.96

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 3
Good : 8
Fair : 0
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 9

Speed of presentation
Just right : 10
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 4.19

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 83.67

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Reji John (Management Studies)

Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-HR - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND
LABOUR LAWS
No. of Students Responded : 12
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 7
Good : 4
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 15.92

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 5
Good : 6
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.32

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 7
10 to 25% : 3
More than 25% : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 4.62

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 11
Yes : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 3.8

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 5
Satisfactory : 5
Inadequate : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 6.91

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 5
Good : 5
Fair : 2
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 12.32

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 8
Sometimes : 4
No : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.88

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 9
Indifferent : 3
Unpleasant : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.76

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 8
Not Sincere : 1
Unable to judge : 2
Blank : 1
Index : 8.96
Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Excellent : 3
Good : 8
Fair : 0
Poor : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 9

Speed of presentation
Just right : 10
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 4.19

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 83.67

Evaluation of Teachers by Students

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Tony Jacob (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(SHRM) - STRATEGIC
MARKETING MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 14
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 1
Good : 2
Fair : 3
Poor : 8
Blank : 0
Index : 7.51

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 1
Good : 3
Fair : 4
Poor : 5
Blank : 1
Index : 3.47

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 3
10 to 25% : 11
More than 25% : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 4.13

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 9
Yes : 4
Blank : 1
Index : 2.88

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 1
Satisfactory : 3
Inadequate : 8
Blank : 2
Index : 3.9

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 0
Good : 3
Fair : 5
Poor : 5
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 6.44

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 4
Sometimes : 7
No : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 4.07

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 5
Indifferent : 4
Unpleasant : 3
Blank : 2
Index : 3.76

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 4
Not Sincere : 4
Unable to judge : 6
Blank : 0
Index : 5.83

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 1
Good : 3
Fair : 3
Poor : 7
Blank : 0
Index : 4.9

Speed of presentation
Just right : 3
Too fast : 4
Too slow : 4
Unable to judge : 3
Index : 2.04
Teaching Effectiveness Index : 48.94

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Tony Jacob (Management Studies)

Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(IR) - STRATEGIC MARKETING
MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 11
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 1
Good : 1
Fair : 3
Poor : 6
Blank : 0
Index : 7.63

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 1
Good : 0
Fair : 5
Poor : 5
Blank : 0
Index : 3.03

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 5
10 to 25% : 3
More than 25% : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 4.18

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 6
Yes : 3
Blank : 2
Index : 2.67

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 1
Satisfactory : 0
Inadequate : 9
Blank : 1
Index : 3.17

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 0
Good : 1
Fair : 3
Poor : 5
Unable to judge : 2
Index : 4.94
Does the teacher encourage questioning
Yes : 1
Sometimes : 7
No : 2
Blank : 1
Index : 3.4

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 2
Indifferent : 5
Unpleasant : 4
Blank : 0
Index : 2.96

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 1
Not Sincere : 3
Unable to judge : 7
Blank : 0
Index : 4.63

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 0
Good : 1
Fair : 3
Poor : 6
Blank : 1
Index : 3.62

Speed of presentation
Just right : 3
Too fast : 4
Too slow : 1
Unable to judge : 3
Index : 2.27

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 42.5Not Sincere : 3

Unable to judge : 7
Blank : 0
Index : 4.63

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 0
Good : 1
Fair : 3
Poor : 6
Blank : 1
Index : 3.62

Speed of presentation
Just right : 3
Too fast : 4
Too slow : 1
Unable to judge : 3
Index : 2.27

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 42.5

Evaluation of Teachers by Students

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Tony Jacob (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-Marketing - STRATEGIC MARKETING
MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 8
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 1
Good : 3
Fair : 2
Poor : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 10.97

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 1
Good : 3
Fair : 1
Poor : 3
Blank : 0
Index : 4.01

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 2
10 to 25% : 5
More than 25% : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 3.99

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 1
Yes : 7
Blank : 0
Index : 1.09

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 2
Satisfactory : 4
Inadequate : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 6.11

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 2
Good : 2
Fair : 1
Poor : 3
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 8.35

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 2
Sometimes : 4
No : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 3.98

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 6
Indifferent : 0
Unpleasant : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 5.38

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 6
Not Sincere : 1
Unable to judge : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 9.42

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 2
Good : 2
Fair : 2
Poor : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 7.07

Speed of presentation
Just right : 3
Too fast : 3
Too slow : 1
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 2.61

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 62.98

Evaluation of Teachers by Students
Name of Staff Member : Ms. Haritha Simon (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(SHRM) - STRATEGIC HR
MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 14
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 1
Good : 4
Fair : 2
Poor : 6
Blank : 1
Index : 8.86

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 1
Good : 3
Fair : 3
Poor : 6
Blank : 1
Index : 3.27

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 6
10 to 25% : 5
More than 25% : 2
Blank : 1
Index : 4.21

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 8
Yes : 4
Blank : 2
Index : 2.71

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 1
Satisfactory : 8
Inadequate : 3
Blank : 2
Index : 5.27

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 1
Good : 6
Fair : 4
Poor : 1
Unable to judge : 2
Index : 9.14

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 2
Sometimes : 8
No : 2
Blank : 2
Index : 3.57

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 4
Indifferent : 4
Unpleasant : 4
Blank : 2
Index : 3.37

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 5
Not Sincere : 6
Unable to judge : 2
Blank : 1Evaluation of Teachers by Students
Name of Staff Member : Ms. Haritha Simon (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(SHRM) - STRATEGIC HR
MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 14
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 1
Good : 4
Fair : 2
Poor : 6
Blank : 1
Index : 8.86

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 1
Good : 3
Fair : 3
Poor : 6
Blank : 1
Index : 3.27

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 6
10 to 25% : 5
More than 25% : 2
Blank : 1
Index : 4.21

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 8
Yes : 4
Blank : 2
Index : 2.71

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 1
Satisfactory : 8
Inadequate : 3
Blank : 2
Index : 5.27

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 1
Good : 6
Fair : 4
Poor : 1
Unable to judge : 2
Index : 9.14

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 2
Sometimes : 8
No : 2
Blank : 2
Index : 3.57

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 4
Indifferent : 4
Unpleasant : 4
Blank : 2
Index : 3.37

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 5
Not Sincere : 6
Unable to judge : 2
Blank : 1
Index : 5.69

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 2
Good : 4
Fair : 4
Poor : 3
Blank : 1
Index : 6.51

Speed of presentation
Just right : 4
Too fast : 5
Too slow : 2
Unable to judge : 3
Index : 2.31

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 54.89

Index : 5.69
Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Excellent : 2
Good : 4
Fair : 4
Poor : 3
Blank : 1
Index : 6.51

Speed of presentation
Just right : 4
Too fast : 5
Too slow : 2
Unable to judge : 3
Index : 2.31

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 54.89

Evaluation of Teachers by Students

Name of Staff Member : Ms. Haritha Simon (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-HR - STRATEGIC HR MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 12
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 1
Good : 6
Fair : 4
Poor : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 12.26

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 1
Good : 7
Fair : 4
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.3

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 5
10 to 25% : 6
More than 25% : 0
Blank : 1
Index : 4.41

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 8
Yes : 2
Blank : 2
Index : 3.05
Teachers ability to organize lectures
Excellent : 3
Satisfactory : 5
Inadequate : 4
Blank : 0
Index : 5.79

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 2
Good : 5
Fair : 4
Poor : 1
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 10.21

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 5
Sometimes : 5
No : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 4.61

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 7
Indifferent : 1
Unpleasant : 2
Blank : 2
Index : 4.71

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 7
Not Sincere : 0
Unable to judge : 4
Blank : 1
Index : 8.73

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 3
Good : 5
Fair : 2
Poor : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 7.95
Har
Speed of presentation
Just right : 8
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 1
Unable to judge : 2
Index : 3.61
Teaching Effectiveness Index : 70.63
Evaluation of Teachers by Students
Name of Staff Member : Mr. Ranjit Thomas (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(SHRM) - RETAIL
MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 14
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 4
Good : 6
Fair : 3
Poor : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 13.58

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 5
Good : 7
Fair : 1
Poor : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 5.9

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 11
10 to 25% : 1
More than 25% : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 5.13

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 10
Yes : 4
Blank : 0
Index : 3.05

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 5
Satisfactory : 8
Inadequate : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 7.11

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 4
Good : 7
Fair : 2
Poor : 1
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 11.35

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 8
Sometimes : 6
No : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 5.6

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 11
Indifferent : 2
Unpleasant : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 5.79

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 13
Not Sincere : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 11.04

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 6
Good : 5
Fair : 1
Poor : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 8.76

Speed of presentation
Just right : 11
Too fast : 2
Too slow : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 4.02

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 81.34

Evaluation of Teachers by Students

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Ranjit Thomas (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA MARKETING-HR(IR) - Retail MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 11
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 3
Good : 7
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 14.76

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 5
Good : 5
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.37

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 7
10 to 25% : 2
More than 25% : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 4.74

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 9
Yes : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 3.4

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 3
Satisfactory : 7
Inadequate : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 6.79

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 4
Good : 6
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 12.45

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 9
Sometimes : 2
No : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.33

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 10
Indifferent : 1
Unpleasant : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 6.39

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 11
Not Sincere : 0
Unable to judge : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 11.5

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 4
Good : 6
Fair : 1
Poor : 0
Blank : 0
Index : 9.6

Speed of presentation
Just right : 10
Too fast : 0
Too slow : 0
Unable to judge : 1
Index : 4.45

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 86.78

Evaluation of Teachers by Students

Name of Staff Member : Mr. Ranjit Thomas (Management Studies)
Class and Subject : 2017 - S4MBA Finance-Marketing - RETAIL MANAGEMENT
No. of Students Responded : 8
Date of Evaluation : 5/15/2017
Knowledge of the teacher in the subject
Excellent : 3
Good : 3
Fair : 0
Poor : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 13.39

Teachers willingness to help

Excellent : 3
Good : 4
Fair : 0
Poor : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 5.81

Approximate percentage of classes not engaged by the teacher

Less than 10% : 5
10 to 25% : 1
More than 25% : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 4.59

Whether the teacher dictates notes only without explanation

No : 4
Yes : 4
Blank : 0
Index : 2.34

Teachers ability to organize lectures

Excellent : 5
Satisfactory : 1
Inadequate : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 7.2

Clarity and understandability of teachers explanations

Excellent : 5
Good : 1
Fair : 0
Poor : 2
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 11.04

Does the teacher encourage questioning

Yes : 5
Sometimes : 1
No : 1
Blank : 1
Index : 5.1

Behaviour of the teacher

Pleasant : 6
Indifferent : 0
Unpleasant : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 5.38

Sincerity of the teacher

Sincere : 6
Not Sincere : 0
Unable to judge : 2
Blank : 0
Index : 9.89

Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher

Excellent : 3
Good : 4
Fair : 0
Poor : 1
Blank : 0
Index : 8.93

Speed of presentation
Just right : 6
Too fast : 1
Too slow : 1
Unable to judge : 0
Index : 3.88

Teaching Effectiveness Index : 77.55