Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ares(2014)2068614 - 24/06/2014
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
Consumer Affairs
Product and Service safety
Introduction
The meeting was chaired by the Head of Unit of DG SANCO B3, 'Product and Service
Safety'.
The draft agenda was adopted. A copy of the adopted agenda is attached (Annex 1).
An attendance list is attached (Annex 2).
The draft summary record of the meeting of 04.10.2013 was adopted. The adopted
summary record is attached (Annex 3).
The Chair urged Member States to consider whether the safety requirements contain
elements which would still need to be applied for such products.
Member States sought assurances that other fuels could not be used in such an
appliance especially if other fuels were cheaper, consumers might be tempted to use
them. The industry representative replied that this new alcohol requires 105 degrees
to be ignited. It only works in conjunction with a special wick that can raise the
temperature sufficiently, therefore there is no point in putting this new alcohol in a
traditional ethanol appliance as it would not work. However, it is impossible to
prevent consumers from using ethanol for anything else. Member States commented
that this would require the appliance to have very specific marking in that case. The
industry representative said that the appliance was not yet on the market but that both
the appliance and the fuel bottles would be clearly labelled.
The Chair reminded Member States that as market surveillance authorities they could
ask manufacturers to present their safety assessment of such novelty products.
Since some Member States proposed both substantive and editorial changes to the
text of the safety requirements, and since some Member States were absent, and in
view of the considerations to take into account regarding the new appliance and fuel
presented during the meeting, it was decided to postpone the vote to allow Member
States to consult their experts once more.
The vote took place and the opinion of the Committee was favourable.
The vote took place and the opinion of the Committee was favourable.
The vote took place and the opinion of the Committee was favourable.
One Member State expressed some concerns about the soother standard in writing to
which CEN replied in writing (correspondence shared with other Member States). No
discussion took place as the representative of the Member State concerned was not
present.
8. AOB