06.13.17 Final PC Packet

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011

CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov
LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large) Trinity Haven Schlottman, Chair

Mayor Pro-Tem Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6) Sam Cherry, Vice Chair
Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1) Vicki Quinn
Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5) Todd L. Moody
Councilman Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4) Glenn Trowbridge
Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3) Cedric Crear
Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2) Donna Toussaint
City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell
Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the
Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. Reasonable efforts will be
made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an accommodation to
attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at 702-229-6301 and
advise of your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.
June 13, 2017

6:00 PM
ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR
MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE
REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM MILAGROS ESCUIN, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3RD
FLOOR, (702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITYS WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.
NOTICE: This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:
City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor

Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive
ACTIONS: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES
THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON
FILING OF THE APPLICATION.
ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY
IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE
HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.
Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 1
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:
1. Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and
suggested conditions of approval, if appropriate.
2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is
complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staffs conditions of
approval.
3. If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staffs condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.
4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If
more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and
indicate that he speaks for others in the audience who share his view.
5. Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,
but in the interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups
of interested parties.
6. After all objectors input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.
7. Following the applicants response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst
themselves, ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.
8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps,
models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in
for the record unless requested by the Commission.
As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate
your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE
AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR
THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE
SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
5. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OF MAY 9, 2017.
6. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or
held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.
CONSENT ITEMS:
CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.

7. TMP-70220 - TENTATIVE MAP - SKYE CANYON PARCEL 2.23A - APPLICANT: NINETY FIVE
MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER: KAG DEVELOPMENT WEST, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Tentative Map FOR A 96-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 12.52 acres at the southwest
corner of Eagle Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive (APN 126-12-810-002), T-D (Traditional Development) Zone [ML
(Residential Medium Low) Skye Canyon Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70122]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
8. TMP-70239 - TENTATIVE MAP - SKYE KNOLL - APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES -

OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 173-
LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 24.08 acres on the north side of Crossbridge Drive,
approximately 1,407 feet west of Sky Vista Drive (APN 137-33-810-002), P-C (Planned Community) Zone [SF3 (Single
Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70033]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
9. TMP-70262 - TENTATIVE MAP - SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 24 PARCEL C - APPLICANT: GREYSTONE

NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative
Map FOR A 155-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 23.62 acres at the southeast corner of
Crossbridge Drive and Suncreek Drive, west of Sky Vista Drive (APN 137-34-321-001), P-C (Planned Community) Zone
[SF3 (Single Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70138]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.
10. TMP-70334 - TENTATIVE MAP - SHADOW POINT AT SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 24 PARCEL B -

APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 102-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 27.43 acres on
the south side of Crossbridge Drive, approximately 1,420 feet west of Sky Vista Drive (APN 164-03-114-001), P-C
(Planned Community) Zone [SF3 (Single Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers)
[PRJ-70053]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE
THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.
11. ZON-70234 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible
action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: P-O (PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE) on 0.58 acres at the northeast corner of Adams Avenue and C Street (Reversionary area as shown in Book 153
of Plats, Page 70, formerly APNs 139-27-211-047, 049 and 062), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-70132]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
12. VAR-70218 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VETERANS VILLAGE 2, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE 36
ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A PARKING-IMPAIRED DEVELOPMENT on 4.08 acres
at 50 North 21st Street (APNs 139-35-804-001 and 005), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
69982]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
13. SDR-70217 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-70218 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: VETERANS VILLAGE 2, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development
Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 3,551 SQUARE-FOOT COMMUNITY CENTER, PRIVATE (ACCESSORY) on 4.08
acres at 50 North 21st Street (APNs 139-35-804-001 and 005), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
14. SUP-70226 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER
DISTRICT - OWNER: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A PROPOSED UTILITY INSTALLATION, OTHER THAN LISTED USE at the northwest corner of Centennial
Parkway and Puli Road (portion of APN 126-23-000-003), U (Undeveloped) Zone [PF (Public Facilities) General Plan
Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70136]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
15. SDR-70227 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-70226 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - OWNER: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED UTILITY INSTALLATION,
OTHER THAN LISTED on a portion of 466.72 acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Puli Road (APN
126-23-000-003), U (Undeveloped) Zone [PF (Public Facilities) General Plan Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70136].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
16. SUP-69858 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WAFFLE BAR, LLC - OWNER:
GREAT WASH PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,832
SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE AND 1,141 SQUARE-FOOT
OUTDOOR SEATING AREA WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 141-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
CITY PARK WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120 (APN 138-32-615-001),
C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-69786]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
17. SUP-69983 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LING'S MASSAGE - OWNER:
WEINGARTEN NOSTAT, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,934
SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A PARCEL ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE, A 70-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM
A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP, AND A 358-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SCHOOL AND AN
INDIVIDUAL CARE CENTER WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 1291 South Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190 (APN
162-06-112-011), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-69620]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
18. SUP-70128 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 1908 CEDARVIEW
CIRCLE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) TO AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS I) [CASITA] USE at 1908
Cedarview Circle (APN 163-02-719-040), R-PD5 (Residential Planned Development - 5 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-70004]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
19. SUP-70228 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ZHI GANG WANG - OWNER:
MRA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 4,167 SQUARE-FOOT
RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 75-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION
FROM A CHILD CARE FACILITY WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 8991 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-08-120-
032), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70141]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
20. SDR-70254 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR AN
EXISTING 4,340 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET
IS REQUIRED on 0.60 acres at 501 South Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-34-717-012), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-70146]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
21. SDR-70256 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SDR-70254 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR AN EXISTING 26,364 SQUARE-FOOT HEALTH CLUB WITH A WAIVER TO
ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND
PORTIONS OF THE EAST AND NORTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 3.87 acres at
601 South Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-34-717-011), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-
22. SDR-70258 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SDR-70254 AND SDR-70256 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 251,223 SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER
WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH
PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 7.46 acres at 731, 737, 739, 741, 771, 805, 813, 815, 817,
821, 825, 827, 833 and 837 South Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-34-717-013), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1

23. SDR-70240 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CAPROCK
EMERGENCY HOLDINGS, LLC - OWNER: NORTHWEST 95, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED TWO-STORY, 28,118 SQUARE-FOOT HOSPITAL WITH A WAIVER
TO ALLOW A FOUR-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE SOUTH PROJECT BOUNDARY
WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on a 2.79-acre portion of 15.78 acres at the northeast corner of Oso Blanca Road
and Durango Drive (APN 125-17-701-001), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70056]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

24. ABEYANCE - GPA-69220 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VALLEY
BANK OF NEVADA - OWNER: BANK OF NORTH LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a General
Plan Amendment FROM: DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R (RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) on 11.95 acres at the northeast corner of Trails End Avenue and Homestead Road (APNs 125-05-503-
001 and 002), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-69151]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
25. ABEYANCE - ZON-69224 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-69220 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA - OWNER: BANK OF NORTH LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-D (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-RESTRICTED) on
11.95 acres at the northeast corner of Trails End Avenue and Homestead Road (APNs 125-05-503-001 and 002), Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-69151]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
26. ABEYANCE - GPA-68781 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BRITIM
CONSTRUCTION - OWNER: MATLOCK HOLDINGS IV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General
Plan Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on
2.49 acres at 5097 Roberta Lane (APN 138-13-801-002), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68576]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
27. ABEYANCE - ZON-68782 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-68781 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

BRITIM CONSTRUCTION - OWNER: MATLOCK HOLDINGS IV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION]
TO: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.49 acres at 5097 Roberta Lane (APN 138-13-801-002), Ward 5
(Barlow) [PRJ-68576]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
28. ABEYANCE - SDR-68784 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-68781 AND ZON-
68782 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BRITIM CONSTRUCTION - OWNER: MATLOCK HOLDINGS
IV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 40-UNIT MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 2.49 acres at 5097 Roberta Lane (APN 138-13-801-002), U
(Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] [PROPOSED: R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)], Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68576]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
29. ABEYANCE - VAR-67949 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAMARITAN HOUSE,

INC. - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW SIX PARKING SPACES WHERE 11 SPACES ARE
REQUIRED on 0.19 acres at the northeast corner of Adams Avenue and 4th Street (APN 139-27-603-014), C-V (Civic)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-67708]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
30. ABEYANCE - VAR-69804 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-67949 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: SAMARITAN HOUSE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
THE BACKING OF A MOTOR VEHICLE ONTO A PUBLIC STREET FROM A PARKING AREA WHERE SUCH IS
NOT ALLOWED on 0.19 acres at the northeast corner of Adams Avenue and 4th Street (APN 139-27-603-014), C-V
(Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-67708]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
31. ABEYANCE - SDR-67950 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-67949 AND VAR-
69804 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAMARITAN HOUSE, INC. - For possible action on a
request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 3,060 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING on 0.19 acres at the
northeast corner of Adams Avenue and 4th Street (APN 139-27-603-014), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-
67708]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

32. ABEYANCE - VAR-69639 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHABAD SOUTHERN
NEVADA, INC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN EIGHT-FOOT TALL WROUGHT
IRON FENCE IN THE FRONT YARD WHERE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FIVE FEET IS ALLOWED on 3.03 acres
at 1312 Vista Drive (APN 162-06-501-004), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-69138]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
33. ABEYANCE - SUP-69617 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: EAB INVESTMENT
COMPANY - OWNER: CRPP, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A MINI-
STORAGE FACILITY on the west side of Rancho Drive, 570 feet south of Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-13-512-006), C-
M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-69582]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
34. ABEYANCE - SDR-69618 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-69617 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: EAB INVESTMENT COMPANY - OWNER: CRPP, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY AND OUTDOOR VEHICLE
PARKING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A THREE-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE NORTH
PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on a portion of 4.78 acres on the west side of Rancho Drive,
approximately 570 feet south of Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-13-512-006), C-M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 5
(Barlow) [PRJ-69582]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
35. ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SDR-68686 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKET STREET SUMMERLIN RE, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 72-BED CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING
HOME WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE EIGHT FEET
IS REQUIRED ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, A TWO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED ON A PORTION OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, A SIX-FOOT PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE, AND A 10-FOOT
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED ON A PORTION OF THE SOUTH
PROPERTY LINE on 2.22 acres at 7540 Smoke Ranch Road (APN 138-15-402-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-68685]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
36. MOD-70292 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THE CALIDA GROUP, LLC -
OWNER: R A SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Modification of
the Las Vegas Renaissance Master Development Plan and Development Standards dated April 15, 2011 TO AMEND
THE LAND USE PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS on 23.40 acres located at the southeast corner of
Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard (APNs 138-32-312-013 and 138-32-723-003), PD (Planned Development) Zone, Ward
2 (Beers) [PRJ-70123]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
37. SDR-70293 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MOD-70292 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: THE CALIDA GROUP, LLC - OWNER: R A SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A 359-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT on 15.60 acres located adjacent to the south side of Alta Drive, 300 feet east of Rampart Boulevard
(APN 138-32-723-003), PD (Planned Development) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70123]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
38. ZON-70263 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR
CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.05 acres at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and
Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
39. VAR-70264 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70263 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA,
LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 307
PARKING SPACES WHERE 364 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 1.05 acres at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and
Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1
(Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

40. VAR-70265 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70263 AND VAR-70264 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance
TO ALLOW ZERO-FOOT FRONT AND CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED, A
FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A FIVE-FOOT REAR YARD
SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.05 acres at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and Maryland
Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited
Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
41. SUP-70266 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-70264 AND VAR-70265 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible
action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT at the northwest corner of Lewis
Avenue and Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
42. SUP-70267 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265 AND SUP-70266 -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A LOUNGE BAR USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 70-
FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND AN 80-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A SCHOOL WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and
Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1
43. VAC-70268 - VACATION RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266 AND SUP-70267 -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For
possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a portion of a 20-foot wide public alley west of Maryland Parkway,
between Lewis Avenue and Bridger Avenue, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
44. SDR-70269 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-
70266, SUP-70267 AND VAC-70268 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER:
BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 15-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONTAINING 193 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
AND 28,817 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF
LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES WHERE
15 FEET IS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE
NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED, AND TO ALLOW ZERO PERIMETER TREES
WHERE 34 ARE REQUIRED on 1.05 acres at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and Maryland Parkway (APN'S
139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)],
Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
45. ZON-70273 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL)
on 0.33 acres at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
46. VAR-70275 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70273 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR

CASCADIA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 77 PARKING SPACES WHERE 153
SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.33 acres at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-
098), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69852].
Staff recommends DENIAL.
47. VAR-70280 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70273 AND VAR-70275 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW FIVE-
FOOT FRONT, SIDE AND CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A FIVE-
FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.33 acres at the southwest corner of Lewis
Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited

48. SUP-70281 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70273, VAR-70275 AND VAR-70280 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-
712-098), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69852].
49. SUP-70284 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280 AND SUP-70281-
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 230-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND A 240-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
SCHOOL WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-
712-098), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69852].
50. SDR-70285 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-
70281 AND SUP-70284 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 15-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
CONTAINING 60 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 8,014 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE
WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE EAST
AND NORTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF LANDSCAPE
BUFFERING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED, AND
TO ALLOW ZERO PERIMETER TREES WHERE 19 ARE REQUIRED on 0.33 acres at the southwest corner of Lewis
Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited
51. VAR-70236 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RAINBOW DREAMS

EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 51 PARKING
SPACES WHERE 57 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 2.15 acres at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard (APNs
139-21-601-016 and 017; 139-21-612-049, 050 and 080), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-70024]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
APPLICANT/OWNER: RAINBOW DREAMS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, ET AL - For possible action on a
request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132) FOR A
PROPOSED TEMPORARY DEVELOPMENT TO ADD THREE MODULAR BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING
PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY on 2.15 acres at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard (APNs 139-21-601-016 and 017; 139-
21-612-049, 050 and 080), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-70024]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
53. VAR-70253 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC. - OWNER:
UNION LOCAL 872 LABORER'S INTL. - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 34 PARKING
SPACES WHERE 48 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.97 acres on the south side of Bonanza Road,
approximately 800 feet west of Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-501-008), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3
(Coffin) [PRJ-68724]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
APPLICANT: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC. - OWNER: UNION LOCAL 872 LABORER'S INTL. - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 8,320 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL
RETAIL STORE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A NON-COHERENT DESIGN WHERE CONSISTENT
DETAILING AND FINISH IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SIDES OF THE BUILDING on 0.97 acres on the south side of
Bonanza Road, approximately 800 feet west of Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-501-008), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68724]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
55. VAR-70259 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME
AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO SIDEWALK,
CURB AND GUTTER, WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007),
M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-70051]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

56. VAR-70472 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-70259 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CONCRETE
SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW A TEN-FOOT SIDE SETBACK WHERE 50 FEET IS REQUIRED, AND TO ALLOW
EXISTING OUTDOOR STORAGE WITHIN THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK AREA on 0.61 acres at 4515
Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-70051]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
57. SDR-70261 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-70259 AND VAR-70472 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ -
For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING 2,784
SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO A CONTRACTOR'S PLANT, SHOP AND STORAGE YARD
WITH WAIVERS OF PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER STANDARDS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET ALONG THE
NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED, AND TO ALLOW ZERO
FEET ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW AN EIGHT-FOOT
TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH SCREENING ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE
AN EIGHT-FOOT TALL SOLID STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED FOR SCREENING on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street
(APN 138-03-602-007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-70051]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
58. VAR-70276 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER:
PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO SIDEWALK,
CURB AND GUTTER WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-008),
M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-70049]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
59. VAR-70277 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-70276 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST

SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance
TO ALLOW EXISTING OUTDOOR STORAGE WITHIN THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK AREA on 0.62
acres at 4505 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-008), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-70049]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
60. SDR-70279 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-70276 AND VAR-70277 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC -
For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING 2,092
SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO A CONTRACTOR'S PLANT, SHOP AND STORAGE YARD
WITH WAIVERS OF PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER STANDARDS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET ALONG THE
SOUTH, WEST, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED AND
ZERO FEET ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam
Street (APN 138-03-602-008), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-70049]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
61. VAR-70397 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CIM BG LAS VEGAS, LLC, ET AL -
For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 10-FOOT TALL WALL IN THE FRONT SETBACK
AREA WHERE FIVE FEET WITH THE TOP THREE FEET BEING 50 PERCENT OPEN IS THE MAXIMUM
ALLOWED on 1.28 acres at 200 East Ogden Avenue (APNs 139-34-510-001 through 004), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-70176]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
62. SUP-70395 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-70397 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
CIM BG LAS VEGAS, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED
44,133 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 34-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) WHERE 1,500 FEET IS
REQUIRED at 200 East Ogden Avenue (APNs 139-34-510-001 through 004), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5
63. SUP-70396 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-70397 AND SUP-70395 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: CIM BG LAS VEGAS, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED NIGHT CLUB USE at 200 East Ogden Avenue (APNs 139-34-510-001 through 004), C-2
(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-70176]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

64. SDR-70398 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-70397, SUP-70395 AND SUP-70396 -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CIM BG LAS VEGAS, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a
request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 8,074 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL
RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (OUTDOOR) USE, THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING SECURITY BUILDING
TO A 1,918 SQUARE-FOOT CAFE/TAVERN, AND THE CONVERSION OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF AN EXISTING
PARKING GARAGE TO A 34,141 SQUARE-FOOT HOTEL MEETING ROOM AND FITNESS CENTER on 1.28
acres at 200 East Ogden Avenue (APNs 139-34-510-001 through 004), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow)
65. VAR-69628 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JEFFREY M. AND MICHELLE D.

MUEHLEISEN - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN EXISTING ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [CARPORT] TO BE IN FRONT OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE WHERE SUCH IS NOT
ALLOWED, A ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE THREE FEET IS REQUIRED AND A ZERO-FOOT
SEPARATION FROM THE MAIN DWELLING WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.17 acres at 1320 Maplegrove
Circle (APN 138-26-513-071), R-CL (Single-Family Compact-Lot) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68711]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
66. VAR-69668 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ANGELA MURILLO - For possible
action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A TWO-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK AND A FOUR-FOOT SIDE
YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING PATIO COVER on 0.06 acres located at
5663 Foxglove Fields Street (APN 125-27-819-001), R-PD8 (Residential Planned Development - 8 Units per Acre) Zone,
Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68720]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
67. VAR-70086 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GUERRERO AND MARIA DIAZ - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 13-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS
REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK
WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE CLASS II (CASITA) on 0.46 acres
at 1721 South Tioga Way (APN 163-03-201-010), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-68197]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
68. VAR-70118 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MICHAEL AND MARSHA

VENDETTI - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A TWO-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK
WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED ATTACHED PATIO COVER on 0.05 acres located at 10411
Lilac Square Avenue (APN 126-13-816-077), PD (Planned Development) Zone [ML (Medium Low Density Residential)
Cliff's Edge Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-69924]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
69. VAR-70190 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: KOBYJAKE FAMILY TRUST - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FOUR-FOOT SIDE YARD AND A SEVEN-FOOT REAR
YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT SEPARATION FROM THE
PRIMARY DWELLING WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
(CLASS II) [RECREATION ROOM] on 0.43 acres located at 7421 Mystic Stream Street (APN 125-15-313-011), R-PD2
(Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-69872]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
70. VAR-70289 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GEORGE AND SHERI BRINKMAN - OWNER:
BRINKMAN FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FOUR-FOOT
SIDE YARD SETBACK AND A FIVE-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN
EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [DETACHED PATIO COVER]; AND A ONE-FOOT
SEPARATION FROM THE PRIMARY DWELLING FOR AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II)
[SHED] WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.36 acres at 7520 Stone Lake Street (APN 125-15-311-008), R-PD2
(Residential Planned Development - 2 Units Per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70175]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
71. VAR-70196 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RONALD YOSHIMITSU HIRAHARA

TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN EXISTING EIGHT-FOOT TALL SOLID
WALL WITH TWO FEET OF RAZOR WIRE ALONG THE SIDE AND REAR PROPERTY LINES WHERE A
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF EIGHT FEET IS ALLOWED on 1.06 acres at 800 West Bonanza Road (APN 139-28-703-016)
C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-69787]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

72. SUP-69672 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FREMONT FOOD EMPORIUM -
OWNER: HS FAMILY, LP - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 3,015
SQUARE-FOOT TAVERN-LIMITED USE at 310 Fremont Street (APN 139-34-510-024), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-69516]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
73. SUP-69674 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-69672 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
FREMONT FOOD EMPORIUM - OWNER: HS FAMILY, LP - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED 6,869 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) USE WITH WAIVERS
TO ALLOW A 80-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN)
AND A 1,158-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE
1,500 FEET IS REQUIRED at 310 Fremont Street (APN 139-34-510-024), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5
74. SDR-69675 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-69672 AND SUP-69674 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: FREMONT FOOD EMPORIUM - OWNER: HS FAMILY, LP - For possible action on
a request for a Site Development Plan Review TO ADD 6,869 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA TO AN EXISTING
7,488 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH FACADE IMPROVEMENTS on 0.22 acres at 310 Fremont
Street (APN 139-34-510-024), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-69516]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
75. SUP-70160 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: M.W., LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-55272) FOR A WAIVER TO
ALLOW ONE PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN THAT EXCEEDS THE 30 SQUARE-FOOT MAXIMUM
ALLOWED at 1112 South Commerce Street (APN 162-04-506-007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69725].
76. SUP-70205 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: STRUCTURA BODY THERAPIES -
OWNER: CENTENNIAL DAY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED
1,360 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE SEPARATION
OF ZERO FEET FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND A 66-FOOT SEPARATION FROM A
RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 7830 West Ann Road, Suite #140 (APN 125-28-818-007), C-
2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70183]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
77. SUP-70219 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: POS PAQUE? TAKOS, LLC -
OWNER: THE HASSAN SOLTANI TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit TO ALLOW
AN EXISTING OPEN AIR VENDING USE (TACO TRAILER) TO BE LOCATED 72 FEET FROM
RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY AND TO ALLOW HOURS OF OPERATION FROM 10:00 A.M. TO 10:00
P.M. at 1468 East Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-02-110-008), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
78. SUP-70244 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAURINCE LOVELIFE - OWNER:
THOMAS AND YOLANDA MASON - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED
SHORT-TERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 660 FEET IS REQUIRED at 2323 Palomino Lane (APN 139-32-802-
005), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-70194]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
79. SDR-70206 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: NEON
MUSEUM - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A 1,250 SQUARE-FOOT
ADDITION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC MUSEUM WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE NORTH, EAST, AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET IS
REQUIRED AND A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE
WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.27 acres at 714 North Las Vegas Boulevard (APN 139-27-812-011), C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-69891]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
80. MSP-70249 - MASTER SIGN PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Master Sign Plan FOR AN APPROVED 98,359 SQUARE-FOOT
SHOPPING CENTER on 9.63 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-
001, 002 and 010), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70117]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

81. SDR-70252 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MSP-70249 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment
of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-66447) FOR SITE MODIFICATIONS TO AN APPROVED 98,359
SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW THE SERVICE AREA TO BE LOCATED AT
THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY WHERE REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED AT A REAR, SIDE OR INTERNAL
PROPERTY LOCATION on 9.63 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-
301-001, 002 and 010), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70117]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:
82. NOTE: NOT TO BE HEARD BEFORE 9:00PM
DIR-70539 - DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND CO, LLC, ET
AL - For possible action on a request for a Development Agreement between 180 Land Co, LLC, et al. and the City of Las
Vegas on 250.92 acres at the southwest corner of Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard (APNs 138-31-201-005; 138-31-601-
008; 138-31-702-003 and 004; 138-31-801-002 and 003; 138-32-202-001; and 138-32-301-005 and 007), Ward 2 (Beers)
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:
83. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE
LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY
BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS
SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Agenda Item No.: 1.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 13, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO
SUBJECT:
CALL TO ORDER
Agenda Item No.: 2.

SUBJECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
Agenda Item No.: 3.

SUBJECT:
ROLL CALL
Agenda Item No.: 4.

SUBJECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO
THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF
DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
Agenda Item No.: 5.

SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 9, 2017.
Agenda Item No.: 6.

DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the
applicant wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and
acted upon at this time.
Agenda Item No.: 7.

SUBJECT:
TMP-70220 - TENTATIVE MAP - SKYE CANYON PARCEL 2.23A - APPLICANT:
NINETY FIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER: KAG DEVELOPMENT WEST, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 96-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 12.52 acres at the southwest corner of Eagle Canyon
Avenue and Egan Crest Drive (APN 126-12-810-002), T-D (Traditional Development) Zone
[ML (Residential Medium Low) Skye Canyon Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-
MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 7/19/2017

OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Skye Canyon Approval Letter
7. Clark County School District - School Development Tracking Form
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: JUNE 13, 2017
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: NINETY FIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER:
KAG DEVELOPMENT WEST, LLC
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TMP-70220 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 23
NOTICES MAILED N/A
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Conditions Page One
June 13, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting
** CONDITIONS **
TMP-70220 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final
Map is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map
within four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.
2. Street names must be provided in accordance with the Citys Street Naming
Regulations.
3. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.
4. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-

interest community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and
Restrictions (CC&R), or conveyance of any unit within the community, the
Developer is required to record a Declaration of Private Maintenance
Requirements (DPMR) as a covenant on all associated properties, and on behalf
of all current and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a listing of all
privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with
assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief
description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained
components. The DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement
that all properties within the community are subject to assessment for all
associated costs should private maintenance obligations not be met, and the City
of Las Vegas be required to provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to
include a statement of obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following
recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R
documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.
5. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State

Subdivision Statutes.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
6. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public
Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage
Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association.
7. Per condition of approval #14 of the Skye Canyon II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-
65803), grant Pedestrian Access Easements for all sidewalks located outside of
the public street right of way by adding a note within the Owner's Certificate on
each Final Map to read, "A minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian walkway easement is
hereby granted overlying all sidewalks located in common areas abutting public
streets, where such sidewalks are not located within public street right of way,
together with the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom these easements."
8. If not already constructed or guaranteed by the master developer, construct half

street improvements on Eagle Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive including
appropriate overpaving (where legally able) adjacent to this site concurrent with
development. Install all appurtenant underground facilities, if any, adjacent to this
site needed for the future traffic signal system concurrent with development of this
site. Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc.,
located within public rights-of-way, past the boundaries of this site prior to
construction of hard surfacing (asphalt or concrete). Per condition #17of the Skye
Canyon II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-65803), if not already constructed or
guaranteed by the master developer, a minimum two lanes of asphalt pavement on
village streets providing the main access to this site and a working sanitary sewer
connection shall be provided prior to a final inspection of any dwelling units within
this Tentative Map.
9. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections. Per
condition of approval # 19 of the Skye Canyon II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-
65803), landscaping within calculated Site Visibility Restriction Zones (SVRZs) will
be limited in height by the City Traffic Engineer.
10. Grant a minimum 20-foot wide Public Sewer Easement on Common Elements B
and J where public sewer lines are proposed. No structures, and no trees or
vegetation taller than three feet, shall be allowed within any Public Sewer
Easements. A note to this affect shall appear on the Final Map of this site.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Conditions Page Three
11. This site will be a part of Special Improvement District 609. Prior to the release of
a Final Map for recordation on this site, the property owner must contact the
Special Improvement District Section of the Department of Public Works (702-229-
2136) acknowledging a per lot assessment of all lots that will be created through a
Final Map for this site. The City shall prepare an apportionment report following
recordation of the Final Map.
12. A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of
any units within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major
access streets, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall
and adjacent public street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to
issuance of any building permits beyond 50% of all units within this development.
All off-site improvements adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped
areas between the perimeter walls and adjacent public streets, shall be
constructed and accepted prior to issuance of building permits beyond 75%. The
above thresholds notwithstanding, all required improvements shall be constructed
in accordance with the approved Development Agreement.
13. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building
or grading permits, submittal of any construction drawings or the submittal of a
Map subdividing this site, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all
drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer
of this site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage
facility improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood
Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development
of this site.
14. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative
Map is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size,
type and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer
and drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction
plans by the City. A deviation from Standard Drawing #211 is hereby approved.
No other deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific
written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation
of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision-related construction plans, whichever
may occur first. If such approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map
must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.
15. Comply with all applicable conditions of approval for the Sky Canyon II Parent
Tentative Map (TMP-65803) and any other site related actions.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page One
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a 96-lot single family residential subdivision on 12.52 acres within the
Skye Canyon Master Plan Area.
ISSUES
This is a 96-lot residential development to be built to Kyle R-CL Single Family

Compact Lot District standards in accordance with the approved Kyle Canyon
Development Standards and Architectural Design Guidelines revised on July 20,
2016. Staff recommends approval of this map request.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is part of the Skye Canyon Master Plan Area, which is governed
by a Development Agreement between the Master Developer and the City of Las
Vegas, as well as the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Architectural Design
Guidelines originally adopted on October 21, 2011.
The Skye Canyon Land Use Plan designates the subject property as ML (Medium-Low
Density Residential), which allows up to 15 residential units per gross acre with an
average of 8.49 units per acre. The proposed density of 7.67 dwelling units per unit falls
within the maximum allowed. The dwelling units will be constructed to the Skye Canyon
R-CL (Single Family Compact Lot) standard, which calls for a single family detached
product with a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet. All proposed lot sizes are greater
than 3,045 square feet.
The submitted east/west cross section depicts maximum natural grade greater than two
percent across the site. Per the Skye Canyon Development Standards, all development
is allowed a maximum 8-foot perimeter retaining wall. A 8-foot maximum retaining wall
is shown on the west property line, a 6-foot maximum retaining wall is shown on the
east property line and no retaining walls are shown along the north and south property
lines.
The Clark County School District projects that approximately 42 primary and secondary
school students would be generated by the proposed development on this site. Of the
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Two
three schools serving the area (Bozarth Elementary School, Escobedo Middle School
and Arbor View High School), the District notes that Bozarth Elementary School and
Arbor View High School are over capacity for the 2016-17 school year, and no new
schools are planned in this area at this time.
FINDINGS (TMP-70220)
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to the approved Skye Canyon Development
Agreement, the approved Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Architectural
Guidelines, and the minimum requirements set forth by Title 19 for Tentative Maps.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of this application with conditions.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

The City Council approved a Resolution (R-176-2004) adopting
12/01/04
guidelines for development within the Kyle Canyon Gateway area
The City Council approved a request (GPA-9167) to amend a portion
of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan of the General Plan to change land
use designations from PCD (Planned Community Development), SC
01/18/06 (Service Commercial) and PF (Public Facilities) to TND (Traditional
Neighborhood Development) on 1,712 acres generally located north of
Grand Teton Drive, between Puli Road and Fort Apache Road. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request to amend the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways (MSH-21013) to select the Northern Alternative
Freeway/Expressway Alignment for Sheep Mountain Parkway and to
05/16/07
remove the Southern Alternative Freeway/Expressway Alignment from
the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DIR-21605)
between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the city of Las Vegas on
1,712 acres at the southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and
Moccasin Road for the development of the Kyle Canyon Master Plan.
05/16/07
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. In a
related item, the City Council voted to approve a Parks Agreement
between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the city of Las Vegas. Staff
recommended approval.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Three

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-20543)
from U (Undeveloped) [TND (Traditional Neighborhood Development)
General Plan Designation] and R-E (Residence Estates) to T-D
(Traditional Development) on 1,712 acres at the southwest corner of
05/16/07
Fort Apache Road and Moccasin Road. The Kyle Canyon
Development Standards and Design Guidelines were approved as part
of this action. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5910, thereby adopting the
05/16/07 Development Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and
the city of Las Vegas.
The Development Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC
and the City of Las Vegas was recorded in the Office of the County
06/20/07 Recorder. The approved Parks Agreement was recorded together with
the Development Agreement. This is the effective date of the
Development Agreement.
The City Council approved a Major Modification (MOD-22589) of the
Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines to
08/08/07 realign Iron Mountain Road between Hualapai and Grand Canyon
Drive, and to add street cross sections. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-21949) 15.56
acres generally located on the south side of Kyle Canyon Road,
approximately 1,030 feet east of Shaumber Road; and a Petition to
09/05/07 Annex (ANX-21950) 5.15 acres generally located on the south side of
Kyle Canyon Road, east of Alpine Ridge Way. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval. The effective date of
the annexations was 09/14/07.
The City Council approved a request (GPA-20469) to amend the
Centennial Hills Sector Plan of the General Plan to change land use
designations from PCD (Planned Community Development) and SC
(Service Commercial) to TND (Traditional Neighborhood
Development) on 7.27 acres on the west side of Oso Blanca Road,
approximately 2,190 feet south of Kyle Canyon Road. The City Council
09/19/07 also approved a Rezoning (ZON-22351) from U (Undeveloped) [PCD
(Planned Community Development) General Plan Designation], C-1
(Limited Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial) to TD
(Traditional Development) on the same 7.27 acres. This action also
updated the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design
Guidelines. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Four

The City Council approved a request (ZON-20475) to establish a
Gaming Enterprise Overlay District on 51.38 acres at the southeast
corner of Hualapai Way and Oso Blanca Road. The City Council also
09/19/07
approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-20478) for a Non-Restricted
Gaming use on this site. The Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a request (MSH-25695) to amend the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways to rename Horse Drive west of
Grand Canyon Drive to Kyle Heights Parkway; to realign a portion of
the Iron Mountain Road alignment between Horse Drive and the
Northern Beltway; to reclassify various streets as identified by the
special design designations adopted as part of the Kyle Canyon
Development Standards and Design Guidelines; and to add or remove
02/06/08 various roadway segments. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval. The City Council also approved a Major
Modification (MOD-25875) of the Kyle Canyon Development
Standards and Design Guidelines to amend various street names and
to clarify street cross section drawings within the Community. A
subsequent Street Name Change application will be required prior to
issuance of the first residential permit in the Community. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council tabled a Petition to Vacate a BLM right-of-way grant
generally located north of Grand Teton Drive, south of Moccasin Road,
between Puli Road and Fort Apache Road (VAC-23811). The area to
be vacated was the original alignment of Sheep Mountain Parkway.
02/06/08 The Planning Commission and staff had recommended approval. The
Petition cannot record until Section 1 Land, Providence Land, and
On-Property Land are dedicated to the city for creation of the right-of-
way for the northern alignment of Sheep Mountain Parkway, pursuant
to Subsection 7.05(a)(v) of the Development Agreement.
The City Council approved a required review (DIR-28767) of a
development report pursuant to Subsection 9.01 of the Kyle Canyon
08/06/08
Development Agreement. Staff recommended approval. A condition of
approval required a follow-up review on 10/01/08.
Wachovia Bank, National Association, acting as the managing creditor
of 41 creditors, foreclosed on the Kyle Canyon property. A new entity
09/23/08
called KAG Property, LLC was formed to assume ownership of the
Kyle Canyon property.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Five

The City Council approved a follow-up required review (DIR-29916) of
a development report pursuant to Subsection 9.01 of the Kyle Canyon
12/03/08 Development Agreement between the city of Las Vegas and Kyle
Acquisition Group, LLC (abeyed from 10/01/08). Staff recommended
approval.
Notice of Noncompliance and Opportunity to Cure was sent to KAG
02/02/09 Property, LLC for failure to commence construction of Indian Hills Park
prior to 09/13/08.
The City Council approved the required review (DIR-34955) of a
08/05/09 development report pursuant to Subsection 9.01 of the Kyle Canyon
Development Agreement. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-35315) of a
previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-20478) for a proposed
09/02/09
Non-Restricted Gaming Facility at the southwest corner of Oso Blanca
Road and Hualapai Way alignment. Staff recommended approval.
The Master Developer presented to the city a summary report from
Hart Howerton Strategic Planning Consultants outlining a strategic
10/02/09
plan and recommendations for development of the Kyle Canyon
property.
The City Council approved a required review (DIR-38680) of a
08/04/10 development report pursuant to Subsection 9.01 of the Kyle Canyon
Development Agreement. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request or possible action on a request
for required review (DIR-42369) of a development report as required
08/17/11 by Subsection 9.01 of that certain Development Agreement between
the city of Las Vegas and Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC dated August 8,
2007. Staff recommended approval.
10/19/11
The City Council approved a request to Amend the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways (GPA-41958) to realign Sheep Mountain
11/16/11 Parkway between Grand Teton Drive and Fort Apache Road and
delete master planned roadways within the Kyle Canyon master plan
area. Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Vacate (VAC-
11/16/11 42250) portions of the Sheep Mountain Parkway right-of-way grant.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Six

The City Council approved a request regarding the amending of the
Development Agreement (DIR-42266) for the Kyle Canyon
Development on approximately 1,662 acres at the southwest corner of
11/16/11
Fort Apache Road and Moccasin Road. Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval. The Development Agreement (Doc.
#201206260000001) was recorded on 06/26/12.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-53058) for
a 45- lot subdivision (Parent Tentative Map) on 1,661.8 acres
04/08/14
approximately 1,800 feet north of Horse Drive on the west side of Oso
Blanca Road. Staff recommended approval.
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review
(FMP- 53700) for a proposed four-pod residential subdivision (Skye
05/08/14
Canyon Phase 1 Parent Map) on 163.65 acres at the northwest corner
of Grand Teton Drive and Grand Canyon Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-53843)
Bureau of Land Management Right-of-Way Grant Easement generally
06/10/14
located north of the northern alignment of Grand Teton Drive between
Hualapai Way and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff recommended approval.
a 173-lot single-family subdivision (Skye Canyon Parcel 1.2) on 37.99
06/10/14
acres on the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Grand Canyon
Drive. Staff recommended approval.
06/10/14
acres on the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Hualapai
Way. Staff recommended approval.
06/10/14
acres on the northwest corner of Grand Teton Drive and Grand
Canyon Drive. Staff recommended approval.
07/08/14
acres on the southeast corner of Horse Drive and Hualapai Way. Staff
The City Council approved a request or possible action on a request
for required review (DIR-54776) of a development report as required
08/06/14 by Subsection 9.01 of that certain Development Agreement between
the city of Las Vegas and Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC dated August 8,
2007. Staff recommended approval.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Seven

11/05/14
The Planning Commission approve a Petition to Vacate (VAC-56656)
a four-foot wide pedestrian access easement generally located
12/09/14
approximately 1,461 feet east of the intersection of Hualapai Way and
Eagle Canyon Avenue. Staff recommended approval.
(FMP- 56855) for a 125-lot single-family residential subdivision (Skye
12/10/14 Canyon Parcel 1.3 Phase 1) on 25.49 acres on the north side of
Grand Teton Drive, approximately 1,210 feet west of Grand Canyon
Drive. The map recorded on 02/11/15 (Book 148, Page 67).
12/10/14 Canyon Parcel 1.1 Phase 1) on 19.85 acres at the southwest corner
of Horse Drive and Skye Park Drive. The map recorded on 02/11/15
(Book 148, Page 65).
(FMP- 57264) for an 84-lot single-family residential subdivision (Skye
01/06/15
Canyon Parcel 1.3 Phase 2) on 15.41 acres at the northeast corner
of Grand Teton Drive and Hualapai Way. The map has yet to record.
01/07/15
Canyon Parcel 1.1 Phase 2) on 15.43 acres at the southeast corner
of Horse Drive and Hualapai Way. The map recorded on 8/17/15
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-55892) to allow
deviations from the Street Naming Guidelines and Street Naming
Configuration sections of the City of Las Vegas Street Naming and
Addressing Assignment Regulations, 2009 Edition on Horse Drive
01/21/15
between the US 95 and Iron Mountain Road, Fort Apache Road
between the US 95 and Moccasin Road, as well as on Hualapai Way
from Grand Teton Drive to Moccasin Road, respectively. The Planning
The City Council approved a request a Street Name Change (SNC-
55060) from Horse Drive tot: W Skye Canyon Park Dr (between the
US 95 and Iron Mountain Road); from Fort Apache Road to N Skye
01/21/15 Canyon Park Dr (between the US 95 and Moccasin Road); and from
Hualapai Way to Skye Village Road (between Grand Teton Drive and
Moccasin Road). The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Eight

02/18/15 Canyon Parcel 1.4 Phase 2) on 33.61 acres on the northwest corner
of Grand Teton Drive and Grand Canyon Drive. The map recorded on
06/02/15.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA- 56951)
to amend the Public Facilities & Building Element of the Las Vegas
03/18/15 2020 Master Plan. This amendment eliminates e the Nevada Energy
Substation and associate corridor within the Kyle Canyon Master
Planned Community
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-57816) for
04/15/15 the 2nd amendment to the Kyle Canyon Development agreement. The
Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval on 03/10/15.
Department of Planning staff approved an administrative site plan
05/04/15 (SDR-58930) for a conceptual review of Skye Canyon parks 1.5, 1.6,
and 2.13.
The Planning Commission approved a Parent Tentative Map (TMP-
58560) for a proposed 66-lot mixed use subdivision at the northeast
05/12/15
corner of Grand Teton Drive and Puli Drive. Staff had recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-59826)
regarding the adoption of a parks agreement accompanying the 2 nd
07/15/15
amendment to the Sky Canyon development agreement. Staff and the
Planning Commission had recommend approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
60399) to allow a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) within a community
09/08/15
recreational facility at the southwest corner of West Skye Canyon Park
Dr. and Skye Village Road. Staff had recommend approval.
The City Council approved a Major Modification (MOD-62679) to the
Kyle Canyon Development Standards to amend the Blended Use
03/16/16
Design Guidelines. Staff and the Planning Commission had
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan review
for a 265,108 square-foot shopping center at the northeast corner of
05/10/16
Skye Park Drive and West Skye Canyon Park Drive. Staff had
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-63962) for
07/20/16 the 3rd amendment to the Kyle Canyon Development agreement. The
Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval on 06/14/16.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Nine

The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-65021)
regarding the adoption of a parks agreement accompanying the 3 rd
07/20/16
amendment to the Sky Canyon development agreement. Staff had
recommend approval.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
(TMP-65803) for an 86-lot Mixed Use subdivision on 1,502 acres at
the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Puli Drive.
09/13/16
(TMP-65808) for a 102-lot single family subdivision on 16.81 acres on
the southeast corner of Eagle Canyon Avenue and Shaumber Road.
10/11/16 (TMP-66276) for an 88-lot single family subdivision on 16.66 acres at
the northeast corner of Eagle Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive.
(TMP-65809) for a 65-lot single family subdivision on 17.09 acres at
11/01/16
the northwest corner of Eagle Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive.

(TMP-67366) for a 100-lot single-family residential subdivision on
01/10/17
22.60 acres at the northwest corner of Grand Teton Drive and Skye
Village Road.
04/11/17 (TMP-69228) for a 102-lot single-family subdivision on 18.90 acres on
the southeast corner of Eagle Canyon Avenue and Shaumber Road.
Most Recent Change of Ownership

03/07/17 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

There are no building permits or business licenses related to the subject site.
Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal
04/20/17
requirements for a Tentative Map were discussed.
Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood Meeting was not required, nor was one held.
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Ten
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check where the subject site was
05/04/17 observed. This is an undeveloped portion of the Skye Canyon Master
Plan.
Details of Application Request

Site Area
Net Acres 12.52
Existing Land Planned or Special

Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
TND (Traditional
Subject T-D (Traditional
Undeveloped Neighborhood
Property Development)
Development)
TND (Traditional
T-D (Traditional
North Undeveloped Neighborhood
Development)
Development)
TND (Traditional
T-D (Traditional
South Undeveloped Neighborhood
Development)
Development)
TND (Traditional
T-D (Traditional
East Undeveloped Neighborhood
Development)
Development)
TND (Traditional
T-D (Traditional
West Undeveloped Neighborhood
Development)
Development)
Master Plan Areas Compliance

Skye Canyon Master Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
T-D (Traditional Development) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails (Skye Canyon) N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Eleven
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to Kyle Canyon R-CL (Single Family Compact Lot) Development

Standards, the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 2,000 SF 3,045 SF Y
Min. Lot Width 26 Feet 35 Feet Y
From Interior Street
3 to Second Story
Living over Garage
5 to Porch
10 to Single Story
Living
14 to Second Story
Living
<5 or 18+ to face of
Garage Door
From Court Street or
Drive Aisle 10 to
3 to Second Story Single Story
Min. Setbacks Living over Garage Living Y
Front 3 to Porch 20 to face
5 to Single Story of Garage
Living
5 to Second Story
Living
<5 or18+ to face of
Garage Door
From Paseo or
Common Open
Space
0 to Porch
0 to Single Story
Living
0 to Second Story
Living
Side 6 (combined both
sides) 5 Y
5 to Porch, Portico or
Corner similar element 5 to porch
10 to Living 10 to Living Y
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Twelve
Rear (with no Alley) 5 5 Y

Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet N/A N/A
Max. Lot Coverage 70 % N/A N/A
Max. Building Height 38 Feet N/A N/A
Functional Actual Compliance

Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Kyle Canyon
Eagle Canyon Minor Collector
Development 43 Feet Y
Avenue Street
Standards
Kyle Canyon
Egan Crest Major Collector
Development 67 Feet Y
Drive Street
Standards
19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element # Links # Nodes
Internal Street 9 -
Intersection Internal - 8
Cul-de-sac Terminus - 1
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus - -
Intersection Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
- -
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted - -
Total 9 9
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes): N/A 1.00
Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance

43-foot wide right-of-
43-foot wide right-of-
way, with an adjacent
way, with an adjacent
17-foot wide common
17-foot wide common
Eagle Canyon Avenue lot including a six- Y
lot including a six-foot
foot sidewalk and
sidewalk and varying
varying landscape
landscape width
width
JB
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance

67-foot wide right-of- 67-foot wide right-of-
way, with an adjacent way, with an adjacent
25-foot wide common 25-foot wide common
Egan Crest Drive lot including a eight- lot including a eight- Y
foot sidewalk and foot sidewalk and
varying landscape varying landscape
width width
way, including five- way, including five-
Private Street - Interior foot sidewalk and 2.5- foot sidewalk and Y
foot roll type curb and 2.5- foot roll type
gutter curb and gutter
way, including five- way, including five-
Private Street Interior
foot sidewalk and 2.5- foot sidewalk and Y
(Stub Street)
foot roll type curb and 2.5-foot roll type
gutter curb and gutter
JB
TMP-70220

TMP-70220
TMP-70220 - REVISED

TMP-70220

TMP-70220 - REVISED

TMP-70220

TMP-70220

TMP-70220
TMP-70220 [PRJ-70122] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT: NINETY FIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER: KAG
DEVELOPMENT WEST, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAGLE CANYON AVENUE AND EGAN CREST DRIVE
05/04/2017

TMP-70220 - REVISED
b77b
77AA7b
A77
b777
7777777
777
7777
777 %7b7b77
77
7
7b777
77777777777777
77777%7b777777
%7b7b77777777777
777%7b7b
777777777777
7
%7b777
777%777777

77777

TMP-70220
TMP-70220
Agenda Item No.: 8.

SUBJECT:
TMP-70239 - TENTATIVE MAP - SKYE KNOLL - APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN
HOMES - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Tentative Map FOR A 173-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on
24.08 acres on the north side of Crossbridge Drive, approximately 1,407 feet west of Sky Vista
Drive (APN 137-33-810-002), P-C (Planned Community) Zone [SF3 (Single Family Detached)
Summerlin Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70033]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. The Howard Hughes Corporation Approval Letter
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES - OWNER:
HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TMP-70239 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED N/A
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
2. All development shall conform to the Conditions of Approval of Rezoning (Z-0119-

96), the Summerlin West Development Agreement and the Summerlin
Development Standards.
Regulations.

RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
Conditions Page Two

Public Works
7. A revision to the Summerlin Village 24 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

reflecting the proposed increase in residential units shall be submitted and
approved prior to the submittal of any civil improvements drawings.
8. A 20-foot easement over public sewer lines must be maintained for all sewer lines
on this site. Grant Public Sewer Easements over Common Lot C and the entry way
median island where necessary to maintain the required 20-foot width.
9. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire
Services to discuss fire requirements for this Site Plan Prior to submittal of
construction drawings for this site.
10. All landscaping shall be situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility
obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access drives and abutting
street intersections.
11. Prior to the release of a Final Map for recordation on this site, the property owner
must contact the Special Improvement District Section of the Department of Public
Works (702-229-2136) and sign a notarized affidavit acknowledging and agreeing
to a per lot assessment of all lots that will be created through a Final Map for this
site. The City shall prepare an apportionment report following recordation of the
Final Map and this apportionment report must be signed by the property owner
prior to the release of any building permits for this site.
of this site.
13. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for
Summerlin Village 24B and all other applicable site-related actions.
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
plans by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed
unless specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to
the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision related construction
plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not
constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a
revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing a 173-lot single-family residential subdivision on 24.08 acres

within Stonebridge Unit 3, Parcel E of Summerlin Village 24 located on the north side
of Crossbridge Drive, approximately 1,407 feet west of Sky Vista Drive.
ISSUES
This is a 173-lot single-family residential development to be built to SF3 (Single

Family Detached) standards in accordance with the Summerlin Development
Standards. Staff recommends approval of this tentative map request.
The Wastewater Collection System Master Plan for Village 24, Parcel E has a
maximum 125 unit capacity for this property. The proposed single-family residential
subdivision is for 173 lots and exceeds the limit of the current Wastewater Collection
System Master Plan. The Department of Public Works has imposed a condition of
approval, to require revision to said master plan prior to submittal of any civil
improvement drawings associated with this map.
ANALYSIS
The proposed Tentative Map is for a 173-lot single-family residential subdivision located
on Village 24, Parcel E in Summerlin West. The proposed development is subject to
the terms of a Development Agreement between the Master Developer and the City of
Las Vegas and also to the requirements of the Summerlin Development Standards.
The proposed tentative map and the specific residential product to be constructed on
the site were reviewed and conditionally approved by the Summerlin Design Review
Committee on 04/25/17, prior to submittal to the City for review.
The subject property is designated as SF3 (Single Family Detached) Summerlin Special
Land Use Designation which allows for a maximum of 10 units per gross acre. The
proposed development has a density of 7.18 units per acre which falls well within the
maximum allowed. As this site is part of a master plan with its own improvement
standards, it is not subject to Title 19 requirements. Although it is not subject to Title 19
connectivity requirements, the design of the subdivision has a Connectivity Score of
1.11, which is below the preferred ratio of 1.30.
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
The proposed lots range in size from 3,325 square feet to 14,292 square feet. Site
access is from Crossbridge Drive by way of a 78-foot public.
Additional emergency access to Crossbrige Drive is provided through a proposed public

utility easement in the western portion of the site. Interior circulation is provided by 43-
foot wide public streets with a roll curb and gutter and sidewalk on one side of the
street.
school students would be generated by the proposed development on this site. Of the
three schools in the area (Givens Elementary School, Rogich Middle School and Palo
Verde High School), the District notes that all three schools are over capacity for the
2016-17 school year and no new schools are planned in this area at this time.
The Summerlin Development Standards allow perimeter village walls to be built up to 10

feet high (as measured from the side of the wall with the maximum vertical exposure)
without a major deviation. The submitted east/west cross section depicts a maximum
natural grade greater than 2% across this site. Per the detail sheet, no single wall
heights are higher than 10-feet. However, two lots have a three-tiered wall system to
compensate for the grade. The submitted north/south cross section depicts a maximum
natural grade less than 2% across this site. Per the detail sheets, no wall heights are
shown greater than 10-feet.
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to the Summerlin Development Standards, the
Village 24 Master Development Plan and Title 19 requirements for Tentative Maps.
Staff therefore recommends approval.

The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DA-0001-96)
for the development of the Summerlin Planned Community west of the
215 Beltway between Charleston Boulevard and Cheyenne Avenue.
01/27/97
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
agreement was adopted as Ordinance 4069 on 02/24/97 and was
recorded 11/21/97.
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0119-96) from N-U (Non-
Urban) to P-C (Planned Community) on 8,318 acres west of the 215
02/28/97
Beltway between Charleston Boulevard and Cheyenne Avenue. The
The City Council approved a Master Development Plan Review (MDR-
3867) for a proposed village plan for Summerlin Village 24 on 502.20
05/05/04
acres at the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Sky Vista
Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
a proposed 20-pod multiple use subdivision on 502.20 acres at the
05/13/04
northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Sky Vista Drive. Staff
recommended approval. The approval expired 05/10/08.
a proposed 105-lot single family residential subdivision on 35.80 acres
01/13/05
corresponding with Parcel B of TMP-4175. Staff recommended
approval. The approval expired 01/13/07.
A Final Map (FMP-4905) for a two-lot parent subdivision (Summerlin
Village 24 Unit No. 1) on 87.07 acres adjacent to the west side of Sky
05/10/06 Vista Drive between Charleston Boulevard and Alta Drive, was
recorded. This extended the approval of TMP-4175 one year until
05/10/07.
a proposed 246-lot single family residential subdivision (Summerlin
07/13/06 Village 24 Parcel A Silver Creek) on 40.10 acres at the northwest
corner of Charleston Boulevard and Sky Vista Drive. Staff
A Final Map (FMP-14224) for a 237-lot single family residential
subdivision (Summerlin Village 24 Parcel A Silver Creek) on 42.99
02/08/07
Drive was recorded.
Department of Planning staff approved the applicant's request for a
04/11/07 one-year extension of time on the approval for TMP-4175, until
05/10/08.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-42246) all public
street rights-of-way within Parcel A. The Planning Commission and
09/07/11
staff recommended approval. An Order of Vacation was not recorded
and the approval expired 09/07/12.
A Final Map (FMP-42158) for reversion to acreage of a 237-lot single
family residential subdivision (Summerlin Village 24 Parcel A Silver
10/31/11 Creek) was accepted for final mylar review. However, this
reversionary map was not recorded and was withdrawn 02/05/13 by
the applicant.
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]

Department of Planning staff approved a request for a Minor
Modification (MOD-54315) of the approved Summerlin Village 24
06/19/14 Master Development Plan (MDR-3867) for a proposed 20-pod Planned
Community Development on 501.10 acres at the northwest corner of
Charleston Boulevard and Sky Vista Drive.
a 19-parcel master planned village on 455.90 acres at the southwest
07/08/14
corner of Alta Drive and Sky Vista Drive. Staff recommended
approval.
Master Development Plan (MDR-3867) for a proposed 16-pod Planned
01/07/15
Community Development with seven common open space parcels on
502.10 acres at the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Sky
Vista Drive.
a 22-parcel Master Plan Village on the parcels located at the
02/10/15
southwest corner of Alta Drive and Sky Vista Drive. Staff
The Final Map (FMP-62680) technical review for seven parent
08/26/16 residential parcels and six common open space parcels were
recorded.


There are no building permits or business licenses related to the subject site.
04/18/17
requirements for a Tentative Map were discussed.
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check where the subject site was
05/04/17
observed. This is an undeveloped portion of the Stonebridge-Unit 3.

Site Area
Gross Acres 24.08

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject P-C (Planned
Undeveloped SUM (Summerlin)
Property Community)
P-C (Planned
North Undeveloped SUM (Summerlin)
Community)
P-C (Planned
Community)
South
P-C (Planned
Community)
P-C (Planned
Community)
East
P-C (Planned
Community)
P-C (Planned
West Undeveloped SUM (Summerlin)
Community)

Summerlin Y
P-C (Planned Community) District Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
Pursuant to the Summerlin Development Standards, the following standards apply:
SF3 (Single Family
Detached) Min. Setbacks:
Front Loaded 18 Feet 19 Feet Y
garage)
Side Load (garage) 10 Feet 14 Feet Y
Side 5 Feet 6 Feet Y
Corner 15 Feet 15 Feet Y
Rear 15 Feet 15 Feet Y
Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification
Document Width Street
of Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Crossbridge Drive N/A N/A 120 N/A
Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed

P-C [SF3] 10 du/ac 241
Internal Street 6
Intersection Internal 4
Cul-de-sac Terminus 3 3
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 2
Total 10 9
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links /
N/A 1.11
Nodes):
RG
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033]
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Required Provided Compliance
Floor Area Parking Parking
Use Parking
or Number Handi- Regula Handi-
Ratio Regular
of Units capped r capped
Single
2 spaces
Family, 173 du 346
per du
Detached
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 346 346 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Y
346 0 346 0
Required
RG
TMP-70239

TMP-70239

TMP-70239 - REVISED

7 b77A7A7AA
b A A AA
7
7

TMP-70239 - REVISED

7 b77A7A7AA
b A A AA
7
7

TMP-70239

7 b77A7A7AA
7
7

TMP-70239

7 b77A7A7AA
7
7

TMP-70239

7 b77A7A7AA
7
7

TMP-70239

7 b77A7A7AA
7
7

TMP-70239

7 b77A7A7AA
7
7
TMP-70239

TMP-70239
TMP-70239 [PRJ-70033] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES - OWNER: HOWARD
HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
NORTH SIDE OF CROSSBRIDGE DRIVE, WEST OF SKY VISTA DRIVE
05/04/2017
HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
05/04/2017
HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
05/04/2017
A7
A77
b777
77
777
7777
77 777777777777
7A777&77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7
7777777777777
777777b7777 A777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777 77
777777777777
77777777777777
77777777777777b
9777777777777777
7777
7777
7777A

77A777777777777777

777
TMP-70239
777b 7 7 77AA
7 7
7A
77b7 )
7
777
A77
7
77b7
7A7
777777
777
77 b777b7A7777A77
77
7777b7b77777777
7777777
7 b7777777777
b
7777777
76
7A7b
777

7A7
A

TMP-70239
TMP-70239
Agenda Item No.: 9.

SUBJECT:
TMP-70262 - TENTATIVE MAP - SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 24 PARCEL C - APPLICANT:
GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 155-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 23.62 acres at the southeast corner of Crossbridge Drive and
Suncreek Drive, west of Sky Vista Drive (APN 137-34-321-001), P-C (Planned Community)
Zone [SF3 (Single Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers)


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC - OWNER:
HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED N/A
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

Regulations.

CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]
Conditions Page Two

Public Works
Easements with private maintenance by the Homeowners Association.
8. A revision to the Summerlin Village 24 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

reflecting the proposed increase in residential units shall be submitted and
approved prior to the submittal of any civil improvements drawings.
9. Grant a minimum 20-foot wide Public Sewer Easement on Common Element N.

Pavement across this easement will be required concurrent with development of
this site. No structures, and no trees or vegetation taller than three feet, shall be
allowed within Public Sewer Easements.
of this site.
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a 155-lot single-family residential subdivision on 23.62 acres within
Summerlin Village 24.
ISSUES

ANALYSIS
The subject property is part of Summerlin West, which is governed by a Development

Agreement between the Master Developer and the City of Las Vegas, as well as the
Summerlin Development Standards. The proposed Tentative Map was reviewed and
approved by the Summerlin Design Review Committee on 04/25/17, prior to submittal to
the City for review.
The Summerlin Development Standards designate the subject property as SF3 (Single
Family, Detached), which allows up to 10 residential units per gross acre. The
proposed density of 6.56 dwelling units per net acre falls well within the maximum
allowed. As this site is part of a master plan with its own improvement standards, it is
not subject to Title 19.04 street section requirements. Although it is not subject to
1.29, which is slightly below the preferred ratio of 1.30.
access is proposed from Crossbridge Drive, a public right-of-way. Interior circulation is
provided by 37-foot wide private streets with four-foot sidewalks on one side of the
street. Curb and gutter are provided on both sides of the street. No required trails are
adjacent to the site. No neighborhood parks are proposed. The Public Works
Department commented that, A new master sewer study update will be required by
condition since the TMP is requesting more units than the master sewer study originally
allowed. No building permits can be issued until the new master sewer study is
completed.
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]

without a major deviation. The submitted east/west and north/south cross sections
depict a maximum natural grade greater than 2% across this site. Per the detail sheet,
no single wall heights have an exposure higher than 10 feet.
There is a primary and secondary charter school on the property adjacent to the north of
the subject site. The Clark County School District projects that approximately 67
additional primary and secondary school students will be generated by the proposed
development on this site. All three levels of schools serving the area (Givens
Elementary School, Rogich Middle School and Palo Verde High School) are near or
over capacity for the 2016-2017 school year. In particular, Palo Verde High School and
Rogich Middle School are at approximately 107 percent capacity while Givens
Elementary School is at approximately 133 percent capacity.
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes, Title 19 and the
Summerlin Development Standards, and has been approved by the Summerlin Design
Review Committee. Therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions.

01/27/97
recorded 11/21/97.
02/28/97
05/05/04
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]

05/13/04
01/13/05
05/10/07.
02/08/07
Drive was recorded.
05/10/08.
09/07/11
the applicant.
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]

07/08/14
approval.
01/07/15
Vista Drive.
02/10/15
08/26/16
residential parcels and six common open space parcel was recorded.


There are no related building permits or business licenses on file.
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
04/18/17
submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed.
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an undeveloped site
05/04/17
consisting of desert vegetation.
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]

Site Area
Gross Acres 23.62

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject SF-3 (Single Family P-C (Planned
Undeveloped
Property Detached) Community)
Public or Private
MF-2 (Medium P-C (Planned
North School, Primary
Density Multi-Family) Community)
and Secondary
SF-3 (Single Family P-C (Planned
South Undeveloped
Detached) Community)
Single Family, SF-3 (Single Family P-C (Planned
East
Detached Detached) Community)
SF-3 (Single Family P-C (Planned
West Undeveloped
Detached) Community)

Summerlin Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
Actual
Functional Compliance
Governing Street
Street Name Classification with Street
Document Width
of Street(s) Section
(Feet)
Crossbridge Drive N/A N/A 120 N/A
CS
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138]

P-C [SF3] 10 du/ac 241
Internal Street 17
Intersection Internal 12
Cul-de-sac Terminus 2
Easements
Total 18 14
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links /
N/A 1.29
Nodes):
CS
TMP-70262
REVISED
b777A7
A77
A77 77
A77 b7b77A7b7
77 7A77Ab7b
A777
77 A777
77A77
b
777
7777
777
7A7
A77 77
A777 77b
A777 7
A7A7 777C77
A7b7
A77
A77
A77
A77
A77
777 b7
777 A7
7A7 77777
7b7 7
77
77
77
77
77
77A 7 TMP-70262 777

b777A7
77777777
7777
77777
77777C7
77777b7
7777
777
777
777
77777
777777
77777
7777
77777
77777
C77
7A
7777b7
777
7 A7 A
7A7bA777 77bA7777 A7A77
b
bA7A7 b7 7
b77A77 b77 7b7
77A 7 TMP-70262 777

TMP-70262 - REVISED

TMP-70262 - REVISED

TMP-70262 - REVISED

TMP-70262 - REVISED

TMP-70262 - REVISED

TMP-70262 - REVISED

TMP-70262 - REVISED

TMP-70262

TMP-70262

TMP-70262

TMP-70262

TMP-70262
TMP-70262 [PRJ-70138] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT: GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: HOWARD
HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CROSSBRIDGE DRIVE AND SUNCREEK DRIVE, WEST OF SKY VISTA DRIVE
05/04/2017
HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
05/04/2017
HUGHES COMPANY, LLC
05/04/2017
7 7
77
b77777
777
777
777 77777
7 7b7777
7777777b777777
777777777777b7A7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7 7
777777777
77777777777777777
777b77b77777779779
77777777777777
77777777:7777777:77777
7777:7777777
77777777777777
7777777777777777
7777777b7777:777A7
7777777777:777777
77777777777777:
777777
77777777777777
77
b 7
b77
7777777777777777777777777

bAA
TMP-70262
777b 7 7 77AA
7 7
7A
77b7 )
7
777
A77
7
b77
777%77
77
77 b777777b7A77b777
7
7777b7b777777777
777777777
7
7 77%777777%7777
777777%7b77777%7
77b7777777
7 7777%777b777777777
7%7777777777b77
7 7777%777%777777777
777%7777777777b77
7
7 7777b7777
7 777777%77777777777
777b77777777777777
7777777777b7777777
77
7 777777777%77777b77
777
7 777777b777777777
7 777777777777777777b7
777b7777A7777777
b77777777b77777777
777777777777777
77777777b77
7 77777777777777
7777777

7%
7A7b
777

TMP-70262
TMP-70262
Agenda Item No.: 10.

SUBJECT:
TMP-70334 - TENTATIVE MAP - SHADOW POINT AT SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 24
PARCEL B - APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES
COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 102-LOT
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 27.43 acres on the south side of
Crossbridge Drive, approximately 1,420 feet west of Sky Vista Drive (APN 164-03-114-001), P-
C (Planned Community) Zone [SF3 (Single Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70053]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. - OWNER: HOWARD
HUGHES CORPORATION
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED N/A
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

Regulations.

CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]
Conditions Page Two

Public Works
Easements with private maintenance by the Homeowners Association.
8. Construct a minimum pavement width of 12 feet for maintenance vehicle access

over the Public Sewer Easements on Common Elements D and E, between Lots
10 and 11 and 35 and 36, respectively, concurrent with the development of this
site. No structures, and no trees or vegetation taller than three feet, shall be
allowed within Public Sewer Easements.
of this site.
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a 102-lot single-family residential subdivision on 27.43 acres in

Summerlin Village 24.
ISSUES

ANALYSIS
The subject property is part of Summerlin West, which is governed by a Development

Agreement between the Master Developer and the City of Las Vegas, as well as the
Summerlin Development Standards. The proposed Tentative Map was reviewed and
approved by the Summerlin Design Review Committee on 05/12/17.
The Summerlin Development Standards designate the subject property as SF3 (Single
Family, Detached), which allows up to 10 residential units per gross acre. The
proposed density of 3.72 dwelling units per net acre falls well within the maximum
allowed. As this site is part of a master plan with its own improvement standards, it is
not subject to Title 19.04 street section requirements. Although it is not subject to
1.33, which meets the preferred ratio of 1.30.
access is proposed from Crossbridge Drive, a public right-of-way. Interior circulation is
provided by 43-foot wide private streets with four-foot sidewalks on one side of the
street. Curb and gutter are provided on both sides of the street. No required trails are
adjacent to the site. No neighborhood parks are proposed.

without a major deviation. The submitted east/west and north/south cross sections
depict a maximum natural grade greater than 2% across this site. Per the detail sheet,
no single wall heights have an exposure higher than 10 feet.
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]
The Clark County School District projects that approximately 44 additional primary and
secondary school students will be generated by the proposed development on this site.
All three levels of schools serving the area (Givens Elementary School, Rogich Middle
School and Palo Verde High School) are near or over capacity for the 2016-2017 school
year. In particular, Palo Verde High School and Rogich Middle School are at
approximately 107 percent capacity, while Givens Elementary School is at
approximately 133 percent capacity.
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes, Title 19 and the
Summerlin Development Standards, and has been approved by the Summerlin Design
Review Committee. Therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions.

01/27/97
recorded 11/21/97.
02/28/97
05/05/04
05/13/04
01/13/05
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]

05/10/07.
02/08/07
Drive was recorded.
05/10/08.
09/07/11
the applicant.
07/08/14
approval.
01/07/15
Vista Drive.
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]

02/10/15
08/26/16
residential parcels and six common open space parcel was recorded.


There are no related building permits or business licenses on file.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss
04/18/17 submittal requirements for a Tentative Map application and the
technical aspects of the tentative map.
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
05/04/17 Staff conducted a routine field check and found an undeveloped site.

Site Area
Net Acres 27.43

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject SF3 (Single Family P-C (Planned
Undeveloped
Property Detached) Community)
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]

Property District
19.12 Designation
SF3 (Single Family
P-C (Planned
North Undeveloped Detached)/NF
Community)
(Neighborhood Focus)
COS (Community P-C (Planned
South Drainage Corridor
Open Space) Community)
East Drainage Corridor
West Drainage Corridor
Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance

Summerlin Y
Trails N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Assessment)

Governing
Document
Crossbridge
N/A N/A 120 Y
Drive
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]
Internal Street 11 9
Intersection Internal
Cul-de-sac Terminus 1
Easements
Total 13 10
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes): N/A 1.30
CS
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053]
CS
TMP-70334
REVISED
TMP-70334
REVISED

TMP-70334 - REVISED

7

A77A7
7
7A77
A7 77777777777

A77 777!A
TMP-70334 - REVISED

A77A7
7A77
77777777777
777!A
7
A7A7
A77A7
A77Ab7
77
7 A7

7Ab
b77A7A7AA
A77A

77"A
777777777
A 7 7 7

7

77 77777777 A7
777$A7
b7A
A7b

b7
A7A
bA
A77Ab7
A 77A7
A77A
bA7
7A
TMP-70334 - REVISED

TMP-70334 - REVISED

Ab77
A7A
7
A 77A7
A77Ab7 777777777

777 77"A

Ab77
TMP-70334 - REVISED

A7A
7
A 77A7
A77Ab7 777777777

777 77"A
7 A 77 7 7 b 7 7 A 7777777777
7 7 7b 7
77"A
777777777
7 7 7b 777 7 7 7b 777 7 7 7b 777 7A 7b 7
7 7A 7b 777 7A 7A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7A 7 7 A 7A 7A 7 7 A
A7A
A77Ab7
A7777
7 7A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 7A 7A 7 7 A 7 7 b
A 77A7
A 7 A 7 A

A b7 7 7
7 7A 7 7 A 7 A 7
TMP-70334 - REVISED

A 7A 7A 7 77 A
7 A 7A 7A 7 7bA 7 7 A 7A 7A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7A 7A 7 7 7 A
7bA
77"A
777777777
A 7A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 A 7A 7A 7 7 A 7 A 7A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 A 7A 7A 7 7bA
7 7 7
A 7 7b7 7A 7 7 A 7
7 7 A 7A 7b 7 7 7bA A 7A 7b 7
77 A
A7A
A77Ab7
A7777
A 77A7
TMP-70334 - REVISED
TMP-70334 - REVISED

A7A
7
A 77A7
A77Ab7 777777777

b7b7777 77"A

TMP-70334 - REVISED
Ab77

A7A
7
A 77A7
A77Ab7 777777777

b7b7777 77"A

Ab77
TMP-70334 - REVISED

A7A
7
A 77A7
A77Ab7 777777777

b7b7777 77"A

TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES
COMPANY, LLC
SOUTH SIDE OF CROSSBRIDGE DRIVE, WEST OF SKY VISTA DRIVE
05/04/2017
TMP-70334 [PRJ-70053] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES
COMPANY, LLC
SOUTH SIDE OF CROSSBRIDGE DRIVE, WEST OF SKY VISTA DRIVE
05/04/2017

TMP-70334

TMP-70334
777b 7 7 77AA
7 7
7A
77b7 )
7
777
77
7
77
77
777b77
7777
77 b7777777A777777
7777
7777b7b7777777
777777
7777777
77777777
7 7b777777777777b77
77777A7777777777b
777777777777777
7777777777777777
77
7
77777777
7777777
7=
7A7b
777

7

TMP-70334 - REVISED
TMP-70334

SUBJECT:
ZON-70234 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS
VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: P-O (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE) on 0.58 acres at the northeast corner of
Adams Avenue and C Street (Reversionary area as shown in Book 153 of Plats, Page 70,
formerly APNs 139-27-211-047, 049 and 062), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-70132]. Staff
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL
2. Staff Report
4. Photo(s)
ZON-70234 [PRJ-70132]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-70234 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 142
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
SS/NE
ZON-70234 [PRJ-70132]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to rezone a parcel of land at the northeast corner of Adams
Avenue and C Street from a residential district to a commercial district. No structures
are planned to be constructed on this property at this time.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is a 0.58 acre lot located within the boundaries of both the
Downtown Redevelopment Area and the West Las Vegas Plan. The subject site is
currently zoned R-3 (Medium Density Residential), with a General Plan Designation of
MXU (Mixed Use). The applicant has proposed to rezone the subject site to P-O
(Professional Office), which is supported by the MXU (Mixed Use) General Plan
Designation.
One of the goals and objectives of the Downtown Redevelopment Area is the
conservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area in accord
with the Master Plan, the Redevelopment Plan and local codes and ordinances.
Rezoning the subject site to a zoning district that is supported by the General Plan
Designation also supports the goals and objectives of the Downtown Redevelopment
Area plan.
Implementation Number four (4) of the West Las Vegas Plan states, identify
inconsistencies in land use and zoning within the Plan area and amend where
appropriate. Rezoning the subject site to P-O (Professional Office) corrects an
inconsistency within the plan area, while providing a buffer to the residentially zoned
properties to the north.
The subject site is adjacent to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoned properties to the
north containing multi-family residential uses, Interstate 15 to the east, and the Historic
Westside School to the west and south, which is zoned C-V (Civic). The proposed
rezoning would allow infill of light intensity commercial uses that are compatible with the
surrounding adjacent uses.
SS/NE
ZON-70234 [PRJ-70132]
Staff recommends approval. If denied, the property will remain zoned R-3 (Medium
Density Residential), which allows for multi-family dwellings of up to 50 dwelling units
per acre.
FINDINGS (ZON-70234)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning

Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.
If approved, the proposed Rezoning to P-O (Professional Office) would conform to

the General Plan, which designates this parcel MXU (Mixed Use). The MXU
category allows for a mix of uses normally allowed within a range of residential
and commercial land use designations, including the O (Office) designation, which
corresponds most closely with the P-O zoning district.
2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.
The P-O (Professional Office) zoning district is a transitional zone that allows for
low intensity administrative and professional office uses in areas that are
predominately residential but because of other factors is no longer suitable for the
continuation of these uses. In this case, the subject parcel is currently vacant and
is located adjacent to Interstate 15 and several nonresidential uses.
3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
The location of the property adjacent to Interstate 15, and Individual Care Center
and a Social Service Provider is appropriate for light intensity office uses, and will
allow for the potential placement of an Off-Premise Sign on property south of this
location.
4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be

adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
The subject site can be accessed from C Street and Adams Avenue, both of
which are classified as Minor Streets by LVMC Title 13. Little traffic is expected in
this area, and the relatively small size of the parcel and low intensity of use will not
require high capacity roadways.
SS/NE
ZON-70234 [PRJ-70132]

A Final Map (FMP-69622) to revert three multi-family residential lots to
04/26/17 acreage on 0.58 acres at the northeast corner of Adams Avenue and
C Street was recorded.

A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 139-27-211-
10/04/00
062.
03/29/13
049.
08/05/15
047.

A building permit (#236269) was issued for demolition of a single-
05/20/13 family dwelling at 216 West Adams Avenue. A final inspection was
approved 05/31/13.
A building permit (#300105) was issued for a temporary electrical
09/22/15 meter pole at 218 West Adams Avenue. A final inspection has not
been approved.
Staff and the applicant discussed submittal requirements for a
Rezoning application via phone and e-mail conversations. Staff
04/20/17 required that prior to submittal of an application for Rezoning, a
Reversionary Final Map to combine three parcels on the subject site
must be recorded.
Field Check
The site is vacant and abuts the Interstate 15 freeway. Power lines
05/04/17
run alongside the west side of the property in the public right-of-way.
SS/NE
ZON-70234 [PRJ-70132]

Site Area
Net Acres 0.58

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject R-3 (Medium Density
Undeveloped MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Residential)
Multi-Family
Residential
R-3 (Medium Density
North Single Family, MXU (Mixed Use)
Residential)
Detached
Undeveloped
Social Service
South PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Provider
Interstate 15
East Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
(Freeway)
Individual Care
West PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Center

West Las Vegas Plan Y
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet) Y
Trails (Pioneer Trail) Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Assessment)
SS/NE
ZON-70234 [PRJ-70132]
Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:

Min. Lot Size N/A 25,115 SF N/A
Min. Setbacks
Front 20 Feet N/A N/A
Side 5 Feet N/A N/A
Corner 15 Feet N/A N/A
Rear 15 Feet N/A N/A
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % N/A N/A

R-3 (Medium Density
13-50 du/ac 7-28
Residential)
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
P-O (Professional Office) N/A N/A
General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
MXU (Mixed Use) Unlimited Unlimited

Governing
Document
C Street Minor Street Title 13.12 37 N/A
Adams Avenue Minor Street Title 13.12 37 N/A
SS/NE
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
ZON-70234
b 7 7 7 !!!!77 7
77 7!7b 777
77A !b 777
77 7 7 7
777777 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
7
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777 777
@77

77 7 7
77 77
A b 7 A A
b 7b 7
A A 7 A b A

77b 7

7

A 7 7 A
A b A 77 7
A 7 7
7A 7
7 !7b 777 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 7777 77
7 7 77 7 7
b 7 77 7A 7
7
7A 777
A 7 7 7777 7 7

7 7b 7777 7 b 7 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 7 7 77
b 77 7 7 7 7
7A 7
A b A 7b 77 7 b 7 7 7
A 77 7 7 7 7 77
b 77 7 7 7 7
7A
A 7 b 7 7A 7 b A b 77
A 77 7 7 !77 7
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 7
7 7 777A 7 7 7@
A
b 7
ZON-70234
77 77777 7 7 7 7 7 R 7
7 777 7
77 77
7
7 777 7 7
7
A 7b 7 A A
7 77777b 7 b 77b 7 77 777 7 7 7
A A 7 A b A 7 777 77
A 7 7
77 777 7
777

7
ZON-70234
C-2
W MONROE AVE
B ST
D ST
A ST
MADISON AVE
C ST
R-3
JEFFERSON AVE
E ST
R-4
C-1
W ADAMS AVE SUBJECT
C-V W ADAMS AVE
PROPERTY
W WASHINGTON AVE
MOR GAN AVE

RR
ST
UP
AIN
NM
C-M
R-1
Zoning FROM R-3 TO P-O

U - (GPA Designation) R-2 - Medium-Low P-O - Professional Office C-M - Commercial/Industrial
Undeveloped Density Residential
R-3 - Medium Density N-S - Neighborhood Service M - Industrial
R-A - Ranch Acres 1000' Buffer
Residential
O - Office C-V - Civic
R-E - Residential Estates R-4 - High Density City Limits
R-D - Single-Family Residential C-D - Designed Commercial P-C - Planned Community
Residential-Restricted R-5 - Apartment Not City
R-PD - Residential C-1 - Limited Commercial T-D - Traditional Development GIS maps are normally produc ed
R-MH - Mobile/Manufactured only to meet the needs of the City.
Planned Development Home Residence Subject Property Due to c ontinuous dev elopment ac tivity
C-2 - General Commercial PD - Planned Development this map is for reference only.
R-1 - Single Family Geographic Inform ation System
R-MHP - Residential Mobile/ C-PB - Planned Business
Residential T-C - Town Center
Planning & Dev elopment Dept.
Manufactured Home Park Park 702-229-6301
R-CL - Single-Family
Compact-Lot P-R - Professional Offices Date: Monday, May 01, 2017
and Parking
A

7
b

ZON-70234
ZON-70234 [PRJ-70132] - REZONING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ADAMS AVENUE AND C STREET
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
7
7 7

A 7 A A 77
7b b
b 7 7 7 77 77
7A 777
7 7
7 7
7b 777 7 707777 77
70
0 7
777b 7 7 7 7777
7 7A 7
7b
7 777 777b 777 777
77 7 7 77 7 7 7
7 76
b 7 777777 777

777777777
b 7A 7 7 7 7 7 77
A 7

A ::
A

77 7 7
7A 7
77 7 7
b 7 A
77 A : 7
A 7 A 7 7

7

7

ZON-70234
6
:7
7

7
7S 67


SUBJECT:
VAR-70218 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VETERANS
VILLAGE 2, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO
ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE 36 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES ARE
REQUIRED FOR A PARKING-IMPAIRED DEVELOPMENT on 4.08 acres at 50 North 21st
Street (APNs 139-35-804-001 and 005), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)


RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
6. Support Postcards for VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: VETERANS VILLAGE 2, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-70218 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-70217 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: VAR-70218
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 445
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 7
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
VAR-70218 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development

Plan Review (SDR-70217) shall be required, if approved.
2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.
4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.
5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.
SDR-70217 CONDITIONS
Planning
2. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and building elevations,
date stamped 04/26/17, except as amended by conditions herein.
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
Conditions Page Two
5. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to
determine the most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the
existing lots. The mapping action shall be completed and recorded prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
6. The minimum distance between buildings shall be six feet.
7. The Community Center, Private (Accessory) use shall be for use only by residents
of the subject property.
9. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
Public Works
10. Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks
adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, if
any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this
site.
11. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this
site prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits,or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainage ways as recommended.
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a proposed Private Community Center within an existing apartment
complex. The subject site is located at 50 North 21st Street.
ISSUES
A Major Site Development Plan Review is required for new commercial development
that does not meet all minimum requirements of Title 19.
Approval of a Variance is needed as the applicant proposes to provide zero
additional parking spaces where 36 additional spaces are required for the proposed
Community Center, Private (Accessory) land use. Staff supports the request.
ANALYSIS
The subject site is home to a 204-unit apartment complex. Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-66879) was approved to allow the construction of a modular building in
November of 2016. The building was to be used for administrative office space and for
food storage. It was permitted only to serve the onsite residents and was prohibited
from providing any activity that falls under the Social Service Provider use as defined in
Title 19.12. The applicant now proposes to replace this modular building with a
permanent structure. The applicant proposes to construct a Private Community Center
(Accessory) building that will only be utilized by on-site residents.
The Community Center, Private (Accessory) use is defined as A facility associated with
a planned residential development or multi-family development which provides for
community activities for residents of the development. It is a permitted accessory use
in the R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning district. However, since the applicant
proposes to add no additional parking, a Variance and Major Site Development Plan
Review are required. Per the applicants justification letter, the proposed accessory
structure will have an office, multi-purpose rooms, and food storage. The submitted site
plan depicts a courtyard in front of the structure with plans for a future memorial wall
monument.
This project was routed to various City Departments for comment. The Las Vegas
Valley Water District submitted the following comment, The subject site is currently
served but does not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. The
service is located on 21st Street. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
LVVWD to verify domestic meter sizing, fire flow availability and backflow retrofit. The
City of Las Vegas Public Works Department commented that, There are underlying lot
lines on this site. We recommend that Planning impose the condition that the applicant
shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine the most
appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits. A
condition of approval has been added to address this issue. The Public Works
Department also commented that they support City Code parking requirements and are
opposed to the requested parking Variance.
The applicant requests a Variance in order to provide zero additional parking spaces for
the proposed Private Community Center accessory use. The existing apartment
complex is a parking impaired development. Per the submitted site plan, the subject site
will provide a total of 193 parking spaces of which three are handicapped accessible.
During a routine field check, staff found an unpermitted shipping container in the entry
parking lot. This issue has been forwarded to Code Enforcement. As the proposed use
will only be utilized by residents of the subject site, staff finds that it is reasonable to not
require any additional parking for an accessory use; therefore, staff recommends
approval, subject to conditions.
FINDINGS (VAR-70218)
In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:
1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;

2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.
Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:

Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
Staff finds that the applicant has provided sufficient evidence in order to grant the
Variance to allow zero additional parking spaces for the proposed development. The
proposed Private Community Center will only be utilized by residents. A condition of
approval has been added to ensure conformance to this requirement. It is concluded
that the applicants hardship is not preferential in nature and it is thereby within the
realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
FINDINGS (SDR-70217)
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and

development in the area;
The proposed Private Community Center will service the onsite residents and will
be compatible with the adjacent development in the area.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;
The proposed Private Community Center does not meet Title 19 parking
requirements, hence the request for a Variance. All other development standards
will be met.
3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or

neighborhood traffic;
Site access is provided by 21st Street, a 60-foot public right-of-way. The proposed
Private Community Center will not create any additional traffic, as the center will
only be utilized by residents of the subject site.
4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;
The building faade materials will be compatible with the faade of the principal
buildings onsite. There are no proposed changes to landscaping.
5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and

aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
The proposed Private Community Center is not unsightly or obnoxious in

appearance and will be harmonious and compatible with development in the area.
6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.
The subject site will be subject to regular inspections and therefore the public
health, safety and general welfare will be protected.

The City Commission approved a Rezoning (Z-0004-72) from R-3
02/16/72 (Medium Density Residential) and C-2 (General Commercial) to R-4
(High Density Residential).
The City Commission granted an extension of time for an approved
09/18/74
Rezoning (Z-0004-72) on the subject property.
The City Commission approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0004-72) for an
10/11/78
apartment complex on the subject property.
Planning Department Staff administratively approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-66879) for a proposed 1,056 square-
11/10/16
foot office modular addition to an existing multi-family apartment
complex at 50 North 21st Street.


Building Permit #331929 was issued for a modular building. The permit
12/14/16
was finalized on 01/04/17.
A pre-application meeting was held to discuss various submittal
04/13/17
requirements.
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an operating
05/04/17 apartment complex. There were no signs of trash or debris. There
was an unpermitted shipping container onsite.

Site Area
Net Acres 4.08

Surrounding
Use Per Title Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property
19.12 Designation
Subject Multi-Family R-4 (High Density
MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Residential Residential)
Multi-Family R-4 (High Density
North MXU (Mixed Use)
Residential Residential)
Hotel, Motel MXU (Mixed Use)
South Or Hotel C-2 (General Commercial)
C (Commercial)
Suites
East Undeveloped C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
General Retail
Store, Other MXU (Mixed Use) C-2 (General Commercial)
West Than Listed
Multi-Family R-4 (High Density
C (Commercial)

No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Trails N/A
Assessment)
CS
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217 [PRJ-69982]

Min. Setbacks
Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet 6 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 11 % Y
Max. Building Height 35 Feet 20 Feet Y
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Multi-Family
204 units 1.25:Unit 255
Residential
Community
Center,
3,551 SF 1:200 SF 18
Private
(Accessory)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 273 193 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 266 7 190 3 N*
*The subject site is a Parking Impaired Development. The applicant requests a Variance to
provide zero additional parking spaces to service the Community Center, Private (Accessory)
use.
CS
VAR-70218

b777A7
A77
A77 777b7A
A77 777
77 A7A77b7A
A777 7
77 A777b
77A77
b
777
7777
777
7A
A7
A777 777b
A777
A7A7 7777
A7b7 7
A77
A77
A77
A7
A77 ?
777 A77777
777
7A7 77777
7b7 7
77
77
77
7
77 ?

VAR-70218 and SDR-70217
77A 7 777
b777A7
77777777
7777
77777
77777?7
77777b7
7777
777
777
777
77777
777777
77777
7777
77777
77777
?77
7A
7777b7
777
7 A7 A
A7A7777b7 77Ab777 A7A77
bA7A7 b7 7
A7?7 A7?77 7b7 ?

VAR-70218 and SDR-70217
77A 7 777
7A7A

A7
7
7A

7AA7

7AA7
7A7A

7A7
7b7
7b7
7

A7A

77

7 7

7A

7bA7

A7
77A

777A
7AAA7A

A
b7A

77

AA AA

bA7
A7A
b7A
A7A777
A77777777777A7A7AA
7bA7A7A7b7
7777777777777777777bA77
A777777777777777777
7777777777Ab77
A77bb77
7
A7A
A777777777777777777777777777Ab
Abb7A7777777Ab
A7A77777777777777Ab

AA

AA

AA

7

bA
b
AA
AAA
Ab77
7A7 bA7777

A7A777
Abb
Abb
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217

VAR-70218 and SDR-70217

VAR-70218 and SDR-70217

A7
A7
b
bA7
A7A

A
A7

bA
b
AA
AAA
Ab77
7A7 bA7777

A7A777
Abb
Abb
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217

VAR-70218 [PRJ-69982] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-70217 - APPLICANT/OWNER: VETERANS VILLAGE 2,
LLC
50 NORTH 21ST STREET
05/04/2017
LLC
05/04/2017
LLC
05/04/2017
LLC
05/04/2017
LLC
05/04/2017
777b
77777
777
777
A77
7
7
7b
77
777
77A
77
77
77 777b
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217

7A7 7777
7 777
7b7 A777
77
77 777b
7A7 7777
7 7777
7b7 A777
7
7 77
7 77
7777
7777777777777777
7777777777777
7777/777777A
A7
777777777777777
777777777777
777777777
777777777777
777777777
77777777A777A7
7777777777
7777777b777777777
77
7
7
7777A7777<777
77777
b77bA
7777777 77777
77777777777
AA7b7Abb
777777777777777
7777/7777777A7

VAR-70218 and SDR-70217

7
07
7<777 777777
77777<77777777777<
A7777777777777
7
77
777777
777777777777
777777<777777
7777777
7 77777
7 777777777/7<
7 7777777777b7
777A77777777
7777b7 7
777777777
7777
77
77/A
A77
77
A7077
777b
7%bA7
7 77
VAR-70218 and SDR-70217


SUBJECT:
SDR-70217 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-70218 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VETERANS VILLAGE 2, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 3,551 SQUARE-FOOT
COMMUNITY CENTER, PRIVATE (ACCESSORY) on 4.08 acres at 50 North 21st Street
(APNs 139-35-804-001 and 005), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-


RECOMMENDATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-70217


SUBJECT:
SUP-70226 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - OWNER: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - For possible
action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED UTILITY INSTALLATION,
OTHER THAN LISTED USE at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Puli Road
(portion of APN 126-23-000-003), U (Undeveloped) Zone [PF (Public Facilities) General Plan
Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70136]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT -
OWNER: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-70226 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-70227 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-70226
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 1092
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
SUP-70226 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Utility
Installation, Other Than Listed use.

Plan Review (SDR-70227) shall be required.
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-70226) shall be required.
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
Conditions Page Two
3. Deferral of the required perimeter landscape buffer is approved, until such time as
the Centennial Parkway alignment is dedicated and improved. The required
landscape buffers are to be installed and planted with landscape materials
pursuant to the provisions of the LVMC Title 19.08.
4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and building elevations,
date stamped 04/27/17, except as amended by conditions herein.
Public Works
9. The applicant is responsible to construct half-street improvements adjacent to this

site in conjunction with the onsite development. This requirement may be deferred
provided that a letter, on Las Vegas Valley Water District letterhead, is submitted
that acknowledges this requirement and commits to construct the required off-site
improvements along the north half of Centennial Parkway at such time that the City
provides written request therefor. If permanent improvements are deferred, the
applicant shall construct an access road servicing this site to meet dust control
standards concurrent with the development of this site.
10. Assessors Parcel Number (APN) # 126-23-000-003 is owned by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) and the City has a BLM grant (N-77772) for roadway,
sewer, drainage, trail, and Sheep Mountain Parkway within this parcel. Prior to
approval of construction drawings for this site, obtain the necessary easements or
provide proof of legal rights to construct on BLM property not covered by the Citys
existing BLM grant.
11. Comply with the recommendations of the approved Technical Drainage Study on
file with the City of Las Vegas for this site.
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to build a five million gallon water tank on a vacant property
located at the northwest corner of the Centennial Parkway and Puli Road alignments.
ISSUES
A Utility Installation, Other Than Listed use is permitted in the U (Undeveloped)

zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
The applicant requests that the required landscaping buffer be deferred until
Centennial Parkway right-of-way is dedicated and developed. A condition of
approval has been added to address this issue. Staff supports this request.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is located in the U (Undeveloped) zoning district and has an
underlying General Plan designation of PF (Public Facilities). The proposed Utility
Installation will occupy a portion of the 466.72 acre site, along the southern boundary of
the property. The subject property is located within 500 feet the jurisdictional boundary
with Clark County and is subject to the Development Impact Notification Assessment
form submittal with the Special Use Permit application. There were no comments
received from other agencies.
The applicant is proposing a five million gallon water tank to serve the nearby Skye
Canyon Master Plan community. The tank will be surrounded by a 10-foot tall tubular
steel and block wall fence. The tank is set back 106 feet from the future right-of-way
dedication. The front yard wall is located at the 50-foot building setback. This is
assuming the 50-foot right-of-way dedication will establish the southern property line as
depicted on the submitted plans. The water tank has a 100-foot tall antenna to be used
to monitor the water by the water district and not to be used as a wireless
communications tower.
No off-site improvements exist on Centennial Parkway adjacent to this site at the

southern boundary. As such, no improvements are required at this time the applicant is
proposing to not provide the required perimeter landscape buffers. Normally, the
Department of Public Works would require a Covenant Running with Land Agreement,
but this will not be required for this project as it is on Bureau of Land Management
property. Therefore, the applicant has requested that the installation of the required
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
landscaping be deferred until the Centennial Parkway alignment is dedicated and

developed. A condition of approval is added to address the installation of the
landscaping, requiring conformance with Title 19 requirements.
A Utility Installation, Other Than Listed use is permitted in the U (Undeveloped) zoning
district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Additionally, the following analysis is
required:
The Utility Installation, Other Than Listed use is defined as A facility or area used as (or
for) a utility installation not specifically listed in this Title. This use does not include any
type of wind energy conversion system. The proposed use meets the definition, the
applicants justification the proposed development is for a five million gallon water tank.
There are no Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use.
The proposed Utility Installation, Other Than Listed use will be located approximately
mile from the planned intersection of Centennial Parkway and Puli Road. Currently
another tank is located approximately one and a half miles from the planned intersection
of Centennial Parkway and Puli Road. The proposed use is appropriate for the area
since there is a similar installation on the subject site. The subject propertys General
Plan land use designation of PF (Public Facilities) allows for the type of use to occur on
the site. The proposed development of the subject site is consistent with surrounding
development in the area; therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions.
FINDINGS (SUP-70226)
In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious

and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.
Given the subject propertys General Plan land use designation of PF (Public
Facilities); the proposed Utility Installation, Other Than Listed use appropriate and
compatible with existing and future land uses surrounding the site.
2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
A portion of the 466.72 acre property will be developed as Utility Installation, Other
Than Listed. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the
proposed use.

adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
The subject property can be access via the Centennial Parkway alignment with an
unpaved, dirt road leading to the subject site for the proposed Utility Installation.
4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.
The approval of the Special Use Permit on this subject property will be subject to
condition of approval, building permit review and inspections to assure it will not
compromise the public health, safety and welfare.
5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.
The proposed use meets all of the applicable conditions of Title 19.12.

The proposed development of the subject site is consistent with surrounding

development in the area. The applicant proposes a five million gallon water tank.
The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, Title 19 and Wall
standards. The applicant requests that the required landscape material and buffer
be deferred to when Centennial Parkway is dedicated and right-of-way
improvements are installed.
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]

Site access and circulation will not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic. The site will only be frequented by maintenance personnel
of the water district.
City;
The building materials are appropriate for the area and the site and landscape
materials required to be installed with the right of way improvements will be in
accordance with Title 19.

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are compatible with
development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable for the surrounding
uses.
Site development is subject to permits and inspection, thereby safeguarding the

public health, safety and general welfare.

The Board of County Commission approved a Special Use Permit (U-
0905-04) for a Public Facility (water tank and antenna) and a waiver of
07/07/04
development standards for full off-site improvements subject to paved
legal access. Clark County staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Petition for Annexation (ANX-67313) to
01/04/17 Annex 466.72 acres generally located northwest of Centennial
Parkway and west of Puli Road.
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]

The subject property is currently owned by the U.S. Government, through management
of the Bureau of Land Management.

A building permit (#05-39793) was issued by Clark County for a chain
09/26/05 link fence around the five million gallon water tank at 10832 West
Centennial Parkway
A building permit (#05-39795) was issued by Clark County for a small
11/03/05 wooden sign attached to the chain link fence at 10832 West
Centennial Parkway.
A pre-application meeting was conducted by staff with the applicant
04/20/17 and discussed the application submittal process for a Special Use
Permit and Site Development Plan Review.
Field Check
Staff conducted a field check where the subject site was observed.
05/04/17 This property currently has an existing water tank on the western part
and the rest is mostly undeveloped.

Site Area
Gross Acres 466.72
Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use Existing Zoning
Land Use
Property Per Title 19.12 District
Designation
Utility Installation,
Subject
Other Than PF (Public Facilities) U (Undeveloped)
Property
Listed/Undeveloped
RG
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 [PRJ-70136]
Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use Existing Zoning
Land Use
Property Per Title 19.12 District
Designation
North Undeveloped PF (Public Facilities) U (Undeveloped)
Utility Installation,
South Other Than PF (Public Facilities) U (Undeveloped)
Listed/Undeveloped
PCD (Planned
Single Family, PD (Planned
East Community
Detached Development)
Development)
PF (Public Facilities) R-U (Rural Open Land
West Undeveloped
Clark County District) Clark County

Trails N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Y
Assessment)
Pursuant to 19.06, the following standards apply:

Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 466.72 Acres Y
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 5,385 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks (Water Tank)
Front 50 Feet 106 Feet Y
RG
SUP-70226

SUP-70226

SUP-70226 and SDR-70227

A
AA

77A777A7A77
77 A77
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227

A
AA

77A777A7A77
77 A77
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227

A
AA

77A777A7A77
77 A77
SUP-70226 and SDR-70227

A
AA

77A777A7A77
77 A77

SUP-70226 and SDR-70227

SUP-70226 [PRJ-70136] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SDR-70227 - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT - OWNER: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND PULI ROAD
05/04/2017

SUP-70226 and SDR-70227 - REVISED


SUBJECT:
SDR-70227 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-70226 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - OWNER: UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review
FOR A PROPOSED UTILITY INSTALLATION, OTHER THAN LISTED on a portion of
466.72 acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Puli Road (APN 126-23-000-
003), U (Undeveloped) Zone [PF (Public Facilities) General Plan Designation], Ward 6 (Ross)


RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SDR-70227

SDR-70227


SUBJECT:
SUP-69858 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WAFFLE BAR,
LLC - OWNER: GREAT WASH PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,832 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE
ESTABLISHMENT USE AND 1,141 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR SEATING AREA WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A 141-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A CITY PARK
WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120 (APN 138-32-
615-001), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-69786]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest/Support Postcards
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: WAFFLE BAR, LLC - OWNER: GREAT WASH
PARK, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-69858 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 822
PROTESTS 7
APPROVALS 2
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a

Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use.
3. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 141-foot distance

separation from a City park.
application.
6. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.
7. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use within a

proposed restaurant at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120.
ISSUES
A distance separation Waiver is required to allow the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use

141 feet from a City park where 400 feet is the minimum required. Staff supports the
Waiver of distance separation.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to establish a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use within a

proposed restaurant. The subject site is located in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning
district. The proposed use will be in conjunction with the restaurant which has an
interior space of 1,832 square feet and a 1,141 square-foot outdoor seating area. The
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use will be ancillary to the existing restaurant. The proposed
restaurant previously was established in the same development in 420 South Rampart
Boulevard, Suite #150. The applicant requested a change of location with the Business
License Division on 04/14/17.
Per Title 19, the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is defined as An

establishment whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer,
wine and coolers only for consumption on the premises where the same is sold. The
proposed use meets this definition as the applicant intends to operate a restaurant with
the option to sell alcoholic beverages to be consumed on site. No additional parking is
necessary beyond what is required for the principal use on the site. The proposed
restaurant will be subject to the parking requirements of the approved Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-10770).
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
1. Except as otherwise provided, any beer/wine/cooler on-sale establishment

(hereinafter establishment) must be more than 400 feet from any church/house
of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or
City park.
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]
The proposed site does not meet this requirement as it is located 141 feet from a
City park. The applicant has requested a waiver, which staff supports.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Regulation 3 below, the distances referred to in

Regulation 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between
two property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment
which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the
other being the property line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed
establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to
intervening obstacles. For purposes of measurement, the term property line
refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and does not include the property
line of: a) Any leasehold parcel; or b) Any parcel which lacks access to a public
street or has no area for on-site parking and which has been created so as to
avoid the distance limitation described in Regulation 1.
These requirements were used to determine the distance of the City park from
the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment.
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80

acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Regulation 1 shall be
measured in a straight line: a) From the nearest property line of the existing use
to the nearest portion of the structure in which the establishment will be located,
without regard to intervening obstacles; or b) In the case of a proposed
establishment which will be located within a shopping center or other multiple
tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest
property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will
be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
This requirement does not apply as the subject site is only 28.4 acres in size.
4. The minimum distance requirements in Regulation 1 do not apply to: a) An

establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or b) A
proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor
space.
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]
This requirement does not apply as the subject site does not have a non-
restricted gaming license in conjunction with a hotel.
5. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.
A condition of approval has been placed on the Special Use to ensure this
requirement is met, and a business license will need to be obtained.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is located within 141 feet
of a City park to the northeast where a 400-foot minimum distance separation is
required by Title 19.12. There is no direct access from the City park to the subject
Mixed-Use development within the 141-foot distance separation. Therefore, the
proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use will have adequate separation
from the existing City park. It has been determined that the proposed
Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale Establishment use can be conducted in a manner that is
compatible with the surrounding land uses, therefore, staff is recommending approval,
as the use is appropriate for the surrounding area.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale Establishment use can be conducted in

a manner that is harmonious and compatible with neighboring commercial and
residential uses within the existing Mixed-Use Development.
proposed.
The subject site is located within an existing Mixed-Use Development that is

physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.

RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]
The subject site has adequate access from Rampart Boulevard, a 100-foot
Primary Arterial and Alta Drive, an 80-foot Major Collector, as classified by the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
Approval of this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health, safety
or welfare of the general public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and
is subject to licensing restrictions.
Other than the required distance separation, all code requirements of Title 19.12
are being met.

The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-5653) from U
(Undeveloped) [GC (General Commercial) General Plan Designation]
03/02/05 to C-2 (General Commercial) on 30.21 acres at the northeast corner of
Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-10773) to allow 3,955
parking spaces where 4,961 spaces are required for a proposed
Mixed-Use Development on 28.69 acres at the northeast corner of
Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval. Staff recommended denial.
04/19/06 The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
10770) for a 10-story Mixed Use Development consisting of 699,000
net square feet of commercial space and 340 residential units on
28.69 acres at the northeast corner of Rampart Boulevard and Alta
Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Staff
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Review of Condition (ROC-21668) to
modify Condition Number 9 of an approved Site Development Plan
Review (SDR 10770) to allow a four-foot landscape buffer along the
06/06/07 south property line where eight feet is required adjacent to Building #9
within an approved Mixed-Use development on 28.69 acres at the
northeast corner of Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive. Staff
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]

07/12/07 a one-lot mixed use subdivision on 28.62 acres at the northeast corner
of Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive. Staff recommended approval.
A Final Map (FMP-41668) for a one-lot commercial subdivision on
06/29/11 28.43 acres at the northeast corner of Rampart Boulevard and Alta
Drive was recorded.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
41030) for a proposed 2,946 square-foot Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
04/12/11 Establishment use with a waiver to allow a 141-foot distance
separation from a City park at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite
#120.
The Department of Planning administratively approved a Minor
Amendment of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-47628) of an
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR 10770) for minor
01/24/13
revisions to building facades and floor plans on buildings 5, 11, 15 and
16 of an existing mixed use development on 28.43 acres at 330, 340,
350 and 360 South Rampart Boulevard.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Major Amendment
(SDR-52089) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
10770) to reduce the southeast side yard setback from 115 feet to 65
01/14/14
feet and to reduce the number of residential units from 340 to 300 of
an existing Mixed-Use Development at 330, 340, 350, and 360 South
Rampart Boulevard. Staff recommended approval.
The Department of Planning administratively approved a request for a
Minor Amendment (SDR-54397) of an approved Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-10770) to remove building 13, incorporate building
07/08/14 14 into building 15, decrease total net floor area from 793,925 square
feet to 775,890 square feet and allow minor faade improvements at
an existing Mixed-Use Development at 280, 320, and 340 South
Rampart Boulevard.


A building permit (#07002966) was issued for a shell building at 410
02/23/09
South Rampart Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 03/21/12.
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]

A building permit (#183446) was issued for a tenant improvement for a
03/15/11 restaurant at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. The permit
A business license (L09-93260) was issued for a Beer/Wine/Cooler
On-Sale at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. The license
was marked out business on 12/01/14.
01/23/13
A business license (R09-01723) was issued for a restaurant at 410
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. The license was marked out of
business on 12/01/14.
A business license (R09-01607) was issued for a restaurant at 410
05/19/11 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. The licensed was marked out
of business on 09/12/14.
A business license (L09-00332) was issued for a Beer/Wine/Cooler
09/13/11 On-Sale at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. The license
was marked out of business on 12/17/12.
A business license (G64-02092) was issued for a restaurant at 420
04/27/16 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #150. The license was marked out of
A business license (G65-02740) for a restaurant was processed for a
04/14/17 change of location at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. The
license is in the final review by Business License.
A business license (P65-00105) for Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale was
processed at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. The license
05/02/17
review was denied by the Department of Planning pending approval of
SUP-69858.
A pre-application meeting was conducted by staff, the submittal
04/03/17 requirements for a Special Use Permit with a waiver of the distance
separation were discussed.
A neighborhood meeting not required, nor was one held
Field Check
Staff conducted a field check of the subject site observed an operating
05/04/17
restaurant that is well maintained.
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]

Site Area
Net Acres 28.43
Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Land Use Designation District
19.12
Subject Mixed-Use GC (General C-2 (General
Property Development Commercial) Commercial)
Commercial
PR-OS
Recreation and
North (Parks/Recreation/Open C-V (Civic)
Amusement
Space)
(Outdoor)
Undeveloped
[approved
SC (Service PD (Planned
South Shopping Center
Commercial) Development)
and Multi-Family
Development]
Single-Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
East
Detached Residential) Residential)
SC (Service C-1 (Limited
West Hotel/Casino
Commercial) Commercial)

Trails (Pedestrian Path) Y
Assessment)
RG
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786]

Governing
Street Name Classification of Street Width with Street
Document
Street(s) (Feet) Section
Rampart Master Plan of Streets
Primary Arterial 100 Y
Boulevard & Highways
Master Plan of Streets
Alta Drive Major Collector 80 Y
& Highways
Pursuant to SDR-54397, the following parking standards apply:

Parking Requirement
Gross Required Provided Compliance
Floor Parking Parking
Use Area or
Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Number Regular Regular
capped capped
of Units
Shared parking
model
Mixed- 775,890
as originally 3,760
Use SF
approved by
SDR- 10770
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 3,760 3,877 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Y
3,712 48 3,817 60
Required
Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
A 400-foot minimum
To allow a 141-foot
separation distance is
separation distance from Approval
required from any
a City park
City park.
RG
SUP-69858
REVISED
SUP-69858
REVISED

77777
AA7

77 7 7 7 7
b77 7777
7777777b
7777
77777
77
777

77A77
SUP-69858

SUP-69858
SUP-69858 [PRJ-69786] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: WAFFLE BAR, LLC - OWNER: GREAT WASH
PARK, LLC
410 SOUTH RAMPART BOULEVARD, SUITE #120
05/04/2017
PARK, LLC
05/04/2017
PARK, LLC
05/04/2017

SUP-69858

SUBJECT:
SUP-69983 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LING''S
MASSAGE - OWNER: WEINGARTEN NOSTAT, INC. - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,934 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE
ESTABLISHMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A PARCEL ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE, A 70-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP, AND A 358-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SCHOOL AND AN INDIVIDUAL CARE CENTER
WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 1291 South Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190 (APN 162-06-
112-011), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-69620]. Staff


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcards
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LING'S MASSAGE - OWNER: WEINGARTEN
NOSTAT, INC.
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-69983 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 569
PROTESTS 20
APPROVALS 0
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Massage
Establishment use.
3. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot distance

separation from a parcel zoned for residential use where 400 feet is required.

separation from a church/house of worship use where 400 feet is required.

separation from a school use and an individual care center where 400 feet is
required.
application.
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to operate a 2,934 square-foot Massage Establishment use

within an existing Shopping Center located at 1291 South Decatur Boulevard, Suite
#190.
ISSUES
A Special Use Permit is required for a Massage Establishment in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district. Staff recommends approval.
Waivers are required to allow a zero-foot distance separation between the proposed
Massage Establishment and a parcel zoned for residential use, a 70-foot distance
separation from a church/house of worship use; and a 358-foot distance separation
from a school and an individual care center where 400 feet is the minimum distance
required. Staff recommends approval.
ANALYSIS
This Special Use Permit request is to allow a Massage Establishment use. The subject
site is a large Shopping Center located at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard
and Decatur Boulevard specifically designed to provide area residents with goods and
services. The subject site is zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial) and is within the Airport
Overlay District. The Airport Overlay District will not be affected by the proposed
Massage Establishment use.
The C-1 (Limited Commercial) District is intended to provide most retail shopping and
personal services, and may be appropriate for mixed use developments. This district
should be located on the periphery of residential neighborhoods and should be confined
to the intersections of primary and secondary thoroughfares along major retail corridors.
The C-1 (Limited Commercial) District is consistent with the Service Commercial and
the Neighborhood Center categories of the General Plan.
The proposed use is located on a parcel that is part of a Shopping Center and is
adjacent to a parcel residentially zoned, is within 70 feet of a church/house of worship
and is within 358 feet from a school and an individual care center. Staff supports these
requests as there are no direct access between the residentially zoned property,
church/house of worship, school and individual care center; and the subject site. The
only access available for the subject site is from Decatur Boulevard at the southwest
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]
corner of the shopping center. The adjacent residents to the south will have to travel
west on Oakey Boulevard, then proceed north on Decatur Boulevard for short distance
being able to access to the subject site. The church/house of worship is located
southeast of the shopping center on Arville Street, then proceed and enter the Shopping
Center through the parking lot heading west towards Decatur Boulevard side of the
development. There is no direct access from the church/house of worship, as the
subject parcel is located on the west end of the Shopping Center. The school and
individual care center is located on Vista Street, which will travel through either
Charleston Boulevard to the north or Del Rey Avenue to the south, then Arville Street
into the Shopping Center.
A Massage Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning

district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Additionally, the following analysis is
required:
The Massage Establishment use is defined as A facility which is occupied and used for
the purpose of practicing massage therapy as defined in LVMC Chapter 6.52. This use
does not include the accessory massage, as defined in this Title. The proposed use
meets the definition, as the proposed Massage Establishment use will occupy 2,934
square feet of the commercial space within the Shopping Center. The establishment
will contain 11 massage rooms with a total of 13 massage tables.
1. The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title 6.
The proposed use will be required to comply with all applicable requirements of
LVMC Title 6 as a condition of their business license once issued. The proposed
use will be subject to regular inspections by the Department of Planning,
Licensing Division to ensure compliance.
2. The use must be located on a secondary thoroughfare or larger.
The subject site is located on Decatur and Charleston Boulevards; both are 100-
foot Primary Arterials as defined by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways,
meeting this requirement.
3. The use may not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship,
school, City park, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or
any parcel zoned for residential use.
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]
The applicant has requested a waiver to allow the proposed Massage

Establishment adjacent to a residentially zoned parcel, within 70 feet of a
chuch/house of worshop, and 385 feet of a school and individual care center.
Staff supports the waiver as the site is a well-established commercial shopping
center and the protected uses do not have direct access to/from the shopping
center.
4. The use may not be located within 1000 feet of any other massage
establishment.
There is no other massage establishment within 1,000 feet of this proposed

location.
5. The hours of operation shall be limited to the period between 6:00 a.m. and
10:00 p.m., unless further limited by the City Council on a case-by-case basis.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the hours of operation will be
between 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. as stated in the applicants justification letter.
The subject site is a well-established shopping center with no direct access available
between the residentially zoned property, church/house of worship, school and
individual care center; and the subject site. Staff finds the proposed use can operate in
a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the existing surrounding commercial
and residential uses and is recommending approval of this request with conditions.

The proposed use is compatible with the existing surrounding uses as it will be
located within an existing shopping center specifically designed to provide goods
and services for the surrounding area.
proposed.
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed
Massage Establishment use, as it is an existing shopping center specifically
designed to provide services for the surrounding area.

Access to the site is provided by Decatur and Charleston Boulevards; 100-foot

Primary Arterials as defined by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, and
more than adequate for the vehicular needs of the subject site.
The proposed Massage Establishment will be subject to regular inspections by the

Business Licensing Division of the Planning Department ensuring the publics
health, safety, and welfare.
The proposed Massage Establishment use was not able to meet Special Use
Permit Requirement #3 which states, The use may not be located within 400 feet
of any church/house of worship, school, City Park, individual care center licensed
for more than 12 children, or any parcel zoned for residential use. Adjacent to
the site along the southern edge of the Shopping Center is the residentially zoned
property creating a zero-foot distance separation, a 78-foot distance separation
from a church/house of worship, a 358-foot distance separation from a school and
an individual care center from the proposed use. The applicant has requested
Waivers, which staff supports since there is no direct access between the
protected uses and the subject site.

The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for the
reclassification of property (Z-0075-62) from: R-E (Residence Estates)
04/01/64 to: C-1 (Limited Commercial) generally located south of West
Charleston Boulevard and west of Arville Street. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review [Z-0075-62(17)] for a proposed 571,410 square-foot Shopping
10/05/00 Center on the south side of Charleston Boulevard, east of Decatur
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.


A building permit (#01014065) was issued for a new building at 1291
08/03/01
South Decatur Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 02/25/02.
A business license (G50-06046) was issued for general retail sales at
01/23/04
1291 South Decatur Boulevard.
A building permit (#05001189) was issued for a tenant improvement
03/01/05 remodel at 1291 South Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190. The permit
A building permit (#06005098) was issued for a tenant improvement
08/04/06 remodel at 1291 South Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190. The permit
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting and discussed the submittal
03/22/17 requirements for a Special Use Permit with waivers of the distance
separations.
Field Check
A field check was conducted by staff. Staff observed the subject suite
05/04/17
within a neat and well maintained the Shopping Center.
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]

Site Area
Net Acres 6.02

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-1 (Limited
Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
North Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Restaurant C (Commercial)
Commercial)
R-3 (Medium Density
South Residential)
Multi-Family M (Medium Density
R-PD12 (Residential
Planned Development
12 Units per Acre)
P-R (Professional
Office and Parking)
Office, Other than SC (Service C-1 (Limited
East
Listed Commercial) Commercial)
P-R (Professional
Office and Parking)
C-1 (Limited
West Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
RG
SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620]
Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Decatur Boulevard Primary Arterial 100 Y
Highways Map
Charleston Planned Streets and
Primary Arterial 100 Y
Boulevard Highways Map
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Shopping
598,563 SF 1/250 SF 2,395
Center
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 2,351 44 2,811 69 Y
Waivers
To allow a zero-foot
The use may not be located
distance separation
within 400 feet of a parcel Approval
from a parcel zoned
zoned for residential use.
for residential use.
To allow a 70-foot
The use may not be located
distance separation
within 400 feet of a Approval
from a church/house
church/house of worship.
of worship.
To allow a 358-foot
The use may not be located distance separation
within 400 feet of a school from a school and an Approval
and individual care center. individual care
center.
RG
SUP-69983

SUP-69983

SUP-69983

SUP-69983

SUP-69983

SUP-69983

SUP-69983

SUP-69983

SUP-69983
SUP-69983

SUP-69983 [PRJ-69620] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: LING'S MASSAGE - OWNER: WEINGARTEN
NOSTAT, INC.
1291 SOUTH DECATUR BOULEVARD, SUITE #190
05/04/2017
NOSTAT, INC.
05/04/2017
NOSTAT, INC.
05/04/2017
NOSTAT, INC.
05/04/2017

SUP-69983 - REVISED

SUP-69983 - REVISED

SUBJECT:
SUP-70128 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 1908
CEDARVIEW CIRCLE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) TO AN
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS I) [CASITA] USE at 1908 Cedarview Circle (APN 163-
02-719-040), R-PD5 (Residential Planned Development - 5 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 1


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcard
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: 1908 CEDARVIEW CIRCLE, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 330
PROTESTS 1
APPROVALS 0
CS
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for an

Accessory Structure (Class I) use.
application.
CS
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow a casita with full kitchen at 1908
Cedarview Circle.
ISSUES
Pursuant to Title 19.12, an Accessory Structure (Class I) is permissible in the R-PD5

(Residential Planned Development 5 Units per Acre) zoning district with approval
of a Special Use Permit.
ANALYSIS
The Accessory Structure (Class I) use is defined as An accessory structure which is

located on the same residential parcel as a principal dwelling and which, as an ancillary
use, provide living quarters, including full kitchen facilities, for the occupants of the
principal dwelling or their tenants, domestic employees or temporary guests. This
proposed use is appropriate for the subject property, as the applicants justification letter
states that it will be initially rented out to tenants and eventually used by family
members. The owners will continue to live in the principal dwelling onsite.
1. The size of the lot or parcel must exceed 6500 square feet.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the subject lot is approximately
14,374 square feet in size.
2. Unless the principal dwelling is owner-occupied, a Class I accessory structure

may not be offered or occupied as a rental unit.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the principal dwelling will continue
to be occupied by the owner.
The applicant proposes to convert an existing Accessory Structure (Class I) to an

Accessory Structure (Class II) [casita] use. Per Assessor Records, Building Permit
#1869 was issued for a detached garage on 09/17/84. The structure, currently used for
storage, is located in the northeast corner of the subject site. The existing exterior
CS
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004]
faade matches the principal dwelling and will not be changed. Per the submitted floor
plan, the casita will have one bedroom, a living room, dining room, kitchen and
bathroom. The site plan shows adequate available parking in front of the casita.
The proposed Accessory Structure (Class I) [casita] use meets all minimum Special Use
Permit requirements and will be compatible with the principal dwelling. Staff therefore
recommends approval, subject to conditions.

The proposed Accessory Structure (Class I) use will be located on a property with
a single-family residence and can be operated in a manner that is harmonious
and compatible with existing surrounding land uses and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.
proposed.
The proposed Accessory Structure (Class I) adheres to all minimum requirements

as stipulated by Title 19. The lot size of 14,374 square feet can physically
accommodate the proposed Accessory Structure (Class I) use.

Primary access to the site is provided from Cedarview Circle, an approximately

50-foot wide public right-of-way, which can provide adequate access to the
Accessory Structure (Class I) use.
This use will be subject to building inspections via the permitting process;
therefore, it will not compromise the public health, welfare or safety.
CS
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004]
The proposed Accessory Structure (Class I) use meets all of the applicable
conditions of Title 19.12.

There are no relevant city actions on file.


05/22/78 Building Permit #6623 was issued for a new single family dwelling.
09/17/84 Building Permit #1869 was issued for a detached garage.
04/18/17
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found a well maintained
05/04/17 single family dwelling. The subject accessory structure is situated in
the northeast corner of the parcel.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.33
CS
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004]

Property District
19.12 Designation
R-PD5 (Residential
Subject Single Family, L (Low Density
Planned Development -
Property Detached Residential)
5 Units/ Acre)
R-PD5 (Residential
Single Family, L (Low Density
North Planned Development -
Detached Residential)
5 Units/ Acre)
R-PD5 (Residential
South Planned Development -
5 Units/ Acre)
R-PD5 (Residential
East Planned Development -
5 Units/ Acre)
R-PD5 (Residential
West Planned Development -
5 Units/ Acre)

Trails N/A
Assessment)
CS
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004]
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Single
2 spaces
Family, 1 unit 2
per unit
Attached
Accessory 1
Structure 1 casita additional 1
(Class I) space
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 3 0 3 0 Y
CS
SUP-70128

b777A7
A77
A77 77
A77 7bA7b
77 7bAA
A777
77 A777AAA
77A77
b
777
7777
777
7A7 77
A7
A777
A777
A7A7 7b7b
A7b7 7
A77
A77
A77 7
A77 7
A77 B
777
777
7A7 7b7b
7b7 7
77
77
77 7
77 7
77 B
77A 7
SUP-70128 777
b777A7
77777777
7777
77777
77777B7
77777b7
7777
777
777
777
77777
777777
77777
7777
77777
77777
B77
7A
7777b7
777
7 A7 A
7bA7bb777b7 7bA7b7 A7A77
bA7A7 b7 7
77 77b7 7 B
77A 7
SUP-70128 777
SUP-70128

SUP-70128

SUP-70128

SUP-70128

SUP-70128

SUP-70128
SUP-70128

SUP-70128

SUP-70128

SUP-70128
SUP-70128

SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT/OWNER: 1908 CEDARVIEW CIRCLE, LLC
1908 CEDARVIEW CIRCLE
05/04/2017
SUP-70128 [PRJ-70004] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT/OWNER: 1908 CEDARVIEW CIRCLE, LLC
1908 CEDARVIEW CIRCLE
05/04/2017
7
7b 7b 7 7 7 7 77 7 77
b 77 7
7
7 77
7 7
7b777
77 7777 7 77 7 7 7777 7 77
7 777777 777 7777 7777
777777 777 7 7 77 77
777 7777777777 77 77 77
777777777 777 7777777777
77 77 7777 77777 777777 777
77 7777 7777777 7777 77777 77
777777 7 77777
SUP-70128

SUBJECT:
SUP-70228 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ZHI GANG
WANG - OWNER: MRA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
A PROPOSED 4,167 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL USE WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A 75-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A CHILD CARE
FACILITY WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 8991 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-08-120-
032), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70141]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ZHI GANG WANG - OWNER: MRA, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 1448
PROTESTS 2
APPROVALS 2
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

Restaurant with Alcohol use.

separation from a child care facility where 400 feet is required.
application.
license.
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a Special Use Permit request to allow a Restaurant with Alcohol use at 8991
West Sahara Avenue.
ISSUES
A Special Use Permit is required for a Restaurant with Alcohol use in the C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district.
A distance separation waiver is needed in order to allow the Restaurant with Alcohol
use within 400 feet of a Child Care Facility. Staff supports the request.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to establish a Restaurant with Alcohol use within an existing
shopping center. The subject site is located within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district. Per the submitted site plan, there are a total of 50 parking spaces available on
the subject parcel. There is also shared access and parking throughout the subject
shopping center site.
A Restaurant with Alcohol use is described in Tile 19.12 as: A restaurant and bar
operation with alcoholic beverage sales in which:
1. The actual seating available at all times within the dining area will
accommodate at least 100 persons. For purposes of this requirement, the
dining area does not include bar stool seating at the bar or lounge seating,
but may include table or booth seating within the bar area and table seating
within a patio area;
2. Alcoholic beverages are served in the restaurant area only in conjunction with
the service of food;
3. Full-course meals are available during all hours the bar area is open to the
public; A cook and food server, other than a bartender, are available at all
times the bar area is open to the public; and
4. The restaurant operation is the principal portion of the business.
The submitted plans indicate the proposed establishment will occupy an existing 4,167
square-foot building with approximately 122 seats for dining, meeting this definition.
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]
Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:
1. No restaurant with alcohol use shall be located within 400 feet of any
church/house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12
children, or City park.
The applicant is requesting a distance separation waiver in order to be located

approximately 75 feet from a child care facility.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred

to in Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance
between two property lines, one being the property line of the proposed
establishment which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement
pertains, and the other being the property line of that existing use which is
closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a
straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest
parcels and does not include the property line of:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-
site parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance
limitation described in Requirement 1.
Distances have been measured in accordance with this requirement.
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least

80 acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be
measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion
of the structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard
to intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest
property line of the existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold
or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located, without
regard to intervening obstacles.
This condition is not applicable; the subject site is not located on a parcel of at
least 80 acres of size.
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which

also requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of
its recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement
should be waived and the reasons in support of the decision.
The proposed use is located within 400 feet of a protected land use as measured
from property line to property line. However, the subject site is located within a
shopping center and the Restaurant with Alcohol use will actually be located over
1,000 feet from the protected land use. Therefore, staff recommends approval of
the request.
5. The minimum distance requirement in Requirement 1 does not apply to an

establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992, or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992.
This condition is not applicable.
6. The parcel or use is operated or controlled by an agency or subdivision of

local, state or federal government. (C-V only)
This condition is not applicable; the proposed use is not located in a C-V (Civic)
zoning district.
* 7. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions
of LVMC Chapter 6.50.
The proposed use, if approved, will be subject to all business licensing

requirements outlined in LVMC Chapter 6.50.
While there is a protected land use located within 400 feet of the subject property, the
proposed Restaurant with Alcohol use is situated within a shopping center over 1,000
feet from the nearest protected land use property. The proposed use can be conducted
in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding land uses; therefore, Staff
recommends approval, subject to conditions.
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]

The proposed Restaurant with Alcohol use can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with neighboring commercial and residential uses in
the area.
proposed.
The subject site is located within an existing shopping center development that is
physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.

Adequate access to the site is provided by Sahara Avenue, a 100-foot Primary

Arterial as classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
Approval of this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health safety
and general welfare of the public. The use will be subject to licensing restrictions,
and regular inspections.
The applicant meets all conditions of Title 19 except for the distance separation
requirement, for which a Waiver is being requested.

The City Council approved Special Use Permit (U-0075-00) for a
08/02/00
proposed Supper Club at 8991 West Sahara Avenue.
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]

The City Council approved Special Use Permit (SUP-28192) for a
Night Club use in conjunction with a proposed Night Club with a
waiver to allow a 60-foot distance separation from a child care facility
08/06/08
where 400 feet is required at 8991 West Sahara Avenue. The
Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommended approval of
the project.
The City Council approved Special Use Permit (SUP-27870) for a
Supper Club use in conjunction with a proposed Supper Club at 8991
08/06/08
West Sahara Avenue. The Planning Staff and Planning Commission
recommended approval of the project.
The City Council approved a Required Review (RQR-37641) of a
previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-27870) for an existing
09/02/10 4,344 square foot Supper Club with a waiver to allow a 60-foot
distance separation from a child care facility where 400 feet is
required at 8991 West Sahara Avenue.


Business License (#R09-01505) was issued for a restaurant use at
05/21/09 8991 West Sahara Avenue. The license became inactive as of
09/12/14.
Business License (#L21-00069) was issued for a Supperclub use at
05/21/09
8991 West Sahara Avenue. The license is listed as active.
A Tenant Improvement (TI-338184) was issued for interior remodel
03/27/17
work. The permit remains open.
04/20/17
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found a vacant restaurant
05/04/17 building within a shopping center. There were no signs of trash or
debris at the site.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.97

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Shopping Center
Property Commercial) Commercial)
R-PD18 (Residential
Multi-Family M (Medium Density
North Planned Development -
18 Units/Acre)
East Shopping Center
West Shopping Center

Sahara West Walkable Community Plan Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
CS
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141]

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial Streets and 150 FT Y
Highways
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Shopping
4,167 SF
Center
(existing 1/250 SF 17
(portion of
building)
site)
CS
SUP-70228

SUP-70228

bbAb

A
A
Ab
A
AA77

A

bbA7 7
AbA
A77
AA7A7
7A
77AAA7A
A7A7AA7
b77A7AA7 A
7 A77
A
7777777b7 A77 A

AA
7777777b7 bb
A
7777777b7
b bA
7777777b

A
7777777b
A
AA
7777777b7

SUP-70228

77A7b7A7AA77
77A77A7AA77
A77

A
b
A

77A

77A

7A7

7 7 7

7 7
7 7 7AA7

b

77

7A7 7b
AA77bA
7
7 7 7
7
7Ab
7
7
A

77A

A

7Ab
b
Ab
A
77A
7AA

b

A
A
7AA7

7A

7 AA

77A

7A
AA 7A7
7
AA7A7
7A
77AAA7A
A7A7AA7
7 7AA
A

A
7A

7A7A

AA7
bb

b

7
A
7Ab7
7
bA
7b
7 7
7
A b
AA
A7 bA77

SUP-70228
SUP-70228 [PRJ-70141] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: ZHI GANG WANG - OWNER: MRA, LLC
8991 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
7
A77
77
777A
777
7A
7777
777
b777
777
77777A777777
7777777777777A
7777b
7777777777777A7
777778777
777777777<7A77777A7
7777777<777777777
<77777<77777<777
77777<777777777
777777777777777
77877777777777
777777777777A
7777777
7777778777777A7
A777777A77A77777
77777777777778
77777777
A777877777b77777777
77777777777b7777
77777777A7
A777777777777777
777777777777777
7777777
<777777777
SUP-70228

SUP-70228

SUBJECT:
SDR-70254 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Site Development Plan Review FOR AN EXISTING 4,340 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL
RETAIL STORE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.60 acres at 501 South Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-34-
717-012), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-70146]. Staff


RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258 [PRJ-70146]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258 [PRJ-70146]
3. Supporting Documentation - SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258 [PRJ-70146]
4. Photo(s) - SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258 [PRJ-70146]
5. Justification Letter - SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258 [PRJ-70146]
6. Protest/Support Postcards for SDR-70254 and SDR-70256 [PRJ-70146
SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258 [PRJ-70146]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-70254 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-70256 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SDR-70254
SDR-70254
SDR-70256
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 778 - SDR-70254 and SDR-70256

778 - SDR-70258
PROTESTS 4 - SDR-70254 and SDR-70256

4 - SDR-70258
APPROVALS 1 - SDR-70254 and SDR-70256

1 - SDR-70258
PB
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (Z-0019-94) shall be

required, except as amended by conditions herein.
3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 05/02/17, except as amended by conditions
herein.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot-wide landscape

buffer along the south and west property lines were eight feet is required.
determine the most appropriate mapping action necessary to divide the existing
lots. The mapping action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of
any building permits.
Public Works
9. Upon remapping of this site, intersite access and cross drainage easements shall
remain unrestricted.
PB
Conditions Page Two
10. Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development
of this project with the Rainbow Boulevard Improvement Project - Westcliff Drive
to Sahara Avenue project, and any other public improvement projects adjacent to
this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.
Planning

herein.

buffer along the south property line and portions of the east and north property
lines were eight feet is required.
6. Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
PB
Public Works
Planning

herein.

buffer along the north property lines were eight feet is required.
PB
Conditions Page Four
Public Works
PB
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing Rainbow Plaza-Phase 2

commercial subdivision at the southwest corner of Alta Drive and Rainbow Boulevard to
both adjust property lines and allow for the removal of two newly created parcels
already developed with an existing Health Club and an existing Retail building
respectively.
ISSUES
SDR-70256 is for Parcel 1 (APN:138-34-717-011), currently developed with a Health

Club use and proposed to be reduced from 4.44 acres to 3.87 acres with the south
property line adjusted north approximately 42 feet.
The applicant has requested a waiver for Parcel 1 to allow a zero-foot-wide
landscape buffer along the south property line and portions of the east and north
property lines where eight feet is required. Staff supports the waiver request.
SDR-70254 is for Parcel 2 (APN:138-34-717-012), currently developed with a Retail

building and proposed to remain 0.59 acres in area.
landscape buffer along the west and south property lines where eight feet is
required. Staff supports the waiver request.
SDR-70258 is for Parcel 3 (APN:138-34-717-013), currently developed with a Multi-

Tenant Shopping Center and proposed to increase from 6.89 acres to 7.46 acres
with the north property line adjusted north approximately 42 feet.
landscape buffer along the north property line where eight feet is required. Staff
supports the waiver request.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting to remove two parcels from an existing commercial

subdivision (Rainbow Plaza-Phase Two). The first step in that process is to receive
approval of Site Development Plan Reviews to assure that the newly created parcels
will comply with the standards of Title 19. The site is developed with an existing
shopping center. (The parcels that will be created are to be removed from the
commercial subdivision with a separate action and are already developed with
standalone commercial buildings and associated parking.)
PB
The applicant is proposing to create Parcel 1 which would include the 24 Hour Fitness
at 601 South Rainbow Boulevard, Parcel 2 which would include the retail building at 501
South Rainbow Boulevard, and Parcel 3 which would include the retail buildings at 731,
737, 739, 741, 771, 805, 813, 815, 817, 821, 825, 827, 833 and 837 South Rainbow
Boulevard
The subject sites are all zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial) and the proposed lots comply
with all requirements of Title 19 for lot size, width, coverage and setbacks. Parking and
access is shared within a commercial subdivision and a condition of approval has been
included that will assure that this continues to be required regardless of the removal of
these parcels from the commercial subdivision. The sites are already developed with
buildings that were approved as part of Plot Plan Reviews associated with Rezonings
(Z-0019-94 and Z-0051-90) and a condition of approval will require continued
conformance to the standards established with those approvals.
The only aspect of the proposed project that is not in conformance with the
requirements of Title 19 is the perimeter buffer requirements along the new property
lines that are being created. The applicant has requested waivers to allow zero-foot-
wide perimeter buffers on the north property line of Parcel 3 (SDR-70258), the south
and west property lines of Parcel 2 (SDR-70254), the south property line of Parcel 1
(SDR-70256) and portions of the east and north property lines of Parcel 1 (SDR-70256).
Staff supports these waivers as the sites are already developed and will continue to
operate as a commercial shopping center with conditions of approval requiring shared
access and parking across all parcels regardless on being part of the commercial
subdivision or being removed from it.

The subject site is currently developed with a mix of retail uses provided as part of
an existing commercial shopping center. The proposed action will in no way affect
the use of the center by the public.
PB
an existing commercial shopping center. The site was developed in accordance
with Rezoning (Z-0019-94).

The existing commercial shopping center has shared access and parking and will
be conditioned to continue to provide that for its visitors. Therefore, the site will
continue to operate without negative impacts on adjacent roadways.
City;
with Rezoning (Z-0019-94) and the materials were determined to be appropriate
for the area at that time.

with Rezoning (Z-0019-94), and was determined to compatible with development
in the area at that time.
The subject site will continue to be subject to business licensing and building
permit review to assure that new businesses and any improvements to the site do
not risk the public health, safety and general welfare.

PB

City;

PB


City;

PB

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0051-90) from R-1 (Single
Family Residence) [a portion under Resolution of Intent to C-1] to C-1
(Limited Commercial) on 24.39 acres at the southwest corner of Alta
06/06/90 Drive and Rainbow Boulevard. The northern five acres were amended
to P-R (Professional Office and Parking). The request included a
proposed 296,540 square-foot expansion of an existing shopping center.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial.
The Department of Community Planning and Development
administratively approved a Review of Condition Number 4 of an
approved Rezoning (Z-0051-90), which required a 20-foot wide
02/10/92
perimeter landscape planter along Alta Drive and Rainbow Boulevard. A
buffer width of 14 feet along Rainbow Boulevard and 20 feet along Alta
Drive was approved.
A Final Map for a one-lot commercial subdivision (Rainbow Plaza
03/27/92 Phase 2) on 24.40 acres at the southwest corner of Alta Drive and
Rainbow Boulevard was recorded.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0019-94) from R-1 (Single
Family Residence) under Resolution of Intent to P-R (Professional Office
and Parking) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 5.05 acres at the
04/20/94 southwest corner of Alta Drive and Rainbow Boulevard. The request
included a plan for a proposed two-story, 46,858 square-foot gymnasium
and sports center. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.

PB

Parcel 1 (SDR-70256) - 601 South Rainbow Boulevard
A business license (#) was issued for a health/fitness club at 601
01/24/95 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was last renewed 10/1/16 and
is still active.
03/25/10 A building permit (#156754) for a Tenant Improvement (24 Hour
Fitness) at 601 South Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit was
final 10/01/10.
Parcel 2 (SDR-70254) - 501 South Rainbow Boulevard
A building permit (#317644) for electrical at 501 South Rainbow
05/12/16
Boulevard was issued. The permit has not been finaled.
Parcel 3 (SDR-70258) 731 741 & 771 - 837 South Rainbow Boulevard
A business license (#B05-02265) was issued for a hair salon at 827
05/28/93 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was last renewed 08/01/16 and
is still active.
A business license (#G50-07134) was issued for an electronics store
12/09/94 at 741 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was marked out-of-
A business license (#G50-02948) was issued for a retail furniture store
01/16/96 at 771 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was last renewed on
05/01/17 and is still active.
A business license (#A23-01692) was issued for a bookkeeper at 833
11/20/97 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was last renewed on 11/01/16
and is still active.
A business license (#N36-00009) was issued for a thrift store at 741
A business license (#G50-05521) was issued for a locksmith at 837
A building permit (#143656) for a sign (Results Realty) at 805 South
07/16/09
Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit had not been finaled.
A building permit (#196584) for electrical (PTs Pub) at 739 South
09/29/11
Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit was final 11/29/11
A building permit (#197272) for a sign (Sanams Eyebrow Threading)
10/12/11 at 821 South Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit was final
02/16/12.
A building permit (#200523) for electrical (JC Penney) at 771 South
01/05/12
Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit has not been finaled.
PB

Parcel 3 (SDR-70258) 731 741 & 771 - 837 South Rainbow Boulevard
A building permit (#225062) for fire sprinklers (American Lock and
12/03/12 Key) at 837 South Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit has not
been finaled.
A building permit (#234576) for a Tenant Improvement (Goodwill of
06/20/13 Nevada) at 741 South Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit was
final 09/12/2013.
A business license (#G50-09372) was issued for a retail store at 731
09/12/13 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was last renewed 03/01/17
A building permit (#246852) for a Tenant Improvement (Batteries Plus)
10/23/13 at 731 South Rainbow Boulevard was issued. The permit was final
04/20/16.
A business license (#G62-03117) was issued for a tobacco dealer at
03/20/14 825 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was last renewed on
07/01/16 and is still active.
A business license (#G63-04084) was issued for a real estate agent at
06/02/15 805 South Rainbow Boulevard. The license was marked inactive on
5/11/17.
Staff held a pre-application meeting with the applicant discussing the
04/20/17 request and the submittal requirements for Site Development Plan
Reviews.
Field Check
Staff completed a routine site visit, noting a well maintained, existing
05/04/17
commercial shopping center

Site Area Existing Proposed
Parcel 1 (SDR-70254) 4.44 net acres 3.87 net acres
PB

*Surrounding Existing Zoning
Property District
19.12 Designation
Shopping Center
R-CL (Single Family
Single Family ML (Medium Low Compact-Lot) &
North
Dwellings Density Residential) R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
South General Retail
Single Family ML (Medium Low R-CL (Single Family
Dwellings Density Residential) Compact-Lot)
East
C-1 (Limited
Office / Retail MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
Single Family L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
West
Dwellings Residential) Residential)
*Based on the perimeter of the entire existing commercial subdivision.

Trails N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
N/A
Assessment)

SDR-70256 SDR-70254 SDR-70258
Required/ Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 3
Standard Allowed Provided Provided Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size N/A 168,577 SF 25,700 SF 324,957 SF Y
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 342 Feet 160 Feet 266 Feet Y
PB
SDR-70256 SDR-70254 SDR-70258

Required/ Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 3
Standard Allowed Provided Provided Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 347 Feet 14 Feet 13 Feet Y
Side 10 Feet 38 Feet 68 Feet 43 Feet Y
Corner 10 Feet 102 Feet 14 Feet N/A Y
Rear 20 Feet 60 Feet 59 Feet 60 Feet Y
Maximum Lot
Coverage 50 % 16 % 17% 32% Y

LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Required Provided Compliance
Parcel 1 (SDR-70256)
Min. Zone Width
15 Feet (Right of Way) 19 Feet (Right of Way) Y
North 8 Feet Internal 0 Feet Internal *N
South 8 Feet 0 Feet *N

East 8 Feet 0 Feet *N
West 8 Feet 20 Feet Y
Min. Zone Width
North 15 Feet 20 Feet Y
East 15 Feet 15 Feet *N
Min. Zone Width
North 8 Feet 0 Feet *N
South **0 Feet 0 Feet Y
East 15 Feet 15 Feet Y
West **0 Feet 0 Feet Y
* The applicant has requested waivers to the buffer widths, staff supports those waivers
**Rezoning/Plot Plan Review (Z-0051-90) established these development standards
PB

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Rainbow Blvd Primary Arterial Streets and 150 Y
Highways Map
Master Plan of
Alta Drive Major Collector Streets and 75 N
Highways Map
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Shopping
251,223 sf 1/250 sf 1,005
Center
*The Commercial Subdivision provides shared parking; a condition of approval requires
that it continue regardless of the removal of two parcels from the subdivision.
Waivers
wide landscape
To provide an 8 foot wide buffer along the
landscape buffer along the south property line Approval
internal property lines. and portions of the
east and north
property lines.
To provide an 8 foot wide wide landscape
landscape buffer along the buffer along the west Approval
internal property lines. and south property
lines.
To provide an 8 foot wide
wide landscape
landscape buffer along the Approval
buffer along the north
internal property lines.
property line.
PB
SDR-70254

SDR-70254
SDR-70254
SDR-70254
SDR-70254
SDR-70254
SDR-70254

SDR-70254

77777777777
Ab7bA
7 7 7
7 777
A A 77
77777777777
$A7
77A777
bA7
7
bb
AA7
b 77
7
A 7 A
7 A 7
A A 77
A b7
7b A 7
7 7 7
77
7 7 7 b7A

A
7A7
777
A7AA7A7A7A
A b7
Ab77AA
A7
A 7AA77 AA
A b7

7777$777
7bAAAb7777
SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

77777777777
Ab7bA
7 7 7
7 777
A A 77
77777777777
"A7
77A777
bA7
7
bb
AA77 b 77
7
A 7 A
7 A 7
A A 77
7 7b A 7
7 7 7
77
b7A

A
A b7
7777
A7AA7A7A7A
Ab77AA
A b7
A7
A 7AA77 AA

7777"777
7bAAAb7777
SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

77777777777
Ab7bA
7 7 7
Ab77
7 777
A A 77
77777777777
"A7
77A777
bA7
7
bb
7 7
b 77
7
7 7
A 7 A
7 A 7
A A 77
Ab7
7b A 7
7 7
7 7 7
b7A

A7
A7

7
7
Ab7
7 7
7777
A777
A7AA7A7A7A
Ab77AA
7 7
7 7
Ab7
A 7AA77 AA
Ab7
"7bA777

7777"777
7bAAAb7777
SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

"7bA777

77777777777
Ab7bA
7 7 7
7 777
A A 77
77777777777
"A7
77A777
bA7
7 7
7
bb
7 7
Ab7
b 77
Ab7
A 7 A
7 A 7
A A 77
7b A 7
7 7 7
7 77 b7A

A7
7
7
7777
A777
A7AA7A7A7A
Ab77AA
A
7
7 7
A 7AA77 AA
Ab7

7777"777
7bAAAb7777
SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

SDR-70254 [PRJ-70146] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SDR-70256 AND SDR-70258 -
APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC
501 SOUTH RAINBOW BOULEVARD
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
b7777
777
777
7 7777
7 777
A7777
77
7777
7b77777b77777
77777777777777
77777777777777
777777777777
77777b777777
77777b77777777
7777777777

777777777b777
7777777777777777
7777777777777
77777b7777
777777777
7777777777777
77777777777
77777977777777777
7777777
777777777b777777
7777777777777
77777777777b77777
77b7977777777
77777777777
7777777777777b7
b

777777b77797777
9
777777777777

SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258

777777777777777
7
7777777777777
797777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77
9
SDR-70254, SDR-70256 and SDR-70258


SUBJECT:
SDR-70256 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SDR-70254 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR AN EXISTING 26,364 SQUARE-FOOT
HEALTH CLUB WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND PORTIONS OF THE
EAST AND NORTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 3.87 acres
at 601 South Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-34-717-011), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-70146]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SDR-70256

SDR-70256
SDR-70256
SDR-70256
SDR-70256
SDR-70256
SDR-70256

SDR-70256

SUBJECT:
SDR-70258 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SDR-70254 AND SDR-
70256 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIXTON-ALTO RAINBOW, LLC -
For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PORTION OF AN
EXISTING 251,223 SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW
A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY
LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 7.46 acres at 731, 737, 739, 741, 771, 805, 813,
815, 817, 821, 825, 827, 833 and 837 South Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-34-717-013), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-70146]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SDR-70258
SDR-70258
SDR-70258
SDR-70258
SDR-70258
SDR-70258
SDR-70258
SDR-70258

SUBJECT:
SDR-70240 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
CAPROCK EMERGENCY HOLDINGS, LLC - OWNER: NORTHWEST 95, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED TWO-
STORY, 28,118 SQUARE-FOOT HOSPITAL WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A FOUR-
FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE SOUTH PROJECT
BOUNDARY WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on a 2.79-acre portion of 15.78 acres at
the northeast corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango Drive (APN 125-17-701-001), T-C (Town
Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center Special Land Use Designation],
Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-70056]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CAPROCK EMERGENCY HOLDINGS, LLC -
OWNER: NORTHWEST 95, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 309
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (Z-0076-98).
herein.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow a four-foot perimeter

landscape buffer along the south property line where eight feet is required.
7. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,

Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device. The
technical landscape plan shall indicate a row of 24-inch box Chinese Pistache
trees (or similar drought tolerant trees) and four five-gallon shrubs per tree in the
space between rockery walls along the northern development boundary.
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
10. Assessors Parcel Number (APN) 125-17-801-005 is owned by the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) and the City has a BLM grant (N-73902) for roadway, sewer,
drainage, access, and landscaping within this parcel. Prior to approval of
construction drawings for this site, obtain the necessary easements or provide
proof of legal rights to construct improvements on BLM property not covered by the
Citys BLM grant.
11. Construct a paved vehicular and pedestrian access from Oso Blanca Road to this
site crossing Assessors Parcel Number (APN) 125-17-801-005 concurrent with
onsite development activities.
12. All private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.
13. Meet with the Sanitary Sewer Planning Section of the Department of Public Works
to determine an acceptable connection point to the 24-inch diameter sewer
interceptor in Durango Drive. Comply with the recommendations of the Sanitary
Sewer Planning Section.
of this project with the Centennial Parkway Channel West project and any other
public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the
recommendations of the City Engineer.
15. Obtain an Occupancy Permit from the Nevada Department of Transportation

(NDOT) for all driveways, pedestrian mid-block crossing, or other private
improvements in the Oso Blanca Road public right-of-way adjacent to this site prior
to constructing any improvements within NDOT jurisdiction.
16. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
Analysis. All additional rights-of-way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for

exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on-site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor
compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of
approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the
development of this site.
or grading permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved
drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended
by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to construct a two-story medical facility consisting of an

emergency room, 10 patient rooms for overnight stay and general offices to be
generally located at the northeast corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango Drive.
ISSUES
The applicant requests a Waiver from Title 19.08.040 to allow a four-foot perimeter
landscape buffer along the south property line where eight feet is required. Staff
recommends approval of the Waiver.
The proposed development is located on an irregularly shaped parcel of land that
must be accessed through the adjacent parcel to the south.
A condition of approval will require the technical landscape plan to indicate a row of
24-inch box Chinese Pistache trees (or similar drought tolerant trees) and four five-
gallon shrubs per tree in the space between rockery walls along the northern
development boundary.
ANALYSIS
The subject parcel is privately owned; however, access to the site is restricted to Oso
Blanca Road by way of easements provided by the Bureau of Land Management,
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, and the City of Las Vegas
through APN 125-17-801-005. The portion of APN 125-17-801-005 north of Oso Blanca
Road is planned to be developed as an extension of the RTC Park-N-Ride facility south
of Oso Blanca Road, but will contain an access driveway from Oso Blanca Road to the
subject site. Much of the subject parcel is encumbered by Nevada Department of
Transportation easements for U.S. 95 right-of-way and Durango Drive, constricting the
size of the actual development to 2.80 acres.
Site development is subject to the Town Center Development Standards Manual

(TCDSM), using SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) standards where
necessary. Where the TCDSM is silent (such as for perimeter landscape buffers),
LVMC Title 19 applies. The use is classified by the Town Center Development
Standards Manual as a Hospital with ancillary office use. Hospital is a conditional use
in the SC-TC District, requiring the use to be located on a secondary thoroughfare or
larger. Oso Blanca Road is classified as a Frontage Road and Durango is classified as
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
a Primary Arterial, although the development lacks direct access to either. For this
proposal, staff has determined that setbacks and buffers will be based on the usable
portion of the property, rather than the actual lot lines.
Town Center Streetscape Standards do not apply to the southern property line, as it has
no direct frontage on Oso Blanca Road. In order to allow for the provision of parking
and drive aisles within the development boundary, a portion of the perimeter landscape
buffer along the south (front) property line has been reduced to as little as four feet.
Staff recommends that the requested waiver of the eight-foot buffer requirement be
approved, as the developable part of the site is constricted by the various easements
and the front property line is set back approximately 95 feet from Oso Blanca Road. To
compensate for the reduced landscape buffer, the applicant is proposing additional
landscaping adjacent to the building and at the unusable corners of the project area.
The development as proposed will meet Town Center setback, height, open space,
parking and parking lot landscaping standards. Although the primary use of the
property will be a Hospital, parking standards are based on the Hospital, Clinic and
Office, Other than Listed uses in Title 19 so as to accommodate the demand for these
various uses of the site.
A rockery retaining wall is proposed along the north and west boundary lines. As
allowed per Title 19.08 by reference from the Town Center Development Standards
Manual, the wall is proposed to be stepped, with the initial wall being six feet tall, and a
secondary wall of two to six feet in height. A level landscaped area of at least five feet
is proposed between walls. A condition of approval will require the technical landscape
plan to indicate a row of 24-inch box Chinese Pistache trees (or similar drought tolerant
trees) and four five-gallon shrubs per tree in the space between rockery walls along the
northern development boundary.
The elevations are appropriate for the Town Center area and contain numerous
changes in roofline and wall plane for visual interest. Exterior materials vary from split
and uniform limestone, brick, low reflective metal panels to stucco and glazing.
The proposed Hospital development is compatible with the adjacent uses, is

appropriately located along two Major Collectors and a freeway, and is consistent with
Town Center development objectives and standards. The design is well integrated into
the irregular shape of the land parcel and limited development area, and the landscape
buffer waiver is justified given its location relative to the public right-of-way. Staff
therefore recommends approval, subject to conditions. If denied, permits would not be
able to be issued for construction as proposed.
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]

The proposed Hospital would be located on a major thoroughfare adjacent to a

freeway and away from residential uses. The development will be near
commercial services of similar intensity.
The development as proposed conforms to all Town Center Development

Standards. A Waiver of Title 19.08 is required to allow a reduced landscape
buffer along the south property line, but staff supports this waiver because it is set
back approximately 95 feet from Oso Blanca Road and will still contain sufficient
buffer plantings. A condition of approval will require the technical landscape plan
to indicate specific landscaping materials between rock walls.

Access to the site would be from an easement through the property to the south
(APN 125-17-801-005). Traffic to and from Oso Blanca Road is not expected to
be heavy, and therefore the impact to the neighborhood would be minimal. Based
on peak hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 146 additional
cars, or about five every two minutes.
City;
Building materials are varied and include split and uniform limestone, brick, low
reflective metal panels, stucco and glazing. These materials are permitted by the
Town Center Development Standards and are appropriate for this area.
Landscape materials include drought tolerant trees, shrubs and natural
groundcover, which are appropriate for the area.

SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
The building elevations provided create an orderly and pleasing environment and
are appropriate for the Town Center area.
Site development will be subject to building permit review and inspection, thereby
safeguarding the public health, safety and general welfare.

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) from U
(Undeveloped), R-E (Residence Estates), R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development - 7 Units Per Acre), R-PD11 (Residential Planned
12/07/98 Development - 18 Units Per Acre), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot),
C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2 (General Commercial), C-V (Civic), and
PD (Planned Development) Zones to T-C (Town Center) on 1,468
acres within the area designated Town Center on the Northwest
Amendment to the General Plan. The Planning Commission and staff
Review (SDR-3795) for a proposed 293,355 square-foot retail center
with waivers of the Town Center Development Standards requiring
onsite open space features, parking spaces to be set back a minimum
of 15 feet from property lines, parking lots to be located away from
04/07/04 street frontages and pedestrian walkways to be provided between
parking lots and rows of parking spaces on 46.00 acres at the
northwest and northeast corners of Severence Lane and Oso Blanca
Road and at the northeast corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango
The approval expired 04/08/06.
The City Council approved requests for 13 Special Use Permits (SUP-
5423, 5424, 5425, 5426, 5427, 5428, 5429, 5430, 5431, 5432, 5433,
5434, and 5435) for various uses within a proposed retail center at the
01/05/05 northwest and northeast corners of Severence Lane and Oso Blanca
Road and at the northeast corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango
Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of
all requests. The approvals expired 01/06/07.
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]


There are no building permits or business licenses relevant to development of this site.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss
submittal requirements for a Site Development Plan Review
application. Issues were discussed related to the location of
handicapped parking, perimeter and parking lot landscaping. As the
04/18/17
site is constrained by easements for U.S. 95 right-of-way and Durango
Drive, staff determined that setbacks and perimeter buffers would be
based on the usable portion of the parcel rather than the actual lot
lines.
Field Check
05/04/17 The site is undeveloped and free of trash and debris.

Site Area
Net Acres 2.79 of 15.78

Property District
19.12 Designation
SC-TC (Service
Subject
Undeveloped Commercial Town T-C (Town Center)
Property
Center)
North U.S. 95 Freeway Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
Transit Passenger PF-TC (Public
South Facility (partially Facilities Town T-C (Town Center)
undeveloped) Center)
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]

Property District
19.12 Designation
East U.S. 95 Freeway Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
SC-TC (Service
West Shopping Center Commercial Town T-C (Town Center)
Center)

Town Center Master Plan Y
T-C (Town Center) District Y
Trails (Town Center Parkway Trail Durango Drive) N/A*
N/A
Assessment)
*Durango Drive is not directly adjacent to the site, and therefore no improvements are
necessary as part of this Site Development Plan Review.
Pursuant to the Town Center Development Standards Manual and Title 19.08, the
following standards apply:
Min. Lot Size N/A 121,532 SF N/A
Min. Lot Width N/A 520 Feet N/A
Min. Setbacks
Corner N/A N/A N/A
Max. Lot Coverage N/A 18.7 % N/A
Max. Building Height 2 Stories 2 Stories/40 Feet Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Screened, Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure Y
Roof or Trellis Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and the Town Center Development Standards Manual, the
following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 22 Trees 36 Trees Y
South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 30 Trees 33 Trees Y
East N/A N/A N/A N/A
West 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 7 Trees 13 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 59 Trees 82 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
30 Trees 30 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
Min. Zone Width
South 15 Feet 4 Feet N
East N/A N/A N/A
6-foot
rockery
retaining
wall along
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential north Y
boundary,
with stepped
back wall of
2-6 feet
Open Space Town Center

Total Site Required Provided Compliance
Acreage Percent Area Percent Area
121,532 SF 20% 24,306 SF 28% 34,424 SF Y
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Streets and
Highways Map/
Durango Drive Primary Arterial 137 Y
Town Center
Development
Standards Manual
Master Plan of
Streets and
Frontage Road
Oso Blanca Highways Map/
Town Center 100 Y
Road Town Center
Collector
Development
Standards Manual
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
1.5
spaces
10 beds
Hospital per 15
(10,863 SF)
patient
bed
1 space
per 200
SF GFA
up to
Clinic 11,966 SF 2,000 SF 50
+1
space
per 250
SF addl
1 space
Office, Other
5,289 SF per 300 18
Than Listed
SF GFA
Loading 10-29,999
28,118 SF 2 2 Y
Spaces SF range
SS
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056]
Waivers
8-foot perimeter landscape To allow a 4-foot perimeter
buffer along all interior lot landscape buffer along the Approval
lines south property line
SS
SDR-70240

SDR-70240

b7bbA7
7A77 A7
bA7AA
A7 AA
bb 7
A 7
A7b 777

7Ab7
A7A 7
777b
b7Ab 777
7A7
A77AA
7A7
A777Ab

7777777777777777777777A7
7A77
b bb777Ab7&77&
7
b
7

b7A7A 777777777777Ab777&

&&b777Ab77&

b7Ab777Ab7A7&

A777Ab

b7A7A

AAb A777A7Ab
777777777777b77bAb7Ab
7
7 7777Ab
7 A

A7777Ab

7 &A77
7Ab77
7
AbA7AA777&
7

7 7

bA7&7AbA7AA

77777777777777777777777A77
77

7
7

7 7
7

7 A
A7
b
7A 7 7 7 7 7 77

A7Abb7Ab 7
7 7A7 A7Abb 7

7 7b7A
7 7 7 7 7Ab7
7 7

7
7

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
b7A7A7 7
b7Ab77A77
b7A
7A7 A7

7 7 7 7
bA77777

A
77A
bAb7A7 AbA7A
A
7
7A
7AbA777A7A777777777777777777777777777
SDR-70240
7b
A7A
b7bbA
77A7
7A7
7b
A7A
7b
A7A
bAb7b
A7A7

7
A7bbA
7b
A
7
7
b7Ab
7A
A
A7A7A
77A
A77
7Ab7A
7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 7 7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 7 7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7
777 777 77
7A7 77 7 7 777 77 A7bb7
A7
7@7 777 77

A
b7 77
7 A77 7b7A7 77
7777 77 7 7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7

77
7 A7777777777777
b7 7777 77
b
7 A77777777
A7bb7
77A7 b77 77
77 77 77
A7bb7
7 77 77
7Ab77 b AbA7A7A777 7
b7 7 777 777 77 7 A777

A7bb7
A7A7Ab77 7Ab7 7 777 77 7 A7b7A7Ab
b
A77Ab 77 A777A7A77777
A77Ab77 7 A777777
7A7Abb
A77Ab77 7 A77777
7Ab7A

SDR-70240
7b
A7A
b7bbA
77A7
A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 7A7
7b
A7A
7b
A7A
bAb7b
A7A7

7
A7bbA
7b
A
A
A
A
A7 A
A
A7 A
A7 A
A
A7 A7 A
A
A
A
A
7
7
b7Ab
7A
A
A7A7A
77A
A77
7Ab7A
7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 7 7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 7 7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7
777 777 77
7A7 77 7 7 777 77 A7bb7
A7
7@7 777 77

A
b7 77
7 A7 A77 7b7A7 77
7777 77 7 7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7

77
7 A7777777777777
b7 7777 77
b
7 A77777777
A7bb7
77A7 b77 77
77 77 77
A7bb7
7 77 77
7Ab77 b AbA7A7A777 7
b7 7 777 777 77 7 A777

A7bb7
A7A7Ab77 7Ab7 7 777 77 7 A7b7A7Ab
b
A77Ab 77 A777A7A77777
A77Ab77 7 A777777
7A7Abb
A77Ab77 7 A77777
7Ab7A

SDR-70240
777AA
77
A7A7A777
A7A7A777
bb
77A7 77A

AbbA77 77
777A
A7A7A A7A7A
77 77
7
77
A7A
7 b7A
A7bA
A7
7

7 7 7 7
A7bAA7A77 A7A A77A77
7Ab77A
A7A 77bAb77 77bAb77
bA7777
A77A77
77bAb777 777AA
77
bb
AbbA77 A7bAA7A77
77bAb77
7Ab77b
A
77
A7A7A
77
A7A7A bAA7A7
77
7
77
A7bAA7A
7777bAb
A7A7A
7
77
bAA7A7
7

7 7 7
b7A7 7Ab77A A77A77
7A7 77bAb77
bA7777
A7

77A7 A
bAb7A A
AbA7A

7A

7AbA777A7A777777777777777777777777777

SDR-70240
77A
A7A7A777 777AA
77
77A
A7A7A
77
A7bAA
A777 77
A7A7A 7bAb77
77
A7A

A7bAA
A77A A777
777 7bAb77
bAb77
7
77
A7A7A
77
7Ab77A
7

7Ab77A7 b7A7 7Ab77A
7A
bA77777 7 7 7 7
77A
A7A7A
777 777AA
77
A7bAA bb
A777
7bAb77

A7A 77

A7A

bb
A7A7A
77
7
77
A7A
A7A7A
77
A7bAA7A
7777bAb
7
7

7Ab77A7 A77A77 7Ab77A A7bA A7A

77bAb77 A7
7A
7 7 7 7
bA77777
A7

77A A
bAb7A7 AbA7A
A

7
7A

7AbA777A7A777777777777777777777777777
SDR-70240
7

A
b7

A A77 7
b 7 A A A 7
A 7

7 Ab7
7 7 7 7
7 7

A

7
7A
7
b
Ab
77 bA
A A
7

77 7 A
7 7
b
b
7
7Ab 7Ab A7 A7
bA Ab
AA 7 77 7 7 7
A777
AAb A A
7 7 A 7
7 7
7 b
A!!7 7
7 7Ab
77 7 7
7 7
7 A77
7
b
A7 7
7 bb

77 !!7 !!7 !!7 !!7 !!7 !! !!7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 A77
77 bA bA 7
7 b 7

A bA
7 7 7
7Ab ! 7b
7 7
Ab7
77 b
7

77
A7!!b
7 77 7
A7
A7
7 7
A
7 7
7 !!7 7
b
A!!7
A 7 7
b 77
7 !!
7A bA 7 bA
7 A b!
A
7 7 7 7
bA A 7 A77
bA 7 b A!! 7 7
7 7
7
7 A 7
77
b 7
7 77 7 7 7
77 7
A
A 7 7 b!
b 7
7
7
77 b7Ab
7 b
7 !!7

!A 7
77
A7

A7 A7 A7 7
b7Ab
b b 7 7 7
b!
7 7 7
b
A7 A77 A77 A77 A77 A77 7
77 7 7 7 7
A 7
A7
7 A7 A7
7 7 7
7 7

A7
7A7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
!bA7AA77!7!7A7 !bA7AA77b7!7A7
bA77777 bA7777
A7

77A

A
bAb7A7 AbA7A
A
7
!7A
7AbA777A7A777777777777777777777777777
SDR-70240

A7777
bA

b7A7A77A
bA7777

7
7

b7A7A77A7b
bA7777
7A
A7777

b7A7A7b7 b7A7A7b7
bA7777 bA7777
A7

A
77A
bAb7A AbA7A
A

b7A
7AbA777A7A777777777777777777777777777 A
SDR-70240
b7bbA777A7
777 b7bA7A
A7bbA b7bbA
7b 77A7
7Ab7
7A7
7A7
7Ab77
A
7Ab7
7Ab77 77
b7Ab77A77
b7Ab77A
A77A
7 7 7 7
bA77777
A7

bAb7A7 77A A
AbA7A
A A77A
7AbA777A7A7777777777777777777777777777

SDR-70240
A7bAA7A
777
AA7A77
7bA
bAb7777
bb
A7A7A7
b777A
7
b7A A7b7777
777AA
777 77A

77
7
77
7

7Ab77A
A
A7

77A

A
bAb7A7 AbA7A
A
7
7AA
7AbA777A7A777777777777777777777777777
SDR-70240
SDR 70240
Caprock Emergency Holdings, LLC
NEC Oso Blanca Road & Durango Drive

Proposed 28.118 thousand square foot medical clinic.
Proposed Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 31.45 884

AM Peak Hour CLINIC [1000 SF] 28.118 0.93 26
PM Peak Hour 5.18 146
Existing traffic on nearby streets:

Oso Blanca Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,800
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 944
Durango Drive
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,994
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:

Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Oso Blanca Road 35,490
Durango Drive 53,445
This project will add approximately 884 trips per day on Oso Blanca Dr., and Durango Dr. Currently, Oso Blanca is at
about 33 percent of capacity and Durango is at about 70 percent of capacity. With this project, Oso Blanca is expected to
be at about 36 percent of capacity and Durango to be at about 72 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 146 additional cars, or about five every two
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.
SDR-70240 [PRJ-70056] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: CAPROCK EMERGENCY

HOLDINGS, LLC - OWNER: NORTHWEST 95, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF OSO BLANCA ROAD AND DURANGO DRIVE
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
SDR-70240

SDR-70240

SDR-70240

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - GPA-69220 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA - OWNER: BANK OF NORTH LAS VEGAS -
For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: DR (DESERT RURAL
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 11.95 acres at the
northeast corner of Trails End Avenue and Homestead Road (APNs 125-05-503-001 and 002),
Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-69151]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL
1. Abeyance Request Letter - GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151].pdf
3. Staff Report - GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
7. Clark County School District Development Tracking Form - GPA-69220 and ZON-69224
[PRJ-69151]
8. Protest Postcard for GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]

9/% May 22, 2017

0D\

1LFROH(GGRZHV06
3ODQQHU,,
&LW\RI/DV9HJDV
'HSDUWPHQWRI3ODQQLQJ
15DQFKR'UUG)ORRU
/DV9HJDV19

68%-(&7 0RFFDVLQ*3$ =21

'HDU1LFROH

2QEHKDOIRIRXUFOLHQW9DOOH\%DQNRI1HYDGDZHUHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVWWKH*HQHUDO3ODQ
$PHQGPHQWDQG=RQH&KDQJHWREHKHDUGFRQFXUUHQWO\ZLWKWKHXSFRPLQJ7HQWDWLYH0DS
9DOOH\%DQNRI1HYDGDZRXOGOLNHWKHDSSOLFDWLRQVWRJRFRQFXUUHQWVLQFHWKH\DUHFRPSDQLRQ
LWHPVRQWKHVDPHVLWH:HH[SHFWWKDWWKHVHFRPSDQLRQLWHPVZLOOEHKHDUGDWWKH6HSWHPEHU
3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQPHHWLQJDQGWKH2FWREHU&LW\&RXQFLO0HHWLQJ

6LQFHUHO\
6ODWHU+DQLIDQ*URXS,QF

&KHOVHD-HQVHQ
6HQLRU3URMHFW&RRUGLQDWRU

GPA-69220 and ZON-69224

GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA - OWNER: BANK
OF NORTH LAS VEGAS
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-69220 Staff recommends DENIAL.
ZON-69224 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-69220
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 110
PROTESTS 1
APPROVALS 0
NE
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request to amend the General Plan land use designation on a 11.95-acre
portion of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan located at the northeast corner of Trails End
Avenue and Homestead Road from DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to R (Rural
Density Residential) and to Rezone the subject 11.95-acre site from R-E (Residence
Estates) to R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted).
ISSUES
In accordance with Title 19.16, a public hearing is required for both the General Plan
Amendment application and the Rezoning application.
ANALYSIS
The subject sites are currently designated DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) which
allows densities up to 2.49 units per acre. To the west of the subject sites is a five-acre
parcel that is included in Planning Area A2 of the Interlocal Agreement between the City of
Las Vegas and County of Clark adopted on December 21, 2016. This agreement
mandates areas identified as Planning Area A1 and A2 must remain residential and
designated at a density of no greater than 2.0 Units per Groass Acre on the Parties
respective comprehensive plans.
East of the subject sites is a residential development zoned R-PD2 (Residential Planned
Development 2 Units Per Acre), with single family, detached homes. South of the subject
sites are undeveloped lots zoned R-E (Residence Estates), which also allows a density no
less than two residential units per acre. Designating the subject sites R (Rural Density
Residential) that would allow a density up to 3.59 units per acre is not compatible with the
existing surrounding area that allows a maximum density of two units per acre. Staff does
not support the General Plan Amendment or the Rezoning application as the density
proposed would create an island of higher density residential amongst lower density
development.
An abeyance has been requested by the applicant in order to allow time for the
submittal of a Petition to Vacate Homestead Road and a Tentative Map application that
will demonstrate an overall neighborhood layout that would include the five acre parcel
to the west of the subject sites. Staff will reevaluate the proposed development once a
Petition to Vacate and Tentative Map are submitted.
NE
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
FINDINGS (GPA-69220)
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following
conditions be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is

compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,
The subject site is adjacent to property designated RNP (Rural Neighborhood

Preservation), which allows a minimum density of 2.0 units per acre, and property
designated PCD (Planned Community Development), which also allows a
minimum of 2.0 units per acre. Amending the General Plan to R (Rural), which
allows for up to 3.59 units per acre, is not compatible with the existing adjacent
land use designations.
2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be

compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,
The R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation allows the R-E
(Residence Estates), the proposed R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted),
and the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning districts. The existing
surrounding land uses consist of undeveloped lots and single-family, detached
dwelling units zoned either R-E (Residence Estates) or R-PD2 (Residential
Planned Development 2 Units Per Acre) with minimum lot sizes of
approximately one-half acre, or 20,000 square feet. The R-D (Single Family
Residential-Restricted) requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, and
the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district has a minimum lot size of
6,500 square feet. This is half to one-third of the minimum lot sizes surrounding
the subject sites and is not compatible.
3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and
If approved, half street improvements would be required with any future

development to provide adequate roadways for the subject sites.
4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and

policies that include approved neighborhood plans.
The subject sites are currently designated DR (Desert Rural Density

Residential) which allows densities up to 2.49 units per acre. To the west of the
subject sites is a five-acre parcel that is included in the Interlocal Agreement
between the City of
NE
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
Las Vegas and County of Clark adopted on December 21, 2016. This agreement
mandates these parcels designated by the agreement to remain residential with a
density no greater than 2.0 units per acre. Designating property adjacent to this
parcel that would allow a density up to 3.59 units per acre is not compatible to
other applicable plans within the immediate area.

If the companion General Plan Amendment application is approved, the proposed

R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) would conform to the General Plan.
districts.
The R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) zoning district allows for single-
family, detached development with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet,
which is half the minimum size of the adjacent R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
district to the west and south. The R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district
requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet.
Development surrounding the subject sites consists of single-family detached

homes and undeveloped lots ranging in size from approximately 19,000 square
feet to approximately 46,000 square feet. 10,000 square-foot residential lots are
not compatible with the surrounding community.

If developed, the property owner would be required to install half-street

improvements adjacent to the subject sites in order to provide adequate access
the site.
NE
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]

Staff administratively approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SD-0067-01) for proposed electrical overhead transmission
lines located adjacent to the south side of the Moccasin Road
12/11/01
alignment, between US-95 and Jones Boulevard and bearing east-
southeast from Moccasin Road and Jones Boulevard to Decatur
Boulevard.
The Planning Commission voted (4-0) to hold GPA-69220 and ZON-
04/11/17 69224 in abeyance to the June 13, 2017 Planning Commission
meeting.
Most Recent Change of Ownership for 125-05-503-001 and 002


Drainage Study (DS3456-1) was approved for Log Cabin Ranch
10/08/09
access road mass grading.
02/21/17 requirements for a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
application were discussed.
Meeting Start Time: 6:00 p.m.
Meeting End Time: 7:15 p.m.
Attendance: 1 Representative from the Planning Department;

03/22/17 2 Representatives from Ward 6 Mayor Pro Tem Ross;
4 Representatives for the applicant;
2 Representatives from Clark County, District B;
and approximately 9 members of the public (neighbors).

NE
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
The meeting opened with a presentation of the proposed project by the
applicants engineer followed by a question and answer session. Some
of the questions and concerns expressed by the neighbors included:
Some residents do not want Homestead vacated, a few were in
agreement with the proposal. There is concern as to how traffic
would proceed through the neighborhood once Homestead
Road was vacated and if other streets would see an increase in
traffic levels.
The residents do not want the subject properties rezoned to R-
D, the residents want the property to remain zoned R-E. There
is concern that the proposed plans would be discarded later and
the property would be developed to the minimum lot size of
10,000 square feet allowed by the R-D zoning district.
There is concern in regards to home values. If the subject sites
are developed to the lot minimums with small homes, the
surrounding properties value would drop.
Questions were raised as to whether or not horses could be
kept on property zoned R-D. The R-D zoning district requires
the minimum lot size to be 18,000 square feet for a horse. Staff
informed the neighbors that it is possible to develop a horse
friendly neighborhood.
Questions were also raised in regards to half street
improvements and how that would affect the roads currently not
improved, and those roadways within the County.
Representatives from Clark County District B indicated they
would look into the matter further.
A representative for the bank owned properties gave a brief history of

the bank came to own the properties and expressed their willingness
to work with the neighbors to have the best result possible for
everyone involved while realizing not everyone would be pleased with
the proposal. A representative for the adjacent 5 acre parcel (not part
of this action) also gave insight as to the thought process that went
into the current configuration of the combined 17 plus acres. He also
expressed to the neighbors a willingness to work with them for a
successful outcome.
Currently the neighbors use Homestead Road as a horse pathway to

the adjacent desert area for riding. One neighbor mentioned the idea
of having a horse trail installed along the western edge of parcel
number 125-05-502-014 if Homestead Road was vacated. The
applicants were open to the idea of creating a horse trail.
NE
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]
The residents requested another neighborhood meeting with an
expanded notification area. Staff asked the neighbors which residents
they would like to be included and mapped with the applicants
representative a custom notification area to be created for the next
neighborhood meeting. This neighborhood meeting would be
scheduled in approximately one month. At the conclusion of the
meeting, the applicants representatives and the neighbors agreed to
continue to work together for the best solution possible.
Field Check
During a routine field check, staff observed the undeveloped site.
03/02/17
Nothing of concern was noted by staff.

Site Area
Gross Acres 11.95

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject DR (Desert Rural R-E (Residence
Undeveloped
Property Density Residential) Estates)
U (Undeveloped) [TND
TND (Traditional (Traditional
North Undeveloped Neighborhood Neighborhood
Development) Development) General
Plan Designation]
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood R-E (Residence
South Undeveloped
Preservation Estates)
Residential Density)
PCD (Planned R-PD2 (Residential
Single Family,
East Community Planned Development
Detached
Development) 2 Units Per Acre)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood R-E (Residence
West Undeveloped
Preservation Estates)
Residential Density)
NE
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224 [PRJ-69151]

Centennial Hills Sector Plan Y
Northwest Open Space Plan Y
Trails Multi-Use Non-Equestrian (Moccasin Road) N*
Assessment)
*Half street improvements that include a Multi-Use Non-Equestrian trail would be
required adjacent to Moccasin Road when the subject sites are developed.
Existing General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed

DR (Desert Rural 0 2 dwelling units/
0 - 23
Residential Density) gross acre
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
R (Rural Residential 2.1 3.5 dwelling units/
25 41
Density) gross acre

20,000 SF
R-E (Residence Estates) 26
Minimum Size Lot
R-D (Single Family 10,000 SF
52
Residential-Restricted) Minimum Size Lot

Governing
Street Name Classification of Street Width with Street
Document
Street(s) (Feet) Section
Moccasin
Local Title 13 N/A N
Road
Homestead
Local Title 13 20 N
Road
Trails End
Local Title 13 N/A N
Avenue
*Moccasin Road and Trails End Avenue have not been installed. As part of an approved
development, the subject sites would be required to construct the half-street improvements
adjacent to the subject sites.
NE
GPA-69220 77
7777
777
77

GPA-69220

GPA-69220
TND PR-OS
MOCCASIN RD
PCD
DR
RNP
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
N DURANGO DR
TRAILS END AVE
HOMESTEAD RD
FOUR VIEWS ST
SOLITUDE SUMMIT ST
ROCKY AVE
CABIN DR
FROM DR TO R
General Plan Amendment
1000' Buffer
RNP - Rural Neighborhood MLA - Medium - Low Attached GTC - Tourist Commercial PF-CC Public Facility
Preservation Clark County
LVMD - Las Vegas Medical City Limits
M - Medium
RE - Rural Estates District TC - Town Center
H - High LI/R - Light Industrial / Research Not City
DR - Desert Rural RC - Resource Conservation
PCD - Planned Community
R - Rural O - Office
Development C - Downtown - Com mercial Subject Property GIS maps are normally produced
only to meet the needs of the City.
Due to continuous development activity
SC - Service Com mercial PR-OS - Park/Recreation/ this map is for reference only.
L - Low MXU - Downtown - Mixed Use Geographic Inform ation System
Open Space Planning & Development Dept.
ML - Medium - Low GC - General Commercial TND - Tradional Neighborhood 702-229-6301
PF - Public Facility
Development Date: Thursday, March 02, 2017
A77
AA

A
bA7A
77
77A777A7A77
AA7 AA7
A A
7 7

7 7 7 7 7
b7A
7 7 7

7
A

A7A

7
7 7 7
7 7
7AA7bA

A77A
A
A7
7
GPA-69220 and ZON-69224

GPA-69220 [PRJ-69151] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-69224 - APPLICANT: VALLEY BANK
OF NEVADA - OWNER: BANK OF NORTH LAS VEGAS
NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRAILS END AVENUE AND HOMESTEAD ROAD
03/02/17
03/02/17
03/02/17
03/02/17

&77
b777
b77
777
7777
77 77A7777
77A777b77
7777
7777777777777777
77777A7A7777b7b7777777
7777777777777777777
7777777777777777777
77777777777777777777A77
b7777A777777777777b777
777777
777777A7777b
7 7777777777777777777
77777777777777777
7777777777777777
7b7
7 77777777777777
7777777777777777
77777777777777
77777777777777777
77777777777777
777777777777777777
7777777777A77777777
77777777777777
7 77777777777777777777A
7777777777777777777
77A77777777777777
77777777777
7 777777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777777777777777
77777777777777
777777777777777777

77A777777777777777

GPA-69220 and ZON-69224

7A777b77
777
7 7777777777777
777777777777777
777777777777A777
777777777777777777
77777777777777777
7777777777777
777777777777777777
7777777
7777777777777777A7
77777777777777777
77
7777777777777777
77777
7777777777777
77
77
77

77A777777777777777

GPA-69220 and ZON-69224

GPA-69220 and ZON-69224

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - ZON-69224 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-69220 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA - OWNER: BANK OF NORTH LAS VEGAS -
For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-D
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-RESTRICTED) on 11.95 acres at the northeast corner of
Trails End Avenue and Homestead Road (APNs 125-05-503-001 and 002), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
ZON-69224 77
7777
777
77

ZON-69224

ZON-69224
U(TND) U(PROS
MOCCASIN RD
R-E
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
N DURANGO DR
TRAILS END AVE
HOMESTEAD RD
R-PD2
FOUR VIEWS ST
SOLITUDE SUMMIT ST
ROCKY AVE
CABIN DR
Zoning FROM R-E TO R-D

Undeveloped Density Residential 1000' Buffer
R-A - Ranch Acres
Residential City Limits
R-E - Residential Estates R-4 - High Density
R-D - Single-Family Residential C-D - Designed Commercial P-C - Planned Community Not City
Residential-Restricted R-5 - Apartment
R-PD - Residential C-1 - Limited Commercial T-D - Traditional Development Subject Property GIS maps are normally produced
Planned Development Home Residence Due to continuous development activity
C-2 - General Commercial PD - Planned Development
R-1 - Single Family this map is for reference only.
Geographic Inform ation System
Manufactured Home Park
Planning & Development Dept.
R-CL - Single-Family Park 702-229-6301
Compact-Lot P-R - Professional Offices Date: Thursday, March 02, 2017

and Parking

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - GPA-68781 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: BRITIM CONSTRUCTION - OWNER: MATLOCK HOLDINGS IV, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.49 acres at 5097 Roberta
Lane (APN 138-13-801-002), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68576]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
1. Withdrawal Request Letter - GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
3. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
7. Clark County School District Development Tracking Form - GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and
SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
8. Clark County Department of Aviation Comments - GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784
[PRJ-68576]
9. Protest Comment Form for GPA-68781 and Protest/Support Postcards for GPA-68781 and
ZON-68782 [PRJ-68576] and Protest Petition with Approximately 72 Signatures for GPA-
68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
May 30 2017
May 25, 2017
City of Las Vegas

Planning Department
3rd Floor
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Melvin Green
Principal
Attention: Department of Planning
Emanuele Arguelles
Principal
Regarding: Brooks Apartment Complex
APN(s): 138-13-801-002
Letter of Withdrawal for General Plan Amendment GPA-68781, Rezoning ZON-68782,

Site Development Plan Review SDR-68784.
KME Architects, LLC on behalf of our client, Matlock Holdings IV LLC, (MH) is pleased
to submit this formal letter requesting that the current applications for a General Plan
Amendment (GPA), Rezoning (ZON), and Site Development Plan Review (SDR) for a
proposed Apartment Complex with clubhouse be withdrawn without prejudice from the
June 13, 2017 Planning Commission meeting.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Melvin Green
GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784

archItecture
5588 south fort apache rd., suite 110 l a s v e g a s n e v a d a 8 9 1 4 8 sustaInabledesIgn
o 7 0 2 8 8 8 2 0 8 8 | f 7 0 2 8 8 8 2 0 8 9 | www.kmearchitects.com masterplannIng
GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BRITIM CONSTRUCTION - OWNER: MATLOCK
HOLDINGS IV, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-68781 Staff recommends DENIAL.
ZON-68782 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-68781
SDR-68784 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to GPA-68781
conditions: ZON-68782
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 353 - GPA-68781 and ZON-68782

353 - SDR-68784
PROTESTS 87 - GPA-68781
86 - ZON-68782
86 - SDR-68784
APPROVALS 1 - GPA-68781 and ZON-68782

1 - SDR-68784
JB
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-68781) and Rezoning (ZON-68782)

shall be required, if approved.
herein.
6. The minimum distance between buildings shall be 10 feet.

Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.
9. Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the
subject site. A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any
future building permit applications related to the site
JB
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
11. Dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way adjacent to this site for Roberta Lane and dedicate
a 15-foot radius on the southeast corner of Roberta Lane and Apricot Lane.
12. Construct half-street improvements including appropriate over paving on Roberta

Lane and Apricot Lane adjacent to this site concurrent with development of this
site. Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc.,
located within public rights-of-way, past the boundaries of this site prior to
construction of hard surfacing (asphalt or concrete).
13. A minimum of two lanes of asphalt pavement on the major access street (Roberta
Lane) adjacent to this site, and a working sanitary sewer connection shall be in
place prior to final inspection of any units within this development. All off-site
improvements adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped areas
between the perimeter walls and adjacent public streets, shall be constructed and
accepted prior to issuance of building permits beyond 75%. The above thresholds
notwithstanding, all required improvements shall be constructed within 24 months
of approval of construction drawings. No partial bond releases will be allowed until
all perimeter roadway improvements are in place.
14. Extend public sewer in Apricot Lane from Roberta Lane to the southern edge of
this site at a size, depth and location acceptable to the Collection System Planning
section of the Department of Public Works.
of this site. In lieu of constructing improvements, in whole or in part, the developer
may agree to contribute monies for the construction of neighborhood or local
drainage improvements, the amount of such monies shall be determined by the
JB
approved Drainage Plan/Study and shall be contributed prior to the issuance of

any building or grading permits, or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first, if allowed by the City Engineer.
17. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Site
Development Plan Review is in concept only. Specific design and construction
details relating to size, type and/or alignment of public improvements, including but
not limited to street, sewer and drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to
submittal of a construction drawings. We note that the plan view shows a
conventional 60-foot street while the cross section depicts a narrow 60-foot street.
Due to existing improvements and the availability of existing rights-of-way, the
conventional 60-foot street must be used for this site.
JB
April 11, 2016 - Planning Commission Meeting
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct a two-story, 40-unit apartment complex, on

approximately 2.49 acres located at 5097 Roberta Lane.
ISSUES
The applicant has proposed to amend the General Plan land use designation of the
property from R (Rural Density Residential) to M (Medium Density Residential). Staff
does not support this request.
The applicant has proposed to rezone the property from U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural
Density Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential). Staff does not support this
request.
The Multi-Family Residential use is permitted in the proposed R-3 (Medium Density
Residential) zoning district, but requires a Site Development Plan Review.
ANALYSIS
This is a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-68781) from R (Rural Density
Residential) to M (Medium Density Residential) and Rezoning (ZON-68782) from U
(Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on
approximately 2.49 acres located at 5097 Roberta Lane. The applicant has proposed to
develop the subject site into a two-story multi-family residential development containing
16 one-bedroom units and 24 two-bedroom units, which requires an associated Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-68784).
The subject site is located within Southwest Sector Plan area. The proposed M
(Medium Density Residential) general plan designation is compatible with the proposed
R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district, which will allow the proposed multi-
family residential development as a permitted land use. However, the proposed
changes to the subject sites general plan and zoning designation will allow a dwelling
unit density of 25.49, which is incompatible with the existing rural density single-family
residences in the area.
The proposed building is 33 feet in height measured to the top of the flat roof line, and
will cover approximately 26% of the 2.49 acre site. The submitted building elevations
indicate the building faades will have a light brown and dark brown stucco finish, with
tile roofing, which is incorporated along all sides of the building.
JB
The on-site parking areas are located along the eastern and southern perimeters of the
subject site. The site will provide 69 total parking spaces, including three handicapped
parking spaces, which complies with the 69 parking spaces required by Title 19.12.010
for a Multi-Family Residential development with 16 one-bedroom units and 24 two-
bedroom units. The submitted site plans indicates 20 of the 69 proposed parking spaces
(approximately 29%), will be designed as compact parking spaces. Per Title 19.08
minimum of seventy percent of the parking spaces shall be standard size and up to
thirty percent of the required on-site parking spaces may be designated as compact
parking spaces.
The trash enclosure is located in the southeastern corner of the site and is designed to
comply with Title 19.08 standards, which requires it to be screened, gated and covered.
The primary tree species being utilized are 24 box African Sumac, 24 box Desert
Willow, and Date Palm trees, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional
Plan Coalition Regional Plant List. In addition, the applicant has proposed to install a
six-foot tall wrought iron wall/fence at the required 10-foot building setback on Roberta
Lane and 15 feet from Apricot Lane; with existing screen walls located on the southern
and eastern perimeter of the property.
As the development is inconsistent with the surrounding single-family developments,

staff recommends denial of the associated General Plan Amendment, Rezoning and
Site Development Plan Review requests, with conditions.
FINDINGS (GPA-68781)
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following
conditions be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is

compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,
The proposed M (Medium Density Residential) General Plan designation will

allow a dwelling unit density of 25.49, which is inconsistent with the adjacent
rural density single-family residential land uses surrounding the subject site.
2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be

compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,
The applicant has proposed a Rezoning (ZON-68782) from U (Undeveloped) [R

(Rural Density Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on the subject
site, which is consistent with the proposed M (Medium Density Residential)
General Plan designation.
JB
3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and
The subject site is approximately 1,000 feet from Smoke Ranch Road and
Decatur Boulevard, which are both Primary Arterials and provide access to
transportation and recreational facilities to accommodate the proposed multi-
family use.
4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and

policies that include approved neighborhood plans.
All applicable plans and policies are met with the proposed amendment.

The proposed Rezoning from U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) to

R-3 (Medium Density Residential) is in conformance with the proposed M
(Medium Density Residential) designation under the Southwest Sector Plan of the
General Plan. However, staff is recommending denial of the proposed General
Plan Amendment (GPA-68781).
districts.
The purpose of the R-3 District is to provide for the development of a variety of
multi-family units such as duplexes, townhouses and medium density
apartments. The applicant has proposed to develop the site with a 40-unit Multi-
Family Residential development, which is incompatible with the surrounding
rural density single-family residential development.
The proposed R-3 (Medium Density Residential) is not an appropriate zoning

designation for the area, as it is incompatible with the surrounding rural density
single-family residential development.
JB

Primary site access is from Roberta Lane and Apricot Lane both are classified
as 60-foot Local Streets, which provide adequate capacity to serve the
proposed use.

The proposed 40-unit Multi-Family Residential development is incompatible with

the adjacent rural density single-family residential developments in the area. In
addition, the proposed 33-foot tall structures are contextually inappropriate with
other buildings in the area. However, staff is recommending denial of the
proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA-68781).
The proposed 40-unit Multi-Family Residential development is consistent with the

proposed M (Medium Density Residential) General Plan designation and complies
with all Title 19 development standards with sufficient landscaping.

Primary site access is from Roberta Lane and Apricot Lane both are classified as
60-foot Local Streets, which provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
The submitted site plan indicates the required 60-foot Minor Collector Street half
street improvements will be completed adjacent to the subject site.
City;
The project design and style are inappropriate for the subject location and will not
be harmonious with the rural density single-family residential in the surrounding
area.
JB

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not compatible
with the rural density single-family residential development in the area.
The proposed Multi-Family Residential development will be subject to inspections

in order to protect the public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

The City Council approved a request for a Petition of Annexation
(ANX-10579) of property located at the southeast corner of Roberta
04/05/06 Lane and Apricot Lane, containing approximately 2.5 acres. The
Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the
request.
The Planning Commission withdrew without prejudice a request for a
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-16849) for a proposed 11,590
square-foot Church/House of Worship and a Waiver of the perimeter
landscape buffering standard for 4.5 feet along the southern perimeter
where six feet is required located on the south side of Roberta Drive,
approximately 1280 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. Staff
12/07/06
recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission withdrew without prejudice a request for a
Special Use Permit (SUP-16850) for a proposed Church/House of
Worship located on the south side of Roberta Drive, approximately
1280 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of
the request.
The Planning Commission tabled a request for a General Plan
Amendment (GPA-22587) from R (Rural Density Residential) to ML
(Medium Low Density Residential) on 2.49 acres at the southeast
02/14/08
corner of Roberta Lane and Apricot Lane. Note: This application has
been amended to the L (Low Density Residential) general plan
designation. Staff recommended denial of the request.
JB

The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Rezoning (ZON-
23373) from U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) General
Plan Designation] to R-PD4 (Residential Planned Development - 4
Units per Acre) on 2.49 acres at the southeast corner of Roberta Lane
and Apricot Lane. Staff recommended denial of the request.
The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Variance (VAR-
23661) to allow an R-PD development to be 2.49 acres where five
acres is the minimum required on 2.49 acres at the southeast corner of
Roberta Lane and Apricot Lane. Staff recommended denial of the
request.
The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-23377) for a proposed 11-lot single-family
residential development at the southeast corner of Roberta Lane and
Apricot Lane. Staff recommended denial of the request.
The Planning Commission voted (4-0) to hold GPA-68781, ZON-68782
04/11/17 and SDR-68784 in abeyance to the May 9, 2017 Planning Commission
meeting at the request of the applicant.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold GPA-68781, ZON-68782
05/09/17 and SDR-68784 in abeyance to the June 13, 2017 Planning
Commission meeting at the request of the applicant.


A building permit (#93572) was issued for a wall/fence located at 5097
07/11/07
Roberta Lane. The permit has not been finalized
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over
the application materials and submittal requirements for a Site
01/12/17
Development Plan Review, General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
for a proposed 40-unit multi-family development.
JB
A neighborhood meeting was held at Doris Reed Elementary School at
2501 Winwood Street at 5:30pm to discuss the proposed General Plan
Amendment, Rezoning and Site Development Plan Review for a
proposed 40-unit multi-family residential development at 5097 Roberta
03/22/17 Lane, Assessors Parcel 138-13-801-002.
The meeting was attended by one staff member; there were twenty-
four (24) members of the public at the meeting which raised the
following concerns to the proposed development.
Issues
1. Concerns were raised about the proposed height of the
structures.
a. The applicant indicated the structures would be two
stories in height.
2. Concerns were raised about an increase in the volume of daily
traffic in the area.
3. Concerns were raised regarding the proposed density of the
development.
a. The applicant indicated that the proposed project is
providing 40 units, on-site parking that meets code
requirements and dense landscaping to screen the
development.
4. Very strong concerns were raised about changing the rural
characteristics of the neighborhood. Neighbors were adamant
about keeping the existing R (Rural Density Residential)
general plan designation of the property. Neighbors indicated
they had paid a premium to live in a rural neighborhood.
5. Concerns were raised regarding site security and increase
crime in the area.
6. Concerns were raised about if this development will accept
Section 8.
a. The applicant indicated this project is not intended to be
utilized as affordable housing, and that it intended to
attract high-end tenants.
7. Concerns were raised about this development lowering the
property values of the homes in the area.
8. Concerns were raised about the impact this development would
have to the occupancy rates of the existing schools in the area.
JB
9. Concerns were raised about smells from existing animals on the
rural properties and how they will affect the development.
10. Neighbors suggested an alternative site for the proposed
development on Smoke Ranch road and Michael Way.
Ultimately neighbors indicated they would not support any
development which does not align with the existing R (Rural Density
Residential) general plan designation of the property.
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine site visit and found the subject site to be a
well maintained undeveloped parcel of land free from trash and debris.
03/02/17
However, there was abandoned vehicle located on the south western
perimeter of the property.

Site Area
Net Acres 2.49

Property District
19.12 Designation
U(R) Undeveloped [R
Subject R (Rural Density
Undeveloped (Rural Density
Residential)]
R-PD6 (Residential
Single-Family R (Rural Density
North Planned Development
6 units per acre)
RN (Rural R-E (Rural Estates
Single-Family
South Neighborhood) Residential) Clark
Residential
Clark County County
RN (Rural R-E (Rural Estates
Single-Family
East Neighborhood) Residential) Clark
Residential
Clark County County
Single-Family RN (Rural R-E (Rural Estates
West Residential Neighborhood) Residential) Clark
Undeveloped Clark County County
JB

Trails N/A
Assessment)
Pursuant to 19.06.110, the following standards apply:

Min. Lot Size 6,500 SF 108,464 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
Corner 5 Feet 20 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
Screened,
Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or
Roof or Trellis Trellis
Not
Mech. Equipment Screened Indicated Not Indicated

U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural
Density Residential) 1 du/ac 1
General Plan Designation]
R-3 (Medium Density
25.49 du/ac * 63
Residential)
JB
Existing General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed

R (Rural Density
3.59 8
Residential)
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
M (Medium Density
25.49 du/ac 63
Residential)
* Maximum dwelling units per acre (DUA) is determined by the underlying General Plan
Designation and may not exceed the density permitted under said designation. The
applicant has proposed a to amend the General Plan Designation from R (Rural Density
Residential) to M (Medium Density Residential), which allows up to 25.49 DUA.

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 13 Trees 22 Trees Y
East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 18 Trees 20 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 63 Trees 84 Trees Y
17 Trees 17 Trees Y
spaces
Min. Zone Width
South 6 Feet 6 Feet Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Foot Y

Governing
Document
Apricot Lane Local Street Title 13 0 N
Roberta Lane Local Street Title 13 30 N
JB
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
16 (One-
Bedroom 1:1.25 20
Units)
24 (Two-
Bedroom 1:1.75 42
40 Unit
Units)
Multi-Family
Plus one
Residential
additional
Guest parking
7
Parking space for
every six
units
JB
GPA-68781

GPA-68781

GPA-68781
ML
ROW
LA CRESTA ST
MADRE MESA DR
SC
PF M
ROBERTA LN
CHARTO LN
SUBJECT BEVVIE DR
PROPERTY
TAPPI ST
PR-OS
MLA
N MICHA
SONNY HARRIS LN
TRETTER
E
W AY
L WAY
APRICOT LN
SMOKE RANC H RD
FROM R TO M
General Plan Amendment 1000' Buffer
RNP - Rural Neighborhood MLA - Medium - Low Attached GTC - Tourist Commercial PF-CC Public Facility
Preservation Clark County City Limits
LVMD - Las Vegas Medical
M - Medium
RE - Rural Estates District TC - Town Center
Not City
DR - Desert Rural H - High LI/R - Light Industrial / Research
RC - Resource Conservation
PCD - Planned Community Subject Property GIS maps are normally produced
only to meet the needs of the City.
R - Rural O - Office
Development C - Downtown - Com mercial Due to continuous development activity
this map is for reference only.
SC - Service Com mercial PR-OS - Park/Recreation/ Geographic Inform ation System
L - Low MXU - Downtown - Mixed Use Planning & Development Dept.
Open Space 702-229-6301
ML - Medium - Low GC - General Commercial TND - Tradional Neighborhood

PF - Public Facility Date: Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Development

AAA
A
7AA
AA7 7b
7
77b
77
A7
777777
bA7
AA7
b7A
bA7
bA7
77777
b
7b7
bA7 777777
AA
7777777
A7A

777A7777 7
7Ab7
77777
777
77 A7A7

777777
777777777777 77 7b
77777777777b77777 A7
7777777777777
7b
77777777
7b777A77 7 7 77b
777777 A7A
A77A7
77b77 7 @7
7
7
777
7b7
AA7
AA7

b A7
bA7
A7
7b
bA
AA
AAA7A
7A
AA77
77
77
A77
bA77
A77
b7b77777777
777
777
A7A77777
777 7A

bA77
AAA7
7AAb7
A77
7777

7777777b
b

7777

77777

77

777

7777

7

GPA-68781
7 7 7 7 7
AAb7A7
A A777 A7AA
77b777777b7
777
7Ab77
777
7Ab77
7 777A7
7
77A
Ab777 777
77
777777 77A
7
77A
A7 7 b 777777 77A 7
A77A7 77A 7 @
A7 77777777A7A b77A77b7
A7A7 77A
7 7 7
Ab777 Ab777 Ab777 7 7 A7Ab7 7
77
A77* A77* A77* A7 7
777
bAb7 7

AbA 777 AbA AbA

777777 7 777 7777 7AA7A77 b AbA7 7
77A7
AbA7Ab
bA bA bA
7
A7 7
A7 7 7AbA7A7 77b7A7
77b7b77777777777@77777
7 777@7
7AbA77AbA7Ab
7 7 7 77b7AA7

A7 A7 7bAA7A 77
7A777
777 A7
b A
77
A777
b7A 7bA7A77777A 7777
7777
7 77*7*7777Ab7 777
77 777
AbAbA7AA777A
7777bAb A7777
AbA7Ab7 777
AbA7Ab 7777 A77bA777 77777
7 A77A7
A7*7
bA7 7777
77
777
Abb7
777
7 7 7777b77AbA 777
77 77 7777
77AA 77AA7 Abb7A Abb7A 777777
A7
7 A7
A7

A

A
7
b

AA
b
A
A
7

7

b
7bAA
7AAb
bA

A77

77 77
7 777
77A 77A A

AbA7Ab7

AA
AA7 7

7A7

7
A

7A
bA
A
bA
bA7A7
bA
A
bA 7
A
AA

A
7b

AA

bb
A 7

A7
77
b
b

b
7

77

bA
A
b7
77
A7 b

77
77
A7
A77
A7A7
777
bA

A A

7b7 7A
7

b7b
bA
A7A

bA7 bA
7Ab
777
AA

A7

7
7

A7A

A7Ab
bA7

77
bb

7
A
bA
7b
A A77
77
b77A

bAb7A7A

bA
A
7
7A7 A
bA7A
A7
b b 7b
A
7A7 AA
A
A
b
AA
b
b

A

b A

A

Ab7

A
A
A7

AA7
A

b7

b A

A

7777

Ab

bA
A

bA

AA
A b
A
7
A
7 A
77
7A7
AA
AAA
A
AAA7
A
bA
7
AAA

A7bA
b7

b A7
A77 b

AA
A b b
b A A 7A A7A
A
AA7
77
7
b7b
A

A77

77 7
b
A
bA
A

A
A
A
AA
77AA 7A7 7A7 A

A
A7
bAAA
A A
A
7 A

b7
7
AA
AA
A
A
A7 A
7

777 7
A7 bA7 A
7AAb
7 A
A

Ab

A

AA
AAb
bAA7 bAA

77

AbA7 AbA

AA
AbA
b
7

AbA
AA
A
777 7b

b
AA
7
A

7
bAA77A
Ab
A

77 77 77 77

7
bA
bA
AA
7

A

7 A b
AbA

b
A b
A7

A
A
AA
A 7
A77
7
AbA

77

AAb7A7
A
A
A 7

A7

AAb7A7

7A7
7A

b A

A7A77
Ab7

777

A A A

A
b
A b A b
7
A b 7 A
777
7 A

A

b

A7A

A
A 7
AA

Ab
A
7
A

7A
A
A A A

7
A b A b
bA7 A

7AA
7
777

A
7

AA
77AA 7
7
AA
A
A

7
A
A
b
bAb7 bAb7 A
A7A

7A7
b
7 A
7
A

A
77

b7 7

b
A
b 7
77
7 b b7A 7
777 777
77AA
7
b
7
777
b
77
b
77
7
77
777
77777
7 7 7 7 b
7 bb7bA

77
777

bA
777
7
b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7

A
7
AbbA77A7AbA7A
777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 77

7
b
7
7A7A
77 77
b7 7
77
7
77
777

77
7bA7A
7
777 777 777 777 77
77777
77

7

b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b

77
77
77
77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7
77777bA 7 A7
777 b
7*b 7
77777
bA
777
A
777
AAb7A7
7 A7
AbA7Ab
AbA7Ab
7A
b7A7 77A
77
AbbA77A bA7 A7bA
7 7bA7A
A7 777

7b7b
A7 7777

7 7 7 7 7

A AAb7A7 A777 A7AA
77b777777b7

777
7Ab77

777
7Ab77
7 777A7
77A
7
Ab777 777
77
777777 77A
7
77A
A7 7 b 777777 77A
7
A77A7 77A 7 @
A77 77777777A7A b77A77b7
A7A7 77A
7 7 7
Ab777 Ab777 Ab777 7 7 A7Ab7 7
A77* A77* A77* A7 7
777
bAb7 7

AbA 777 AbA AbA

AbA7 7
77
777777 7 777 777 7AA7A77 b
77A7
bA bA bA
7
A7 7
A7 7 7AbA7A7 77b7A7
77b7b77777777777@77777
AbA7Ab
7 777@7
7AbA77AbA7Ab
7 7 77b7AA7
7bAA7A 77
7 A7 A7
7A777
A7 777 A7
b
77
A777
b7A
7bA7A77777A 7777
7777
7 777
77*7*7777Ab7
77 777
AbA7Ab7 777 AbAbA7AA777A 7777bAb A7777
AbA7Ab 7777 A77bA777 77777
7
A77A7
bA7 A7*7
7777

77
777
Abb7
777
7 7 7777b77AbA 777
77 77 7777
77AA 77AA7 Abb7A Abb7A 777777
A7
7 A7 A77b7 A7

A

A
7
b

AA
b
A
A
7

7

b
7bAA
7AAb
bA

A77

7 777 A

AbA7Ab
A

AA
AA7 7

A
7A7

A

7A
bA
A

bA
bA7A7
bA
A
bA 7
A
AA

A
7b
AA

bb
A 7

A7
b
b

b
7

77

bA
77
A

A
A7
b7 b

77

A77
77
A7A7 bA
77

A7

777 A7 A

7b7 7A
7

b7b
bA
A7A

bA7 bA
7Ab
AA

A7

7
777
7

A7A

A7Ab
bA7

77
bb

7
A
bA
7b
A77
77
b77A

bAb7A7A

bA
77 77
A
7
7A7 A
bA7A
A7
b b 7b
A
AA A
77A 77A A
b
AA
7A7
b
b

A

b A

A
A
A7

AA
A

b7

b A

A

Ab7

A
b
Ab

777

bA
A

bA

AA
A b
A
7
A
A
7A7

AA
AAA
A
AAA7
A
bA
7
7 AAA

77

A7bA
b7

b A7
A77 b

AA
A b b
A A 7A A7A
A
AA7
77
7
b7b
A

A77
7

77 7
b
A
bA
A

A
A
A
AA
7A7 7A7 A

A7
bAAA
A A
77AA
A
A
7 A
AA
AA
A
A
b7 A7 A
7

777 7
A bA7 A
7AAb
A
A

Ab

A

AA
7

AAb
7 bAA7

bAA

AbA

77
AbA7
AA
AbA
b
7
AbA
AA
A
7b
AA

777
A
7
A

7
bAA77A
Ab
A

7
bA
bA
AA
77 77 77 77
7

A
7

7 A b
AbA

b
A b
A7

A
A
AA
A 7
A77
7
AbA

A
A

77
A 7

AAb7A7

A7

AAb7A7
7A

b A

7A7
7A

A
A7A77
Ab7

777
A
A A A

A
b
A b A b
7
A b 7 A
7 A

A
777

A

A
A 7
AA

Ab
A
7
A

7A
A
A A A

A b A b
bA7 A

7
7

7AA
777 A
7

AA
7
7
AA
77AA A
A

7
A
A
b
bAb7 bAb7 A
A7A

7A7
b
A
7
A
7
A
77

A
b
A
b7
77
7 b
77AA b 7
b b7A 7
777 777
777
b7
77
b
7
77
77777
7 7 7 7 b
777
7 bb7bA

77
777

777
bA
7
b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b

A
7
AbbA77A7AbA7A
777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 77

777
b
7
b
77 77
77
7
77

7A7A
A7
77
7bA7A
7 777
7
777 777 777 777 77
77777
77

b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b
77
77
77
7
77

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7
77777bA 7 A7
777 b
7*b 7
77777
bA
7777
A
777
AAb7A7
7 A7
AbA7Ab
AbA7Ab
7A
b7A7 77A
77
AbbA77A bA7 A7bA
7 7bA7A
A7 777

7b7b
A7 777

7 7 7 7 7
77bA
77bA7 7A7

AAb77A
77 77 777A7
b7777
7
777
7
7
7 @
777
777
b77A77b7
b7 b7
777 7777 AAb77A
b777
77 77
77 77

AAb77A
7777 777A b777
7 7777
7 777 A777
7777
777
777
A7777
77bA 77777
77bA A77A7
7777
777
777
777
AAb7A7 7777
b7777 777777
77 77
777
777
b7 b7
777 777
77 77
77 77
7777 777
b7 7777
b7 777
b7 77bA
77bA

77 77
7A7
A7A77
7AA
777
777
b7 b7
777 777
77 77
77 77
7777 777A
7 7777
7 777
7
7A
77bA
77bA

77 77
7 7 7 7

7 7
777
777
b7 b7
777 777
A7
7A
b7A7 77A
77 77 77
bA7 A7bA
77 77 7 7bA7A

7777 7777
A7 7777
A7 7777


7 7 7 7 7
7A7

AAb77A
b7777 777A7
7
777
7
7
7 @
b77A77b7
AAb77A
b777
AAb77A
b777
A777
7777
777
777
A7777
77777
A77A7
7777
777
777
AAb7A7 777
b7777 7777
777777
b
7A7
A7A77
b7 b7
7AA
777 777
77A
77
77
77A77 7
77
77
77 77
77 77
A
b777 b77A
7
7 7777
7 777
7
7A
7 7 7 7

7 7
b7 b7
777 777
77A
A 77A
77
77
7
7
A7
7A
b7A7 77A
77
77
77
77 77 bA7 A7bA
7 7bA7A
77 77

b777 b77
A7 7777
A7 7777

7 7 7 7 7
A7Ab7
* * bA7A7Ab7
* * Ab Ab
A A 7 A77 A7 7
7
A77 A7 77
*7A7A7
777A7

7 7
7 7 77bA7A777A
7 77A7777 Abb 777
7 A77bAbA
Ab b7 b7 Ab
A
b7 b7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7 @
A A b77A77b7
A A 7 7 bA777 bA777
7 7
A AA AA A
AAA AA A 7 7 A 7 A
7 7 7
7 7 7 7
A
A A7 7 A7 7
A A A A
A b b A A
A 7 7 b b A 7 A A7 7 A7A7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 77 7 7
A7A7 7 A7 7
b77 7 b77 7
7 7 b77 7
777
777
A AA7 7 7 7
A A
A b b
b b A A A A 77 7 AA7 7
A 7 7 7 7
777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777
A A A A777
A7 7 A7 7 7777
7 7 7 7 7
Ab7 7 77 7 777
A AA AA A 777
A7AA AA7A 7 7 7 7 7Ab7 7 Ab7 7 A7777
77 7
777
77 7
77777
777
A A 77 7 77 7
7 77 A77A7
A
b7 7 7Ab7 7 7777
7
777

7 7 77 7 77 7 777
7
7 7 777
b7 Ab 777 7 b7 7
A Ab b7 7777
77
b7 b7 A 7 7 7 7
77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 777777
7 7 7
777 7777 777 777 7
7777 7777 77
* *
AA7*7 AA7*7
* * Ab Ab 77b7A7 77A77A7
A77 A7
A A77 A7 A 7 7
7 7
*7*7 7* *7*7 7*
b7*7 7* b7*7 7*
7777 777 A7AA7 7* A7AA7 7*

7 7
77b77A777
b7 777 bA7777AA
7777A777A7
b7 777
7 A
A7 7
A7A7 7
b77 7
b
AA7 7
7 7
77 7
A7 7
77
7A7 7
* * * *
A A Ab Ab A7 7
7 77 77 77 7 77 7 7
7A7
77 7
A7A77
77 7
77
7777 777 b7 7

7AA

7 777 7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7
A A Ab b7 Ab
b7 b7 b7
777
7 7 7 7 7 bA7777AA
7 7 7

A A
A A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
AAA
AA AA7 A
AA7A 7 7 A7 7
77 77 7
7 77 7
A7A7 7
A 7 A A
A
A b7 A A 7 b77 7
b7 7 A
7 7 7 7
7 7
777
b b A b7 b77 7
A A b b A
7 7 7 7 7 b7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7
777 777 777 77 AA7 7

77 7
777
777

7
AA77A
A7 7
b

A A A 7777 7777 777 777 77
7 b b 7 7 b A7 7
7 7 7 b
A 7 7 A 7
A 7 77 7
A b7 A
b7 A A
7 7 A b7 A
7 7 7 7 7A7 7
7 7 7
777
77 7
A AA A AAA b7
AA A7 AA b7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7
77 7

777 7
A A A A

7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7

7 7 7
7 Ab Ab
A 7
b7 A 7
7
7 7
777
7 7 b7 b7 b7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7777 777 777
7 7
* * *
*
A 77 77 A 77 7 Ab
Ab
7 7 7
7
A7
7777 777 7A7
b7A7 77A
77
bA7 A7bA
7 7bA7A
7777A7777 77b77A777
A7 7777
A7 777


7 7 7 7 7

7 7A7 A

b7 77 7
777A7
b7 b7AA7 7 7
777
b7 AA77 7
b7 b77 7 7
7
b7 b77 7 7 @
b7 77 7 b77A77b7
b7 A7 7
b7 A7 7
b7 AA77 7
b7 77 7
b7 77 7
b7 77 7
777 7
A777
7777
777
777
A7777
77777
A77A7
7777
777
777
777
7777
777777
b
7A7
A7A77
7AA
7777 7777 777
b
**b7 **b7 AA
b b b b
7 77 7
7
777
AA7
7
b77A
b
b 7
7
A
777
b

7
b
7777 7777 7777 7777 777
777
77 7777
*

b
A 7
b

7

777
b AA7
7 b
77 7 7 7 7

7 7
A7 7777 777
A7
7A
b7A7 77A
77
bA7 A7bA
b77A 7 7bA7A
A 777


GPA-68781 [PRJ-68576] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-68782 AND SDR-68784 - APPLICANT:
BRITIM CONSTRUCTION - OWNER: MATLOCK HOLDINGS IV, LLC
5097 ROBERTA LANE
03/02/17
5097 ROBERTA LANE
03/02/17
5097 ROBERTA LANE
03/02/17
7 7 7
777777777777
7 7 7777777777
7 7 b777
7 7 777
7 7 777
7 7
7 7 A7777
7 7 7 77'7A7b
7 A7

7A7
7 7 77777A7A7777

7 7 777
77A7b777777'777b777
7777'77777A7A77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 b7

77A
7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777
7
77777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77777777777

77777777777777777777777777777777777777 7 7 7 7777777777777777

77777777777777777777777777"7 7 7 7 7 7777777777777777

7777777777777

GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 - REVISED

77
77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 b7 7 7 7
777777777777
7777777777777
7 7 7 7 b7 '7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
'77
777'77777777'777
A77777777777777
777777777777777
777777E7777777
'777777
77
77
7
777777777777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7 7 7 777777777777777777

77777777777 7777777777777"7 7 7 7 7 7777777777777777

777777777777777
7
GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 - REVISED

GPA-68781, ZON-68782 and SDR-68784
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS / COMMENTS
FROM: CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION
APPLICATION NUMBERS: GPA-68781 / ZON-68782 / SDR-68784
PROJECT: BROOKS APARTMENTS
LOCATION: 138-13-801-002
MEETING DATES: APRIL 11, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION & MAY

17, 2017, CITY COUNCIL
COMMENTS:
Federal Aviation Regulations (Title 14, Part 77) require that the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) be notified before the construction or alteration of any building or structure greater than
200 feet in height ( 77.13(a)(1)) or that will exceed a slope of 100:1 for a distance of 20,000
feet from the nearest point of any airport runway greater than 3,200 feet in length ( 77.13
(a)(2)(i)). Such notification allows the FAA to determine what impact, if any, the proposed
development will have upon navigable airspace, and allows the FAA to determine whether the
development requires obstruction marking or lighting.
The proposed development will exceed the 100:1 notice requirement for McCarran International
Airport (LAS). Therefore, as required by 14 CFR Part 77, the FAA must be notified of the
proposed construction or alteration. The CCDOA requests that the City of Las Vegas impose
the conditions listed below for the project:
Applicant is required to file a valid FAA Form 7460-1, "Notice of Proposed Construction
or Alteration" with the FAA, in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77, or submit to the Clark
County Director of Aviation a Property Owners Shielding Determination Statement
and request written concurrence from the Clark County Department of Aviation;
No Building Permit or other construction permit shall be issued for any structure greater
than 35 feet above the surface of land that, based upon the FAAs 7460 airspace
determination (the outcome of filing the FAA Form 7460-1), would (a) constitute a
hazard to air navigation, (b) would result in an increase to minimum flight altitudes
during any phase of flight (unless approved by the Department of Aviation), or (c) would
otherwise be determined to pose a significant adverse impact on airport or aircraft
operations.
Applicant is advised that FAAs airspace determinations are dependent on petitions by
any interested party and the height that will not present a hazard as determined by the
FAA may change based on these comments.
Applicant is advised that the FAAs airspace determinations include expiration dates and
that the separate airspace determinations will be needed for construction cranes or other
temporary equipment.
March 22,201,7
To Matlock Holdings IV, LLC:
We the people located neat 5097 Roberta Lane and signatures below are petitioning the buildinqlCEVED
of the MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HOMES on2.49 acres.
hilAY {i Z0il
Having these homes built on the2.49acres would cause a huge burden on the neighborhood
trafflic being one of them. Robelta Lane cannot handle the traffic. There ate no street lights on City of l-as Vegas
of Planning
the south side nor are there sidewalks. Also, \rye ae extremely worried about the cdme they wiePt
br.ing to our neighborhood. It would take our neighborhood from a quiet one to a vely hectic one.
Most of us ha'e been here over 2A years and do not appreciate even the thought of having this
'We
rnany homes built in our quiet rural area. want to keep our neighborhood quiet. Plus we want
to keep the crime to a minimum. This would also put a burden on the school. They are close to
capacity if not already.
Imagine your home invaded with a project like this. I know you would be opposed to it. Please
do not impose your financial gain on us. Please leconsider something else!
Thank you!!!!!!!!
Name Address
\
+7
{c-C.02
A J
'4)
0VelL
outu[r111 rtem l1 q
xil)
p
<_ t-/
o
p
w no-
J >^J/Z Llz/x'z
ECEVED
I zon
CTty of Las Vegas
of Planning
11- ?
( tb)
REEIVED
AY I znr
To the Las Vegas City Council: i.:ity of Las Vegas
ept.of planning
we are writing to voice our strong opposition to the request
from Matlock Holdings lv to amend
the General Plan for 5097 Roberta Lane (APN 138-L3-g01-002)from:
' to: M (Medium Density Residential) (GPA-6g7BL, zoN-6g7g2') in
R(Rural Density Residential)
order to permit Matlock
Holdings lV to devetop a 40-unit apartment comprex
{sDR-6s7g4).
5097 Roberta Lane is a vacant lot located immediately
between and adjacent to two single-story,
rural residential, single-family residences on +.5 acre lots.
The proposed zoning change is
inconsistent with the zoning of the immediately
adjacent homes as well as the surrounding
homes in our community. The proposed zoning
change would effectively place a high-density,
multi-family development in the absolute center of a low-density,
single-family residential
neighborhood.
we, the undersigned community members residing near 50g7 Roberta

Dr. wish to have our
voices heard: "we are opposed to the zoning change
being considered April 11, 2oL7 under (GpA-
6878L, ZON-687821."
Name: Address: Signature:

1. 5c {
2.
3.
4. r ....)
5.
6. di-( :li fr:
7.
8. U t2
u /
9. r
L0.
LL.
L2.
13.
L4.
15.
t6.
17.
18.
19.
20.
2L.
22.
I' P
tJ-tq
CnJ
l{FCF;\/:.}}
;Tliis:::,sl:
To the Las Vegas City Council:
we are'writing to voice our strong opposition

to the request from Matlock Holdings lv to amend
the General Plan for 5097 Roberta Lane
{APN L38-13-801-002) from: R(Rural Density Residential)
to: M (Medium Density Residential) (GPA-68781,
zoN-6 g7g2l in order to permit Matlock
Holdings lV to deverop a 40-unit apartment
comprex (sDR-6g7g4).
5097 Roberta Lane is a vacant lot located
immediately between and adjacent to two single-story,
rural residential, single-family residences on +.5
acre lots. he proposed zoning change is
inconsistent with the zoning of the immediately
adjacent homes as well as the surrounding
homes in our community. The proposed
zoning change would effectively place a high-density,
multi-family development in the absolute center
of a low-densit single-family residential
neighborhood.
we' the undersigned community members residing near

5097 Roberta Dr. wish to have our
voices heard: "we are opposed to the zoning
change being considered April 1L, 2oL7 under (GpA-
6878L,ZAN-68782],."
Name: Address: Signature:

-lo
3.
ri/ 4:--
4. Qoo.l
5.
6. {-i A,
7.
8.
9.
I.oc
L6.
L7.
18.
20.
21..
22. ha
xl4
I u Lile Lds vegas LtIy Louncll:
We are writing to voice our strong opposition to the request from Matlock Holdings lV to amend
the General Plan for 5097 Roberta Lane (APN 138-13-801-002)from: R(Rural Density Residential)
to: M (Medium Density Residential) (GPA-68781, ZON-687821 in order to permit Matlock
Holdings lv to develop a 40-unit apartment complex {sDR-6g7g4).
5097 Roberta Lane is a vacant lot located mmediately between and adiacent to two single-stor
rural residental, single-family residences on +.5 acre lots. The proposed zoning change is
inconsistent with the zoning of the immediately adjacent homes as well as the surrounding
homes in our community. The proposed zoning change would effectively place a high-density,
multi-family development in the absolute center of a low-density, single-family residential
neighborhood.
We, the undersigned community members residing near 5097 Roberta Dr. wish to have our
voices heard: "We are opposed to the zoning change being considered April 11, 2017 under (Fffip-ff_.f,
6878L,ZON-687821."
[/|A\' I 21
Name: Address: Signature: ty of l-as Vegas
- e Plannin g
t /.f f <q a
2.
3.
4.
5.
tbh"
6.
7. E,eFlE,tr Fzt D
.Z
8. {
9. C
10.
LT.
L2,
13.
t4.
L5.
L6.
L7.
18.
L9.
20.
2L.
22.
t' g
P
\*re
Residents Aganst the proposed zoning change Q-r1t
Apartment complex with p-rt itg t"i- to permit the building of a two story 40 unr--E <s'c{
rcar at s0g7 Roberra Lane \><
NAME
"i.ir""
ADDRESS hemr YRS PHoNE S ic5na*ure
/ -.t-J
r?- lr t e,f X 3
{- t1 rN -7a>4v -63
_
3 l
f
f,
E
6 r - 5?r?q ,
7 at3 b*c 7o) -S - t '{ 6
8.
-6
9
(r1
7 - 8'rg7
10. ti Y *6r - VLl
11 "h ( 7
L2-
I
v t,
l.4.
15.

16.

L7. RCF"
18. $
hriA) 2i.i,
19.
a CitY of Las vege+.
20. pt of Plannin
Resident s Against c_
Apartmen t conrplex the pro posed zoni ng
with parking for cha lge to perraia --rZ-.
\
N.ME 60 veh rcles al._lyitding of a two sror y
l_ocated at 40 unat --- r-I
t4 ADDRESS
5097 Roberta Lane \><
knlrr YRS JHfiT-
SrOt*tlrg-
6 a 5l) "'.1
\ir
3
f a
q.
5- ,()
H
6 &i/r:
n /6
7-
I
p/
q )e*n
L
10.
11. X I
L2.
13.
L4 .i.itA), S 7i,i ;
1s
City ot La Vg:
16.
17-
I8.
19.
r0"
.t
]

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - ZON-68782 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-68781 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: BRITIM CONSTRUCTION - OWNER: MATLOCK HOLDINGS IV, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [R (RURAL
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION] TO: R-3 (MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.49 acres at 5097 Roberta Lane (APN 138-13-801-002), Ward 5
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-68782 and SDR-68784 [PRJ-68576]
paper use, backup
ZON-68782

ZON-68782

ZON-68782
R-PD20
R-PD5
MADRE MESA DR R-PD12
C-1
C-V R-3
ROBERTA LN
CHARTO LN
U(R)
U(M)
SUBJECT BEVVIE DR
PROPERTY
TAPPI ST
R-PD6
N MICHA
SONNY HARRIS LN
TRETTER
E
W AY
L WAY
APRICOT LN
R-D R-E
SMOKE RANC H RD
Zoning FROM U(R) TO R-3

Undeveloped Density Residential 1000' Buffer
R-A - Ranch Acres
Residential City Limits
R-E - Residential Estates R-4 - High Density
R-D - Single-Family Residential C-D - Designed Commercial P-C - Planned Community Not City
Residential-Restricted R-5 - Apartment
R-PD - Residential C-1 - Limited Commercial T-D - Traditional Development Subject Property GIS maps are normally produced
Planned Development Home Residence
Due to continuous development activity
Planning & Development Dept.
Manufactured Home Park Park
702-229-6301
Compact-Lot P-R - Professional Offices Date: Wednesday, March 01, 2017
and Parking
7

777A7
A777A
777
77;77
7777
7777;7
7777
b77;7b7
7777
7777
7777
77A
77777?
7777A7?
77
777
777
b777b
b777b
b777b
b77b7
77
b77b
b7777?
b777b
777
b777b
b7b77777777
7777
7777

b
7777777b

7777

77777

77

777

77A77
A
ZON-68782

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-68784 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-
68781 AND ZON-68782 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BRITIM CONSTRUCTION -
OWNER: MATLOCK HOLDINGS IV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 40-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT on 2.49 acres at 5097 Roberta Lane (APN 138-13-801-002), U (Undeveloped)
Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] [PROPOSED: R-3 (Medium
Density Residential)], Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68576]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, subject to conditions:
paper use, backup
SDR-68784

SDR-68784


SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - VAR-67949 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
SAMARITAN HOUSE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW SIX
PARKING SPACES WHERE 11 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.19 acres at the northeast
corner of Adams Avenue and 4th Street (APN 139-27-603-014), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5


RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:
1. Abeyance Request Letter - VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
2. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
3. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
4. Supporting Documentation - VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
5. Photo(s) - VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
6. Justification Letter - VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
7. Support Postcards for VAR-67949 and VAR-69804 [PRJ-67708]
May 30 2017
VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950

VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SAMARITAN HOUSE, INC.
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
VAR-67949
conditions:
VAR-69804 VAR-67949
conditions:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-67949
SDR-67950
conditions: VAR-69804
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 47 - VAR-67949 and VAR-69804

47 - SDR-67950
PROTESTS 0 - VAR-67949 and VAR-69804

0 - SDR-67950
APPROVALS 2 - VAR-67949 and VAR-69804

2 - SDR-67950
SS
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-

69804) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-67950) shall be required, if
approved.
2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Rezoning (Z-0020-02).
Planning

approved.
2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Rezoning (Z-0020-02).
SS
Conditions Page Two
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variances (VAR-

67949 and VAR-69804) shall be required, if approved.
3. All development shall be in conformance with the site and landscape plan, date
stamped 04/17/17 and building elevations, date stamped 03/27/17, except as
amended by conditions herein.

SS

Public Works
9. Unless otherwise modified by VAR-69804, construct full half-street improvements

on Fourth Street and Adams Avenue concurrent with development of this site. In
accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56, remove all substandard offsite
improvements, if any, and replace with new improvements meeting Current City
Standards concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged
or removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its
original width concurrent with development of this site.
10. Prior to the issuance of any permits, grant a pedestrian access easement for all
sidewalk located outside of the public right-of-way.
permits or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct a 3,060 square-foot, single-story building at the

northeast corner of Adams Avenue and 4th Street to house meetings and activities in
conjunction with an existing alcoholic rehabilitation center (Samaritan House) located
at 1001 North 4th Street.
ISSUES
The site is zoned C-V (Civic), which allows certain development standards to be
approved through a Site Development Plan Review if compatible with adjacent
properties. No waivers or exceptions are therefore required.
A Variance is required to permit six parking spaces where 11 spaces are required.
Staff recommends denial.
A Variance is required to permit the backing of any motor vehicle onto a public street
from the parking area along Adams Avenue as proposed. Staff recommends denial.
Half-street improvements on Adams Avenue and 4th Street are required except as
modified by VAR-69804.
ANALYSIS
Development of the site is subject to Title 19.10 standards for developments within the
C-V (Civic) zoning district. The C-V District may provide for any public or quasi-public
use operated or controlled by any recognized religious, fraternal, veteran, civic or
service organization and is consistent with the Public Facilities category of the General
Plan. The proposed development on this site would be operated by the same entity that
operates the residential rehabilitation facility (termed an alcohol rehabilitation center
when first approved in 1967) across the street at 1001 North 4th Street. When both
sites were rezoned to C-V in 2002, the use was termed a Special Care Facility.
Neither term is used by the current version of Title 19. The proposed building would be
used as a gathering place for group meetings and special activities, characteristics that
are similar to an office use.
Through adoption of the Downtown North Land Use Plan, the General Plan designation
of the site was amended from PF (Public Facilities) to M (Medium Density Residential).
As the zoning of the property remains C-V and the use is closely affiliated with the
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
existing residential rehabilitation facility at 1001 North 4th Street, the proposed
development is compatible with surrounding land uses and therefore appropriate at this
location. The City, at its discretion, may opt to amend the General Plan designation to
PF at a future date in order to keep the zoning and General Plan designations
consistent.
Per Title 19.10, the minimum development standards for property in the C-V District
shall be established by the City Council in connection with the approval of a rezoning
application or in connection with the approval of a site development plan. Additional
standards relating to the height, perimeter and parking lot design and landscaping are
not applicable to this site, as it is not located adjacent to properties zoned for single-
family use. Due to the narrow width of the lot, the building is configured such that
parking must be reduced (by 45 percent from the minimum Title 19 requirement) and
located along the frontages, with three parking spaces configured to allow vehicles to
back onto Adams Avenue. Offsite improvements, including standard sidewalks, curbs
and gutters, must also be modified to allow for this configuration. The Department of
Public Works has no objection to vehicles backing out into the public right-of-way in this
situation, with the understanding that the majority of persons using the proposed
building on this site will be walking from the residential rehabilitation facility across the
street at 1001 North 4th Street. In addition, there are similar conditions in the area
where sidewalks, curbs and gutters are lacking; therefore, the Department of Public
Works also supports the proposed modification to offsite improvements, provided the
variance to allow vehicles to back out into the right-of-way (VAR-69804) is approved.
However, as the design of the building creates the necessity for reducing the number of
parking spaces and locating three of these spaces such that vehicles must back out into
the right-of-way, staff cannot support the request for both variances.
Half-street improvements are required on 4th Street and Adams Avenue adjacent to the
site. There are currently no sidewalks along the east side of 4th Street or the north side
of Adams Avenue. As part of this plan, a sidewalk is proposed at the corner of Adams
Avenue and 4th Street, with tie-ins to future sidewalks north and east of the property. In
lieu of a sidewalk along 4th Street, which is not practical given the onsite parallel
parking configuration, a pedestrian walkway is provided onsite that connects to an
accessible ramp at the corner. In a similar way, a walkway is provided behind the three
parking spaces on Adams Avenue. Pedestrian access easement(s) must be granted for
public use of these walkways.
The proposed building would consist of a painted corrugated metal exterior with a
sloped corrugated metal roof. The base of the west and south elevations would include
simulated stone veneer and glass doorways. The primary entry from 4th Street would
be sheltered by a sloped canopy. These materials are compatible with other
development in this area of the city.
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
Landscaping will be provided on the site, mostly on the interior adjacent to the building.
One 24-inch box Chilean Mesquite tree is provided at the northwest corner of the site
for screening of mechanical equipment, and shrubs are located around the tree, in front
of the building and at the corner. The materials provided are appropriate for the site.
The use is appropriate for this site. However, the site cannot accommodate a building
of the size proposed, along with the required number of onsite parking spaces. A
smaller building constructed to the frontages would allow for the provision of onsite
spaces behind the building without forcing vehicles to back out onto a public right-of-
way. Staff therefore recommends denial of the two variances and the Site Development
Plan Review, subject to conditions. If denied, permits for development of the site as
proposed cannot be issued.
order to:


No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the

applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a building that is too large
for the site to accommodate the required parking for the proposed use. Reducing the
size of the building and altering the site design would allow conformance to the Title 19
requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and
it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
order to:



applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing parking spaces that force
vehicles to back out into Adams Avenue. Reconfiguring the site with a smaller building
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

The use is appropriate for this site. However, the site cannot accommodate a
building of the size proposed, along with the required number of onsite parking
spaces.
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
The configuration of the building and parking lot requires variances to permit fewer
parking spaces than required and to allow vehicles to back out into public right-of-
way. The development otherwise is consistent with development in the C-V
zoning district.

Primary access to the site is from Adams Avenue, a Minor Street. Secondary
access is provided from 4th Street by way of three parallel parking spaces. No
onsite circulation is proposed. Refuse will be picked up from a trash enclosure
located along the 4th Street frontage.
City;
Building materials consist of corrugated metal roofing and siding, stone veneer
base and aluminum and glass storefront features. These materials are
compatible with surrounding development. Landscaping consists of one Chilean
Mesquite tree and a variety of five gallon drought-tolerant shrubs labeled as
bulletproof (low maintenance) by the Southern Nevada Regional Planning
Coalition Regional Plant List.

The building elevations presented create an aesthetically pleasing environment

and are harmonious and compatible with area development.
Site Development is subject to permit review and inspection for protection of the
health, safety and general welfare of the public.
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]

The Board of City Commissioners approved a Special Use Permit (U-
07/25/68 0025-68) for an alcohol rehabilitation center for 20 persons in the R-3
zoning district at 1001 North 4th Street. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0005-
02) from H (High Density Residential) and GC (General Commercial)
to PF (Public Facilities) on 0.55 acres on the west and east sides of
4th Street, approximately 400 feet north of Washington Avenue. The
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0020-02) from R-3 (Medium
Density Residential) to C-V (Civic) on 0.55 acres on the west and east
sides of 4th Street, approximately 400 feet north of Washington
06/05/02
Avenue. The maximum number of beds allowed in the existing
Special Care Facility was 43. The Planning Commission and staff
Review and reduction of onsite landscaping [Z-0020-02(1)] for a
proposed parking lot on 0.55 acres on the west and east sides of 4th
Street, approximately 400 feet north of Washington Avenue. The
approval expired 06/05/04.
The Planning Commission approved a Review of Condition [Z-0020-
02(3)] of an approved Rezoning (Z-0020-02) to delete Condition
Number 5, which required the construction of half street improvements
10/04/02
on Adams Avenue and 4th Street on 0.55 acres adjacent to the east
and west sides of Fourth Street, approximately 400 feet north of
Washington Avenue. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-2249) to
adopt the Downtown North Land Use Plan on 514 acres generally
located south of Owens Avenue, east of Interstate 15, north of
Interstate 15 and west of Bruce Street, Sagman Street and 9th Street.
05/21/03
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. As part
of this request, the General Plan designation of the subject property
was amended from PF (Public Facilities) to M (Medium Density
Residential).
Code Enforcement opened a Case (43590) for a complaint about
06/20/06 cabinets and junk in the front of the property at 1002 North 4th Street.
The Case was resolved 07/31/06.
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-15764) for a proposed parking lot on 0.19 acres at
09/21/06
1002 North 4th Street. Staff recommended approval. The approval
expired 09/21/08.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-29886)
to amend the Downtown North Land Use Plan. The land use
11/19/08
designation of the subject site was not affected by the amendment.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold VAR-67949 and SDR-
05/09/17 67950 [PRJ-67708] in abeyance to the June 13, 2017 Planning
Commission meeting.


A building permit (#01009512) was issued for a 3-foot to 9-foot
05/30/01 engineered block wall at 1002 North 4th Street. A final inspection was
completed 09/24/01.
A pre-application meeting was held to discuss submittal requirements
for a Site Development Plan Review application for a proposed
building on a vacant site. Due to size of the lot, the applicant claimed
11/10/16 that the building could not be placed at the front setback and parking
could not be located at the side or rear of the building. Variances
would therefore be required for this standard and to allow vehicles to
back into a public street.
Field Check
The site is currently vacant, unimproved and cleared of weeds and
debris. Existing screening and retaining walls are located along the
east and north perimeter of the property. Above-ground power lines
03/30/17
run along the south and west perimeters of the site. Public Works
commented that half-street improvements will be required on Adams
Avenue.
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]

Site Area
Net Acres 0.19

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject M (Medium Density
Undeveloped C-V (Civic)
Manufactured
Home (Qualifying R-MHP (Residential
M (Medium Density
North for treatment as Mobile/Manufactured
Residential)
Single Family Home Park)
Dwelling)
Hotel, Motel or GC (General C-2 (General
South
Motel Suites Commercial) Commercial)
East Outdoor Storage
Social Service M (Medium Density
West C-V (Civic)
Provider Residential)

Downtown North Plan Y
C-V (Civic) District Y
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area (Expansion Area 1) Y
N/A
Assessment)
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
Pursuant to Title 19.10, development standards for properties zoned C-V are
determined and evaluated through a Site Development Plan Review. The
following standards are proposed:
Standard Provided
Min. Lot Size 8,276 SF
Min. Lot Width 65 Feet
Min. Setbacks
Front 24 Feet
Side 6 Feet
Corner 23 Feet
Rear 6 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage 37 %
Max. Building Height 17 Feet
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened
Pursuant to Title 19.10, landscaping standards are not automatically applicable to the
subject property. However, the following the following standards apply:
Existing 3-9
retaining wall on
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential north perimeter Y
(5.5 on property
side)
Min. Zone Width:
North N/A 0 feet N/A
South N/A 0 feet N/A
East N/A 0 feet N/A
West N/A 0 feet N/A

Governing
Document
Adams Avenue Minor Street Title 13.12 47 N/A
4th Street Minor Street Title 13.12 49 N/A
SS
VAR-67949 and SDR-67950 [PRJ-67708]
Pursuant to Title 19.12 and Title 19.18, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Units Ratio Regular Regular
capped capped
1 space
Office, Other
3,060 SF per 300 11
Than Listed
SF GFA
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 11 6 N
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 10 1 5 1 N
Deviation from Title 19 45% N
SS
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
b 7 7 VAR-67949 A
777 77
77A 7 7777
77
77 A 77 7
77777' 777 777 777b 7b 7
7b 777 77777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
7 7
77777 777b 7b 777b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 77 77777 777
777 777
b 7
777 7 7
7
77 77
7 7777 A 7 7b
777777b 777 A7

7777
A 7 7

7A 77 7
7 7
A 7 7 A
A b A 77 7
A 7 77 7 7 7 7
7A 7 77b 7 4
7 7 7
A 777 7 77 77 7777 7
777 7 77
b 77 7 7A 7
7A 7 7
A 7
7 7
77
7 77 7 b
A 77 7 7 7
7
b 777 77 777 7 777
7A
A b A 7 b
A 7 77
b 7 77
7A
A b 77 7 7777 77
A 77777777 7 7 7
b 77 7 777b 7 77 7
7A
7777 777777 7 7 77 777777777 7' 7777777b7777
77 777777 777 77 777777777777 77 77
77777777777777 7777 77 '77 77777 77
7 7 7 A 7 7
A777 77777 777
7 7 7 7 7
77 777 7
4
b 7 VAR-67949
7
77 77
7
7 77 77 77 7 7 7
7
777777b 7777 77 777 7 77
7
777 77
77777 7
A7
7777
77 7777
A 7 7
7A 7 7 77

VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950 - REVISED


VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950

VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950

VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950

7b

7 7 7
77 77777
7777 7 7 A 7 7
7777
7 777 77

7777
777777
7777
777A 7
777
777 7 b 7 7 777 7
7 777
77777

77777
7 77 77
7 7 + 7 7 7 7
7 7b
7 A 7 7 b 7 7 b 7
VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950

7

7
VAR-67949, VAR-69804 and SDR-67950

VAR-67949 [PRJ-67708] - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-69804 AND SDR-67950 - APPLICANT/OWNER:
SAMARITAN HOUSE, INC.
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ADAMS AVENUE AND 4TH STREET
03/30/2017
03/30/2017
03/30/2017
7 7 7 b 7b
7 77 77 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 777 7 7
7 77 7 7 7 7 2 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
2 7 7 7A 7A 7 7 7 7 777 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 77 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7777 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 77
b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 77 7 7 7 7 2 7 7 7 7 7b
7777
7 7

{lity nfl"as ?egas PFSfli
Ilepn*ment of Pla*ning rnsT ..ss ir|"
U S. Pdo
I)eve!*pment S*rvice* ('enter PI
,i3. N$lb Ranciu Drive, 3td !-lxr {-! V94s. ltU
Las Y*gas N*vad !19106 .&flivilr Prmit *0. 16
*eturn liervic* Itequ*led !&i', {i;t il?j

Ofci*l N*tir"'e of ll*llit Htaring
rTy n ,;s i1;:;y:
*ept oi l'*{r.:u
\ rttl
ity Hall
11 ycu wi:tr t* file y*ur flr$lelt {'}r 5llFpff {ir this rr{q.}:st, cfieck the
aprropri*te bnn belor nad rtlunr this cani irr lo cnr,*irr* rvitb p**tagc trt the aso: VAF-6I49' vR 6984
$epa*rnent r:f Plntr*ing a{ thc odtlresr lisl*d :trtvc. fg this xide r:f tlris canl t* r 39276030?t'
{?{}?i 4l-?49 r:r nrke yd}ur e{}$insn[e tt 'rr rw. la,r *Sist*trilll,grrv. Lf 1'ou WTC* IN
p fi scl4 94?38
wouttt like t colacl your Co*ncil R*prr:srnl;rlivt:" plrn\* r:illl i?{}?) 2:9-d{}.1
Ls rdcs Nv 8g',ts3-4?3
I {}PT{ }Slt
m:ril'iil this ltt'q**rt
PteFu.s ayailable blanh space on canJ lirl r ottl r()nllclts.
TllR-6?$49 snd V1R*6S4 [Pil-??{}8]
Plannirrg Ccx*r*ssi*n S{*eting *f 5f{1217 -f,1, llrl
.: -, il lll
i .:i i; ii: i"j i:: i ::: j i:. ::i j { ; llt rl$,, q Illl,ltl,l"l'lrl']l]l 'l l' rr lfi "ll lI
.;bmitted after final agenri
DareSl lflnu* vu-51 *

{-i(t i' Ll$ Vr"gar PAgRT
I )r:p;li"tltlr:ttl $l Itltlttt n FTRST ttssi-
U S. Posgs
l-lctjrl!iFrlrrl Sr:l ! tlr:.\ {llliq:f
PAID
i-"1 Srrrh R:ri'&rr l):ire. i'd ll.xrr i"ss Vsf. ilr
l.as Tr:*r. Tr^r:J $lllf:r f {}* i-i Peair lo- !630
'Vt:
R*!*rn fkrlir* R*quested ii'i l i4
tXit'inl N*ir:e *lf Pulllc Hearing "iji,'
ity *i i-;s #*r.; ,,*,
llepl +f l}ir:r,r',;
Il
ll riu tur til* *ur p{est {}r $tplR)$ i1r llis rdglr.st" lhc*k tlt*
*il
rplIlf *r hrkxc ;tnr"l t*urr this {ilrd ill tl i,rlrkp{t $ilh p.3stijgic t lhi.
iilh1
nrrpannt{:rl irl l}lanritls al th* r{trjffss listtd ub{rve' lar this i;ide l'rllis cariJ la
{;{i:} tjl-?J4t1} {}r ntah* y$*r ilt'!!{re$ts l }vww. lsr'1,grsncv}da.Sov' }1 Ta
Cso Vil'T?4q. VAR 6l)t4
lrrulil il'r l. trlrl{lrt yr'rLf Cuntil R*:prescxlir ti vtr. ii*ase crl I {?{}? I ?'19-f}4t}5 1 392763?0
wsCn WTRKS INC
t Stir{}laT {]pP()s p gg{ g*?S
thi: l{r:qur:rt this llcq*est L,AS fs Hlj glg3-4738
tltc ilablle blanh space i]$ cd t'eir ynur con'ltnerts'
T ?rit9 r:rd y&-t904 trrlu!-??{}$l
f'larr n i * g {'.lrirr! *i*n L'teeting f 5$/2*I?
I -i ,, uf,-;i tL f,tt.{; I ii ? ;..4 *'i l l'l{1" l'l ll r lhr l' f 'lrll't ll " ll lt' Tl t{ }t l"ilit ill'rnlll
3Q31 ft

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - VAR-69804 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-67949 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SAMARITAN HOUSE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW THE BACKING OF A MOTOR VEHICLE ONTO A PUBLIC STREET
FROM A PARKING AREA WHERE SUCH IS NOT ALLOWED on 0.19 acres at the northeast
corner of Adams Avenue and 4th Street (APN 139-27-603-014), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5


RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
b 7 7 VAR-69804 A
777 77
77A 7 7777
77
77 A 77 7
77777' 777 777 777b 7b 7
7b 777 77777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
7 7
77777 777b 7b 777b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 77 77777 777
777 777
b 7
777 7 7
7
77 77
7 7777 A 7 7b
777777b 777 A7

7777
A 7 7

7A 77 7
7 7
A 7 7 A
A b A 77 7
A 7 77 7 7 7 7
7A 7 77b 7 4
7 7 7
A 777 7 77 77 7777 7
777 7 77
b 77 7 7A 7
7A 7 7
A 7
7 7
77
7 77 7 b
A 77 7 7 7
7
b 777 77 777 7 777
7A
A b A 7 b
A 7 77
b 7 77
7A
A b 77 7 7777 77
A 77777777 7 7 7
b 77 7 777b 7 77 7
7A
7777 777777 7 7 77 777777777 7' 7777777b7777
77 777777 777 77 777777777777 77 77
77777777777777 7777 77 '77 77777 77
7 7 7 A 7 7
A777 77777 777
7 7 7 7 7
77 777 7
4
b 7 VAR-69804
7
77 77
7
7 77 77 77 7 7 7
7
777777b 7777 77 777 7 77
7
777 77
77777 7
A7
7777
77 7777
A 7 7
7A 7 7 77

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-67950 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-
67949 AND VAR-69804 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAMARITAN
HOUSE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 3,060 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING on 0.19 acres at the northeast corner of Adams
Avenue and 4th Street (APN 139-27-603-014), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-


RECOMMENDATION:
3. Support Postcards
paper use, backup
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
b 7 7 SDR-67950 A
777 77
77A 7 7777
77
77 A 77 7
77777' 777 777 777b 7b 7
7b 777 77777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
7 7
77777 777b 7b 777b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 77 77777 777
777 777
b 7
777 7 7
7
77 77
7 7777 A 7 7b
777777b 777 A7

7777
A 7 7

7A 77 7
7 7
A 7 7 A
A b A 77 7
A 7 77 7 7 7 7
7A 7 77b 7 4
7 7 7
A 777 7 77 77 7777 7
777 7 77
b 77 7 7A 7
7A 7 7
A 7
7 7
77
7 77 7 b
A 77 7 7 7
7
b 777 77 777 7 777
7A
A b A 7 b
A 7 77
b 7 77
7A
A b 77 7 7777 77
A 77777777 7 7 7
b 77 7 777b 7 77 7
7A
7777 777777 7 7 77 777777777 7' 7777777b7777
77 777777 777 77 777777777777 77 77
77777777777777 7777 77 '77 77777 77
7 7 7 A 7 7
A777 77777 777
7 7 7 7 7
77 777 7
4
b 7
SDR-67950
7
77 77
7
7 77 77 77 7 7 7
7
777777b 7777 77 777 7 77
7
777 77
77777 7
A7
7777
77 7777
A 7 7
7A 7 7 77
SDR 67950
Samaritan House, Inc.
NEC Adams Avenue and 4th Street

Proposed 3.06 thousand square foot meeting house.
Proposed Use

AM Peak Hour GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF] 3.06 1.56 5
PM Peak Hour 1.49 5

Las Vegas Boulevard
Washington Avenue

Las Vegas Boulevard 33,800
Washington Avenue 33,800
This project will add approximately 34 trips per day on Adams Ave., 4th St., Las Vegas Blvd. and Washington Ave.
Currently, Las Vegas is at about 75 percent of capacity and Washington is at about 49 percent of capacity. With this
project, these capacities are expected to be unchanged. Counts are not available for Adams or 4th in this vicinity, but they
are believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 5 additional cars, or about one every twelve
minutes.
City ol l-nr Vegas PRSII

f}eponnwnt of Flaoning FHTfi.SS$T
llcvelapnr*ni Serviecr Cefl*r tj.S Foo
p o
-l]-l N'lrlh l{mho l}ri'-e. J'd F'lrlr
i-as Tcgar, l.iet** 891
*:-{vt:t LsVg*e.rY
Pn!*llfu. tt$
*turn Serrite Rtqutsterl t{i.i {} i ;ir:

{}fitial Nofi** f Publi* }Ie*ring
'J{ty * Lal; V*9.*:.
**$e r:f Fit4*l;irr.:
nu y Hall

lt
Grtl.
l{lil t.p
4t t*
lf ycu wish to fil* y*ur Prtxcrt ilr 5{IpF{)n n {hr r*gclit, *}ek hs
appnrpriutckx lxhrw atrrl rr:un {hi card if} an e*veh'rre wirh Jrustage tc the Case: $,)BT95
epann*nt cf Fla*niog al tle tldess lisled 'lxrve, fir tis sitlc of ihil carc! lc 139??$03S*1
{?*: 4${-?4$9 rr nak* yi)ltr {tln}ftefllt x wrrr..lilsve$ar**lada,g*v" If y*l wsTcgf iHc
wnrild like t{} ciraLllcr yt:ur crruneii &r:prrserttatirt, p!*asr: call tl{)?} ?39-f}4{,.5. F 0 f$x g4t3
LS Y{3,SS }"JV 89'93-4?3
: {}flr(}sl:
tlrs R*q*cst
,,ffi'fj;r;T blar:lr xpace ll ard f*r yo*r clrlrnents.

sn-$?es0 rllt-??8 |
Plnnuing C$:rxicsirn b{ecting *f 51913t?
J. ;
',,:' t:ii.-ii::"i.jr:;; j. ':i j'. ,-3 xt,t,l,,, ltlll.l,,1tll-llll'tl l,,Ilt'li, *l!tl{'lilt Il' l l,
J"bmitted after tinal agenii
outrSlsll-/rt*
sgk
{'ity cl'La:' Vcg:rr P6NT
l)r::ran nretl rrf P!innia.q Fffitct'ss{"
I]rrcirrlxlcl-lr Serr. iecs {l**ttr U.S Posl4t
PIO
*rth Riln{:hr: ri*. 3td Flcxrr
^i." l Vgs. rY
l.: \:rlgl{. },}r"va<h *l$6 !Jf*l\4".,
r '.{ 'i\ J'|-.1 ] Pr*t{}{o T5
'
Re{u rx lisrv ic* Ilequ*l*rl ;i,',, i: : i::,

fficixl Nstic* af Pnhli* I{earng
J i. i :t.'
.'/ t', :_.:.
I ir-,1: .;: i: j.;,.,_ .
\
5 H*ll
ll *r,,q-rti l':l: )$r PI'{}1.:5{ $r stlptt{rrr lr thj: rrq$51" thr:.L {llt'

t, ti)
itflpfq,t$n1 {&d :lutn lhis rar! ig an r:nr''*}*!e *lth rr:iag* {rr tltr:
txlx f,cl*rr
tlep:rnmcnt *f Pluning t the ddrss$ listcd trr;r'*. i thil sitl; rrl thir u:ld :rr
t?*lt ;1d"?199 or lnake y{xr rllllltll'n:s lt 1{'1w'14$rcgil:;nel*dit.g$v. ll Satt
as*. l-?9O
n,orlrl !ks t{ {$nla{ yc:ur {l*uruil t*frr:lisl}ttilc. g[*il:lc cill {?{l:} }]il.{lJ{}1. 13S?7S02
W$TR WIIKS INC
t $t:rltlt)k I {}l}Pt}sL. P U {}X S4?3S
thi* Id*qurat thir fcrucst LAS Vts Nv 99193-4338
Pl**se use av:rble blank space *n c;rrd fr ){)ilr t{)rlllent.
ri1R.6?f5$ trKI"??{lT
l}l rn rr i n C*nrni ssi o:t I!{ee t i n g $i Sl9ll$ I ?
j. ..j :' { i::i,:ii .i. ':: .:

iit,l,{,1,lrf f lrt,f lltlltllil}t,1" l}i,ll"'lf lt,l',}ll,ll
i.:.i:i-"ti::i i..ii.:;' tg
3b^

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - VAR-69639 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
CHABAD SOUTHERN NEVADA, INC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW AN EIGHT-FOOT TALL WROUGHT IRON FENCE IN THE FRONT YARD
WHERE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FIVE FEET IS ALLOWED on 3.03 acres at 1312 Vista
Drive (APN 162-06-501-004), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-69138].


RECOMMENDATION:
1. Abeyance Request Letter
5. Photo(s)
May 6 2017
VAR-69639
Item 32
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CHABAD SOUTHERN NEVADA, INC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-69639 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to N/A
conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 258
PROTESTS 1
APPROVALS 20
PB
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
4. City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
PB
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct an eight-foot-high wrought iron fence to secure

the front yard of an existing private school at 1321 Vista Drive.
ISSUES
A Variance (VAR-69639) is required to permit an eight-foot-high wrought iron fence

in the front yard, where a five-foot-high fence (with at least the top three feet being
50% open) is the maximum allowed. Staff recommends denial of this request.
The proposed fence is placed at the back of sidewalk and will therefore slightly
partially obscure the perimeter landscaping provided along Vista Drive.
The applicant has made no revisions to the request or plans as of 05/24/17.
ANALYSIS
The subject site is developed with an existing private school facility and is zoned R-E
(Residence Estates). The R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district restricts fences
within the front yard of properties to be a maximum of five feet in height with the top
three feet being at least 50% open. The applicant is proposing to construct an eight-
foot-high wrought iron fence that will comply with the opacity requirements but exceeds
the overall height permitted.
The applicants justification letters states that the fence is being constructed to provide a
greater level of security for the private school and is being funded by the federal
government.
Staff has a concern that the fence is being proposed at the back of the sidewalk and will
therefore partially obscure the perimeter landscaping that was required when the private
school was approved and constructed.
The site plan submitted with the application depicts improvements to the site (widening
of the southern driveway) that are not a part of this variance request. As such, those
improvements would not be approved as part of this application and will require
submittal of the plans for review. This request is for the fence alone.
Staff is recommending denial of this request due to the fact that there is no unique or
extraordinary circumstance and the fence will partially obscure the perimeter
landscaping provided to buffer the private school from the surrounding residential
neighborhood.
PB
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]
order to:



applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to construct a fence that
exceeds the height standards of the ordinance. Alternatively, reducing the height of the
fence to five feet would be in conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the
absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded
that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm
of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Variance
06/22/78 (V-0049-78) to allow a 5-foot high wrought iron fence in the front yard
setback area at 1254 Vista Drive.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment denied a request for a Variance (V-
10/24/85 0100-85) to allow a proposed Commercial Child Care facility at 1254
Vista Drive.
PB
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]

The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Special Use
10/24/91 Permit (U-0256-91) to allow a proposed Synagogue with a Child Care
use at 1254 Vista Drive.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0057-94) from R-E
(Residence Estates) to P-R (Professional Office and Parking) at 1253
08/17/94
Arville Street. The Planning Commission recommended approved the
request.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Plot Plan
07/25/95 and Elevation Review [U-0085-95(1)] for a proposed 7,700 square-foot
two story off-site church related school at 1253 Arville Street.
The Planning Commission struck a request from the agenda for a Site
Development Plan Review [Z-57-94(1)] for a proposed 11,959 square
03/26/98
foot synagogue at 1261 Arville Street. This item was replaced with a
Variance (V-0013-98) at the Planning Commissions discretion.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Variance
(V-0013-98) to allow a 10-foot rear yard setback where 15 feet is
04/14/98 required; and an 11,959 square-foot building where 10,000 square feet
is the maximum allowed on property located at 1261 Arville Street.
NOTE: This application replaced Z-57-94(1).
The City Council denied a request for a Special Use Permit and a Site
Development Plan Review (U-0065-01) which includes a reduction in
the amount of required perimeter and parking lot landscaping for a
08/15/01
proposed 4,893 square-foot church complex located at 1214 Vista
Drive. The Planning Commission also recommended denial of the
request.
The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Variance (VAR-
22086) to allow a 23-foot setback where residential adjacency
standards require an 87-foot setback and to allow a 44-foot building
08/09/07
height where a 35-foot building height is the maximum allowed for a
proposed 84,276 square-foot private school adjacent to the west side
of Vista Drive, approximately 530 feet south of Charleston Boulevard.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
18342) for a proposed 84,276 square-foot, 44-foot tall Private School
01/09/08 adjacent to the west side of Vista Drive, approximately 530 feet south
of Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-37627) to allow two
institutional signs where only one is allowed. The Planning
06/16/10
Commission recommended approval of the request, and staff
recommended denial.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]
05/09/17
in abeyance to the June 13, 2017 Planning Commission meeting.
PB
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]


A Building Demolition Dust Control permit (#142464) was issued for
06/30/09 three detached structures at 1312 Vista Drive. The building permit
A Building Permit (#143557) was issued for a Construction Trailer at
07/15/09
1312 Vista Drive. The building permit was finalized on 08/28/09.
A Building Permit (#143882) was issued for Sprinklers for a Temporary
07/24/09 Construction Trailer at 1312 Vista Drive. The building permit was
finalized on 08/28/09.
A Building Permit (#146017) was issued for early grading at 1312 Vista
08/21/09
Drive. The building permit has not received a final inspection.
A Building Permit (#128454) was issued for a Private School at 1312
Vista Drive. The building permit has not received a final inspection.
A Building Permit (#128456) was issued for On-Site Improvements
09/18/09 and Hardscapes at 1312 Vista Drive. The building permit has not
received a final inspection.
A Building Permit (#128457) was issued for a Trash Enclosure at 1312
Vista Drive. The building permit has not received a final inspection.
02/16/17 Description
A neighborhood meeting was neither required nor held for this request.
Field Check
Staff completed a routine site visit and noted a well maintained private
3/30/17
school facility.

Site Area
Net Acres 3.03
PB
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138]
Surrounding Existing Land

Property Use Planned Land Use Existing Zoning
R (Rural Density R-E (Residence
Subject Property Private School
Residential) Estates)
North Church
Single Family
Residence &
South Short Term
Residential
Rental
Single Family
East Residence and
Undeveloped
SC (Service P-R (Professional
West Synagogue
Commercial) Office and Parking)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)

Governing
Document
Vista Drive Local Street Title 13 60 Y
PB
VAR-69639

CLV Planning - Application Form
Application Number: PRJ-69138
Application/Petition For: DESERT TORAH ACADEMY FENCE VARIANCE
ProjectAddress (Location): 1312 VISTA DRIVE
Project Name DESERT TORAH ACADEMY FENCE VARIANCE
Assessors Parcel #(s): 16206501004
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN)
Is the Application Information Yes

Correct:
If no, ...change what
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
Gross Acres:
Lots/Units:
Additional Information:
Applicant First Name: Yehoshua
Applicant Last Name: Harlig
Applicant Address: 1261 Arville St
Applicant City: Las Vegas
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Zip: 89102
Applicant Phone: 702-259-0770
Applicant Fax: 702-877-4700
Applicant Email: rabbi@chabadlv.com
Rep First Name: Yehoshua
Rep Last Name: Harlig
Rep Address: 1261 Arville St
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep State: NV
Rep Zip: 89102
Rep Phone: 702-259-0770
Rep Fax: 702-877-4700
Rep Email: rabbi@chabadlv.com
3/28/2017 11:27:08 AM VAR-69639 Page 1 of 2

CLV Planning - Application Form
I certify that I am the applicant and Yes
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2

CHABAD SOUTHERN NEVADA INC 1254 VISTA DR LAS VEGAS, NV 89102-1610
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email

Yehoshua Harlig Chabad of Southern Nevada Director chabadlv@aol.com
VAR-69639
3/28/2017 11:27:08 AM Page 2 of 2
VAR-69639

VAR-69639
VAR-69639

VAR-69639
VAR-69639 [PRJ-69138] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHABAD SOUTHERN NEVADA, INC
1312 VISTA DRIVE
03/30/2017
1312 VISTA DRIVE
03/30/2017
1312 VISTA DRIVE
03/30/2017

777
A 7777 7 b 77
7
A 7
7 7 7

7,
,7A

,b A 7
7 7
7 A
b 77

77 7 7 77 7

b 77 7 77777777777 77777
A 777 777
7 7>

77>7>7 77 77 7 7777
b 77

77777777777 777 7 7
77 7777777

b 77 777 777777 7777 7

7 7 7777 777 77
77
7
777 777777 777 77V7777
b 7 77 7 7 77777 77 777V777777
7 7 777777

V777
b 77 7 V

7 7 V7
b AA
7
b 77
7 7 7
77

7
>7A >
77
7 7
7 7 7
7 7 7
A 7 77 77b 77b 7 7,7A 7 7 7 77 77A 7 7 77 7

7 7 7 V 7 b 7

VAR-69639
.::::.:'.i':rlj r':i:lj
:::..:::.i,.:llt.i:;i:: :i :r:.::i . : :
'-:r lj_-::.:j f.i:- j...:
6\ .... .: ....:,,..... .. .... ...

.,.. ...:..,ir.'.ir:,tj-,.i.r't::.:.:::.:1.;:r:jjiiii::: ,:.....,,.,.,.;.. ..,.;,,i,., ,
e
N : :::1:1:::: : : ;i:r '
. .. .:..ri:i: i:....f. . I . ,-
Cit1.- ol- Las Vegas FRST

l)epartntcrr:t oi' Pinning F*$Ci-ASl,$ll
U S. Postage
Developnrent Serv ices Cenrer pt f
l33 North lancho Drire. -1'r Floor las Veas, NV
!-.ls Veg.as. Ncrrda .c9 I (.16
Fr1. N. i63
Return Service Requested

Official Notice of Public Hearing
fl
zH ?c s5,95
r
v)
h s;::+
tl
U) if 'y*u *ish'boxio fiie 'e;ur proest or s$ppori on f hs rqirc'st. <Jre.ck ti:cr
arrrupriate bcrl()w anei retunt this card in an i'rnrielope witit postage to the
Case: VARS9639
il4tarnment clf Planning at the ddress listed above. tar this sidL' of this carrJ Lo r 620661 001 1
J{,r:U 16+7499 or make your a[ *'wr'.lasvegsnevada.-gov. Il y-.ou PATRON GUADALUPE

ve, please call (702) 229'6405. 43OO MOUNTAIN VIEW BLVD
i,i-'{rrild like t.0 coutact yur Council
LAS VEGAS NV 89102.3819
I SI-IPPORT I OPPOSE
aO
t-{ ihis Request rhis Requesi
0)
(o use available blank sPace card for your comments.
a
6
-
\:lr R-69639 [PRJ-69 r 38l
6\
'r"'ttlirn nirrg Ccr mrni ssi on Meetin g af 5 19 /2017
-
ir:j r.lj) i; . 'i ;:'i"i ;j 'i i:ji .::i ,i_.i
;l tr,l,itrr lf,l li fI'itiilr 'l[it l,,il,fi,1,,t, l't 'litl'tfilil'
x ;::.i i-:._ ._:.
E
o
;i
N
-
Fl
6\
t,"bmilted atter final ageri:,
aarcSl|lt1o,*
U U?
513/217 86:29 1'728784362 S TAVLOR PAGE 1"/I
City of Lfls vegs FfiSHT

Deparnent of Pltnning ns'fq.ssuAL
US.Porhd
De veloomi,ntScrvicet Center , iAl
333 Nfi Rancbo Drive,3'd Floor |r/
i
Las Vegas, Ncvada 89106
"1,.r ' .
Return Serrice Requ$ted .
Official Notice of Public Hearing
:'
i$ Hl D
'riiSr
city l-{lt
lr.i. f .,,, vitl rji i;ru' vegs
ptanning
!;+'
. Dept nf
If you wish to file your pfotest or tupport on this requestr check the
appropriate box below sld rctrrn this csd in err envelope wit poetage to the VAR{9839
GASC;
epartment of Plm[ig il tbe ad&ess listed above, fa this side of thi Fsrd to 1620602002
(102) 4fd-7499 or make Your commerits at www.lasvegasrcvada"gov. :'trf ypu TAYLOR SAMUL WALTER III
P O OX ?7e
would lce to conttct your Council Repseutative, please call (702) ?29'&05.
TAS VEGAS NV S126.1679
I OPFOSE
NHHffiH thie Request
Pleas use avaitable blank space on card for your comments'

YAR.6963e IPRJ.69138I
Planning Comrnission Meeting of 5l9l20ll . ,#
linlllllllrl,htllr,,lltt, l'lf l,l I,lli,l!1, lill,f i,tl,.l
-]:-{t1;p:'i..ip t i+ jifr
r-,irtrmi{ted after final agenoa
oarc $[7 nn
qbA
{liry of [-al V*;x PRSi'
flcparlrncnt ol Pla*ning ffST'SS$AL
I-cvrloprutllt Servecs Ccrr*r U S Polg8
PA }
313 I'lonh llaorhr ilrive , J'd Fkrr
Us
ve983, NV
I.as Yegas, ll*vrl ll9l{} RCN'V Psri f0- 1630
Rtturn S*rvice R*quested l'lT $ { ?$17

tllTirirl Notic rf lluli* llearlrg *rt rl irrninr'
*f La* V:ai
{-rty
|l
l0 ttt
lf you ri'sh ttr l'ih: yr'ur r1-{*it rx $ul'}ll{}tt s}ll his teq$e$t. l,rh tht:
appr*rriate box helo*' and r*un this ci*l in *n *nv*l*pc xilh posllttc t* thr
{s*: Vf-{i9.?3
llepannlcnl *f Flirnning xt tlu rldtrcsr lixter! alxrx, lar &is sldr: rrf this :ani t 16U8tl 71 I
tl? 4.{-?.{9t $r r:lk* -!'{}t r{)lttrt1{:t-tt ;tt 6*\l'14 lasvegamevrda.got. ll you GLU F*Y I & J'4f.ttCE M
rl}1}ld like t{1 c{)ntrct vfiur {iru:ril R*presr:ntirlir'*fpltase c*lJ {?{^T:} 3:9-f:"t{15 328 zTH ST
Rtlt lSLt'lD !L 1{1
st,lfP{}tT {lPl,{}5
lhis *qnc:t t.hir Rtrrrc;l{
Plersc *se ar'rlli:le blittth spiu* nn cfdl f'*r y*ur cntnmsnls.
v , R-93? [I'RJ-{ipI "181
Plnrurirrg Corrrrrirsirtn N4cctirrg r'1,"f{?{fl.l? ,.. , , it ti,! | rht i,l {,lt I l,l I,l,,ll ll l,l l ll
.' j:.f"':i...I {..1l"-J i:: r:;;,..,.i lt h ' ,[1 1 li I '11 l{ 'l '{ I
: -lmitted after final
Dare 6lLllfln *
"[o&
=
9
City oft-rsYegm PSFT

Dcprtmmt of Plming
Devlopment Sewices Ceoter
RFSOrSsUr
U.S. P!6tds
;
PAID-
-133 North Rtro Drive, 3r Floor {s Vgas, Iv =.
Ias Veg', Nevade 8916 Pcrmit No. t630
Return Service Rquested

Olficial Notice of Public tlearing
\ Crly tl,ril
C: VAge
1 62051 0015
GRAHAM S & O PROFETIES L LC
,I353
I OPPOSE AFVILLE ST
ffir*rur*rblank
Please use available
thls Rqust
space on card for Your comrnenfs.
LASVEGSNV 891021608
vaR-69639 [PRJ-69138]
Planning Commission Meeting of 5/9/201?
-
F lF{';3F;'frffr f r'i. 't r'"iJ |,Iu,,||,| IrIIIIIIII'If ,IIII||II'''||'1I||'|'|,||.I,II||,II|,Ir
_'-bmitted atter linal

agen{rd ^
nateSl$lrl ,*, Lt[rflr

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-69617 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
EAB INVESTMENT COMPANY - OWNER: CRPP, LLC - For possible action on a request for
a Special Use Permit FOR A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY on the west side of Rancho Drive,
570 feet south of Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-13-512-006), C-M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone,
Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-69582]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
1. Withdrawal Request for SUP-69617 [PRJ-69582]
2. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-69617 and SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
3. Conditions and Staff Report (Not Applicable for SUP-69617)
4. Supporting Documentation - SUP-69617 and SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
5. Photo(s) - SUP-69617 and SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
6. Justification Letter - SUP-69617 and SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
7. Protest Postcards for SUP-69617 and SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
May 23, 2017
SUP-69617
SUP-69617 [PRJ-69582]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: EAB INVESTMENT COMPANY - OWNER:
CRPP, LLC
** APPLICANT REQUESTS THIS ITEM BE WITHDRAWN WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FROM THE JUNE 13, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION **
SUP-69617

SUP-69617

Ab7bA
7 7 7 7
7777777777

7

7
A7
A
7
b

7

7

7AA
A7
b77 b
Ab7AA
b77A7A
77 7Ab
7777

A
b b7b
A

7 b 7

77Ab7

A7A77
7A b A

7A b A 7
77A7A
A7A7AA7
777A77777b
b777777A77777A7
A 7bA
7A b A 77Ab7

7A b A 7 A7A77

bA

7A b A A

7

7 b
A77bA
77Ab77
A7A77

A
7A b A

bA

7A b A A
7

7A b A

7A b A
7A
Abb

A7
bA
7
7
7

A7
7
bb7
b7
7 7
A7
7A
SUP-69617 and SDR-69618

SUP-69617 and SDR-69618

SUP-69617 [PRJ-69582] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SDR-69618 - APPLICANT: EAB INVESTMENT
COMPANY - OWNER: CRPP, LLC
WEST SIDE OF RANCHO DRIVE, SOUTH OF CHEYENNE AVENUE
03/30/2017

SUP-69617 and SDR-69618
{JilY ,-rf hts Yr"'gal
l lerurtmcnr trI llarning
lf **lVtr* pfi6,Fr
rngrg.sr t
{ )r;r,elop*lent Serires Cenle U S" Potr0o
-.11 l\rti lian:hr r'-. ld F*:r

,..ti * .q ;1111; PA D
t Yi!r" llv
l"r Vcgr- l\evarla S9l{Xi MtN.tffi
.ili ir! l"-tia {*gS
Rturn S*rvice R*q**sted llt:i *f l";1nniili,l
fflcisl {ntit* sf Fublie llearing
{ity t{alt
{tt i l
ll you r*isll *r fle y*ur prote$t r $upxln cn this r$qur*t, hur:ll thc
rppropratr trr ?:*l*w sRd retum lhis tcrd in ar **vel*pr xilh trx:stage tn thc
SUP{96 1 ?. SR4fll8
Llerar:*renl *f' Plaruing t the ad{hes{ }isted :r}xrve" fx thi* si'le of thi* e lril u - - ^ ^Cse:
r3136t033
l:{}l} 4{11-?J!}!? ilr n::rlie }drur e$nreels {i www.asYgawcr.'*ei*,gr"rv. If yotr *BIT JUAN CALOS
*rulit l:ih* t{r cntact your C*runeii Reprertnafive. rl*as* crli {?01} 33*-{{5. F C| B*X S42?
NLRAY FAH FL 3348C.S47
ri:ffii,i f lrxff*
Plcrsc ule *vuiiatr* blr*rh space on car*j f-*:r yr;rur cr:lttr.lcllT.
r;U F-$961 ? rnd SR-S96I* [PAJ-$952]
Planning C,:mnissica Meeting of 19/?*17
tll,lltt,t,lf'tltl$|i{rl,if ',, ' 'l llit, l,l, fl,
;i ;:: F ilt r' ; ;:' 1 -1 .:l ,;J i$ "',1:
s,,,f,i1 '1,
5v8?
p,l
7023139372
May 05 17,11"53a vern/none
City ofLas Vegas

PRST
Department ofPlanning
F|BSICT.ASSInA*-
Development Servces Center U,S Posgge
333 Nonh Rancho Drive,36 Floor PID
Las Vegas, Nevada 891 06 t Veg,llV
.l630
Psnl fb,
Return Service Requested

Official Notice of Public lfring
\ .t
r ity Halt
u.P
Js.t!l
Tf you wisl to file your protes{ or support on this request, check the
appropriate box below and retur this card in an envelope with postage to the
Department ofPlanning at the addess listed above, fax this side ofthis card to
('102) 461-'7499 or make your comments l www.lasvegasnevada.gov. lf you
rvould like to concact your Council Representatiw, please call (.702)229-6405. SAlO6t I O0eouse:
t
suPsol7, sOHsS6la
MORALES LIVING TFUST
I SL'PPORT I OPPOSE MORLES VEFINON W A RACHELLE TRS
this Request this Request SIOO FANCHER AVE
LASVEGAS NV 89108-4042
Please use avilable blank space on for your comrnets.
SUP-69617 and SDR-69618 [PRJ-6es82]
pranning Commission Meeting of 51912017
';) 'll t,tl, tl l,tl llllilltt t llll,l I luth l,,ll,t

; & F[ ll' r., i'.r l* .1 t$ 'fi ]: ; rii ll,[,llflll '1,'lt
ST53?
City trf Lx* Y*gas pff$ffT
llepa**rent of Planni ng
**:vel*pm**i Srvices Ccnler
ntfiv. FIRST{['$8nlf
u.s.r@03
PAI 9
:l3l Nqrnh Ransb(l l)ive. 3td Fl{)'r
t1$ vegel, f.Jecattt 89lt;
rT $ 3 ?1 t-*V@,Hv
Ptnr&f{. lto
*+:1>l tsl Piarr:ing

**turn $ervice ltequest*d *iiT o! l"ils Veas
{}ffi*int l{stic* af Pu}ltt H**rlng
rirti* {iy l.l!l
lf ytlu *ish tc file 3o*r prfe$ r suplxlrt on thic rgqu:$t, :hxk tlw
appmrriate bax bcl*w crul relnrn this :ar'd in an enrclope wirh Posttgt tei the , . -Casc: $UPg1 7, S0R'96.l8
cpa*ment nf Flanaing at re att*ess listed ab<lvc, fr his sicle cf thi.s *ard t I3813614013
{?{}?} ,164-7499 ar make Y*rur c(.'t*renls t ww\ . latvegit*nevadr'
g*v' If ycu WfrIGi{TJCI'.{N R
1 6 ITIL c.NANlf.JM ST
rry*uld like ldl snJt your Council R*pasentalive, pleare {*l t?*3} 2?!}'45' t-As vGA$ f*v 8918-48?
l,,y,il, gl iJl',iif*
Pleese i,se &vaikble blnnk spacc an *a:d far yorr cirnre*ls'
Stjr'6pl? nd $DR-6961t {r&}'951}3
Planning Commissior Meging . ,i, ll,,*l,lll,, ll,-{'|l-,ff h lllt-'l,ltf lll'i$tr}i{,'1|,,11'fl
:J '5 "1532917.--
hr r{ Ll F- r'{ r eJ '", t-.' !3
7L53P

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-69618 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-
69617 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: EAB INVESTMENT COMPANY - OWNER:
CRPP, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
MINI-STORAGE FACILITY AND OUTDOOR VEHICLE PARKING WITH WAIVERS TO
ALLOW A THREE-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE NORTH
PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on a portion of 4.78 acres on the
west side of Rancho Drive, approximately 570 feet south of Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-13-
512-006), C-M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-69582]. Staff


RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: EAB INVESTMENT COMPANY - OWNER:
CRPP, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-69618 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 189
PROTESTS 3
APPROVALS 0
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
3. All development shall be in conformance with the site and landscape plan, date
stamped 05/23/17, except as amended by conditions herein.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a three-foot wide landscape
buffer on the north property line where eight feet is required. That waiver shall only
include the extent of the parcel included as part of this project.
5. This parking lot shall not be used for the rental of automobiles or the repair or sale
of any vehicles.

PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
of this project with the Rancho Drive Capacity Improvements project and any
other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. A sliver of public right-of-
way adjacent to Rancho Drive will be required by the City Engineers Office on
Assessors Parcel Number # 138-13-512-006. Comply with the recommendations
of the City Engineer.
11. Prior to the issuance of any permits, a Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage
Study must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior
to the issuance of any building or grading permits or submittal of any construction
drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways
recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site
shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility
improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood
of this site. A Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Conditional Letter
of Map Revision (CLOMR)/Letter of Map Revision shall also be obtained as part of
the required technical drainage study.
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to develop a parking lot on a vacant lot adjacent to their
existing commercial/industrial facility at 3065 North Rancho Drive to provide additional
parking for the existing Truck Rental business operating onsite.
ISSUES
Previously the applicant requested a Special Use Permit (SUP-69617) for Mini-
Storage to allow this additional parking to serve as long term storage of personal
automobiles. The applicant submitted a request to withdraw that application on
05/23/17.
Within the C-M (Commercial/Industrial) zoning district, Truck Rental is listed as a
permitted use.
The applicant has requested a waiver of the perimeter landscape requirements of
title 19.08 to permit a three-foot-wide landscape buffer on the north property line
where eight feet is required. Staff supports this waiver request.
To assure that the proposed lot continues to comply with the UDC, staff is
recommending a condition of approval that specifically prohibits the rental, repair, or
sales of vehicles on the subject property.
ANALYSIS
The proposed development will provide additional parking and storage for a Truck
Rental establishment in the facility on the parcel to the west. As it is intended for
standard automobiles it was designed in conformance with the standards for a
commercial parking lot per Title 19.08. Truck Rental is a permitted use within the C-M
(Commercial/Industrial) zoning district and as such there are no specific development
standards to that use.
This property is being designed and developed specifically for parking associated with
the Truck Rental establishment on the adjacent site and as such a condition of approval
is recommended that prohibits the rental, repair or sale of vehicles on this property.
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
The landscape plan depicts planter fingers for every six parking spaces with shade
trees and shrubbery. The only required perimeter landscaping for the property is on the
north property line as all other areas are within the Cheyenne Rancho Professional
Plaza commercial subdivision. The applicant has requested a waiver to reduce the
required perimeter landscaping on the north property line from eight feet down to three
feet in width, and that would include an exception to allow reduced landscape materials
providing two trees in the perimeter landscape buffer instead of the required four trees.
The adjacent parcel to the north is developed with a commercial shopping center and
this portion of the site is the loading/service area of the property so reducing
landscaping will have minimal impact on the adjacent use. Staff therefore supports the
waiver for perimeter landscaping.
The proposed parking lot will be used in conjunction with the existing facility to the west.
As such, all proposed improvements are designed in conformance with Title 19.08
standards (with the exception of a waiver request for perimeter landscaping on the north
property line). Therefore, the use is appropriate for the area which is developed with a
mix of commercial and light industrial uses. Staff recommends approval of the Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-69618) with conditions; including a specific prohibition
of the rental, repair, or sale of vehicles on this property.

The proposed vehicle storage will be screened from view by a six-foot-tall block
wall and the storage area has been designed to Title 19.08 standards for a
commercial parking lot with landscaping and planter fingers. Therefore, it will be
harmonious and compatible with the surrounding commercial and light industrial
developments.
commercial parking lot with landscaping and planter fingers. The applicant has
requested a waiver to the perimeter landscaping requirement on the north
property line to allow a three-foot-wide buffer where eight feet is required.
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]

The subject site is accessed from Rancho Drive, a 120-foot-wide Primary Arterial,
via a private, internal roadway and is more than adequate for the proposed use.
The internal circulation will allow all necessary movements on site and will not
negatively impact roadways or traffic.
City;
commercial parking lot with landscaping and planter fingers. The construction and
landscaping materials proposed are appropriate for this use and this area of the
city.

commercial parking lot with landscaping and planter fingers. Therefore, it will be
harmonious and compatible with the surrounding commercial and light industrial
developments.
The public health, safety and welfare will be guaranteed by building permit review
and construction inspection.

The City Council approved an application to Rezone (Z-0009-91) the
03/20/91 subject tract from R-E (Residence Estates) and C-2 (General
Commercial) to C-M (Commercial/Industrial). This action expired.
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]

The City Council approved an application to Rezone (Z-0090-95) the
subject tract from R-E (Residence Estates) and C-2 (General
12/20/95
Commercial) to C-M (Commercial/Industrial). The Planning
Commission and staff recommended
The City Council approved an Extension of Time [Z-0090-95(1)] to
01/22/97 Rezone the subject tract from R-E (Residence Estates) and C-2
(General Commercial) to C-M (Commercial/Industrial).
(General Commercial) to C-M (Commercial/ Industrial).
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0036-
97(1) and Z-0090-95(3)] for a proposed 328,121 square foot
07/29/99
professional plaza on the subject tract. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval on 05/22/97.
(General Commercial) to C-M (Commercial/Industrial).
Rezone the subject tract from R-E (Residence Estates) and C-2
09/19/01 (General Commercial) to C-M (Commercial Industrial) and an
Extension of Time of the Site Development Plan Review [Z-0036-
97(2)].
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
5370) for a 50,000 square foot commercial development on the subject
12/15/04 site (as part of a larger development). The first phases were
constructed on the adjacent parcel to the west. The Planning
Commission and City Council recommended approval.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold SUP-69617 and SDR-
05/09/17 69618 [PRJ-69582] in abeyance to the June 13, 2017 Planning
Commission meeting.
The applicant submitted a letter requesting withdrawal of the Special
05/23/17
Use Permit (SUP-69617) for a Mini-Storage use.


A building permit (#5006907) was issued for a multi-tenant
01/04/06 commercial/industrial building on the adjacent parcel to the west.
Construction was completed 01/10/07.
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]
A pre-application meeting was held and the submittal requirements for
03/20/17
a Special Use Permit were discussed.
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held
Field Check
Staff completed a routine site visit, noting a well maintained, vacant
03/30/17
parcel free of debris.

Site Area
Net Acres 4.78

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject LI/R (Light Industrial / C-M (Commercial /
Vacant
Property Research) Industrial)
SC (Service C-2 (General
North Shopping Center
LI/R (Light Industrial / C-M (Commercial /
South Vacant
Research) Industrial)
East Vacant
Multi-Tenant
West Commercial/
Industrial
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]

A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y or N
Trails N/A
Assessment)

Min. Lot Size N/A 208,216 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet N/A Y
Side 10 Feet N/A Y
Corner 10 Feet N/A Y
Rear 20 Feet N/A Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings N/A N/A Y
Max. Lot Coverage N/A 0% Y
Max. Building Height N/A N/A Y
Trash Enclosure N/A N/A Y
Mech. Equipment N/A N/A Y

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 4 Trees 2 Trees *N
South N/A 0 Trees 0 Trees Y
East N/A 0 Trees 0 Trees Y
West N/A 0 Trees 0 Trees Y
PB
SDR-69618 [PRJ-69582]

Ratio Trees
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 4 Trees 2 Trees *N
12 Trees 12 Trees Y
spaces
Min. Zone Width
South N/A 0 Feet Y
East N/A 0 Feet Y
West N/A 0 Feet Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y
*A waiver was requested for the north property line perimeter landscaping.

Governing
Document
Planned Streets and
Rancho Drive Primary Arterial Highways Map 120 Y
Waivers
To allow a three foot
An eight foot wide landscape
wide landscape
buffer on the north property Approval
buffer on the north
line.
property line.
Exception
Perimeter landscaping to
To allow two trees on
include four trees (1 per 20
the north property Approval
linear feet) on the north
line.
property line.
PB
SDR-69618

SDR-69618

Ab7bA
7 7 7 7
7777777777

7
A7
7

7AA
7A

A7

7
b77 b
Ab7AA
b77A7A
7A b A 77 7Ab
7777
7
b7b
7A b A 7

77Ab7

7A b A A7A77
7A b A 7

77A7A
A7A7AA7
777A77777b
b777777A77777A7
A 7bA
77Ab7

A7A77

A
b

7A b A 7 A

7 AbA
7

7 7A
A77bA
77Ab77
A7A77

7 7A
7A b A 7

b

7A b A 7A

7A b A
7

7A b A 7 b
7A
A
Abb

A7
bA
7
7
7

A7
7
bb7
b7
7 7
A7
7A
SDR-69618 - REVISED
SDR-69618 - REVISED


SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SDR-68686 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKET STREET SUMMERLIN RE, LLC -
For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 72-
BED CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME WITH A WAIVER TO
ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS
REQUIRED ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, A TWO-FOOT PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED ON A PORTION OF THE
WEST PROPERTY LINE, A SIX-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE, AND A 10-FOOT
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED ON A PORTION OF
THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE on 2.22 acres at 7540 Smoke Ranch Road (APN 138-15-402-
002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-68685]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKET STREET SUMMERLIN RE,
LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-68686 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 202
PROTESTS 3
APPROVALS 0
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (ZON-60372) shall be

required.
3. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot wide landscape
buffer with no perimeter landscaping on the north property line, a six-foot wide
landscape buffer on the east property line, a two-foot wide landscape buffer on
portions of the west property line, and a 10-foot wide landscape buffer on portions
of the south property line in accordance with the landscape plan.
4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan
date stamped 05/01/17; and building elevations date stamped 02/23/17, except as
5. A perpetual access easement/agreement to allow access to the cul-de-sac on the

property to the north must be obtained and submitted for review prior to the
issuance of building permits for this facility.
6. The building elevations shall be revised prior to submittal of a building permit to

incorporate an architectural base tying the building into the ground in accordance
with Title 19.08.040.
7. All fences on the property shall be designed in accordance with Title 19.08.040.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]
Conditions Page Two

Public Works
13. Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts on
Smoke Ranch Road adjacent to this site, if any, and replace with new
improvements meeting Current City Standards concurrent with development of this
site.
14. The proposed driveways on Smoke Ranch Road shall meet the approval of the
City Traffic Engineer. The western driveway shall have right-in/right-out access
only. Extend the existing median in Smoke Ranch Road to a length and location
acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer to prohibit left turns into the proposed
western driveway.
15. Obtain a private sewer easement for this site on Assessors Parcel Number
#138-15-410-032 to provide public sewer service to this site. Alternatively, this site
must construct and connect to a public sewer line in Smoke Ranch Road that is
designed at a depth and location acceptable to the Sanitary Sewer Planning
Section of the Department of Public Works.
16. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets
concurrent with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend
from the sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway
network and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.
Services to discuss fire requirements for this site. The design and layout of all
onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the approval of the
Department of Fire Services.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]
18. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to build a 37,156 square-foot, 72-bed convalescent care

facility/nursing home on a vacant lot at 8504 Smoke Ranch Road. In October of 2015
this site was previously approved for an 80 bed convalescent care facility/nursing home,
but it was never built.
ISSUES
The applicant submitted a revised justification letter, site plan and landscape plan
05/01/17 which changed the number of beds affiliated with the request from 60 to 72
and necessitated renotification. The plans submitted did not change beyond clearly
identifying the number of beds in the facility for the required parking calculation.
Waivers have been requested to allow a zero-foot wide landscape buffer with no
perimeter landscaping on the north property line; a six-foot wide landscape buffer on
the east property line; a two-foot wide landscape buffer on a portion of the west
property line; and a 10-foot wide landscape buffer on a portion of the south property
line. Staff does not support the waiver requests.
ANALYSIS
The subject site (8504 Smoke Ranch Road) is located on the north side of Smoke
Ranch Road approximately 315 feet east of Buffalo Drive and is a 2.22 acre vacant lot.
The site was rezoned from U (Undeveloped) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) by the City
council on 10/21/15, and an 80-bed Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home was also
approved on the same date. No waivers were required at the time, and staff
recommended approval of that project. That facility was never constructed.
The Convalescent Care Facility / Nursing Home use is defined as A building or

structure designed, used, or intended to be used to house and provide care for persons
who have a chronic physical or mental illness or infirmity, but who do not need medical,
surgical or other specialized treatment normally provided by a hospital. This use
includes a rest home and nursing home, as well as a use that would qualify as a
Community Residence except for the limitation on the number of residents, but does not
include an assisted living apartment, hospital or other medical facility that is
specifically defined in LVMC Chapter 19.18. A Convalescent Care Facility / Nursing
Home is a permitted use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]
After submittal of their application, the applicant submitted revised site plan and
landscape plan drawings dated 03/08/17 to provide the appropriate side setbacks, and
now is in conformance with all setback requirements for the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district. The submittal was further revised to correct the number of beds to 72
with a revised justification letter, site plan and landscape plan dated 05/01/17
The proposed facility will have 33 parking spaces, where 21 are required by Title 19.12.
Access to the site will be from two driveways off Smoke Ranch Road, and the majority
of parking is provided in front of the facility. A 25-foot wide access drive allows access
to the rear of the facility along the east and north property lines. The Department of Fire
and Rescue requires a turnaround or secondary egress from the site, which is not
currently provided. The applicant is proposing to have access to the cul-de-sac bulb
north of the site. A condition of approval has been added to require a perpetual access
easement/agreement to be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits.
The proposed facility would be composed of stucco walls, a tiled gabled roof structure,
and have vinyl windows. The existing medical offices on the north and east, and the
retail center on the west are all flat roofed structures with parapets. The only gabled
roof structures in the immediate vicinity are the single family homes on the south side of
Smoke Ranch Road which are on 41-foot wide lots. The proposed facility includes a
gabled roof structure that spans nearly the full length of the 295-foot wide facility. While
the use proposed is quasi-residential, the adjacent non-residential structures in the Las
Vegas Technology Center are the overwhelming aesthetic and therefore the proposed
gabled roof structure is incompatible with the surrounding development.
To achieve compatibility with surrounding development, a condition of approval has

been included that requires the addition of a clear architectural base in accordance with
the architectural design standards of Title 19.08.040. Additionally, the submitted
elevations appear to depict a chain link fence on the south faade, which would be
aesthetically incompatible with the surrounding developments. Staff is recommending a
condition of approval that requires all fencing on the site to be in compliance with Title
19.08.040.
The landscape plan submitted by the applicant reflects the waivers that they are
requesting for the proposal. On the north property line, where an eight-foot wide
landscape buffer is required, the applicant is proposing to have no landscape buffer or
landscape materials. On the east property line, where an eight-foot wide landscape
buffer is required, the applicant is proposing to have a six-foot wide landscape buffer.
On the south property line, where a 15-foot wide landscape buffer is required, the
applicant is proposing that portions of that buffer be 10 feet in width. Finally, on the
west property line, where an eight-foot wide landscape buffer is required, the applicant
is proposing that portions of that buffer be 2 feet in width. Staff finds that these requests
are indicative of a proposal that overbuilds the subject site and therefore does not
support the waivers.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]
The rest of the landscape plan is in accordance with the requirements of Title 19.08 for
the number and species of landscape materials proposed, including the provision of
parking lot landscaping.
Staff finds that the use is appropriate for the site, but this proposal will overbuild the site,
hence the necessity to request landscape waivers for every property line. Therefore,
staff recommends denial. Recommended conditions have been included should the
proposal be approved.

The existing developments fronting on Smoke Ranch Road on either side of the
subject site provide landscape buffer widths in accordance with the UDC and flat
rooves with parapets instead of a gabled roof forms. Therefore, the proposal is
incompatible with adjacent development.
The proposal includes several landscape waivers which means the development
is not consistent with the UDC and the Wall and Buffer Standards.

The proposal includes two driveways off of Smoke Ranch, a Primary Arterial,
which is sufficient to handle the traffic associated with this use.
City;
Stucco, tile roofing and vinyl windows are typical building materials in the city, and
the landscape materials are appropriate for the region.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]

While not unsightly, the choice to use a gabled roof form adjacent to several
existing medical offices and a retail center that all have flat rooves with parapets is
incompatible with development in the area. Additionally, the lack of a distinct base
material to the architectural design and the inclusion of chain link fencing would
create an aesthetically displeasing development.
If approved, the project will be subject to building permit review and business
licensing requirements and ongoing inspection to assure it continues to operate
respective of public health, safety and welfare.

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (A-0015-84)
approximately 1,000 acres of property generally located east of Buffalo
Drive, west of Lorenzi Boulevard, between Cheyenne Avenue on the
09/05/84
north and Washington Avenue on the south. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval. The annexation
became effective on 12/06/84.
The City Council accepted the applicants request to withdraw without
prejudice a Special Use Permit (U-0010-99) for a Beer/Wine/Cooler
Off-Sale use in conjunction with a proposed general retail and car
wash building on property located at the northeast corner of Buffalo
Drive and Smoke Ranch Road. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial.
05/10/99
The City Council accepted the applicants request to withdraw without
prejudice a Special Use Permit (U-0011-99) for an Auto Repair
Garage, Minor use in conjunction with a proposed general retail and
car wash building on property located at the northeast corner of
Buffalo Drive and Smoke Ranch Road. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended denial.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]

A Rezoning (ZON-60372) from U(Undeveloped) to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) was approved by the City Council. The Planning
10/21/15 A Site Development Plan Review (SDR-60374) for an 80-bed
convalescent care facility/nursing home was approved by the City
Council. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
This entitlement was never exercised.
The Planning Commission voted (4-0) to hold SDR-68686 in abeyance
04/11/17 to the May 9, 2017 Planning Commission meeting at the request of the
applicant.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold SDR-68686 in abeyance
05/09/17 to the June 13, 2017 Planning Commission meeting at the request of
the applicant.


There are no related building permits or business licenses for this vacant site.
A preapplication meeting was held with the applicant with staff going
01/23/17
over the submittal requirements for a Site Development Plan Review.
Field Check
Staff completed a routine site visit, the site is vacant and free of debris,
03/02/17
with several temporary, political signs.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]

Site Area
Net Acres 2.22

Property District
19.12 Designation
Vacant
LI/R (Light C-PB (Planned
North Medical Office
Industrial/Research) Business Park)
Single Family ML (Medium Low R-CL (Single-Family
South
Dwellings Density Residential) Compact Lot)
LI/R (Light C-PB (Planned
East Medical Office
Industrial/Research) Business Park)
West Retail

Trails N/A
Assessment)

Min. Lot Size N/A 96,703 SF Y
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]

Min. Setbacks
Corner 10 Feet N/A Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings N/A N/A Y

Max. Building Height N/A 24 Feet Y
Screened,
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/ a Gated w/a Y
Roof or Trellis Roof/Trellis
Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance

3:1 proximity slope 72 Feet 180 Feet Y
Adjacent development matching
setback N/A 80 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure N/A 0 Feet Y

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 17 Trees 1 Trees *N
East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 14 Trees 14 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 57 Trees 41 Trees *N
10 Trees 10 Trees Y
spaces
*The applicant has requested a waiver to the perimeter landscape standards, the
request is detailed below.
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]


Min. Zone Width
West 8 Feet 2 Feet *N
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential N/A Y
*The applicant has requested a waiver to the perimeter landscape standards as detailed
below.

Governing
Document
Planned Streets and
Smoke Ranch
Primary Arterial Highways 100 Y
Road
Parking Requirement
Complian
Required Provided ce
Parking Parking
Use Gross Handi Handi
Parking
Floor Area Regula - Regula -
Ratio
or Number r cappe r cappe
of Units d d
Convalescent
Care Facility /
72 beds 1 to 10 beds 8
Nursing
Home
10 1 per
Employees 10
employees employee
Medical 3 for medical
3
Professionals professionals
PB
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685]
Parking Requirement
Complian
Required Provided ce
Parking Parking
Use Gross Handi Handi
Parking
Floor Area Regula - Regula -
Ratio
or Number r cappe r cappe
of Units d d
Loading
1 2 Y
Spaces
Waivers
An eight-foot wide landscape A zero-foot wide
buffer with trees spaced 20 landscape buffer with no
Denial
foot on center on the north trees on the north
property line property line.
A 15-foot wide landscape A 10-foot wide landscape
buffer on the south property buffer on portions of the Denial
line south property line.
Waivers
An eight-foot wide
landscape buffer with a
An eight-foot wide landscape parallel sidewalk that
buffer on the west property reduces the width for a Denial
line portion of the buffer to 2
feet on the west property
line.
An eight-foot wide landscape A six-foot wide landscape
buffer on the east property buffer on the east Denial
line property line
PB
SDR-68686

SDR-68686

SDR-68686
SDR-68686 - REVISED

SDR-68686 - REVISED

b777
7 7
7 7
777 A7 77777
777A
b77b
A777
77
A777
7A77b 7777
A
77A7 7 7
7
bA7 77777A7777
77 A7 A7bA7
777bA
bA 7AA
77AA777
A
AA77
7A7 A b b
7b7

7777 7
7 7
7777

b7
SDR-68686
7A
bA 777
7A
bA 777
7AA
77

77
77

77

A7A77A
bA 777
bA 7777 77A77 7A7 A7bA7
7bA77bA
bA7 77A7A7AA
A7 777 A 7 b7 7 77 7 b7 7
7b77 777777
77777 7
77 7
77777777

b7
SDR-68686
b7
7

7
7
7

b7
7

b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 7 7

b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

b7 b7 7b7b7 77 b7 77b7 b
7 7 7 7 7
7

b7
7

7

7
b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b b7 b7 b7 b7 b 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7

7
7
7b7

77 b77 A b77 7
7 7

7
7
7
7
b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7

b7 b
b
7

b7 7 7 77b7 b7 7 7A7b7
A b
b
b7

b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7

37

b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b b7 b7 b7
b b7
b b7
b b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7

7

7
b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 77 7

SDR-68686
b7

7 7 7
7

7 7
7 7

b7

7

b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 7
7

b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
b7 b7 7b7b7 b7 77b7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7
7

b7
7
7

7
7 7
7
b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7

A

77 b77 7b77 b77 7

7

7
7
7 b
7
b7 b7 b7
b7 7 b7 b b7 b7 b7 b7 b7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7
7 7
b7
7 b

7

77b7 b7 7A7b7 b7 b
b7 7 7
7 7
7 7 7 7
97
b b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
b

7

b7 b7 777 b7 b

7 7

bA 777777A77 C7A7 A7bA7
7bA77bA
bA7 77A7A7AA
A 777 A 7 b7 7 77 7 b7 7
7b77 777777 77777 7

77 7
77777777

b7
SDR-68686
7 7
7 7
777 A7 77777
777A
b77b
A777
77
A777
7A77b 7777
A
77A7 7 7
7
bA7 77777A7777
77 A7 A7bA7
777bA
bA 7AA
77AA777
A
AA77
7A7 A b b
7b7
7777

7

7 7

7777

b7
b
SDR-68686
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKET STREET
SUMMERLIN RE, LLC
7540 SMOKE RANCH ROAD
03/02/17
SDR-68686 [PRJ-68685] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKET STREET
SUMMERLIN RE, LLC
7540 SMOKE RANCH ROAD
03/02/17
777 77A7777 77777777777777777777
b77777 7 77777777777 7 b
7
A77
b77777
777
777
77 77
7 777b77A777
7 b777
7 7
7777b
7 b7 7 7 7 b7 7 A7 7 7
777777777777
7777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777
7777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777:777777
7777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
:7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
:777777777777
7:77777777777777
777777777
7b7
777
7 7A77b

7
SDR-68686 - REVISED

SUBJECT:
MOD-70292 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THE CALIDA
GROUP, LLC - OWNER: R A SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Major Modification of the Las Vegas Renaissance Master Development Plan and
Development Standards dated April 15, 2011 TO AMEND THE LAND USE PLAN AND THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS on 23.40 acres located at the southeast corner of Alta Drive
and Rampart Boulevard (APNs 138-32-312-013 and 138-32-723-003), PD (Planned
Development) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70123]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
2. Conditions and Staff Report - MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
3. Supporting Documentation - MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
4. Photo(s) - MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
6. Las Vegas Renaissance Master Development Plan and Development Standards - MOD-70292
and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123
7. Clark County School District - School Development Tracking Form - MOD-70292 and SDR-
70293 [PRJ-70123]
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: THE CALIDA GROUP, LLC - OWNER: R A
SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
MOD-70292 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
SDR-70293 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: MOD-70292
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 871 - MOD-70292

868 - SDR-70293
PROTESTS 10 - MOD-70292
10 - SDR-70293
APPROVALS 0 - MOD-70292
0 - SDR-70293
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Major Modification

(MOD-70292) shall be required.
herein.
6. A revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of

Planning Department, prior to the time application is made for a building permit, to
reflect conformance with the residential adjacency trash enclosure setback and a
minimum 15-foot-wide landscape buffer along the east property line.

Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device. The
technical landscape plan shall include the following changes from the conceptual
landscape plan: a minimum 15-foot wide landscape buffer along the east property
line.
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
Conditions Page Two
8. A Master Sign Plan shall be submitted for approval by the City of Las Vegas prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building on the site and prior
to the issuance of any sign permits.
10. A Comprehensive Construction Staging Plan shall be submitted to the Department

of Planning for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The Construction Staging Plan shall include the following information: Design and
location of construction trailer(s); design and location of construction fencing; all
proposed temporary construction signage; location of materials staging area; and
the location and design of parking for all construction workers.
future building permit applications related to the site.
Public Works
13. Prior to issuance of permits, grant a Public Pedestrian Access Easement for all
public sidewalks, if any, located outside of the public right-of-way.
14. Concurrent with the closure of the existing driveway on Alta Drive, reconstruct the
existing right turn/deceleration lane to meet the geometric intent of Standard
Drawing #234.1 and grant the appropriate Public Roadway Easement that matches
the engineered solution, unless otherwise allowed by the City Traffic Engineer.
15. Concurrent with onsite development, dedicate and construct a right

turn/deceleration lane on Alta Drive. This condition shall not be imposed if the
required Traffic Impact Analysis determines that it is not required.
16. In accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56, remove all substandard
offsite improvements and unused driveways and replace with new improvements
meeting Current City Standards concurrent with development of this site. All
existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
17. Prior to submittal of civil improvement drawings, meet with the Sanitary Sewer
Section of the Department of Public Works for requirements to reroute the existing
onsite private sewer service to other parcels and to determine an appropriate
connection point for this site to the public sewer in Alta Drive.
18. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets
concurrent with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend
from the sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway
network and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.
21. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the Alta
Drive public right-of-way, if any, prior to the issuance of permits for these
improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property within the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right-of-way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to
the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (229-4836).
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to revise the development standards for the Las Vegas
Renaissance Master Development Plan and Development Standards which regulates
development of the vacant property on the southeast corner of Alta Drive and Rampart
Boulevard. The applicant is also proposing to construct a 359-unit multi-family
residential complex on the east portion of that property.
ISSUES
A Major Modification (MOD-70292) is proposed to revise the Las Vegas

Renaissance Master Development Plan and Development Standards.
The proposed revisions to the development standards rely heavily on Title 19 for
specific requirements, but allow flexibility in the uses allowed.
The majority of the specific standards of development will be set at time of Site
Development Plan Review for each portion of the sites development.
A parcel map was recorded on March 24, 2017 which divided the subject site into
two parcels, the western portion being approximately 7.8 acres and the eastern
portion being approximately 15.6 acres.
A Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70293) has been requested for the eastern
15.6 acres for a 359-unit multi-family residential development.
ANALYSIS
The subject site is zoned PD (Planned Development) and guided for SC (Service
Commercial) development. Development of the site is governed by the Las Vegas
Renaissance Master Development Plan and Development Standards.
The applicant is proposing a Major Modification (MOD-70292) to those development

standards to allow an increase in the residential portion of the mixed use development
previously approved for the site among other changes. Planned Developments are
governed by Title 19.10.040, which requires the development standards to contain
specific elements. The applicant has provided a revised document that satisfies those
requirements.
The revised development standards propose that the uses be governed mostly by the
uses of the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, with exceptions to specifically
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
allow multi-family residential; and movie, live theater and event center by right, and
taverns by special use permit. The proposed permitted uses are appropriate for a
mixed-use development of this nature. The revised standards would allow density of up
to 300,000 square feet of retail, commercial, office, medical, employment and/or
entertainment and residential at a density equal to the H (High Density Residential) land
use designation. The H (High Density Residential) designation does not include a
specific limitation to the density of development. The proposed apartment complex
(SDR-70293) would therefore be a permitted use and conform to the density allowed if
the revised development standards are adopted.
Building setbacks (and building heights) are mainly determined by residential adjacency
standards which are adopted by way of reference, but the revised development
standards also specifically call out a 15-foot setback to the existing parking structure on
the adjacent parcel and a 5-foot setback to external property lines with a recognition
that buildings closer than 15 feet to Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard must be
designed to be sensitive to the pedestrian environment. The proposed setbacks are
appropriate for a mixed-use development of this nature. The proposed apartment
complex (SDR-70293) adheres to the setback requirements (and therefore to the
residential adjacency requirements as well).
The revised development standards provide access to the entire site via the existing
signalized intersection on Alta Drive, the existing driveway from Rampart Boulevard on
the property adjacent to the south, a future right in/right out on Rampart Boulevard
(between the previously mentioned existing drive and the intersection with Alta Drive),
and through the existing development to the south (Boca Park, All Phases). An updated
traffic study may be required by the Department of Public Works as needed. The
proposed apartment complex (SDR-70293) will have its main access off the Alta Drive
signalized intersection but will have secondary access points to the west and south to
meet the requirements of the Department of Fire and Rescue.
The revised development standards include the parking requirements of Title 19.12 and
19.18 by reference, and include an allowance for a parking structure on the site in the
future. The proposed apartment complex (SDR-70293) provides a slight excess in
parking with 595 parking spaces where 574 are required.
The revised development standards dictate that the majority of landscaping standards
be established at the time of Site Development Plan Review for each portion of the site
as they develop. Specific requirements are included for a buffer zone of 125 feet along
the Tuscany Hills II subdivision, one of the single family residential development to the
east. In addition, a 15-foot-wide landscape setback is required adjacent to the West
Mesa Estates I subdivision. The specific landscaping of the buffer zone and landscape
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
setback is to be established at time of Site Development Plan Review. The proposed

apartment complex (SDR-70293) includes a double row of trees along the eastern edge
of the 125-foot buffer, with three additional rows of trees to increase the visual screen.
The 15-foot-wide landscape setback is not provided adjacent to the West Mesa Estates
I subdivision and a condition of approval requires that the plans be revised prior to
issuance of a building permit. The buffer provided is only 11 feet in width, but does
provide an appropriate level of landscape materials, including a row of perimeter trees.
The remaining property lines to the south, southwest and north all have a row of
perimeter trees, and there are parking lot trees in every parking lot finger. There is
additional landscaping amenities surrounding the buildings swimming pool areas which
are both located over 100 feet from the east property line; and at the main entrance
point from Alta Drive.
The revised development standards dictate that the majority of the architectural design
standards be established at the time of Site Development Plan Review for each portion
of the site as they develop. A specific allowance is made for a potential tower element
(not to exceed 150 feet in height) as a beacon for the development. The revised
development standards also include some purely conceptual drawings. The proposed
apartment complex is to be constructed mainly of stucco, with wrought iron railings,
metal louvres, and roof forms of both flat roofs with parapets and standing seam roofing.
The proposed facades include color and roof form changes that break up the
appearance, as does the stepping back of the building height to comply with residential
adjacency requirements.
The revised development standards dictate that a Master Sign Plan be approved prior
to the issuance of any sign permits, but specifies that a pylon sign may be located on
both Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard with the same height and size of the approved,
existing pylon sign on the north side of Alta Drive at Tivoli Village.
students would be generated by the proposed development on this site. Of the three
schools serving the area (Jacobson Elementary School, Walter Johnson Middle School
and Palo Verde High School), the District notes that Jacobson Elementary and Palo
Verde High are over capacity for the 2016-2017 school year, and no new schools are
planned in this area at this time.
The revised Las Vegas Renaissance Master Development Plan and Development
Standards defer to Title 19 on a number of development standards and allow the
majority of other standards to be established at the time of Site Development Plan
Review which will be reviewed by the City Council. Furthermore, the proposed
apartment complex (SDR-70293) conforms to the proposed development standards and
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
provides a sensitive and appropriate transition from the single family residential to the
east to the commercial shopping centers in the area. Therefore, staff recommends
approval of the Major Modification (MOD-70292) and the Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-70293), with conditions.
FINDINGS (MOD-70292)
In order to approve a Major Modification application, pursuant to Title 19.10.040(G), the

Planning Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
The General Plan guides this site for SC (Service Commercial) which allows
mixed-use development such as what is being proposed with this project.
districts.
The uses allowed by the revised development standards will be compatible with
the surrounding land uses and zoning districts because of the requirement to
adhere to the residential adjacency standards and buffering of the residential
properties to the east.
The site is already zoned PD (Planned Development) and the revised

development standards will amend the commercial density of the site to better
reflect the development factors in the community.

Alta Drive is a 80-foot-wide major collector and Rampart Boulevard is a 100-foot-

wide primary arterial and will be adequate in size to meet the requirements of the
proposed revisions to the development standards.
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]

The proposed multi-family development will provide an appropriate transition

between the single family residential to the east and the proposed development
on the west portion of this site as well as the existing shopping centers to the north
and south.
The proposed multi-family residential development is regulated by the Las Vegas

Renaissance Master Development Plan and Development Standard, which were
adopted by the City Council. The proposed development is consistent with those
development standards (as amended).

The proposed access points on both Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard, and the
internal circulation system which will connect to the existing shopping center to the
south will not negatively impact the adjacent roadways. The proposed project
would raise Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard to be at about 47 and 86 percent of
capacity respectively.
City;
The materials proposed for the apartment complex buildings and landscaping are
appropriate based on the revised development standards and are consistent with
development in the area.

PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
The proposed building design for the apartment complex provide step backs from
the adjacent single family residential which allows conformance to the residential
adjacency requirements and increases the visual interest of the buildings.
The proposed apartment complex will be subject to building permit review,

construction inspection and licensing requirements to assure that they continue to
protect the public health, safety and general welfare.

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0030-92) from C-1 (Limited
Commercial), C-2 (General Commercial) and R-1 (Single Family
Residential) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) and R-1 (Single Family
Residential) on approximately 105 acres generally located on the east
09/02/92 side of Rampart Boulevard between Charleston Boulevard and Alta
Drive, which included the subject site. The item included requests for
approval of a 103-acre regional mall and a two-acre single family
residential development. The Planning Commission and staff
In an official Writ of Mandate from the Clark County District Court, the
conditions of approval for Z-0030-92 were modified to (A) extend the
Resolution of Intent from 12 months to 24 months; (B) restrict delivery
access from local streets; (C) restrict special events on the exterior of
the mall to no more than 10 days per year; (D) stipulate that
12/31/92 development of each pad site would only be subject to standard city
requirements and procedures; (E) stipulate that the Regional Mall shall
be permitted to contain 1.1 million square feet of building area; (F)
require conformance to the plot plan as amended by the court order;
and (G) stipulate that the applicant shall not be required to provide
land for future fire and police facilities.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0012-98) from U
(Undeveloped) [SC (Service Commercial) General Plan Designation]
under Resolution of Intent to C-1 (Limited Commercial) to PD (Planned
04/27/98 Development) on 47.4 acres at the southeast corner of Alta Drive and
Rampart Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended
approval; staff recommended denial. This action established
development standards for the Peccole Town Center Master Plan area
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]

as well as the shopping area to the south, designating the southern 49
acres (zoned C-1) as Phase I and the northern 47 acres (zoned PD)
as Phase II. The site plan for Phase II included a five-story non-
gaming hotel, 650-seat amphitheater, 592,800 square-feet of
retail/office uses, 125 condominium units and two parking garages.
92(5)] for a proposed 433,240 square-foot retail Shopping Center,
including 21 retail pad sites, on 48.7 acres at the northeast corner of
Rampart Boulevard and Charleston Boulevard (Phase I). This was not
a Major Amendment of the Rezoning case (Z-0030-92), but instead
replaced that approved plan.
Planning and Development Department staff administratively approved
a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0030-92(16)] for a proposed
10/23/00
10,386 square-foot furniture store within the Phase II portion of the
Boca Park Shopping Center site.
98(1)] for a proposed 723,150 square-foot retail and office
development (Boca Park Phase II) on 41.53 acres at the southeast
corner of Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard. This plan replaced the
plan approved as part of Z-0012-98. (The applicant from this point
forward refers to the Phase II area located at the southeast corner of
Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard as Phase III.) The Planning
11/01/00
The City Council approved a Major Modification [Z-0012-98(2)] of the
Peccole Town Center Master Development Plan and Development
Standards to add additional development standards pertaining to
Phase II. (The applicant from this point forward refers to the Phase II
area located at the southeast corner of Alta Drive and Rampart
Boulevard as Phase III.)
The City Council approved a Master Sign Plan [Z-0012-98(3)] for the
Boca Park Phase III area, located at the southeast corner of Alta Drive
04/18/01
and Rampart Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff
a Minor Amendment of a previously approved Site Development Plan
06/21/01 Review [Z-0012-98(1)] for a proposed 626,005 square-foot
development where 723,150 square feet was approved at the
southeast corner of Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard.
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]

a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0012-98(4)] for a proposed 50,750
11/06/01 square-foot retail shell building and a 23,047 square-foot retail shell
building on a portion of 41.87 acres adjacent to the east side of
Rampart Boulevard, approximately 1,200 feet south of Alta Drive.
A one-lot Parcel Map (PMP-41307) on 23.4 acres at the southeast
04/18/11 corner of Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard that constitutes the
subject site was recorded.
A Rezoning from PD (Planned Development) to PD (Planned
06/15/11 Development) (ZON-41312) was approved by the City Council. Staff
and the Planning Commission recommended approval.
A Site Development Plan Review for a three-story, 773,000 square
foot shopping center, four-story parking garage, and six-story, 100-unit
06/15/11 multi-family residential development (SDR- 41313) was approved by
the City Council. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended
approval.
An Extension of Time (EOT-52982) for a three-story, 773,000 square
foot shopping center, four-story parking garage, and six-story, 100-unit
05/21/14
multi-family residential development (SDR-41313) was approved by
the City Council. Staff recommended approval.


A building permit (#01004042) was issued for rough grading on 42
03/12/01 acres at 8855 Alta Drive. A final inspection was not approved and
the permit expired 10/06/01.
A building permit (#01010316) was issued for onsite water, sewer
06/07/01 and fire improvements at 8855 Alta Drive. A final inspection was not
approved and the permit expired 11/16/02.
A building permit (#010101358) was issued for onsite improvements
06/22/01 and hardscapes at 680 South Rampart Boulevard. A final inspection
was not approved and the permit expired 06/15/02.
A building permit (#01011357) was issued for a parking structure and
06/22/01 perimeter landscaping at 680 South Rampart Boulevard. A final
inspection was approved on 03/25/02.
A building permit (#07002034) was issued for a new ramp for an
06/21/07 existing parking garage at 680 South Rampart Boulevard. A final
inspection was approved on 09/24/07.
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]
Staff held a pre-application with the applicant, discussing the submittal
requirements for a Major Modification to the existing development
02/21/17 standards and a Site Development Plan Review for a multi-family
residential development. Several follow-up meetings were held to
review the proposed development standards prior to submittal.
Field Check
Staff completed a routine site visit, observing vacant development
05/04/14
parcels surrounded by construction fencing.

Site Area
Net Acres 23.4

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject SC (Service PD (Planned
Vacant
Property Commercial) Development)
GC (General C-2 (General
North Mixed Use
SC (Service PD (Planned
Commercial) Development)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Single Family L (Low Density
East RPD-4 (Residential
Dwellings Residential)
Planned Development
4 Units per Acre)
Golf Course
M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
West (Approved for
Residential) Residential)
Apartments)
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]

PD (Planned Development) District *Y
Trails Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/A
* The proposed Major Modification (MOD-70292) would establish new development
standards for the Las Vegas Renaissance Master Plan.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (SDR-70293)
Pursuant to the Revised Las Vegas Renaissance Master Development Plan and
Development Standards, the following standards apply:
Min. Lot Size N/A 7.8 Acres Y
Min. Lot Width N/A 320 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Corner 5 Feet N/A Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings N/A 58 Feet Y
Max. Building Height 3:1 slope 3:1 slope Y
Screened,
Gated, w/a
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or
Roof or Trellis Trellis
Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance

3:1 proximity slope 100 Feet 100 Feet Y
Adjacent development matching
setback 40 Feet 89 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 100 Feet Y
PB
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293 [PRJ-70123]

Governing
Document
Planned Streets and
Alta Drive Major Collector Highways Map 80 Y
Planned Streets and

Rampart
Primary Arterial Highways Map 100 Y
Boulevard
Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Number Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
of Units capped capped
Multi-Family
One Bedroom 237 1.25 per unit 297
Two Bedroom 110 1.75 per unit 193
Three Bedroom 12 2 per unit 24
1 guest
Total Units 359 space per 6 60
units
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 562 12 585 10 *N
*A condition of approval is included that requires handicapped parking to be provided in
accordance with the requirements of Title 19.08 and 19.12.
PB
MOD-70292
MOD-70292
MOD-70292
MOD-70292
7

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

7 7 7
Ab7 bA
A777 777

7
77
MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

7

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

7

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

7

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

77

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

7

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

7

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292

MOD-70292
MOD-70292 [PRJ-70123] - MAJOR MODIFICATION RELATED TO SDR-70293 - APPLICANT: THE CALIDA GROUP,
LLC - OWNER: R A SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND RAMPART BOULEVARD
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

MOD-70292 and SDR-70293

SUBJECT:
SDR-70293 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MOD-70292 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: THE CALIDA GROUP, LLC - OWNER: R A SOUTHEAST
LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review
FOR A 359-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 15.60 acres located
adjacent to the south side of Alta Drive, 300 feet east of Rampart Boulevard (APN 138-32-723-
003), PD (Planned Development) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-70123]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.


RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SDR-70293
SDR-70293
SDR-70293

SDR-70293

SDR-70293

SDR-70293

SDR-70293

SDR 70293
The Calida Group, LLC
S side of Alta Drive, E of Rampart Boulevard

Proposed 359 unit multi-family residential development.
Proposed Development
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6.65 2,387

AM Peak Hour APARTMENT [DWELL] 359 0.51 183

Alta Drive
Rampart Boulevard

Alta Drive 35,490
Rampart Boulevard 53,445
This project will add approximately 2,387 trips per day on Alta Dr. and Rampart Blvd. Currently, Alta is at about 40 percent
of capacity and Rampart is at about 81 percent of capacity. With this project, Alta is expected to be at about 47 percent of
capacity and Rampart to be at about 86 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 233 additional cars, or about four every minute.
SDR-70293

SDR-70293

SUBJECT:
ZON-70263 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC -
OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning
FROM: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.05
acres at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099,
100, 101 and 120), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-70267
and SDR-70269 [PRJ-69851]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-
70267, VAC-70268 and SDR-70269 [PRJ-69851]
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-
70267, VAC-70268 and SDR-70269 [PRJ-69851]
4. Photo(s) - ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-70267, VAC-70268 and
SDR-70269 [PRJ-69851]
5. Justification Letter - ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-70267, VAC-
70268 and SDR-70269 [PRJ-69851]
ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-70267, VAC-70268 and SDR-
70269 [PRJ-69851]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR
CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-70263 Staff recommends DENIAL.
VAR-70264 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

ZON-70263
conditions:
ZON-70263
VAR-70264
conditions:
ZON-70263
SUP-70266 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-70264
ZON-70263
SUP-70267
SUP-70266
ZON-70263
VAC-70268 conditions: VAR-70265
SUP-70266
SUP-70267
ZON-70263
SDR-70269
SUP-70266
SUP-70267
VAC-70268
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Notification Page One
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 451 - ZON-70263 and VAR-70264

451 - VAR-70265 and SUP-70266
451 - SUP-70267
7 - VAC-70268
451 - SDR-70269
PROTESTS 0 - ZON-70263 and VAR-70264

0 - VAR-70265 and SUP-70266
0 - SUP-70267
0 - VAC-70268
0 - SDR-70269
APPROVALS 0 - ZON-70263 and VAR-70264

0 - VAR-70265 and SUP-70266
0 - SUP-70267
0 - VAC-70268
0 - SDR-70269
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (ZON-

70263), Variance (VAR-70265), Special Use Permit (SUP-70266), Special Use
Permit (SUP-70267), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70269), and Vacation
(VAC-70268) shall be required, if approved.
Planning

Permit (SUP-70267), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70269), and Vacation
(VAC-70268) shall be required, if approved.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Conditions Page Two
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for the Mixed
Use use.

70263), Variance (VAR-70264), Variance (VAR-70265), Special Use Permit (SUP-
70267), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70269), and Vacation (VAC-70268)
application.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Lounge
Bar use.

70266), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70269), and Vacation (VAC-70268)

separation from a church and an 80-foot distance separation from a school where
400 feet is required.
application.
license.
9. The communications monopole and its associated equipment and facility shall be
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
VAC-70268 CONDITIONS
1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the entire width of the alley west of
Maryland Parkway extending north from Lewis Avenue approximately 125 feet.
2. Concurrent with the recordation of the Order of Vacation, record a 20-foot wide
alley or Public Roadway Easement extending from the proposed terminus of the
vacation, east to Maryland Parkway. The final layout of the area vacated shall
accommodate minimum turning radii for a SU-30 design vehicle. If the site is being
remapped, the mapping action shall include the required public alley dedication or
Roadway Easement and the Order of Vacation shall record concurrent with the
mapping action.
3. Prior to recordation of the Order of Vacation, coordinate the relocation of all utilities
within the portion to be vacated. Alternatively, if approved by the utility companies,
this Petition of Vacation shall be amended to retain easements for the various
utility companies.
4. Prior to recordation of the Order of Vacation, meet with the Flood Control Section
of the Department of Public Works. This condition may be accomplished when the
applicant meets with Flood Control regarding SDR-70269.
5. Prior to recordation of the Order of Vacation, a sewer abandonment and relocation

plan shall be approved, bonded and permitted for construction.
6. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation
application are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the
recordation of an Order of Vacation. Existing public streetlights, if any, shall be
removed and returned to the City yard. Alternatively, the streetlights may remain if
the applicant disconnects them from public electrical service and installs a new
private electrical service to energize the lights. Such reassignment of streetlights
shall be coordinated with the Traffic Electrical Field Operations (TEFO) section of
the Department of Public Works.
7. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval
have been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public
improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient
security for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance
of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if
necessary because of technical concerns or because of other related review
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Conditions Page Five
actions as long as current City right of way requirements are still complied with and
the intent of the vacation application is not changed. If applicable, a five-foot wide
easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all
vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated and
available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public easement
corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any right-
of-way or easement being vacated must be retained.
8. All utility installations and mechanical equipment shall be located and screened per
Title 19 standards.
9. Reservation of easements for the facilities of the various utility companies together
with reasonable ingress thereto and egress there from shall be provided if
required.
10. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design
standards of all City Departments.
11. If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the
City of Las Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director,
then approval will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.
Planning

70266), Special Use Permit (SUP-70267), and Vacation (VAC-70268) shall be
required, if approved.
3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan dated 05/30/17,
landscape plan, and building elevations date stamped 04/27/17, and floor plans
dated 04/24/17 and 05/30/17 except as amended by conditions herein.
4. All utility and mechanical equipment shall be screened per Title 19.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
5. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer
area along portions of the east, south and west property lines where 15 feet is
required, a zero-foot landscape buffer area along portions of north property where
eight feet is required, and to allow zero perimeter trees where 34 are required.
Landscaping shall be installed within the right-of-way as shown on the approved
landscape plan.

11. Prospective buyers shall be informed that views may be obscured by future
adjacent development and this information shall be included in project CC & Rs.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Conditions Page Seven
Public Works
14. A Petition of Vacation, such as VAC-70268, shall record to eliminate right-of-way in

conflict with the proposed building, prior to the issuance of permits for this site or
the recordation of a map, whichever may occur first.
any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and construct all incomplete
improvements (streetlights) on adjacent public streets concurrent with development
of this site. Sidewalk paths along 11th Street, Lewis Avenue and Maryland
Parkway must comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. All
existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
16. Dedicate a 10-foot radius the northeast corner of 11th Street and Lewis Avenue
and a 10-foot radius at the northwest corner of Maryland Parkway and Lewis
Avenue prior to the issuance of any permits as required by the Department of
Public Works.
18. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the
Maryland Parkway, Lewis Avenue, and 11th Street public rights-of-way prior to the
issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an
insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the
City, the applicant shall remove property within the public right-of-way at the
applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The
installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right-of-way
shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the
property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate
all requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development Section of
the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).
19. Prior to the submittal of any civil improvement drawings, meet with the Sanitary
Sewer Planning Section of the Department of Public Works to determine an
acceptable connection point to the public sewer interceptors in Clark Avenue.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Conditions Page Eight
20. One onsite parking spot shall be designated as a pick up and drop off spot for
Transportation Service Providers (TSP). No parking is allowed within alley right-of-
way or Public Roadway Easements on this site. The final geometry of the relocated
alley shall accommodate minimum turning radii for a SU-30 design vehicle.
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
permits, or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a proposed 15-story mixed-use development consisting of 193

residential units and 28,817 square feet of commercial space at the northwest corner of
Lewis Avenue and Maryland Parkway.
ISSUES
Rezoning is requested from R-4 (High Density Residential) to C-1 (Limited

Commercial) on this site. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Variance is requested to allow 307 parking spaces where 359 spaces are
required. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Variance is requested to allow zero-foot front and corner side yard setbacks where
10 feet is required, a five-foot side yard setback where 10 feet is required and a five-
foot rear yard setback where 20 feet is required in the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district. Staff recommends denial of the request.
Mixed-Use is a conditional use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The
applicant cannot meet Conditional use regulation 4 for this use, which requires
parking structures to be located away from the street frontages and screened from
view of adjacent rights-of-way. Therefore, a Special Use Permit is required and staff
recommends denial of the request.
The Lounge Bar use is permitted in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with
approval of a Special Use Permit. A Waiver is requested to allow this use within 400
feet of two existing Church/House of Worships and two Schools. Staff does not
recommend the waiver request and therefore recommends denial of the Special Use
Permit request.
In conjunction with the Site Development Plan Review, perimeter landscape waivers
are being requested to allow zero feet of buffer area along portions of all property
lines, and to allow zero street/perimeter trees where 34 are required. Staff
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
ANALYSIS
Rezoning
The subject site is located within the Revitalization Area of the 2020 Master Plan, the
Founders District of the Downtown Master Plan, and the Las Vegas Redevelopment
area. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from R-4 (High Density Residential) to C-1
(Limited Commercial) in order to accommodate a wider range of permissible uses for
the proposed mixed-use tower.
The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district will permit commercial uses that are not
appropriate for an area that is predominantly developed with low-intensity office and
multi-family residential units. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the vision
outlined by the Downtown Master Plan as this area is intended to be a transitional area
between the Fremont East and Founders District Urban Hubs. The C-1 (Limited
Commercial) district will also allow for certain development standards, such as unlimited
building height, that are too permissive for this location.
The existing R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning district allows for mixed-use
development with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Retaining the existing R-4
(High Density Residential) district is preferable to a rezoning to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) as it allows all uses in a mixed-use development that are allowed by-right
in the P-O (Professional Office), O (Office) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
districts with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Uses not permitted by-right (i.e.
conditional uses and uses requiring a Special Use Permit) would not be allowed as
those commercial uses tend to be more intense and are incompatible in locations that
have similar development patterns as the subject site.
Retaining the existing zoning would give the City Council discretion regarding the
introduction of commercial uses into an area currently developed with residential and
low-intensity office uses. Retaining the R-4 designation would also limit building height
and allow for development standards that are more in character with the surrounding
neighborhood, as well as keeping with the vision of the Downtown Master Plan. While
the existing MXU (Mixed Use) Redevelopment Plan land use designation is consistent
with the requested C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, staff recommends denial of
the request as the uses and development standards associated with the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district are not appropriate for this location.
Site Development Plan Review

The request is for a 15-story mixed-use development consisting of 193 residential units
and 28,817 square feet of commercial space at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue
and Maryland Parkway. The site is currently developed with an operating multi-family
apartment complex.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
The site receives access via drives from Maryland Parkway and 11th street. Maryland
Parkway is an 80-foot collector and is adequate in size to serve the needs of the
development. 11th Street, however, is only 35 feet wide and mostly serves the
surrounding residential and professional office uses. There is concern that queuing
may be an issue on a 35-foot street for ingress and egress into a 307 space parking
garage; however, a determination cannot be definitively made until the traffic study has
been completed.
The subject site does not meet the required setbacks for the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district. A companion Variance has been requested to allow zero-foot front and
corner side-yard setbacks where 10 feet is required, a five-foot side-yard setback where
10 feet is required, and a five-foot rear-yard setback where 20 feet is required. Staff has
recommended denial of the request and a detailed analysis can be reviewed in the
Variance Findings section of this report.
On-site parking is provided within a nine-story, 307 space parking garage. 15 percent
of the proposed parking spaces are identified as compact, and one level of parking is
proposed below grade. Using the mixed-use alternative parking standards identified in
Title 19.18, the combination of proposed uses requires 359 parking spaces. The site is
deficient by 57 spaces, which is a 14 percent deviation from the amount required by
code. A companion Variance has been requested to provide relief from this
requirement and staff recommends denial. A detailed analysis can be reviewed in the
The floor plans indicate a mix of commercial and residential uses within the 15-story
building. The commercial uses identified on the ground floor include a 3,352 square-
foot clinic and a 19,437 square-foot community recreational facility. The commercial
spaces have direct access to the pedestrian way where the building faces street
frontage. A 6,028 square-foot lounge bar is proposed on the 11th floor. 73 one-
bedroom and 170 two-bedroom units are located on floors 2-14. A pool deck and
resident amenity area is located on the 9th floor. A Special Use permit has been
submitted to allow the lounge bar and staff has recommended denial. A detailed
analysis can be reviewed in the Special Use Permit section of this report.
The landscaping for the site is unique in that the proposed landscaping is primarily
located within the public right-of-way rather than on-site. As there is minimal buffering
and zero street trees physically located on the site, waivers have been requested to
allow zero feet of landscape buffer along portions of the north, south, east and west
property lines, and zero perimeter trees where 34 are required.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
The landscaped amenity areas provided within the public right-of-way are intended to
serve as the sites perimeter landscape buffer. The plan depicts a seven-foot detached
sidewalk and six-foot landscape buffer along the east property line, an 11-foot detached
sidewalk and a 12-foot landscape area along the south property line, and a nine-foot
detached sidewalk and an eight-foot landscaped area along the west property line. The
landscaped areas are planted with 24-inch Chinese Pistache and Heritage Live Oaks
spaced 20 feet on-center. There are several planter areas that are located both on
private and public property along the east, south and west property lines. These areas
vary in width between six and 15 feet, and are planted with various five-gallon shrubs.
There is no landscaping being provided along the north property line.
While amenity zone landscaping is being provided in the right-of-way along the east,
south, and west property lines, the landscape waivers cannot be justified as the
depicted landscape areas are not consistent with the development standards usually
associated with either off-site amenity zones in the nearby Downtown Centennial Plan
area, or the perimeter buffering dictated by Title 19. In addition, no buffering or
perimeter trees are being provided along the north property line, and as such staff
recommends denial of the landscape waiver requests.
The site elevations depict a 15-story mixed-use building and an attached nine-story
parking garage. Ground level glazing is utilized for the commercial storefronts, and the
residential floors utilize construction materials that include metal panels, columns, and
railings. The lounge bar is framed with an accented metal to differentiate it from the
remainder of the structure. The building utilizes architectural features such as canopies,
pop-outs and building relief to provide visual interest for each building face. While the
parking garage is partially screened by metal screens, it is located along the 11th Street
and Maryland Parkway street frontages, which does not meet the Conditional Use
Permit requirements for a Mixed Use development in a C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district. Due to non-compliance with this provision, a companion Special Use
Permit has been requested to provide relief from this requirement. Staff has
recommended denial of the request, and the specific analysis can be found in the
Special Use Permit section of this report.
While mixed-use development is generally encouraged within the downtown core, the
scale of the proposal is inappropriate for an area predominately developed with
residential, professional office, and other low intensity uses. A 15-story building is not
compatible with the surrounding single-story and low-rise development in the area, and
the site is located outside of the Fremont East and Founders District mixed-use hubs as
identified by the Downtown Master Plan. The need for setback variances and
landscape waivers indicate that the site is being overbuilt and not appropriate for this
location. A 15-story tower will be out of scale with the existing development in the area,
and will be too intense for this transitional portion of downtown. Staff recommends
denial of the Site Development Plan Review and all associated waivers.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Special Use Permit (SUP-70266)
Mixed-Use is defined as The vertical integration of residential uses and commercial or

civic uses within a single building or a single development, where the uses share
pedestrian access, vehicular access, parking functions, or any combination thereof.
The proposed development meets the definition of Mixed-Use as it will contain both on-
site commercial and residential uses.
The Conditional Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
1. Residential uses permitted as of right in the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts
are permitted as conditional uses within a C-1 or C-2 Zoning.
The subject sites proposed zoning is C-1 and the project is in conformance with
this requirement.
2. Commercial uses or civic uses shall at a minimum be located at the ground

level fronting the primary public rights-of-way and may extend beyond the
ground floor. The principal entryway to access those uses, whether
individually or collectively, shall be directly accessed from and oriented to
the public sidewalk.
The floor plans indicate that the anticipated commercial uses will be located on
the ground floor and will be accessible from the public sidewalk as required.
3. Residential uses shall not be permitted on the ground floor fronting on

primary public rights-of-way, but may be located at or above the second
level of the building. Residential uses may be located on the ground floor
of any building or portion thereof that is located at the interior of the
development site and does not front on an arterial or collector street.
The floor plans do not indicate any residential uses on the ground level.
4. Surface parking lots shall be located to the side or the rear of the principal
building(s) on the site, and shall be screened from view of the adjacent
rights-of-way by the principal building(s) or a landscape buffer in
conformance with the requirements of LVMC Chapter 19.08. Parking
structures shall not be located along the street frontages of the
development site, but shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-
way by the principal building(s).
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
There are parking structures located along the street frontages and they are not
screened by the principal building. The Mixed-Use is typically a conditional use
permit within the C-1 zoning district; however, a Special Use Permit is required
as the proposal does not meet this condition.
The proposed 15-story mixed-use building is not compatible with the surrounding single-
story and low-rise development in the area. The proposed development is inappropriate
for an area predominately developed with low-rise residential, professional office, and
other low intensity uses. A Special Use Permit is being requested because the
development does not meet the Conditional Use Requirement that prohibits the parking
structure from being located along the street frontage, which further exemplifies the
incompatibility of the development at this location. Staff recommends denial of the
request.
The Lounge Use is defined as A bar located in a lounge area of a hotel or approved
mixed-use building which has a minimum of 150 rooms or residential units, unless the
City Council determines that public health, safety and welfare are not compromised by a
lesser number of rooms or units, where the lounge bar makes available alcoholic
beverages for consumption in specified areas only. This use does not include a bar that
is ancillary to a Non-restricted Gaming Establishment, as defined in this Title. The
proposed development meets the definition of the Lounge Use as the proposed mixed-
use development has 193 residential units.
1. No lounge bar business use shall be located within 400 feet of any
church/house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more
than 12 children or City park.
There are two churches and two schools within 400 feet of the proposed use.
The applicant has requested a waiver to allow the Lounge Use approximately 70
feet from an existing church located to the west of the subject site, and from a
school located approximately 80 feet to the east of the subject site.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the minimum

distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference
to the shortest distance between two property lines, one being the property
line of the proposed lounge bar which is closest to the existing use to
which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line of
that existing use which is closest to the proposed lounge bar. The distance
shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles.
For purposes of measurement, the term property line refers to property
lines of fee interest parcels and does not include the property line of:
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for
on-site parking and which has been created so as to avoid the
distance limitation described in Requirement 1.
All measurements from the protected uses have been measured in accordance
with this requirement.
3. In the case of a proposed lounge bar located on a parcel of at least 80

acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be
measured in a straight line from the nearest property line of the existing
use to the nearest portion of the structure in which the lounge bar will be
located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
The site is under 80 acres in size, and therefore this requirement does not apply.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for a lounge bar which
also requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the
Planning Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and
shall, as part of its recommendation to the City Council, state whether the
distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support of the
decision.
This use permit and associated waiver request will be considered by the
Planning Commission on June 13, 2017.

establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection
with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992, or in
connection with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after
July 1, 1992.
The site does not have a non-restricted gaming license and therefore this
requirement does not apply.
6. Where associated with a hotel use, alcoholic beverages shall be served and
consumed only within the lounge bar area, within a pool area, or within
hotel rooms as incident to room service. Where associated with a mixed-
use building, alcoholic beverages shall be served and consumed only
within the lounge bar area.
Business licensing regulations and inspections will mandate compliance with all
requirements for a Lounge within a mixed-use building.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
7. The maximum available customer seating in the lounge bar area shall not
exceed 50 seats. *
The floor plan indicates less than 50 seats in the lounge bar. In addition,
business licensing regulations will mandate compliance with the maximum
seating provisions.
8. No gaming-related use may be allowed in the lounge bar area.
There is no gaming proposed within the lounge.
9. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the

provisions of LVMC Chapter 6.50.
Business licensing regulations and inspections will mandate compliance with the
The Lounge use cannot be conducted in a manner that harmonious and compatible with
existing surrounding land uses as distance separation waivers are being requested to
allow the use within 400 feet of two churches and two schools. The table below
indicates the location and distance from the protected uses:
Protected Use Location Distance from Subject Site

Church 318 S. 11th Street 70 ft.
Church 301 S. Maryland Parkway 80 ft.
School 301 S. Maryland Parkway 80 ft.
School 323 S. 13th Street 240 ft.
Due to the number of protected uses within the 400-foot distance separation radius,
staff recommends denial of the request.

The proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district is in conformance with the
MXU (Mixed Use) Redevelopment Plan land use designation.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
districts.
The surrounding land uses primarily consist of multi-family residential and

professional office. The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district will allow for
commercial uses that are too intense for the area. Keeping the existing R-4 (High
Density Residential) zoning district would facilitate mixed-use development while
allowing City Council oversight in regard to the commercial uses introduced at this
location.
While the downtown core area is in need of additional residential units, a rezoning
to the C-1 (Limited Commercial) district allows for commercial uses that are not
appropriate for an area primarily developed with residential and professional office
uses. In addition, the C-1 zoning district allows for unlimited building height which
is not appropriate when adjacent to low-rise residential and office buildings.

The site receives access from both Maryland Parkway and 11th street. One of
the primary access drives to the proposed parking garage is from 11th Street,
which is only 35 feet wide and serves mostly residential and professional office
uses. Lewis Avenue does not have direct access to the site, but also serves
mostly residential and professional office uses.
order to:

FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by overbuilding the site. Alternative
design with additional parking and/or fewer residential or commercial units would allow
conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships
imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants
hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter
278 for granting of Variances.
order to:


FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]

design in conjunction with a reduction of intensity would allow conformance to Title 19
setback requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.

The proposed 15-story mixed-use building is not compatible with the surrounding
single-story and low-rise development in the area. The proposed development is
inappropriate for an area predominately developed with residential, professional
office, and other low intensity uses. The site is located outside of the Fremont
East and Founders District mixed-use hubs as identified by the Downtown Master
Plan, which indicates that the proposed development too intense for this
transitional part of downtown.
proposed.
The subject site is not physically suitable for the proposed mixed-use
development as evidenced by the need for companion Variances and a number of
landscape waivers. In addition, the intensity and scale of the proposed
development is not consistent with the development patterns in the area, or the
future development patterns envisioned by the Downtown Master Plan.

The site receives access from both Maryland Parkway and 11th street. One of the
primary access drives to the proposed parking garage is from 11th Street, which is
only 35 feet wide and serves mostly residential and professional office uses.
Lewis Avenue does not have direct access to the site, but it is also 35 feet wide
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
and serves mostly residential and professional office uses. There is concern that
queuing may be an issue on a 35-foot street for ingress and egress into a 307
space parking garage; however, a determination cannot be definitively made until
the traffic study has been completed.
The approval of a 15-story mixed-use development at this location is inconsistent

with the vision of the Downtown Master Plan Founders District, which serves as
the comprehensive planning document for this area. The Downtown Master Plan
envisions this area of the Founders District as being a transition between the more
intense Fremont East and Founders District mixed use hubs, and the intensity of
uses allowed by the C-1 (Limited Commercial) district is not appropriate for this
location.
Mixed-Use is a conditional use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.

The applicant cannot meet Conditional Use regulation 4 for this use, which
requires parking structures to be located away from the street frontages and
screened from view of adjacent rights-of-way. The parking garage fronts both
Maryland Parkway and 11th Street, and the provided screening is minimal.

The Lounge use cannot be conducted in a manner that harmonious and

compatible with existing surrounding land uses as distance separation waivers are
being requested to allow the use within 400 feet of two churches and two schools.
proposed.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
The subject site is not physically suitable for the proposed Lounge Use as
evidenced by the requested distance separation waivers from two churches and
two schools.

The proposed Lounge Use is subject to business licensing review and inspection,
thereby protecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
The use does not meet Title 19.12 distance separation requirements as the site is
located within 400 feet of two churches and two schools. The applicant has
requested waivers to allow the Lounge Use approximately 70 feet from the
nearest church, and 80 feet from the nearest school.
FINDINGS (VAC-70268)
We present the following information concerning this request to vacate certain public
street ROW:
A. Does this vacation request result in uniform or non-uniform right-of-way

widths?
A condition of this Petition of Vacation will be to maintain a 20-foot alley width

so that the right-of-way will remain uniform.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Fourteen
B. From a traffic handling viewpoint will this vacation request result in a

reduced traffic handling capability? No, as it will continue to function as a
public alley once the new right-of-way is dedicated.
C. Does it appear that the vacation request involves only excess right-of-
way? No, it is to vacate a portion of an alley to be used in a multi-family
development.
D. Does this vacation request coincide with development plans of the

adjacent parcels? Yes, SDR-70269.
E. Does this vacation request eliminate public street access to any abutting
parcel? No.
F. Does this vacation request result in a conflict with any existing City
requirements? No.
G. Does the Department of Public Works have an objection to this vacation

request? No.

The proposed 15-story building is not compatible with the surrounding single-story
and low-rise development in the area. The proposed development is
Plan, which makes the proposed development too intense for this transitional part
of downtown.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Fifteen
The site is not consistent with City policies and standards as evidenced by the
need for several landscaping waivers. In addition, the site is not consistent with
the vision outlined for the Downtown Master Plan Founders District.

City;
The building and landscape materials proposed are generally appropriate for the
area and for the City.

The proposed 15-story development is inappropriate for an area predominately

developed with low-rise residential, professional office, and other low intensity
uses. The proposed scale of the building is not harmonious or compatible with
development in the area, and is unsightly in appearance when viewed in context
with the adjacent single and two-story buildings.
Site Development is subject to building permit and business licensing review and
inspection, thereby protecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Sixteen

The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0007-53)
from R-1, R-2 and R-3 to R-4 for property generally located between
03/04/53 9th Street and 14th Street extending south from Fremont Street to
Bonneville Avenue. The Planning Commission recommend approval
with exceptions.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-27-00) a 16-foot
portion of Lewis Avenue between Maryland Parkway and 11 th Street.
10/18/00
The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval. The Order
of Vacation was recorded 06/05/01.

A deed was recorded for a change in ownership for APNs 139-34-
09/24/15
712-098, 099, 101 and 120.
A deed was recorded for a change of ownership for ANP 139-34-712-
06/30/15
100.

A building permit (224280) was issued for minor electoral repairs at
11/21/12 317 South 11th Street, Apartment #6. A final inspection was completed
12/06/12
A building permit (287776) was issued for fire repair at 320 South
03/30/15
Maryland Parkway. A final inspection was completed 10/05/15.
A pre-application meeting was held where project subject matter and
application types were discussed. On-site uses were identified and
03/29/17
determinations where made regarding the various zoning and use
04/24/17
permit alternatives. General site design issues were discussed, as
well as deficiencies that would require a Variance application.
The applicant held a voluntary neighborhood meeting at 401 S.
06/05/17
Maryland Parkway. Staff was not in attendance.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Seventeen
Field Check
The subject site is developed with two operating multi-family
05/04/17
residential apartments.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.05

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Multi-family R-4 (High Density
MXU (Mixed-Use)
P-R (Professional
North Office MXU (Mixed-Use)
Office and Parking)
P-R (Professional
South Office MXU (Mixed-Use)
Office and Parking)
C-1 (Limited
East Office, Retail MXU (Mixed-Use) Commercial), R-4 (High
Density Residential)
Multi-family R-4 (High Density
West MXU (Mixed-Use)

Live/Work Overlay District N/A
Trails N/A
N/A
Assessment)
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Eighteen

Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 0 Feet N
Side 10 Feet 5 Feet N
Corner 10 Feet 0 Feet N
Rear 20 Feet 5 Feet N
Max. Lot Coverage 75 %* 73 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A** 160 feet Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure N/A N/A
Roof or Trellis
Not
Mech. Equipment Screened indicated N**
* Lot coverage for mixed-use developments may be increased up to a maximum of seventy-five percent of the net lot
area upon the approval of a Site Development Plan Review application in accordance with LVMC 19.16.100.
** A condition of approval has been added to ensure compliance with Title 19 utility and mechanical screening
requirements.

R-4 (High Density
Limited by height Limited by height
Residential)
C-1 (Limited Commercial) N/A N/A
Pursuant to Title 19.08, Town Center, the following standards apply:

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 7 Trees 0 Trees N
South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 14 Trees 0 Trees N
East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 5 Trees 0 Trees N
West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 8 Trees 0 Trees N
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Nineteen

Ratio Trees
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 34 Trees 0 Trees N
0 Trees 0 Trees N/A
spaces
Min. Zone Width
North 8 Feet 0 Feet N
East 15 Feet 0 Feet N
West 15 Feet 0 Feet N

Governing
Document
Lewis Avenue Minor Street Title 13.12 35 N/A
Master Plan of
Maryland Pkwy Major Collector Streets and 80 Y
Highways Map
Mixed-Use Parking Analysis
Pursuant to Title 19.12 and 19.18, Mixed-use developments may utilize alternative
parking requirements based on a time-based percentage of comparable Title 19.12
parking standards. The time period with the highest total parking requirement for all
associated uses becomes the mixed-use parking standard for the development. The
alternative mixed-use parking requirement for this site is 359 parking spaces.
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Twenty
Overall Parking Requirement

Parking Parking
Regular Handicapped Regular Handicapped
Required
Parking 359 307 N
Regular and
Handicap 254 regular + N
351 8
Spaces 45 compact 8
Required
Percent
14%
Deviation

General Land Mid- Require 7am- Required 6pm- Required
Use Gross Floor Area 7am d 6pm Parking Mid Parking
Classification or Number of Units parking
WEEKDAY
Retail & 28,817 SF @ 1
100
Personal space per 250 0% 0 92 80% 74
%
Services SF GFA*
Residential 73 one-bedroom
units @ 1.25
space per unit
120 two-
100% 335 55% 185 85% 285
bedroom units
@ 1.75 per unit
1 guest space
per every 6 units
Total 335 277 359
FS
70269 [PRJ-69851]
Staff Report Page Twenty-One
WEEKEND
General Land Mid- Require 7am- Required 6pm- Required
Use 7am d 6pm Parking Mid Parking
Classification Parking Ratio parking
Retail & 28,817 SF @ 1
100
Personal space per 250 0% 0 92 60% 56
%
Services SF GFA*
Restaurant
units @ 1.25
space per unit
120 two-
100% 335 65% 218 75% 252
bedroom units
@ 1.75 per unit
1 guest space
per every 6 units
Total 335 310 308
*6,028 square-feet of the gross commercial square footage is allocated towards the Lounge Bar use,
which does not require any additional parking beyond the principal on-site use. As such, the Lounge Bar
square footage was not included when determining the parking calculations.
Waivers
Zero landscape
15-foot landscape buffer area buffer area along
along the east, south and portions of the east, Denial
west property lines south and west
property lines
Zero landscape
Denial
along the north property line portions of north
property line
One 24-inch box perimeter
tree every 20 feet on-center
along the east, south and Zero perimeter trees
west property lines, and one where 34 are Denial
24-inch box perimeter tree required
every 30 feet on-center along
the north property line.
FS
ZON-70263

ZON-70263

ZON-70263
ST
E WA
ST
RT
AV
TH
E
N9
T
HS
HS
EO
0T
ST
1T
GD
N1
E
N1
NA
TH
VE
S6
ST
C-2 FR
T
HS
EM
TH
O
3T
S8
NT
N1
ST
ST
EC
T
TH
HS
AR
SO
S7
NA
4T
VE
N1
EB
RID
GE
Y
RA
W
ST
VE
PK
TH
C-V
S9
ND
T
HS
A
R-5
YL
3T
LE
W
S1
IS
AR
A VE
R-2
SM
T
T
HS
HS
1T
0T
ST
S1
S1
TH
T
SUBJECT
HS
S8
4T
S1
P-O
R-1
ROI EB
ON
PROPERTY
T
N
E 13
HS
EV
S RU
T
P-R I LL
HS
E
5T
AV
E
R-3
S1
6T
LE
EC W
S1
R-4 LA
CH
OL IS
RK L A VE
AV AW
E AY
GA
R-1
R MA
P-R CE Y FA
SA IR
VE P L
C-1
E CHARLESTON BLVD

HILLSIDE PL
CHAPMAN DR
S 15TH ST
THELM A LN
YUCCA AVE
C-D
Zoning FROM R-4 TO C-1

Residential
Compact-Lot P-R - Professional Offices Date: Tuesday, May 09, 2017
and Parking
7AA
A7b7&
A7 7A7<b77 A77
A7
A7 7&A
77
&&b 777&
77 A7 A Ab7
A 7<7 77 b
Ab AA 77<777Ab
b7
b b A7b A7
7 7 7 A
7b
7 7 7 7Ab 7 b
Ab7
7Ab
AA 77<777Ab
A7
7b
7 b
A
Ab7
7<7 AA 77<777Ab

A7 A7
b7
77 A 7b
A A7 7 b
b7

b Ab7
bbA7b AA 7<777Ab
7
A7 A7
7
7&A 7b
7 b
&&b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7&
7
7 A77AA77C 7<7
7<7 A7bbA77A7AA77<7

AA7AA
b7
7
77 7A A7 bbA7AA 7<7
A7 7
7
77 A7AA 7<7
7A7 77 b 7 77
A7 A7 7Ab 7 7Ab
A
7 77
7Ab
77 7 b7 b 7 A77
A bbA7b A7AA7AA 7<7
7
bA7<77bA
7
b 77<

A7Abb7 <7AA7A

7
7
7
7Ab7Ab7&

7 7< 7<
7
7bA 7A
b A77
<7A7Ab 7<7<7
7<7
7
7A7Ab 7< 7<7

A7
A b77A7Ab 7< 7<7
7
A7
b
b7 A7 A7A7Ab 7< 7<7A
77

7 bbA b
bbA7b b77bbA
A A7&
b
b A7 A7A7Ab
bAb7A7Ab A
b7 Abb7A7Ab
bbA A7A7Ab
b
7

bb7AbA7 A A

7 7 A7bAbA
7
A7 7 7 77777A7 77A7777 7777

<<b77<A7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A
A7 A77A7b7 7 7 7 7
A
A Ab
77 A77 7 7 7 7 7 7
b
b
AA77A7 A7 7 A7 7 A
A
A
7 7 7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A
b
7
A77A7 A7 7 A7 7 A
7
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 77777A7 77A7777 7777
7
7
7
7
<<b77<A7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A

A77A7b7 7 7 7 7
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7
7 AA77A7 A7 7 A7 7 A
7 7 7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A
7
7
A77A7 A7 7 A7 7 A
7
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
777A77777bA7<7
7A77bA777A7A7<7
7Ab <7b7<7777AA777AA7<7A7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7A77AbA77AbbAb7
77 7A7 7 b7
b 7 777777777AA
A77A7
7A
b7A
7

bA A7

7 7
<A

A
b
A

bA
bA

bA

bA

AA AA
A
bA
AAA

<7AAb

A A
b<<7A
A

b b

7 A

bb
7Ab bA
7
A7 A A 7
b
A
A7A

A
77 A7 A
AA
A7 A7
<<A
A
AA

7
b
77 7 A

7&A b7
A
AA
A
b A 7
A
&&b bbA A

<
A

b bA
b
A

A
AAA
7
A
A
AA

AAA
AA
7b
7 7
A7
7
77
A
A
<7AAb
A
<A <A

bA
<<A
A
bAA bAA
AA
7

7 7 7 A
A
b
7A
bA77777
b7bA
bA
A

7A

7A7A77 AbA7A7
A
A
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b
ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-70267, VAC-70268 and SDR-70269 - REVISED

7777777b777777777b777777777b7777777

A7b
7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 A
bAA77 AA7A7A7

A77 7A7
AbA7b7 b7Ab7
b7AA74 A47 A77A7
7 7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 A
AA7bA7 A7A77 7A

bAAA7bA7 777AA7 7A
A77 77 7A
A7A7 77 7A
A7AA74 A4 77 A77bbA7 7A
A

AAA77 7A7AAA7 7A

A7bbAA7 A7A7 7A
7 A7AA74 A47 77 7A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7bA74 7bA47 7bA7A7 7A
b7bAA7 A7 7A
7
7
AA7AA
7 7 7 7 7
7
A7Abb7
7
7A77bb7 77
b
7 7
b7
7A
7 7 7
777 777
7=777 77

77

77777777777777
7A7777b7A7777A77b77777b7777
7A7A77 AbA7A
A
A7
7777A7777777777777777777777777777A777777 77
7777777 A77A777777
777777777777777 !77777777777 77 7 AA7777A7A7A77
7777 b777777A777777777777777777777777777777A777777777777777b77A
77!AAA77A7 bAA77bA777
777
7
7 77bAbAA7b
ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-70267, SDR-70269 and VAC-70268


A
A A
A A7A A A7A
b7A7 : AA :
Ab
A b AA b
7
bA bA
b
7
Ab
7
7b

7: 7:
Ab
7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7: 7:

7:7A 7:7A

7:77b A
7:77b7A
7: 7:

7A7AA
7A 7A

7AA 7AA

7

7 7
7A
bA777777

7A

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A bb A A
7 AA A A
, A7 AA A AA7 A , 7A
b , A
bA b b bA
7
Ab
7
7b

7, 7,
Ab

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7, 7,

7,7A 7,7A

7, 7,

7A7AA
7A 7A

7AA 7AA

7
7 7
7A
bA777777

7A

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A
A A A A
A
A * A7 AA7
A *
AA A
b bA b bA
b
7
Ab
7

7* 7*
Ab

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7* 7*

7*7A 7*7A

7*77b7A A
AA

7* 7*

7A7AA
7A 7A

7AA 7AA

7 7
7

7A
bA777777

7A

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A A A A7A
A A
7A + A AA7 A + AA7b
A A
bA b bA
7
Ab
7
7b

7+ 7+
Ab

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

Ab7
77
7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+ 7+

7+7A 7+7A

A 7+77b7A
AA

7+ 7+

7+77b7A
7A7AA
7A 7A

bbA77+77A7A7 A7AA
7AA 7AA

7 7
7

A7A
bA777777
A
A7A

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A
7/7

b7
A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7AA7 7A 7/7
77 Ab b7
7
77 7A A
7bA
A 7
b
7 7
7
7

A A7Abb7

7

7
A77
77
77
7
A777
bb
777 A7

777
A777
A77 A777
A

A7777 777

A77 A777
A

A7777 77b77
b
A777
A

A77
A777
bbA
A77 7 777 7 7 7
A777
7
77

77
77

b 7 7 b
77
bAA bAA
Ab7 Ab7
777 77
A
A
b
b
A7

77
A
77
A A7
777
777

7

7 7
7/
7 bA7777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7
7
7

7
7
7

A
7 bb
7A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

77
777
77

7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7
A777

A7
7
7
A777
7
A7
A777
7
7
A7
A777

7
7
A7
7
7
A777 bb
7
7A
77
7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
A7AA
77
7
7A

Ab
7
7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
A7
777
7 7
7

7A7A
7 bA777777

7A

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7
A7AA 7A
77 Ab
A7A
7
"77777 bA7A
A777 7A
b7

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
bbA
A777
A7
A777
A7
A777
A7
A777
A7
A777
A7
A777
A7
777

7
7
7

7=7A
7 bA777777

77A

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7

A7AA7 7A
77 Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77
7bbA
A777
A7Ab
A7777 A7

A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777
7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A

A7

A777 77 77 77 77

bbA
A777
7bbA7 777
A777 A777
7bbA7

A777 777
777
A
Ab7

7777 A777
7777
7
7777A 7777A 77 7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A 77 A7
77 77 77 77 77 77 777

7 7 7 7 7 7
7

7 7
7

7>
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7AA

77
7A
Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77
7bbA
A777
7 A7

A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777
7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A

A7

A777 77 77 77 77
7bbA7 777
A777 A777
7bbA7

A777 777
777
A
Ab
7777 A777 7777
7
7777A 7777A 77 7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A 77 A7

77 77 77 77 77 77 777
7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7
7

7>
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7AA

77
7A
Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77
7bbA
A777
7 A7

A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777
7777A
A77 7777 7777

A777 77
77 77

7bbA7 777
A777

A777
7bbA 777
A777
777
7
A
Ab
7
7777 7777 7777 A777 7777
77 77 77 7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A
7777A 77 A7
7
77 77 77 77
777 777
7

7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7
7

7>
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7AA

77
7A
Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77
7bbA
A7Ab7 A777
A777
A7

A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777
7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A

A7

A777 77 77 77 77
7bbA7 777
A777

A777
7bbA 777
A777
777
A
Ab
7
7777 7777 7777 A777 7777
77 77 77 7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A 77 A7

77 77 77 77 777
7

7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7
7

7>
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7AA

77
7A
Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77
7bbA
A777
7 A7

A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777
7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A

A7
A777 77 77 77 77

7bbA7 777
A777 A777
7bbA 777
A777
777
7
A
Ab
7
7777 7777 7777 A777 7777
77 77 77 7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A 77 A7
7
77 77 77 77 777
7

7 7 7 7 7

7 7
7

7>
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7AA

77
7A
Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77
7bbA
A7Ab7 A777
A777
A7

A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777
7777A
A77 7777 7777

A777 77
77 77

7bbA7 777

A777

A777
7bbA 777
A777
777
A
Ab
7
7777 7777 7777 A777 7777
77 77 77 7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A 77 A7
77 77 77 77 777
7

7 7 7 7

7 7
7

7>
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7
7
7

7
7
7

A
7 bb
7A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

77
7"77

77

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A7
A777

7
A7
A777
7
A7
7
A777
A7
7
A777

7
A7
7
7
A777 bb
7
7A
77
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7 7 7 7 7
7
A7AA7
777 7A

7
Ab
7

bAb
7

bAb

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
A7
777
7
7
7

7A7A
7 bA777777

7A

7A7A777 AbA7A7
A
A
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

bAb

7
bAb
A7AA 7A
7
777 Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7777 7777 7777 7777
77 77 77 77
7bbA

A777
77 7
A7777 A7777
A7

A777
A7
A777
77 A A7
A7777
7777 7777 777
Ab 7777A
A7777 77 77 77
A7 77
A777
A
A777
A77 A7b
A777

A7777

7bbA
A7777 777

7b7 A777

A777
777
777

A777 7777

7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A 77 A7
77 77 77 77 777
7

7 7 7 7

7
7 7

7?
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A7
A
A
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77

7bbA
A777
A7
A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777

777

7bbA A777
A777
777
777
7777
7777A 7777A 7777A 7777A 777 A7
77 77 77 77 777
7

7 7 7

7 7
7

7-
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77

7bbA7 7bbA
A777
A777
7 A7
A777
A7
A777
A7
A7777
7777 7777 7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777

7
A777
b7
77
777
A777

777
7bbA 777
77
7A
77
A
777
A77b
777
A7
7A 777
A777

777
7

7 7 7 7

7 7
7

7.
7 bA777777
7

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7777 7777 7777 7777

77 77 77 77

7bbA

7bbA7 A777
A777
A7
A777
A7
A777
A7 7777 7777 7777
A7777
77 77 77 7777A
A7 77
A777

777
A777
777
777
7 7 7

7 7
7

77770
7 bA777777

7777

7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
AA7777A7A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A7A7 A7A A7A7 A7A7 b7A
Abb7b Abb7b7 bA7A7 A

A
7A
A
7AA

7A7A AbA
A
7A

7
7777
7
777 AA7777A7A7A77

77
77bAbAA7b

ZON-70263 [PRJ-69581] - REZONING RELATED TO VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-7267, VAC-70268
AND SDR-70269 - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LEWIS AVENUE AND MARYLAND PARKWAY
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017

ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266,

SUP-70267, SDR-70269 and VAC-70268

ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266,

SUP-70267, SDR-70269 and VAC-70268

ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266,

SUP-70267, SDR-70269 and VAC-70268

SUBJECT:
VAR-70264 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70263 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW 307 PARKING SPACES WHERE 364 SPACES ARE
REQUIRED on 1.05 acres at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and Maryland Parkway
(APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED:
C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
VAR-70264

VAR-70264


SUBJECT:
VAR-70265 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70263 AND VAR-70264 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET
AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO-FOOT FRONT AND
CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED, A FIVE-FOOT SIDE
YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A FIVE-FOOT REAR YARD
SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.05 acres at the northwest corner of Lewis
Avenue and Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density
Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851].
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
VAR-70265

VAR-70265


SUBJECT:
SUP-70266 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-70264 AND VAR-
70265 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR
CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT at the northwest corner of Lewis Avenue and Maryland
Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SUP-70266

SUP-70266


SUBJECT:
SUP-70267 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265
AND SUP-70266 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER:
BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
A LOUNGE BAR USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 70-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND AN 80-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A SCHOOL WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at the northwest corner
of Lewis Avenue and Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High
Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map
paper use, backup
SUP-70267

SUP-70267


SUBJECT:
VAC-70268 - VACATION RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266
AND SUP-70267 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER:
BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a
portion of a 20-foot wide public alley west of Maryland Parkway, between Lewis Avenue and
Bridger Avenue, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69851]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
A 7 7 A b A 7
b 7 VAC-70268A 7
77 7 7 7b
77A 7 7b 7b
77 7 7b 77b 7
777774 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 7777777
77777 777
7
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 77A 7 77777 777
777 777
77 7
77 77
7
77 77 A A
A b
A A
A 77
7 77 7b 77 A 7 7 7

A b A 77 7

A 7
b 7 7 4 7 7 7A
7A 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
A 7 7
7
77
7 77
7 7 A 777 7 7b
b 7 7 7 7A 7
7A 77
A 7

7 7
b A 7 7b 7 A
7 7 4 A 7 A
A 7 b
b 77 7
7A 7 A

A b A 7 7b 7b b 7 A
A
A 7
7 7 77 7 A 7
7A A 7
b 7
7A 7 A
A 7 A b 7 b b b 7b 7
7 7 7 7 7 77
A R
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 74 4
777 77
7 7 7 A 7 7
VAC-70268
A 7 777 7 7
77 77777 777 b 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7
777777 7 7
7 7777 A 7 7 7 777
A b 77 7 7 7
7777
A A
7 A 7 7A 7 4A 7
A 7 7 7

7

VAC-70268

VAC-70268

VAC-70268

VAC-70268

VAC-70268

VAC-70268

VAC-70268

VAC-70268

b A 7

7 7 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 A
A 7
77
&A 77
VAC-70268
b 7 A
b A 7

VAC-70268
A 7 7 A
b A 7

VAC-70268

SUBJECT:
SDR-70269 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-70263, VAR-
70264, VAR-70265, SUP-70266, SUP-70267 AND VAC-70268 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC, ET AL - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 15-
STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONTAINING 193 MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 28,817 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH
WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG PORTIONS
OF THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED,
TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE
NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED, AND TO ALLOW ZERO
PERIMETER TREES WHERE 34 ARE REQUIRED on 1.05 acres at the northwest corner of
Lewis Avenue and Maryland Parkway (APN''S 139-34-712-099, 100, 101 and 120), R-4 (High
Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SDR-70269

SDR-70269

SDR 70269
BDR Cascadia, LLC
NWC Lewis Avenue and Maryland Parkway

Proposed mixed-use development with 193 apartments and 28.187 thousand square feet of retail use.
First Current Use

Second Current Use

AM Peak Hour SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DWELL] 1 0.75 1
PM Peak Hour 1.00 1
Total Current Use

First New Use

Second New Use

SHOPPING CENTER/GENERAL RETAIL
AM Peak Hour [1000 SF]
28.187 0.96 27
Total New Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) n/a 2,487

AM Peak Hour APARTMENT [DWELL] 60 n/a 39
PM Peak Hour n/a 224

Net Change
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) n/a 2,271

PM Peak Hour n/a 204

Maryland Parkway
Bridger Avenue

Maryland Parkway 30,540
Bridger Avenue 15,600
This project will add approximately 2,271 trips per day on 11th St., Lewis Ave. Maryland Pkwy. and Bridger Ave. Currently,
Maryland is at about 26 percent of capacity and Bridger is at about 11 percent of capacity. With this project, Maryland is
expected to be at about 34 percent of capacity and Bridger to be at about 16 percent of capacity. Counts are not available
in this area for 11th or Lewis, but they are believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 204 additional cars, or about seven every two
minutes.

SUBJECT:
ZON-70273 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 0.33 acres at the southwest corner of
Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69852]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-70284
and SDR-70285 [PRJ-69852]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-
70284 and SDR-70285 [PRJ-69852]
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-
70284 and SDR-70285 [PRJ-69852]
4. Photo(s) - ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-70284 and SDR-70285
[PRJ-69852]
5. Justification Letter - ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-70284 and
SDR-70285 [PRJ-69852]
6. Clark County School District - School Development Tracking Form - ZON-70273 and SDR-
70285 [PRJ-69852]
ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-70284 and SDR-70285 [PRJ-
69852]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-70273 Staff recommends DENIAL.

VAR-70275 ZON-70273
conditions:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to ZON-70273

VAR-70280
ZON-70273
SUP-70281 VAR-70275
conditions:
VAR-70280
ZON-70273
SUP-70284
SUP-70281
ZON-70273
VAR-70275
SDR-70285 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-70280
conditions: SUP-70281
SUP-70284
FS
69852]
Notification Page One
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 425 - ZON-70273 and VAR-70275

425 - VAR-70280 and SUP-70281
425 - SUP-70284
425 - SDR-70285
PROTESTS 0 - ZON-70273 and VAR-70275

0 - VAR-70280 and SUP-70281
0 - SUP-70284
0 - SDR-70285
APPROVALS 0 - ZON-70273 and VAR-70275

0 - VAR-70280 and SUP-70281
0 - SUP-70284
0 - SDR-70285
FS
69852]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

Permit (SUP-70284) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70285) shall be
Planning

Permit (SUP-70284) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70285) shall be
FS
69852]
Conditions Page Two
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for the Mixed
Use use.

approved.
application.
FS
69852]
Planning

Restaurant with Alcohol use.

70281), and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70285) shall be required, if
approved.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved to allow a 230-foot distance

separation from a church, and a 240-foot distance separation from a school where
400 feet is required.
application.
license.
FS
69852]
Planning

70281), and Special Use Permit (SUP-70284) shall be required, if approved.
3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan date stamped 06/01/17,
landscape plans date stamped 05/04/17, building elevations date stamped
05/01/17, and floor plans date stamped 06/01/17 and 05/01/17, except as
4. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer
area along portions of the east and north property lines where 15 feet is required, a
zero-foot landscape buffer area along portions of south property where eight feet is
required, and to allow zero perimeter trees where 16 are required. Landscaping
shall be installed within the right-of-way as shown on the approved landscape
plans.
7. All utility and mechanical equipment shall be screened per Title 19 standards.
9. No turf shall be permitted in the non-recreational common areas, such as medians

and amenity zones in this development.
FS
69852]
Conditions Page Five
10. All perimeter walls shall meet Title 19 standards.

13. Prospective buyers shall be informed that views may be obscured by future
adjacent development and this information shall be included in project CC & Rs.
Public Works
16. Dedicate a 10-foot radius at the southwest corner of 11th Street and Lewis Avenue
prior to the issuance of any permits as required by the Department of Public
Works.
site. Sidewalk paths along 11th Street and Lewis Avenue must comply with
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines.
18. Construct approximately 400 feet of relief sewer in Lewis Avenue from the alley on
the west edge of this site to the alley between 11th Street and Maryland Parkway
or another route acceptable to the Sanitary Sewer Planning Section of the
Department of Public Works concurrent with onsite development activities.
FS
69852]
Conditions Page Six
20. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the 11th
Street and Lewis Avenue public rights-of-way prior to the issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of
the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured
entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property within the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to
the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (229-4836).
21. One onsite parking spot shall be designated as a pick up and drop off spot for
Transportation Service Providers (TSP).
permits,[or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
FS
69852]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a prosed 15-story mixed-use development consisting of 60 residential

units and 8,014 square feet of commercial space at the southwest corner of Lewis
Avenue and 11th Street.
ISSUES
A Rezoning is requested from R-4 (High Density Residential) to C-1 (Limited

Commercial). Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Variance is requested to allow 76 parking spaces where 146 spaces are required.
Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Variance is requested to allow five-foot front yard, side yard and corner side yard
setbacks where 10 feet is required, and to allow a five-foot rear yard setback where
20 feet is required. Staff recommends denial of the request.
Mixed-Use is a conditional use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The
applicant cannot meet Conditional use regulation 4 for this use, which requires
parking structures to be located away from the street frontages and screened from
view of adjacent rights-of-way. Therefore, a Special Use Permit is required and staff
The Restaurant with Alcohol use is permitted in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district with approval of a Special Use Permit. A Waiver is requested to allow this
use within 400 feet of an existing Church/House of Worship and a School. Staff
does not recommend the waiver request and therefore recommends denial of the
Special Use Permit request.
In conjunction with the Site Development Plan Review, perimeter landscape waivers
are being requested to allow zero feet of buffer area along portions of all property
lines, and to allow zero street/perimeter trees where 16 are required. Staff
ANALYSIS
Rezoning
The subject site is located within the Revitalization Area of the 2020 Master Plan, the
Founders District of the Downtown Master Plan, and the Las Vegas Redevelopment
area. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from R-4 (High Density Residential) to C-1
FS
69852]
(Limited Commercial) in order to accommodate a wider range of permissible uses for

the proposed mixed-use tower.
This request constitutes spot zoning as the immediate vicinity is zoned for residential
uses with no other commercial zoning districts in close proximity. The C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district will permit commercial uses that are not appropriate for an
area that is predominantly developed with low-intensity office and multi-family
residential units. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the vision outlined by the
Downtown Master Plan as this area is intended to be a transitional area between the
Fremont East and Founders District Urban Hubs. The C-1 (Limited Commercial) district
will also allow for certain development standards, such as unlimited building height, that
are too permissive for this location.
The existing R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning district allows for mixed-use
development with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Retaining the existing R-4
(High Density Residential) zoning district is preferable to a rezoning to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) as it allows all uses in a mixed-use development that are allowed by-right
in the P-O (Professional Office), O (Office) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
districts with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Uses not permitted by-right (i.e.
conditional uses and uses requiring a Special Use Permit) would not be allowed as
those commercial uses tend to be more intense and are incompatible in locations that
have similar development patterns as the subject site.
Retaining the existing zoning would give the City Council discretion regarding the
introduction of commercial uses into an area currently developed with residential and
low-intensity office uses. Retaining the R-4 designation would also limit building height
and allow for development standards that are more in character with the surrounding
neighborhood, as well as keeping with the vision of the Downtown Master Plan. While
the existing MXU (Mixed Use) Redevelopment Plan land use designation is consistent
with the requested C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, staff recommends denial of
the request as the uses and development standards associated with the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district are not appropriate for this location.
Site Development Plan Review

The request is for a 15-story mixed-use development consisting of 60 residential units
and 8,014 square feet of commercial space at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue
and 11th Street. The site is currently developed with an operating multi-family
apartment complex.
The site receives access via a drive from 11th street, an 80-foot collector street. While
the right-of-way is 80 feet wide, the actual road width is only 35 feet wide and mostly
serves the surrounding residential and professional office uses. There is concern that
FS
69852]
queuing may be an issue on a 35-foot street for ingress and egress into the parking
garage; however, a determination cannot be definitively made until the traffic study has
been completed.
The subject site does not meet the required setbacks for the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district. A companion Variance has been requested to allow a five-foot front, side
and corner side-yard setbacks where 10 feet is required, and a five-foot rear-yard
setback where 20 feet is required. Staff has recommended denial of the request and a
detailed analysis can be reviewed in the Variance Findings section of this report.
On-site parking is provided within a 76 space parking garage located on levels one
through five of the building. 30 percent of the proposed parking spaces are identified as
compact. Using the mixed-use alternative parking standards identified in Title 19.18,
the combination of proposed uses requires 146 parking spaces. The site is deficient by
70 spaces, which is a 48% percent deviation from the amount required by code. A
companion Variance has been submitted to provide relief from this requirement, and
staff recommends denial of the request. A detailed analysis can be reviewed in the
The floor plans indicate a mix of commercial and residential uses within the 15-story
building. The commercial uses identified on the ground floor include a 3,222 square-
foot art gallery, and a 1,914 square-foot general retail space. The commercial spaces
have direct access to the pedestrian way along the Lewis Avenue street frontage. A
2,354 square-foot Restaurant with Alcohol is proposed on the 15th floor. 26 one-
bedroom and 34 two-bedroom units are located on floors six through fourteen. A pool
deck and resident amenity area is located on the 15th floor. A Special Use permit has
been submitted to allow the Restaurant with Alcohol and staff has recommended denial.
A detailed analysis can be reviewed in the Special Use Permit section of this report.
The landscaping for the site is unique in that the proposed landscaping is primarily
located within the public right-of-way rather than on-site. There is minimal buffering and
zero street trees physically located on the site, and waivers have been requested to
allow zero feet of landscape buffer along portions of the north, south, and east property
lines, and zero perimeter trees where 34 are required. A public alley is located adjacent
to the west property line of the site.
The landscaped amenity areas provided within the public right-of-way are intended to
serve as the sites perimeter landscape buffer. The plan depicts a nine-foot detached
sidewalk and 12-foot landscape area along the east property line, and a nine-foot
detached sidewalk and a 11.6-foot landscape area along the north property line. The
landscaped areas are planted with 24-inch box Chinese Pistache and Heritage Live
Oaks spaced 20 feet on-center. There are several planter areas that are located both
FS
69852]
on private and public property along north and east property lines. These areas vary in
width between eight and 13 feet, and are planted with various five-gallon shrubs. There
is no landscaping being provided along the south property line, or adjacent to the
alleyway.
While amenity zone landscaping is being provided in the right-of-way along the north
and east property lines, the landscape waivers cannot be justified as the depicted
landscape areas are not consistent with the development standards usually associated
with either off-site amenity zones in the nearby Downtown Centennial Plan area, or the
perimeter buffering dictated by Title 19. In addition, no buffering or perimeter trees are
being provided along the south property line, and as such staff recommends denial of
the landscape waiver requests.
The site elevations depict a 15-story mixed-use building. Ground level glazing is utilized
for the commercial storefronts, and the residential floors utilize construction materials
that include metal panels, columns, and railings. The parking garage is located on levels
one through five, and the residential units are located on the upper floors. The building
utilizes architectural features such as canopies, pop-outs and building relief to provide
visual interest for each building face. While the parking garage is partially screened by
metal screens, it is located along the 11th Street and Lewis Avenue street frontages,
which does not meet the Conditional Use Permit requirements for a Mixed Use
development in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Due to non-compliance with
this provision, a companion Special Use Permit has been requested to provide relief
from this requirement. Staff has recommended denial of the request, and the analysis
can be found in the Special Use Permit section of this report.
While mixed-use development is generally encouraged within the downtown core, the
scale of the proposal is inappropriate for an area predominately developed with
residential, professional office, and other low intensity uses. A 15-story building is not
compatible with the surrounding single-story and low-rise development in the area, and
the site is located outside of the Fremont East and Founders District mixed-use hubs as
identified by the Downtown Master Plan. The need for setback variances and
landscape waivers indicate that the site is being overbuilt and not appropriate for this
location. A 15-story tower will be out of scale with the existing development in the area,
and will be too intense for this transitional portion of downtown. The proposed
development would be more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood if the
existing R-4 (High Density Residential Development) development standards were
utilized rather than the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) standards. Staff
recommends denial of the Site Development Plan Review and all associated waivers.
FS
69852]
Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD)

The proposed development will require at least one above-ground backflow prevention
assembly and the current site plan does not provide adequate space onsite for the
water facilities unless in the courtyard area. It should be noted that the existing water
line adjacent to the parcel is a six-inch line which means the development will likely
need to extend additional main to provide domestic and fire flow for the building. Civil
and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and
fire flow availability. Southern Nevada Water Authority Regional Connection Fees will
be assessed on a per unit basis and will be due at the time of building permit sign off.

Mixed-Use is defined as The vertical integration of residential uses and commercial or
civic uses within a single building or a single development, where the uses share
pedestrian access, vehicular access, parking functions, or any combination thereof.
The proposed development meets the definition of Mixed-Use as it will contain both on-
site commercial and residential uses.
The Conditional Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
1. Residential uses permitted as of right in the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts
are permitted as conditional uses within a C-1 or C-2 Zoning.
The subject sites proposed zoning is C-1 and the project is in conformance with
this requirement.
2. Commercial uses or civic uses shall at a minimum be located at the ground

level fronting the primary public rights-of-way and may extend beyond the
ground floor. The principal entryway to access those uses, whether
individually or collectively, shall be directly accessed from and oriented to
the public sidewalk.
The floor plans indicate that the anticipated commercial uses will be located on
the ground floor and will be accessible from the public sidewalk as required.
3. Residential uses shall not be permitted on the ground floor fronting on

primary public rights-of-way, but may be located at or above the second
level of the building. Residential uses may be located on the ground floor
of any building or portion thereof that is located at the interior of the
development site and does not front on an arterial or collector street.
FS
69852]
The floor plans do not indicate any residential uses on the ground level.
4. Surface parking lots shall be located to the side or the rear of the principal
building(s) on the site, and shall be screened from view of the adjacent
rights-of-way by the principal building(s) or a landscape buffer in
conformance with the requirements of LVMC Chapter 19.08. Parking
structures shall not be located along the street frontages of the
development site, but shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-
way by the principal building(s).
There are parking structures located along the street frontages and they are not
screened by the principal building. The Mixed-Use use is typically a conditional
use permit within the C-1 zoning district; however, a Special Use Permit is
required as the proposal does not meet this condition.
The proposed 15-story mixed-use building is not compatible with the surrounding single-
story and low-rise development in the area. The proposed development is inappropriate
for an area predominately developed with low-rise residential, professional office, and
other low intensity uses. A Special Use Permit is being requested because the
development does not meet the Conditional Use Requirement that prohibits the parking
structure from being located along the street frontage, which further exemplifies the
incompatibility of the development at this location. Staff recommends denial of the
request.

The Restaurant with Alcohol use is defined as A restaurant and bar operation with
alcoholic beverage sales in which: 1. The actual seating available at all times within the
dining area will accommodate at least 100 persons. For purposes of this requirement,
the dining area does not include bar stool seating at the bar or lounge seating, but
may include table or booth seating within the bar area and table seating within a patio
area; 2. Alcoholic beverages are served in the restaurant area only in conjunction with
the service of food; 3. Full-course meals are available during all hours the bar area is
open to the public; 4. A cook and food server, other than a bartender, are available at all
times the bar area is open to the public; and 5. The restaurant operation is the principal
portion of the business. The proposed use meets the definition.
1. No restaurant with alcohol use shall be located within 400 feet of any
church/house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more
than 12 children, or City park.
FS
69852]
There is a church and a school within 400 feet of the proposed use. The
applicant has requested a waiver to allow the Restaurant with Alcohol use
approximately 230 feet from an existing church located to the north of the site,
and from a school located approximately 240 feet to the west of the site.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the minimum

distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference
to the shortest distance between two property lines, one being the property
line of the proposed restaurant with alcohol which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property
line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed restaurant with
alcohol. The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to
intervening obstacles. For purposes of measurement, the term property
line refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and does not include
the property line of:
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for
on-site parking and which has been created so as to avoid the
distance limitation described in Requirement 1.
All measurements from the protected uses have been measured in accordance
with this requirement.
3. In the case of a restaurant with alcohol proposed to be located on a parcel

of at least 80 acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in
Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest
portion of the structure in which the restaurant with alcohol will be
located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed restaurant with alcohol which will be
located within a shopping center or other multiple tenant structure,
from the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest
property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the
restaurant with alcohol will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles.
The site is under 80 acres in size, and therefore this requirement does not apply.
FS
69852]
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for a restaurant with

alcohol which also requires a waiver of the distance limitation in
Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shall take into consideration the
distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation to the City
Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support of the decision.
This use permit and associated waiver request will be considered by the
Planning Commission on June 13, 2017.

establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection
with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992, or in
connection with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after
July 1, 1992.
The site does not have a non-restricted gaming license and therefore this
requirement does not apply.
6. The parcel or use is operated or controlled by an agency or subdivision of

local, state or federal government. (C-V only).
The site does is not operated or controlled by an agency or subdivision of local,

state or federal government and therefore this requirement does not apply.
7. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the

Business licensing regulations and inspections will mandate compliance with the
The Restaurant with Alcohol use cannot be conducted in a manner that harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses as distance separation waivers are
being requested to allow the use within 400 feet of a church and a school. The table
below indicates the location and distance from the protected uses:
Protected Use Location Distance from Subject Site

Church 318 S. 11th Street 230 ft.
School 925 E. Clark Ave 240 ft.
Due to the number of protected uses within the 400-foot distance separation radius,
staff recommends denial of the request.
FS
69852]

The proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district is in conformance with the
MXU (Mixed Use) zoning district.
districts.
The surrounding land uses and zoning districts consist of primarily low-rise multi-
family residential and professional office. The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district will allow for commercial uses that are too intense, and allow for permissive
development standards that would allow development that would not be
consistent with the existing development in the area. The existing R-4 (High
Density Residential) zoning district would facilitate mixed use development while
allowing City Council oversight in regard to the commercial uses introduced into
this area.
While the downtown core area is in need of additional residential units, a rezoning
to the C-1 (Limited Commercial) district allows for uses that are not appropriate for
the area. Given the existing zoning surrounding the property, a rezoning to C-1
(Limited Commercial) would also constitute spot zoning at this location.

The primary access drive to the proposed parking garage is from 11th Street,
which is only 35 feet wide and serves mostly residential and professional office
uses. Lewis Avenue does not have direct access to the site, but also serves
mostly residential and professional office uses.
FS
69852]
order to:



design with additional parking and/or fewer residential or commercial units would allow
conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships
imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants
hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter
278 for granting of Variances.
order to:

FS
69852]


design in conjunction with a reduction of intensity would allow conformance to Title 19
setback requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.

While mixed use development is generally encouraged within the downtown core,
the proposed 15-story mixed-use building is not compatible with the surrounding
single-story and low-rise development in the area. The proposed development is
Plan, which indicates that the proposed development too intense for this
transitional part of downtown.
proposed.
FS
69852]
The subject site is not physically suitable for the proposed mixed-use
development as evidenced by the need for companion Variances and a number of
landscape waivers. In addition, the intensity and scale of the proposed
development is not consistent with the development patterns in the area, or the
future development patterns envisioned by the Downtown Master Plan.

The site receives access from 11th street, which is only 35 feet wide and serves
mostly residential and professional office uses. Lewis Avenue does not have
direct access to the site, but it is also 35 feet wide and serves mostly residential
and professional office uses. There is concern that queuing may be an issue on a
35-foot street for ingress and egress into the parking garage; however, a
determination cannot be definitively made until the traffic study has been
completed.
The approval of a 15-story mixed-use development at this location is inconsistent

with the vision of the Downtown Master Plan Founders District, which serves as
the comprehensive planning document for this area. The Downtown Master Plan
envisions this area of the Founders District as being a transition between the more
intense Fremont East and Founders District mixed use hubs, and the intensity of
uses allowed by the C-1 (Limited Commercial) district is not appropriate for this
location.
Mixed-Use is a conditional use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.

The applicant cannot meet Conditional Use regulation 4 for this use, which
requires parking structures to be located away from the street frontages and
screened from view of adjacent rights-of-way. The parking garage fronts both
Lewis Avenue and 11th Street, and the provided screening is minimal.
FS
69852]

The Restaurant with Alcohol use cannot be conducted in a manner that

harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses as distance
separation waivers are being requested to allow the use within 400 feet a church
and a school.
proposed.
The subject site is not physically suitable for the proposed Lounge Use as
evidenced by the requested distance separation waivers from a church and a
school.

completed.
The proposed Restaurant with Alcohol is subject to business licensing review and
The use does not meet Title 19.12 distance separation requirements as the site is
located within 400 feet of a church and a school. The applicant has requested
waivers to allow the Restaurant with Alcohol use approximately 230 feet from the
nearest church, and 240 feet from the nearest school.
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Fourteen

While mixed use development is generally encouraged within the downtown core,
the proposed 15-story building is not compatible with the surrounding single-story
and low-rise development in the area. The proposed development is
Plan, which makes the proposed development too intense for this transitional part
of downtown
The site is not consistent with City policies and standards as evidenced by the
need for several landscaping waivers. In addition, the site is not consistent with
the vision outlined for the Downtown Master Plan Founders District.

completed.
City;
The building and landscape materials proposed are generally appropriate for the
area and for the City.
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Fifteen

The proposed 15-story development is inappropriate for an area predominately

developed with low-rise residential, professional office, and other low intensity
uses. The proposed scale of the building is not harmonious or compatible with
development in the area, and is unsightly in appearance when viewed in context
with the adjacent single and two-story buildings.
Site Development is subject to building permit and business licensing review and

The City Council approved a Petition of Vacation (VAC-0010-93) to
vacate the west ten feet of 11th Street between the south right-of-way
08/12/93
line of Bridger Avenue and the north right-of-way line of Lewis Avenue.
The Vacation was recorded on 09/02/93.

A pre-application meeting was held where project subject matter and
application types were discussed. On-site uses were identified and
03/29/17
determinations where made regarding the various zoning and use
04/24/17
permit alternatives. General site design issues were discussed, as
well as deficiencies that would require a Variance application.
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Sixteen
The applicant held a voluntary neighborhood meeting at 401 S.
06/05/17
Maryland Parkway. Staff was not in attendance.
Field Check
The subject site is developed with two operating multi-family
05/04/17
residential apartments.

Site Area
Gross Acres .33

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Multi-family R-4 (High Density
MXU (Mixed-Use)
North MXU (Mixed-Use)
South MXU (Mixed-Use)
East MXU (Mixed-Use)
West MXU (Mixed-Use)

Live/Work Overlay District N/A
Trails N/A
N/A
Assessment)
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Seventeen

Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 5 Feet N
Side 10 Feet 5 Feet N
Corner 10 Feet 5 Feet N
Rear 20 Feet 5 Feet N
Max. Lot Coverage 75 %* 73 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A** 173 feet Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure N/A N/A
Roof or Trellis
Not
Mech. Equipment Screened indicated N**
* Lot coverage for mixed-use developments may be increased up to a maximum of seventy-five percent of the net lot
area upon the approval of a Site Development Plan Review application in accordance with LVMC 19.16.100.
** A condition of approval has been added to ensure compliance with Title 19 utility and mechanical screening
requirements.

R-4 (High Density
Limited by height Limited by height
Residential)
C-1 (Limited Commercial) N/A N/A

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 7 Trees 0 Trees N
South 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 4 Trees 0 Trees N
East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 5 Trees 0 Trees N
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Eighteen

Ratio Trees
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 16 Trees 0 Trees N
0 0 N/A
spaces
Min. Zone Width
North 15 Feet 0 Feet N
East 15 Feet 0 Feet N
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 5 Feet N

Governing
Document
Lewis Avenue Minor Street Title 13.12 35 N/A
Pursuant to Title 19.12 and 19.18, Mixed-use developments may utilize alternative
parking requirements based on a time-based percentage of comparable Title 19.12
parking standards. The time period with the highest total parking requirement for all
associated uses becomes the mixed-use parking standard for the development. The
alternative mixed-use parking requirement for this site is 146 parking spaces.

Parking Parking
Required
Parking 146 76 N
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Nineteen

Parking Parking
Regular and
Handicap 4 N
139 4 69
Spaces
Required
Percent
48%
Deviation

General Land Mid- Required 7am- Required 6pm- Required
Use Gross Floor Area 7am parking 6pm Parking Mid Parking
Classification or Number of Units
WEEKDAY
Retail & 1,914 SF @ 1
Personal space per 175
Services SF GFA
100
0% 0 22 80% 18
%
3,222 @ 1
Space per 300
GFA
Restaurant 1,820 SF @ 1
space per 50 SF
of seating area
50% 20 70% 28 100% 40
534 SF @ 1
space per 200
SF of remaining
area
units @ 1.25
space per unit
34 two-bedroom
100% 103 55% 57 85% 88
units @ 1.75 per
unit
1 guest space
per every 6 units
Total 123 107 146
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Twenty

WEEKEND
General Land Mid- Required 7am- Required 6pm- Required
Use 7am parking 6pm Parking Mid Parking
Classification Parking Ratio
Retail & 1,914 SF @ 1
Personal space per 175
Services SF GFA
100
0% 0 22 60% 14
%
3,222 @ 1
Space per 300
GFA
Restaurant 1,820 SF @ 1
space per 50 SF
of seating area
45% 18 70% 28 100% 40
534 SF @ 1
space per 200
SF of remaining
area
units @ 1.25
space per unit
34 two- bedroom
100% 103 65% 67 75% 78
units @ 1.75 per
unit
1 guest space
per every 6 units
Total 121 117 132
Waivers
Zero landscape
along the east and north portions of the north Denial
property lines and east property
lines
FS
69852]
Staff Report Page Twenty-One
Waivers
Zero landscape
Denial
along the south property line portions of south
property line.
One 24-inch box perimeter
tree every 20 feet on-center
along the east and north Zero perimeter trees
property lines, and one 24- where 16 are Denial
inch box perimeter tree every required
30 feet on-center along the
south property line.
FS
ZON-70273

ZON-70273

ZON-70273
T
HS
EO
GD
T
0T
E
HS
NA R-5
N1
VE
1T
N1
FR
ST
C-2 EM
TH
O NT
S8
ST
ST
T
TH
HS
EC
S6
AR
3T
SO
N1
NA
VE
ST
TH
S7
EB
RID
Y
GE
ST
W
RA
VE
PK
TH
C-V
S9
ND
T
HS
A
YL
3T
LE
W
S1
AR
IS
A VE R-2
SM
T
T
HS
HS
1T
0T
S1
S1
ST
SUBJECT
TH
S8
T
HS
P-O
PROPERTY
4T
R-1
S1
ROI EB
ON
P-R N EV E 13
I LL S RU
E AV R-3
E
R-4 EC
LA
T
RK
HS
AV
GA E
5T
R CE
S1
SA
VE
C-1
GA
S SA
VE
E CHARLESTON BLVD

CHAPMAN DR
P-R
S 15TH ST
S 10TH ST
R-1 THELM A
YUCCA AVE L N
C-D
Zoning FROM R-4 TO C-1

Residential
Compact-Lot P-R - Professional Offices Date: Monday, May 08, 2017
and Parking

A7 A7 A7
77 77 77
A A A7b
7AA

A7b7&
A
b b
7A7<b77

777&

Ab7
AA 77<777Ab

A7

7b
A7 A7 7 b
77 77 A

b
b 7&
A A A7
A A77AA77B 7<7
b b A7bbA77A7AA77<7
bbA7AA 7<7
7
A7AA 7<
7 7 77
7 7 77
7 A77

A7AA7AA 7<7
7

bA7<77bA
77<
<7AA7A
7Ab7Ab7&
7 7< 7<
7
7bA 7A
<7A7Ab 7< 7<
7A7Ab 7< 7<
b77A7Ab 7< 7<
7 7 7 A7A7Ab 7< 7<
7
A7& 7
7A7 A7A7Ab
b
b bAb7A7Ab A
7 77 Abb7A7Ab
7Ab 7Ab 7A
A7A7Ab
7A 7 7 7 7 7
b
bb7AbA7 A A
A7bAbA

A7 7 7 77777A7 77A7777 7777

<<b77<A7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A
A77A7b7 7 7 7 7
7
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7
AA77Ab7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A
A77A7 7 7 7 7
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
A7 7 7 7 77777A7 77A7777 7777
7Ab
7Ab
77 A
A
<<b77<A7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A
b
b A7 A77A7b7 7 7 7 7
A A77 7 7 7 7 7 7
A
77
b AA77Ab7 7 7 7 7
7
A
7 7 7 7 A7 7 A7 7 A
b A77A7 7 7 7 7
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777A77777bA7<7
7A77bA777A7A7<7
A7 <7b7<7777AA777AA7<7A7
7 7 7A77AbA77AbbAb7
b7 b7
bbA7b 777777777AA
A77A7

A7A
b7A
A7
77
77
A
b7 A7
77
A
7 b7 b7A

7

bA A7

<A
7 7
b
A

7
7
bA
bA

A7

bA

bA

AA AA
A
bA
AAA

<7AAb

A7 A
7Ab
7Ab
b<<7A
A

7<7
b
b b
b
Ab
Ab

b7A 7 A

bb
7Ab7 bA
7
A A 7
7Ab 7Ab7
b
A
A7A

A
7 7 7
A
A7
AA
<<A
A7
A
AA

7
b
77 A

A
77 AA

A7 7
A
A7b <
A

77 bA

A

A
A7b AAA
7
A
A
AA

AAA
AA
7b
77
77
7
A7
7
77
A
A
<7AAb
A
<A7 <A

bA
<<A
A
bAA7 bAA
AA
7 7
A
b
A7 A7 A7
77 77 77 b7bA
A A7b A7b
b
7 7 7
7A
7 bA7777777
7A

7A7A77 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
7A7777A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b
ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-70284 and SDR-70285 - REVISED

7777777b777777777b777777777b7777777
A

A7b
7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 A
77777777777777777777777777 bAA77 AA7A7A7
7 7 77777777777777777777777777 A77 7A7
77777777777777777777777777 AbA7b7 b7Ab7
77777777777777777777777777 b7AA74 A47 A77A7
7 AbA7A7 b7A7 7 A
77777777777777777777777777 AA7bA7 A7A77 7A
77777777777777777777777777 bAAA7bA7 777AA7 7A
77777777777777777777777777 A77 77 7A
77777777777777777777777777 A7A7 77 7A
A
77777777777777777777777777 A7AA74 A4 77 A77bbA7 7A
7A7
77777777777777777777777777 AAA77 7A7AAA7 7A
77777777777777777777777777 A7bbAA7 A7A7 7A
77777777777777777777777777 A7AA74 A47 77 7A
77777777777777777777777777 A7bA74 7bA47 7bA7A7 7A

7
7 7
A7
7

7 7
7
7A77AA7 77

7 7
7

7 7 7
777 777 7777 77

77

77777777777777
7A7777b7A7777A77b77777b7777
7A7A777 AbA7A
A
A7
7777A7777777777777777777777777777A7777777777777777777777
7777777 A77A777777
777777777777777 !77777777777 77 7 7A777A7A77
7777 b777777A777777777777777777777777777777A777777777777777b77A7
77!AAA77A7 bAA77bA777
777
7
77bAbAA7b


A A A A A
A
8 A A A 8 A A
7 AA7 A A AA
bA AA A b bA A AA
b
b b
7
Ab
Ab
7
7
Ab
Ab
7
77b7 77b
778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787 778
7787A7 7787A
7787A7 7787A
7787A7 7787A
7787A7 7787A
7787A7 7787A
7787 778
7 7 7 7

7 7
7A 7A
bA777777 bA777777
777
A

7A7A77 AbA7A7
A
A
7777
7A7777A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b
ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-70284 and SDR-70285

A A A A
A A
0 A7 A A A A 0 A
A AA AA7 A7 A
bA AA A AA A bA A
b b
b b
7
Ab
Ab
7
7
Ab
Ab
7
77b7 77b
7707 770
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707 7707A
7707A7 7707A
7707A7 7707A
7707A7 7707A
7707A7 7707A
7707A7 7707A
07
b7A
A
AA

7707 770
77077b7A
7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7A A7A
7 bA777777 bA777777
77A7
A A

7A7A77 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
7A7777A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A7b
77 A AA
A777 77

A7A7
77
7 7 7 7
A7A
77
A7A
b7A7 77
77bbA
777 77
A7

77
77 A
777
A777
77
A7777
bAbA77bbA7 7777 A
777 A777

b777
A777
7&77b7A
A
7 7 7
7&
bA777777
77A

7A7A77 AbA7A7
A
A
7777
7A7777A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7 7 7 7

A7
A77 b A7b

77
777 A 77 A
A7777 A777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7777
bAb
A7777 7 bAb 7
bAb bAb
7
7
A7AA
A777

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
A7 A7
77 77

A
A A

A77
777
77 A777
7
A A
7 7
7
777 7
77
A7777 A777
77A7Ab7 77A7Ab

7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7<7A 7<7A
7 bA777777 bA777777

777
7A

7A7A77 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
7A7777A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7777A 7777A
A77 b 7777 7777 A77 b 7777 7777
7
7
777 A 77 77 A 77
A7777 77 77 A777 77 77
7
7
A7A A7A
b b
7bbA7 7bbA
A7777 A777
7
7

7A7
A7 A7
77 77
A A
A7777 A777
7
7
7
7
7777 7777 7777 7777

7777A 77 7777A 77 7777A 77 7777A 77
77 77 77 77
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 7 7
7777 77777
7 A7777 7 A777
777 777

777 777

7 7 7 7 7 7
7= 777=
bA777777 bA777777

777777

7A7A77 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
7A7777A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
A

7 A777
7777A 7777A A777
A77 b A7b
7
7
777 A 77 77 777 A
7
b7Ab A777
A777 A7777 A777
7
A777
7
7
7 77A7bbAb
A777 77b
A7A A7A
b b7
7bbA
7
A777
7bbA
A7777 A7b
A777

7
7
7 7

A7 A7
77 77
A A
A7777 A777
7
7 7 7
7
AA
7
7
7777 7777 b7 A7 AA 7b
7
7
A777 A7777 A A777

7777A 77 7777A 777 Ab
77A A7777 A777
77 77 bbAb
77b 77A7bbAb 77A7bbAb
77b 77b
7
7
7
7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 777 7 77
7 A7777 A777
777 7A

777

7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7? 7?
7 bA777777 bA777777

777

7A7A77 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
7A7777A7A77
777
77
77bAbAA7b

7
7 7 7 7 7
A77 b A7b

777 A 77 A
A7777 A777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
A7 A7
77 77

A A
A7777 A777

7
7
A A
7
7
7

bAb
7
7
7
7 7
777
777 7
77
A7777 A777
77A7Ab7 77A7Ab

7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777<7A 7<7A
bA777777 bA777777

777
777
7A

7A7A77 AbA7A
A
A7
7777
7A7777A7A77 A
777
77
77bAbAA7b

A7A7 A7A7 A7A7 b7A
A7A7 Abb7b7 bA7A

A

7AA

7A7A AbA
A
7A

7
7777
7
777 7A7777A7A77
77
7
77bAbAA7b

ZON-70273 [PRJ-69852] - REZONING RELATED TO VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281, SUP-70284 AND SDR-
70285 - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LEWIS AVENUE AND 11TH STREET
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017
05/04/2017

ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281,


ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281,

ZON-70273 and SDR-70285

SUBJECT:
VAR-70275 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70273 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW 77 PARKING SPACES WHERE 153 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on
0.33 acres at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), R-4
(High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-69852]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
VAR-70275

VAR-70275


SUBJECT:
VAR-70280 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70273 AND VAR-70275 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Variance TO ALLOW FIVE-FOOT FRONT, SIDE AND CORNER SIDE YARD
SETBACKS WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A FIVE-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK
WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.33 acres at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and
11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
VAR-70280

VAR-70280


SUBJECT:
SUP-70281 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70273, VAR-70275 AND VAR-
70280 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT at the
southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), R-4 (High Density
Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-69852].
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SUP-70281

SUP-70281


SUBJECT:
SUP-70284 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-70273, VAR-70275, VAR-70280
AND SUP-70281- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL
USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 230-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND A 240-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
SCHOOL WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th
Street (APN 139-34-712-098), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map
paper use, backup
SUP-70284

SUP-70284


SUBJECT:
SDR-70285 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-70273, VAR-
70275, VAR-70280, SUP-70281 AND SUP-70284 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR CASCADIA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 15-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
CONTAINING 60 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 8,014 SQUARE FEET OF
COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF LANDSCAPE
BUFFERING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE EAST AND NORTH PROPERTY LINES
WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW ZERO FEET OF LANDSCAPE BUFFERING
ALONG PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS
REQUIRED, AND TO ALLOW ZERO PERIMETER TREES WHERE 19 ARE REQUIRED on
0.33 acres at the southwest corner of Lewis Avenue and 11th Street (APN 139-34-712-098), R-4
(High Density Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-69852]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
SDR-70285

SDR-70285

SDR 70285
BDR Cascadia, LLC
SWC Lewis Avenue and 11th Street

Proposed mixed-use development with 60 apartments and 8.014 thousand square feet of retail use.
Current Use

PM Peak Hour 0.62 9
First New Use

Second New Use

SHOPPING CENTER/GENERAL RETAIL
AM Peak Hour [1000 SF]
8.014 0.96 8
Total New Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) n/a 741

PM Peak Hour n/a 67
Net Change
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) n/a 641

PM Peak Hour n/a 58

Maryland Parkway
Bridger Avenue

Maryland Parkway 30,540
Bridger Avenue 15,600
This project will add approximately 641 trips per day on 11th St., Lewis Ave. Maryland Pkwy. and Bridger Ave. Currently,
Maryland is at about 26 percent of capacity and Bridger is at about 11 percent of capacity. With this project, Maryland is
expected to be at about 29 percent of capacity and Bridger to be at about 15 percent of capacity. Counts are not available
in this area for 11th or Lewis, but they are believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 58 additional cars, or about one every minute.

SUBJECT:
VAR-70236 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RAINBOW
DREAMS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW 51 PARKING SPACES WHERE 57 PARKING SPACES ARE
REQUIRED on 2.15 acres at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard (APNs 139-21-601-016 and 017;
139-21-612-049, 050 and 080), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-70024]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 7/19/2017

RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
6. Protest Postcard for VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: RAINBOW DREAMS EDUCATIONAL
FOUNDATION, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
conditions:
SDR-70237 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-70236
conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 287
PROTESTS 1
APPROVALS 0
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

Plan Review (SDR-70237) shall be required, if approved.
2. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan Review

(SDR-3132), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-18051), Variance (VAR-18224),
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-25743), Special Use Permit (SUP-59935),
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59936), Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-64456) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65797) shall be required.
3. This is a Temporary Development approval shall be void three years from the date
of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title
19.16.100(K).
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
Conditions Page Two
Planning
1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan Review

(SDR-3132), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-18051), Variance (VAR-18224),
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-25743), Special Use Permit (SUP-59935),
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59936), Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-64456) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65797) shall be required.

70236) shall be required, if approved.
3. This is a Temporary Development approval shall be void three years from the date
of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title
19.16.100(K).
herein.
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]

Public Works
site.
13. All proposed modular trailers with plumbing fixtures shall connect to the City of Las
Vegas public sewer system. Since sewer laterals cannot cross property lines, a
reversionary map may be required.
permits, or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
15. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for Site
Development Plan Review SDR-64456 and all other applicable site-related actions.
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Variance and Major Site Development Plan Review to construct
three additional modular buildings with four classrooms and two restrooms for an
existing Private School, Primary use at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard.
ISSUES
A Variance (VAR-70236) has been requested to allow 51 parking spaces where 57

parking spaces are required.
Per Title 19.16.100F(1)(b) the proposed development meets the criteria for a Major
Site Development Plan, which allows expansions to existing development which are
5,000 square feet or less that complies with all applicable requirements.
This proposed amendment does not include any changes to the existing Private
School, Primary building.
Re-mapping of the site will be required. A condition has been added to coordinate
with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine the most appropriate
mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots.
ANALYSIS
This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review and Variance for a proposed
3,360 square-foot temporary commercial development at 950 West Lake Mead
Boulevard. The subject site design complies with the previously approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-64456) which allowed two modular buildings totaling
3,600 square feet to the subject site. The subject site is currently comprised of the
primary building structure for the school with 2 modular buildings with a total of 15
classrooms. The applicant has requested to construct three additional 12-foot tall
modular buildings totaling 3,360 square feet, which will provide four additional
classrooms and two restrooms for the existing Private School, Primary use on the west
perimeter of the subject site. The applicant has indicated that the structures are
intended to serve as a temporary development on the subject site, with approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-64456) remaining active for the subject site.
Title 19.16.100(K) defines a Temporary Development as a development that is distinct

from the long-term development otherwise approved for the site and is intended as an
interim use of the site for a limited period of time. Approval for a temporary
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
development may be for a period not to exceed three years, except as may be extended
by means of one Extension of Time for a period not to exceed three years. No more
than one temporary development may be approved for a particular site at any one time.
At the conclusion of the time period specified above, including any approved Extension
of Time, the developer must agree to abandon the temporary development in favor of
the initial, unexpired Site Development Plan approval. Otherwise, the original
entitlements are subject to revocation, and the temporary development shall become
the entitled development for the site. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if an
approval for temporary development includes any deviations from standards, including
exceptions, waivers, or variances, the developer will be required to resubmit to the
entitlement process for approval of the temporary development as the long-term
development for the site.
In 2003, a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132) was approved by City Council for
a 12,048 square-foot Private School, Primary building at 950 West Lake Mead
Boulevard. In 2006, a major amendment (SDR-18051) was approved to expand the
building to 16,657 square feet. Finally, in 2008 a second major amendment (SDR-
25743) was approved to redesign the parking lot and add a playground area. At the time
of original approval and subsequent amendments, the Private School, Primary use was
permissible in the R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) zone and no Special Use
Permit was required.
On 08/11/15 the Planning Commission approved Special Use Permit (SUP-59935) and
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59936) for a proposed an expansion to the
subject site to accommodate for an expanded 15,288 square-foot playground area on
APNs 139-21-612-049 and -050 and expansion and reconfiguration of the parking lot
onto APN 139-21-612-080. The three existing single-family residences would be
demolished to accommodate the expanded parking lot and playground. In addition,
Waivers of the minimum landscape buffer requirements required were also approved as
part of that request.
On 06/06/16 the Planning Department administratively approved a request for a Site

Development Plan Review (SDR-64456) for a Minor Amendment to a previously
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132) to add a 3,600 square-foot
modular building with four classrooms to an existing Private School, Primary use at 950
West Lake Mead Boulevard.
Most recently on 11/16/16 the City Council approved General Plan Amendment (GPA-
66241), Rezoning (ZON-66245) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65797) to
add a 36,874 square-foot building with nine classrooms to an existing Private School,
Primary use with waivers of required landscaping. The General Plan Amendment (GPA-
66241) changed the general plan designation of the site from MLA (Medium Low
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
Attached Density Residential) and MXU (Mixed Use) to PF (Public Facilities). The
associated Rezoning (ZON-66241) amended the zoning of the site from R-2 (Medium-
Low Density Residential) to C-V (Civic). The applicant intends on keeping this
entitlement active, while the three proposed modular buildings associated with this
request are added on a temporary basis. Currently, this is the only proposal for a
temporary development on this site.
The requested Variance is to allow 51 parking spaces where 57 parking spaces are
required, which will allow the existing parking lot to remain in its current configuration.
With the additional four classrooms added to the site, additional parking is required.
Although the project on the site is unique, the lot itself is not; therefore, this is
considered a self-created hardship that NSR 278 does not permit. As the applicant has
provided no compelling evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance related to
the site itself, staff recommends denial of the proposed Variance and Site Development
Plan Review with conditions. FOR TWO PROPOSED ILLUMINATED WALL SIGNS on
0.24 acres at 616 East Carson Avenue, Suite #110
order to:



applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by over developing the site that does not
meet the Title 19.12 parking requirements. Alternative design and a reduction in the
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
amount of classrooms onsite would allow conformance to Title 19.12 requirements. In view
of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is
concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside
the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

Staff finds that this proposal is in context with the previous approvals and
complements the neighboring West Las Vegas Public Library, the Doolittle
Community Center, and nearby educational facilities within the immediate vicinity.
This project has been deemed consistent with the General Plan land use
designations for the C-V (Civic) zoning district per the previous Site Development
Plan Reviews SDR-3132, SDR-18051, SDR-59936, SDR-64456 and SDR-65797.
The additional modular building and parking lot adequately addresses the
standards of Title 19.08. However, the applicant has requested a Variance to
address insufficient parking on the subject site; staff recommends denial of this
request.

Access to the project site will continue to be made via West Lake Mead Boulevard
as originally approved under Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132).
City;
Staff finds the proposed modular buildings to be harmonious with the existing
development occurring in the immediate area. The use will be subject to
periodic inspections, thereby protecting the publics health, safety and general
welfare.
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]

The proposed three modular buildings are 12 feet tall with a light grey and dark
grey panel facade and is not unsightly or obnoxious in appearance.
The proposed modular buildings will be subject to Building Permitting and

Business Licensing requirements of the city of Las Vegas and will not adversely
impact the public health, safety or welfare.

Review (SDR-3132) for a Private School, Primary located adjacent to
12/03/03
the northwest corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and LaSalle Street. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
10073) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132)
12/21/05 that allowed a Private School, Primary on 1.36 acres at the northwest
corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and La Salle Street. Staff
The Planning and Development Department approved a request for a
Parcel Map (PMP-9480) for a 1-lot parcel map on 1.36 acres adjacent
01/05/06
to the west side of La Salle Street, between Lake Mead Boulevard and
Hart Avenue.
Plan Review (SDR-18051) for a Major Amendment to an approved
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132) for a proposed 16,657
square-foot Private School at 917 & 965 Hart Avenue and 916 West
Lake Mead Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request.
12/21/06
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Variance (VAR-
18224) to allow a 13-foot rear yard setback where 20 feet is the
minimum rear yard setback required at 917 & 965 Hart Avenue and
916 West Lake Mead Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the
request.
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]

Plan Review (SDR-25743) to add a playground to an approved Public
01/10/08
or Private School, Primary at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. Staff
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use
Permit (SUP-59935) for a Private School, Primary use at 950 West
Lake Mead Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request.
Plan Review (SDR-59936) for a Major Amendment to a previously
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132) to redesign the
08/11/15 parking lot and add a playground to an existing Private School,
Primary with Waivers to allow an eight-foot wide landscape buffer
along the south property line where 15 feet is required, a ten-foot wide
landscape buffer along the north property line where 15 feet is
required and a five-foot wide landscape buffer along the west property
line where eight feet is required at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard.
Staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Department administratively approved a request for a
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64456) for a Minor Amendment
to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3132)
06/06/16
to add a 3,600 square-foot modular building with four classrooms to an
existing Private School, Primary use at 950 West Lake Mead
Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-66241) from MLA (Medium Low Attached Density Residential)
and MXU (Mixed Use) to PF (Public Facilities) at 950 West Lake Mead
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended
approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-66245)
from R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) to C-V (Civic) on 3.50
acres at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The Planning Commission
and Staff recommended approval of the request.
11/16/16 The City Council approved a request for a Major Amendment (SDR-
65797) to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
3132) to redesign the parking lot and to add a 36,874 square-foot
building with nine classrooms to an existing Private School, Primary
use with Waivers to allow a three-foot wide landscape buffer along the
south property line, a five-foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property line and a five-foot wide landscape buffer along the west
property line where 15 feet is required on 3.50 acres at 950 West Lake
Mead Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended
approval of the request.
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]

A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APN 139-21-612-
02/18/10
050)
12/27/11
080)
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APNs 139-21-601-
12/14/12
016 & -017)
03/04/14
049)

A building permit (#45632) was issued for demolition of a single family
6/24/05 residence at 916 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The permit received a
final inspection 8/20/05.
A building permit (#45631) was issued for demolition of a single family
6/24/05 residence at 952 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The permit received a
final inspection 8/20/05.
A building permit (#730531) was issued for a school at 950 West Lake
Mead Boulevard. The permit received a final inspection on 04/07/08.
09/15/06
A building permit (#730531) was issued for on-site hardscapes at 950
West Lake Mead Boulevard. The permit expired on 02/23/08.
A building permit (#7002544) was issued for an addition to a school at
8/20/07 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The permit received a final inspection
on 04/03/08.
A building permit (#106398) was issued for a six-foot tall block wall at
01/24/08 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The permit has not received a final
inspection.
A building permit (#107616) was issued for an accessory shade
07/15/08 structure at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The permit received a
final inspection on 03/03/09.
A building permit (#115869) was issued for a tenant
01/13/09 improvement/certificate of occupancy for an office at 950 West Lake
Mead Boulevard. The permit received a final inspection on 06/11/09.
A code enforcement citation (#139264) was issued for trash and debris
03/26/14 at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The citation was resolved on
03/27/14.
A building permit (#286308) was issued for onsites and hardscapes
(Rainbow Dreams Academy) at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The
permit has not been finalized.
02/09/16
A building permit (#286309) was issued for a wall/fence (Rainbow
Dreams Academy) at 950 West Lake Mead Boulevard. The permit has
not been finalized.
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative
regarding a Major Site Development Plan Review and Variance for the
04/18/17
construction of three modular buildings totaling 3,360 square feet for
the existing Private School, Primary use located on the subject site.
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and noted a well maintained
private school primary use with all perimeter landscaping installed
05/04/17
except for the western perimeter of the site, which is currently graded
for development and free from trash and debris.

Site Area
Net Acres 2.15

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Private School,
PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Property Primary
MLA (Medium Low
Single Family, R-2 (Medium-Low
North Attached Density
Detached Density Residential)
Residential)
Library
Community
South PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Recreational
Facility (Public)
MLA (Medium Low
Single Family, R-2 (Medium-Low
Attached Density
East Detached Density Residential)
Residential)
Undeveloped MXU (Mixed Use)
Single Family,
West PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Detached
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]

West Las Vegas Plan Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
Pursuant to 19.10.020, the following standards apply:

Standard Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 91,476 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
Front 333 Feet Y
Corner Side (north) 13 Feet Y
Corner Side (south) 49 Feet Y
Rear 5 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 10 Feet Y
Max. Building Height 12 Feet Y
Screened, Gated,
Trash Enclosure Y
w/ a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Y
Pursuant to Title 19.10.020, the following standards apply:

Standards Provided Compliance
Buffer Trees:
North (existing) 7 Trees Y
South (existing) 2 Trees Y
West 12 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 21 Trees Y
JB
VAR-70236 and SDR-70237 [PRJ-70024]

Standards Provided Compliance
Min. Zone Width

North (existing) 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
South (existing) 8 Feet 8 Feet Y
Not Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Indicated

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Lake Mead
Primary Arterial Streets and 100 Feet Y
Boulevard
Highways
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Regula Handi- Handi-
Regular
Units r capped capped
19
classrooms
Private [15
3 per
School, classrooms 57
classroom
Primary (existing) + 4
classrooms
(proposed)]
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 57 51 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 54 3 49 N* 2
Percent Deviation 14% N*
* The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-70236) to allow 51 parking spaces
where 57 parking spaces are required.
JB
VAR-70236

VAR-70236

VAR-70236

VAR-70236

7 7 7 7 7
A7A
AAb7A7777 A7AA
b777
b77A7b7A
777
77Ab77bA
77"7A7
7 7
7bA
7bA777777Ab 777
A 7bA
7bA77777Ab 7
"7
77 7 J
A7Ab7 77
7777 7777 7 A7 7777 7 b77A77b7
A AbA7 777777 777

A7 77 7777777777777777

7
A

b b

A
A

"
A7

A777
7777

7
777
777
777
A7777
777
77777
A77A7
A7
7777
A7

A

777

A
7
b
A7 77A7A "

AA
b
A

A
7

777
7

b

7bAA
"7AAb
bA

A77
Ab77

777
7
A

7777

7
7

A

AA
AA7" 7

"

A
7A7

7A
777777
bA
A
A
bA
bA7A7

bA
A
bA
A
AA

""A
7b
AA

A
bb

A 7

A7
b

b
b

77
7"

bA
A7
b7 b

b

7
77b7777
A
A 7A7 bA

A7 A
A

7b7 7 A
7

b7b
"Ab
bA
A7A

bA7 bA
7Ab
7
AA

A7 7

A7A

bA7
bb
7b

bA
A77
7
b77A

bAb7A7A bA
A7
7
7 A
bA7A
A7
AA

b""
A b

A
b A

A
A

A
AA7

A

Ab

bA

A
A
A
bA
7
A7

7A7 AAA
A
bA

AAA7

7bA

b A
A77

A

b
b
b
A A 7A
AA

b 7b
77
A77
"

77 7

bA
A

"
"7 "A A
AA
7A 7A A

A7
bAAA
A A
A7A
7 A
AA
AA
A
""A
"A7 "A
"7

777 7
A bA7 A
"7AAb
A
A
Ab

A
AA
7

AAb
bAA7 bAA

AbA
AbA
AA
AbA
b
7
AbA
AA
A
7b
b

AA
7
7
777 777
A

7
bAA77A
7
Ab
A

bA
bA
AA

06.13.17 Final PC Packet

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

06.13.17 Final PC Packet

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011

LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL COMMISSIONERS

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large) Trinity Haven Schlottman, Chair

June 13, 2017

City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor

2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 2

8. TMP-70239 - TENTATIVE MAP - SKYE KNOLL - APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES -

9. TMP-70262 - TENTATIVE MAP - SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 24 PARCEL C - APPLICANT: GREYSTONE

10. TMP-70334 - TENTATIVE MAP - SHADOW POINT AT SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 24 PARCEL B -

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

20. SDR-70254 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 4

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

25. ABEYANCE - ZON-69224 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-69220 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

27. ABEYANCE - ZON-68782 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-68781 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

29. ABEYANCE - VAR-67949 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAMARITAN HOUSE,

30. ABEYANCE - VAR-69804 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-67949 - PUBLIC HEARING -

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 5

35. ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SDR-68686 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 6

46. VAR-70275 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70273 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BDR

47. VAR-70280 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-70273 AND VAR-70275 - PUBLIC HEARING -

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 7

51. VAR-70236 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RAINBOW DREAMS

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 8

59. VAR-70277 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-70276 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 9

65. VAR-69628 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JEFFREY M. AND MICHELLE D.

68. VAR-70118 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MICHAEL AND MARSHA

71. VAR-70196 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RONALD YOSHIMITSU HIRAHARA

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 10

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 11

Planning Commission June 13, 2017 - Page 12

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 7/19/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

CASE REQUIRED FOR

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 23

NOTICES MAILED N/A

4. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-

5. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State

8. If not already constructed or guaranteed by the master developer, construct half

This is a 96-lot residential development to be built to Kyle R-CL Single Family

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map

Most Recent Change of Ownership

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses