Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
There are countless rude comments on the Internet. While posting these may seem
inconsequential in the moment, according to Graces Law, a person who commits cyberbullying
in the state of Maryland is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be fined for up to five hundred
dollars or jailed for up to a year (A Brief Review 9). Even more serious than the legal
implications of cyberbullying are the harmful effects on the well-beings of victims of online
harassment. Despite the severity and harsh implications of cyberbullying, students are overall
unaware of effects on victims, sources for help, or legislation. Misunderstanding simply causes
the issue to affect more youth. Since schools are often held accountable for resolving
cyberbullying, the issue should be logically addressed in such facilities. Due to the widespread
Due to the global prevalence of the Internet, cyberbullying is not limited to particular
cultures but rather can be found throughout the world (Kowalski et al. 36). The majority of
youth have Internet or cellphone access, putting them at risk for encountering online harassment
(Coburn et al. 2). Various studies performed in numerous different countries reveal that about
5.6-28% of youth in each country have been cyberbullied (Li 4; evkov et al. 2; Bryce and
Fraser 2). Though the majority of youth have not personally been cyberbullied, 90% of
adolescents have either witnessed or engaged in online harassment (Notar et al. 1). Even if only
as a bystander, most students have in some form encountered the cyberbullying. Given the large
number of students affected by cyberbullying, most appear to be aware of its existence and many
have personal experience with the problem. Online harassment is also overwhelmingly seen by
students as a serious problem. 90% of university respondents believe that cyberbullying is simply
Merchant 2
wrong (Lawler and Molluzzo 3). Students agree that cyberbullying is serious and potentially
dangerous given the harmful effects it can have (Bryce and Fraser 3). Youth are generally
mindful of online harassment and its severe consequences, yet the problem continues. Students
need further education on recognizing and resolving cyberbullying to make progress in reducing
The issue of online harassment is most commonly looked at in K-12 schools, but the
problem does not simply disappear when students reach university age (Washington 22). Around
half of university students have personal experience with cyberbullying, whether they or a person
they know have encountered it (Lawler and Molluzzo 3; Washington 23). Since the problem
persists among older people and later school level, online harassment cannot merely be attributed
to the behavior of adolescents, since the problem persists among older people and later school
levels. Educating youth is necessary to establish lasting knowledge about the issue of online
The prevalence of cyberbullying is serious because the problem is harmful for all
(Lewinsky). One of five victims felt afraid after they were harassed (Herrera et al. 5). This fear
may be caused by the harassment involving threats or the ubiquitous nature of the Internet
preventing escape from the bullying. Targets of cyberbullying suffer from anxiety, insecurity,
depression, low self-esteem and self blame (Lawrence and Adams 4; Carrera et al. 5). Some
victims also engage in destructive or violent behaviors, including possibly bringing a weapon to
school (Carrera et al. 5; Parris et al. 2). The negative impacts reveal the importance of finding a
Internal issues of students involved in bullying affect his or her connection to school.
Bullies and students unaffiliated with cyberbullying see their peers in a more positive light than
victims (Bayer and Uanok 4). Youth at all involved with bullying feel less safe or less connected
with their school than their unaffiliated peers (Bradshaw et al. 6). Feelings of disconnect is
harmful for school performance, since students learn best in an engaging environment
(Bhukhanwala 3). Consequently, it is not surprising that 35% of victims suffer from falling
grades (Herrera et al. 6). Additionally, bullying victims are more likely to drop out of school
(Lawrence and Adams 4). The link between cyberbullying and its negative impact on school
view and performance reveal why the two are connected. Addressing resolutions for online
harassment in school could make a more positive association between the two and help reconnect
disillusioned students.
There is a wide range of youth reactions to online harassment. Student responses may be
grouped into two categories: avoidance or approach (Parris et al. 2). Avoidance includes finding
distance from the harassment or not reacting to it. Two out of five victims simply attempt to
ignore the bully (Li 9). Approach involves attempting to interact with the harasser in some way.
Some students believe that working out problems in person to better understand tone and feelings
of others is an effective response (Parris et al. 12). Subdued victims cry and withdraw themselves
when bullied, while more aggressive ones may try to fight back (Lawrence and Adams 4). Due to
the diversity of student responses, education in effective reactions could help students better
Brief Review 9). In some cases, this provides dangerously expanded school authority. Some
Merchant 4
laws impose punishments too severe on the bully or even the victim (Coburn et al. 7). The laws
are frightening to younger children who fear that their Internet privileges will be revoked if they
report experiencing cyberbullied, as is true in some locations (Washington 24; Coburn et al. 6).
Laws are also sometimes unjustly applied, as was seen in one case in which black students were
found to have been disproportionately punished more (Coburn et al. 6). Schools are also
laws restricting youths right of free speech (Cyberbullying: A Review 6). In some areas,
schools have the authority to invade adolescents privacy by monitoring their Internet history
inside or outside of school (Suski 45). Academic facilities are enabled in some cases to violate
student rights to reduce cyberbullying. Laws need to be more specific in how cyberbullying
should be resolved to prevent schools from having too much authority and protect students.
Though legislation is sometimes too harsh, it is sometimes too weak. Cyberbullying laws
often fail to protect some victims of the problem. A few American laws address online
harassment, but only permit intervention in cases of real threats facing the victim (Washington
5). There is no federal online harassment cyberbullying in the United States (A Brief Overview
1). Each state has its own unique cyberbullying laws, so the punishments are inconsistent across
the country. The laws also constantly change, so school officials are often afraid to take action
for fear of violating new rules (Cyberbullying: A Review 6). In other cases, teachers do not
intervene because they simply do not know why or how the issue should be addressed
(Bhukhanwala 4). Developing a way of handling cyberbullying that all students can benefit from
Regardless of how effective the legislation is, youth are typically unaware of the laws.
Students often misunderstand the law or how it would apply to them (Coburn et al. 6).
Merchant 5
Additionally, with regards to ever-changing laws, many youth may not even be aware of the
new law and therefore may not know that their behaviour is illegal (Coburn et al. 6). Only 40%
of university respondents said that they were knowledgeable of cyberbullying legislation (Lawler
and Molluzzo 4). Education in cyberbullying laws would reduce confusion and ensure that
Students are unsure of whether school staff can properly assist in cases of online
harassment. Only about 2.1% of respondents said that a school official assisted them in their
problem (Li 9). Few students trusted school officials to properly understand or help with their
problem (Li 13). College students neither agreed nor disagreed on whether university
cyberbullying (Lawler and Molluzzo 6). However, in some countries, such as Turkey in which
there is a more traditional culture and higher respect for discipline, students see teachers and
interventions by authority figures more positively (Bayer and Uanok 4). Cyberbullying
education through schools would better instill trust in students for school officials ability to help.
It is essential that students report cyberbullying and receive proper assistance when
seeking help. Half of adolescents stated that no one helped them with their online harassment
problem (Li 9). Once a student does not receive proper help after reporting cyberbullying the
first time, he or she will be discouraged from reporting a future problem (Holfeld and Grabe 5).
Students must be informed on how to seek aid for resolving cases of cyberbullying.
On a larger scale, society as a whole must be more informed on online harassment. Some
students disregard online harassment targeted towards them, seeing it as a weak way of
addressing someone rather than stating rude thoughts in person (Parris et al. 11). Though these
youth are fortunately unaffected, this mentality is dangerous as it pushes the idea that victims
Merchant 6
who do feel devastating effects are weak. The media also promote harmful emotional attitudes
towards cyberbullying. Tragic stories of cyberbullying are so common that people without a
strong personal stake in the issue have dulled emotions and do not fully grasp the gravity of the
conditions (Lewinsky). The media publish stories frequently because people view them but are
not emotionally affected (Lewinsky). Overexposure to tragic cases is causing true understanding
and feelings of the situation to diminish. Cyberbullying is portrayed as so intense that adults and
students often feel hopeless in the face of it (Olweus 2). There is a belief due to the coverage that
there is no way to stop cyberbullying. Victims tragic stories simply add to the hopeless feeling to
create a mentality that it is impossible to tackle online harassment. Educating students is a step
With the vast use of technology today, the issue is inescapable for countless youth who suffer
from the issue. Misunderstanding of online harassment contributes to flawed legislation, weak
support for victims, and the further spreading of the problem. Government funding should be
allocated to inform youth on cyberbullying and how to address it to reduce the issues damage
and keep students safe. If todays students are better prepared to handle cyberbullying, in the
future, they will become teachers, lawmakers, or even just Internet-users who are better able to
Works Cited
Bayer, Yusuf, and Zehra Uanok. "School Social Climate and Generalized Peer
Retaliation and Perceptions of Safety." Professional School Counseling, vol. 12, no. 1,
Bryce, Jo, and James Fraser. "'It's Common Sense That It's Wrong': Young People's
Networking, vol. 16, no. 11, Nov. 2013, pp. 783-87. EBSCOhost,
Bullying in School Settings." Educational Psychology Review, vol. 23, no. 4, Dec. 2011,
Coburn, Patricia I., et al. "Cyberbullying: Is Federal Criminal Legislation the Solution?"
Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, vol. 57, no. 4, Oct. 2015, pp. 566-
Herrera, Jennifer, et al. "The Impact of Training on Faculty and Student Perceptions of
Dec. 2016.
Merchant 8
Hinduja, Sameer, and Justin W. Patchin. "A Brief Review of State Cyberbullying Laws
Hinduja, Sameer, and Justin W. Patchin. "Cyberbullying: A Review of the Legal Issues
Facing Educators." Preventing School Failure, vol. 55, no. 2, 2011, pp. 71-78.
Holfeld, Brett, and Mark Grabe. "Middle School Students' Perceptions of and Responses
to Cyber Bullying." Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 46, no. 4, 2012, pp.
Kowalski, Robin M., et al. "Bullying in the Digital Age: A Critical Review and Meta-
Lawler, James P., and John C. Molluzzo. "A Comprehensive Survey on Student
Lawrence, Gloria, and Frank D. Adams. "For Every Bully There Is a Victim." American
Secondary Education, vol. 35, no. 1, Fall 2006, pp. 66-71. JSTOR,
Lewinsky, Monica. "The Price of Shame." TED Talks, TED Conferences, Mar. 2015,
2016.
Merchant 9
Li, Qing. "Cyberbullying in High Schools: A Study of Students' Behaviors and Beliefs
about This New Phenomenon." Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, vol. 19,
Notar, Charles E., et al. "Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature." Universal Journal
Developmental Psychology, vol. 9, no. 5, 2012, pp. 520-38. Taylor & Francis,
Cyberbullying." Youth & Society, vol. 44, no. 2, 2012, pp. 284-303. SAGE Journals
2017.
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, vol. 17, 2012, pp. 319-28. Taylor & Francis
2017.
School Authority under Cyberbullying Laws." Case Western Reserve Law Review, vol.
65, no. 1, Fall 2014, pp. 63-119. EBSCOhost, web.a.ebscohost.com. Accessed 21 Sept.
2016.
Merchant 10
Varjas, Kris, et al. "High School Students Perceptions of Motivations for Cyberbullying:
Adult Learning, vol. 26, no. 1, Feb. 2015, pp. 21-27. EBSCOhost,