Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Teacher Assessment in Primary Science (TAPS) project is a 3 year project based at Bath Spa University and funded by
the Primary Science Teaching Trust (PSTT), which aims to develop support for a valid, reliable and manageable system of
science assessment which will have a positive impact on childrens learning.
Where did this start? Where did this come from? Where do we start? What can we do with this?
The Nuffield Foundation (2012) The TAPS project team have worked with The Pupil layer and the Teacher layer This pdf can be used as a supportive
recommended that the rich formative local project schools, the Primary Science at the base of the pyramid encapsulate source of examples and/or as a structure
assessment data collected by teachers Quality Mark and the PSTT College to the principles of Assessment for Learning; to support school self evaluation. The
in the course of ongoing classroom create this model of teacher assessment schools should begin by focusing on interactive functions allow you to traffic
work in science should also be made to and populate it with examples . It can be these layers since this is not only the light your assessment systems (on your
serve summative reporting purposes. used as a whole-school self-evaluation foundation of the whole system, it is also own saved copy) and make notes on the
They developed a pyramid model where tool to support schools in identifying where changes will have the most impact approaches in your school.
assessment information flowed from strengths and areas for development in on pupil progress in Primary Science.
classroom practice to whole school school assessment systems . On the pyramid page, each box will take
reporting this is represented by the you to examples if you click on it. The
orange arrow. Science assessment: school self-evaluation tool
back to the top button (bottom right)
will take you back to the pyramid. Each
= NO EVIDENCE
= SOME EVIDENCE
box on the pyramid has buttons for red,
DIRECTION OF
= STRONG EVIDENCE INFORMATION FLOW
THROUGH SCHOOL SCHOOL: DATE:
amber, green and reset (if they are black
Whole school in Adobe try clicking Highlight existing
reporting - How do
4.
WHOLE-
SCHOOL
we support validity and
reliability of teacher
fields on the toolbar). There is a page for
REPORTING
W1
assessment?
FEEDBACK FROM DIALOGUE WITH SCHOOL
making notes about your own school at
the end of the document and a link for
LEADERSHIP, GOVERNORS AND PARENTS INFORMS
CHANGES TO SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
3. Teachers summarise
SUMMATIVE Parents/carers receive oral Summaries of pupil
REPORTING
achievements in terms
of what pupils can do,
and written reports that
identify the next steps for
progress across the
cohort draw on a range
this on each page. If you prefer to do this
not only in terms of levels,
S1
grades or %
S2
their children
S3
of information
TEACHER-
PUPIL/PARENT
on paper then a black and white pyramid
2.
Teachers base their Teachers take part in Pupils are aware of the A manageable system
CONFERENCES
INCLUDE DIALOGUE
ON ATTAINMENT
for printing is also available on the PSTT
MONITORING
website.
There is a shared
OF PUPIL summative judgements of moderation/discussion criteria by which their work for record-keeping is in IN SCIENCE
PROGRESS understanding of
pupils learning on a range with each other of pupils work over a period of time operation to track and report
progression in science
of types of activity in order to align judgements is judged on pupils learning in science
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
1.
Teachers gather evidence Teachers gather Teachers use Teachers use assessment Teachers use assessment
ONGOING
FORMATIVE
Teachers plan Teachers involve pupils assessment to advance to advance pupils
of their pupils learning evidence of their to advance pupils
ASSESSMENT opportunities to in discussing learning pupils learning by learning by providing
through questioning/ pupils learning through learning by giving
elicit pupils science objectives and adapting the pace, time for students to
discussion and study of the products of feedback to students
knowledge and skills criteria for success challenge and reflect on and assess
observation activities and tasks about how to improve
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
content of activities
T6 T7
their own work
If you would like to offer further examples
Pupils focus on science or provide the TAPS team with feedback,
START
Pupils identify their
knowledge, understanding, Pupils assess their own Pupils assess peers ideas Pupils use assessment to Pupils collaboratively (with
existing ideas, learning
needs and interests, and
skills and attitudes in
learning objectives and
ideas and work against
known criteria
and work against known
criteria
advance their learning by
acting on feedback
peers/teachers) identify
next steps in learning
please email
primary.science@bathspa.ac.uk
consider those of peers.
success criteria
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6
Produced by the Teacher Assessment in Primary Science Project, Bath Spa University, developed from the Nuffield Foundation (2012) and Harlen (2013)
SAVE MY PROGRESS Next page
Next page
TAPS pyramid model: science assessment school self-evaluation tool
= NO EVIDENCE
= SOME EVIDENCE
DIRECTION OF
= STRONG EVIDENCE INFORMATION FLOW
THROUGH SCHOOL SCHOOL: DATE:
Whole school
reporting - How do
4.
WHOLE- we support validity and
SCHOOL reliability of teacher
REPORTING assessment?
W1 FEEDBACK FROM DIALOGUE WITH SCHOOL
LEADERSHIP, GOVERNORS AND PARENTS INFORMS
CHANGES TO SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
3. Teachers summarise
SUMMATIVE Parents/carers receive oral Summaries of pupil
REPORTING
achievements in terms
and written reports that progress across the
of what pupils can do,
identify the next steps for cohort draw on a range
not only in terms of levels,
their children of information
grades or % TEACHER-
S1 S2 S3 PUPIL/PARENT
CONFERENCES
2. INCLUDE DIALOGUE
MONITORING Teachers base their Teachers take part in Pupils are aware of the A manageable system ON ATTAINMENT
There is a shared
OF PUPIL summative judgements of moderation/discussion criteria by which their work for record-keeping is in IN SCIENCE
PROGRESS understanding of
pupils learning on a range with each other of pupils work over a period of time operation to track and report
progression in science
of types of activity in order to align judgements is judged on pupils learning in science
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
1.
Teachers gather evidence Teachers gather Teachers use Teachers use assessment Teachers use assessment
ONGOING
FORMATIVE
Teachers plan Teachers involve pupils assessment to advance to advance pupils
of their pupils learning evidence of their to advance pupils
ASSESSMENT opportunities to in discussing learning pupils learning by learning by providing
through questioning/ pupils learning through learning by giving
elicit pupils science objectives and adapting the pace, time for students to
discussion and study of the products of feedback to students
knowledge and skills criteria for success challenge and reflect on and assess
observation activities and tasks content of activities about how to improve their own work
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7
Group discussion of initial ideas Eliciting ideas with sorting KWL grid
A group elicitation at the start of lesson can be recorded Giving children objects or pictures to sort can tell you a lot Ask pupils to consider what they already Know about a topic
collaboratively on large paper or sticky notes. For example, this about their ideas, especially if the categories are chosen by and what they Want to find out. At a later date, return to the
Y5/6 class consider how materials can change. the children. grid to consider what they have Learnt.
For example, when Y1 children sorted food items it led to a This particular example comes from Active Assessment:
discussion about where pasta comes from. http://www.millgatehouse.co.uk/product/active-assessment-
science/
Beacon Rise Primary School, Bristol
Holt Primary School, Wiltshire Victoria Park Primary School, Bristol St Pauls Catholic Primary School, Yate
1.11 Pupil box 1 - p1 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Positive, Minus, Interesting Pre and post unit thought showers
Group discussion can be structured by PMI: listing the Positive At Northbury Primary children complete Pre and post unit thought showers for each topic. For example, at the beginning of the
points, Minus points and the Interesting effects of a particular Y3 unit on Plants the child described factors which affect plant growth. At the end of the unit the child described photosynthesis
situation. This is one of a range of strategies for Bright Ideas and reproduction.
Time. For further details and other examples see http://
www.education.brookes.ac.uk/Partnerships/Primary-school-
teacher-resources/Primary-Science/The-Bright-Ideas-Time/
Y3 child
Yr 3 child
Yr 3 child
1.11 Pupil box 1 - p2 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
PUPIL BOX 2:
PUPILS FOCUS ON SCIENCE KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING, SKILLS
AND ATTITUDES IN LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND SUCCESS CRITERIA.
E.g. be clear about science focus rather than presentation etc.
1.12 Pupil box 2 - p1 of 1 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
PUPIL BOX 3:
PUPILS ASSESS THEIR OWN IDEAS AND
WORK AGAINST KNOWN CRITERIA
E.g. traffic lighting or highlighting objective, commenting on whether predictions are supported.
Making self assessment part of Self assessment in a floorbook RAG for self assessment
the lesson
Sometimes we get children to record their initial ideas in a Children record Red/
Children are asked to decide whether they have met floor book. They can then revisit this at the end of a lesson Amber/Green at the end
the objective. or topic to review how their understanding has developed. of the lesson to show
Generally at the end of a lesson they would have the how they feel about the
For example, initials on the board when you have
opportunity to say how they felt their learning went.Theyd Learning Objective.
Stand on a chair if you have usually mark it with a coloured dot, like a traffic light, or a Ashley Down Y5
smiley face, and peer assessment we do sometimes get them
to mark their own work. We will give them a set of criteria so
Reflecting on predictions
they might give like a mark for the presentation, a mark if they Children made predictions about what will float/sink. After
gave a reason for their prediction, or something like that, and testing the objects they then used colour to show whether
a mark for using scientific vocabulary. their predictions were accurate or not.
Ashley Down Y1
Malcolm Sargent Primary School, Stamford Oaktree Primary School, Swindon Ashley Down Schools, Bristol
1.13 Pupil box 3 - p1 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
End of unit self assessment Self assessment of attitudes to Science
Pupils complete a self assessment sheet at the end of a unit. A self assessment of how you feel about science using a blob diagram (www.blobtree.com).
They make judgements about whether they have achieved Children select the one they identify with.
the unit objectives, e.g. I can describe the difference between
a magnet and a magnetic material.
1.13 Pupil box 3 - p2 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
PUPIL BOX 4:
PUPILS ASSESS PEERS IDEAS AND
WORK AGAINST KNOWN CRITERIA
E.g. comment on another groups presentation, give 2 stars and a wish for piece of work.
1.14 Pupil box 4 - p1 of 1 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
PUPIL BOX 5:
PUPILS USE ASSESSMENT TO ADVANCE THEIR
LEARNING BY ACTING ON FEEDBACK
E.g. respond to mini plenary advice in second half of lesson, make improvements in next investigation.
1.15 Pupil box 5 - p1 of 1 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
PUPIL BOX 6:
PUPILS COLLABORATIVELY (WITH PEERS/TEACHERS)
IDENTIFY NEXT STEPS IN LEARNING
E.g. identify which part of the success criteria is missing, consider how to make the measurement more accurate.
Children are encouraged to take ownership of their learning. Individual next step cards can remind the children of a current
focus. The example here includes capital letters for English,
times tables for Maths and using observations for Science.
Crosshall Junior Academy Trust, St. Neots Holt Primary School, Wiltshire
1.16 Pupil box 6 - p1 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
TEACHER BOX 1:
TEACHERS PLAN OPPORTUNITIES TO ELICIT PUPILS SCIENCE
KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS
E.g. plans show range of elicitation strategies at variety of times E.g. beg/mid/end lesson.
Pre and post assessments For example, in a year 1 group discussion about animals, Groups identify existing ideas
at the beginning of the topic the children knew little about
Teachers find out what the children know at the start and amphibians or invertebrates. By the end of the unit, the Groups of children are able to share what they know. For
the end of the topic. This helps to pitch the lessons and also children could name animals in these groups and describe example, as a class they list animal groups and features, then
clearly demonstrates progress. go into groups to list animals of each type.
some of their features.
This activity was in preparation to make an animal guess
who game. It also gave the teacher a chance to consider the
childrens understanding of classification and calculate their
next steps.
1.21 Teacher box 1 - p1 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
At Burford we use interactive displays to celebrate science.
Year 6 questions at the beginning of the lesson. Children love sticking up their ideas on the interactive board.
As the topic progresses they see how their ideas Post-it notes promote questions and answers. Clip on vocabulary words can be taken down
and understanding change compared to the during the lessons to help with writing.
beginning of the topic.
1.21 Teacher box 1 - p2 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Annotated planning Teachers plan opportunities to elicit
Lesson planning including WALT, success criteria and Plan focused group exploration of materials with torches with teacher who writes comments on childrens sheets.
evidence being looked for AfL.
1.21 Teacher box 1 - p3 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
TEACHER BOX 2:
TEACHERS INVOLVE PUPILS IN DISCUSSING
LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS
E.g. discuss what good observation or conclusions look like.
*** I can read about science and tell you how the
information supported the scientific ideas
1.22 Teacher box 2 - p1 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Ledbury Challenges. Ledbury differentiated outcomes
an example of Year 6 challenges designed to
Y5 Group Activity
find out what the children knew
How can we prove that there are gases around us?
Circuit Challenges
Show concept cartoon and explain Wizard Wows problem.
Can you draw a diagram of the following circuits?
Dont forget to use a ruler clearly. Explain that Wizard Wow is very clumsy and spills his potions. He needs something that will absorb any spills quickly and effectively.
Steady I can also explain I can also explain why. I can predict with a reason
my reasoning. which will be the best.
Go I can even find multiple ways I can even use the terms I can even explain my results
to show air exists and give transparent, translucent using scientific reasoning.
reasoning for each. and opaque to explain my
reasoning.
The ready, steady, go criteria help children to upgrade their work by giving them clear targets
1.22 Teacher box 2 - p2 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
TEACHER BOX 3:
TEACHERS GATHER EVIDENCE OF THEIR PUPILS LEARNING
THROUGH QUESTIONNING/DISCUSSION AND OBSERVATION
Concept Cartoons for Formative In Year 5, children used the concept cartoon about the Using concept cartoons:
Assessment snowman to help them think about how best to insulate their
Teachers
magic potions as part of their magical materials topic. In Y2
At Ledbury we began to use Concept cartoons as starting the children used a similar cartoon to help them solve the Concept cartoons are ace. As a teacher they give me a
points to stimulate discussion and investigation. We gathered problem of how to stop the dinosaur eggs from melting. starting point to go from.
childrens ideas and encouraged them to think about how
they could investigate to find a solution. I think they can be used in different ways and not just for
science, for other subjects too!
Concept cartoons evolved as teachers began to use them in
different ways:
Great for getting the children thinking about the subject
As a cold task to find out what children already know and trying to formulate their own ideas.
about a topic
They are great for assessment and for using scientific
As an assessment tool to find out what children have learnt
language.
By making their own to fit to a specific topic
I love the concept cartoons as a tool for learning and a
To generate questions about a topic support for teaching.
1.23 Teacher box 3 - p1 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Using observations Recording discussion Research on recording assessment In the Thick of It is
based at Manchester Universitys Science and Engineering
We decided to build in challenges and up-levelled tasks to Ipads can be used to capture discussions with children. Education Research and Innovation Hub http://www.
provide more differentiation. We modelled observations For example, Soundcloud can be used to record childrens fascinate.manchester.ac.uk/projects/
leading to next steps based on good practise in EYFS. initial ideas, capture group reflections on what they have
discovered, or provide an opportunity for children to listen
back and reflect on their progress. curie-frost-investigation
newtons-frost-investigation
Ledbury Primary School, Herefordshire Great Moor Infant School, Stockport - Class 1
1.23 Teacher box 3 - p2 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Recording discussion in floorbooks Teachers gather evidence through class
discussion
A teacher or TA scribes the childrens comments in response to a stimulus eg magnetic materials.
Class discussions: ideas gathered on paper or electronic
This recording takes place in a group or class book which creates a record of how the childrens ideas have developed.
flipchart, names next to ideas.
For further information on how to use floorbooks go to
http://www.pstt.org.uk/resources/continuing-professional-development/floorbooks.aspx
1.23 Teacher box 3 - p3 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
TEACHER BOX 4:
TEACHERS GATHER EVIDENCE OF THEIR PUPILS LEARNING
THROUGH STUDY OF THE PRODUCTS OF ACTIVITIES AND TASKS
E.g. any recording, models, sorting
Childs work:
I think its chalk because marble is impermeable but chalk is
permeable. Marble does not wear away but chalk wears
away easily.
Childs work: Y5 children modelled the structure of the ear using plasticine. Y4 children made model skeletons at home. They had to
I think its chalk because marble is impermeable but chalk is They used whiteboard pens directly onto the Science tables research and choose their skeleton, materials and labelling
permeable. Marble does not wear away but chalk wears to label their models. method. The models were displayed at school and the
away easily. children self assessed their work.
Forres Primary School, Hoddesdon Dame Bradburys School, Saffron Walden
1.24 Teacher box 4 - p1 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Evidence of learning
Evidence of learning can be individual (on left) or as part of a group (on right). Plus that which is not written down eg acting out/modelling seed dispersal.
1.24 Teacher box 4 - p2 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Structuring evidence Gathering evidence of childrens learning Recording in a range of ways at Ledbury
Evidence that a child understands how to connect up a bulb A post it investigation planner under construction. As a result of feedback from children we explored different
with a battery to make it light ways of recording to make it more manageable and less
The finished planner can be photographed as evidence of a
onerous.
groups understanding of science investigation planning
1.24 Teacher box 4 - p3 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
TEACHER BOX 5:
TEACHERS USE ASSESSMENT TO ADVANCE PUPILS LEARNING BY
ADAPTING THE PACE, CHALLENGE AND CONTENT OF ACTIVITIES
E.g. support or challenge in response to pupils.
Adapting planning
The plans for the term are not written beforehand, the focus
and order for lessons is flexible to take account of childrens
interests, topical events and, most importantly, the needs of
the individuals within the class.
1.25 Teacher box 5 - p1 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Using childrens ideas to inform planning
At Woodley Primary we find out what Children are encouraged to think independently and
the children already know and what generate their own questions which they can then
questions they have, then use this to investigate.
inform our planning e.g. Y2 topic of Toys
The mindmaps make the learning more fun and
purposeful.
1.25 Teacher box 5 - p2 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Adapting the challenge Adapting to learners
Some groups are guided with how much of each substance At Forres Primary planning is informed by what the children Use childrens questions as starting point for next lessons.
to mix and prompt questions for observing, others are already know and would like to know.
prompted to use scientific vocabulary for irreversible changes.
Holt Primary School, Wiltshire - Y5/6 Forres Primary School, Hoddesdon Burscough Village Primary School, Lancs - Y3
1.25 Teacher box 5 - p3 of 3 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
TEACHER BOX 6:
TEACHERS USE ASSESSMENT TO ADVANCE PUPILS LEARNING BY
GIVING FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS ABOUT HOW TO IMPROVE
E.g. marking, oral feedback, next steps, extension Qs.
1.26 Teacher box 6 - p1 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Teachers give feedback Marking requires the child to respond and takes their ideas Teachers give feedback
further.
Succinct feedback structure: Teacher highlights:
The teacher offers a multiple choice the child has to circle to
Colour success criteria if achieved. provoke further thought. Tickled pink and green for growth
Ashley Down Schools, Bristol - Y1 Worlebury St.Pauls Primary School, Weston-super-Mare Burscough Village Primary School, Lancs - Y3
1.26 Teacher box 6 - p2 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
TEACHER BOX 6:
TEACHERS USE ASSESSMENT TO ADVANCE PUPILS LEARNING BY PROVIDING
TIME FOR STUDENTS TO REFLECT ON AND ASSESS THEIR OWN WORK
E.g. read and respond time.
1.27 Teacher box 7 - p1 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
The next step question or task could be pre-prepared A combinatation of pre-prepared question and comment
1.27 Teacher box 7 - p2 of 2 Ongoing formative assessment Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
MONITORING BOX 1:
TEACHERS BASE THEIR SUMMATIVE JUDGEMENTS OF PUPILS
LEARNING ON A RANGE OF TYPES OF ACTIVITY
I.e. not reliant on one snapshot to make overall judgement.
Target cards also get children to self assess and think about
their own knowledge and SC1 skills.
Crosshall Junior Academy Trust, St. Neots Drove Primary School, Swindon
2.1 Monitoring box 1 - p1 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
A range of evidence
Written and oral work throughout the unit is used to highlight
objectives at different times on the tracking booklet
2.1 Monitoring box 1 - p2 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Judgements from a range of work
At the end of a unit of work we make a kind of summative
judgement of their knowledge-based skills and their enquiry
skills and to do that we would look at our annotated planning
and a range of evidence for each child. So in Key Stage 2,
I tend to look in their books and then note any relevant
observations on the planning to see if theyre child-specific,
and then well kind of mark which level theyre in for that
and use that for the next term.Annotated samples of work
are useful to remind us of the context of the task and our
provisional judgement on the childs level. If we have several
annotated samples for a child we can review progress but also
make an overall judgement based on their performance in a
range of contexts.
2.1 Monitoring box 1 - p3 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
MONITORING BOX 2:
TEACHERS TAKE PART IN MODERATION/DISCUSSION WITH
EACH OTHER OF PUPILS WORK IN ORDER TO ALIGN JUDGEMENTS
E.g. staff meeting discussions of science work.
2.2 Monitoring box 2 - p1 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Moderation grafitti wall Writing in green picks out aspects of working scientifically that The staff together decided that there was evidence of
are being addressed. progression and talked about specific ways individual
Science subject leader Kate Porter did a work scrutiny of children could be moved on, such as using more scientific
science e books and displays in all classes that led her to be Writing in red notes how the work sample indicates a child is
language, and in conclusions giving reasons.
concerned that aspects of working scientifically were not
A attained as expected
being explicitly taught in a progressive way across the school. Another outcome has been to plan to focus on aspects of
She also had questions about how differentiation was being BA below attainment expected WS in more depth in each term e.g. analysing data so that
managed as this was not evident in the books.To feedback staff can support each other and moderation discussions
AA above attainment expected can be focussed.
the positive aspects and identity concerns collectively, Kate
led a moderation meeting in which progression from Y1 to Y6 Outcomes of moderation Also they developed a more general model of progression
was shown on a graffiti wall a roll of paper with samples of
One outcome of discussion was that staff were able to across the school so that the aim was for children to become
the childrens work in each year group annotated. The work
explain to Kate that differentiation had been by teacher more independent as they progress through the school.
samples focussed on working scientifically. This did not use
levels, instead it drew on the skills progression in the National working with a group, which had not been obvious in The next step will be to make judgments together about
Curriculum as a point of reference. the books. whether a sample of individual children have met, not met
or exceeded the expectations for their year group.
2.2 Monitoring box 2 - p2 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Moderation staff mtg Moderation - how meeting works
Staff bring along 2 pieces of work which they have levelled for At Drove teacher judgements are moderated between
discussion a secure piece and a piece which is just below groups of three colleagues, three times per year. These
(explain why not yet there). triangulation groups look at planning, science books and
assessment judgements (currently APP levels) together, using
a sub-sample of childrens work drawn from three points in
the attainment range. As part of the White Horse Federation,
Drove colleagues also have the opportunity to moderate
with colleagues in other primary schools, all of which the
Assessment Co-ordinator believes has improved the reliability
of teacher assessment:
2.2 Monitoring box 2 - p3 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
MONITORING BOX 3:
THERE IS A SHARED UNDERSTANDING
OF PROGRESSION IN SCIENCE
E.g. staff map progression of skills, TAs are involved in assessments.
Worlebury St.Pauls Primary School, Weston-super-Mare Victoria Park Primary School, Bristol
2.3 Monitoring box 3 - p1 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Crosshall Junior skills grid passed on to the next class teacher.
IMPACT
Sc1 skills (currently based on APP but could be Children in class
- Clear evidence of progress.
adapted to working scientifically)
- Gaps in learning can be identified.
The impact for our school was ..... The SC1 tracking sheet allows teachers to know what Now science is on the transfer sheet we can pass on
concepts have been covered and identifies skills that need to information about Science knowledge, Understanding and
We know where are children are and what they need to learn be taught. skills to the childs next class teacher.
next. So do they.
Crosshall Junior Academy Trust, St. Neots
2.3 Monitoring box 3 - p2 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Shared understanding of skills
Skills grids like Tom Robsons skills wheel (tredu.co.uk) support Such skills overviews can be used by teachers when planning,
a shared understanding. and during lessons when children can identify the skills focus.
2.3 Monitoring box 3 - p3 of 3 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
MONITORING BOX 4:
PUPILS ARE AWARE OF THE CRITERIA BY WHICH THEIR
WORK OVER A PERIOD OF TIME IS JUDGED
E.g. examples of what good science looks like are displayed.
Judgements are made in the lesson Pupils know what they are aiming for
Pupils understand how judgements are made because they are often done in the lesson - Teacher/child can highlight the tracking booklet Children keep a record of which criteria they have met each
lesson, creating an I can certificate by the end of the unit.
eg Y3 talk to a table at a time: tell me how you did this objective the child is responsible for proving they have done it.
This could be the result of written work, model making,
completing a challenge or a discussion with a teacher, TA or
peer in a plenary.
Malcolm Sargent Primary School, Stamford Burscough Village Primary School, Lancs - Y2
2.1 Monitoring box 4 - p1 of 2 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Science stars are displayed Pupils judge whether they have met Science skills toolkit
the criteria
Science stars (levels) are displayed in classroom showing key Year 1 at Holt have developed picture based success criteria
features of progression in enquiry. Generally at the end of a lesson they would have the for Working Scientifically which can be used by both pupils
opportunity to say how they felt their learning went. Theyd and teachers.
The science stars provide details of, for example, what a 4*
usually mark it with a coloured dot, like a traffic light, or a
scientist looks like the key features of a level 4 in scientific This supports pupils to focus whether they have been able to:
smiley face, and peer assessment we do sometimes get
enquiry. The science stars are also embedded in the planning
them to mark their own work. We will give them a set of Use senses
which details success criteria for the sequence of lessons.
criteria so they might give like a mark for the presentation, a
Use equipment
mark if they gave a reason for their prediction, or something
like that, and a mark for using scientific vocabulary. Explain findings
Predict
Shaw Primary School, Melksham - YKS2 Oaktree Primary School, Swindon Holt Primary School, Wiltshire
2.4 Monitoring box 4 - p2 of 2 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
MONITORING BOX 5:
A MANAGEABLE SYSTEM FOR RECORD-KEEPING IS IN OPERATION
TO TRACK AND REPORT ON PUPILS LEARNING IN SCIENCE
E.g. expectations on planning which annotate, end of topic grids, I cans.
2.5 Monitoring box 5 - p1 of 4 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Tracking sheets for scientific enquiry Active record keeping
Sheet follows science ability group through the school Coverage is mapped on termly planning grid (during the term, Group assessment sheets help to guide the questions asked
(children may move groups). not before). This helps staff plan for opportunities for learning by the teacher within the lesson. For example, with the group
and working scientifically, targeting areas which have not yet sheet to hand, the teacher can target their questions to the
Different colours for different years. next step for the group or individual.
been covered in that term.
2.5 Monitoring box 5 - p2 of 4 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Record keeping
Each child has a paper tracking booklet (a DNA journal) and Highlighting can be done by pupil/teacher, in/after lesson.
the child uses it with increasing independence as they move The criteria (APP for skills, QCA I cans for kn) are used for
through the school. lesson objectives and differentiation.
2.5 Monitoring box 5 - p3 of 4 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Recordkeeping - APP levelled sample In conclusion the fastest way to melt chocolate was to put Annotation provides scope for additional contextual
it in water when it is aloud (sic) to cool it returns to a solid information such as the degree of teacher scaffolding to
At Drove, teachers APP judgements are recorded on Excel Metal: hard strong, flexible, smooth. Wood: hard, strong, be included, providing a degree of flexibility in the matching of
spreadsheets and backed up by evidence, including examples flexible, rough. Glass: hard, breaks easily, rigid. Paper: smooth, evidence to particular sub-levels:
of work, annotated photographs and responses to questions breaks easily, flexible.
linked to particular AF sub-levels: we put things on there like whether they were supported so
(childs responses to APP unit linked as evidence to APP grid)
that, when we track back, and do the APP, we know whether it
This evidencing process is currently involves photocopies of was the independent, things like that...
work put in behind the APP sheet. (Assessment co-ordinator, Jan 2014)
2.5 Monitoring box 5 - p4 of 4 Monitoring of pupil progress Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
SUMMATIVE BOX 1:
TEACHERS SUMMARISE ACHIEVEMENTS IN TERMS OF WHAT PUPILS
CAN DO, NOT ONLY IN TERMS OF LEVELS, GRADES OR %
E.g. progress in skills is passed onto the next teacher.
3.1 Summative box 1 - p1 of 2 Summative Reporting Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Individuals within a group Brookside Report to Parents / Carers
Achievements discussed in terms of what pupil can do
Group tracking sheets provide a wealth of information about The Crosshall Junior School Transfer Form includes science, so
how individuals have progressed through the year. it can be discussed at transfer meetings Child 1
The sheets can be passed onto the next class teacher. She provides reasons for her ideas and predictions, using
some scientific knowledge to do so.
Child 2
3.1 Summative box 1 - p2 of 2 Summative Reporting Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
SUMMATIVE BOX 2:
PARENTS/CARERS RECEIVE ORAL AND WRITTEN REPORTS THAT
IDENTIFY THE NEXT STEPS FOR THEIR CHILDREN
E.g. at parents evening, comments on homework.
3.2 Summative box 2 - p1 of 2 Summative Reporting Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
Report identifies next steps Brookside Report to Parents:
Targets shared
Child 1 (linked to topic on electricity)
3.2 Summative box 2 - p2 of 2 Summative Reporting Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
SUMMATIVE BOX 3:
SUMMARIES OF PUPIL PROGRESS ACROSS THE
COHORT DRAW ON A RANGE OF INFORMATION
E.g. learning across a range of contexts is used to decide support or extension needs
Teachers use evidence gathered in pupil books or group floor books, together with their knowledge of how the children have
responded in lessons, to provide a best fit level at the end of each topic.
3.3 Summative box 3 - p1 of 2 Summative Reporting Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
A range of assessment information feeds into summaries of pupil progress at Whitehouse Primary
Learning Objectives
To decide on an approach to compare the strength of different
magnets
(for some) To evaluate the validity of different tests.
Activity
Provide the children with a collection of magnets and other materials (e.g. card,
fabric, tissue, thin wood, aluminium foil, paperclips) to explore. Ask them to find out
whether the magnets are all equally strong (see below for differentiated approach)
As a class discuss the different ways of testing the same thing, and talk about the
advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Discuss why it is a good idea to
try different ways of answering a question (-to get a more reliable answer).
Carry out the investigations and ask the children to report their findings verbally.
Key Questions:
How can we find out which magnet is the strongest?
Can you now put the magnets in order from strongest to weakest?
Can you think of any other ways to test which is the strongest?
Which magnet was the strongest? Did you get the same results with every
way you tested it?
Differentiated Activity
Lower attainers Ask which magnet is the strongest. Ask How do you know? and
use the response to help the children plan to systematically test each magnet.
Middle attainers ask children to devise their own method and use it consistently.
(e.g. how many pieces of card does it work through? how many paperclips will stay
on the magnet in a chain?) Challenge them to order the magnets from strongest to
weakest.
Higher attainers challenge the children to find several different ways of measuring
the strength of magnets and see if they result with the magnets in the same order of
strength.
Aiming High self assessment. Formative and summative mind-map. Written tests to support teacher judgements. Focused skills assessments from PSTT -
these are currently being updated by the
TAPS team. The original planning sheets
are available here: http://www.pstt.org.uk/
resources/curriculum-materials/focused-
assessment-of-science-enquiry-.aspx
3.3 Summative box 3 - p2 of 2 Summative Reporting Notes Previous page Next page Next box Back to top
WHOLE SCHOOL REPORTING - HOW DO WE SUPPORT VALIDITY AND
RELIABILITY OF TEACHER ASSESSMENT?
Is the summary of pupil achievement How do you go from everyday formative assessment to making summative judgments?
VALID?
Conversation with science subject leader Kate Porter, Worlebury St Pauls:
Is it an assessment of primary science?
Q: You clearly do a lot of formative assessment here. How do you make your summative judgments about
Are knowledge, understanding, skills and attitudes whether children have achieved the expectations for each year group?
considered? A: Well we do a focussed assessment each term so that we make detailed notes about each child and their working scientifically,
and we have the other knowledge of them from what we have seen in other science lessons and in their books. At the end of term
Have a range of types of activity been taken into account?
we simply use the evidence from the task, books and what is in our heads to make a judgement about what the child has met, not
Is the summary of pupil achievement met or exceeded the expectations. Of course we know what we want the children to learn from our planning, so we are always
RELIABLE? looking out to see if children have got it.
Would other teachers agree with the assessment? Q So how can you be sure the teachers are making good judgments?
A; Because I do a work scrutiny of science three times a year and we as a staff look together at what kind of progression we expect
Is there a shared understanding? at moderation meetings we can trust our judgment. But its an ongoing thing, you have to keep making sure everyone has a shared
idea of what to look for.
Is there consistency?
4.1 Whole box 1 - p1 of 2 Whole school reporting Notes Previous page Next page Back to top
Judgements on attainment made using A shared understanding of what good Assessment is an integral part of
a range of evidence - science looks like - planning -
Brookside Academy, Somerset Shaw Primary School, Wiltshire Burscough Village Primary, Lancashire
Evidence of pupils achievements is collected in each childs Assessment at Shaw is based on a shared understanding of Teachers can note on their planning those who had not
topic-work book over the course of a unit of work in science, what good science looks like. A clear framework for skills yet achieved the objective (emerging) and those who had
and these day-to-day assessments inform summative progression (based on Tom Robsons skills wheels and science gone further (exceeding); the rest having met the objective
judgements, rather than a single end of unit task. As well as stars) supports on-going formative assessment to move the (expected). The notes on planning form part of the ongoing
recording science work, pupil books include peer marking, children forward each lesson, but also provides the staff with assessment which can be summarised at summative intervals.
self-assessments, teacher comments and post-it observations criteria for making summative assessments.
noted during the lesson.
Evidence-based system -
Drove Primary, Swindon Ongoing record keeping owned by the
Teachers annotate childrens work, to provide feedback to the
children -
children and evidence of progression. Teacher judgements are Malcolm Sargent Primary, Lincolnshire
moderated between groups of three colleagues by looking A journal containing I can statements for each unit provides
at a sample of planning, science books and assessment an ongoing record of progress. The journal is not a separate
judgements. Moderation also takes place during the handover assessment record; it is used as an integral part of the lesson,
of assessment records between successive class teachers, as the statements (often displayed as the lesson objective) are
thus supporting continuity of expectation between one year Science stars guidance is displayed on the classroom walls for highlighted by teachers or children in or after the lesson, and
group and the next. use by pupils and teachers. it is this which makes the system manageable.
4.1 Whole box 1 - p2 of 2 Whole school reporting Notes Previous page Next page Back to top
NOTES: Pupil 1 - identify existing ideas
Monitoring 2 - moderation/discussion
Our thanks goes to all the children and staff at: The TAPS team:
Ashley Down Schools, Bristol Ledbury Primary School, Herefordshire Sarah Earle, Dan Davies, Kendra
Beacon Rise Primary School, Bristol Malcolm Sargent Primary School, Stamford McMahon, Chris Collier, Alan
Howe and Rebecca Digby
Brookside Academy, Somerset Northbury Primary School, Barking
Burford School, Marlow Oaktree Primary School, Swindon
If you would like to offer further
Burscough Village Primary School, Lancs Shaw Primary School, Melksham examples or provide the TAPS team
with feedback, please email
Crosshall Junior Academy Trust, St. Neots St Andrews Church School, Taunton primary.science@bathspa.ac.uk
Dame Bradburys School, Saffron Walden St Pauls Catholic Primary School, Yate
Drove Primary School, Swindon St Peters Primary School, Stoke-on-Trent
Fleet Wood Lane School, Spalding Victoria Park Primary School, Bristol
Forres Primary School, Hoddesdon Whitehouse Common Primary School, Sutton Coldfield
Great Moor Infant School, Stockport Woodley Primary School, Stockport
Holt Primary School, Wiltshire Worlebury St.Pauls Primary School, Weston-super-Mare