Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Facts:
Held: YES.
It is worth noting that the terms of the compromise agreement are indeed grossly loaded
in favor of Yap.
There was no proof that respondent tried to inform the opposing counsel of the
compromise agreement, nor did he try to inform the court of the alleged abandonment of
petitioner by her counsel.
Respondent saw an opportunity to take advantage of the situation, and the result was
the execution of the compromise agreement, which was grossly and patently
disadvantageous and prejudicial to petitioner.