Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
part of municipal law of a state which directs its courts and administrative agencies, when
confronted with a legal problem involving a foreign element, whether or not they should apply a
foreign law/s (Paras)
NOTE: part of the municipal law, particularly civil law, not international law.
Internal Rules
applicable to cases without any foreign element, which are also part of the municipal
law, by the fact that they do not purport to solve the problem
merely point to the law to be applied, whether local law or the proper foreign law
General Principles:
Part of municipal law of a State which directs its courts and administrative
agencies,when confronted with a legal problem involving foreign element , whether or
not they should apply foreign law/s or not
1. Monist School
o Both subjects are essentially the same because they manifest a single concept of law,
ultimately addressed to the same individual
2. Dualist School
Territoriality Principle
Extra-territoriality
Examples:
15 Nationality Principle
EX:
Consular Contracts
Family Code When either or both of the parties to a marriage are aliens, it is
21 necessary before securing marriage license, to provide themselves
with certificate of legal capacity to contract marriage
Art. 35. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning:
(1) Those contracted by any party below 18 years of age even with
the consent of parents or guardians;
Art. 35 (1), (3) Those solemnized without license, except those covered the
(4), (5),(6) preceding Chapter;
(6) Those subsequent marriages that are void under Article 53.
(Requisites of Marriage (LC-CAM): 1. Legal Capacity 2. Consent
3. Authority 4. Marriage License)
Art. 36
Art. 37
Art. 37. Marriages between the following are incestuous and void
from the beginning, whether relationship between the parties be
legitimate or illegitimate:
(2) Between brothers and sisters, whether of the full or half blood.
Art. 38
Art. 38. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning
for reasons of public policy: (blood-step-in-law-adopt3-surviving2-
killed)
(5) Between the surviving spouse of the adopting parent and the
adopted child;
(6) Between the surviving spouse of the adopted child and the
adopter;
(9) Between parties where one, with the intention to marry the
other, killed that other person's spouse, or his or her own spouse.
Territoriality Principle
Extra-territoriality
Examples:
15 Nationality Principle
EX:
Consular Contracts
Family Code When either or both of the parties to a marriage are aliens, it is
21 necessary before securing marriage license, to provide themselves
with certificate of legal capacity to contract marriage
Art. 35. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning:
(1) Those contracted by any party below 18 years of age even with
the consent of parents or guardians;
Art. 35 (1), (3) Those solemnized without license, except those covered the
(4), (5),(6) preceding Chapter;
(6) Those subsequent marriages that are void under Article 53.
(Requisites of Marriage (LC-CAM): 1. Legal Capacity 2. Consent
3. Authority 4. Marriage License)
Art. 36
Art. 37
Art. 37. Marriages between the following are incestuous and void
from the beginning, whether relationship between the parties be
legitimate or illegitimate:
(2) Between brothers and sisters, whether of the full or half blood.
Art. 38
Art. 38. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning
for reasons of public policy: (blood-step-in-law-adopt3-surviving2-
killed)
(5) Between the surviving spouse of the adopting parent and the
adopted child;
(6) Between the surviving spouse of the adopted child and the
adopter;
(9) Between parties where one, with the intention to marry the
other, killed that other person's spouse, or his or her own spouse.
Cases:
Summary: Eduardo K. Litonjua, Sr. and Aurelio J. Litonjua (Litonjuas) were engaged in the
shipping business owning 2 vessels. SInce their business are doing good, Bank of
America offered to purchase 4 more ships through their loan. Soon, they lost everything
in a foreclosure sale and owed 10% of their personal funds. They filed the case in RTC
Pasig against BA and BA international. BA NT&SA, and BA international filed a motion to
dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens. SC: dismissed.
Doctrines:
Philippine Court may assume jurisdiction over the case if it chooses to do so;
provided, that the following requisites are met:
(1) that the Philippine Court is one to which the parties may
conveniently resort to; - present
(3) that the Philippine Court has or is likely to have power to enforce its
decision - present
This Court further ruled that while it is within the discretion of the trial court to
abstain from assuming jurisdiction on this ground, it should do so only after vital
facts are established, to determine whether special circumstances require the
court's desistance; and that the propriety of dismissing a case based on this
principle of forum non conveniens requires a factual determination, hence it is
more properly considered a matter of defense
Phil. Export and Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. V.P. Eusebio Construction Inc. (2004)
Doctrines:
The rule followed by most legal systems, however, is that the intrinsic validity of
a contract must be governed by the
If none:
(2) in the absence of such a choice, the applicable law is that of the
State that "has the most significant relationship to the transaction and
the parties
(3) all matters relating to the time, place, and manner of performance
and valid excuses for non-performance are determined by the law of the
place of performance or lex loci solutionis, which is useful because it is
undoubtedly always connected to the contract in a significant way
laws of Iraq bear substantial connection to the transaction, since one of the
parties is the Iraqi Government and the place of performance is in Iraq.
However, since that foreign law was not properly pleaded or proved, the
presumption of identity or similarity, otherwise known as the processual
presumption, comes into play. Where foreign law is not pleaded or, even
if pleaded, is not proved, the presumption is that foreign law is the same
as ours
Summary: Northwest Airlines (Northwest) and C.F. Sharp & Company (C.F.), through its
Japan branch, authorized C.F. to sell its air transportation tickets. C.F. failed to remit so
Northwest filed in the Tokyo Court and it rendered a decision against C.F. RTC and CA:
dismissed the case for being out of jurisdiction SC: granted Northwests petition. SHARP
may be deemed a resident of Japan, and, as such, was amenable to the jurisdiction of
the courts therein and may be deemed to have assented to the said courts' lawful
methods of serving process
Doctrines:
the party attacking (C.F.) a foreign judgment has the burden of overcoming the
presumption of its validity
the Japanese law on the matter is presumed to be similar with the Philippine law
on service of summons on a private foreign corporation doing business in the
Philippines