I am well read in scientific literature and I am familiar with pseudo-scientific

ideas such as parapsychology. Parapsychology which involves the investigation of

telepathy, telekinesis, and NDE's does not hold up to real scientific scrutiny
because there is no evidence to support parapsychology and the subcategories within
it. I'm not saying investigating is a problem, but claiming that parapsychology and
it's subcategories are real, confirmed scientific ideas is a problem and downright
deceiving. If you believe that parapsychology is real and that there is legitimate
scientific evidence that supports this, then show me this evidence, after all you
do lecture about it. By the way if I had to guess (GUESS) why you are defending
parapsychology it's for the cash, you monetize off the gullibility of people. Here
are some things you should look at:
http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2001-17266-001
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6792436
http://www.imprint.co.uk/pdf/Alcock-editorial.pdf
http://archived.parapsych.org/papers/07.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20070519021029/http://www.csicop.org/si/9603/claims.html
?