Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
March 21,
2012
Demand Index...............12
Model Portfolios............................................16
This weeks Special Focus: Using TrimTabs proprietary equity ETF Flow data, an investor could have reaped up to 15.4%
by timing Leveraged Short U.S. equity ETF flows and up to 17.5% by timing Leveraged Long U.S. equity ETF flows since
2006. Find out how we mined the TrimTabs fund flow database to develop a timing signal that links leveraged U.S. equity
ETF flows to returns on the S&P 500.
U.S. Equity ETFs Send Sell Signal, while Leveraged ETFs Send Buy Signal. Emerging Markets Are Being Flooded.
U.S. equity ETF investors are bullish, purchasing $5.3 billion in the week ending March 21. This should concern the
bulls, as our research shows that equity ETF flows are excellent contrarian indicators. Out of all the variables we track,
long ETF flows provide the most statistically significant predictability patterns for market direction.
The leveraged ETF crowd is sending bullish signals. Leveraged-long U.S. equity ETFs redeemed 1.8% of assets in the
past week, while leveraged short U.S. equity ETFs issued 0.88% in the past week. Outflows from leveraged-long funds
and inflows into leveraged short funds are bullish in our opinion. See this weeks Special Focus for more on how
leveraged ETF flows can be excellent contrarian indicators.
ETF investors are adding corporate bonds and intermediate-term U.S. Treasury bonds. U.S. Corporate bond ETFs added
$573 million (0.51% of assets) in the past week while U.S. Intermediate Government bond ETFs added $284 million
(8.9% of assets). Long-term government bonds saw an outflow of $732 million in the past week, while short-term
government bonds saw an outflow of $122 million.
Currency ETFs are finally adding assets in the short term. They gained $43 million (0.81% of assets) in the past week
while losing $406 million (7.2% of assets) over the past month.
Investors continue to flood into Emerging Markets. Emerging Market bond ETFs pulled in $519 million (6.6% of assets)
in the past month while Emerging Market equity ETFs pulled in $976 million (1.5% of assets) in the same time. This
compares to an estimated bond ETF inflow of $1.2 billion (17.1% of assets) and equity ETF inflow of $10.2 billion (16.0%
of assets) over the past three months.
Short Interest Continues to Tread Water (Unchanged from Two Weeks Ago).
NYSE short interest remained at almost the same position as it was two weeks ago, closing again at 12.5 billion shares.
The previous reading on February 15 was also relatively unchanged from the January 31 reading, which had fallen 6.7% to
12.5 billion shares from 13.4 billion shares on January 13, the lowest level on record. Historical data shows that short
interest is a solid contrarian indicator (decreases are typically bad for equities).
Spec Crowd Increasingly Bullish on Oil. Long-Short Ratio Up Over 60% Since October 2011.
Speculative traders have grown increasingly bullish on black gold since October 2011. The long-short spec ratio on
crude oil contracts has increased over 60% to a reading of 2.47-to-1 on March 13 from 1.52-to-1 on October 4, 2011.
Although the ratio has fallen by more than 12% in the past two weeks, the March 13 reading is in the top 5% of all
recorded positions going back to January 2000.
3.5
Spec Crude Oil Contracts Long-Short Ratio
2.5
+62
1.5
1
Jan-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Nov-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 May-11 Jul-11 Sep-11 Nov-11 Jan-12 Mar-12
Hedge Funds Pull in An Estimated $1.2 Billion in February. Assets at Lowest Level since August 2010.
Based on preliminary hedge fund data for February, we estimate that hedge fund industry assets stand at $1.7 trillion, the
lowest level since August 2010. The Barclay Hedge Fund Index is up slightly above zero and clocked a return of 0.1%.
Fund of hedge funds also saw a modest inflow of $327 million in February after seeing five consecutive months of
outflows through January 2012.
After dissecting more than six years of TrimTabs proprietary daily leveraged ETF flow data, we found the following market-
timing signals emerged from the flows of Leveraged Short and Leveraged Long ETFs:
Leveraged Short equity ETF inflows could signal a way to earn a 13.1% average annualized return on a long S&P
500 investment.
Leveraged Short equity ETF outflows could signal a way to earn a 15.4% average annualized return on a short S&P
500 investment.
Leveraged Long equity ETF outflows could signal a way to earn a 17.5% average annualized return on a long S&P
500 investment.
Leveraged Long equity ETFs inflows could signal a way to earn a 7.0% average annualized return on a short S&P
500 investment.
U.S. Exchanges Boast 253 Leveraged ETFs with Assets of $32.9 Billion. Leveraged U.S. Equity ETFs Destroy $5.9
Billion in Wealth Since Inception.
Leveraged ETFs have gained wide prominence and popularity over the past several years worldwide. The 253 leveraged
ETFs listed on U.S. exchanges boast combined assets of $33.0 billion. The first Leveraged Short ETFs were introduced in
June 2006; today Leveraged Short ETF assets total $18.9 billion, nearly 27% more than the $14.9 billion in Leveraged Long
ETFs.
This report focuses solely on the 131 leveraged U.S. ETFs that offer exposure to U.S. equities (these account for 64% of all
leveraged ETF assets). The 74 Leveraged Short U.S. equity ETFs have assets of $10.3 billion, while the 57 Leveraged Long
U.S. equity ETFs have assets of $10.8 billion.
Leveraged Short Equity ETF Study: S&P 500 Plummets an Average Annualized 15.4% in Month Following Outflows
from Leveraged Short U.S. Equity ETFs.
To construct a Leveraged Short equity ETF timing tool, we sought to determine which flow time period measured over the
course of weeks provides the best returns on S&P 500 investments in the ensuing weeks. In our study, we:
The key insights emerge when we study the S&P 500 returns that ensue after weeks of negative flows and positive flows.
Note that outflows from Leveraged Short equity ETFs mean investors are betting the market will rise, while inflows represent
bets that the markets will fall.
As the Returns After Negative Flows heat chart below illustrates, the strongest annualized returns (1.3%) emerge when
investing for eight weeks after seven weeks of negative flows. The weakest returns (-25.8%) come after using seven weeks
of negative flows to invest for one subsequent week. The most interesting pattern to emerge is that only eight out of 64
matrix squares showed positive annualized returns over all daily rolling periods, while the rest are negative after a negative
flow period. This demonstrates that the bullish bets represented by negative flows from Leveraged Short equity ETFs are
excellent in predicting market downturns but not market upswings.
Returns After Negative Flows 1 Week Return 2 Week Return 3 Week Return 4 Week Return 5 Week Return 6 Week Return 7 Week Return 8 Week Return
1 Week Fl ows -11.92% -12.92% -10.54% -9.05% -6.42% -5.10% -4.79% -2.91%
2 Week Fl ows -10.30% -13.25% -10.86% -7.01% -6.37% -5.21% -3.93% -1.60%
3 Week Fl ows -7.37% -14.24% -12.59% -9.49% -6.76% -5.06% -2.65% 0.21%
4 Week Fl ows -19.94% -21.54% -18.57% -15.42% -10.98% -6.77% -2.49% -0.14%
5 Week Fl ows -21.87% -21.23% -17.67% -12.60% -9.22% -4.95% -1.14% 0.65%
6 Week Fl ows -21.96% -22.07% -15.93% -11.27% -7.73% -2.42% 0.07% 0.21%
7 Week Fl ows -25.81% -19.27% -13.66% -8.04% -3.17% 0.95% 1.18% 1.32%
8 Week Fl ows -23.28% -16.80% -12.14% -5.43% -1.42% 0.67% -0.48% -0.25%
The Returns After Positive Flows heat chart below illustrates the phenomenon in reverse. The weakest annualized returns
(2.39%) happened when investing for eight weeks after the rolling seven-week flow period. The strongest pattern of returns
(16.03%) came after using seven weeks of positive flows to invest for the subsequent one week. The most interesting
insight from the pattern below is that all average annualized returns over all daily rolling periods are positive after a positive
flow period. This demonstrates that retail investors buy into Leveraged Short ETFs at the top and lose out on the chance to
exploit subsequent uptrends in these funds when the markets fall.
Returns After Positive Flows 1 Week Return 2 Week Return 3 Week Return 4 Week Return 5 Week Return 6 Week Return 7 Week Return 8 Week Return
1 Week Fl ows 13.09% 12.81% 11.14% 10.01% 8.32% 7.37% 7.06% 5.89%
2 Week Fl ows 10.44% 11.34% 9.92% 7.82% 7.30% 6.63% 5.87% 4.65%
3 Week Fl ows 8.58% 11.37% 10.46% 8.70% 7.24% 6.31% 5.04% 3.62%
4 Week Fl ows 14.44% 14.74% 12.97% 11.15% 8.80% 6.71% 4.66% 3.53%
5 Week Fl ows 15.44% 14.25% 12.23% 9.48% 7.72% 5.67% 3.89% 3.01%
6 Week Fl ows 14.63% 14.02% 10.75% 8.36% 6.63% 4.29% 3.13% 2.99%
7 Week Fl ows 16.03% 11.89% 9.13% 6.52% 4.43% 2.74% 2.54% 2.39%
8 Week Fl ows 13.89% 10.13% 7.98% 5.13% 3.49% 2.67% 2.95% 2.76%
Although the positive and negative flow patterns above provide an excellent analysis of a long set of daily data, they are of
limited use in creating a model portfolio that generates practical market-timing signals. To do that, we used only flow and
return periods of matching lengths. For example, we used a two-week trailing flow period to invest in the subsequent two
weeks, and then used the next trailing two-week period to invest in the ensuing two weeks. Going long on the S&P 500 after
inflows to Leveraged Short U.S. equity ETFs and going short after outflows would lead to sizable results for any investor.
10%
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
1 week 2 week 3 week 4 week 5 week 6 week 7 week 8 week
Leverage Long Equity ETF Study: S&P 500 Soars an Average Annualized 17.7% in Two Weeks Following Outflows
from Leveraged Long U.S. Equity ETFs.
We now turn to a variable that is not in the TrimTabs Demand Index Leveraged Long U.S. equity ETF flows. We used the
same methodology for Leveraged Long U.S. equity ETFs as we did for Leveraged Short U.S. equity ETFs. Note that
Leveraged Long equity ETFs inflows mean investors are betting the market will rise, while outflows represent bets that the
market will fall.
The most interesting insight from the pattern below is that all average annualized returns over all daily rolling periods are
positive after a negative flow period. This demonstrates that retail investors sell at the bottom of Leveraged Long ETF
trends and lose out on the chance to exploit subsequent uptrends in markets.
Returns After Negative Flows 1 Week Return 2 Week Return 3 Week Return 4 Week Return 5 Week Return 6 Week Return 7 Week Return 8 Week Return
1 Week Fl ows 7.21% 9.18% 10.91% 9.66% 9.04% 8.82% 10.10% 9.76%
2 Week Fl ows 12.93% 17.75% 13.43% 10.67% 9.81% 10.51% 10.81% 10.39%
3 Week Fl ows 14.16% 9.87% 6.25% 6.12% 7.49% 8.58% 8.42% 8.37%
4 Week Fl ows 12.34% 7.07% 5.37% 7.01% 9.23% 9.92% 9.94% 9.63%
5 Week Fl ows 1.39% 2.86% 5.85% 6.91% 7.74% 8.02% 8.66% 9.49%
6 Week Fl ows 1.37% 6.26% 6.96% 7.21% 8.02% 8.74% 10.33% 10.12%
7 Week Fl ows 13.76% 14.90% 13.44% 12.14% 13.22% 14.25% 15.57% 14.68%
8 Week Fl ows 18.40% 16.92% 16.52% 16.39% 18.15% 19.14% 18.73% 17.51%
Although the returns after inflows (below) are not as one-sided, they are still pretty convincing. Only 13 out of the 64
matrix periods show a positive return after an inflow into Leveraged Long U.S. equity ETFs. This demonstrates that retail
investors buy Leveraged Long ETFs at the top and lose money when the market falls.
Returns After Positive Flows 1 Week Return 2 Week Return 3 Week Return 4 Week Return 5 Week Return 6 Week Return 7 Week Return 8 Week Return
1 Week Fl ows 1.39% -1.34% -2.80% -2.10% -2.00% -1.85% -2.82% -2.60%
2 Week Fl ows -1.93% -5.53% -3.25% -1.78% -1.45% -1.96% -2.32% -2.05%
3 Week Fl ows -3.10% -1.32% 0.90% 0.81% -0.28% -1.12% -1.19% -1.16%
4 Week Fl ows -1.59% 0.66% 1.54% 0.42% -1.08% -1.56% -1.75% -1.57%
5 Week Fl ows 5.06% 3.18% 1.16% 0.29% -0.39% -0.70% -1.23% -1.83%
6 Week Fl ows 4.70% 0.82% 0.22% -0.16% -0.83% -1.38% -2.44% -2.39%
7 Week Fl ows -3.16% -4.61% -3.94% -3.41% -4.18% -4.87% -5.68% -5.25%
8 Week Fl ows -6.19% -6.11% -6.03% -6.13% -7.22% -7.77% -7.63% -7.06%
Going long on the S&P500 after outflows from Leveraged Long U.S. equity ETFs and going short after inflows could lead to
sizable results for any investor.
Leveraged Long U.S. Equity Model Returns
20% Returns After Negative Flows Returns After Positive Flows
15%
10%
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
1 week 2 week 3 week 4 week 5 week 6 week 7 week 8 week
30%
20%
10%
% of Assets
0%
-10%
-20%
40,000
30,000
20,000
$ millions
10,000
-10,000
Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12
US INTL Bond Commodity
1000
500
0
-500
-1000
Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12
US INTL Commodity
Convertible Arbitrage 0.2 0.4% 1.6% -0.4 -0.9% 3.8% 0.2 0.5% 0.4% 39.8
Distressed Securities 0.9 0.8% 1.6% -0.5 -0.4% 4.4% -1.8 -1.6% -5.1% 111.4
Emerging Markets -0.3 -0.1% 4.1% -4.7 -2.1% 9.2% -9.5 -4.2% -4.5% 225.1
Equity Long Bias -10.0 -6.7% 3.7% -8.5 -5.7% 8.5% -11.5 -7.7% -4.2% 150.3
Equity Long Only -0.7 -0.8% 4.1% -1.3 -1.5% 10.5% 1.0 1.1% -3.6% 86.7
Equity Long-Short 0.0 0.0% 1.6% -5.1 -3.4% 3.9% -5.2 -3.5% -2.6% 149.8
Equity Market Neutral 0.0 0.1% 0.8% 0.2 0.6% 1.9% -0.2 -0.8% 1.7% 27.9
Event Driven 0.5 0.3% 2.4% -0.5 -0.3% 5.3% -4.3 -2.6% -1.0% 169.0
Fixed Income 4.5 2.1% 1.5% 5.3 2.5% 2.9% 14.9 6.9% 4.4% 214.2
Macro 2.3 1.6% 1.8% 3.7 2.6% 3.9% 8.3 5.7% 0.0% 145.0
Merger Arbitrage 0.1 0.3% 1.2% -0.2 -0.6% 1.8% 0.9 3.2% 4.5% 26.8
Multi-Strategy 3.0 1.3% 0.5% 5.2 2.2% 1.9% 19.1 8.1% -2.8% 234.6
Other 0.2 0.6% -0.2% -0.4 -1.2% 1.8% 0.7 2.5% 14.0% 30.0
Sector Specific 0.7 0.7% 0.7% -2.7 -2.8% 3.4% 0.3 0.3% -2.5% 94.2
Hedge Fund Industry 1.2 0.1% 2.3% -9.8 -0.6% 5.4% 12.7 0.7% -1.9% 1704.7
Funds of Funds 0.3 0.1% 1.6% -3.0 -0.6% 3.3% -22.6 -4.4% -4.2% 507.6
CTAs 3.5 1.0% 0.7% 5.7 1.7% 0.8% 34.6 10.3% -2.3% 336.4
Direct Investment In HF 0.9 -6.8 35.3
17
16
Billions
15
14
13
12
Oct-10 Dec-10 Feb-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Aug-11 Oct-11 Dec-11 Feb-12
The TrimTabs Demand Index (TTDI) measures demand conditions on the US stock market. It is bounded between 0 (very bearish) and 100 (very bullish)
Over the past nine years, it has correlated extremely well with stock prices movements
For more information on the TTDI, contact Minyi Chen (Chen.Minyi@TrimTabs.com)
The TrimTabs Demand Index Closed at 88.4 on March 20 up from 86.72 on March 19, which is very Bullish.
Variable Unit Current Value (1) Indexed Value (2) Regression T-Stat (3) Impact on the Index
Exchange Country Market Cap ($T) Companies Start Date Reporting Lag Source Benefits of the Dataset
NYSE, Duplicate Transactions and option-related
Nasdaq & USA 18.1 13,600 Jan-03 1-2 Days SEC buying is excluded. Aggregation by GICS
sector
Amex
TSX Canada 1.8 3,710 Jan 06 1-30 Days SEDI
London
London Stock
Stock United 3.2 3,233 Jun-06 1-2 Days Exchange
Exchange Kingdom
AMF, Commission
Bancaire, Financiere et
France,
Euronext 3.3 1,022 Jan-06 1-30 Days des Assurance, the
Belgium, Autoriteit Financiale
Not other known source for this data.
Netherlands Markten
Aggregation by ICB Sectors
Deustche
1.7 851 Jan-07 1-3 Days BAFIN
Boerse Germany
Hong Kong Hong Kong 2 307 Jan-07 1-3 Days HKEX
Demand
S&P 500 S&P 500 Sector S&P 500
% Change TTMP Index
(SPY) (SPY) Portfolio (SPY)
Portfolio
Inception Date 29-Sep-00 2-Sep-08 16-Mar-06
Legal Disclaimer
The data and analysis contained herein are provided "as is" and without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.
TrimTabs Investment Research (TTIR) any affiliates or employees, or any third party data provider, shall not have any
liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information contained in any TTIR publication. All opinions
expressed herein are subject to change without notice, and you should always obtain current information and perform due
diligence before trading. TTIR accounts that TTIR or its affiliated companies manage, or their respective shareholders,
directors, officers and/or employees, may have long or short positions in the securities discussed herein and may purchase or
sell such securities without notice. TTIR uses various methods to evaluate investments, which may, at times, produce
contradictory recommendations with respect to the same securities. When evaluating the results of prior TTIR
recommendations or TTIR performance rankings, one should also consider that TTIR may modify the methods it uses to
evaluate investment opportunities from time to time. For this and for many other reasons, the performance of TTIR's past
recommendations is not a guarantee of future results. The securities mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale
in some states or countries, nor be suitable for all types of investors; their value and income they produce may fluctuate
and/or be adversely affected by exchange rates, interest rates or other factors. TTIR has an investment management
affiliate, TrimTabs Asset Management (TTAM) which actively invests in highly liquid ETF securities which are sometimes
similar or identical to those tracked in the TTIR model portfolio and sometimes different. The portfolio trades held by
TTAM will not always be the same as those recommended by TTIR, primarily because the TTIR trade recommendations are
updated weekly while TTAM portfolios are managed on a daily basis as conditions change. Due to the highly liquid nature
of ETF securities tracked by TTIR, TrimTabs does not believe there is the potential for conflicts of interest. Further
distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2009 TrimTabs Investment Research. All rights reserved.